Post-workshop Questionnaires Research Articles

Pre-COVID19: Knowledge and Level of Vaccine Acceptance Among University Students

Vaccine confers acquired active immunity against many diseases. The emergence of anti-vaccine groups has reinstated the outbreak of many vaccine preventable diseases (VPD), which was once thought to be eradicated from the face of earth, mostly due to ever-present misinformation and disinformation spread through various channels of communications. Hence, public awareness on immunization is vital to prevent the re-emergence of VPD. In this study, we targeted students from Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) and aimed to obtain the level of awareness and perception regarding vaccination among these students. We acquired information on the knowledge of vaccines and the degree of acceptance of vaccines among the university students, and through educational intervention, including the Islamic view on vaccination, we aimed to increase their awareness on immunization and the adverse effects of anti-vaccination. The questionnaires used in the present study were validated by reliability analysis. The study was conducted for a duration of four months, from January to April 2019. A total of 929 respondents were interviewed, and the degree of acceptance on vaccination was at satisfactory level, and none of the students rejected vaccination. Out of 929 respondents, 36 attended the vaccine workshop to undergo the educational intervention, and were asked to refill the questionnaires, and the results of pre- and post-workshop questionnaires were compared. Vaccine workshop successfully improved the knowledge and awareness of the participants on vaccines. The number of participants who can explain herd immunity has also increased. However, there were participants who still believed that vaccine-related information retrieved from social media can be trusted without consideration. Therefore, educational intervention is suggested to be used in public as a tool to combat the expansion of the anti-vaccination community since it was shown to give positive outcomes among the students.

Empowering Communication in Medicine: A Workshop Approach to Improve Presentation Skills for Ear, Nose, and Throat Specialists.

Introduction Effective communication is crucial for healthcare professionals, impacting patient care and interdisciplinary collaboration. However, medical education often lacks structured training in communication and presentation techniques. Herein, we evaluate the efficacy of structured workshops aimed at enhancing presentation skills among ear, nose, and throat (ENT) doctors through training in visual material design and concise verbal communication, including elevator pitches. Methods Two two-hour workshops were conducted for 23 ENT doctors under 50 years old, each with over 10 years of experience. The first workshop focused on creating effective visual aids, whereas the second targeted verbal communication skills. The questionnaire was administered before and after the workshops. Pre- and post-workshop questionnaires, using a 10-point Likert scale, evaluated participants' self-perceived abilities. Results The first workshop led to significant improvement in creating visually appealing and informative slides, using appropriate color schemes, and incorporating concrete examples. Despite a positive correlation with prior experience, time management did not improve significantly. The second workshop revealed significant gains in verbal communication skills, including concise messaging, audience engagement, and the effective use of storytelling techniques. Participants improved their ability to streamline information, maintain a conversational tone, and use eye contact and gestures effectively. Conclusion This study demonstrated that structured workshops significantly improved the presentation skills of ENT doctors, particularly in visual material design and verbal communication. Integrating such training into medical education and professional development can enhance patient care and interdisciplinary collaboration by fostering clear, effective communication among healthcare providers.

Physical Therapist-Led Initiatives for the Prevention and Improvement of Chronic Pain Among Workers: A Case Study of Hosting Workshops Based on Survey Results in a Corporate Setting.

