Potassium-competitive Acid Blocker Research Articles

Long-term Outcome of Asymptomatic Esophageal Eosinophilia.

: Asymptomatic esophageal eosinophilia (aEE), characterized by eosinophil infiltration in the esophagus without clinical symptoms, has been reported as a precursor of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Nevertheless, no report exists on the long-term clinical course of the disease. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the long-term clinical course of aEE over 5 years, including the symptomatic conversion rate and the effect of treatments. : We reviewed 28 patients with aEE who had been followed up for over 5 years with endoscopic monitoring. The basal characteristics of patients were compared with those of 58 patients diagnosed with EoE during the same period. Patients' clinicopathological findings were collected and examined. : No significant differences in basal characteristics and histopathological findings were observed between the patients with aEE and those with EoE. The median follow-up duration was 64 months. Among the 28 patients with aEE, seven were treated with proton pump inhibitor or potassium-competitive acid blocker and the remaining 21 opted for follow-up with no medication. Among the treated patients, six (85.7%) exhibited endoscopic and pathologic improvements. Among the cases followed up without medication, the findings worsened in two (9.5%), improved spontaneously in seven (33.3%), and were unchanged in 12 (57.1%), and three (14.3%) developed symptoms at a mean time of 40 months. Symptoms developed in cases where endoscopic and pathologic findings remained unchanged or worsened during follow-up. : Some patients with aEE had improved findings without treatment, whereas others developed symptoms, emphasizing the importance of long-term monitoring and individualized treatment decisions.

Differences Between Patients with Heartburn Refractory to Vonoprazan and Those Refractory to Proton Pump Inhibitors

BackgroundVonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, demonstrates more potent acid inhibition than proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of vonoprazan in patients with unproven gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) by comparing patients with vonoprazan-refractory heartburn with those with PPI-refractory heartburn.MethodsThis study included 104 consecutive patients with vonoprazan- or PPI-refractory heartburn (52 patients each), no erosive esophagitis on endoscopy and who underwent combined multichannel intraluminal impedance–pH (MII–pH) testing with vonoprazan/PPI discontinuation. Patients’ backgrounds, symptom scores from four questionnaires, MII–pH results and high-resolution manometry results were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe vonoprazan group demonstrated significantly higher GERD symptoms and scores of abdominal pain and diarrhea on the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale questionnaire. MII–pH results revealed that the vonoprazan group demonstrated 40.4%, 17.3%, and 42.3% and the PPIs group exhibited 26.9%, 17.3%, and 55.8% of abnormal acid reflux [true non-erosive reflux disease (NERD)], reflux hypersensitivity and functional heartburn, respectively. The vonoprazan group demonstrated higher true NERD rates but with no significant difference (p = 0.307). Among the vonoprazan group, eight patients with true NERD underwent another MII–pH test on vonoprazan, and all cases demonstrated normal acid exposure times (0.0% [0.0–0.3]).ConclusionPatients with unproven GERD with vonoprazan-refractory heartburn demonstrated more symptoms, including not only GERD symptoms but also functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome symptoms, than those with PPI-refractory heartburn.

Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Tegoprazan and the Combination of Clarithromycin, Amoxicillin and Bismuth in Healthy Chinese Subjects: An Open-Label, Single-Center, Multiple-Dosage, Self-Controlled, Phase I Trial.

