Postprocedural Complications Research Articles

The Current State of Coronary Revascularization: Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

The optimal revascularization strategy for coronary artery disease depends on various factors, such as disease complexity, patient characteristics, and preferences. Including a heart team in complex cases is crucial to ensure optimal outcomes. Decision-making between percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting must consider each patient's clinical profile and coronary anatomy. While current practice guidelines offer some insight into the optimal revascularization approach for the various phenotypes of coronary artery disease, the evidence to support either strategy continues to evolve and grow. Given the large amount of contemporary data on revascularization, this review aims to comprehensively summarize the literature on coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention in patients across the spectrum of coronary artery disease phenotypes. Contemporary evidence suggests that for patients with triple vessel disease, coronary artery bypass grafting is preferred over percutaneous coronary intervention due to better long-term outcomes, including lower rates of death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. Similarly, for patients with left main coronary artery disease, both percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting can be considered, as they have shown similar efficacy in terms of major adverse cardiac events, but there may be a slightly higher risk of death with percutaneous coronary intervention. For proximal left anterior descending artery disease, both percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting are viable options, but coronary artery bypass grafting has shown lower rates of repeat revascularization and better relief from angina. The Synergy Between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery score can help in decision-making by predicting the risk of adverse events and guiding the choice between percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting. European and American guidelines both agree with including a heart team that can develop and lay out individualized, optimal treatment options with respect for patient preferences. The debate between coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention in multiple different scenarios will continue to develop as technology and techniques improve for both procedures. Risk factors, pre, peri, and post-procedural complications involved in both revascularization strategies will continue to be mitigated to optimize outcomes for those patients for which coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention provide ultimate benefit. Methods to avoid unnecessary revascularization continue to develop as well as percutaneous technology that may allow patients to avoid surgical intervention when possible. With such changes, revascularization guidelines for specific patient populations may change in the coming years, which can serve as a limitation of this time-dated review.

Safety of Endoscopy in Cirrhosis.

Endoscopic procedures are among the most commonly performed medical procedures and the serious adverse event rate is reported to be 1-3 adverse events per 1000 procedures. Here, we have examined the safety of endoscopy specifically in cirrhotic populations. We conducted a retrospective case (cirrhosis)-control (non-cirrhosis) study of the outcomes of patients undergoing endoscopy in a large academic medical center. The primary outcome was a procedural or post-procedural complication. Complete clinical data were collected for all patients undergoing endoscopic procedures-including esophagogastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy, EUS, ERCP, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and others. Cirrhosis was carefully defined based on clinico-pathological grounds. We identified 16,779 patients who underwent endoscopy, including 2618 with cirrhosis and 14,161 without cirrhosis. There were 167 complications (0.99%), which included 15/2618 cirrhotics (0.6%) and 152/14,161 (1.1%) non-cirrhotics. The most common complications were cardiopulmonary (including hypotension and hypoxemia) found in 67% of patients; procedurally related complications occurred in 19% of patients. The complication rate was the same or lower in cirrhotics than controls undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy (0.6% vs 0.9%, p = 0.03), colonoscopy (0.6% vs. 0.6%, p = NS), or ERCP (0.7% vs. 1.4%, p = NS) Logistic regression analysis identified the following features to be associated with an increased risk of having a complication: inpatient status, history of myocardial infarction, and an EUS procedure. Endoscopy in cirrhotic patients was as safe or safer than non-cirrhotic patients undergoing similar procedures.

Neuromodulation in Management of Patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome. An Outcome Assessment Study

