Postoperative Visual Analog Scale Research Articles

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Cervical One-Hole Split Endoscopic Keyhole Surgery for Cervical Radiculopathy.

One-hole Split Endoscopy (OSE) is a newer surgical modality that can be applied to posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF), lumbar discectomy, laminectomy, and decompression. It incorporates intervertebral foraminotomy, open surgery, and other lumboendoscopic techniques with a wide observation field, free space, and compatibility with various spinal surgical techniques and instruments. This study investigated the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive posterior cervical nucleus pulposus removal for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) by OSE-Keyhole technique. This was a retrospective study of 63 patients treated with OSE keyhole treatment for CSR between May 2021 and September 2023 at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (Qingdao, China), and Second Hospital of Shandong University, respectively. Clinical outcomes included patients' preoperative and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) - arm and neck, Japanese Orthopaedic Association Assessment Treatment Score (JOA) - cervical spine, which were collected at baseline, two days postoperatively, one month postoperatively, and three months postoperatively after the last follow-up visit for evaluation, and perioperative indicators, including intraoperative bleeding, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and reoperations, which were also collected. Statistical analyses were performed for the baseline data and follow-up results of 63 patients. Compared to the preoperative baseline values, the follow-up results two days, one month and three months after surgery showed significant improvements in vas-arm, neck and JOA scores in the operated patients (P<0.05) as well as a reduction in all perioperative-related indices. In the treatment of cervical pain and disability due to radiculopathy, OSE keyhole removal of the posterior cervical nucleus pulposus is a better clinical option as it is less invasive and recovers better postoperatively.

Comparison of Full Endoscopic Lumbar Diskectomy Using the Transforaminal Approach versus Interlaminar Approach for L5-S1 Lumbar Disk Herniation Treatment: A Meta-Analysis.

Numerous studies have examined the clinical effectiveness of transforaminal full endoscopic lumbar diskectomy (T-FELD) and interlaminar full endoscopic lumbar diskectomy (I-FELD) for L5-S1 lumbar disk herniation (LDH), with mixed findings. The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the perioperative outcomes, clinical results, and complications of T-FELD and I-FELD to determine their efficacy and safety for treating L5-S1 LDH and to examine the features of complications in depth. Several databases were searched for articles that matched all of the inclusion criteria. The visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used to assess the clinical results. Information on perioperative outcomes and complications was gathered and analyzed. Eight studies with 756 participants were included. There were no significant differences in postoperative bed time (p = 0.44) and hospitalization time (p = 0.49) between T-FELD and I-FELD. When compared with I-FELD, T-FELD was associated with substantially longer fluoroscopy time (p < 0.0001) and operating time (p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in the preoperative and postoperative VAS and ODI scores between T-FELD and I-FELD. The rates for overall complications, postoperative dysesthesia, postoperative lower extremity pain, incomplete decompression, recurrence, and conversion to open surgery were comparable for T-FLED and I-FELD. T-FELD and I-FELD had equal clinical results and safety for treatment of L5-S1 LDH. Fluoroscopy and operative times were shorter for I-FELD than for T-FELD.

Hip Labral Repair versus Reconstruction: Meta-analysis.

The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare the postoperative outcomes and complications of labral repair with those of labral reconstruction. An electronic search strategy was conducted from 1986 until August 2023 using the following databases: PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20). The primary objectives included the postoperative clinical outcomes determined by the number of patients who reached minimal clinical important difference (MCID) on the visual analog scale (VAS), modified Harris hip score (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score-Sports Subscale (HOS-SS), Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Life (HOS-ADL), and International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12). In addition, analysis of the rate of revision arthroscopy, the rate of conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA), the postoperative VAS, mHHS, HOS-SS, HOS-ADL, iHOT-12, nonarthritic hip score (NAHS), patient satisfaction, lower extremity function scale (LEFS), and the SF-12 (12-item shortform) was also performed. Any differences arising between the investigators were resolved by discussion. Seventeen studies were relevant to the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. A higher rate of patients who reached MCID in the mHHS (P=0.02) as well as a higher rate of revision arthroscopy was observed for labral repair (P=0.03). The remaining studied outcomes were comparable. Despite the greater predictability of success in the reconstruction group, conduct of additional studies will be required for evaluation of the benefits of such findings. In addition, labral reconstruction is more technically demanding than a labral repair.

