Potentially Inappropriate Medications Research Articles

Polypharmacy with potentially inappropriate medications as a risk factor of new onset sarcopenia among community-dwelling Japanese older adults: a 9-year Kashiwa cohort study

BackgroundClinical evidence demonstrating a longitudinal association between prescribed medications and sarcopenia onset is lacking. We investigated the association of polypharmacy (the use of five or more medications) and potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) with sarcopenia risk in community-dwelling older adults.MethodsIn this longitudinal population-based cohort study, 2,044 older residents with no long-term care needs were randomly selected from a community in Kashiwa, Japan. Baseline data collection was conducted in 2012, with follow-ups in 2013, 2014, 2016, 2018, and 2021. Prescribed medications and PIMs (drugs listed in the Screening Tool for Older Person’s Appropriate Prescriptions for the Japanese or potentially muscle-wasting drugs) were identified through interviews. New-onset sarcopenia was identified according to the 2019 criteria of the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia over a 9-year period and analyzed. We used Cox proportional hazards models to test the longitudinal association of prescribed medications with sarcopenia onset.ResultsOf the 1,549 participants without sarcopenia at baseline (mean age, 72.5 ± 5.5 years; 49.1% women; median and interquartile range, 6.0 [4.0–9.0] years), 230 experienced new-onset sarcopenia during the follow-up. After adjusting for confounders, polypharmacy combined with PIM use was strongly associated with new-onset sarcopenia (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.58–3.51; P < 0.001). No significant associations were observed for either PIM use or polypharmacy alone.ConclusionsPolypharmacy combined with PIM use, but not polypharmacy alone, was associated with an increased risk of new-onset sarcopenia over the 9-year follow-up period among community-dwelling older adults. Limiting polypharmacy and imposing the prescription of appropriate medications may facilitate sarcopenia prevention.

Geriatricians, general internists, and potentially inappropriate medications for a national sample of older adults.

Older adults are often prescribed medications that are potentially dangerous and geriatricians have specialized training in treating polypharmacy that may benefit these patients. To examine this, we compared potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) prescribing rates between geriatricians and similar general internists in the United States. Using national cross-sectional data from 2013 to 2019, we compared annual PIM prescribing rates between 2815 outpatient geriatricians certified by the American Board of Internal Medicine in 1994-2018 and general internists matched 1:1 on IM certification exam score and year, residency exam pass rate, gender, and US birth and/or US medical school. PIM prescribing was based on the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) PIM physician annual prescribing measures which consider medications flagged as potentially inappropriate in the American Geriatric Society Beers Criteria® guideline. We also examined prescribing of appropriate alternative medications. Prescribing rates were calculated as the percentage a physician's patients with Medicare fee-for-service part D enrollment seen in the outpatient setting in a given year (mean: 150 patients per physician) with a PIM prescription they prescribed. Across 30,677 physician-year observations, geriatricians were 16.7% less likely (95% confidence interval (CI): -19.8 to -13.7, p < 0.001) to prescribe a PIM (7.2% versus 8.7% of patients respectively) and 2.7% more likely (95% CI: 0.8 to 4.5, p = 0.004) to prescribe an appropriate alternative medication (52.0% versus 50.7% of patients respectively). Lower PIM prescribing was observed for most medication sub-types including central nervous system, anticholinergic, pain, and endocrine medications. In sensitivity analyses, differences in prescribing were similar when comparing recently trained physicians with more experienced physicians. Findings suggest geriatricians in the United States prescribe PIMs at lower rates than general internists. This highlights the value geriatricians provide as well as opportunities to embed key principles of geriatric care into internal medicine training and health care delivery systems.

Inappropriate Medications Use and Polypharmacy among Older Adults with Anxiety Disorder.

