Potential Immune-mediated Diseases Research Articles

Safety profile of the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine: Pooled analysis of two large randomised phase 3 trials

BackgroundThe ZOE-50 (NCT01165177) and ZOE-70 (NCT01165229) phase 3 clinical trials showed that the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) was ≥90% efficacious in preventing herpes zoster in adults. Here we present a comprehensive overview of the safety data from these studies. MethodsAdults aged ≥50 (ZOE-50) and ≥70 (ZOE-70) years were randomly vaccinated with RZV or placebo. Safety analyses were performed on the pooled total vaccinated cohort, consisting of participants receiving at least one dose of RZV or placebo. Solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) were collected for 7 and 30 days after each vaccination, respectively. Serious AEs (SAEs) were collected from the first vaccination until 12 months post-last dose. Fatal AEs, vaccination-related SAEs, and potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs) were collected during the entire study period. ResultsSafety was evaluated in 14,645 RZV and 14,660 placebo recipients. More RZV than placebo recipients reported unsolicited AEs (50.5% versus 32.0%); the difference was driven by transient injection site and solicited systemic reactions that were generally seen in the first week post-vaccination. The occurrence of overall SAEs (RZV: 10.1%; Placebo: 10.4%), fatal AEs (RZV: 4.3%; Placebo: 4.6%), and pIMDs (RZV: 1.2%; Placebo: 1.4%) was balanced between groups. The occurrence of possible exacerbations of pIMDs was rare and similar between groups. Overall, except for the expected local and systemic symptoms, the safety results were comparable between the RZV and Placebo groups irrespective of participant age, gender, or race. ConclusionsNo safety concerns arose, supporting the favorable benefit-risk profile of RZV.

149. Immunogenicity, Safety, and Post-hoc Efficacy Assessment of the Adjuvanted Recombinant Zoster Vaccine in Adults with Hematologic Malignancies: A Phase 3, Randomized Clinical Trial

BackgroundPatients with hematologic malignancies treated with anticancer immunosuppressive therapies (ITs) are at increased risk of herpes zoster (HZ). In a previous report of this phase 3, observer-blind, multicenter trial (NCT01767467), the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) was shown to be immunogenic and well-tolerated in ≥18 years of age patients with hematologic malignancies who completed or were undergoing anticancer IT.1 Here we report end-of-study results from the same trial.MethodsParticipants were randomized 1:1 to receive 2 doses of RZV or placebo (PL) 1–2 months apart, either ≥10 days before or after a cancer therapy cycle, or 10 days to 6 months after cancer therapy ended. Humoral and cell-mediated immune (CMI) responses were evaluated at 1 month and 12 months post-dose 2 (month 2 and month 13, respectively). Confirmatory objectives were to evaluate humoral response rate to RZV and to compare humoral immune responses to RZV and PL at month 2 excluding either subjects with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma (NHBCL), or only those with NHBCL. Efficacy against HZ was explored in a post-hoc analysis of confirmed HZ cases. Solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) were recorded for 7 and 30 days after each dose, respectively. Serious AEs (SAEs) and potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs) were recorded throughout the study.ResultsOf the 562 (RZV: 283, PL: 279) treated participants, 415 (RZV: 217, PL: 198)/310 (RZV: 168, PL: 142) were included in the according-to-protocol (ATP) cohort for humoral immunogenicity/immune persistence. The ATP sub-cohort for CMI included 132 (RZV: 69, PL: 63) participants at month 2 and 100 (RZV: 54, PL: 46) at month 13. All confirmatory immunogenicity objectives were met (Table 1). RZV efficacy against HZ, assessed post-hoc, was 87.2% (Table 2). RZV was more reactogenic than PL. The occurrence of unsolicited AEs, SAEs, and pIMDs was similar between the study groups (Table 3).ConclusionRZV induced robust humoral and cellular immune responses and showed an effect in the reduction of HZ incidence in patients with hematologic malignancies who completed or were undergoing anticancer IT. No safety concerns were identified.Reference1. Oostvogels et al. IDWeek2017, abs 1344. Funding. GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA.Disclosures A. F. Dagnew, GSK: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. J. Murphy, GSK: Investigator, Research support. S. A. McNeil, GSK group of companies: Grant Investigator, Research grant and Research support. B. Salaun, GSK group of companies: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. E. Di Paolo, GSK group of companies: Employee, Salary. L. Campora, GSK group of companies: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. M. López-Fauqued, GSK group of companies: Employee, Salary. M. El Idrissi, GSK group of companies: Employee, Salary. A. Schuind, GSK: Employee, Salary. T. C. Heineman, GSK group of companies: Consultant, Employee and Shareholder, Consulting fee and Salary. P. Van Den Steen, GSK: Employee and Shareholder, Restricted shares and Salary. L. Oostvogels, GSK: Employee, Salary and Stock and stock options.