Abstract Background Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is a constellation of conditions that describes persistent or recurring low back pain following spine surgeries with a reported point prevalence in the general adult population of 37% and a lifetime prevalence of between 60% and 85%. It always has a significant impact on patients’ quality of life. Neuromodulation such as spinal cord stimulation has been showing significant effect and improvement in pain scores and functional capacity of the FBSS patients with a reflected effect on their daily activities and quality of life. Aim and Objectives Our aim in this study is to assess the change in pain scores, quality of life and opioid medications intake as an outcome of neuromodulation procedures performed to patients diagnosed with failed back surgery syndrome, and to detect the post procedure complications. Subjects and Methods This is a mixed prospective-retrospective study conducted at Ain Shams University (ASU) hospital and Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU) hospital during the period from September 2019 till December 2022. Patients who are 18 years old or older diagnosed with FBSS for more than 6 months and treated with spinal cord stimulation with successful trials during this time frame were included in the study. Results 34 patients were included in this study who had successful SCS trials and underwent a permanent implantation of SCS devices with post procedure follow up period of 12 months. Patients showed median pain numerical rating scale (NRS) of 7/10 at baseline with median NRS of 4/10 through the follow up period, also, there was a significant improvement of functional capacity using metabolic equivalent assessment with 74% of patients became moderate capacity compared to 32% at baseline. Quality of life assessed by activity measure of post-acute care (AM-PAC) showed significant improvement from mean of 16.87 ± 2.74 at baseline to mean of 19.97 ± 2.93 through follow up. Also there was a significant reduction of opioid medication usage. Post procedure complications was of low percentage with the most commonly detected were battery dysfunction in 7 patients and pocket pain in 6 patients. Reoperation was needed in 13 patients with 4 needed just revision and 9 patients required a complete removal of the device. Conclusion Failed back surgery syndrome is a widely described chronic pain condition which has a negative impact on the patients’ quality of life and daily activities with an evidenced effect on chronic use and abuse of opioid analgesic medications. We presented in our study that SCS could be offered as an effective modality of treatment with a statistically significant reduction in pain scores and a significant improvement in functional capacity and quality of life. Also, it has a recognizable but not statistically significant reduction in opioid analgesic medications and a very low percentage of procedure related complications.

The Risk of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography

Objective: This study was conducted to estimate the risk of contrast-induced AKI (CI-AKI), among Saudi patients who underwent CA or PCI at a tertiary care hospital, to understand the incidence and the underlying contributory factors of CI-AKI. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent CA or PCI from 1st January 2018 to 31st December 2020, at the King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The exclusion criteria comprised age <18 years, preexisting chronic kidney disease (stage III–V), prior renal transplantation and records with missing key clinical information. Occurrence of AKI was defined using the “Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes” (KDIGO) consensus definition. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software, version 21 was used for statistical analysis. The prevalence is presented as a percentage with a 95% confidence level. P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: We reviewed 825 patient files, of which 754 met the inclusion criteria. According to the KDIGO classification, the mean overall incidence of Stage I CI-AKI in our study cohort was 8.1%, while no patients developed stage II and III AKI. The incidence of CI-AKI was 6.4% in patients <55 years of age (n=264) and 7.8% in the age group of 55-70 years. A significantly higher incidence of 13.3% was seen in patients above the age of 70 years. The increase in the incidence of CI-AKI in patients above 70 years, versus their younger counterparts was statistically significant (P = 0.075). Conclusions: Based on the results of this study and past literature, the overall incidence of CI-AKI is around ≤10%, among patients undergoing CA or PCI; which seems lower than the high risk perception among cardiologists. While CI-AKI is a known post-procedural complication of CA or PCI, the apprehension of the potential risk of CI-AKI, should not defer or obstruct the decision to perform CA or PCI for deserving and needy candidates. Exercising caution among high-risk patients, individual risk-benefit assessment and employing well-established pre and peri-procedural prevention protocols can significantly mitigate the risk of CI-AKI; even among high-risk patients.

Dual versus conventional cardiac resynchronization: A pilot study

Background: Systolic heart failure treatment now includes cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) as a necessary element. CRT has been shown to have advantageous impacts on mortality, hospitalization rates, and quality of life. Approximately 30% of patients fail to respond to traditional CRT implantation. Aims and Objectives: This study aimed to compare the outcome of dual resynchronization by placing the right ventricular pacing lead at His bundle or left bundle branch area against conventional CRT. Materials and Methods: This longitudinal follow-up study of a total of 35 patients undergoing CRT device placement for assessment of safety, efficacy, and feasibility of the procedure and post-procedural complications and correlation with parameters obtained from electrocardiogram and echocardiography parameters in a tertiary care set up in India. Results: Among this matched population (mean age 64 years) there was a higher responder rate with the newer technique of dual resynchronization compared to conventional CRT (83% vs. 70%). Conclusion: Dual resynchronization therapy is feasible and safe and provides better electrical resynchronization compared to conventional CRT and could be a better alternative, especially when suboptimal electrical resynchronization is obtained.

Low-Power Long-Duration Versus High-Power Short-Duration Radiofrequency Ablation of the Atrioventricular Node.