Elderly with mental health conditions usually use multiple medications, which predisposes them to inappropriate use of medications, which is defined as medications that should be avoided due to their risk; this outweighs their benefit given that safer alternatives are available. This study aimed to examine potentially inappropriate medication use among older patients with anxiety disorder. This study used a cross-sectional retrospective study design using twelve months of data extracted from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) database for older adults diagnosed with anxiety disorder and treated in the ambulatory care setting. Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) use was evaluated using the 2019 Beers criteria. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the sample. Pearson's chi-square tests (for categorical variables) and t-tests (for continuous variables) were utilized to measure the differences in independent variables between patients with and without PIMs. Binary logistic regression was used to examine the associations between PIMs use and identify potential factors for PIMs use among older adults with anxiety disorder. Analyses were performed using the Statistical Analysis Software version 9.4 (SAS® 9.4). The study sample includes 371 older adults (age ≥ 65 years) with anxiety disorder; their average age was (72.1 ± 5.8) years. PIMs use was highly prevalent among older adults with anxiety (66.6%). About 35.6% of the study sample used one PIM, 22.6% used two PIMs, and 8.4% used three PIMs. The most frequently prescribed PIMs were NSAIDs and gastrointestinal agents. The adjusted regression analysis found that PIMs use was less likely among men than women. In addition, PIMs use was more likely among women with diabetes, cancer, and polypharmacy. Future studies on strategies and interventions rationing PIMs use in older adults with anxiety disorder are necessary given the high prevalence of PIMs and polypharmacy within this population.

Impact of the publication of the Finnish Meds75+ database on the use of potentially inappropriate medications in older persons.

To evaluate the impact of the updated nationwide Meds75+ database and its linkage to the Finnish health portal on the use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) among older persons. We also aimed to evaluate whether there is regional variation in trend changes of PIM use. Meds75+ was implemented at the population level in 2015, so randomization is unfeasible. We used a quasi-experimental interrupted time series analysis to evaluate the changes in levels and trends of PIM use. The data included all Finnish community-dwelling persons aged ≥75 years (N = 920 163) who had medication purchases in the Prescription Register during 2009-2020. Data were linked with the Care Registers for Health and Social Care and the cause of death register. The prevalence of PIMs decreased from 20.2% in 2009 to 11.7% in 2020. The change of level of the monthly PIM users was negative (β -0.036, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.202 to 0.131), but not statistically significant (P = .673) after the publication of the database. We found a small decrease (β -0.018, 95% CI -0.083 to 0.047, P = .593) in the slope of PIM users, but it was not statistically significant. The regional results were similar to the main findings. Publication of the updated Meds75+ database did not decrease the level or trend of PIM users. In addition, this study did not show any significant regional variation in PIM use trends. Further research should focus on determining barriers and facilitators to the utilization of PIM criteria in clinical practice.

Regional variation of potentially inappropriate medication use and associated factors among older adults: A nationwide register study

BackgroundCertain medications should be used with caution in older persons, which challenges rational prescribing. Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are defined as medicines whose potential risk of harm typically outweighs the clinical benefits in geriatric population. Earlier studies have found regional differences in PIM use, but the factors underlying this phenomenon are unclear. ObjectiveTo compare prescription PIM prevalence among Finnish hospital districts and determine which population characteristics and factors related to social and health care are associated with regional variation. MethodsThis nationwide register study was based on the Prescription Centre data on all people aged ≥75 years in 2017–2019. Hospital district (n = 20) characteristics were drawn from the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare's, Finnish Medical Association's, and Finnish Medicines Agency's publicly open data. PIMs were defined according to the Finnish Meds75+ database. A linear mixed-effect model was used to analyze potential associations of regional characteristics with PIM prevalence. ResultsPrevalence of PIMs varied between 16.4% and 24.8% across regions. The highest prevalence was observed in the southern regions, while the lowest prevalence was on the west coast. Hospital district characteristics associated with higher PIM prevalence were higher share of population living alone, with excessive polypharmacy, or assessed using the Resident Assessment Instrument, shortage of general practitioners in municipal health centers, and low share of home care personnel. Waiting time in health care or share of population with morbidities were not associated with PIM use. Of the total variance in PIM prevalence, 86% was explained by group-level factors related to hospital districts. The regional variables explained 75% of this hospital-district-level variation. ConclusionsPIM prevalence varied significantly across hospital districts. Findings suggest that higher PIM prevalence may be related to challenges in the continuity of care rather than differences in health care accessibility or share of the population with morbidities.