1956. Persistence of Immune Response and Safety of an Adjuvanted Recombinant Zoster Vaccine in Older Adults Previously Vaccinated with a Live-Attenuated Herpes Zoster Vaccine: End-of-Study Results of a Phase III, Group-Matched, Clinical Trial

BackgroundHerpes zoster (HZ), caused by reactivation of varicella-zoster virus (VZV), typically manifests as a dermatomal rash and can result in complications, such as postherpetic neuralgia. HZ risk increases with age due to age-related decline of immunity. At time of study start, Zoster Vaccine Live (ZVL), containing live-attenuated VZV was recommended for vaccination in adults ≥60 years of age. Efficacy of ZVL declines with time since vaccination and increasing age. We evaluated immunogenicity and safety of Adjuvanted Recombinant Zoster Vaccine (RZV) containing truncated form of VZV glycoprotein E (gE) in adults vaccinated with ZVL ≥5 years before (HZ-PreVac) and ZVL-naïve adults (HZ-NonVac). In October 2017, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommended revaccination of ZVL recipients with RZV, based on available data, including 1 month (M) post-dose 2 results of this study (M3). Here we present immunogenicity and safety results up to 12 months post-dose 2 (M14).MethodsIn this phase III, multi-center study (NCT02581410), open-label, 2 parallel groups of group-matched adults ≥65 years of age, HZ-PreVac and HZ-NonVac, received 2 RZV doses 2 months apart. Humoral and cellular immune responses were evaluated at various time points up to M14. Solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) were recorded for 7 and 30 days post each dose, respectively. Serious AEs (SAEs), HZ cases and potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs) were recorded throughout the study.Results215 participants were vaccinated in each group. No apparent differences, in pre-vaccination and persistence values of the anti-gE antibody GMCs (Figure 1) and CD4[2+] T-cell frequencies (Figure 2) were observed between HZ-PreVac and HZ-NonVac, up to M14. No clinically relevant differences in frequencies of solicited AEs, unsolicited AEs or SAEs between the two groups were observed. Six pIMDs (two in HZ-PreVac group and four in HZ-NonVac group), were reported up to M14 (Table 1). ConclusionIn both groups, RZV-induced humoral and cellular immune responses persisted above baseline up to M14 at similar levels, irrespective of previous ZVL administration. Safety profile was similar regardless of previous ZVL vaccination. Funding: GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA.Disclosures T. Mrkvan, GSK: Employee and Shareholder, Salary and shares and share options. L. Campora, GSK: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. G. Catteau, GSK: Board Member, Salary. M. Douha, GSK: Employee, Salary. K. Grupping, GSK: Employee, Salary. C. Herve, GSK: Employee, Salary. G. Kalema, GSK: Consultant, Consulting fee. T. Heineman, GSK: Consultant, Employee and Shareholder, Consulting fee and Salary. N. P. Klein, GSK: Investigator, Research support. sanofi pasteur: Investigator, Research support. Merck: Investigator, Research support. Pfizer: Investigator, Research support. Protein Science: Investigator, Research support. MedImmune: Investigator, Research support. Dynavax: Investigator, Research support. H. Lal, GSK: Shareholder, Salary. Pfizer: Shareholder, Salary. L. Oostvogels, GSK: Employee, Salary and stock and stock options. A. Schuind, GSK: Employee and Shareholder, Salary.

2483. Twelve-Month Immunogenicity and Safety of an Adjuvanted Recombinant Zoster Vaccine in Immunosuppressed Adults Post Renal Transplant: a Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial

BackgroundThe efficacy of the non-live adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV, containing a truncated form of varicella-zoster glycoprotein E [gE] and Adjuvant System AS01B) is >90% in adults ≥50 years of age (YOA) (ZOE-50/70) and >68% in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients ≥18 YOA (ZOE-HSCT).1 This study (NCT02058589) evaluated immunogenicity and safety of RZV in renal transplant recipients ≥18 YOA receiving immunosuppressive therapy. Previously unreported reactogenicity and 12-month post-last dose safety and immune persistence data are presented.MethodsIn this phase III, 1:1 randomized, observer-blind, multicenter trial, patients received 2 doses of RZV or placebo. gE-specific immune responses were assessed at 1 (M2) and 12 (M13) months post-dose 2: humoral immunity by vaccine response rate (VRR) and geometric mean antibody concentration (GMC), and cell-mediated immunity (CMI) by VRR and CD4+ T-cell frequency. Solicited general and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) were collected 7 days pre-dose 1 as a within-participant control. Solicited and unsolicited AEs were also recorded for 7 and 30 days after each dose, respectively. Serious AEs (SAE) and potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs) were recorded up to study end (M13).ResultsHumoral and CMI in the RZV group persisted through M13 appearing higher in the RZV group vs. placebo (Table 1). The frequency of solicited local AEs and of general AEs myalgia and fever was higher in the RZV group vs. placebo and balanced between study groups for the other general AEs, pIMDs and SAEs (including allograft rejections) (Table 2, Figure 1). No concerns regarding renal function were reported. Suspected HZ cases were recorded among 2 RZV and 6 placebo recipients. In the RZV group, within-participant pre- and post-vaccination solicited general AEs were reported at similar rates for fatigue, gastrointestinal symptoms and headache, and higher rates post-vaccination for myalgia, shivering, and fever (Figure 1).ConclusionRZV was highly immunogenic, eliciting robust humoral and CMI that persisted up to 12 months in adult renal transplant recipients. No safety concerns were identified over a 1-year follow-up.Reference1. de la Serna, BMT Tandem Meeting 2018, abs LBA2. Funding: GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA Disclosures P. Vink, GSK group of companies: Employee and Shareholder, Salary and stock shares. S. J. Kim, GSK group of companies: Investigator, Research grant and Research support. M. Campins Marti, GSK group of companies: Consultant, Investigator, Scientific Advisor and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research grant and Speaker honorarium. D. Kumar, GSK group of companies: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. K. Doucette, GSK group of companies: Investigator, Research support. S. A. McNeil, GSK group of companies: Grant Investigator, Research grant and Research support. L. Campora, GSK group of companies: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. E. Di Paolo, GSK group of companies: Employee, Salary. M. El Idrissi, GSK group of companies: Employee, Salary. M. López-Fauqued, GSK group of companies: Employee, Salary. B. Salaun, GSK group of companies: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. T. Heineman, GSK group of companies: Consultant, Employee and Shareholder, Consulting fee and Salary. L. Oostvogels, GSK group of companies: Employee, Salary and stock and stock option.

Phase 2b Controlled Trial of M72/AS01E Vaccine to Prevent Tuberculosis

BackgroundA vaccine to interrupt the transmission of tuberculosis is needed.MethodsWe conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial of the M72/AS01E tuberculosis vaccine in Kenya, South Africa, and Zambia. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–negative adults 18 to 50 years of age with latent M. tuberculosis infection (by interferon-γ release assay) were randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) to receive two doses of either M72/AS01E or placebo intramuscularly 1 month apart. Most participants had previously received the bacille Calmette–Guérin vaccine. We assessed the safety of M72/AS01E and its efficacy against progression to bacteriologically confirmed active pulmonary tuberculosis disease. Clinical suspicion of tuberculosis was confirmed with sputum by means of a polymerase-chain-reaction test, mycobacterial culture, or both.ResultsWe report the primary analysis (conducted after a mean of 2.3 years of follow-up) of the ongoing trial. A total of 1786 participants received M72/AS01E and 1787 received placebo, and 1623 and 1660 participants in the respective groups were included in the according-to-protocol efficacy cohort. A total of 10 participants in the M72/AS01E group met the primary case definition (bacteriologically confirmed active pulmonary tuberculosis, with confirmation before treatment), as compared with 22 participants in the placebo group (incidence, 0.3 cases vs. 0.6 cases per 100 person-years). The vaccine efficacy was 54.0% (90% confidence interval [CI], 13.9 to 75.4; 95% CI, 2.9 to 78.2; P=0.04). Results for the total vaccinated efficacy cohort were similar (vaccine efficacy, 57.0%; 90% CI, 19.9 to 76.9; 95% CI, 9.7 to 79.5; P=0.03). There were more unsolicited reports of adverse events in the M72/AS01E group (67.4%) than in the placebo group (45.4%) within 30 days after injection, with the difference attributed mainly to injection-site reactions and influenza-like symptoms. Serious adverse events, potential immune-mediated diseases, and deaths occurred with similar frequencies in the two groups.ConclusionsM72/AS01E provided 54.0% protection for M. tuberculosis–infected adults against active pulmonary tuberculosis disease, without evident safety concerns. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals and Aeras; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01755598.)

Immunogenicity and Safety of an Adjuvanted Herpes Zoster Subunit Candidate Vaccine in Adults with Hematologic Malignancies: A Phase III, Randomized Clinical Trial

