Postoperative Recurrent Instability Research Articles

Comparative study of two different horizontal stabilisation methods in arthroscopically assisted coracoclavicular stabilisation for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations-Good clinical outcome and no correlation to recurrent anteroposterior instability.

The hypothesis of this study was that acromioclavicular K-wire transfixation is noninferior to horizontal FiberTape cerclage in terms of vertical and horizontal stability in the short follow-up period of acute acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations fixed with an arthroscopically assisted coracoclavicular single bundle endobutton cerclage system. The secondary aim was to investigate the impact of postoperative recurrent instability on clinical outcomes in these populations. In this consecutive clinical trial, all patients who underwent surgery for acute AC joint dislocation between January 2017 and December 2021 were included. Two groups were formed according to the additional AC stabilisation technique (K-wire group, cerclage group). Clinical examination and bilateral radiologic analysis (Zanca stress view, Alexander view) were performed with a follow-up period of at least 12 months. Satisfaction, return to sports, active range of motion, global shoulder scores and specific shoulder scores including constant score, disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score and ACJ instability score (ACJI) were evaluated. Complications, including recurrent instability, and revision rate were assessed. Included were 59 patients (32 K-wire group, 27 cerclage group, 92% male, median follow-up 33 months). No significant differences were found in the clinical outcome parameters between the different techniques, except for the DASH value (superior in the K-wire group). Recurrent anteroposterior instability was radiographically detected in 27% of patients. No correlation was found between anteroposterior instability and clinical outcome parameters. There was no revision surgery due to chronic ACJ instability. Horizontal ACJ stabilisation with temporary K-wire transfixation does not appear to be inferior to a FiberTape cerclage technique in acute ACJ dislocations stabilised in an arthroscopically assisted single bundle DogBone technique. Recurrent ACJ instability detected radiographically does not necessarily correlate with the functional outcome and can be well compensated. Level III.

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Remplissage in Anterior Shoulder Instability Results in Fewer Redislocations Than Bankart Repair Alone at Medium-term Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: A multicenter, double-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing isolated Bankart repair (NO REMP) to Bankart repair with remplissage (REMP) reported benefits of remplissage in reducing recurrent instability at 2 years postoperative. The ongoing benefits beyond this time point are yet to be explored. Purpose: To (1) compare medium-term (3 to 9 years) outcomes of these previously randomized patients undergoing isolated Bankart repair (NO REMP) or Bankart repair with remplissage (REMP) to manage recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability; (2) examine the failure rate, overall recurrent instability, and reoperation rate. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: Recruitment and randomization for the original randomized trial occurred between 2011 and 2017. Patients ≥14 years diagnosed with recurrent traumatic anterior shoulder instability with an engaging Hill-Sachs defect of any size were included. Those with a glenoid defect >15% were excluded. In 2020, participants were contacted by telephone and asked standardized questions regarding ensuing instances of subluxation, dislocation, or reoperation on their study shoulder. “Failure” was defined as a redislocation, and “overall recurrent instability” was described as a redislocation or ≥2 subluxations. Descriptive statistics, relative risk, and Kaplan-Meier survival curve analyses were performed. Results: A total of 108 participants were randomized, of whom 50 in the NO REMP group and 52 in the REMP group were included in the analyses in the original study. The mean number of months from surgery to the final follow-up was 49.3 and 53.8 months for the NO REMP and REMP groups, respectively. Failure rates were 22% (11/50) in the NO REMP group versus 8% (4/52) in the REMP group. Rates of overall recurrent instability were 30% (15/50) in the NO REMP group versus 10% (5/52) in the REMP group. Survival curves were significantly different, favoring REMP in both scenarios. Conclusion: For the treatment of traumatic recurrent anterior shoulder instability with a Hill-Sachs lesion and subcritical glenoid bone loss (<15%), a significantly lower rate of overall postoperative recurrent instability was observed with arthroscopic Bankart repair and remplissage than with isolated Bankart repair at a medium-term follow-up (mean of 4 years). Patients who did not receive a remplissage experienced a failure (redislocated) earlier and had a higher rate of revision/reoperation than those who received a concomitant remplissage. Registration: NCT01324531 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Outcomes of Shoulder Instability Surgery in Competitive Wrestlers: Outcomes, Reoperations, and Return to Play at 5 Years’ Mean Follow-up