Atrioventricular node (AVN) radiofrequency (RF) ablation is a highly effective treatment of atrial tachyarrhythmias that are resistant to other management modalities. To date, there is limited research that compares the properties of different RF ablation catheters. The current study aims to compare the effectiveness of several types of RF catheters in AVN ablation. 66 patients, with a mean age of 73.27 years, underwent AVN RF ablation. The catheters used were categorized as: un-irrigated (UI), externally-irrigated (EI), and contact force-sensing with 10-20 grams of force. EI catheters were divided into two different settings: low-power long-duration (LPLD) (30W, 45°C, and 60 sec) and high-power short-duration (HPSD) (50W, 43°C, and 12 sec). We compared the success rate of the different RF catheters using logistic regression and lesion times using linear regression. The distribution of the types of catheters used is: UI in 48%, LPLD in 16%, and HPSD in 36% of patients. All ablation procedures were successful, with no immediate post-procedure complications. HPSD had a significantly shorter lesion time than UI catheters by 403.42 sec [-631.67, -175.17]. UI catheters, LPLD, and HPSD were equally safe and effective in ablation procedures. The HPSD catheter had a significantly shorter lesion time and, thus, overall decreased procedure time.

Acute Pancreatitis after EGD: Case Presentation and Literature Review of this Rare Post-Procedure Complication.

Acute pancreatitis is a common cause of hospitalisation characterised by inflammation of the pancreas. While mechanical, toxic and iatrogenic factors typically cause it, post-oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) pancreatitis is extremely rare. This report examines a case of acute pancreatitis following EGD, aiming to highlight this rare but significant complication. A 46-year-old woman with a history of breast cancer, anxiety, vitamin D deficiency and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease underwent an EGD, which revealed and led to the removal of duodenal polyps. Six hours post-procedure, she presented with severe abdominal pain radiating to her back, accompanied by nausea. Laboratory results indicated elevated lipase levels, and a computed tomography (CT) scan confirmed acute pancreatitis. The patient was managed with aggressive fluid resuscitation, bowel rest and pain management, leading to an improvement in her condition and subsequent discharge. We believe that the pancreatitis was likely caused by the use of cautery during the endoscopic mucosal resection of duodenal polyps. This case underscores the need for clinicians to recognise acute pancreatitis as a potential complication of EGD, especially in the absence of other common risk factors. Acute pancreatitis following oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is an uncommon but significant complication.Possible mechanisms include mechanical trauma, gas insufflation or electrical injury during endoscopic mucosal resection.Clinicians should be aware of this potential complication, especially when no typical aetiological factors for pancreatitis are present.

Ten-Year Experience with a Transapical Approach for Transcatheter Aortic and Mitral Valve Implantation.

The transfemoral approach represents the optimal access for TAVI due to its low invasiveness; however, up to 10-15% of TAVI candidates are considered unsuitable for femoral access because of significant peripheral vascular disease and need alternative access. This is a single-center retrospective observational study including all consecutive adult patients undergoing transcatheter procedures through a TA approach from March 2015 to April 2024. 213 patients underwent transcatheter aortic or mitral valve implantation through a TA approach and were enrolled in this study. The mean age of the patients was 79.5 ± 5.7 years, and 54% of the patients were males. The mean Euroscore II was 7.9 ± 6.4%. One-third of the patients had previous cardiac surgery. The overall mean survival time was 5.3 ± 0.3 years. Nine (4%) patients developed infective endocarditis (IE) during the follow-up. The transapical approach for transcatheter procedures is a safe and effective procedure for patients unsuitable for TF access with low periprocedural mortality and a low rate of post-procedural complications when performed by experienced surgeons and cardiologists.

Transcatheter Cardiac Interventions in Neonates with Congenital Heart Disease: A Single Centre Experience

