Talent Management (TM) has become a strategic priority for companies looking to identify high potential individuals for future positions, because investments only in Talent Acquisition proved to be inefficient over time, due to the “talent war”. Given the scenario, investments in strategies to retain and develop high potential talents in the company increase competitiveness in the long term. The professional potential evaluation is an important TM practice, however there is no exact formula to identify an individual's potential, due to the different dimensions required. With this, the present article aims to contributes for fill a gap in the literature of multicriteria frameworks for potential evaluation, considering expert's behaviour and knowledge. The methodology was divided in three main points: 1) identify attributes and design a criteria structure for the potential evaluation with experts; 2) criteria evaluation by the experts, through the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method; and 3) alternatives evaluation through the ELECTRE-TRI method, using the expert's knowledge defining the method's parameters. The results indicated a structure with 6 main criteria, its importance weights, and a professional potential evaluation, considering 3 classes: a) Hight Potential; b) Potential to Test; and c) Professional Maintainer. For the future of the research, one of the steps in the roadmap is consider other methos to do the evaluation and compare them.