Industrial physical therapy (IPT) interventions by physical therapists can enhance labor productivity. However, in Japan, there is a scarcity of case studies involving corporate visits, questionnaire-based data, and insights into corporate demands. Addressing this gap is vital for improving presenteeism related to chronic pain and increasing employees' health literacy, thereby advancing corporate health management. This case study evaluates the effectiveness of a workshop aimed at preventing and reducing chronic pain among employees in the Development Department of Company A, an information technology (IT) firm. The research employed pre- and post-survey questionnaires, workshop interventions, and meetings with corporate management to assess the current state of musculoskeletal chronic pain and productivity losses and to verify the intervention's effectiveness. Approximately 50 participants attended the workshop in person, while around 30 participated online, totaling 80 attendees. A total of 56 (51 men and 5 women) individuals responded to the pre-workshop questionnaire, and 28 responded to the post-workshop questionnaire. The age distribution of the 56 pre-survey respondents was as follows: 9 in their twenties, 13 in their thirties, 22 in their forties, and 12 aged 50 and older. Preliminary survey results showed that 55.4% of participants experienced chronic pain in at least one body part. The average presenteeism value was 82.8% (standard deviation = 16.8). It was also found that literacy regarding appropriate pain management strategies was low. An independent t-test comparing literacy scores based on the presence or absence of pain showed no significant differences (p = 0.34). Additionally, a one-way ANOVA conducted to examine differences across four age groups revealed no significant differences (F = 0.934, p = 0.431). Results from the post-workshop questionnaires indicated that more than 70% of the employees experienced an increase in understanding and satisfaction, with positive feedback on the improvement of knowledge about chronic pain mechanisms and posture. However, there were also requests for more interactive communication and a desire to learn more about specific care methods, suggesting the need to provide interventions tailored to appropriate stages of preventive medicine.

Students perceptions & motivation for ‘Basic Pranic Healing workshop’ and its impact on the well-being of medical students

Pranic Healing (PH) is an ancient energy healing method focusing on the body's energy fields. The study explores its potential positive impact on the well-being of medical students. Existing research supports the transformative effects of PH on molecular structures and overall well-being. Spiritual well-being has been linked to mental health, and the study aims to evaluate the connection between Basic Pranic Healing workshops and students' mental health in a stressful medical school environment.This retrospective observational pilot study recruited 50 medical students through purposive sampling. Participants from Dr. Baba Saheb Ambedkar Medical College, Delhi, India, completed pre and post-workshop questionnaires, assessing knowledge, attitude, interest, motivation, and impact on well-being. Data were analyzed using SPSS, employing descriptive statistics and relevant tests.45 interested students participated, with a mean age of 20.78±2.09, 68.8% female. Significant improvements were observed in pre and post-workshop scores for knowledge (p = 0.00), interest (p = 0.00), and confidence (p = 0.00). Beliefs shifted positively with a final favorable perception . Participants reported a positive impact on various life domains with 56% practicing learned techniques weekly. Efficacy in healing (73.4%) and self-healing (84.4%) was notable The Basic Pranic Healing workshop effectively enhanced participants' knowledge, interest, confidence, beliefs, and overall perceptions. Positive impacts on various life domains and high success rates in healing demonstrate the practical relevance of Pranic Healing in promoting well-being. Findings support the integration of holistic healing practices in healthcare training and personal development programs.

Building Connections: The Impact of Digital Storytelling on Communication and Leadership Skills Among Disabled Young Adults

Digital storytelling has been applied in research in varied contexts and with varied purposes. Implicit in the process of digital storytelling is the potential to develop and/or enhance a range of individual skills (e.g., multimedia, literacy, communication, etc.). However, further research is needed to gain a deeper understanding of the potential impact of digital storytelling on skill enhancement for disabled youth. This paper provides an overview of Phase 1 of the study “My life. My story: The Youth Digital Storytelling Project” that utilized elements of a community-based participatory action research approach to host a peer-facilitated digital storytelling workshop for young adults with developmental disabilities aimed at capturing and sharing their lived experiences with, knowledge of, and perspectives on significant life-stage transitions in the areas of education, employment, or living. The results from the pre- and post-workshop questionnaires suggest that the participants improved skills in media literacy, communication, and leadership. Additionally, the participants highlighted the importance of considering the delivery format, fostering connections, and enhancing self-confidence in the development of the workshop’s design and delivery. This research adds to the extant literature demonstrating the potential of digital storytelling as a pedagogical tool, offering implications for the design and implementation of online workshops for disabled youth.

Emphasizing Patient-Centricity Through a Tailored Training Program to Empower Patients, Advocates, and Ethics Committees in Good Clinical Practice.