Objective: To analyze the outcome among neonates undergoing transcatheter balloon atrial septostomy for various kinds of congenital heart diseases. Study Design: Prospective longitudinal study. Place and Duration of Study: National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Karachi Pakistan, from Feb 2020 to May 2021. Methodology: A total of 28 neonates of both genders with echocardiography proven diagnosis of Tricuspid Atresia with restrictive Patent Foramen Ovale, Dextro-Transposition of Great Arteries with Intact Ventricular Septum, complex cyanotic congenital heart disease with inadequate mixing or hypoplastic left heart syndrome with restrictive PFO and a non-significant Patent Ductus Arteriosus, undergoing transcatheter balloon atrial septostomy were included. Demographic data along with diagnosis, clinical presentation, echocardiographic findings, procedural outcome (successful/unsuccessful), duration of the procedure, complication (if any), post-procedural echocardiographic findings, duration of hospital stay, further treatment plan and 3-months follow up outcomes were recorded among all neonates. Results: Most common diagnosis was Dextro-Transposition of the Great Arteries with IVS observed in 14(50.0%) neonates. Procedural outcome was found to be successful among 23(82.1%) neonates. There were 19(67.9%) neonates who did not show any post-procedure complication. At 3-months follow up, improvement in blood saturation and weight gain were reported among 12(42.9%) neonates each. Overall, mortality was noted in 7(25.0%) neonates, of whom 4(57.1%) neonates were having hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Conclusion: Transcatheter atrial septostomy done in neonatal period was found to have positive outcomes. Mortality remains high among neonates undergoing transcatheter atrial septostomy having hypoplastic left heart syndrome.

When Rhythm Correction Turns Risky: Rare Right-Sided Haemorrhagic Pleural Effusion Post Maze Procedure.

Healthcare providers should remain vigilant for rare complications, for example right-sided haemothorax, following cardiac surgeries such as the maze procedure to initiate timely management and ensure favourable outcomes.The post-maze procedure, atrial flutter or macroreentrant atrial tachycardia may resist standard medical treatment, emphasising the importance of considering catheter ablation as a therapeutic option to improve patient outcomes.Empowering patients with knowledge about potential post-procedure complications and associated symptoms facilitates early reporting, enabling prompt intervention by healthcare providers and leading to improved treatment outcomes.

Improving the hemocompatibility of a porohyperelastic layered vascular graft using luminal reversal microflows

Vascular graft thrombosis is a long-standing clinical problem. A myriad of efforts have been devoted to reducing thrombus formation following bypass surgery. Researchers have primarily taken a chemical approach to engineer and modify surfaces, seeking to make them more suitable for blood contacting applications. Using mechanical forces and surface topology to prevent thrombus formation has recently gained more attention. In this study, we have designed a bilayered porous vascular graft capable of repelling platelets and destabilizing absorbed protein layers from the luminal surface. During systole, fluid penetrates through the graft wall and is subsequently ejected from the wall into the luminal space (Luminal Reversal Flow - LRF), pushing platelets away from the surface during diastole. In-vitro hemocompatibility tests were conducted to compare platelet deposition in high LRF grafts with low LRF grafts. Graft material properties were determined and utilized in a porohyperelastic (PHE) finite element model to computationally predict the LRF generation in each graft type. Hemocompatibility testing showed significantly lower platelet deposition values in high versus low LRF generating grafts (median±IQR = 5,708 ± 987 and 23,039 ± 3,310 platelets per mm2, respectively, p=0.032). SEM imaging of the luminal surface of both graft types confirmed the quantitative blood test results. The computational simulations of high and low LRF generating grafts resulted in LRF values of -10.06 μm/s and -2.87 μm/s, respectively. These analyses show that a 250% increase in LRF is associated with a 75.2% decrease in platelet deposition. PHE vascular grafts with high LRF have the potential to improve anti-thrombogenicity and reduce thrombus-related post-procedure complications. Additional research is required to overcome the limitations of current graft fabrication technologies that further enhance LRF generation.

First multicenter study evaluating the utility of the BENCHMARKTM BMXTM 81 large-bore access catheter in neurovascular interventions.

This study is the first multicentric report on the safety, efficacy, and technical performance of utilizing a large bore (0.081″ inner diameter) access catheter in neurovascular interventions. Data were retrospectively collected from seven sites in the United States for neurovascular procedures via large bore 0.081″ inner diameter access catheter (Benchmark BMX81, Penumbra, Inc.). The primary outcome was technical success, defined as the access catheter reaching its target vessel. Safety outcomes included periprocedural device-related and access site complications. There were 90 consecutive patients included. The median age of the patients was 63 years (IQR: 53, 68); 53% were female. The most common interventions were aneurysm embolization (33.3%), carotid stenting (12.2%), and arteriovenous malformation embolization (11.1%). The transradial approach was most used (56.7%), followed by transfemoral (41.1%). Challenging anatomic variations included severe vessel tortuosity (8/90, 8.9%), type 2 aortic arch (7/90, 7.8%), type 3 aortic arch (2/90, 2.2%), bovine arch (2/90, 2.2%), and severe angle (<30°) between the subclavian artery and target vessel (1/90, 1.1%). Technical success was achieved in 98.9% of the cases (89/90), with six cases requiring a switch from radial to femoral (6.7%) and one case from femoral to radial (1.1%). There were no access site complications or complications related to the 0.081″ catheter. Two postprocedural complications occurred (2.2%), unrelated to the access catheter. The BMX™ 81 large-bore access catheters was safe and effective in both radial and femoral access across a wide range of neurovascular procedures, achieving high technical success without any access site or device-related complications.