Clinical pharmacist intervention to improve medication safety for hip fracture patients through secondary and primary care settings: a nonrandomised controlled trial

BackgroundHip fracture patients face a patient safety threat due to medication discrepancies and adverse drug reactions when they have a combination of high age, polypharmacy and several care transitions. Consequently, optimised pharmacotherapy through medication reviews and seamless communication of medication information between care settings is necessary. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the impact on medication management and pharmacotherapy. The secondary aim was to evaluate implementation of the novel Patient Pathway Pharmacist intervention for hip fracture patients.MethodsHip fracture patients were included in this nonrandomised controlled trial, comparing a prospective intervention group (n = 58) with pre-intervention controls who received standard care (n = 50). The Patient Pathway Pharmacist intervention consisted of the steps: (A) medication reconciliation at admission to hospital, (B) medication review during hospitalisation, (C) recommendation for the medication information in the hospital discharge summary, (D) medication reconciliation at admission to rehabilitation, and (E) medication reconciliation and (F) review after hospital discharge. The primary outcome measure was quality score of the medication information in the discharge summary (range 0–14). Secondary outcomes were potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) at discharge, proportion receiving pharmacotherapy according to guidelines (e.g. prophylactic laxatives and osteoporosis pharmacotherapy), and all-cause readmission and mortality.ResultsThe quality score of the discharge summaries was significantly higher for the intervention patients (12.3 vs. 7.2, p < 0.001). The intervention group had significantly less PIMs at discharge (− 0.44 (95% confidence interval − 0.72, − 0.15), p = 0.003), and a higher proportion received prophylactic laxative (72 vs. 35%, p < 0.001) and osteoporosis pharmacotherapy (96 vs. 16%, p < 0.001). There were no differences in readmission or mortality 30 and 90 days post-discharge. The intervention steps were delivered to all patients (step A, B, E, F = 100% of patients), except step (C) medication information at discharge (86% of patients) and step (D) medication reconciliation at admission to rehabilitation (98% of patients).ConclusionThe intervention steps were successfully implemented for hip fracture patients and contributed to patient safety through a higher quality medication information in the discharge summary, fewer PIMs and optimised pharmacotherapy.Trial registration: NCT03695081.

Gender Differences in Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use among Older Adults.

Use of potentially inappropriate medication (PIMs) is a prominent concern that leads to significant medication-related issues among older adults. Notably, older women tend to utilize more medicines than men; older women frequently take more drugs. In addition, some evidence suggests that prescription PIMs vary by gender. This study examines the gender-based variation in prescribing PIM among older adults in Saudi Arabia. A cross-sectional retrospective analysis of electronic medical records from a large hospital in Saudi Arabia was carried out. Patients over the age of 65 who received ambulatory treatment were included in the study. The utilization of PIM was assessed based on Beers criteria. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were employed to describe patterns of PIM utilization and identify factors associated with their use. All statistical analyses were performed using Version 9.4 of the Statistical Analysis Software (SAS® 9.4). The study comprised 4062 older people (age 65) who visited ambulatory care clinics; the average age was (72.6 ± 6.2) years. The majority of the study sample was women (56.8%). Among older adults, 44.7% of older men and 58.3% of older women reported having PIMs that should be avoided, indicating a higher prevalence of PIMs among women compared to men. In terms of the PIM categories used, women had a much higher utilization rate of cardiovascular and gastrointestinal drugs than men. In men, the use of PIMs was frequently associated with hypertension, ischemic heart disease, asthma, osteoarthritis, and cancer, while in women PIM use was associated with age, dyslipidemia, chronic kidney disease, and osteoporosis. This study revealed sex differences in PIM prescribing among older adults; PIM use is more common among women. Sex differences exist in clinical and socioeconomic characteristics and factors related to using potentially inappropriate medications. This study revealed essential areas that could be targeted by further interventions to improve drug-prescribing practices among older adults at risk of PIM.

Assessing Medication Use Quality in Older Outpatients Using the Beers Criteria: Findings from a Single-Center Retrospective Study.