Analysis of Patients Who Undergo Index Arthroscopy With Biopsy but Not Implantation for Staged Chondrocyte Cell Transplantation.

Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) and matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) are 2-stage procedures requiring an index full-thickness cartilage biopsy. Only a portion of patients ultimately undergo second-stage ACI/MACI. To identify patients with articular cartilage defects who underwent arthroscopic debridement with biopsy for ACI/MACI and compare those who did with those who did not proceed with implantation within 2 years after biopsy. Additionally, the authors sought to identify why patients did not proceed with implantation. Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Patients who underwent arthroscopy and autologous chondrocyte biopsy from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019, and who had minimum 2-year follow-up data were grouped into those who proceeded with second-stage ACI/MACI (implant group; n = 97) and those who did not (biopsy group; n = 63). Demographic factors, cartilage defect characteristics, and preoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were analyzed. Patients in both groups were evaluated postoperatively using the IKDC, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and patients who did not undergo implantation were asked for their reasoning. Body mass index (BMI) (P < .001) and Outerbridge grades at index arthroscopy (P = .047) were significantly higher for the implant group than the biopsy group. Both groups had significantly improved IKDC scores from their initial presentation to final follow-up (implant group: 46.4 ± 16.2 preoperative vs 69.6 ± 20.6 postoperative [P < .001]; biopsy group: 47.2 ± 15.9 preoperative vs 70.7 ± 19.1 postoperative [P < .001]); however, the level of improvement did not differ significantly between groups. Postoperative WOMAC, SANE, and VAS pain scores were also similar between groups. In the biopsy group, 23 patients (37%) cited symptom resolution or activity level improvement after initial arthroscopy as the reason for not proceeding with implantation. Patients who proceeded to the second stage of chondrocyte implantation via either ACI or MACI had higher-grade articular defects and higher BMI compared with those who underwent biopsy with concomitant debridement chondroplasty alone. Postoperative outcomes were similar between the groups.

Clinical and radiological outcomes of a highly lateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with a height of 160 cm or less versus a height of 170 cm or more

BackgroundTo evaluates the impact of patient height (less than 160 cm and greater than 170 cm) on outcomes of lateralized reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). MethodThis retrospective case–control study of 31 lateralized rTSA patients, with follow-ups ranging from 12 to 28 months, was divided into 2 groups: 14 short-stature (≤160 cm) and 17 taller (≥170 cm) patients. Preoperative planning utilized e-ORTHO templating software (FH Orthopaedics, Mulhouse, France), ensuring uniform lateralization shoulder angle and distalization shoulder angles across groups. Primary outcomes included range of motion (ROM), while secondary outcomes comprised Constant Score (absolute/ponderate), subjective shoulder value (SSV), and visual analog scale (VAS). Discrepancies in scores between groups were evaluated for clinical relevance against minimal clinically important difference benchmarks. Incidences of scapular notching were also recorded. ResultsAll the clinical parameters analyzed were improved postoperatively in both groups (P < .05). No significant difference was observed in postoperative ROM, ponderate Constant, and VAS between groups (P > .05) except for forward elevation which was higher in the taller group (142.9 ± 27.6 compared to 163.5 ± 11.1 P = .018). For SSV, the taller group had higher postoperative SSV (P = .037). However, the difference was less than the minimal clinically important difference for SSV (−5.97 [95% confidence interval: −10.17 to 1.76], P = .01) and thus was considered not clinically significant. No scapular notching was detected in either group. ConclusionWhen planned positioning angles are respected (lateralization shoulder angle, distalization shoulder angle), the benefits of highly lateralized rTSA are consistent regardless of patient stature. Both groups had comparable results across ROM, ponderate Constant, and VAS except for forward elevation which was higher in the taller group.

An analysis of clinical application effects of 3d-printed act titanium trabecular intervertebral fusion cage in posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF).