Lowering Platelet Threshold to 20,000/μL for Fluoroscopy-Guided Lumbar Puncture Does Not Result in Observed Clinical Adverse Outcomes.

Fluoroscopic-guided lumbar puncture (FG-LP) is a common neuroradiologic procedure. Traditionally, a minimum platelet count (MPC) of 50,000/μL for this procedure has been required; however, we recently adopted a lower MPC threshold of 20,000/μL. The purpose of this study was to compare adverse events in patients undergoing FG-LP with MPCs above to those below the conventional 50,000/μL threshold. This was an institutional review board-approved, retrospective study on adult patients with hematologic malignancy undergoing FG-LP in the neuroradiology division between May 2021 and December 2022, after lowering the minimal required MPC to 20,000/μL. Recorded data included indication for FG-LP, preprocedure and postprocedure MPC, need for and number of platelet transfusions within 24 hours of FG-LP, presence of traumatic tap, FG-LP-related complications, and any platelet transfusion-related adverse event. Patients were classified into 2 groups based on MPC: (1) those above 50,000/μL and (2) those below 50,000/μL. Descriptive statistics were used comparing these 2 groups. One hundred twenty-eight patients underwent FG-LP, with 46 having an MPC between 20,000 and 50,000/μL and 82 having an MPC above 50,000/μL. No postprocedural complications were encountered in either group. Traumatic taps occurred in 10/46 (22%)​ with MPC below 50,000/μL versus 10/82 (12%)​ in those with MPC above 50,000/μL. Forty of 46 patients (87%) were transfused with platelets within 24 hours prior to FG-LP. One patient developed a transfusion-related reaction. Lowering the MPC threshold from 50,000/μL to 20,000/μL for FG-LP did not result in a higher incidence of spinal hematoma.

Predictors of En Bloc, R0 Resection, and Postprocedural Complications After Advanced Endoscopic Resections for Colorectal Neoplasms: Results of 1213 Procedures.