Background: Wrestling is a physically demanding sport with young athletes prone to traumatic shoulder instability and a paucity of data evaluating the results of shoulder instability surgery (SIS). Purpose: To assess reoperation rates, patient-reported outcomes, and return to wrestling (RTW) after SIS in a cohort of competitive wrestlers. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: All competitive wrestlers with a history of shoulder instability and subsequent surgery at a single institution between 1996 and 2020 were identified. All directions of shoulder instability (anterior shoulder instability [ASI], posterior shoulder instability [PSI], and traumatic multidirectional shoulder instability [TMDI]) were analyzed. Exclusions included revision SIS and <2 years of follow-up. Athletes were contacted for determination of complications, RTW, and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index scores. Results: Ultimately, 104 wrestlers were included with a mean age at initial instability of 16.9 years (range, 12.0-22.7 years), mean age at surgery of 18.9 years (range, 14.0-29.0 years), and a mean follow-up of 5.2 years (range, 2.0-22.0 years). A total of 58 (55.8%) wrestlers were evaluated after a single shoulder instability event, while 46 (44.2%) sustained multiple events before evaluation. ASI was the most common direction (n = 79; 76.0%), followed by PSI (n = 14; 13.5%) and TMDI (n = 11; 10.6%). Surgical treatment was most commonly an arthroscopic soft tissue stabilization (n = 88; 84.6%), with open soft tissue repair (n = 13; 12.5%) and open bony augmentation (n = 3; 2.9%) performed less frequently. RTW occurred in 57.3% of wrestlers at a mean of 9.8 months. Recurrent instability was the most common complication, occurring in 18 (17.3%) wrestlers. Revision SIS was performed in 15 (14.4%) wrestlers. Across the entire cohort, survivorship rates free from recurrent instability and revision surgery were 90.4% and 92.5% at 2 years, 71.9% and 70.7% at 5 years, and 71.9% and 66.5% at 10 years, respectively. Preoperative recurrent instability was an independent risk factor for postoperative recurrent instability (hazard ratio, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.33-11.03; P = .012). Conclusion: Competitive wrestlers with multiple dislocations before initial clinical evaluation were 3.8 times more likely to experience postoperative recurrent instability. Patients should be counseled that despite SIS, only 57.3% returned to wrestling after surgery.

Bone formation of the coracoid bone graft after the Bristow procedure assessed using three-dimensional computed tomography

BackgroundThe Bristow procedure has been shown to be a reliable method to prevent recurrent anterior shoulder instability by compensating for glenoid bone loss and producing the sling effect. The degree of postoperative morphological change in the coracoid bone graft is speculated to influence glenohumeral joint stability; however, the details of these changes after the Bristow procedure remain unknown. This study was performed to quantify the postoperative change in the coracoid bone graft volume as assessed by three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT). MethodsThe Bristow procedure was performed on 17 shoulders in 17 patients from August 2018 to January 2020. All patients were men, and their mean age at surgery was 17.9 years. The mean follow-up duration was 21.4 months. Within the first week after the operation (Time 0) and at the final follow-up, 3D-CT was used to determine the total coracoid bone graft volume. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) shoulder score, the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score, and the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). ResultsThe mean volume of the total coracoid bone graft was 1.26 ± 0.29 cm3 at Time 0 and 1.90 ± 0.36 cm3 at the final follow-up (p < 0.0001). The mean JOA score, UCLA score, and WOSI were significantly better at the final follow-up than preoperatively (p < 0.001). No postoperative infection, neurovascular injury, or recurrent instability of the glenohumeral joint occurred. ConclusionsIn the Bristow procedure, the volume of the total coracoid bone graft as shown by 3D-CT was significantly greater at the final follow-up than at Time 0, and bone formation of the coracoid bone graft was found after the Bristow procedure.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of arthroscopic Bankart repair versus open Latarjet reconstruction in anterior shoulder instability.

The ideal surgical treatment for anterior shoulder instability is still under debate. In the healthcare setting, both clinical and economic factors must be considered for optimal resource allocation. From the clinical perspective, the Instability Severity Index Score (ISIS) is a helpful and validated tool for surgeons, although a gray area between 4 and 6 exists. In fact, patients with an ISIS < 4 and > 6 can be treated effectively with arthroscopic Bankart repair and open Latarjet, respectively. The purpose of this study was to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of arthroscopic Bankart repair versus open Latarjet in patients with an ISIS between 4 and 6. A decision-tree model was constructed to simulate the clinical scenario of an anterior shoulder dislocation patient with an ISIS between 4 and 6. Based on previously published literature, outcome probabilities and utility values in the form of Western Ontario Instability Score (WOSI) were assigned to each branch of the tree, alongside institutional cost. The primary outcome assessed was an Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the two procedures. Eden-Hybbinette was also considered in the model as a salvage procedure for failed Latarjet. A two-way sensitivity analysis was performed to identify the most impactful parameters on the ICER upon their variation within a pre-determined interval. Base case cost was 1245.57 € (1220.48-1270.65 €) for arthroscopic Bankart repair, 1623.10 € (1580.82-1665.39 €) for open Latarjet and 2.373.95 € (1940.81-2807.10 €) for Eden-Hybbinette. Base-case ICER was 9570.23 €/WOSI. Sensitivity analysis showed that the most impactful parameters were the utility of arthroscopic Bankart repair, the probability of success of open Latarjet, the probability of undergoing surgery after post-operative recurrence of instability and the utility of Latarjet. Of these, utility of arthroscopic Bankart repair and Latarjet had the most significant impact on the ICER. From a hospital perspective, open Latarjet was more cost-effective than arthroscopic Bankart repair in preventing further shoulder instability in patients with an ISIS between 4 and 6. Despite its several limitations, this is the first study to analyze this subgroup of patients from a European hospital setting from both an economic and clinical perspective. This study can help surgeons and administrations in the decision-making process. Further clinical studies are needed to prospectively analyze both aspects to further delineate the best strategy.