Tegoprazan is a potassium-competitive acid blocker that inhibits gastric acid and which may be used for eradicating Helicobacter pylori. This study focuses on the pharmacokinetic interaction and safety between tegoprazan and the combination ofclarithromycin, amoxicillin and bismuth in healthy Chinese subjects. An open-label, three-period, single-center, multiple-dosage, single-sequence, phase I trial was conducted in 22 healthy subjects. In period 1, the subjects took tegoprazan 50 mg twice daily for 7 days, and in period 2 they were administered clarithromycin 500 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg and bismuth potassium citrate 600 mg twice daily for 7 days (days 14-20). Tegoprazan, clarithromycin, amoxicillin and bismuth potassium citrate were then administered in combination for 7 days (days 21-27) in period 3. Blood samples were collected up to 12h after the last dose of each period. Safety assessments were performed in each period. The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) [90% confidence interval (CI)] of maximum plasma concentration at steady state (Cmax,ss) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval (AUCτ) at steady state were 195.93% (175.52-218.71%) and 287.54% (263.28-314.04%) for tegoprazan and 423.23% (382.57-468.22%) and 385.61% (354.62-419.30%) for tegoprazan metabolite M1, respectively. The GMRs (90% CI) of Cmax,ss and AUCτ were 83.69% (77.44-90.45%) and 110.30% (102.74-118.41%) for clarithromycin, 126.25% (114.73-138.93%) and 146.94% (135.33-159.55%) for 14-hydroxyclarithromycin, 75.89% (69.73-82.60%) and 94.34% (87.94-101.20%) for amoxicillin, and 158.43% (125.43-200.11%) and 183.63% (156.42-215.58%) for bismuth, respectively. All reported adverse events were mild. The frequency of adverse events during the coadministration stage was not higher than that during the single- or triple-drug administration stages. The plasma exposure of tegoprazan, M1, 14-hydroxyclarithromycin and bismuth was increased after the coadministration of tegoprazan, clarithromycin, amoxicillin and bismuth. The coadministration exhibited favorable safety and tolerability. CTR20230643.

Dual acid-pump blocking as novel therapeutic approach to treatment of acid-related diseases

Proton-pump inhibitors are highly efficient in the treatment of acid-related disease; however, their efficacy in treating reflux symptoms, healing esophageal erosions and peptic ulcers and eradicating Helicobacter pylori is sometimes suboptimal. Potassium-competitive acid blockers have a different mechanism of action, resulting in higher and longer-lasting increases in intragastric pH, which is neither non-inferior or superior to those of proton-pump inhibitors. The pharmacology, metabolism and mechanism of action of these drugs are different, therefore, it is hypothesised, that their combined use might be of clinical benefit through increased intragastric pH. This hypothesis is supported by pharmacological, physiological and microbiological data. The combined administration of proton-pump inhibitors and potassium-competitive acid blockers should be investigated in short-term therapy (4–8 weeks); if their complementary or additive effect is proven, dual acid pump blocking can be of further benefit in managing gastroesophageal reflux disease, peptic ulcers and eradicating Helicobacter pylori infection, in cases refractory to current therapies. For safety reasons, long-term administration of this combination as maintenance treatment should be avoided.

Responses of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers According to Outcomes of Symptom, Endoscopy, and Histology in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

We aimed to examine the response rate to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and potassium-competitive acid blockers and the prevalence of topical corticosteroid (TCS) therapy as the second-line treatment for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Acid-suppressive drugs such as PPIs and potassium-competitive acid blockers are often used to treat EoE. Treatment response is based on outcomes including symptoms, endoscopy, and histology; however, the detailed response rate to PPI/P-CAB is unknown. In total, 236 patients with histologically confirmed EoE who received PPI/P-CAB as the first-line treatment were included. We assessed the symptoms, endoscopic reference score (EREFS), and histology [eosinophils per high-power field (eos/hpf)] 8 weeks after PPI/P-CAB administration. Complete normalization was defined as the disappearance of symptoms, EREFS score 0, or 0-1 eos/hpf, and response as disappearance or improvement of symptoms, EREFS score ≤2, or <15 eos/hpf. The prevalence of TCS therapy in each response group was assessed. Complete normalization was achieved in 25%, 50%, 36%, and 8% of patients for symptoms, endoscopy, histology, and all 3 outcomes, respectively. The response rates were 81%, 87%, 87%, 75%, and 60% for symptoms, endoscopy, histology, and all 3 outcomes, respectively. TCS use was significantly lower (8%) in patients who achieved response of all 3 outcomes than in other groups and was dependent on the number of outcomes with nonresponse. Complete normalization of symptoms, endoscopy, and histology using PPI/P-CAB is uncommon. Based on treatment efficacy by response/nonresponse, TCS was the secondary treatment in cases with an increase in the number of nonresponse outcomes.