BackgroundHematologic malignancy (HM) patients receiving immunosuppressive cancer therapy (ICT) are at increased risk of herpes zoster (HZ). Currently, no HZ vaccine is indicated for immunocompromised patients. The HZ subunit vaccine candidate (HZ/su), containing recombinant varicella zoster virus glycoprotein E and AS01B Adjuvant System, showed >90% efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in immunocompetent adults in all age groups ≥50 years. Here we report HZ/su immunogenicity and safety in HM adults ≥18 years of age who completed or are undergoing ICT.MethodsIn this phase III, observer-blind, multicenter study (NCT01767467), participants were randomized 1:1 to receive HZ/su or placebo (2 doses, 1–2 months apart) ≥10 days pre- or post-ICT. Humoral and cell-mediated immunogenicity (CMI) were assessed. The co-primary immunogenicity objectives were to evaluate HZ/su vaccine response rate and compare the immune response to HZ/su and placebo in participants excluding those with non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma (NHBCL) or chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) at 1 month post-dose 2 (M2). Solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) were recorded for 7 and 30 days after each dose, respectively. Serious AEs (SAEs), disease-related events and potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs) were recorded throughout the study. Partial safety results up to 6 months post-dose 2 are shown (partially blinded, ongoing study).ResultsOf 562 participants (283 HZ/su 283; placebo 279), (mean age 57.3 [HZ/su 56.8; placebo 57.8] years), 415 were included in the according-to-protocol (ATP) cohort for humoral immunogenicity and 132 in the ATP sub-cohort for CMI. M2 immune responses were higher in the HZ/su group (Table 1). Both co-primary immunogenicity objectives were met (Figure 1). The most frequent local and general solicited AEs were pain and fatigue, reported by 48.2% and 47.8% of all participants (per-group data remain blinded). The frequency of unsolicited AEs, SAEs and pIMDs in the 2 groups was similar (Table 2).ConclusionHZ/su induced robust humoral and cellular immune responses at M2 in HM adults excluding NHBCL and CLL, who completed or are undergoing ICT. No safety concerns were observed up to 6 months post-dose 2.FundingGlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SADisclosures L. Oostvogels, GSK group of companies: Employee and Shareholder, Salary and Shares

Immunogenicity and Safety of an Adjuvanted Herpes Zoster Subunit Vaccine in Older Adults Previously Vaccinated with a Live-Attenuated Herpes Zoster Vaccine: A Phase III, Group-Matched, Clinical Trial

BackgroundHerpes zoster (HZ), caused by reactivation of varicella-zoster virus (VZV), typically manifests as a dermatomal rash and can lead to postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). HZ and PHN risk increase with age. Efficacy against HZ induced by a live-attenuated zoster vaccine (ZVL; Merck) declines following vaccination (21% in years 5–12 post-vaccination). To ensure protection, revaccination can be considered. Therefore, we assessed immunogenicity and safety of HZ/su, a non-live candidate vaccine containing VZV glycoprotein E (gE) subunit and AS01B adjuvant system (GSK), in adults previously vaccinated with ZVL ≥5 years before, (HZ-PreVac) compared with adults not vaccinated with ZVL (HZ-NonVac).MethodsIn this phase III, group-matched, open, multicenter study (NCT02581410), 2 parallel groups of adults ≥65 years of age (YOA) received 2 HZ/su doses 2 months apart. A co-primary objective was to compare humoral immune responses 1 month post-dose 2 (M3) in the 2 groups (non-inferiority criterion: upper limit [UL] of the 95% confidence interval [CI] for HZ-NonVac/HZ-PreVac adjusted anti-gE antibody geometric mean concentration [GMC] ratio <1.5). Humoral and cellular immune responses were evaluated at various time points. Solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) were recorded for 7 and 30 days post each dose, respectively. Serious AEs (SAEs), HZ cases and potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs) will be recorded until study end. Here, we present data up to M3, as the study is still ongoing.Results430 participants were vaccinated. M3 humoral immune responses in HZ-PreVac were non-inferior to those in HZ-NonVac and the co-primary objective was met as the UL of the 95% CI of the adjusted GMC ratio was 1.17 (Table 1). In addition, there were no apparent differences in CD4[2+] T-cell frequencies between groups (Figure 1). No clinically meaningful differences between frequencies of solicited AEs, unsolicited AEs or SAEs in the 2 groups were observed (Table 2). No SAEs considered vaccine-related by investigators, no suspected HZ cases and no pIMDs were reported up to M3.ConclusionHZ/su vaccination in adults ≥65 YOA who previously received ZVL stimulates strong immune responses and does not raise safety concerns.FundingGlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SADisclosures K. Grupping, GSK group of companies: Employee, Salary; L. Campora, GSK group of companies: Employee, Salary; M. Douha, GSK group of companies: Employee, Salary; T. C. Heineman, GSK group of companies: Consultant and Shareholder, Consulting fee; N. P. Klein, GSK group of companies: Investigator, Grant recipient sanofi pasteur: Investigator, Grant recipient; Merck & Co: Investigator, Grant recipient; MedImmune: Investigator, Grant recipient; Protein Science: Investigator, Grant recipient; Pfizer: Investigator, Grant recipient; H. Lal, Pfizer: Employee and Shareholder, Salary and Stock as part of compensation; GSK group of companies: Employee at the time of study and Shareholder, Salary and Stock as part of compensation; J. Peterson, GSK group of companies: Investigator, Principal investigator fees; L. Oostvogels, GSK group of companies: Employee and Shareholder, Salary and Shares

Immunogenicity and Safety of a Candidate Subunit Adjuvanted Herpes Zoster Vaccine (HZ/su) in Adults Post Renal Transplant: a Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial

