Postoperative Speech Perception Research Articles

Cross-Modal Plasticity in Postlingual Hearing Loss Predicts Speech Perception Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation.

Background: Sensory loss may lead to intra- and cross-modal cortical reorganization. Previous research showed a significant correlation between the cross-modal contribution of the right auditory cortex to visual evoked potentials (VEP) and speech perception in cochlear implant (CI) users with prelingual hearing loss (HL), but not in those with postlingual HL. The present study aimed to explore the cortical reorganization induced by postlingual HL, particularly in the right temporal region, and how it correlates with speech perception outcome with a CI. Material and Methods: A total of 53 adult participants were divided into two groups according to hearing ability: 35 had normal hearing (NH) (mean age = 62.10 years (±7.48)) and 18 had profound postlingual HL (mean age = 63.78 years (±8.44)). VEPs, using a 29-channel electroencephalogram (EEG) system, were recorded preoperatively in the 18 patients scheduled for cochlear implantation and in 35 NH adults who served as the control group. Amplitudes and latencies of the P100, N100, and P200 components were analyzed across frontal, temporal, and occipital areas and compared between NH and HL subjects using repeated measures ANOVA. For the HL group, speech perception in quiet was assessed at 6 and 12 months of CI use. Results: No difference was found in amplitudes or latencies of the P100, N100, and P200 VEP components between the NH and HL groups. Further analysis using Spearman correlations between preoperative amplitudes and latencies of the P100, N100, and P200 VEP components at the right temporal electrode position T8 and postoperative speech perception showed that the HL group had either significantly higher or significantly lower amplitudes of the P200 component at the right temporal electrode position T8 compared to the NH controls. The HL subgroup with higher amplitudes had better speech perception than the subgroup with lower amplitudes at 6 months and 12 months of CI use. Conclusions: Preoperative evaluation of cortical plasticity can reveal plasticity profiles, which might help to better predict postoperative speech outcomes and adapt the rehabilitation regimen after CI activation. Further research is needed to understand the susceptibility of each component to cross-modal reorganization and their specific contribution to outcome prediction.

Impact of Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Design on Post-Op Speech Perception.

Electrode array design may impact hearing outcomes in patients who receive cochlear implants. The goal of this work was to assess differences in post operative speech perception among patients who received cochlear implants of differing designs and lengths. Retrospective chart review. Tertiary Care Hospital. Patients (n = 129) received 1 of 9 electrode arrays, which were categorized by design: Lateral wall electrodes (n = 36) included CI522, CI622 (Cochlear Americas), Flex24, and Flex28 (Med El). Midscala electrodes (n = 16) included HiRes Ultra 3D (Advanced Bionics). Perimodiolar electrodes (n = 77) included CI512, CI532, CI612, and CI632 (Cochlear Americas). Speech perception was evaluated using consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) tests and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postimplantation. Perimodiolar electrodes showed significantly higher CNC scores compared to lateral wall electrodes at 6 and 24 months. Perimodiolar electrodes also outperformed midscala electrodes at 12 months. An inverse relationship was observed between electrode length and CNC scores noted at 6, 12, and 24 months. Perimodiolar electrode arrays, which tend to be shorter, demonstrated better speech perception outcomes compared to the longer lateral wall and midscala arrays at some timepoints. These findings suggest a potential advantages of perimodiolar electrodes for optimizing hearing outcomes.

The Predictive Value of Preoperative Measurements of Cochlear Nerve Diameters From MRT and Postoperative Speech Perception in Adult Patients With Cochlear Implant.