Arthroscopic Dynamic Anterior Stabilization Using Either Long Head of the Biceps or Conjoined Tendon Transfer for Anterior Shoulder Instability Results in a Similarly Low Recurrence Rate

To compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic dynamic anterior stabilization (DAS) between transferring the long head of the biceps (DAS-LHB) and the conjoined tendon (DAS-CT) for anterior shoulder instability with <15% glenoid bone loss. From January 2016 to May 2019, a total of 63 patients who underwent DAS for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation with <15% glenoid bone loss were included, comprising 33 patients in DAS-LHB group and 30 patients in DAS-CT group. Clinical outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at a minimum 3-year follow-up, including patient-reported outcomes, range of motion, and return to sports (RTS). Postoperative recurrent instability (including dislocation, subluxation, and subjective instability with a positive apprehension test), revisions and complications also were recorded. No significant demographic characteristics difference was detected between the DAS-LHB (26.3 ± 7.9 years) and DAS-CT groups (26.0 ± 6.7 years). At the latest follow-up, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in functional scores: Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (14.8 ± 2.8 vs 15.2 ± 3.6), Rowe score (95.9 ± 6.5 vs 93.2 ± 10.2), visual analog scale for pain (0.8 ± 1.2 vs 0.7 ± 1.7), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (95 ± 8.8 vs 95.2 ± 9.1) (all P > .218). No significant difference was detected between groups in the rates of RTS (90.1% vs 86.7%, P= .700) and RTS at previous level (78.7% vs 73.3%, P= .258), respectively. No recurrent dislocation occurred in either group. One patient felt occasional subluxation in the DAS-LHB group, and one was positive for the apprehension test in each group. One patient presented with postoperative shoulder stiffness and underwent a secondary arthroscopic debridement in the DAS-CT group. Comparable rates of recurrence, complication, return to sports, and subjective shoulder function were observed between DAS-LHB and DAS-CT groups. Level III, retrospective comparative therapeutic trial.

Effect of Cross-sectional Area of the Hamstring Tendon Autograft on Failure Rate or Clinical Outcomes After Double-Bundle ACL Reconstruction: Tendon Autograft.

In previous studies examining the relationship between graft size and failure rate after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), graft size was determined as diameter of the bone tunnel, and graft failure was defined as revision surgery. Consequently, the correlation between graft size and postoperative recurrent instability could not be assessed. (1) To intraoperatively measure the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the hamstring tendon (HT) autograft and compare the CSA of the autograft with the bone tunnel and (2) to assess the effect of the graft CSA on postoperative graft failure among patients who underwent double-bundle ACLR. Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. The study included 129 patients who underwent double-bundle ACLR using an HT autograft (mean ± SD age, 16.7 ± 1.7 years; all with a Tegner activity level ≥6). All patients had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. During surgery, the graft CSA was measured using an area micrometer, combining the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) grafts. The total area of the bone tunnel was defined as the combined CSAs of the AM and PL tunnels as calculated by the diameter of the drill. The relationship between the CSAs of the combined HT graft and the bone tunnel was statistically compared, as was the relationship between graft CSAs and graft failure, defined as reinjury, recurrent instability manifested as quantitative laxity measurement, or revision ACLR. The CSAs of the midsubstance of the combined AM and PL graft significantly correlated with those of the bone tunnels (femoral side, R 2 = 0.334, P < .0001; tibial side, R 2 = 0.421, P < .0001). As for the relationship between the graft CSA and ACLR failure, there was no significant difference in the graft CSAs between the groups with and without graft failure in any of the failure criteria (P = .188). The graft CSA was not a predictor of early failure after double-bundle ACLR using an HT autograft in this patient population.

Double-Limb Graft Versus Single-Limb Graft Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Recurrent Patellar Dislocation: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies

Background: The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the most important stabilizer of lateral dislocation of the patella. Single-limb (SL) and double-limb (DL) graft MPFL reconstructions have been increasingly used to treat recurrent patellar dislocations, but the clinical efficacy of SL versus DL graft MPFL reconstructions remains controversial owing to the inconsistent conclusions of previous studies. Purpose: This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of SL and DL graft MPFL reconstructions for patients with recurrent patellar dislocation by conducting a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. Study Design: Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies. The retrieval time was up to July 25, 2022. Two evaluators independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of the enrolled studies. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software. Results: A total of 4 randomized controlled trials and 3 cohort studies with 451 patients were included. The joint stability and functional scores in both groups improved significantly from baseline. When compared with SL graft reconstruction, DL graft reconstruction provided reduced recurrent instability (P = .01), anterior patella–related pain (P = .02), and patellar lateral shift rate (P = .02). Regarding functional recovery, patients undergoing DL graft reconstruction presented better scores on the Kujala (P < .001), Tegner (P = .009), and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) (P < .001) but similar Lysholm scores as compared with SL graft reconstruction. No statistically significant difference was found between the techniques in the reduction of the patellar tilt angle, complications other than anterior patella–related pain, or postoperative pain. Conclusion: When compared with SL graft MPFL reconstruction, DL graft MPFL reconstruction yielded better outcomes in terms of postoperative recurrent instability, anterior patella–related pain, patellar lateral shift rate, Kujala score, Tegner score, and IKDC score. The amount of high-quality evidence is insufficient, so this conclusion should be interpreted with caution.