Good Clinical Practices (GCP) are essential for patient-centric research. The standard bioethics and GCP training emphasizing a "one-size-fits-all" approach may not adequately equip ethics committee members, especially the lay and social scientist members, towards their critical role in reviewing clinical trials and related documentation. This article explores a patient-centered, patient advocates-driven training program focused on raising awareness about research ethics and GCP among patients, advocates and ethics committee members. A patient advocates-driven program called Patient Advocates for Clinical Research (PACER) conducted trainings focused on GCP for patient-centric research for patients, advocates and ethics committee members. Pre- and post-workshop questionnaires were used to assess the participants' knowledge of GCP. The workshop was attended by 116 participants. Of these 91 consented to participate in questionnaire evaluation that assessed participants' knowledge on ethics committee (EC) functionality, research ethics and data confidentiality. Pre-workshop evaluations highlighted knowledge gaps. Only 16.5% were familiar with the primary ethical consideration for vulnerable populations and 69.2% were knowledgeable about data governance. Post-workshop evaluations demonstrated significant overall response improvement of 5.4% (𝜒2=13.890; p<0.001). The understanding of ethical considerations for vulnerable populations rose by 15.4% (p=0.007), and knowledge of data privacy regulations improved by 11.0% (p=0.041). The workshop under PACER initiative highlighted the knowledge gaps in understanding the EC functionality, research ethics and data confidentiality. The workshop effectively fostered participants' understanding of ethical research practices.

1170 Bridging the Gap in Surgical Robotics Education

Abstract Aim Despite rapid evolution of surgical robotics systems, training opportunities are very limited especially for medical students and junior doctors. We organised a free-of-charge regional robotics workshop in collaboration with CMR Surgical with the goal of increasing exposure to surgical robotics technology. We also evaluated the delegates’ perception on current surgical robotics training and the workshop. Method CMR Surgical was invited to exhibit their Versius® robot and Virtual-Reality trainer for a one-day workshop at Glenfield Hospital, Leicester. The workshop was advertised across universities and hospital trusts in East Midlands. Registration form included pre-workshop questionnaire which assessed the motivation and barriers to attending surgical robotics courses, and their familiarity with robotics surgery. After 1-hour hands-on exercise supervised by consultants and CMR Surgical trainers, delegates were asked to complete post-workshop questionnaire to evaluate shift in familiarity, interest, and confidence in basic robotic skills. Results 75 delegates registered with 93% having never attended similar workshop before and the barriers were perceiving that robotics surgery skills are for advanced surgeons only (37%), cost (26%), no accessible courses (24%), time constraints (9%) and others (4%). The primary motivation to attend this workshop were learning basic robotic skills (49%), exploring innovative technology (44%) and networking (7%). 30 delegates were shortlisted for 1-hour hands-on experience into six groups consisting of 18 students and 12 junior doctors. Post-workshop feedback showed a positive shift in familiarity, interest, and confidence in basic robotic skills. Delegates also expressed increased interest in surgical specialties after this workshop. They also found VR station was enjoyable and believed it has potential in training future robotic surgeons. Conclusions These findings highlight the feasibility and importance of creating accessible training opportunities to bridge the gap in surgical robotics education.

Understanding EFL students’ use of self-made AI chatbots as personalized writing assistance tools: A mixed methods study

Understanding EFL students’ use of self-made AI chatbots as personalized writing assistance tools: A mixed methods study

Navigating merits and limits on the current perspectives and ethical challenges in the utilization of artificial intelligence in psychiatry – An exploratory mixed methods study