The current study aims to investigate whether objective measurements of the cochlear nerve (CN), derived from preoperative MRI images, correlate with postoperative speech perception in CI patients. Retrospective cohort study. University Medical Center, tertiary academic referral center. Patients undergoing a cochlear implant surgery including MED-EL (Synchrony 2, FLEX electrode series; MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria) Cochlear (slim straight electrodes; Cochlear Ltd., Sydney, Australia), Advanced Bionics (HiRes Ultra 3D CI, HiFocus SlimJ electrodes; Sonova, Zürich, Switzerland), and Oticon (Neuro Zti EVO; Oticon A/S, Smørum, Denmark) between 2020 and 2023. Preoperative MRI images were utilized to measure the volume of the modiolus (VM), the cross-sectional areas of the CN (ACN), and for normalization, the area of the facial nerve (AFN) and the area of the internal ear canal (AIEC). Postoperative speech perceptions were assessed through word recognition scores (WRS) at several stages following the first fitting (FF) of the CI processor: immediately after FF, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after FF. Sixty-eight patients were enrolled in this study. A statistically significant positive correlation between the ratio between ACN and AFN (ACN/AFN) and WRSFF was identified (R = 0.36, p < 0.003). However, this correlation disappeared in subsequent follow-up tests. Moreover, upon grouping patients based on their degree of asymmetrical hearing loss, it was observed that the correlation was primarily driven by patients with moderate to severe asymmetrical hearing loss (AHLm) on the contralateral side (R = 0.62, p = 0.0003). The present results suggest that assessing the size of the CN through MRI has limited predictive utility for postoperative speech perceptions during CI consultations. This limitation seems to be particularly relevant for AHLm patients and is confined to the initial activation period.

Stapedotomy Versus Cochlear Implantation for Far Advanced Otosclerosis: Insights From a Patient With Matched Preoperative and Postoperative Function.

To examine patient preference after stapedotomy versus cochlear implantation in a unique case of a patient with symmetrical profound mixed hearing loss and similar postoperative speech perception improvement. An adult patient with bilateral symmetrical far advanced otosclerosis, with profound mixed hearing loss. Stapedotomy in the left ear, cochlear implantation in the right ear. Performance on behavioral audiometry, and subjective report of hearing and intervention preference. A patient successfully underwent left stapedotomy and subsequent cochlear implantation on the right side, per patient preference. Preoperative audiometric characteristics were similar between ears (pure-tone average [PTA] [R: 114; L: 113 dB]; word recognition score [WRS]: 22%). Postprocedural audiometry demonstrated significant improvement after stapedotomy (PTA: 59 dB, WRS: 75%) and from cochlear implant (PTA: 20 dB, WRS: 60%). The patient subjectively reported a preference for the cochlear implant ear despite having substantial gains from stapedotomy. A nuanced discussion highlighting potentially overlooked benefits of cochlear implants in far advanced otosclerosis is conducted. In comparison with stapedotomy and hearing aids, cochlear implantation generally permits greater access to sound among patients with far advanced otosclerosis. Though the cochlear implant literature mainly focuses on speech perception outcomes, an underappreciated benefit of cochlear implantation is the high likelihood of achieving "normal" sound levels across the audiogram.

Predicting Postoperative Speech Perception and Audiometric Thresholds Using Intracochlear Electrocochleography in Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Electrocochleography (ECochG) appears to offer the most accurate prediction of post-cochlear implant hearing outcomes. This may be related to its capacity to interrogate the health of underlying cochlear tissue. The four major components of ECochG (cochlear microphonic [CM], summating potential [SP], compound action potential [CAP], and auditory nerve neurophonic [ANN]) are generated by different cochlear tissue components. Analyzing characteristics of these components can reveal the state of hair and neural cell in a cochlea. There is limited evidence on the characteristics of intracochlear (IC) ECochG recordings measured across the array postinsertion but compared with extracochlear recordings has better signal to noise ratio and spatial specificity. The present study aimed to examine the relationship between ECochG components recorded from an IC approach and postoperative speech perception or audiometric thresholds. In 113 human subjects, responses to 500 Hz tone bursts were recorded at 11 IC electrodes across a 22-electrode cochlear implant array immediately following insertion. Responses to condensation and rarefaction stimuli were then subtracted from one another to emphasize the CM and added to one another to emphasize the SP, ANN, and CAP. Maximum amplitudes and extracochlear electrode locations were recorded for each of these ECochG components. These were added stepwise to a multi-factor generalized additive model to develop a best-fit model predictive model for pure-tone audiometric thresholds (PTA) and speech perception scores (speech recognition threshold [SRT] and consonant-vowel-consonant phoneme [CVC-P]) at 3- and 12-month postoperative timepoints. This best-fit model was tested against a generalized additive model using clinical factors alone (preoperative score, age, and gender) as a null model proxy. ECochG-factor models were superior to clinical factor models in predicting postoperative PTA, CVC-P, and SRT outcomes at both timepoints. Clinical factor models explained a moderate amount of PTA variance ( r2 = 45.9% at 3-month, 31.8% at 12-month, both p < 0.001) and smaller variances of CVC-P and SRT ( r2 range = 6 to 13.7%, p = 0.008 to 0.113). Age was not a significant predictive factor. ECochG models explained more variance at the 12-month timepoint ( r2 for PTA = 52.9%, CVC-P = 39.6%, SRT = 36.4%) compared with the 3-month one timepoint ( r2 for PTA = 49.4%, CVC-P = 26.5%, SRT = 22.3%). The ECochG model was based on three factors: maximum SP deflection amplitude, and electrode position of CM and SP peaks. Adding neural (ANN and/or CAP) factors to the model did not improve variance explanation. Large negative SP deflection was associated with poorer outcomes and a large positive SP deflection with better postoperative outcomes. Mid-array peaks of SP and CM were both associated with poorer outcomes. Postinsertion IC-ECochG recordings across the array can explain a moderate amount of postoperative speech perception and audiometric thresholds. Maximum SP deflection and its location across the array appear to have a significant predictive value which may reflect the underlying state of cochlear health.