To compare the clinical effects of applying a 3D-printed ACT titanium trabecular intervertebral fusion cage and a Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage in posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). This was a clinical comparative study. Forty patients with degenerative lumbar diseases admitted at The Second People's Hospital of Dalian from January 2020 to December 2021 were selected and divided into an observation group (3D cage) and a control group (PEEK cage) using the random number table method, with each group of 20 cases. The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, Cobb angles at fusion segments, intervertebral height and intervertebral fusion situations of the patients between the groups were compared. No significant differences were found in their operation time, intraoperative blood losses and operation related complications(p>0.05). In terms of postoperative VAS and JOA scores in both groups, they are all significantly improved compared with those before the operation, and their differences are also statistically significant(p<0.05). However, no statistical significance exists in inter-group differences(p>0.05). Postoperative Cobb angles and intervertebral height of patients in both groups are considerably bettered compared with those before the operation. Their differences show statistical significance(p<0.05), while inter-group differences are proved to be not statistically significant(p>0.05). Applying a 3D-printed ACT titanium trabecular intervertebral fusion cage or PEEK cage in PLIF has the potential to improve clinical symptoms of patients with degenerative lumbar diseases, and restore the Cobb angle and intervertebral height. 3D-printed ACT titanium trabecular intervertebral fusion cage can accelerate intervertebral fusion without increasing operation related complications.

Effect of Distraction Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Ankle Arthritis.

Currently, the traditional treatment of moderate-to-severe ankle arthritis is joint fusion or joint replacement. The aim of this article is to explore the clinical efficacy of distraction arthroplasty in the treatment of moderate-to-severe ankle arthritis. A retrospective analysis was conducted with a total of 34 cases who were diagnosed with moderate-to-severe ankle arthritis and treated by distraction arthroplasty from January 2007 to November 2021. The average age was 42.3 years. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score and pain visual analog scale (VAS) were used to evaluate ankle pain and functional improvement before surgery and at the last follow-up. Based on age, the patients were divided into the ≤45-year-old group [young group, 15 cases, age (36.37 ± 4.31) years old] and the >45-year-old group [middle-aged and elderly group, 19 cases, age (53.74 ± 3.17) years old]. The analysis included comparing preoperative and postoperative AOFAS ankle-hindfoot and VAS scores and the influence of age on distraction arthroplasty. All 34 patients were followed up, and the follow-up time ranged from 13 to 143 months, with an average of 45.3 months. The follow-up times for the young and middle-to-elderly groups were (33.19 ± 21.37) months and (55.63 ± 29.69) months, respectively. At the last follow-up, the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot and VAS scores were significantly improved compared with the preoperative assessment (p < 0.05). According to the etiological analysis, except for Pilon fracture, which showed no differences pre- and postoperation in the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score and VAS score (p > 0.05), all other patients showed significant differences in these two scores (p < 0.05). The difference in preoperative AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scores between the young and middle-to-elderly groups was statistically significant (t = 3.422, p = 0.021). The preoperative and postoperative comparison of preoperative VAS scores, AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scores, and VAS scores before and after surgery showed no differences (p > 0.05). The joint space width (JSW) of 10 patients who were followed up for more than 5 years was (2.9 ± 0.5) mm. Two patients who were followed up for more than 10 years showed 3.3 and 3.0 mm, respectively, JSW. Distraction arthroplasty with the Ilizarov external fixator can achieve satisfactory results in the treatment of moderate-to-severe ankle arthritis (except arthritis caused by Pilon fracture surgery). Age has no statistical impact on the efficacy of distraction arthroplasty.

An Audit of Outcomes in Cosmetic Rhinoplasty with the Mandatory Psychiatric Evaluation Protocol.