Poster 182: Beach Chair vs Lateral Decubitus Surgical Positioning for Arthroscopic Anterior Shoulder Stabilization: A Retrospective Comparison of Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes

Objectives:Surgical positioning can affect intra- and post-operative complication rates for many reasons, including potential differences in anatomic approaches and proximity to nearby nerves. The beach chair and lateral decubitus positions are the two most common positions for shoulder arthroscopy, and each offers their own unique advantages and disadvantages for surgeons. Beach chair allows for an easier transition to open surgery if necessary, and also has a lower incidence rate of neuropathies, relative to lateral decubitus. However, the lateral decubitus positioning allows for better access to the glenohumeral joint, easier visualization of the labrum, and greater circumferential access to the joint. The surgical position is often selected according to each individual surgeon’s preference, with no clear superiority of one position over the other. This study was conducted to compare clinical and patient-reported outcomes between patients who underwent arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization in beach chair vs. lateral decubitus positions.Methods:A list of all patients diagnosed with the CPT codes 29806 and 29807 from 2015-2019 was obtained from the medical records. Patients were only included if anterior instability was confirmed, arthroscopic surgery was performed in response to shoulder instability, and a minimum of 2-year follow-up was available. Data collected for eligible patients includes: pathology present (Hill-Sachs lesion, bony Bankart lesion), number and location of anchors used, surgery duration, intra-operative and post-operative complications, recurrent instability, reoperation, and revision. Patients were also contacted to complete patient-reported outcome surveys including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Oxford Shoulder Score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and a return to sport (RTS) questionnaire. Demographic, intra-operative data, and post-operative outcomes were compared between patients who underwent surgery in beach chair vs lateral decubitus positioning.Results:294 patients were included in this study, 162 patients who underwent surgery in the lateral decubitus position and 132 in beach chair position with an average follow-up of 3.3 years. There were no significant differences in demographics, concomitant surgeries, prevalence of Hill-Sachs and bony Bankart lesions, surgery duration, or intra-operative complications between groups (all p>0.05). Beach chair was associated with an increased number of anchors used (4.0 vs. 3.3, p=0.01) and a smaller proportion of inferior anchors being placed at the 6 o’clock position (8.3% vs. 25.0%, p=0.022) (Table 1). Rates of post-operative dislocations, recurrent instability, reoperations, all complications, and RTS also did not differ between groups (all p>0.05). Beach chair position had a trend for increase in revision rate but was not significant (beach chair 6.1% vs. lateral decubitus 1.9%, p=0.069). Finally, there was no difference between groups regarding post-operative ASES, SANE, and Oxford Shoulder Scores (all p>0.05).Conclusions:Surgical positioning for arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization did not affect post-operative clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Lateral decubitus patient positioning was associated with the use of fewer anchors and an increased proportion of inferior anchors placed at the 6 o’clock position of the labrum.Table 1.Comparison of intra-operative data and post-operative outcomes between patients who underwent shoulder stabilization surgery in the beach chair vs. lateral decubitus position. SLAP=superior labral tear anterior to posterior, RTS=return to sport, ASES=American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, SANE=Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation. Categorical data is presented as n (%), and continuous data is presented as mean ± standard deviation. Statistically significant differences are in bold.

Paper 71: Remplissage reduces the risk of postoperative recurrent instability versus Bankart repair alone: Medium-term results from a randomized controlled trial

Objectives:Based on findings from our multi-center, double-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing arthroscopic Bankart repair with/without remplissage for the treatment of traumatic recurrent shoulder instability there is a greater risk of postoperative recurrent instability in patients without a remplissage at two years follow-up. The objective of the current study is to determine whether our short-term findings change with medium-term follow-up.Methods:This was a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial with two 1:1 parallel groups conducted at two sites. Patients were randomized intra-operatively to an arthroscopic Bankart with remplissage (REMP) or isolated Bankart repair (NO REMP) between 2011 and 2017. Inclusion criteria were patients 14 years or older diagnosed with traumatic anterior shoulder instability with a glenoid defect >15% and the presence of a Hill-Sachs defect (of any size). Patients were contacted by telephone (Spring 2020) and asked standardized questions to determine whether any additional information regarding subluxations, dislocation or additional surgery occurred since their two-year follow-up. “Recurrent instability” was defined as patient-reported dislocation, or two or more episodes of subluxation. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed to assess survival distribution between groups. For the time factor in the survival analysis, the number of months from time of surgery to outcome (either failure or no failure) was based on the time of the long-term follow-up phone call, or from the time of last reported outcome based on clinical or study follow-ups, whichever was the greatest. These were conducted for: 1) recurrent instability and 2) dislocations. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were also calculated.Results:Study groups were similar at baseline with respect to age, gender and BMI. Fifty-four patients were randomized to each study group at the time of the original study. , with 52 REMP and 50 NO REMP included in the analyses up to 24-months post-operative. Of those, 36 from each group were available for mid-term follow-up. Mean months (mean) from surgery to last follow-up was 53.8 for REMP and 49.3 for NO REMP. The rate of postoperative recurrent instability at medium term follow-up was 10% (5/52) in the REMP group at an average of 24 months and 30% (15/50) in NO REMP at an average of 19.5 months (p=0.010). The odds ratio of recurrent instability in the NO REMP group relative to the REMP group was 4.029 (1.337-12.135; p=0.010) and the survival curve was significantly different favouring REMP (χ2 = 6.958, P=0.008; Figure 1). With respect to dislocations only, the odds ratio in the NO REMP group relative to REMP was 3.385 (0.999-11.463; p=0.041) and the survival curve was also significantly different favouring the REMP (χ2 = 4.412, p=0.036; Figure 2).Conclusions:At medium-term follow-up, patients undergoing a Bankart repair with remplissage have a better rate of survival than those with an isolated Bankart repair.Figure 1.Survival curve for patients undergoing Bankart and remplissage or bankart only comparing time to recurrence of instability (dislocation and/or recurrent subluxation).Figure 2.Survival curve for patient undergoing Bankart and remplissage or Bankart only comparing time to dislocation.