Post-operative patient perception of decisional regret in cochlear implant recipients

Importance Decision regret post-surgery has has been linked to health outcomes for a number of elective procedures but is understudied in cochlear implantation satisfaction. Theunpredictability in outcomes may lead to unmet expectations by the recipient. This study is the first study to investigate the decision regret concept in cochlear implant recipients. Objective Tto investigate post-operative decision regret in (CI) recipients. Design This was a prospective cohort study using the validated Ottawa Decision Regret Scale, and whether the CI met the patient’s expectations. Variables potentially associated with decision regret including patient demographics, post-operative speech perception scores, duration of deafness, duration of CI use and age were analyzed using the logistic regression model. Setting This was a multi-center study. Participants were recruited and enrolled from the University of Miami and the University of Kansas in an outpatient setting. Participants Adult, English-speaking CI recipients with at least 6 months of listening experience with their implant. Results Out of 173 58% reported no regret, 27% reported mild, and 15% reported moderate-to-strong regret. Expectations were met in 77% while not meeting expectations in 14%. The remaining 8% were neutral. Decisional regret was significantly associated (p = 0.02) with poor post-operative speech perception. No other variables were associated with regret. Conclusions Post-operative decision regret was reported by 42% of CI recipients. Poor speech perception abilities were associated with increased risk of regret. Further research is required to identify regret risks and provide resources to mitigate regret in CI recipients.

Is the Position of the Basal-Most Electrode Depending on Electrode Array Design and Influencing Postoperative Speech Perception? A Retrospective Analysis of 495 Ears.

The objective of this study is to examine the influence of electrode array design on the position of the basal-most electrode in cochlear implant (CI) surgery and therefore the stimulability of the basal cochlea. Specifically, we evaluated the angular insertion depth of the basal-most electrode in perimodiolar and straight electrode arrays in relation to postoperative speech perception. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 495 patients between 2013 and 2018 using the Cochlear™ Contour Advance® (CA), Cochlear™ Slim Straight® (SSA), or Cochlear™ Slim Modiolar® (SMA) electrode arrays, as well as the MED-EL Flex24 (F24), MED-EL Flex28 (F28), and MED-EL FlexSoft (F31.5) electrode arrays. Cochlear size and the position of the basal-most electrode were measured using rotational tomography or cone beam computed tomography, and the results were compared with postoperative speech perception in monosyllables and numbers. The straight electrode arrays, specifically the F31.5 (31.5 mm length) and the F28 (28 mm length), exhibited a significantly greater angular insertion depth of the basal-most electrode. No significant correlation was found between cochlear morphology measurements and the position of the basal-most electrode artifact. Cochleostomy-inserted electrode arrays showed a significantly higher insertion depth of the basal-most electrode. Nevertheless, the position of the basal-most electrode did not have a significant impact on postoperative speech perception. Straight electrode arrays with longer lengths achieved deeper angular insertion depths of the basal-most electrode. Cochlear morphology does not have a substantial influence on the position of basal-most electrode. The study confirms that the basal area of the cochlea, responsible for high-frequency range during acoustic stimulation, is not the primary region for speech understanding via electrical stimulation with CI.

