Potential Risk Factors For Venous Thromboembolism Research Articles

Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) among Patients with Active Hematological Cancer: A Population-Based Case-Control Study.

Background: Hematological cancer patients are at an increased risk for VTE (RR range = 12–32). However, whether VTE risk among such patients can be further stratified is uncertain.Objective: To test hematological cancer type, stage, stage progression and chemotherapy as potential risk factors for VTE among active hematological cancer patients after controlling for other previously-identified VTE risk factors.Methods: Using the resources of the Rochester Epidemiology Project, Mayo Clinic Master Diagnostic Index and Mayo Clinic Tumor Registry, we identified all Olmsted County, MN residents with active hematological cancer over the 28-year period, 1973–2000. From this prevalence cohort, we identified 86 patients with no prior VTE (controls) who were matched on age and date of hematological cancer diagnosis to 86 hematological cancer patients with incident VTE over the same time frame (cases). For all cases and controls, we reviewed the complete medical records in the community for baseline and hematological cancer-related characteristics. Hematological cancers were re-staged at the dates of the cancer and VTE diagnosis. We tested these characteristics as potential risk factors for VTE in active hematological cancer using conditional logistic regression.Results: In an initial multivariate analysis that included body mass index (BMI), hospitalization, and any infection or central venous catheter placement within 90 days prior to the VTE event, VTE was significantly associated with hospitalization (OR=6.70; p<0.001), and marginally associated with any infection (OR=2.18; p=0.09). After adjusting for the above variables, chemotherapy administered within the preceding 90 days was significantly associated with VTE (OR=4.25; p=0.02), while stage progression was marginally associated (OR=4.79; p=0.10). Compared to all other hematological cancer types, acute leukemia (OR=5.95; p=0.01) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (OR=2.61; p=0.01) were associated with VTE. However, after adjusting for BMI, hospitalization, any infection and central venous catheter, only non-Hodgkin's lymphoma was independently associated with VTE (OR=3.79, p=0.009), while acute leukemia was not (OR=2.66, p=0.35).Conclusions: Hematological cancer type (in particular, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and possibly acute leukemia), recent hospitalization, recent chemotherapy, and possibly stage progression and recent infection, are risk factors for VTE among patients with active hematological cancer.

Risk of venous thromboembolism among hospitalized medically ill patients

The 90-day risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among medically ill patients admitted to a hospital was estimated and is discussed. Patients aged > or =40 years who were hospitalized between January 1, 1998, and June 30, 2002, for reasons other than traumatic injury, labor and delivery, mental disorder, or VTE and who did not undergo surgery were identified in a large U.S. healthcare claims database. Patients receiving anticoagulants in the 90-day period preceding hospital admission were excluded. We estimated the percentage of study subjects who developed clinical deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) within 90 days of hospital admission using Kaplan-Meier methods. We also estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for potential risk factors for VTE using univariate and stepwise multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models. Among 92,162 study subjects, 1468 (1.59%) developed clinical DVT or PE within 90 days of hospital admission; 18% of these events occurred postdischarge. In multivariate analyses, significant risk factors for clinical VTE included: 1) history of cancer (HR, 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45-1.93); 2) history of VTE within six months of index admission (HR, 6.14; 95% CI, 4.74-7.96); 3) operating room procedure within 30 days of index admission (HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.47-2.24); 4) peripheral artery disease during index admission (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.28-2.21); and 5) heart failure during index admission (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.52-1.95). The risk of clinical VTE among medically ill patients admitted to a hospital, although less than that of patients undergoing major surgery, is not negligible. Patients with a history of recent VTE or surgery, those who are admitted to the intensive care unit, those with an admitting diagnosis of heart failure, and those with active cancer are at especially high risk of VTE and deserve increased consideration for prophylaxis.

Novel Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism (VTE): A Population-Based Case-Control Study.

Background: While several uncommon disorders (e.g., myeloproliferative diseases, connective tissue disease, etc.) have been suggested as potential risk factors for VTE, the independence and magnitude of any risk is uncertain.Objective: To test uncommon characteristics as potential independent risk factors for VTE, and estimate the magnitude of risk for each.Methods: Using the resources of the Rochester Epidemiology Project, we identified all incident cases of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism over the 6-year period, 1992–1997. For each objectively confirmed case (n=562), we identified up to two Olmsted County residents without VTE who most closely matched a case on age, gender, and medical record number (n=755). Because medical record numbers are assigned sequentially, such matching assures a similar duration of medical follow-up. For all cases and controls, we reviewed the complete medical records in the community for over 125 baseline characteristics which were tested for an association with VTE using conditional logistic regression.Results: The mean ± SD (range) ages for cases and controls were 65.71 ± 18.85 (0–102) and 64.90 ± 18.66 (0–102) years, respectively, and 55.5% were female. Novel univariate risk factors for incident VTE included former tobacco smoker, ischemic heart disease, valvular heart disease, chronic lung disease, all-cause pulmonary hypertension, chronic renal disease, myeloproliferative disorders, any infection, femoral artery catheterization (angiography or percutaneous intervention), ICU admission and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy. Among infections, septicemia, pneumonia, and ENT, cardiovascular, GI, urinary tract and skin/soft tissue infections were univariately associated with VTE; reproductive tract infection was not. Diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, lipid-lowering drugs (including statins), inflammatory bowel disease, asthma, connective tissue disease, and influenza were not univariately associated with VTE, and beta-blocker therapy was not protective. A multivariate analysis will test these characteristics as potential independent VTE risk factors.Conclusions: Several novel characteristics are univariately associated with VTE. Such novel characteristics may provide new insights into VTE mechanisms if, upon further analysis, these characteristics are independent VTE risk factors.