BackgroundThe incidence rate of herpes zoster (HZ) in individuals with solid organ transplants (SOTs) is estimated as 8–9 times higher than the rate in the overall US population (3.2/1000 person-years). No vaccine is currently available to prevent HZ in immunocompromised individuals. GSK’s HZ/su candidate vaccine, containing varicella-zoster virus glycoprotein E (gE) and AS01B Adjuvant System, has shown >90% efficacy for HZ prevention in immunocompetent adults ≥50 years of age (YOA). We performed a study to determine immunogenicity and safety of HZ/su in adult renal transplant (RT) recipients (RTR) on chronic immunosuppressive therapy; RT was chosen as it can be representative of SOTs due to the nature of administered immunosuppressive therapies.MethodsIn this phase III, observer-blind, multicenter study (NCT02058589), RTRs ≥18 YOA were randomized 1:1 to receive 2 doses of HZ/su or placebo intramuscularly 1–2 months apart. gE-specific vaccine response rates (VRRs) and geometric means (GMs) were assessed for humoral and CD4+ cell-mediated immune (CMI) responses 1 month post dose 2 (M2). Solicited adverse events (AEs) were recorded for 7 days and unsolicited AEs and medically-attended AEs (MAEs) for 30 days after each dose. Solicited general and unsolicited AEs were also collected for 7 days prior to dose 1. Potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs) and serious AEs (SAEs) were recorded until 1 year post dose 2. Data from dose 1 through M2 is presented.ResultsAt M2, 240 subjects (121 HZ/su; 119 placebo) were included in the humoral immunogenicity according-to-protocol (ATP) cohort. All immunogenicity success criteria were met at M2 (Table 1). VRRs for ATP humoral immune cohort and CMI sub-cohort (72 subjects: 36 HZ/su; 36 placebo) were higher in HZ/su groups. Humoral GM concentrations and CMI GM frequencies were significantly higher in HZ/su compared with placebo groups. The frequency of AEs was higher in HZ/su vs. placebo groups for solicited local AEs, but similar for solicited general AEs, unsolicited AEs, MAEs and SAEs. No pIMDs, vaccine-related SAEs or transplant rejections were reported (Table 2).ConclusionHZ/su was highly immunogenic in adults with RT at M2. No safety concerns were identified.FundingGlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SADisclosures P. Vink, GSK group of companies: Employee, Salary and stock options and stock granted

Results of a Safety Pooled Analysis of an Adjuvanted Herpes Zoster Subunit Vaccine in More than 14,500 Participants Aged 50 Years or Older

BackgroundThe recombinant herpes zoster (HZ) subunit vaccine (HZ/su) has shown efficacy against HZ in adults ≥50 and ≥70 years of age (YOA), in two pivotal Phase III clinical trials (NCT01165177, NCT01165229). A pooled safety analysis of data from these two efficacy studies was performed, including a comparative analysis on HZ/su vs. placebo groups, to provide a comprehensive understanding of the HZ/su safety profile.MethodsTwo pivotal, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase III studies, assessed the efficacy, reactogenicity and safety of HZ/su, administered intramuscularly according to a 0, 2-month schedule. Solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) were collected for 7 and 30 days after each dose, respectively; serious AEs (SAEs) for 1 year after last dose; fatal and related SAEs and potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs) during the entire study period. Reactogenicity was assessed in a subset of participants; safety was assessed in all vaccinated participants.Results29,305 participants ≥50 YOA (HZ/su: 14,645; placebo: 14,660) were included in the pooled analysis. HZ/su was more reactogenic than placebo. Local reactions were mostly mild to moderate in intensity and transient (median duration = 3 days); the percentages of participants reporting SAEs, fatal SAEs and pIMDs were similar in both groups, at 30 days and 1 year after last dose (Figures 1 and 2). Percentages of fatal SAEs ranged between 4.3% (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 4.0–4.7) and 4.6% (95% CI: 4.3–5.0) and pIMDs between 1.2% (95% CI: 1.1–1.4) and 1.4% (95% CI: 1.2–1.6), in HZ/su and placebo groups, respectively. In both groups, the most frequent causes of death were neoplasms, cardiac disorders, and respiratory tract infections and infestations, and most frequent pIMDs were polymyalgia rheumatica, rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis.ConclusionNo safety concern was identified. Together with the high efficacy against HZ (97.2% [95% CI: 93.7–99.0],1 91.3% [95% CI: 86.8–94.5]2), the safety data supports a favorable benefit/risk profile of HZ/su in participants ≥50 YOA.FundingGlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SADisclosures M. López-Fauqued, GSK Biologicals’: Employee, Salary; L. Campora, GSK Biologicals’: Employee, Salary; F. Delannois, GSK Vaccines: Employee, Salary; M. El Idrissi, GSK Vaccines: Employee, Salary; E. Ledent, GSK Vaccines: Employee, Salary; J. Diez-Domingo, GSK Vaccines: Consultant and Investigator, Educational support and Research grant; J. McElhaney, GSK Vaccines: Scientific Advisor, Speaker honorarium; S. McNeil, GSK/Merck: Grant Investigator, Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee, Grant recipient, Research grant, Research support and Speaker honorarium; F. De Looze, GSK Vaccines: Investigator and Research Contractor, Research support; F. Tavares Da Silva, GSK Vaccines: Employee, restricted shares and Salary