Comparison of the efficacy between the dual therapy of tegoprazan and the quadruple therapy of tegoprazan: A randomized, controlled, multicenter study.

Tegoprazan (TPZ), a potassium-competitive acid blocker, exerts a strong acid-suppression effect and a rapid onset of action. However, research on TPZ-amoxicillin (TA) dual treatment is limited. Here, we compared the safety and efficacy of TPZ-amoxicillin dual treatment and TPZ, bismuth potassium citrate, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin (TBAC) quadruple therapy in patients newly diagnosed with H. pylori infection over a 14-day treatment period. A total of 236 patients newly diagnosed with H. pylori were enrolled in this multi-center, prospective, open-label, and randomized controlled study. Patients randomly received either TA dual or TBAC quadruple therapy. The incidence of adverse reactions and treatment compliance were recorded and then analyzed. The intention-to-treat analysis revealed that H. pylori-eradication rates were 83.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 78.2%-91.3%) and 81.4% (95% CI 74.2%-88.5%) for the TA and TBAC groups, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between them (P = 0.606). The per-protocol analysis revealed that the H. pylori-eradication rates were 88.3% and 84.8% for the TA and TBAC groups, respectively (P = 0.447). The incidence of adverse reactions was significantly lower in the TA group than in the TBAC group (4.2% vs. 15.3%, P = 0.004). Moreover, the TA group demonstrated substantially higher treatment compliance than the TBAC group (94.1% vs. 89.0%, P = 0.020). The TA dual therapy successfully eradicated H. pylori with a high eradication rate and a low incidence of adverse reactions. Therefore, this treatment is recommended as an alternative course for patients newly diagnosed with H. pylori infection.

Anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common diseases seen by gastroenterologists worldwide. A significant proportion of patients have a suboptimal response to acid inhibitors, especially proton pump inhibitors and potassium-competitive acid blockers. Due to concerns regarding the safety of long-term medication, many patients are unwilling to take lifelong medication. Endoscopic antireflux management offers a minimally invasive option for GERD patients. In recent decades, there have been several endoscopic antireflux therapies, including radiofrequency therapy, transoral fundoplication, and mucosal resection or mucosal ablation. Of these, antireflux mucosectomy (ARMS) is an effective and safe therapy for refractory GERD. This review provides an updated summary of antireflux mucosectomy.

Potassium-competitive acid blockers and acid-related disorders.

Potassium-competitive acid blockers (PCABs) represent a new class of compounds for the treatment of acid-related disorders. Recent FDA approval of the PCAB vonoprazan for erosive esophagitis has started an important new approach to acid-related disorders. Compared to conventional proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), PCABs provide more rapid, potent, and sustained suppression of gastric acid with faster and more durable symptom relief. Studies have demonstrated the efficacy of PCABs for erosive esophagitis, nonerosive reflux disease, and peptic ulcer disease including H. pylori. However, the PCAB vonoprazan was only approved in the US as part of combination therapy for eradication of H. pylori. Clinical trials have now demonstrated noninferiority of vonoprazan to lansoprazole for treatment of erosive esophagitis, particularly noting superiority of vonoprazan in patients with severe esophagitis resulting in FDA approval of vonoprazan for treatment of erosive esophagitis. Emerging data suggests a possible utility of vonoprazan for PPI-resistant gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and on-demand therapy for nonerosive reflux disease. Vonoprazan is generally well tolerated but long-term safety data is not well established. The PCAB vonoprazan is a newly FDA approved treatment option for erosive esophagitis. Its possible role in PPI-resistant GERD and nonerosive reflux disease warrants further investigation.

Comparison of vonoprazan-based dual therapy with vonoprazan-based bismuth quadruple therapy for treatment-naive patients with Helicobacter pylori infection: A propensity score matching analysis.