With the high demand of rhinoplasty surgery, careful selection and management of aspirants, as well as proper assessment of outcomes after surgery, are imperative for achieving successful outcomes and learning from it. The aim of this study was to answer two important questions: (1) What is the success rate in cosmetic rhinoplasty? (2) How can we best identify candidates who would achieve good outcomes in cosmetic rhinoplasty? In this study cohort, we excluded patients with any functional concerns and confounding factors that could in any way influence patient satisfaction with a cosmetic surgery. This study is a part of the trilogy of articles on "psychology of rhinoplasty" submitted to this volume of Facial Plastic Surgery, using mandatory psychiatric evaluation (MPE) to optimize candidacy. In total, 184 patients (144 females and 40 males) aged 16 to 63 years (M = 31.09) met the inclusion criteria and were included in this study (follow-up: 3-122 months; M = 70.18 months), and outcome satisfaction was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) score and a 5-point Likert scale. The mean improvement between preoperative (M = 4.26) and postoperative VAS scores (M = 8.47) was 4.23. Most patients were happy or very happy (95.1%) about the surgical outcome. Patients who were very happy generally scored between 8 and 10 on the VAS (77.2%) and those who were happy generally scored between 6 and 7.9 (21.2%). Some patients, however, were neutral (3.3%) or unhappy (1.6%) about their surgical outcome, and generally scored around ≤7 on the VAS. Although the successful outcome in 95.1% patients reflects a carefully designed protocol for rhinoplasty candidacy, 4.9% patients reported poor satisfaction despite these efforts. An ever-present proportion of unhappy outcomes is a reality of this popular surgery.

The median effective concentration of ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided anterior iliopsoas muscle space block in the elderly undergoing hip surgery: a dose-finding study.

In order to improve perioperative pain and reduce the adverse outcome of severe pain in elderly hip fractures, anterior iliopsoas muscle space block (AIMSB) can be used clinically to reduce pain. The aim of the study is to investigate the 50% effective concentration (EC50) of ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided anterior iliopsoas space block in elderly with hip fracture. A total of 27 patients were enrolled with aged ≥65 years, American society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification II-III and undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). We measured the EC50 using Dixon's up-and-down method. Ultrasound-guided AIMSB was performed preoperatively with an initial concentration of 0.2% in the first patient. After a successful or unsuccessful postoperative analgesia, the concentration of local anesthetic was decreased or increased 0.05%, respectively in the next patient. The successful block effect was defined as no sensation to pinprick in the area with femoral nerve, obturator nerve, and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve in 30 min. Meanwhile, the EC50 of ropivacaine was determined by using linear model, linear-logarithmic model, probit regression model, and centered isotonic regression. A total of 12 patients (48%) had a successful block. All patients with a successful block had a postoperative visual analog scale score of <4 in the 12 h. The estimated EC50 values in linear model, linear-logarithmic model, probit regression model, and centered isotonic regression (a nonparametric method) were 0.268%, 0.259%, 0.277%, and 0.289%. The residual standard error of linear model was the smallest (0.1245). The EC50 of ropivacaine in anterior iliopsoas space block under ultrasound guidance is 0.259-0.289%.

Negative Pain Thoughts Questionnaire Short Form (NPTQ-SF) Scores and Outcomes After Arthroscopic Meniscectomy

Background: Pain is multifactorial, and pain intensity has been shown to be influenced by patients’ thoughts. The Negative Pain Thoughts Questionnaire Short Form (NPTQ-SF) can be used to quantify unhelpful negative cognitive biases about pain, but the relationship between negative pain thoughts and orthopaedic surgery outcomes is not known. Purpose: To evaluate the prevalence of negative pain thoughts in patients undergoing arthroscopic meniscectomy using the NPTQ-SF survey and assess the relationship these thoughts have to knee function, general health, pain, and satisfaction before and after surgery. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: In total, 146 patients undergoing arthroscopic meniscectomy were administered the 4-item NPTQ-SF, 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaire, and visual analog scale pain survey preoperatively between July 2021 and August 2022. The same surveys were completed at a minimum of 3 months and no later than 1 year postoperatively by 92 patients confirmed to have undergone meniscectomy. Results: NPTQ-SF scores were correlated with IKDC, SF-12, and satisfaction score preoperatively and at least 3 months postoperatively (mean, 108.5 ± 43.7 days). Preoperative NPTQ-SF scores were significantly negatively correlated with postoperative IKDC (R = −0.284), SF-12 (R = −0.266 and −0.328), and visual analog scale pain (R = 0.294) scores, while a relationship with postoperative satisfaction did not reach statistical significance (P = .067). Patients with a preoperative NPTQ-SF score >8 were less likely to achieve a Patient Acceptable Symptom State on the postoperative IKDC questionnaire (39% vs 63%; P = .03). Patients with a history of a psychiatric or chronic pain diagnoses have worse NPTQ-SF, SF-12, and IKDC scores pre- and postoperatively. Conclusion: The level of negative pain thoughts in patients undergoing meniscectomy is related to knee function, general health, and pain. Patients with a high level of negative pain thoughts are less likely to achieve a favorable outcome from meniscectomy, with a score ≥8 representing a clinically significant threshold for preoperative screening.