Immunogenicity and Safety of a Candidate Subunit Adjuvanted Herpes Zoster Vaccine in Adults with Solid Tumors Vaccinated Before or During Immunosuppressive Chemotherapy Treatment: A Phase II/III, Randomized Clinical Trial

BackgroundNo herpes zoster (HZ) vaccine for immunosuppressed individuals is currently available. GSK’s candidate HZ vaccine containing recombinant varicella zoster virus glycoprotein E (gE) subunit and AS01B Adjuvant System (HZ/su) showed >90% efficacy for HZ prevention in immunocompetent adults aged ≥50 years. The HZ incidence in individuals with solid tumors (ST) receiving immunosuppressive chemotherapy (chemo) is estimated as 3–4 times higher than in the overall US population (3.2/1000 person-years). We present HZ/su immunogenicity and safety in ST adults aged ≥18 years.MethodsIn this phase II/III, observer-blind, multicenter study (NCT01798056), ST adults received 2 doses of HZ/su or placebo intramuscularly 1–2 months apart and were randomized 4:4:1:1 to receive a first dose 8–30 days (D) pre-chemo (HZ/su – HZ/su-PreC group, placebo – Pl-PreC) or on chemo start (±1 D) (HZ/su-OnC, Pl-OnC). Vaccine response rates (VRRs) and geometric means (GMs)/means were evaluated for gE humoral immune and gE-specific CD4+ cell-mediated immune (CMI) responses 1 month (M2) and 12 months (M13) post-dose 2. Solicited adverse events (AEs) were recorded for 7 D and unsolicited and medically-attended AEs (MAEs) for 30 D post each dose. Potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs) and serious AEs (SAEs) were recorded until study end.Results185 subjects (65 HZ/su-PreC, 78 Pl-PreC, 22 HZ/su-OnC, 20 Pl-OnC) were included in the according-to-protocol (ATP) cohort for humoral immunogenicity and 58 (27 HZ/su-PreC, 31 Pl-PreC) in the ATP sub-cohort for CMI. The most common ST were breast tumors (54% HZ/su, 49% placebo), followed by colorectal, lung, then other. Humoral and CMI VRRs were higher in HZ/su than Pl groups at M2 and M13. GM concentration (GMC) was highest at M2 in HZ/su-PreC. M13 GMCs were similar in the HZ/su-PreC and HZ/su-OnC groups (Table 1). The frequency of local solicited AEs was higher in HZ/su than Pl groups (Table 2); that of general solicited, unsolicited AEs, MAEs and SAEs was similar among groups (Table 3). 1 pIMD (Pl-OnC) and 23 fatal SAEs were reported. No SAE was considered vaccine-related by investigators.ConclusionHZ/su was highly immunogenic in ST adults receiving chemo. No safety concerns were raised.FundingGlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SADisclosures P. Vink, GSK group of companies: Employee, Salary and stock options and stock granted

Efficacy of the Herpes Zoster Subunit Vaccine in Adults 70 Years of Age or Older

BackgroundA trial involving adults 50 years of age or older (ZOE-50) showed that the herpes zoster subunit vaccine (HZ/su) containing recombinant varicella–zoster virus glycoprotein E and the AS01B adjuvant system was associated with a risk of herpes zoster that was 97.2% lower than that associated with placebo. A second trial was performed concurrently at the same sites and examined the safety and efficacy of HZ/su in adults 70 years of age or older (ZOE-70).MethodsThis randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial was conducted in 18 countries and involved adults 70 years of age or older. Participants received two doses of HZ/su or placebo (assigned in a 1:1 ratio) administered intramuscularly 2 months apart. Vaccine efficacy against herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia was assessed in participants from ZOE-70 and in participants pooled from ZOE-70 and ZOE-50.ResultsIn ZOE-70, 13,900 participants who could be evaluated (mean age, 75.6 years) received either HZ/su (6950 participants) or placebo (6950 participants). During a mean follow-up period of 3.7 years, herpes zoster occurred in 23 HZ/su recipients and in 223 placebo recipients (0.9 vs. 9.2 per 1000 person-years). Vaccine efficacy against herpes zoster was 89.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.2 to 93.7; P<0.001) and was similar in participants 70 to 79 years of age (90.0%) and participants 80 years of age or older (89.1%). In pooled analyses of data from participants 70 years of age or older in ZOE-50 and ZOE-70 (16,596 participants), vaccine efficacy against herpes zoster was 91.3% (95% CI, 86.8 to 94.5; P<0.001), and vaccine efficacy against postherpetic neuralgia was 88.8% (95% CI, 68.7 to 97.1; P<0.001). Solicited reports of injection-site and systemic reactions within 7 days after injection were more frequent among HZ/su recipients than among placebo recipients (79.0% vs. 29.5%). Serious adverse events, potential immune-mediated diseases, and deaths occurred with similar frequencies in the two study groups.ConclusionsIn our trial, HZ/su was found to reduce the risks of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia among adults 70 years of age or older. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals; ZOE-50 and ZOE-70 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01165177 and NCT01165229.)