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in psychiatry presents opportunities for enhancing patient care but raises significant ethical concerns and challenges in clinical application. Addressing these challenges necessitates an informed and ethically aware psychiatric workforce capable of integrating AI into practice responsibly. A mixed-methods study was conducted to assess the outcomes of the "CONNECT with AI" - (Collaborative Opportunity to Navigate and Negotiate Ethical Challenges and Trials with Artificial Intelligence) workshop, aimed at exploring AI's ethical implications and applications in psychiatry. This workshop featured presentations, discussions, and scenario analyses focusing on AI's role in mental health care. Pre- and post-workshop questionnaires and focus group discussions evaluated participants' perspectives, and ethical understanding regarding AI in psychiatry. Participants exhibited a cautious optimism towards AI, recognizing its potential to augment mental health care while expressing concerns over ethical usage, patient-doctor relationships, and AI's practical application in patient care. The workshop significantly improved participants' ethical understanding, highlighting a substantial knowledge gap and the need for further education in AI among psychiatrists. The study underscores the necessity of continuous education and ethical guideline development for psychiatrists in the era of AI, emphasizing collaborative efforts in AI system design to ensure they meet clinical needs ethically and effectively. Future initiatives should aim to broaden psychiatrists' exposure to AI, fostering a deeper understanding and integration of AI technologies in psychiatric practice.

The effectiveness of psychiatric genetic counseling training: An analysis of 13 international workshops.

Studies have consistently shown that psychiatric genetic counseling (pGC) helps people with psychiatric conditions by increasing empowerment and self-efficacy, and addressing emotions like guilt. Yet, it is not routinely provided. Genetic counselors and trainees express low confidence in their ability to provide meaningful pGC, especially in the absence of adequate training. Therefore, to address this gap a "Psychiatric Genetic Counseling for Genetic Counselors" (PG4GC) workshop was developed and delivered to 13 groups of participants (primarily qualified genetic counselors and trainees) between 2015 and 2023 (10 workshops were delivered in-person, and three virtually). Participants completed quantitative questionnaires both before and after completing the workshop to assess their comfort, knowledge, behavior, and feeling of being equipped to provide pGC. In total, 232 individuals completed the pre-workshop questionnaire and 154 completed the post-workshop questionnaire. Participants felt more comfortable, knowledgeable, and equipped to provide pGC, and reported being more likely to address psychiatric concerns after the workshop, regardless of whether they were trainees or practicing professionals and whether they completed the workshop in-person or virtually. This study suggests that the PG4GC workshop is an effective educational tool in pGC training that may aid in broader implementation of the service.

Reimagining human dissection in preclinical medical education using studio-based learning: A retrospective pilot study.

Human dissections in the current medical curriculum are conducted using a checklist approach to prioritize the exposure of anatomical structures. In this setting, anatomy educators are labored to enhance their engagement during the dissection. To address this issue, we considered the current medical education pedagogies and identified a novel approach of studio-based learning (SBL) for application in a Human Dissection Workshop. This study aimed to (1) evaluate students' perceptions of SBL, (2) appraise the impact of SBL on anatomical knowledge learning, and (3) interpret the results of a validated questionnaire. Workshop participants were recruited from Year 2 medical students at the Chinese University of Hong Kong from the 2020 and 2021 cohorts. Fifty-one students participated in the workshop (N = 24 [2020], N = 27 [2021]), and 50 of them completed the postworkshop questionnaire rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Nineteen items were validated using a factor analysis. The interpretation of the questionnaire results demonstrated the different learning outcomes of the workshop, which included (1) enhancing students' knowledge and spatial understanding of anatomical structures, (2) strengthening students' appreciation of gross pathologies and clinical relevance, and (3) promoting higher-order thinking skills. To our knowledge, this is the first study to introduce SBL in medical education. The successful implementation of the workshop reflects the promising potential of SBL for enhancing human dissection and supplementing the medical curriculum.

Education Initiative for Essential Conversations with Parents-Serious Illness Guide for Pediatrics (SICG-Peds©-Peds).