Distal Triceps Tendon Repair in Strength Athletes Leads to Satisfactory Return to Sports: A Retrospective Analysis of 22 Cases.

Background: Distal triceps brachii tendon rupture (DTTR) is a relatively rare injury that is common in bodybuilding and high-intensity contact sports and can lead to significant functional impairment of the elbow joint. This study was conducted to evaluate clinical outcomes and the rate of return to sports among competitive bodybuilders and high-demand strength athletes after surgical repair of DTTR. Methods: This retrospective case series was performed in an institutional setting in tertiary health care. Return to sports of 22 competing or high-demand strength athletes (meaning three or more exercises per week) were analyzed pre- and postoperatively after surgical repair of DTTR using a hybrid technique of transosseous sutures and anchor fixation. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze demographic variables, and independent and paired t-tests were used to assess clinical outcomes. Results: The follow-up showed that from pre- to postoperatively, there was no deterioration in the number of sports disciplines (2.4 and 2.5 sporting activities per person, respectively; p = 0.540) or in the frequency of weekly training (4.1 and 4.1 times per person, respectively; p = 0.329). The postoperative visual analog scale for pain (from 6.0 to 1.6, p < 0.001), level of fitness (from 5.1 to 2.6, p = 0.002), and ability to train (from 5.2 to 1.3, p < 0.001) improved significantly. The time of return to sports was 1.5-3 months and 4-6 months after the surgery for ten patients each. The overall rate of return to sports was 95%, whereas 86% returned to the preinjury level of sporting activity. Conclusions: Repair of DTTR leads to high rates of return to sports in competitive athletes.

Comparing Patient-Reported Outcomes with Computational Fluid Dynamics-Derived Nasal Airflow After Nasal Airway Surgery: Prioritizing the Patient's Perception of Nasal Obstruction.

Background: Some patients report persistent nasal obstruction after surgical treatment despite objective improvement. Objective: To compare patients' perceptions of nasal obstruction after surgery with objective nasal airflow as determined by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling: (1) Is perception driven by a more symptomatic side? (2) Can symptom improvement be predicted with CFD modeling? Methods: Pre/postoperative Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) and visual analog scale (VAS) score were collected for patients undergoing nasal obstruction surgery. Pre/postoperative computed tomography was used to generate patient-specific airway models for CFD simulation at 15 L/min resting inspiration. Results: Ten patients (22-53 years, seven men and three women) underwent septoplasty, turbinate reduction, and/or rhinoplasty. Postoperative NOSE was most correlated with postoperative VAS score from the "affected" side (R2 = 0.59, p < 0.01), and postoperative NOSE was strongly predicted by a two-parameter model using parameters only from the "affected" side (R2 = 0.84, adjusted R2 = 0.80, p < 0.01). Conclusion: The postoperative state of the initially "affected" side drives outcomes after nasal obstruction surgery. Surgeries should prioritize improving the "affected" side. A two-parameter model using the VAS and nasal airflow from only the "affected" side strongly predicts NOSE and is promising for the future using virtual planning to individualize procedures to optimize outcome.

Effect of intra-operative Magnesium sulphate on the occurrence of post-operative delirium and insomnia in patients undergoing lumbar fixation: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundOver the last two decades, a large body of literature has focused on studying the prevalence and outcome of the postoperative delirium and sleep disturbance. The aim of this work was to evaluate the effect of intraoperative administration of Magnesium sulphate on the occurrence of post-operative delirium and insomnia in patients undergoing lumbar fixation.MethodsThis prospective randomized controlled trial was carried out on 80 patients indicated for lumbar fixation; 40 of them received conventional general anesthesia with extra administration of intraoperative magnesium sulphate (Mg sulphate group), and the other 40 received conventional general anesthesia only (control group). Both groups were submitted to pre-operative assessment of depression using Beck Depression inventory (BDI) scale, pre-operative assessment of fatigue using a fatigue questionnaire, pre- and post-operative assessment of insomnia using Insomnia severity index (ISI), post-operative assessment of delirium using Memorial delirium assessment scale (MDAS), post-operative assessment of pain using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and pre- and post-operative Quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG).ResultsMg sulphate administration, age, pre-operative BDI, pre-operative ISI, and post-operative VAS were independent predictors of post-operative ISI (P-value < 0.001, 0.047, 0.021, < 0.001, and < 0.001 respectively). Age and post-operative VAS were independent predictors of post-operative MDAS (P-value = 0.008, 0.013 respectively). Mg sulphate administration and pre-operative ISI were independent predictors of post-operative VAS (P-value = 0.010, 0.006 respectively).ConclusionThere was a significant relationship between intraoperative Mg sulphate administration and both post-operative insomnia and pain in unadjusted and adjusted analysis.