Vonoprazan, a novel acid suppressant and the first potassium-competitive acid blocker, has the potential to enhance the eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori due to its robust acid-suppressing capacity. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of vonoprazan-based dual therapy (vonoprazan-amoxicillin, VA) with vonoprazan-based bismuth quadruple therapy (VBQT) as a first-line treatment for H pylori infection. This retrospective single-center non-inferiority study was conducted in China. Treatment-naive H pylori-positive patients aged 18 to 80 received one of the 2 treatment regimens at our center. The VA group received vonoprazan 20 mg twice daily and amoxicillin 1000 mg 3 times daily for 14 days, whereas the VBQT group received vonoprazan 20 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, and bismuth potassium citrate 220 mg twice daily for 14 days. The eradication rate was evaluated 4 to 6 weeks after treatment using the carbon-13/14 urea breath test. Propensity score matching was used to analyze eradication rates, adverse events (AEs), and patient compliance between the 2 groups. Initially, 501 patients were included, and after propensity score analysis, 156 patients were selected for the study. Intention-to-treat analysis showed eradication rates of 87.2% (95% CI, 79.8-94.6%) for the VA group and 79.5% (95% CI, 70.5-88.4%) for the VBQT group (P = .195). Per-protocol analysis demonstrated rates of 94.4% (95% CI, 89.2-99.7%) for the VA group and 96.8% (95% CI, 92.4-100%) for the VBQT group (P = .507). Non-inferiority was confirmed between the 2 groups, with P values < .025. The VA group showed a lower rate of AEs (10.3% vs 17.9%, P = .250) compared to the VBQT group. There were no significant differences in patient compliance between the 2 groups. In treatment-naive patients with H pylori infection, both the 14-day VA and VBQT regimens demonstrated comparable efficacy, with excellent eradication rates. Moreover, due to reduced antibiotic usage, lower rate of AEs, and lower costs, VA dual therapy should be prioritized.

Manufacturing Process Development of Tegoprazan as a Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker (P-CAB)

Manufacturing Process Development of Tegoprazan as a Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker (P-CAB)

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori with potassium competitive acid blockers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infects over half the global population, causing gastrointestinal diseases like dyspepsia, gastritis, duodenitis, peptic ulcers, G-MALT lymphoma, and gastric adenocarcinoma. Eradicating H. pylori is crucial for treating and preventing these conditions. While conventional proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapy is effective, there's growing interest in longer acid suppression therapies. Potassium competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) triple and dual therapy are new regimens for H. pylori eradication. Initially used in Asian populations, vonoprazan (VPZ) has been recently Food and Drug Administration-approved for H. pylori eradication. To assess the efficacy of regimens containing P-CABs in eradicating H. pylori infection. This study, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis by searching MEDLINE and Scopus libraries for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) or observational studies with the following command: [("Helicobacter pylori" OR "H pylori") AND ("Treatment" OR "Therapy" OR "Eradication") AND ("Vonaprazan" OR "Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker" OR "P-CAB" OR "PCAB" OR "Revaprazan" OR "Linaprazan" OR "Soraprazan" OR "Tegoprazan")]. Studies comparing the efficacy of P-CABs-based treatment to classical PPIs in eradicating H. pylori were included. Exclusion criteria included case reports, case series, unpublished trials, or conference abstracts. Data variables encompassed age, diagnosis method, sample sizes, study duration, intervention and control, and H. pylori eradication method were gathered by two independent reviewers. Meta-analysis was performed in R software, and forest plots were generated. A total of 256 references were initially retrieved through the search command. Ultimately, fifteen studies (7 RCTs, 7 retrospective observational studies, and 1 comparative unique study) were included, comparing P-CAB triple therapy to PPI triple therapy. The intention-to-treat analysis involved 8049 patients, with 4471 in the P-CAB intervention group and 3578 in the PPI control group across these studies. The analysis revealed a significant difference in H. pylori eradication between VPZ triple therapy and PPI triple therapy in both RCTs and observational studies [risk ratio (RR) = 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11-1.22, P < 0.0001] and (RR = 1.13, 95%CI: 1.09-1.17, P < 0.0001], respectively. However, no significant difference was found between tegoprazan (TPZ) triple therapy and PPI triple therapy in both RCTs and observational studies (RR = 1.04, 95%CI: 0.93-1.16, P = 0.5) and (RR = 1.03, 95%CI: 0.97-1.10, P = 0.3), respectively. VPZ-based triple therapy outperformed conventional PPI-based triple therapy in eradicating H. pylori, positioning it as a highly effective first-line regimen. Additionally, TPZ-based triple therapy was non-inferior to classical PPI triple therapy.