To explore whether training on the SICG-Peds© (Serious Illness Guide for Pediatrics) impacts a pediatric clinician's confidence and knowledge in participating and initiating/leading difficult conversations with families of children living with a serious illness. Over 2 years, clinicians from BC and Ontario who care for children with serious illnesses attended training workshops on the SICG-Peds©. These workshops were evaluated using pre- and post-workshop questionnaires. Participants reported confidence scores on a scale of 1 to 10. In total, 134 and 140 clinicians attended the workshops in BC and Ontario, respectively. The majority of clinicians who completed the immediate post-workshop survey (N = 223, 94.5%), responded that the content enhanced their knowledge about pediatric serious illness conversations (SIC). Confidence scores in initiating/leading a SIC significantly increased from median 5 (interquartile range [IQR] 3-7) pre-workshop to 7 (IQR 7-9) immediately post-workshop (P < .0001). Confidence scores in participating as a non-leader in a SIC also significantly increased from median 7 (IQR 6-9) pre-workshop to median 8 (IQR 7-9) immediately post-workshop (P < .0001). Overall, these workshops significantly improved participants' confidence. Effectiveness and knowledge enhancement were other areas where the majority of participants reported positive improvements. Areas for continued support were identified as more mentoring, and training for supporting the guide's use in a clinical setting.

Neurosurgery training camp for medical student: experience of the Turkish neurosugery academy and Bursa Uludag University.

To highlight the importance of hands-on experiences and mentorship in shaping the future workforce of specialized medical professionals via a Neurosurgery Training Camp. Responses of the questionnaire regarding the Neurosurgery Training Camp organized by Bursa Uludag University's Faculty of Medicine and the Turkish Neurosurgery Academy were reviewed retrospectively. A one-day program was organized to introduce neurosurgery to medical students. During the camp, the students participated in interactive presentations delivered by faculty members, had lunch together, became acquainted with neurosurgical tools and technologies, and performed interventions. With pre and postworkshop questionnaire, student's expectations and thoughts about camp was evaluated. Forty-one students from 10 medical schools, spanning every year of study, attended the camp. Approximately 39% of the attendees (n = 16) were women and 61% (n = 25) were men. The post-workshop survey results demonstrated that 73% of the students (n = 30) were inclined to pursue a career in neurosurgery after the camp, 21.9% (n = 9) remained undecided, and 4.8% (n = 2) chose not to pursue neurosurgery. Feedback from the post-workshop questionnaire highlighted that all students perceived the camp as beneficial in providing insights into their future careers and aiding in making a decision regarding their career paths. The neurosurgical training camp effectively inspired and educated medical students about the discipline of neurosurgery. Furthermore, the camp effectively altered the career aspirations and perceptions of neurosurgery among the participating students.

Professional learning in primary science: developing teacher confidence to improve the leadership of teaching and learning

ABSTRACT The worrying decline in the status of primary school science in schools in England has been linked to low teacher confidence in teaching science and to schools being heavily focused on achievement in English and mathematics. This article reports on a novel professional learning strategy that was provided for 23 primary science leaders over five half-day workshops. Workshops focused on key topics that teachers reported having least confidence in teaching. Through a structured series of learning episodes, each workshop included knowledge and skills acquisition, opportunities to apply new knowledge and skills to primary-focused practicals, the introduction and application of scientific vocabulary, discussion and reflection time. Findings from pre- and post-workshop questionnaires undertaken with all participants and in-depth interviews with eight participants were examined from a phenomenological perspective. Participants reported that the workshops had significant and positive influences on raising their ability to teach science effectively and to build their confidence in leading colleagues. Participants also reported that the status of science in their schools had been improved.

Preparing undergraduate health students to navigate interprofessional education: The role of a workshop on psychological safety

The current paper outlines the development and delivery of an invitational workshop on psychological safety. The workshop was developed to better prepare undergraduate health education students for interprofessional collaboration. The invitational workshop was designed and delivered to a class of 94 undergraduate students in their second year of a Medical Radiation Sciences program. The workshop consisted of an icebreaker activity, a theory section, a second activity to reinforce learning, and a final debrief. Pre, post, and follow-up questionnaires with 5-point Likert scale items were integrated into the course to assess changes in students' understanding of psychological safety and their perspectives on the workshop. Ninety-one students completed the post-workshop questionnaire for a response rate of 96.8%, while 81 students (86.2%) completed the pre-workshop questionnaire, and 74 students (78.7%) completed the follow-up questionnaire. Generally, students had a much stronger understanding of psychological safety (40.2% vs. 95.6%; p<0.0001) and the value that it holds in team functioning (78.0% vs. 98.9%; p<0.0003) after they had been formally introduced to the topic, were more aware of strategies to establish inclusion and trust among members of a team (43.7% vs. 88.2%; p<0.0001), and felt more comfortable sharing or voicing their opinions in group settings thereafter (28.0% vs. 41.3%; p<0.0003). Outcomes from the workshop suggest that integrated education on psychological safety allows for long standing retention of knowledge and benefits students by enabling them to communicate more effectively within interprofessional teams using the knowledge, strategies, and comfort gained.