Beach Chair Versus Lateral Decubitus Surgical Positioning for Arthroscopic Anterior Shoulder Stabilization: A Retrospective Comparison of Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Background:Surgical positioning can affect both perioperative and postoperative complication rates. It is unclear whether beach-chair versus lateral decubitus positioning affects outcomes in patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization surgery.Purpose:The purpose of this study was to compare recurrent instability, complications, and patient-reported outcomes between patients who underwent arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization in the beach-chair versus the lateral decubitus positions. It was hypothesized that recurrent instability, complications, and patient-reported outcomes would not be affected by surgical positioning.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:The authors reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent shoulder stabilization (Current Procedural Terminology codes 29806 and 29807) from 2015 to 2019. Patients were included only if anterior instability was confirmed, arthroscopic surgery was performed in response to shoulder instability, and a minimum of 2 years of follow-up data were available. Data collected for eligible patients included perioperative and postoperative complications, recurrent instability, reoperation, and revision. Patients also completed surveys for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, Oxford Shoulder Instability (OSI) score, and a return to any level of sport (RTS) questionnaire.Results:Overall, 294 patients (162 lateral decubitus and 132 beach-chair positions) were included, with an average follow-up of 2.4 ± 1.6 years. There were no significant differences in demographics between groups, nor were there differences in the rates of postoperative dislocations, subjective instability, reoperations, revisions, or complications. There was a trend toward a higher revision rate in the beach-chair group (beach-chair, 6.1% vs lateral decubitus, 1.9%; P = .069). There was no significant difference between groups regarding RTS rates or postoperative ASES, SANE, and OSI scores at 3.3 ± 1.1 years postoperatively.Conclusion:Surgical positioning for arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization did not significantly affect recurrent instability, complications, and patient-reported outcomes. Both beach-chair and lateral decubitus positioning provided good outcomes for anterior shoulder stabilization, with an overall recurrent dislocation rate of 7.8% at a mean of 3.3 years after surgery.

The Incidence of Recurrent Instability After Medial Retinacular Repair, Quadriceps Tendon Femoral Ligament Reconstruction, and the Roux Goldthwait Patellar Tendon Transfer for Patellar Instability

Background:For skeletally immature patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability, numerous soft tissue procedures have been described to stabilize the patella while protecting the physis, with varied success rates and no clear superiority of a given procedure. Cases characterized by habitual instability or severe patellofemoral dysmorphology often warrant multiple simultaneous procedures to correct both proximal and distal malalignment.Hypothesis/Purpose:To determine the incidence of recurrent instability and post-operative complications in a series of patients treated with (1) quadriceps tendon femoral ligament reconstruction (QTFLR) and medial retinacular repair (MRR), or (2) QTFLR and Roux-Goldthwait patellar tendon transfer (RG) with or without MMR; and to compare these outcomes to those for isolated MRR.Methods:Eligible participants were retrospectively identified from surgeon records based on diagnosis of patellar instability, surgical treatment with MRR, QTFLR, RG, or a combination of these procedures, and minimum follow-up of 6 months. The medical records of included participants were reviewed to collect demographic data and document post-operative complications and recurrent instability. The presence of skeletal immaturity, patella alta, trochlear dysplasia, and elevated TT-TG were determined from radiographs and MRI. Statistical analysis included independent t-tests, rank sum procedure, and Chi-square analysis for univariate analysis, and stepwise binary logistic regression analysis to determine predictors of recurrent instability and complications.Results:Seventy patients (41 females, 29 males) were included with a mean age of 16.4 years and mean follow-up of 3.5 years. The QTFLR + MRR group (n=11) had 36.3% incidence of recurrent instability (dislocation in 3, subluxation in 1) and 9.1% incidence of complications. The QTFLR + RG ± MRR group (n=13) had 23.1% incidence of recurrent instability (no dislocations, subluxation in 3) and 7.7% incidence of complications. The isolated MRR group (n=46) had a 23.9% incidence of recurrent instability (dislocation in 7, subluxation in 4) and 15.2% incidence of complications. There was a significantly higher presence of trochlear dysplasia (p<0.001) and elevated TT-TG (p=0.004) in the combination procedure group compared to the isolated MRR group. Elevated TT-TG and skeletal immaturity were significantly associated with post-operative subluxation in the isolated MRR group. No other factors were predictive of recurrent instability or post-operative complications for any groups.Conclusion:The incidence of recurrent instability after combined soft tissue procedures for patellar instability ranged from 23-36%, similar to the incidence of recurrent instability of 24% for isolated MRR despite the combined procedure group having a higher presence of trochlear dysplasia and elevated TT-TG distance.