Safety and feasibility of enhanced recovery after surgery-based management model for ambulatory pediatric surgical procedures.

There is still some room for optimizing ambulatory pediatric surgical procedures, and the preoperative and postoperative management quality for pediatric patients needs to be improved. To discuss the safety and feasibility of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)-based management model for ambulatory pediatric surgical procedures. We selected 320 pediatric patients undergoing ambulatory surgery from June 2023 to January 2024 at The First People's Hospital of Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture. Of these, 220 received ERAS-based management (research group) and 100 received routine management (control group). General information, postoperative ambulation activities, surgical outcomes (operation time, postoperative gastrointestinal ventilation time, and hospital stay), postoperative pain visual analogue scale, postoperative complications (incision infection, abdominal distension, fever, nausea, and vomiting), and family satisfaction were compared. The general information of the research group (sex, age, disease type, single parent, family history, etc.) was comparable to that of the control group (P > 0.05), but the rate of postoperative (2 h, 4 h, and 6 h after surgery) ambulation activities was statistically higher (P < 0.01), and operation time, postoperative gastrointestinal ventilation time, and hospital stay were markedly shorter (P < 0.05). The research group had lower visual analogue scale scores (P < 0.01) at 12 h and 24 h after surgery and a lower incidence of total postoperative complications than the control group (P = 0.001). The research group had higher family satisfaction than the control group (P = 0.007). The ERAS-based management model was safe and feasible in ambulatory pediatric surgical procedures and worthy of clinical promotion.

Risk factors for postoperative urinary retention in patients underwent surgery for benign anorectal diseases: a nested case–control study

BackgroundPostoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common complication of anorectal surgery. This study was to determine the incidence of POUR in anorectal surgery for benign anorectal diseases, identify its risk factors, and establish a nomogram for prediction of POUR.MethodsA nested case–control study was conducted. The clinical data of patients were collected, and the incidence of POUR was analyzed. Univariate analysis was used to identify the risk factors associated with POUR, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine independent risk factors for POUR. A nomogram for the preoperative prediction of POUR using a logistic regression model was developed (n = 609).ResultsThe incidence of POUR after anorectal surgery for benign anorectal diseases was 19.05%. The independent risk factors for POUR were: female (P = 0.007); male with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) (P = 0.001); postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score > 6 (P = 0.002); patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) (P = 0.016); and a surgery time > 30 min (P = 0.039). In the nomogram, BPH is the most important factor affecting the occurrence of POUR, followed by a postoperative VAS score > 6, PCEA, surgery time > 30 min, and sex has the least influence.ConclusionFor patients undergoing anorectal surgery for benign anorectal diseases, preventive measures can be taken to reduce the risk of POUR, taking into account the following risk factors: female or male with BPH, severe postoperative pain, PCEA, and surgery time > 30 min. Furthermore, we developed and validated an easy-to-use nomogram for preoperative prediction of POUR in anorectal surgery for benign anorectal diseases.Trial registrationChina Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2000039684, 05/11/2020.