Advanced endoscopic resection techniques are used to treat colorectal neoplasms that are not amenable to conventional colonoscopic resection. Literature regarding the predictors of the outcomes of advanced endoscopic resections, especially from a colorectal surgical unit, is limited. To determine the predictors of short-term and long-term outcomes after advanced endoscopic resections. Retrospective case series. Tertiary care center. Patients who underwent advanced endoscopic resections for colorectal neoplasms from November 2011 to August 2022. Endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection, hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection, and combined endoscopic laparoscopic surgery. Predictors of en bloc and R0 resection, bleeding, and perforation were determined using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. Cox regression models were used to determine the predictors of tumor recurrence. A total of 1213 colorectal lesions from 1047 patients were resected (median age 66 [interquartile range, 58-72] years, 484 women [46.2%], median BMI 28.6 [interquartile range, 24.8-32.6]). Most neoplasms were in the proximal colon (898; 74%). The median lesion size was 30 (interquartile range, 20-40; range, 0-120) mm. Nine hundred eleven lesions (75.1%) underwent previous interventions. The most common Paris and Kudo classifications were 0 to IIa flat elevation (444; 36.6%) and IIIs (301; 24.8%), respectively. En bloc and R0 resection rates were 56.6% and 54.3%, respectively. Smaller lesions, rectal location, and procedure type (endoscopic submucosal dissection) were associated with significantly higher en bloc and R0 resection rates. Bleeding and perforation rates were 5% and 6.6%, respectively. Increased age was a predictor for bleeding (OR 1.06; 95% CI, 1.03-1.09; p < 0.0001). Lesion size was a predictor for perforation (OR 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.03; p = 0.03). The tumor recurrence rate was 6.6%. En bloc (HR 1.41; 95% CI, 1.05-1.93; p = 0.02) and R0 resection (HR 1.49; 95% CI, 1.11-2.06; p = 0.008) were associated with decreased recurrence risk. Single-center, retrospective study. Outcomes of advanced endoscopic resections can be predicted by patient-related and lesion-related characteristics. See Video Abstract . ANTECEDENTES:Las técnicas avanzadas de resección endoscópica se utilizan para el tratamiento de neoplasias colorrectales que no son susceptibles de resección colonoscópica convencional. La literatura sobre los predictores de los resultados de las resecciones endoscópicas avanzadas, especialmente en una unidad de cirugía colorrectal, es limitada.OBJETIVO:Determinar los predictores de resultados a corto y largo plazo después de resecciones endoscópicas avanzadas.DISEÑO:Serie de casos retrospectivos.LUGAR:Centro de tercer nivel de atención.PACIENTES:Pacientes sometidos a resecciones endoscópicas avanzadas por neoplasias colorrectales desde noviembre de 2011 hasta agosto de 2022.INTERVENCIÓNES:Resección endoscópica de la mucosa, disección endoscópica submucosa (ESD), ESD híbrida, cirugía laparoscópica endoscópica combinada.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Los predictores de resección en bloque y R0, sangrado y perforación se determinaron mediante modelos de regresión logística univariables y multivariables. Se utilizaron modelos de regresión de Cox para determinar los predictores de recurrencia del tumor.RESULTADOS:Se resecaron 1.213 lesiones colorrectales en 1.047 pacientes [edad media 66 (58-72) años, 484 (46,2%) mujeres, índice de masa corporal medio 28,6 (24,8-32,6) kg/m 2 ]. La mayoría de las neoplasias se encontraban en el colon proximal (898, 74%). El tamaño medio de la lesión fue de 30mm (RIC: 20-40, rango: 0-120). 911 (75,1%) lesiones tenían intervenciones previas. Las clasificaciones de París y Kudo más comunes fueron 0-IIa elevación plana (444, 36,6%) y III (301, 24,8%), respectivamente. Las tasas de resección en bloque y R0 fueron del 56,6% y 54,3%, respectivamente. Las lesiones más pequeñas, la ubicación rectal y el tipo de procedimiento (ESD) se asociaron con tasas de resección en bloque y R0 significativamente más altas. Las tasas de sangrado y perforación fueron del 5% y 6,6%, respectivamente. La edad avanzada [1,06 (1,03-1,09), p < 0,0001] fue un predictor de sangrado. El tamaño de la lesión [1,02 (1,00-1,03), p = 0,03] fue un predictor de perforación. La tasa de recurrencia del tumor fue del 6,6%. En bloque [HR 1,41 (IC 95% 1,05-1,93), p = 0,02] y la resección R0 [HR 1,49 (IC 95% 1,11-2,06), p = 0,008] se asociaron con un menor riesgo de recurrencia.LIMITACIONES:Estudio unicéntrico, retrospectivo.CONCLUSIONES:Los resultados de las resecciones endoscópicas avanzadas pueden predecirse según las características del paciente y de la lesión. (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo ).

Prophylactic Antibiotic Use in Reconstruction of Nasal Mohs Defects.

To evaluate the effect of prophylactic antibiotics on outcomes and complications following surgical reconstructions of nasal Mohs defects in the outpatient setting. Retrospective cohort study. Single tertiary care center, July 2021 to June 2023. All adult patients who underwent reconstruction of nasal Mohs defects in an outpatient office setting were examined. Patient demographics, surgical details, prophylactic postprocedural antibiotic use, and postprocedural complications (infection, flap or graft necrosis, wound dehiscence) were collected. Outcomes and complications were compared between patients who received and did not receive prophylactic antibiotics using χ2, Kruskal-Wallis, and multivariable logistic regression. A total of 211 patients met inclusion criteria. A majority of reconstructions utilized a local flap (70%), followed by a skin or composite graft (22%), then an interpolated flap (8%). Over half of patients (55%) were prescribed prophylactic antibiotics. Postprocedural complications were documented in 16 patients (7.6%), including infection (3.3%) and flap or graft loss or necrosis (1.4%). The rate of complications did not differ based on receipt of antibiotics. The only factors independently associated with the development of complications were history of chemoradiation and reconstruction with skin or composite grafts. Prophylactic antibiotics after nasal Mohs reconstructions performed in the office setting were not associated with any differences in the rate of postprocedural complications, including surgical site infections.

Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR) in Patients With Sarcoidosis.