No comprehensive assessment of the quality of medications used in older outpatients has been conducted in Thailand. This study aimed to ascertain the prevalence of and factors contributing to older outpatients&apos; use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). This cross-sectional study retrospectively assessed the prescriptions of older (≥60 years) outpatients at a secondary-care hospital. For PIM identification, the 2019 American Geriatric Society (AGS) Beers criteria were applied, considering all five PIM categories: PIM category I (medications that are potentially inappropriate in most older adults), II (disease-/syndrome-exacerbating drugs), III (medications that should be used with caution), IV (clinically important drug-drug interactions), and V (medications that should be avoided or have their dosage reduced based on renal function). This study included 22,099 patients (mean age, 68.86±7.64 years). Nearly three-fourths of patients were prescribed PIMs, with 68.90%, 7.68%, 44.23%, 15.66%, and 3.05%, respectively, receiving category I-V medications. The positive factors associated with PIM use included female sex (odds ratio [OR]=1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.16), age ≥75 years (OR=1.10; 95% CI, 1.01-1.21), polypharmacy (OR=10.21; 95% CI, 9.31-11.21), ≥3 diagnostic categories (OR=2.31; 95% CI, 2.14-2.50), and ≥3 chronic morbidities (OR=1.46; 95% CI, 1.26-1.68). The negative factor associated with PIM use was a comorbidity score of ≥1 (OR=0.78; 95% CI, 0.71-0.86). PIM use among older outpatients remains highly prevalent in clinical practice. The results of this study identified polypharmacy as the strongest factor affecting PIM use.

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting in Geriatric Oncology in India: An Understudied Topic that Needs Attention

AbstractIn the elderly, polypharmacy is a common problem, and drug interactions and adverse drug reactions (ADR) have been linked to considerable harm in several population-based studies. However, when compared with other medical disciplines, studies with elderly cancer patients are lacking in oncology and India in particular. Additionally, intake of multiple drugs and, at times, potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are also common in older cancer patients. Physiologically, the body's metabolic functions are reduced in the elderly, resulting in altered medication pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic characteristics. There is also a high risk of aging-related disorders, and an increase in pharmaceutical use. Because cancer can affect the physiological milieu, patients are more likely to experience negative drug responses, drug–disease interactions, and drug–drug interactions, thereby making the elderly more vulnerable to the ill effects. Considering this, there is a need for greater knowledge and measures that try to lessen exposure to and the risks connected to drug combinations that might be detrimental. As the geriatric population grows, the need to address medical issues among aging cancer patients becomes more pressing, particularly in India. As far as the authors are aware, there is no review that addresses the drug–drug interactions and adverse drug responses brought on by polypharmacy in older cancer patients. It is expected that this endeavor will help the fraternity and the patients, and will serve as a valuable academic material for the health care students.

Medication overload: A closer look at polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications among older people in Taiwan and Japan

BackgroundPolypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) are widely recognized as vital quality indicators of pharmacotherapy in older adults. As Taiwan and Japan grapple with the ongoing challenges of population aging, obtaining an accurate understanding of the prevalence of these indicators is crucial for developing effective strategies to optimize pharmacotherapy in older populations. The present study aims to comprehensively evaluate the prevalence of polypharmacy and PIMs in Taiwan and two Japanese cohorts, shedding light on the similarities and differences in prescribing practices across these populations. MethodsThis study employed a cross-sectional design to investigate individuals aged ≥65 years in Taiwan, as well as two Japanese cohorts: Japan Cohort 1 (dispensing data from chain pharmacies; year 2014 and 2019) and Japan Cohort 2 (claims data; year 2017 and 2019). The prescription records of these participants were collected from the national claims database in Taiwan for the years 2014, 2017, and 2019. To identify polypharmacy and hyper-polypharmacy, the study defined the use of 5–9 and 10+ drugs, respectively. Furthermore, the study identified PIMs based on the STOPP-J criteria. Notably, the study further explored the most frequently used PIMs (by categories) in Taiwan. ResultsIn the year 2019, the prevalence of polypharmacy exhibited similar rates in Taiwan (35.4%) and Japan Cohort 2 (33.1%), while surpassing that of Japan Cohort 1 (25.6%). Nonetheless, the incidence of PIMs in Taiwan was the highest (66.5%), exceeding those of the two Japanese cohorts (Cohort 1: 43.7% and Cohort 2: 40.2%) in the same year. Notably, the top three categories of commonly used PIMs in Taiwan comprised non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), antithrombotic drugs, and benzodiazepines. ConclusionsThis study highlights the varying prevalence of polypharmacy and PIMs between Taiwan and Japan, but emphasizes the need for collaborative efforts towards optimizing pharmacotherapy in older adults.