Phase I, randomized, observer-blind, placebo-controlled studies to evaluate the safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of an investigational non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) protein vaccine in adults

BackgroundNon-typeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) is a major cause of various respiratory diseases. The development of an effective vaccine against NTHi mandates new approaches beyond conjugated vaccines as this opportunistic bacterium is non-encapsulated. Here we report on the safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of a multi-component investigational vaccine based on three conserved surface proteins from NTHi (proteins D [PD], E [PE] and Pilin A [PilA]) in two observer-blind phase I studies. MethodsIn the first study (NCT01657526), 48 healthy 18–40 year-olds received two vaccine formulations (10 or 30μg of each antigen [PD and a fusion protein PE-PilA]) or saline placebo at months 0 and 2. In the second study (NCT01678677), 270 50–70 year-olds, current or former smokers, received eight vaccine formulations (10 or 30μg antigen/dose non-adjuvanted or adjuvanted with alum, AS01E or AS04C) or saline placebo at months 0, 2 and 6 (plain and alum-adjuvanted groups) and at months 0 and 2 (AS-adjuvanted groups). Solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) were recorded for 7 and 30 days post-vaccination, respectively; potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs) and serious AEs (SAEs) throughout the studies. Humoral and antigen-specific T-cell immunity (in study 2 only) responses were assessed up to 12 months post-vaccination. ResultsObserved reactogenicity was highest in the AS-adjuvanted groups but no safety concerns were identified with any of the NTHi vaccine formulations. One fatal SAE (cardiac arrest) not considered related to vaccination, and one pIMD (non-serious psoriasis) in the Placebo group, were reported post-dose 3 in Study 2. All formulations generated a robust antibody response while the AS01-adjuvanted formulations produced the highest humoral and cellular immune responses. ConclusionThis study confirms that the NTHi vaccine formulations had an acceptable reactogenicity and safety profile and were immunogenic in adults. These results justify further clinical development of this NTHi vaccine candidate.

Efficacy of an Adjuvanted Herpes Zoster Subunit Vaccine in Older Adults

BackgroundIn previous phase 1–2 clinical trials involving older adults, a subunit vaccine containing varicella–zoster virus glycoprotein E and the AS01B adjuvant system (called HZ/su) had a clinically acceptable safety profile and elicited a robust immune response.MethodsWe conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study in 18 countries to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HZ/su in older adults (≥50 years of age), stratified according to age group (50 to 59, 60 to 69, and ≥70 years). Participants received two intramuscular doses of the vaccine or placebo 2 months apart. The primary objective was to assess the efficacy of the vaccine, as compared with placebo, in reducing the risk of herpes zoster in older adults.ResultsA total of 15,411 participants who could be evaluated received either the vaccine (7698 participants) or placebo (7713 participants). During a mean follow-up of 3.2 years, herpes zoster was confirmed in 6 participants in the vaccine group and in 210 participants in the placebo group (incidence rate, 0.3 vs. 9.1 per 1000 person-years) in the modified vaccinated cohort. Overall vaccine efficacy against herpes zoster was 97.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93.7 to 99.0; P<0.001). Vaccine efficacy was between 96.6% and 97.9% for all age groups. Solicited reports of injection-site and systemic reactions within 7 days after vaccination were more frequent in the vaccine group. There were solicited or unsolicited reports of grade 3 symptoms in 17.0% of vaccine recipients and 3.2% of placebo recipients. The proportions of participants who had serious adverse events or potential immune-mediated diseases or who died were similar in the two groups.ConclusionsThe HZ/su vaccine significantly reduced the risk of herpes zoster in adults who were 50 years of age or older. Vaccine efficacy in adults who were 70 years of age or older was similar to that in the other two age groups. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals; ZOE-50 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01165177.)