Introduction Data regarding clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with sarcoidosis is lacking. This study aims to clarify the clinical outcomes of TAVR vs SAVR in patients with sarcoidosis. Methods Data was collected from the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016-2019 using validated ICD-10-CM codes for sarcoidosis, TAVR, and SAVR. Patients were divided into two cohorts: those who underwent TAVR and those who underwent SAVR. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson's chi-squared test to determine clinical outcomes of TAVR vs SAVR in patients with sarcoidosis. Results The prevalence of sarcoidosis was 0.23%among total study patients (n=142,420,378). After exclusions, the prevalence of TAVR was 650 (49%) and SAVR was 675 (51%) in patients with sarcoidosis. Patients who underwent TAVR were on average older (74 vs 65 years old, p=0.001), and more likely to be female (57 vs 40%, p<0.001) compared to patients who underwent SAVR. The TAVR cohort had higher rates of congestive heart failure (CHF) (77.7 vs 42.2%, p=0.001), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (42.3 vs 24.4% p=0.001), anemia (5.4 vs 2.2%, p=0.004), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (1.5 vs 0%, p=0.004), and hypothyroidism (31.5 vs 16.3%, p=0.001) compared to the SAVR cohort. Inpatient mortality post-procedure was higher in the SAVR cohort compared to the TAVR cohort (15 vs 0, p=0.001). Regarding post-procedure complications, respiratory complications were more common in the SAVR cohort (4.4 vs 0%, p=0.001), while TAVR was associated with a higher incidence of permanent pacemaker (PPM) insertion (2.15 vs 0.8%, p=0.001). There was no statistical difference in the development of acute kidney injury (AKI) (0.8 vs 1.5%, p=0.33), AKI requiring hemodialysis (0 vs. 0.7%, p=0.08), or stroke (0.8 vs 0.7, p=1) post-procedure between the two cohorts. Conclusion This study found that in the sarcoidosis population, TAVR was associated with reduced mortality, shorter hospital length of stay, and lower hospitalization costs in comparison to SAVR.

Efficacy and Safety of Laser Balloon Versus Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation as Initial Therapies for Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis.

Catheter ablation (CA) is an effective therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF) and, although radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the standard treatment for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), it is complex and time-consuming. Laser balloon ablation (LBA) has been introduced to simplify the conventional RFA; however, results of studies comparing LBA and RFA remain controversial. As such, this investigation aimed to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of LBA versus RFA. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for relevant studies. The primary endpoints were the freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) and procedure-related complications. Twelve studies including 1274 subjects were included. LBA and RFA yielded similar rates of freedom from ATA (72.5% vs. 68.7%, odds ratio [OR] = 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-1.7, p = 0.11) and procedure-related complications (7.7% vs. 6.5%, OR = 1.17, 95% CI 0.72-1.90, p = 0.536). LBA with the second- and third-generation laser balloons (LB2/3) yielded remarkably higher rates of freedom from ATA than RFA using contact-force technology (RFA-CF) (OR = 1.91, p = 0.013). Significantly lower pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection rates (OR = 0.51, p = 0.021), but higher phrenic nerve palsy (PNP) rates (OR = 3.42, p = 0.023) were observed in the LBA group. LBA had comparable procedure (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 8.43 min, p = 0.337) and fluoroscopy times (WMD = 3.09 min, p = 0.174), but a longer ablation time (WMD = 12.57 min, p = 0.00) than those for RFA. LBA and RFA treatments were comparable in terms of freedom from ATA and postprocedural complications in patients with AF. Compared with RFA, LBA was associated with significantly lower PV reconnection rates, but a higher incidence of PNP and longer ablation time.

Sex Disparities in the Use and Outcomes of Septal Reduction Therapies for Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

BackgroundData are limited that examine potential sex-based disparities in the utilization and complications of septal reduction therapy (SRT) in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Our aim was to assess the use and in-hospital outcomes of SRT, according to sex. We performed a retrospective cohort study using the 2017-2019 National Inpatient Sample database. Adult patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy were identified. MethodsWe assessed the use of SRT (surgical septal myectomy and alcohol septal ablation), according to sex. In those who underwent SRT, rates of in-hospital mortality, pacemaker implantation, implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation, ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and pericardial complication were assessed. All outcomes were compared between groups using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), adjusting for demographics, comorbidity burden, and hospital characteristics. ResultsIn total, 72,680 weighted hospitalizations (median age: 67 years [range: 57-77]; 61% female patients) were included, and only 5.9% of patients underwent SRT. After IPTW adjustment, female patients were more likely to undergo SRT (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 1.18, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.03-1.36) and alcohol septal ablation (aRR 1.38, 95% CI 1.04-1.83). Likewise, female patients received pacemaker implantation more often (aRR 1.96, 95% CI 1.10-3.50) and ICD implantation (aRR 0.58, 95% CI 0.34-0.99) less frequently, compared with male patients. No differences were present in rates of surgical septal myectomy, in-hospital mortality, ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and pericardial complication between groups. ConclusionsOur results suggest that female patients were slightly more likely to undergo SRT, especially alcohol septal ablation. In-hospital mortality and postprocedural complications were similar between the sexes, but women received more pacemaker implantation and less ICD implantation.