Outcome Prediction of Speech Perception in Quiet and in Noise for Cochlear Implant Candidates Based on Pre-Operative Measures.

(1) Background: The fitting of cochlear implants (CI) is an established treatment, even in cases with considerable residual hearing but insufficient speech perception. The aim of this study was to evaluate a prediction model for speech in quiet and to provide reference data and a predictive model for postoperative speech perception in noise (SPiN) after CI provision. (2) Methods: CI candidates with substantial residual hearing (either in hearing threshold or in word recognition scores) were included in a retrospective analysis (n = 87). Speech perception scores in quiet 12 months post-surgery were compared with the predicted scores. A generalized linear model was fitted to speech reception thresholds (SRTs) after CI fitting to identify predictive variables for SPiN. (3) Results: About two-thirds of the recipients achieved the expected outcome in quiet or were better than expected. The mean absolute error of the prediction was 13.5 percentage points. Age at implantation was the only predictive factor for SPiN showing a significant correlation (r = 0.354; p = 0.007). (4) Conclusions: Outcome prediction accuracy for speech in quiet was comparable to previous studies. For CI recipients in the included study population, the SPiN outcome could be predicted only based on the factor age.

Frequency-to-Place Mismatch Impacts Cochlear Implant Quality of Life, But Not Speech Recognition.

To retrospectively compare frequency-place mismatch among adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients with lateral wall (LW) and perimodiolar/Mid Scala (PM/MS) arrays, and to quantify the impact of these factors on early post-activation (3 months) speech recognition abilities and CI-specific quality of life. One hundred and twenty-six adult participants were separated into two groups: (1) 83 participants who underwent CI with a PM/MS array and 43 patients who underwent CI with a LW array. All participants completed the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life Profile (CIQOL-35 Profile) instrument. Angular insertion depth and semitone mismatch, which contribute to frequency-place mismatch, were assessed using post-operative CT scans. Word and speech recognition in quiet were determined using the Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) and the AzBio tests, respectively (n = 82 patients). LW arrays were more deeply inserted and exhibited less semitone mismatch compared to PM/MS arrays. No significant relationship was found between semitone mismatch and early post-operative speech perception scores for either PM/MS or LW arrays. However, greater degrees of semitone mismatch were associated with lower CIQOL-35 profile scores for PM/MS arrays. The results of this study indicate that both the degree of frequency-place mismatch, and its impact on CI-specific quality of life, vary by CI array design. 4 Laryngoscope, 134:2898-2905, 2024.

Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Design and Speech Understanding.

Cochlear implant electrode arrays are categorized based on their design as lateral wall (LW) and perimodiolar (PM) electrode arrays. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of LW versus PM designs on postoperative speech perception across multiple manufacturers and over long follow-up durations. Retrospective cohort study. Single academic medical center. A total of 478 adult cochlear implant recipients, implanted between the years 1992 and 2017. PM versus LW cochlear implants. Postoperative Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant Word (CNC-w) and Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) scores between 6 months and 5 years. Across 478 patients, approximately one-third received LW (n = 176, 36.8%), whereas 302 patients received a PM array (63.2%). The PM group had higher CNC-w scores from 6 months to 2 years (52 [interquartile range, 38-68] versus 48 [31-62], p = 0.036) and from 2 to 5 years (58 [43-72] versus 48 [33-66], p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis of patient-averaged scores indicated that the PM group had greater improvement from preoperative scores at all time points after the initial 6 months for both CNC-w ( β = 4.4 [95% confidence interval, 0.6-8.3], p = 0.023) and HINT testing ( β = 4.5 [95% confidence interval, 0.3-8.7], p = 0.038). This study indicates that PM electrode arrays are associated with small increases in postoperative speech perception scores, relative to LW arrays, when assessed across manufacturers, over long time durations, and using multiple outcome instruments. These findings may help guide surgeon selection and patient counseling of cochlear implant arrays.