Tegoprazan as a New Remedy for Gastrointestinal Diseases in Comparison with its Therapeutic Predecessors: A Mini-Review.

Potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs), such as tegoprazan, are a new and diverse class of drugs that can completely block the potassium-binding site of gastric H+/K+ ATPase, potentially overcoming the limitations of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs). A number of studies have compared the effectiveness as well as the safety profile of tegoprazan to PPIs and other P-CABs for the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases. The current review study evaluates the published works of literature related to clinical pharmacology and clinical trials of tegoprazan for the treatment of diseases related to the gastrointestinal tract. The findings of this study revealed that tegoprazan is safe and well-tolerated and can be used to treat a group of gastrointestinal diseases, including gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), and H. pylori infection.

A systematic review with meta‐analysis: Efficacy and safety of potassium‐competitive acid blocker compared with proton pump inhibitor in the maintenance of healed erosive esophagitis

AbstractIntroductionProton pump inhibitor (PPI) is the mainstay therapy for the maintenance of healed erosive esophagitis (EE). It is unknown whether potassium‐competitive acid blockers (PCABs) are more efficacious and safer than PPIs.MethodsOnly randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PCABs to PPIs in the maintenance of healing rates of endoscopically proven healed EE and indexed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL until 3 February 2024, were included. A fixed‐effects model meta‐analysis was performed to pool primary efficacy outcome (maintenance of healing rates at week 24) and safety data (any treatment‐emergent adverse event or TEAE). The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool.ResultsFour RCTs with a total of 2554 patients were eligible for inclusion. All trials were of low risk of bias. Compared to lansoprazole 15 mg, the maintenance rates of healed EE at week 24 were significantly higher with vonoprazan 10 mg (RR 1.13; 95% CI 1.07–1.19) and vonoprazan 20 mg (RR 1.15; 95% CI 1.10–1.21). Likewise, compared to lansoprazole 15 mg, any TEAEs were significantly greater with vonoprazan 20 mg (RR 1.10; 95% CI 1.01–1.20) but not vonoprazan 10 mg.ConclusionVonoprazan 10 and 20 mg were superior to lansoprazole 15 mg in the maintenance of the healing of EE. Any TEAEs were greater with vonoprazan 20 mg.

Potassium-competitive acid blocker-associated gastric mucosal lesions.

Since the introduction of vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB), it has been demonstrated to reversibly inhibit gastric acid secretion by engaging in potassium-competitive ionic binding to H+/K+-ATPase. In contrast, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) achieve H+/K+-ATPase inhibition through covalent binding to cysteine residues of the proton pump. Reported cases have indicated an emerging trend of P-CAB-related gastropathies, similar to those associated with PPIs, as well as unique gastropathies specific to P-CAB use, such as the identification of web-like mucus. Pathologically, parietal cell profusions, which show a positively correlated with hypergastrinemia, have a higher incidence in P-CAB users compared to PPI users. Thus, this review aims to summarize the endoscopic and pathological findings reported to date concerning P-CAB-related gastric mucosal lesions. Additionally, it seeks to discuss the differences between the PPIs and P-CABs in terms of the formation and frequency of associated gastropathies. This review highlights the evident differences in the mechanism of action and potency of acid inhibition between P-CABs and PPIs, notably contributing to differences in the formation and frequency of associated gastropathies. It emphasizes the necessity to distinguish between P-CAB-related and PPI-related gastropathies in the clinical setting.

THERAPEUTIC APPROACHES FOR ACID REDUCTION IN PATIENTS ADMITTED TO INTENSIVE CARE UNITS WITH A HISTORY OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE AT A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL IN PAKISTAN.