Comparison of high-flow nasal cannula and conventional nasal cannula during deep sedation for endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized controlled trial.

Adequate oxygenation and airway management during deep sedation can be challenging. We investigated the effect of high-flow nasal cannula (group HF) and conventional nasal cannula (group CO) during sedation for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Patients undergoing ESD with deep sedation were enrolled. The primary outcome was difference in lowest oxygen saturation (SpO2) between the groups. Incidence of hypoxia (SpO2 < 90%), patients with SpO2 < 95%, hypercapnia, and airway interventions; operator satisfaction; and adverse events were recorded. Thirty-two patients in each group completed the study. The mean of minimum SpO2 values was significantly higher in group HF than in group CO (96.8% ± 4.2% vs. 93.3% ± 5.3%, p = 0.005). The incidence of hypoxia was comparable between the groups (4 [12.5%] vs. 6 [18.8%], p = 0.491); however, patients with SpO2 < 95% were significantly less in group HF (5 [15.6%] vs. 18 [56.3%], p = 0.003). Incidence of hypercapnia was higher in group HF than in group CO (14 [46.7%] vs. 5 [16.7%], p = 0.013). Airway rescue interventions were significantly less common in group HF. Satisfaction of operators and post-procedural complications were comparable between the two groups. In multivariable analysis, group CO and higher body mass index were risk factors for airway managements (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 6.204 [1.784-21.575], p = 0.004; 1.337 [1.043-1.715], p = 0.022, respectively). Compared to conventional nasal cannula, high-flow nasal cannula maintained higher minimum SpO2 value during deep sedation with propofol-remifentanil for ESD. Clinical Trial Registry of the Republic of Korea (KCT0006618, https://cris.nih.go.kr ; registered September 29, 2021; principal investigator: Ji Won Choi).

A Transperineal Biopsy of the Prostate Does Not Require Routine Antibiotic Cover.

Introduction A transperineal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TPB) under local anaesthetics (LA) after a prostate MRI scan is the gold standard for performing a prostate biopsy in patients with suspected prostate cancer. It has superseded transrectal ultrasound-guidedprostate biopsy (TRUSB). Historically, TRUSB by definition was performed in a contaminated environment and was routinely covered with antibiotics to reduce the risks of infection. Despite this, the rate of post-biopsy urosepsis has been documented to be as high as 5% in some series. In the transition from TRUSB to the establishment of a TPB under LA service in our unit, we continued to use a single dose of oral antibiotics for all patients attending for biopsy. The aim of this study is to establish whether the use of single-dose antibiotics has any effect on morbidity rates post-TPB. Methods A retrospective analysis of complications was carried out on 326 consecutive patients, who underwent TPB over a six-month period. One cohort of patients were biopsied with no antibiotic cover (n=149, 45.7%) as compared to another cohort who were given a single dose of oral antibiotics (n=177, 54.3%). Those patients in the group receiving antibiotics received either a single dose of co-amoxiclav or a single dose of ciprofloxacin. Patients with indwelling urethral catheters or with a urinary tract infection (UTI) were excluded from the analyses. All patients were followed- up after a multidisciplinary team meeting discussion (MDT) with either a telephone or a face-to-face consultation. Results A total of 324 (99.4%) patients did not report post-procedural complications. Two patients from the antibiotic group presented with infectious complications (1.1%); one patient was admitted with a prostate abscess and required drainage under general anaesthesia, and another was admitted with urosepsis requiring intravenous antibiotics. In the group who did not receive antibiotics, there were no complications reported, which was not significantly different compared to the antibiotic group (p=0.50). Conclusion Our results demonstrate that the routine use of single-dose antibiotics with TPB does not affect morbidity rates. On the basis of this investigation, we have now stopped using routine antibiotic cover for patients undergoing an LA TPB.