Analysis of Concomitant Medications Prescribed with Antipsychotics to Patients with Dementia

Introduction: Antipsychotics are still commonly prescribed to patients with dementia, despite the many issues that have been identified. This study aimed to quantify antipsychotic prescription in patients with dementia and the types of concomitant medications prescribed with antipsychotics. Methods: A total of 1,512 outpatients with dementia who visited our department between April 1, 2013 and March 31, 2021, were included in this study. Demographic data, dementia subtypes, and regular medication use at the time of the first outpatient visit were investigated. The association between antipsychotic prescriptions and referral sources, dementia subtypes, antidementia drug use, polypharmacy, and prescription of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) was evaluated. Results: The antipsychotic prescription rate for patients with dementia was 11.5%. In a comparison of dementia subtypes, the antipsychotic prescription rate was significantly higher for patients with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) than for those with all other dementia subtypes. In terms of concomitant medications, patients taking antidementia drugs, polypharmacy, and PIMs were more likely to receive antipsychotic prescriptions than those who were not taking these medications. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that referrals from psychiatric institutions, DLB, N-methyl-<sc>d</sc>-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists, polypharmacy, and benzodiazepine were associated with antipsychotic prescriptions. Conclusions: Referrals from psychiatric institutions, DLB, NMDA receptor antagonist, polypharmacy, and benzodiazepine were associated with antipsychotic prescriptions for patients with dementia. To optimise prescription of antipsychotics, it is necessary to improve cooperation between local and specialised medical institutions for accurate diagnosis, evaluate the effects of concomitant medication administration, and solve the prescribing cascade.

Drug Utilization Pattern and Potentially Inappropriate Medications among Elderly Inpatients in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Western Nepal

Introduction: Drug utilization research deals with the quality of care focusing on potentially inappropriate medication (PIM), The objectives of the study were to assess the drug utilization pattern (class of drugs used, average number of drugs per prescription per encounter, number of drug prescribed in generic name and antibiotics in prescription) and potentially inappropriate medications and their categories among elderly inpatients.&#x0D; Methods: It was a prospective observational study carried out in the medical department of Western Regional Hospital, one of the tertiary level public referral hospital in Pokhara, Nepal. One hundred and two patients of both sexes, age above 65 years and who were hospitalized in medical department were selected. The patients were followed until their discharge to obtain complete information about the drugs being used. Patient data collection form and Updated 2012 Beers Criteria were used to assess drug utilization patterns and determine PIM respectively.&#x0D; Results: Most of the patients were in the age group of 65-70 (37.25%) followed by 71-75 (27.45%) and 76-80 (18.62%). Out of 102 patients, 53 (51.97%) were male and 49 (48.03 %) were female. Antimicrobials were the most prescribed medicines (16.73%). Average number of drugs per prescription per encounters, number of drug prescribed in generic name and number of antibiotics in prescription were 7.26, 9.6% and 21% respectively. About 57% of medicines were prescribed from the national essential medicine list. Among them, 20 (3.91%) of all drugs had at least one PIM. There were 27 drugs in Beers criteria A, one drug in Beers criteria B, and no drug in Beers criteria C.&#x0D; Conclusion: Antibiotic prescription was found within the optimal values whereas values of other prescribing indicators were out of the optimal values in comparing earlier studies. PIM was observed in prescriptions that suggest irrational practice and the need for interventions.

Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Community-Dwelling Older Adults Living with Dementia.