Temporal bone histopathology in revision cochlear implantation

An increasing number of young infants, as early as six months of age with congenital hearing loss receive cochlear implantation, and it is probable that many of these patients will require revision surgery later in life. The possibility of explantation of the cochlear electrode and reimplantation may cause damage to the cochlea, compromising the speech perception outcome in revision implant is of concern. There is only one prior temporal bone histopathology study to look at the outcome of revision surgery and no prior study evaluating revision cochlear implantation that used the round window approach. We conducted a histopathological study of four temporal bone specimens from four patients who underwent revision cochlear implantation and when available post-operative speech perception tests were evaluated. In all cases, the reimplanted electrode followed into the same fibrous sheath without evidence of additional intracochlear damage due to revision surgery. The intracochlear damage from the initial cochlear implantation appears to be a more important factor in outcomes rather than changes associated with explantation and reimplantation.

Cochlear Implantation in the Elderly: Speech Performance, Associated Factor, Complication, and Surgical Safety.

The guidelines for cochlear implantation (CIs) are expanding, and the number of CI procedures performed on the elderly is increasing. The purpose of this study was to analyze the results and safety of cochlear implantation in the elderly, as well as to evaluate the predictive factors on CI outcomes. The study included 56 patients aged ≥40 years, who received CIs between 2009 and 2020. They were divided into two groups: 27 younger adults (40-64 years) and 29 elderly (>64 years). The study compared their pre- and postoperative speech perception and category of auditory performance (CAP) scores, surgical complications, and hospitalization periods. It also evaluated associated factors in the elderly group by examining categorical and continuous variables and postoperative CAP score. There was a significant improvement in speech recognition tests (both word and sentence) and CAP scores in both groups compared to the pre-implantation scores (p<0.001). Postoperative results were slightly lower in the elderly group than in younger adults for sentence recognition and CAP scores, except for word recognition. No significant associated factors were found on postoperative CAP scores, except for etiology. Postoperative CAP significantly improved in the sudden hearing loss group compared to the groups with other etiologies (p=0.045). The elderly group had more comorbidities than that in the younger adult group (p=0.026), but there were no significant differences in postoperative complications and hospitalization periods. While speech recognition and CAP scores were relatively lower in the elderly group compared to the younger adults, the elderly group showed significant improvements in audiological results after CI. Moreover, CI was safe and well tolerated in elderly patients.

Dynamic Range and Neural Response Threshold in Cochlear Implant Mapping Can Be Useful in Predicting Prognosis Related to Postoperative Speech Perception.

To analyze mapping changes in dynamic range (DR) and neural response threshold (NRT) as prognostic factors for cochlear implant (CI). To analyze whether postoperative speech perception performance could be predicted using DR change and initial NRT. The speech comprehension data of 33 patients with CI were retrospectively analyzed after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of device use. All subjects were adult, postlingually hearing-impaired, and Cochlear Nucleus CI users. Speech perception performance was evaluated using aided pure tone audiometry, consonant, vowel, one-word, two-word, and sentence tests. The averages of initial NRT and DR changes were 197.8±25.9 CU (104-236) and 22.2±18.4 CU (-15-79), respectively. The initial DR was 40.8±16.6 CU. The postoperative DR was 50.3±16.4 CU at 3 months, 58±12.3 CU at 6 months, and 62.9±10.4 CU at 12 months. A gradual increase of DR was observed during the first year of CI. Compared with the initial DR, significant increases in DR were observed at 3 (p<0.05), 6 (p<0.001), and 12 (p<0.001) months. Compared with initial speech performance outcomes, a significant gain in all performance outcomes was achieved at 12 months (p<0.001). Patients with low NRT after CI surgery could initially set DR to a wider range and had better final speech perception outcomes. Conversely, patients with high NRT after CI surgery had to set up a gradual increase in DR while adjusting the T-C level, and the final speech perception outcomes were worse. DR and NRT, the main CI mapping variables, can help predict prognosis related to speech perception outcomes after CI surgery. In conclusion, the post-CI speech perception is better with a lower initial NRT, wider final DR, or younger age.