Introduction: Although the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in intensive care units is still unknown, the condition is on the rise all over the world. Patients in critical condition are especially susceptible to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) because of the many procedures and underlying illnesses they undergo. Pepsin levels in oral secretions, ambulatory monitoring, and pH measurement are among procedures that can be utilized in the diagnostic process. The most popular treatment methods consist of adjusting one's lifestyle and using medicine, mainly proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Methodology: An analysis of data collected from 96 critically sick patients who were getting acid-lowering medication was carried out in retrospective research that was carried out at a tertiary care hospital in AJK, Pakistan between June and December 2023. Results: Most patients were being treated in medical intensive care units (MICU), and the medications that were prescribed the most frequently were omeprazole and esomeprazole. Omeprazole and antacids were the primary maintenance medications that were administered at the time of discharge. Patients who were diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and those who were undergoing mechanical ventilation made up a sizeable share, with most of them receiving intravenous proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Both potassium-competitive acid blockers and omeprazole were shown to have equivalent levels of treatment efficacy, according to the findings. Conclusion: Most of trials in past have established esomeprazole being highlighted as having superiority in certain studies. On the other hand, newer possibilities such as GABA-B agonist baclofen and P-CABs offer potential lines of investigation. Even though developing medicines require more exploration for routine management, intravenous proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) continue to be the primary emergency treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in critical care.

Self-controlled Case Series Study for Acute Kidney Injury after Starting Proton Pump Inhibitors or Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker in Patients with Cancer Using a Large Claims Database.

To investigate the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with cancer following the initiation of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and potassium-competitive acid blocker (PCAB), considering sex and anti-cancer drug use. We conducted a self-controlled case-series study using the Japan Medical Data Center claims data from 12422 patients with cancer who were prescribed PPIs or PCAB between January 2017 and December 2019. Considering the timing of PPI or PCAB, control period (days -120 to -1), risk period 1 (days 0 to +30), and risk period 2 (days +31 to +365) were defined. To assess the incidence rate ratio (IRR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) as the risk ratio, we adjusted for anti-cancer drugs to assess the risk of AKI. Additionally, we also examined sex differences to identify the risk of AKI. AKI was observed in risk period 1 [2.05 (1.12-3.72), p = 0.0192], but a slight reduction was noted in risk period 2 [0.60 (0.36-1.00), p = 0.0481]. A sex-specific increase in the risk of AKI was observed only in males during risk period 1 [2.18 (1.10-4.32), p = 0.0260], with a reduction in risk period 2 [0.48 (0.26-0.89), p = 0.0200]. We identified an increased risk of AKI in patients with cancer starting PPIs or PCAB particularly in males within 30 d after PPI or PCAB initiation, emphasizing the need for vigilant monitoring and management of AKI in this patient population.

Vonoprazan: A Review in Helicobacter pylori Infection.

Treatment for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection, a leading cause of peptic ulcer disease and an important risk factor for gastric cancer and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma, is indicated whenever infection is identified. However, treatment success rates with current guideline-recommended proton-pump inhibitor (PPI)-based regimens remain suboptimal, with one potential factor associated with treatment failure being inadequate acid suppression. Vonoprazan (Voquezna®) is a first-in-class potassium-competitive acid blocker with the potential to provide potent and sustained acid suppression. Following clinical trials conducted mainly in Asia (supported by post-marketing experience from Asia) and the phaseIII PHALCON-HP trial conducted in the USA and Europe, vonoprazan is now approved in the USA for use in combination with amoxicillin (dual therapy) or amoxicillin and clarithromycin (triple therapy) for the treatment of H.pylori infection in adults. The vonoprazan-based dual and triple therapy regimens were generally well tolerated in PHALCON-HP. In addition, vonoprazan has advantages including a rapid onset of action and no food effect, making vonoprazan-based dual and triple therapy regimens valuable alternatives to standard PPI-based triple therapy in the treatment of H.pylori infection.

Predicting pharmacodynamic effects through early drug discovery with artificial intelligence-physiologically based pharmacokinetic (AI-PBPK) modelling.