A comparative study to assess the effects of intrathecal fentanyl and intrathecal tramadol combined with 0.5% bupivacaine heavy in patients undergoing elective urological surgeries: A prospective randomized study

Background: Urological operations frequently involve the use of spinal anesthesia. In the present scenario, adding different adjuvants to local anesthetic improve its quality and duration has become common. Aims and Objectives: In patients undergoing elective urological procedures, the purpose of this study was to assess the effects of intrathecal fentanyl or tramadol with 0.5% bupivacaine heavy. Materials and Methods: Patients were divided into two groups of 30 patients each, a total of 60 patients aged 20–60 years undergoing elective urological surgeries participated in this prospective, randomized study in which 25 μg fentanyl and 2.5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine heavy were given to Group F, while 25 mg tramadol and 2.5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine heavy were given to Group M. The onset and duration of sensory and motor blockage, the duration of analgesia, post-operative Visual Analog Scale score, hemodynamic changes, and adverse effects were evaluated. Results: Fentanyl had a lower mean time of onset for sensory (2:33±0:22 min vs. 4:50±0:33 min) and motor block (3:36±0:28 min vs. 5:52±0:38 min) (P&lt;0.001), the duration of sensory (185.67±3.155 min vs. 152.60±4.264), motor block (172.00±4.177 min vs. 136.40±5.575 min), and post-operative analgesia was longer in the fentanyl group (P&lt;0.001), whereas the incidence of adverse effects such as pruritus, shivering, and nausea was lower in the tramadol group. Conclusion: The quality and duration of spinal anesthesia were found to be significantly increased by the use of fentanyl as an adjuvant in our study. However, tramadol also produced stable hemodynamics and exhibited fewer adverse effects than fentanyl.

Comparison of Knotless Versus Knot-Tying Suture Anchors for Arthroscopic Repair of Hip Labral Tears.

Both knotless and knot-tying anchors are commonly employed in the arthroscopic repair of hip labral tears. To compare the midterm clinical results of arthroscopic hip labral repair using knot-tying versus knotless suture anchors. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Patients who underwent arthroscopic hip labral repair between January 2017 and January 2021 and who had at least 2 years of follow-up were included. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the suture anchor type: a 2.9-mm knotless suture anchor (knotless group) or a 1.8-mm knot-tying suture anchor (knot-tying group). All patients underwent femoroplasty for cam lesions and acetabular rim trimming for pincer lesions. The modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score-Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain were administered both preoperatively and postoperatively. The consistency of the outcome scores was assessed using the minimal clinically important difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State. The statistical significance between groups was evaluated using the Mann-Whitney test and quantile-based analysis of variance. A total of 413 patients were included: 256 patients in the knotless group (median age, 35 years [interquartile range, 31-38 years]; median follow-up, 34 months) and 157 patients in the knot-tying group (median age, 34 years [interquartile range, 30-38 years]; median follow-up, 25 months). There were no significant differences in postoperative mHHS, HOS-ADL, or iHOT-12 scores between the 2 groups. However, there were significant differences, favoring the knotless group over the knot-tying group, in postoperative HOS-SSS (87 ± 2 vs 86 ± 1, respectively) and VAS pain (1 vs 2, respectively) scores (P < .0001 for both). Postoperative synovitis was found in significantly more patients in the knot-tying group than in the knotless group (17 vs 5, respectively; P = .01). In this study, patients who underwent arthroscopic hip labral repair with knotless suture anchors had slightly better postoperative HOS-SSS and VAS pain scores and a lower incidence of postoperative synovitis compared with patients who underwent repair with knot-tying suture anchors.

Is intrathecal bupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine superior to bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia for a cesarean section? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

This study aimed to investigate whether the administration of intrathecal dexmedetomidine as a bupivacaine adjuvant for caesarean section can prolong the duration of analgesia compared with bupivacaine alone. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain, the time interval to the first analgesic request, the level of sedation, the incidence of adverse effects, and the fetal outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. The study compared the intrathecal administration of bupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine (group BD) to the intrathecal administration of bupivacaine alone (group B) for cesarean sections. Fourteen publications were included. Among patients who underwent spinal anesthesia for a cesarean section, 514 patients received intrathecal bupivacaine alone, and 533 patients received intrathecal bupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine. The onset of sensory and motor block was essentially the same in both groups; the time for sensory and motor block regression was significantly longer in the BD group. Postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) values were similar in group BD when compared to group B. Postoperative VAS scores remained consistently low in Group BD compared to Group B, starting from 1 hour after surgery. The level of sedation measured at the end of the cesarean section in both groups was almost similar. No difference in terms of safety, adverse events, and neonatal outcomes was found between the two groups. Use of intrathecal dexmedetomidine for spinal anesthesia in cesarean section significantly prolongs sensory and motor block compared to using bupivacaine alone as an adjuvant. It also improves analgesia after 1 hour with no difference in the incidence of maternal and neonatal adverse effects compared to bupivacaine alone. The optimal dose of dexmedetomidine to use remains to be ingested.