Post-operative evaluation of computed tomography imaging following cochlear implantation

PurposeThis study utilized an automated segmentation algorithm to assess the cochlear implant electrode array within the cochlea and investigate its impact on audiologic outcomes as measured by post-operative speech perception scores. Furthermore, manual evaluations of electrode placement were compared to automatic segmentation methods to determine their accuracy in predicting post-operative audiologic outcomes. Materials and methodsThis retrospective chart review was conducted at a tertiary care referral center involving adult post-lingually deafened cochlear implant recipients implanted from 2015 to 2019. Patients with appropriate postoperative imaging and speech testing were included. Patients were excluded if non-English speaking, had a cognitive deficit, or a labyrinthine malformation. Automated and manual methods were used to analyze computed tomography (CT) scans and correlate the findings with post-operative speech perception scores and detection of electrode translocation. ResultsAmong the 47 patients who met inclusion criteria, 15 had electrode translocations confirmed by automatic segmentation methods. Controlling for CI usage and pre-operative AzBio scores, patients with translocation exhibited significantly lower consonant-nucleus consonant (CNC) and AzBio scores at 6-months post-implantation compared to patients with ST insertions. Moreover, the number of translocated electrode contacts was significantly associated with post-operative CNC scores. Manual evaluations of electrode location were predictive but less sensitive to electrode translocations when compared with automated 3D segmentation. ConclusionsPlacement of CI electrode contacts within ST without translocation into SV, leads to improved audiologic outcomes. Manual assessment of electrode placement via temporal bone CT, without 3D reconstruction, provides a less sensitive method to determine electrode placement than automated methods. Level of evidenceLevel 4. Lay summaryThis study investigated the impact of electrode placement on speech outcomes for cochlear implant recipients. Using advanced imaging techniques, the researchers compared automated and manual methods for evaluating electrode position and examined the relationship between electrode translocation and audiologic outcomes. The findings revealed that proper placement within the cochlea without translocation into inappropriate compartments inside the cochlea improves speech understanding. Manual evaluations were somewhat accurate but less sensitive in detecting translocations compared to automated methods, which offer more precise predictions of patient outcomes. These results contribute to our understanding of factors influencing cochlear implant success and highlight the importance of optimizing electrode placement for improved speech outcomes.

Electrode-Modiolus Distance Affects Speech Perception for Lateral Wall Electrodes.

The goal of this study was to use cone-beam computed tomography to locate the electrode-modiolus distance (EMD) and correlate this with speech perception in cochlear implant (CI) recipients of the 31.5-mm lateral wall (LW) electrode arrays. Retrospective review. Forty-five child CI recipients with prelingual profound sensorineural hearing loss of inserted 31.5-mm LW arrays listening with a CI-alone device. Stepwise forward multiple linear regression was performed to control and reduce the variability in implant performance to determine whether EMD affects speech perception. Electrode location (angular insertion depth [AID], EMD), together with the electrode impedance (EI), surgical approach, sex, CI age, and preimplant hearing aid usage were estimated as independent variables. The dependent variables were the Meaningful Use of Speech Scale (MUSS) and parents' evaluation of children's aural/oral performance (PEACH) assessed with the CI alone at 12 months postactivation. EMD and CI age were predictive variables for PEACH/MUSS. A negative correlation was found between AID and EMD (r = -0.56, p < 0.01), whereas EMD had a moderately positive correlation with EI (r = 0.32, p < 0.01). The best "location-related" predictor of postoperative speech perception was EMD with a 31.5-mm array among CI-alone users.

Audiogram Configuration, Molecular Etiology, and Outcome of Cochlear Implantation in Postlingual Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder.

To explore the diverse molecular etiologies of postlingual auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) and report on the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) thresholds and the outcome of cochlear implantation (CI). Patients with late-onset, progressive hearing loss who went through molecular genetic testing were enrolled. Type of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) was classified as flat, reverse-slope, midfrequency, downsloping, or ski slope. We identified postlingual ANSD subjects through diagnostic tracts applied differently depending on the degree of SNHL. For CI recipients, individual ECAP thresholds, postoperative speech perception abilities, and the genetic cause were analyzed. The detection rate of ANSD among patients with postlingual SNHL was 5.1% (15/293 probands). Diverse genetic etiologies were identified in 7 (46.6%) of the 15 postlingual ANSD subjects, the genetic cause being found exclusively in subjects with reverse-slope SNHL. The pattern of intraoperative ECAP responses was also diverse and showed some correlation with the genetic etiology. Despite the diverse molecular etiology and ECAP responses, CI in postlingual ANSD patients, including those with features involving the postsynaptic component, yielded significant improvements in speech understanding. This study proposes a differentiated diagnostic approach that focuses on both poor speech discrimination and reverse-slope hearing loss for the diagnosis of ANSD. Based on the improvement of speech understanding from all cochlear implantees with ANSD as well as the correlation between the genetic etiology and ECAP thresholds, we suggest that CI can significantly benefit ANSD subjects even those with unknown etiologies unless there is overt peripheral neuropathy.