The Beers Criteria identifies potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) that should be avoided in older adults living with dementia. The aim of this study was to provide estimates of the prevalence and persistence of PIM use among community-dwelling older adults living with dementia in 2011-2017. Medicare claims data were used to create an analytic dataset spanning from 2011 to 2017. The analysis included community-dwelling Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 and older who were enrolled in Medicare Part D plans, had diagnosis for dementia, and were alive for at least one calendar year. Dementia status was determined using Medicare Chronic Conditions Date Warehouse (CCW) Chronic Condition categories and Charlson Comorbidity Index. PIM use was defined as 2 or more prescription fills with at least 90 days of total days-supply in a calendar year. Descriptive statistics were used to report the prevalence and persistence of PIM use. Of 1.6 million person-year observations included in the sample, 32.7% used one or more PIMs during a calendar year in 2011-2017. Breakdown by drug classes showed that 14.9% of the sample used anticholinergics, 14.0% used benzodiazepines, and 11.0% used antipsychotics. Conditional on any use, mean annual days-supply for all PIMs was 270.6 days (SD = 102.7). The mean annual days-supply for antipsychotic use was 302.7 days (SD = 131.2). Significant proportion of community-dwelling older adults with dementia used one or more PIMs, often for extended periods of time. The antipsychotic use in the community-dwelling older adults with dementia remains as a significant problem.

Potentially inappropriate medications and potential prescribing omissions in hospitalised older adults in New Zealand: A retrospective study.

Medication errors can have detrimental effects on patient outcomes, yet there are limited data on the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs) among older adult inpatients in New Zealand (NZ). This study investigated exposure to PIMs and PPOs in older adults in a New Zealand hospital. Electronic medical records of 846 older adults (≥ 65 years) discharged from the Auckland District Health Board between June 2020 and May 2021 were retrospectively reviewed to extract data on sociodemographic, medication and diagnostic information. STOPP/START version 2 was used to evaluate PIMs and PPOs on admission and discharge. The mean age was 77.47 ± 8.12 years, and 51% were female. On admission, 48% had ≥1 PIMs and 40% had ≥1 PPOs. On discharge, 45% had ≥1 PIMs and 40% had ≥1 PPOs. Increasing age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.02, 95% CI [confidence interval] 1.01, 1.04), number of medicines (AOR = 1.23, CI 1.17, 1.29) and 28-day admission history (AOR = 1.58, CI 1.15, 2.18) were associated with higher odds of PIMs use on admission. At discharge, the number of medicines (AOR = 1.19, CI 1.13, 1.25) and history of readmission (AOR = 1.47, CI 1.08, 2.02) were associated with higher odds of PIMs. Female patients had higher odds of PPOs both on admission (AOR = 1.35, CI 1.02, 1.78) and discharge (AOR = 1.34, CI 1.01, 1.78). Māori, Asian and Pacific patients were more likely to have prescribing omissions compared to NZ Europeans. Prescribing omissions and inappropriate medications were common in older inpatients. There were differences observed between different ethnic groups, with NZ Europeans having fewer omissions than other ethnic groups. These findings highlight key opportunities for health-care providers to improve medication use in older adults in NZ.

Potentially inappropriate medications and cognitive performance: cross-sectional results from the ELSA-Brasil study.

Potentially inappropriate medications (PIM), especially those with potential effects on the central nervous system, can increase the risk of cognitive impairment. We investigated the association of the use of PIM and PIM that may impair cognition (PIM-Cog) with cognitive performance among older adults. In this cross-sectional study with 2,626 participants, PIM and PIM-Cog were defined by the 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers criteria. We calculated global cognition and memory, verbal fluency, and Trail Making Test B version (TMT-B) z-scores. Linear regression models adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical variables were used to investigate the association between PIM and cognition. 27% and 7% of the sample (mean age = 65.1 ± 4.1years old, 54% women, and 61% White) used at least one PIM and PIM-cog, respectively. PIM was associated with poor performance in the TMT-B (β = -0.17, 95% Cl = -0.29; -0.05, p = 0.007). PIM-Cog was also associated with poor TMT-B performance (β = -0.08, 95% Cl = -0.15; -0.01, p = 0.025). The use of PIM and PIM-Cog was associated with poor executive function among older adults. The review of PIM use and the deprescription of these drugs may be an effective way to improve cognitive function.