Clinical Outcomes of Primary versus Revision Surgery using Arthroscopic Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction for Anterior Shoulder Instability. (244)

Objectives:Revision surgeries after prior shoulder stabilization are known to have worse outcomes as compared to their primary counterparts. To date, no studies have looked at the utility of arthroscopic anatomic glenoid reconstruction (AAGR) as a revision surgery. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes of primary versus revision AAGR for anterior shoulder instability with bone loss.Methods:We performed a retrospective review on consecutive patients with prospectively collected data who underwent AAGR from 2012 to 2018. Patients who received AAGR for anterior shoulder instability with bone loss and had a minimum follow-up of two years were included. Exclusion criteria included patients with rotator cuff pathology, multidirectional instability and glenoid fractures. There were 68 patients (48 primary and 20 revision) who met inclusion/exclusion criteria. Our primary outcome was measured using the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, Hand (DASH) scores. Secondary outcomes included post-operative complications and post-operative recurrent instability.Results:The primary group showed a significant improvement in most-recent post-operative WOSI from 62.7 to 20.7 (P<0.001, α=0.05) and in DASH from 26.89 to 6.7 (p<0.001, α=0.05). The revision group also showed a significant improvement in WOSI from 71.5 to 34.6 (p<0.001, α=0.05) and in DASH from 39.5 to 17.0 (p<0.05, α=0.05). When comparing between groups, the revision group had worse WOSI scores (34.6) at most recent follow-up compared to the primary group (20.7); p<0.05. The most-recent DASH scores also showed the revision group (17.0) having worse outcomes than the primary group (6.7); p<0.05. Important to note that the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was met for WOSI (MCID=10.4) but not DASH (MCID=10.83). There were no post-operative reports of instability in either group. For complications, one hardware failure (suture anchor) was seen in the primary group, and two hardware removals were seen in the revision group.Conclusions:While patient reported scores indicated worse outcomes in the revision group, the significant clinical improvement in DASH and WOSI, along with the lack of recurrent instability provides evidence that AAGR is a suitable option for revision patients.

Inconsistencies in Reporting Risk Factors for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Failure: A Systematic Review

Background: Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is a common surgical treatment for patients with recurrent patellar instability. A variety of risk factors, such as age, trochlear dysplasia, patella alta, and increased tibial tubercle–trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, have been identified and may lead to postoperative failure or poor outcomes. Purpose: While a large number of risk factors have been identified, significant heterogeneity exists in evaluating and reporting these risk factors in the literature. The goal of this study was to perform a systematic review to determine risk factors associated with worse outcomes after MPFL reconstruction and their consistency of being controlled for or analyzed among studies. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed using the MEDLINE database to identify relevant clinical outcome studies after MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellar instability. Eligible studies were evaluated for risk factors that were associated with MPFL failure, defined as recurrent instability or lack of improvement on patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores. Each study was then evaluated for inclusion of these risk factors. Results: Ten studies were included in the final analysis, comprising 1287 knees from 1275 patients who underwent isolated MPFL reconstruction. Of these 10 studies, 8 defined outcomes based on PROs and 3 defined outcomes based on postoperative recurrent instability (1 study included both outcomes). In the PRO failure group, 12 risk factors were found across all studies: trochlear dysplasia, trochlear bump height, elevated TT-TG, patellar tilt, hyperlaxity, age at first dislocation, age at surgery, body mass index, bilateral symptoms, WARPS/STAID score (weak atraumatic, risky anatomy, pain, and subluxation/strong, traumatic, anatomy normal, instability, and dislocation), femoral tunnel malposition, and femoral tunnel widening. In the recurrent instability failure group, 7 risk factors were found across all studies: trochlear dysplasia, bump height, patella alta, higher sulcus angle, higher congruence angle, preoperative J sign, and femoral tunnel malposition. Trochlear dysplasia and femoral tunnel malposition were consistently cited in several studies as risk factors for worse PROs and higher rates of recurrent instability. Patella alta was indicated as a significant risk factor for recurrent instability in 1 of 2 studies analyzing postoperative instability failures and was not associated with worse PROs in any of the studies analyzed. Similarly, elevated TT-TG distance was not a significant risk factor in any of the studies that analyzed recurrent instability as the failure endpoint. Conclusion: While various risk factors are postulated to affect outcomes after MPFL reconstruction, there remains inconsistency within the literature regarding the inclusion of all risk factors in a given analysis. Furthermore, the significance of these risk factors varies among studies in terms of whether they affect postoperative outcomes. We found that more severe trochlear dysplasia (types C and D) and femoral tunnel malposition (>10 mm from Schöttle’s point) appear to have the most consistent effect on producing higher rates of recurrent dislocation as well as worse PROs. Despite this, the role of concomitant bony procedures to adjust certain pathoanatomic risk factors in addition to MPFL reconstruction remains unknown. Future high-level studies must be conducted that respect the multifactorial nature of patellar instability and should analyze all risk factors (demographic, anatomic, and radiographic) reported to affect outcomes.

Locked anterior glenohumeral dislocation: is it always recommendable a conservative treatment?