Enhancing Specialist Training in Radiation Oncology through the Implementation of Structured Radiotherapy Contouring Workshops

Contouring tumor volumes and organs at risk is a key component of Radiation Oncology specialist training. As trainees rotate through different tumor sites, they are expected to develop proficiency in contouring skills relevant to their year of training. These skills have historically been acquired in an unstructured manner during supervised clinical work. However, trainees often struggle to learn these skills due to variability in practice and approach amongst senior colleagues. Research has shown that contouring workshops improve the standardization of contouring and can be an effective way of enhancing the learning experience through interaction, instant feedback and reflection. We present our experience of implementing structured contouring workshops and the feedback received from the trainees. Eight contouring workshops were held in our institution over a period of 3 years between 2019 and 2022. These included Head & Neck (3), Prostate (1), SABR Lung (2), Breast (1), and Esophagus (1). Six were held in-person pre-COVID and two in a virtual format during the pandemic. Each workshop was 2 hours long and attended by trainees with varying levels of contouring experience. All the workshops were facilitated by a consultant radiation oncologist and a clinical tutor and followed a similar format consisting of a brief tutorial on the tumor site, followed by a contouring demonstration on an anonymized case on an Eclipse planning platform referencing published contouring atlases. Each of the trainees had access to a copy of the same case throughout the workshop and their contours were then reviewed both individually and collectively. A key component of the workshops was instant feedback, as trainees could compare their contours to that of the tutors and discuss any differences. Feedback on the contouring workshop was then collected through a post workshop questionnaire. The workshops were attended by an average of 12 trainees (range 10 to 14). Regardless of their year of training, all trainees rated the content and format of the workshops highly and stated they were relevant to their daily practice. Their subjective level of confidence in contouring in that specific tumor site improved significantly, going from an average of 5.6 out of 10 (range of 4 to 7) before the workshop to 8.7 (range of 8 to 9) after the 8 workshops. All the workshops were conducted at no extra cost as they were held using our existing planning software. The trainees indicated that the workshops were of definite educational benefit and strongly supported incorporating this approach to teaching contouring skills into the curriculum. Based on this feedback, these contouring workshops have been integrated into the recently revised higher specialist training curriculum on a more structured basis. This will ensure that trainees will continue to develop progressive expertise in contouring skills in keeping with best international practice as they advance through their training scheme.

99 Feasibility of a Co-designed Community Intervention for Families of Children with Developmental Diagnoses

Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic has created considerable difficulties and barriers to accessing care for families of children with developmental disability (FCDD), particularly for families who are socially or economically marginalized. We have previously found that families have reported increased caregiver stress, difficulty navigating services and worsened social isolation. Building on these findings, a community-based intervention was co-created with community partners and families to improve social support, caregiver empowerment and access to services (see Figure 1, below), consisting of a ‘toolkit’ of resources with an accompanying workshop for caregivers and community service providers (CSPs), and a chat group community of support for caregivers. Objectives This study explored the feasibility of the co-designed intervention, examining the acceptability, implementation, and demand. Design/Methods This was a mixed-methods feasibility study, which incorporated quantitative and qualitative evaluation components, and received Research Ethics Board approval (SMH 20-127). Demand and implementation were assessed by measuring participant attendance in the workshops. Acceptability was assessed using post-workshop questionnaires to measure satisfaction and knowledge uptake, and further explored in semi-structured interviews, which were recorded, transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis. Any caregiver, and CSPs who participated in any arm of the intervention, were invited to participate. Results Workshops were held 6 times (4 caregiver workshops, 2 staff workshops) in two community partner sites. A total of 55 participants (32 caregivers, 23 staff) participated. After receiving the toolkit and attending the workshop, both caregivers and CSPs reported that they felt more comfortable with navigating services, which was higher in CSPs (4.58/5, p&amp;lt;0.005). 100% of participants wanted additional iterations of the workshops with the toolkit. In the IDIs, both CSPs and caregivers reported that the toolkit was comprehensive and easy-to-use. Many caregivers reported using the toolkit immediately after the workshops to connect to new services. Among both CSPs and caregivers, it was found that the group chat was not commonly used but had the potential to be a helpful tool to share additional resources and discuss specific topics. Conclusion This community-based, co-created intervention was implemented successfully, with high acceptability and demand. Both CSPs and caregivers found the toolkit to be useful and have used it to successfully access services, while the group chat was less used. Our study demonstrates the critical importance of working alongside community to co-create interventions to best serve specific community needs.