Feasibility of the Implementation of LESS-CHRON in Clinical Practice: A Pilot Intervention Study in Older Patients With Multimorbidity.

Potentially inappropriate medication refers to the prescription of drugs whose risks outweigh the benefits. There are different pharmacotherapeutic optimization strategies to detect and avoid potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), namely deprescription. The List of Evidence-Based Deprescribing for Chronic Patients (LESS-CHRON) criteria were designed as a tool to systematize the deprescribing process. LESS-CHRON has established itself as one of the most suitable to be applied in older (≥65 years) multimorbid patients. However, it has not been applied to these patients, to measure the impact on their treatment. For this reason, a pilot study was conducted to analyze the feasibility of implementing this tool in a care pathway. A pre-post quasi-experimental study was conducted. Older outpatients with multimorbidity from the Internal Medicine Unit of a benchmark Hospital were included. The main variable was feasibility in clinical practice, understood as the likelihood that the deprescribing intervention recommended by the pharmacist would be applied to the patient. Success rate, therapeutic, and anticholinergic burden, and other variables related to health care utilization were analyzed. A total of 95 deprescribing reports were prepared. Forty-three were evaluated by the physician who assessed the recommendations made by pharmacists. This translates into an implementation feasibility of 45.3%. The application of LESS-CHRON identified 92 PIMs. The acceptance rate was 76.7% and after 3 months 82.7% of the stopped drugs remained deprescribed. A reduction in anticholinergic burden and enhanced adherence was achieved. However, no improvement was found in clinical or health care utilization variables. The implementation of the tool in a care pathway is feasible. The intervention has achieved great acceptance and deprescribing has been successful in a not insignificant percentage. Future studies with a larger sample size are necessary to obtain more robust results in clinical and health care utilization variables.

Classifying Polypharmacy According to Pharmacotherapeutic and Clinical Risks in Older Adults: A Latent Class Analysis in Quebec, Canada.

The simplistic definition of polypharmacy, often designated as the concomitant use of five medications or more, does not distinguish appropriate from inappropriate polypharmacy. Classifying polypharmacy according to varying levels of health risk would help optimise medication use. We aimed to characterise different types of polypharmacy among older adults and evaluate their association with mortality and institutionalisation. Using healthcare databases from the Quebec Integrated Chronic Disease Surveillance System, we selected a community-based random sample of the population ≥ 66 years old covered by the public drug plan. Categorical indicators used to describe polypharmacy included number of medications, potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), drug-drug interactions, enhanced surveillance medications, complex route of administration medications, anticholinergic cognitive burden (ACB) score and use of blister cards. We used a latent class analysis to subdivide participants into distinct groups of polypharmacy. Their association with 3-year mortality and institutionalisation was assessed with adjusted Cox models. In total, 93,516 individuals were included. A four-class model was selected with groups described as (1) no polypharmacy (46% of our sample), (2) high-medium number of medications, low risk (33%), (3) medium number of medications, PIM use with or without high ACB score (8%) and (4) hyperpolypharmacy, complex use, high risk (13%). Using the class without polypharmacy as the reference, all polypharmacy classes were associated with 3-year mortality and institutionalisation, with the most complex/inappropriate classes denoting the highest risk (hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval]: class 3, 70-year-old point estimate for mortality 1.52 [1.30-1.78] and institutionalisation 1.86 [1.52-2.29]; class 4, 70-year-old point estimate for mortality 2.74 [2.44-3.08] and institutionalisation 3.11 [2.60-3.70]). We distinguished three types of polypharmacy with varying pharmacotherapeutic and clinical appropriateness. Our results highlight the value of looking beyond the number of medications to assess polypharmacy.

American Geriatrics Society 2023 updated AGS Beers Criteria® for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults.