Chronic anterior shoulder dislocation represents a rare condition, and there is still lack of consensus in its treatment. Purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcome of painful locked dislocation underwent shoulder replacement, with a minimum follow-up of two years. Second endpoint is to assess the glenoid bone graft, harvested from the humeral head. Eight patients underwent shoulder replacement for locked anterior shoulder dislocation. Four patients with a mean age of 23 y.o. were treated with Pyrocarbon-hemiarthroplasty and four patients with a mean age of 76 y.o. were treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Glenoid single stage reconstruction was performed with a bone autograft harvested from the resected humeral head. Patients were observed for a clinical and radiological follow-up for a minimum period of 2years; ASES and Constant score were assessed. Pain and ROM improvement was reported in all the patients. In one case, postoperative recurrent RSA instability was found. Glenoid reconstruction was performed in seven cases, showing a good integration and no reabsorption issues in all but one cases. ASES and Constant-Murley functional outcomes were rated as excellent by 1 patient with pyrocarbon HA and 1 patient with RSA, good by 3 patients with RSA and 2 patients with HA, fair by 1 patient with HA and poor by one patient with RSA. The treatment of locked anterior glenohumeral dislocation still represents a challenge in symptomatic patients. Shoulder replacement showed good results in young and older patients, with HA and RSA, respectively. Autograft from the humeral head is reliable for glenoid defect, even in ream and run procedure. Locked dislocation lasting more than one year, surgery is debatable for higher risk of a poor outcome and recurrent instability.

Arthroscopic Bankart repair with and without arthroscopic infraspinatus remplissage in anterior shoulder instability with a Hill-Sachs defect: a randomized controlled trial

The purpose of this study was to compare patient-reported and clinic outcomes between arthroscopic Bankart repair with (REMP) and without (NO REMP) arthroscopic infraspinatus remplissage in patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability with a Hill-Sachs lesion and minimal glenoid bone loss. Patients 14 years or older with a recurrent anterior shoulder instability with the presence of an engaging Hill-Sachs defect (of any size) confirmed on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging were eligible to participate. Consented patients were randomized intraoperatively to NO REMP or REMP. Study visits were conducted preoperatively and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. The primary outcome was the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability score. Secondary outcomes included incidence of postoperative recurrent shoulder instability, Simple Shoulder Test, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, range of motion, complications, and revision surgery. To compare groups, a mixed-effects linear model was used for continuous variables and a χ2 or Fisher's exact test for categorical data. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis assessed survival distribution between groups. One hundred and eight patients were randomized to Bankart repair with (n = 54) or without (n = 54) remplissage. The mean follow-up was 26.5 months (21-53 months) and 24.3 months (23-64 months) for the REMP and NO REMP groups, respectively. Rates of postoperative recurrent instability were higher (P = .027) in the NO REMP group with 9 of 50 (18%) vs. 2 of 52 (4%) postoperative dislocations in the REMP group. There were no significant differences in patient-reported outcomes between groups at any time point. Survival curve distributions were also significantly different favoring REMP (χ2 = 5.255, P = .022). There was a significant difference in rate of revision surgery between groups with 6 in the NO REMP and none in the REMP groups (P = .029). Post hoc, patients were noted to have a higher risk for re-dislocation if their Hill-Sachs lesion was ≥20 mm in width or ≥15% of humeral head diameter. One intraoperative complication was reported in the REMP group. There is significantly greater risk of postoperative recurrent instability in patients who did not have a remplissage performed in conjunction with an arthroscopic Bankart repair for the treatment of traumatic recurrent anterior shoulder instability with Hill-Sachs lesions of any size and minimal glenoid bone loss (<15%) at 2 years postoperatively. Otherwise, there are no differences in patient-reported outcomes, complications, or shoulder function at 2 years postoperatively. In addition, the remplissage procedure has significantly lower rates of re-dislocation in high-risk patients with Hill-Sachs lesions ≥20 mm and/or ≥15% in size.

Is generalized ligamentous laxity a contraindication for a modified Broström operation to treat chronic lateral ankle instability? A systematic review

BackgroundTo investigate whether generalized ligamentous laxity (GLL) really is a contraindication for use of the modified Broström operation to treat chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI). MethodsCase series and cohort studies of the clinical outcomes of the use of the modified Broström operation to treat patients with CLAI and GLL were systematically reviewed and a meta-analysis conducted. ResultsA total of 447 patients (458 ankles) from 2 case series and 3 cohort studies were systematically analyzed, with mean follow-up times that ranged from 12 to 108 months. Postoperative foot and ankle values analyzed included foot and ankle outcome scores, foot and ankle ability measurements, Karlsson–Peterson ankle scores, American orthopedic foot and ankle society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scores, Tegner activity level scores, anterior talar translations (ATT), talar tilt angles (TTA) and adverse events. Reliable postoperative ankle stability was achieved in CLAI patients with GLL in the 2 case series without major complications. Suture-tape augmentation combined with a modified Broström operation was employed in 1 case series, and the modified Broström operation was only performed in CLAI patients with GLL if the contralateral uninjured ankle showed normal TTA and ATT in another case series. In the 3 cohort studies, 2 reported poorer outcomes and a significantly greater failure rate in patients with GLL compared with those without GLL, and 1 reported equivalent clinical results. In the further pooled data analysis, there was a significant difference in the postoperative TTA value between the GLL and non-GLL groups (SMD: 0.885, 95% CI [0.599–1.171], P = 0.000; I2 = 98%, P = 0.000). The incidence of postoperative recurrent instability was significantly higher in the GLL group (RR: 6.265, 95% CI [2.563–15.309], P = 0.000; I2 = 0%, P = 0.985). Two studies reported the preoperative Beighton score in 7 ankles with postoperative recurrent instability, 6 of which had a preoperative Beighton score ≥7. ConclusionsGLL may not be a contraindication to the modified Broström operation being used to treat CLAI. However, some augmentation operations may be combined with the classic modified Broström operation, especially for those patients with preoperative Beighton scores ≥7, or with abnormal ATT and TTA in the contralateral ankle. This assertion should be further confirmed by a prospective, large-sample cohort and control study focused on this special population who are at a higher risk of developing postoperative instability. Level of clinical evidenceLevel 3.