Simulated learning for staff at a children's hospice: a quality improvement project.

Simulated learning has well known positive effects but its use in palliative care education is limited. A quality improvement project was undertaken at a children's hospice to develop and evaluate simulation workshops. The aim was to increase the knowledge, skills and confidence of nurses and healthcare assistants in managing challenging situations commonly experienced when caring for children with life-limiting conditions and their families. The Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) model for improvement was used to test simulation workshops on a small scale using a post-workshop questionnaire and reflective diaries. Despite some initial anxiety, participants felt that the workshop had enhanced their confidence, knowledge and skills, particularly in relation to conducting challenging conversations. The project has provided insight and evidence to develop simulated learning at the children's hospice and further afield.

Work of HeArt: Addressing Educator Compassion Fatigue with Art Therapy

ABSTRACT Kindergarten through 12th grade (K-12) educators across the country are experiencing compassion fatigue from extended amounts of time with children reporting adverse childhood experiences. Additional stress from teaching through the COVID-19 pandemic has also led to burnout in United States’ educators, compounding the effects of both phenomena. An impending educator shortage may occur if the mental health of educators is not addressed. A series of mindfulness-based art therapy workshops designed to address compassion fatigue were implemented at an elementary school in a large Midwestern city. Thirty-four kindergarten and first-grade educators participated in eight monthly workshops over the course of one academic year. Workshops were designed based on a needs assessment completed by the educators. Results of the post-workshop questionnaire suggested that mindfulness-based art therapy was beneficial in addressing compassion fatigue. Five overarching themes about the program were identified from the questionnaires. Participants indicated that 1) allowing space for creativity, 2) learning creative ways to manage stress, 3) having opportunities for social connections, 4) discovering useful tools to express themselves, and 5) having dedicated time for themselves were all benefits reaped from the workshops. Participants overwhelmingly (93%) agreed that the workshops helped address compassion fatigue.

Community-led, peer-facilitated Advance Care Planning workshops prompt increased Advance Care Planning behaviors among public attendees

Despite recognized benefits, engagement in Advance Care Planning (ACP) remains low. Research into peer-facilitated, group ACP interventions is limited. This study investigated the acceptability of community-led peer-facilitated ACP workshops for the public and whether these workshops are associated with increased knowledge, motivation and engagement in ACP behaviors. Peer-facilitators from 9 community organizations were recruited and trained to deliver free ACP workshops to members of the public with an emphasis on conversation. Using a cohort design, workshop acceptability and engagement in ACP behaviors was assessed by surveying public participants at the end of the workshop and 4-6weeks later. 217 participants returned post-workshop questionnaires, and 69 returned follow-up questionnaires. Over 90% of participants felt they gained knowledge across all 6 learning goals. Every ACP behavior saw a statistically significant increase in participant completion after 4-6weeks. Almost all participants were glad they attended (94%) and would recommend the workshop to others (95%). This study revealed an association of peer-facilitated ACP workshops and completion of ACP behaviors in public participants. This innovative approach supports investment in the spread of community-based, peer-facilitated ACP workshops for the public as important ACP promotion strategies.