Comparison of incidence/risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among selected clinical and hereditary risk markers: A community-based cohort study

BackgroundLittle information is available from community-based long-term VTE cohort studies to compare the absolute thrombosis risk of established clinical and genetic risk factors.Materials and methodsThe occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) was observed during a 10-year observation period in the BAvarian ThromboEmbolic Risk (BATER) study, a cohort study of 4337 women (age 18–55 years). We collected data on demographics, reproductive life, lifestyle, conditions/diseases, and particularly potential risk factors for VTE with a self-administered questionnaire. The objective was to present incidence rates of VTE and to show relative risk estimated associated with different clinical and genetic risk factors.Results34 new, by diagnostic means confirmed VTE events occurred during the observation time of 32,656 women-years (WY). The overall incidence of VTE was 10.4 per 104 WY. The incidence rates varied markedly among different risk cohorts. The highest incidence was observed in women with previous history of VTE, followed by family history of VTE. None of the measured "genetically-related risk markers" (antithrombin, protein C, FVL, prothrombin mutation, or MTHFR) showed a significant VTE risk.ConclusionMost of the discussed VTE risk factors showed no significant association with the occurrence of new VTEs due to smallness of numbers. Only first-degree family history of VTE and own history of a previous VTE event depicted a significant association with future VTE. Clinical information seems to be more important to determine future VTE risk than genetically related laboratory tests.

PRL as a Novel Potent Cofactor for Platelet Aggregation

Pregnancy (including puerperium) is a period of hypercoagulability and seems to be an independent major risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the basis of the increased risk of VTE in pregnancy and around delivery is unknown. We hypothesized that changes in PRL, which is a prominently increased hormone during pregnancy and lactation, might be involved in the activation of platelets. To investigate platelet functional abnormalities in pregnancy, we assessed the ADP-stimulated and nonstimulated P-selectin expression of platelets in 42 consecutive pregnant women, 22 normo- and hyperprolactinemic patients with pituitary tumors, and controls. In addition, the aggregation of platelets by human PRL in vitro was studied. We found a significant correlation between PRL values and ADP stimulation of platelets in pregnant women (r = 0.56; P < 0.0001) and patients with pituitary tumors (r = 0.57; P = 0.006). Hyperprolactinemic pregnant women or hyperprolactinemic patients with pituitary tumors revealed significantly higher ADP stimulation of platelets (P < 0.0001) than healthy controls or normoprolactinemic patients with pituitary tumors. These results were reconciled by increased in vitro stimulation and aggregation of platelets using human PRL. Our novel findings demonstrate that hyperprolactinemia causes increased platelet aggregation via ADP stimulation both in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, our data indicate that PRL may be a physiological cofactor of the delicate coagulation balance during pregnancy and puerperium that might explain the increased risk of VTE in pregnant women around delivery. Further studies of the interaction between PRL and platelets will clarify the clinical relevance of hyperprolactinemia as a potential risk factor for VTE.

PRL as a novel potent cofactor for platelet aggregation.

Pregnancy (including puerperium) is a period of hypercoagulability and seems to be an independent major risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the basis of the increased risk of VTE in pregnancy and around delivery is unknown. We hypothesized that changes in PRL, which is a prominently increased hormone during pregnancy and lactation, might be involved in the activation of platelets. To investigate platelet functional abnormalities in pregnancy, we assessed the ADP-stimulated and nonstimulated P-selectin expression of platelets in 42 consecutive pregnant women, 22 normo- and hyperprolactinemic patients with pituitary tumors, and controls. In addition, the aggregation of platelets by human PRL in vitro was studied. We found a significant correlation between PRL values and ADP stimulation of platelets in pregnant women (r = 0.56; P < 0.0001) and patients with pituitary tumors (r = 0.57; P = 0.006). Hyperprolactinemic pregnant women or hyperprolactinemic patients with pituitary tumors revealed significantly higher ADP stimulation of platelets (P < 0.0001) than healthy controls or normoprolactinemic patients with pituitary tumors. These results were reconciled by increased in vitro stimulation and aggregation of platelets using human PRL. Our novel findings demonstrate that hyperprolactinemia causes increased platelet aggregation via ADP stimulation both in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, our data indicate that PRL may be a physiological cofactor of the delicate coagulation balance during pregnancy and puerperium that might explain the increased risk of VTE in pregnant women around delivery. Further studies of the interaction between PRL and platelets will clarify the clinical relevance of hyperprolactinemia as a potential risk factor for VTE.

Methionine synthase A2756G and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase A1298C polymorphisms are not risk factors for idiopathic venous thromboembolism.

Hyperhomocysteinemia is a defined risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Several polymorphisms of genes encoding for enzymes acting in the remethylation pathway of homocysteine metabolism, ie, methionine synthase (MS) A2756G, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T and MTHFR A1298C, can cause increased homocysteine levels particularly in patients with deficiencies of folic acid, vitamin B6, or B12 and hence be potential risk factors for VTE. Indeed, homozygous MTHFR C677T was shown to be a mild risk factor for VTE by some, but not by all, investigators. In this study, we assessed the risk exerted by MS A2756G and MTHFR A1298C in a cohort of patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism. Homozygosities for MS A2756G and MTHFR A1298C were not found to be statistically significant risk factors for VTE. In addition, no interactions were observed among MS A2756G, MTHFR A1298C and MTHFR C677T in conferring a risk of VTE.