Characteristics of the Summating Potential Measured Across a Cochlear Implant Array as an Indicator of Cochlear Function.

The underlying state of cochlear and neural tissue function is known to affect postoperative speech perception following cochlear implantation. The ability to assess these tissues in patients can be performed using intracochlear electrocochleography (IC ECochG). One component of ECochG is the summating potential (SP) that appears to be generated by multiple cochlear tissues. Its qualities may be able to detect the presence of functional inner hair cells, but evidence for this is limited in human cochleae. This study aimed to examine the IC SP characteristics in cochlear implantation recipients, its relationship to preoperative speech perception and audiometric thresholds, and to other IC ECochG components. This is a retrospective analysis of 113 patients' IC ECochG recordings across the array in response to a 500 Hz tone burst stimulus. Responses to condensation and rarefaction stimuli were then subtracted from one another to emphasize the cochlear microphonic and added to one another to emphasize the SP, auditory nerve neurophonic, and compound action potential. Patients were grouped based on their maximum SP deflection being large and positive (+SP), large and negative (-SP), or minimal (0 SP) to further investigate these relationships. Patients in the +SP group had better preoperative speech perception (mean consonant-vowel-consonant phoneme score 46%) compared to the -SP and 0 SP groups (consonant-vowel-consonant phoneme scores 34% and 36%, respectively, difference to +SP: p < 0.05). Audiometric thresholds were lowest for +SP (mean pure-tone average 50 dB HL), then -SP (65 dB HL), and highest for 0 SP patients (70 dB HL), but there was not a statistical significance between +SP and -SP groups (p > 0.1). There were also distinct differences between SP groups in the qualities of their other ECochG components. These included the +SP patients having larger cochlear microphonic maximum amplitude, more apical SP peak electrode locations, and a more spatially specific SP magnitude growth pattern across the array. Patients with large positive SP deflection in IC ECochG have preoperatively better speech perception and lower audiometric thresholds than those without. Patterns in other ECochG components suggest its positive deflection may be an indicator of cochlear function.

Impedance Change as an Indicator of Cochlear Implant Failure.

In February 2020, Advanced Bionics initiated a field action notice to remove the MS Ultra (V1) implant from circulation. In this study, we quantify a single site's incidence with device failure and examine the relationship between impedance change and declining speech perception. Retrospective/cohort study. Tertiary healthcare center. Forty-nine adult patients (52 devices) were implanted between October 2017 and December 2019, with the following exclusion criteria: <18 years of age, medical/surgical failures, and lack of English-language proficiency. Diagnostic. Postoperative speech perception (AzBio sentence test) scores at 12 months postactivation were compared with repeat testing at 6- to 12-month intervals. Degree of change in impedances from 1 month postactivation was analyzed at similar intervals. Device failures were suspected when impedance levels on three or more electrodes dropped to <3.5 kΩ and AzBio scores declined >15%. Device failures were confirmed through analyses completed by the manufacturer. To date, 21% (11/52) of devices have met all three criteria for a confirmed failure with an average decline in speech perception of 27.7 ± 22%. The average length of time for detection of device failure was 21.9 ± 5 months postimplantation. An additional 7 devices (13%) are currently being monitored for failure but have not yet met full criteria. There was no predictive relationship between degree of impedance change and speech perception scores. Electrodes along the entire array (channels 1-16) can be affected. Impedance values can be used as a reliable indicator of device malfunction, thus facilitating patient counseling and early intervention. No correlation was identified between impedance changes and speech perception scores.

Speech Perception Performance in Cochlear Implant Recipients Correlates to the Number and Synchrony of Excited Auditory Nerve Fibers Derived From Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials.