A mechanism-based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model links the concentration-time profile of a drug with its therapeutic effects based on the underlying biological or physiological processes. Clinical endpoints play a pivotal role in drug development. Despite the substantial time and effort invested in screening drugs for favourable pharmacokinetic (PK) properties, they may not consistently yield optimal clinical outcomes. Furthermore, in the virtual compound screening phase, researchers cannot observe clinical outcomes in humans directly. These uncertainties prolong the process of drug development. As incorporation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into the physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PBPK) model can assist in forecasting pharmacodynamic (PD) effects within the human body, we introduce a methodology for utilizing the AI-PBPK platform to predict the PK and PD outcomes of target compounds in the early drug discovery stage. In this integrated platform, machine learning is used to predict the parameters for the model, and the mechanism-based PD model is used to predict the PD outcome through the PK results. This platform enables researchers to align the PK profile of a drug with desired PD effects at the early drug discovery stage. Case studies are presented to assess and compare five potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) compounds, after calibration and verification using vonoprazan and revaprazan.

Vonoprazan is superior to lansoprazole for healing of severe but not mild erosive esophagitis: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Healing rates of severe erosive esophagitis (EE; Los Angeles [LA] Grade C/D) in patients treated with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) is suboptimal (~60-70%). Vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, is suggested to have better healing rates in patients with severe EE. This meta-analysis compares the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan 20mg versus lansoprazole 30mg daily in healing EE, specifically in those with LA Grade C/D. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL on May 24, 2023. Studies that randomized EE patients to vonoprazan 20mg daily or lansoprazole 30mg daily and compared healing rates were included. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2 tool. The fixed-effect model was used to obtain the pooled efficacy and safety outcomes. Subgroup analysis was done to compare healing rates in mild (LA Grade A/B) versus severe EE and based on study location. Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with low risks of bias comprising 2208 participants were included. Vonoprazan 20mg was superior to lansoprazole 30mg daily in healing severe EE at all weeks (Week 2 RR 1.294 [95% CI 1.169-1.433], Week 4 1.160 [1.059-1.270], and Week 8 1.175 [95% CI 1.107-1.247]), but was similar for mild EE at all weeks (P-interaction<0.01). Vonoprazan 20mg was more efficacious than lansoprazole 30mg at Week 8 in Western versus Asian studies (P-interaction<0.01). Any, serious, and drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable between groups. Vonoprazan 20mg is superior to lansoprazole 30mg for healing severe EE but not mild EE. Vonoprazan 20mg daily has a similar safety profile to lansoprazole 30mg daily.

Comparative Efficacy of P-CAB vs Proton Pump Inhibitors for Grade C/D Esophagitis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Los Angeles grade C/D esophagitis is a severe manifestation of gastroesophageal reflux disease that require active treatment and close follow-up. Potassium competitive acid blockers (P-CAB) are promising alternatives to proton pump inhibitors (PPI). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of P-CAB and PPI in healing grade C/D esophagitis to aid clinical decision-making. A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Randomized controlled trials were eligible for inclusion if efficacy of P-CAB and PPI in healing grade C/D esophagitis was reported. Pooled risk ratios and risk difference with 95% credible intervals were used to summarize estimated effect of each comparison. The benefit of treatments was ranked using the surface under the cumulative probability ranking score. Of 5,876 articles identified in the database, 24 studies were eligible. Studies included incorporated 3 P-CAB (vonoprazan, tegoprazan, and keverprazan) and 6 PPI (lansoprazole, esomeprazole, omeprazole, rabeprazole extended-release (ER), pantoprazole, and dexlansoprazole). Based on the failure to achieve mucosal healing, 20 mg of vonoprazan q.d. ranked the first among PPI in initial and maintained healing of grade C/D esophagitis (surface under the cumulative probability ranking score = 0.89 and 0.87, respectively). Vonoprazan had similar risk of incurring adverse events, severe adverse events, and withdrawal to drug when compared with PPI. For those who attempted lower maintenance treatment dose, 10 mg of vonoprazan q.d. was a reasonable choice, considering its moderate efficacy and safety. Vonoprazan has considerable efficacy in initial and maintained healing of grade C/D esophagitis compared with PPI, with moderate short-term and long-term safety.