Short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes with modular long stem for revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundWhen performing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with compromised proximal bone fixation, surgeons must consider using specialized stems with a distal press-fit design. In this study, the authors report on the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients who underwent surgical management with modular diaphyseal press-fit stems. MethodsIn 2017-2021, patients who underwent revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty reconstruction with diaphyseal press-fit stems (Aequalis Adjustable Stem [AS] or Aequalis Flex Revive Stem [RS]; Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) with minimum 1-year follow-up were identified. Patients with complex proximal humerus and scapula fractures, neurological injuries, and custom humeral replacements were excluded. Demographics and clinical follow-up data including range of motion, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), American Shoulder Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation were retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative radiographs were reviewed for aseptic humeral loosening, periprosthetic instability, stress shielding, periprosthetic fractures, and humeral stem failure. ResultsSixty-five patients (29 AS and 36 RS) had mean follow-up of 25 months (standard deviation ± 16). Mean anterior elevation improved from 57° ± 39 preoperative to 121° ± 31 postoperatively. Mean external rotation improved from 3° ± 17 to 34° ± 16. Mean internal rotation improved from 4° ± 13 to 35° ± 26. Mean VAS improved from 6.7 ± 2.2 to 2.9 ± 1.5. Mean SST improved from 13% ± 13% to 65% ± 22%. Mean ASES score improved from 19 ± 13 to 60 ± 18. Mean Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation improved from 25% ± 18% to 71% ± 17%. There were statistically significant differences in mean postoperative VAS (P = .0017), SST (P = .025), and ASES score (P = .0228) in favor of the RS group. There were no other notable differences between groups. The most common complications were aseptic humeral stem loosening (24% vs. 3%, P = .018) and periprosthetic instability (10% vs. 6%, P = .649) for the AS and RS cohorts, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between surgical revision rates between the AS and RS cohorts (24% vs. 8%, respectively. P = .096). DiscussionDiaphyseal press-fit modular humeral stem can provide a viable surgical alternative in compromised proximal humeral bone. At short-term follow-up, the clinical and radiographic outcomes are comparable to other stem designs. Further studies are necessary to identify risks and causes of failure associated with modular diaphyseal press-fit stems.

The efficacy and safety of mini-open (air/water medium) endoscopy-assisted anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

To compare the clinical efficacy of mini-open (air/water medium) endoscopy-assisted anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (MOEA-ACDF) and anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). This study retrospectively analysed the clinical data of CSM patients who received surgical treatment from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2022. Patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical method: the MOEA-ACDF group and the ACDF group. The preoperative and postoperative imaging results at one week and the last follow-up examination were compared between the two groups. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score and neck disability index (NDI) score were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes preoperatively, one week postoperatively and at the last follow-up examination. The minimum follow-up duration was 12 months. A total of 131 CSM patients who underwent surgery at our institution were included, including 61 patients in the MOEA-ACDF group and 70 patients in the ACDF group. In the MOEA-ACDF group, the postoperative C2-C7 Cobb angle and HAVB were significantly greater than the preoperative values (P < 0.05). In the ACDF group, the postoperative C2-C7 Cobb angle was also significantly greater than the preoperative value, and the C2-C7 ROM and HAVB significantly decreased (P < 0.05). The postoperative neurological function of the patients in both groups improved, and the postoperative VAS score and NDI score significantly decreased. Compared with ACDF, MOEA-ACDF is associated with a significantly larger postoperative C2-C7 Cobb angle and significantly better C2-C7 ROM and HAVB, as well as better clinical efficacy (P < 0.05). MOEA-ACDF combines endoscopic systems with ACDF technology to treat CSM, but its clinical efficacy is not inferior to that of ACDF in the short- to intermediate-term. It can effectively and safely restore the cervical intervertebral height, physiological curvature, and range of motion.