Many studies have assessed the performance of individuals with cochlear implants (CIs) with electrically evoked compound action potentials (eCAPs). These eCAP-based studies have focused on the amplitude information of the response, without considering the temporal firing properties of the excited auditory nerve fibers (ANFs), such as neural latency and synchrony. These temporal features have been associated with neural health in animal studies and, consequently, could be of importance to clinical CI outcomes. With a deconvolution method, combined with a unitary response, the eCAP can be mathematically unraveled into the compound discharge latency distribution (CDLD). The CDLD reflects both the number and the temporal firing properties of excited ANFs. The present study aimed to determine to what extent the CDLD derived from intraoperatively recorded eCAPs is related to speech perception in individuals with CIs. This retrospective study acquired data on monosyllabic word recognition scores and intraoperative eCAP amplitude growth functions from 124 adult patients with postlingual deafness that received the Advanced Bionics HiRes 90K device. The CDLD was determined for each recorded eCAP waveform by deconvolution. Each of the two Gaussian components of the CDLD was described by three parameters: the amplitude, the firing latency (the average latency of each component of the CDLD), and the variance of the CDLD components (an indication of the synchronicity of excited ANFs). Apart from these six CDLD parameters, the area under the CDLD curve (AUCD) and the slope of the AUCD growth function were determined as well. The AUCD was indicative of the total number of excited ANFs over time. The slope of the AUCD growth function indicated the increases in the number of excited ANFs with stimulus level. Associations between speech perception and each of these eight CDLD-related parameters were investigated with linear mixed modeling. In individuals with CIs, larger amplitudes of the two CDLD components, greater AUCD, and steeper slopes of the AUCD growth function were all significantly associated with better speech perception. In addition, a smaller latency variance in the early CDLD component, but not in the late, was significantly associated with better speech recognition scores. Speech recognition was not significantly dependent on CDLD latencies. The AUCD and the slope of the AUCD growth function provided a similar explanation of the variance in speech perception (R 2 ) as the eCAP amplitude, the slope of the amplitude growth function, the amplitude, and variance of the first CDLD component. The results demonstrate that both the number and the neural synchrony of excited ANFs, as revealed by CDLDs, are indicative of postimplantation speech perception in individuals with a CI. Because the CDLD-based parameters yielded a higher significance than the eCAP amplitude or the AGF slope, the authors conclude that CDLDs can serve as a clinical predictor of the survival of ANFs and that they have predictive value for postoperative speech perception performance. Thus, it would be worthwhile to incorporate the CDLD into eCAP measures in future clinical applications.

Promontory Electrocochleography Recordings to Predict Speech-Perception Performance in Cochlear Implant Recipients.

1) To determine the relationship of electrocochleography (ECochG) responses measured on the promontory with responses measured at the round window (RW) and various intracochlear sites. 2) To evaluate if promontory ECochG responses correlate with postoperative speech-perception performance using the cochlear implant (CI). Prospective cohort study. Tertiary referral center. Ninety-six adult CI recipients with no cochlear malformations or previous otologic surgery. Acoustically evoked ECochG responses were measured intraoperatively at both extracochlear and intracochlear locations. ECochG total response (ECochG-TR), a measure of residual cochlear function, was calculated by summing the fast Fourier transformation amplitudes in response to 250-Hz to 2-kHz acoustic stimuli. Speech-perception performance was measured at 3 months. There were strong linear correlations for promontory ECochG-TR with the ECochG-TRs measured at the RW ( r = 0.95), just inside scala tympani ( r = 0.91), and after full insertion ( r = 0.83). For an individual subject, the morphology of the ECochG response was similar in character across all positions; however, the response amplitude increased from promontory to RW (~1.6-fold) to just inside scala tympani (~2.6-fold), with the largest response at full insertion (~13.1-fold). Promontory ECochG-TR independently explained 51.8% of the variability ( r2 ) in consonant-nucleus-consonant at 3 months. Promontory ECochG recordings are strongly correlated with responses previously recorded at extracochlear and intracochlear sites and explain a substantial portion of the variability in CI performance. These findings are a critical step in supporting translation of transtympanic ECochG into the clinic preoperatively to help predict postoperative CI performance.