Safety and immunogenicity of an investigational 4-component Staphylococcus aureus vaccine with or without AS03B adjuvant: Results of a randomized phase I trial

We assessed the safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of a staphylococcal vaccine combining capsular polysaccharides types 5 and 8 (CPS5/8), conjugated to tetanus toxoid (TT), with mutated detoxified α-toxin (AT) and clumping factor A (ClfA). In this phase I, randomized, placebo-controlled, observer-blind trial (NCT01160172), 88 healthy 18- to 40-year-olds received CPS5-TT/CPS8-TT/AT/ClfA vaccine (5/5/10/10 μg or 10/10/30/30 μg dose, each with or without AS03B adjuvant) or saline, at months 0, 1, 6. Solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) were recorded for 7 and 30 d post-vaccination, respectively; potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs) and serious AEs (SAEs) were recorded throughout the study. Humoral and antigen-specific CD4+/CD8+ T-cell immunity were assessed from Day (D) 0 to D540 post-vaccination. The most frequently reported solicited local and general AEs were pain (78.6%–100% of subjects), fatigue (36.4%–93.3% of subjects post-dose 1–2) and headache (20%–44.4% of subjects post-dose 3). Overall, 4 SAEs and 2 potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs) (none fatal or vaccine-related) were reported. For each antigen, pre-vaccination seropositivity rates were high (85.7%–100%) and geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) in vaccine recipients sharply increased from D0 to D14, then plateaued to study end. Exploratory group comparisons suggested higher GMCs with higher dosage, without AS03B effect. Vaccine-induced antibodies were functional (CPS5 opsonophagocytic assays, and AT/ClfA inhibition assays). AT- and ClfA-specific CD4+ T-cells with Th0/Th1 cytokine profile were induced at low levels (median <0.05%) by each formulation (intracellular cytokine staining). In conclusion, no safety concerns were identified and each vaccine formulation induced robust humoral immune responses after the first vaccine dose.

Pooled analysis of large and long‐term safety data from the human papillomavirus‐16/18‐AS04‐adjuvanted vaccine clinical trial programme

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to further evaluate the safety of the human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18-AS04-adjuvanted vaccine (HPV-16/18-vaccine Cervarix®, GlaxoSmithKline, Belgium) through a pooled analysis of data from 42 completed/ongoing clinical studies.MethodsUnsolicited adverse events (AEs) were reported for 30 days after each dose. Medically significant conditions, serious AEs (SAEs), potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs) and pregnancy outcomes were captured until study completion. Events leading to subject withdrawal were reviewed. Relative risks compared incidences of spontaneous abortion and pIMDs in controlled studies.ResultsThirty one thousand one hundred seventy-three adolescent girls/women received HPV-16/18-vaccine alone (HPV group), 2166 received HPV-16/18-vaccine coadministered with another vaccine and 24 241 were controls. Mean follow-up was 39 months (range 0–113.3). Incidences of unsolicited AEs reported within 30 days after any dose were similar between HPV and Control groups (30.8%/29.7%). During the entire study period, reports of medically significant conditions (25.0%/28.3%) and SAEs (7.9%/9.3%) were also similarly distributed between groups. Deaths were rare: HPV (alone/coadministered) n = 25, controls n = 20 (n = 18 in blinded groups). pIMDs within 1 year were reported by 0.2% of HPV-16/18 vaccinees and controls. For each pIMD event category, no increased relative risks were reported for HPV-16/18 vaccinees versus controls. Coadministration did not change the overall safety profile. Pregnancy outcomes and withdrawal rates were similar between groups.ConclusionsAnalysis of safety data arising from 57 580 subjects and 96 704 HPV-16/18-vaccine doses shows that the incidences and distribution of AEs were similar among HPV-16/18-vaccine recipients and controls. No new safety signals were identified. The data confirm previous findings that HPV-16/18-vaccine has an acceptable benefit-risk profile in adolescent girls and adult women.

Post‐licensure safety surveillance for human papillomavirus‐16/18‐AS04‐adjuvanted vaccine: more than 4 years of experience

PurposeTo summarise post-licensure safety surveillance over more than 4 years of routine use of the human papillomavirus-16/18-AS04-adjuvanted vaccine (HPV-16/18 vaccine: Cervarix®, GlaxoSmithKline, Belgium).MethodsWe describe global post-licensure passive surveillance data based on routine pharmacovigilance from 18 May 2007 until 17 November 2011 and enhanced surveillance implemented during the 2-year national immunisation programme in the UK (school years 2008–2010).ResultsSpontaneous reports from countries worldwide showed a similar pattern for the most frequently reported adverse events after HPV-16/18 vaccination. No patterns or trends were observed for potential immune-mediated diseases after vaccination. Observed incidences of Bell's palsy and confirmed Guillain–Barré syndrome were within the expected range in the general population. Outcomes of pregnancy in women who were inadvertently exposed to HPV-16/18 vaccine during pregnancy, were in line with published reports for similar populations. Enhanced surveillance of adverse events in the UK triggered a review of cases of anaphylaxis, angioedema and syncope reports, leading to an update to the prescribing information.ConclusionCollaborative partnerships between industry and national regulatory agencies facilitated rapid notification and transfer of safety information, allowing for rapid responses in the event of a safety signal of adverse event of concern. More than 4 years of post-licensure experience may provide confidence to providers and the public about the safety profile of HPV-16/18 vaccine in routine use. The safety profile appears to be consistent with pre-licensure data reporting that HPV-16/18 vaccine has an acceptable benefit–risk profile in adolescent girls and women.