The American Geriatrics Society (AGS) Beers Criteria® (AGS Beers Criteria®) for Potentially Inappropriate Medication (PIM) Use in Older Adults is widely used by clinicians, educators, researchers, healthcare administrators, and regulators. Since 2011, the AGS has been the steward of the criteria and has produced updates on a regular cycle. The AGS Beers Criteria® is an explicit list of PIMs that are typically best avoided by older adults in most circumstances or under specific situations, such as in certain diseases or conditions. For the 2023 update, an interprofessional expert panel reviewed the evidence published since the last update (2019) and based on a structured assessment process approved a number of important changes including the addition of new criteria, modification of existing criteria, and formatting changes to enhance usability. The criteria are intended to be applied to adults 65 years old and older in all ambulatory, acute, and institutionalized settings of care, except hospice and end-of-life care settings. Although the AGS Beers Criteria® may be used internationally, it is specifically designed for use in the United States and there may be additional considerations for certain drugs in specific countries. Whenever and wherever used, the AGS Beers Criteria® should be applied thoughtfully and in a manner that supports, rather than replaces, shared clinical decision-making.

Potentially inappropriate medications among elderly people with neurocognitive disorders - A nationwide register-based study using 3 different explicit criteria.

The use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) is a problem since it might contribute significantly to adverse drug reactions and hospital admissions among elderly with major neurocognitive disorder (NCD). To assess the appropriateness of drug treatment, different explicit criteria have been developed. To investigate and compare the prevalence of PIM users among elderly with major NCD on a nationwide basis using 3 different explicit criteria. Furthermore, the study aimed to investigate factors associated with the use of PIMs. This nationwide register-based study included 35,212 people, 65 years or older, diagnosed with major NCD and registered in the Swedish registry for cognitive/dementia disorders up to June 30, 2017 and alive December 31, 2017. PIMs were identified using 3 different explicit criteria; the Swedish quality indicators, the EU(7)-PIM list and the AGS Beers Criteria. PIM use was defined as having collected a minimum of one PIM at least once between July 01 - December 31, 2017. The numbers of people using one or more PIMs were 7629 (21.7%) according to the Swedish quality indicators, 11,838 (33.6%) according to the EU(7)-PIM list, and 12,002 (34.1%) according to AGS Beers Criteria. Antipsychotics, antithrombotic agents and anxiolytics were the most frequently used PIM class according to the different assessment tools, respectively. The use of PIMs was positively associated with vascular dementia and Lewy body dementia/Parkinson's disease dementia, regardless of the assessment tool used. However, the association between using at least one PIM and age, sex, MMT-value and frontotemporal dementia, differed depending on the criteria used. The different results and included PIMs indicate the different perspectives on PIMs between criteria, which make it difficult to compare the results. However, psychotropic drug use requires further highlighting, as well as the association between PIM use and different types of major NCD.

Potentially inappropriate medications use in a psychiatric elderly care hospital: A cross-sectional study using Beers criteria.

Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) carry risks that outweigh any potential benefits when compared to safer or more effective alternative treatments. Adverse drug events are more likely to occur in older adults with psychiatric diseases due to multimorbidity, polypharmacy, and age-related changes in drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and risk factors of PIM use in an aged care hospital's psychogeriatric division, using the American Geriatrics Society Beers criteria 2019. This cross-sectional study was conducted on all current inpatients, having a mental disorder and aged ≥65 years, in one elderly care hospital in Beirut, from March to May 2022. Medications, sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were collected from patients'medical records. PIMs were evaluated based on Beers criteria 2019. Independent variables were described using descriptive statistics. Factors associated with PIM use were identified by bivariate analysis followed by binary logistic regression. A two-sided p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The study included 147 patients, with a mean age of 76.3 years, 46.9% of them having schizophrenia, 68.7% using 5 or more drugsand 90.5% taking at least 1PIM. The most prescribed PIMs were antipsychotics (40.2%), anticholinergics (16%), and antidepressants (7.8%). PIM use was significantly associated with polypharmacy (AOR = 20.88, 95% CI: 1.22-357.87, p = 0.04) and anticholinergic cognitive burden (ACB) score (AOR = 7.25, 95% CI: 1.13-46.52, p = 0.04). PIMs were highly prevalent among hospitalized Lebanese psychiatric elderly. Polypharmacy and ACB score were the determinants of PIM use. A multidisciplinary medication review led by a clinical pharmacist could reduce PIM use.