Tibial Tubercle–Midepicondyle Distance Can Be a Better Index to Predict the Outcome of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Than Tibial Tubercle-Trochlear Groove Distance

PurposeTo compare the clinical utility of tibial tubercle-midepicondyle (TT-ME) and tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distances in predicting the risk for recurrent instability after isolated MPFL reconstruction.MethodsA consecutive series of patients with recurrent patellar dislocation who underwent isolated MPFL reconstruction made up the study population. The patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years. In assessment of surgical outcome, the patient was deemed to exhibit “postoperative recurrent patellar instability” when ≥1 of the following 3 conditions was identified: redislocation, positive apprehension sign, and positive J-sign (manifestation of abnormal patellar tracking). As for radiological parameters for position of the tibial tubercle, TT-ME distance (transverse distance between the tibial tubercle and midpoint of the transepicondylar line) and TT-TG distance were measured on axial computed tomography images. The clinical utility as a factor to predict the outcome of MPFL reconstruction was compared between the 2 distances using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. In addition, various radiological indices potentially influencing the surgical outcome were subjected to multivariable logistic regression analysis.ResultsWe examined 38 knees in 38 patients with a mean age at surgery of 17.6 years. Postoperative recurrent patellar instability was encountered in 8 of the 38 knees. The ROC curve analysis showed the TT-ME distance to be a significantly better indicator in predicting surgical outcome than the TT-TG distance (P = .001). The univariate analysis for radiological factors demonstrated that the TT-ME distance was significantly associated with postoperative recurrent patellar instability (odds ratio 1.42, P = .012) whereas all other factors including the TT-TG distance did not correlate with recurrent instability. The multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that only the TT-ME distance was significantly associated with recurrent instability (P = .035).ConclusionsAnalysis of our patient population undergoing isolated MPFL reconstruction showed that the TT-ME distance was a significantly better indicator than the TT-TG distance to predict the risk for recurrent instability after isolated MPFL reconstruction performed for patellar instability.Level of EvidenceLevel IV, therapeutic case series.

Postoperative Recurrence of Instability After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Shoulders With Primary Instability Compared With Recurrent Instability: Influence of Bipolar Bone Defect Size

Background: In shoulders with traumatic anterior instability, a bipolar bone defect has recently been recognized as an important indicator of the prognosis. Purpose: To investigate the influence of bipolar bone defects on postoperative recurrence after arthroscopic Bankart repair performed at primary instability. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The study group consisted of 45 patients (45 shoulders) who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair at primary instability before recurrence and were followed for at least 2 years. The control group consisted of 95 patients (95 shoulders) with recurrent instability who underwent Bankart repair and were followed for at least 2 years. Glenoid defects and Hill-Sachs lesions were classified into 5 size categories on 3-dimensional computed tomography and were allocated scores ranging from 0 for no defect to 4 for the largest defect. The shoulders were classified according to the total score for both lesions (0-8 points). The postoperative recurrence rate was investigated for each score of bipolar bone defects and was compared between patients with primary instability and patients with recurrent instability. The same analysis was performed for the age at operation (<20 years, 20-29 years, or ≥30 years) and for the presence of an off-track Hill-Sachs lesion. Results: Bipolar bone defects were smaller in shoulders with primary instability (mean ± SD defect score, 1.4 ± 1.5 points) than in those with recurrent instability (3.6 ± 1.9 points) and were larger in older patients than in younger patients at the time of primary instability. The postoperative recurrence rate was low (6.7%) in shoulders with primary instability regardless of the size of the bipolar bone defect and the patient’s age, whereas the postoperative recurrence rate was high (23.2%) in shoulders with recurrent instability, especially among patients younger than 20 years with bipolar bone defects of 2 points or greater. An off-track Hill-Sachs lesion was found in only 1 patient in the oldest age group (2.2%) at primary instability, but it was found in 19 patients (20%) at recurrent instability, including 14 patients younger than 30 years. Among patients with an off-track lesion, the postoperative recurrence rate was significantly higher in patients younger than 20 years with recurrent instability (recurrence rates: <20 years, 71.4%; 20-29 years, 14.3%; ≥30 years, 0%). Conclusion: The recurrence rate was consistently low in patients with primary instability and was significantly influenced by bipolar bone defect size and patient age in patients with recurrent instability.

Changes of Bipolar Bone Defect Size After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability: Evaluation Using a Scoring System and Influence on Postoperative Recurrence.

Background:The combination of a glenoid defect and a Hill-Sachs lesion in shoulders with traumatic anterior instability has been termed bipolar bone loss, and the preoperative size of these lesions has been reported to influence postoperative recurrence of instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair.Purpose:To investigate the influence of postoperative bipolar bone defect size on postoperative recurrence of instability.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:A total of 64 male collision/contact athletes (69 shoulders) were evaluated for a minimum of 2 years after surgery, and the pre- and postoperative sizes of both lesions (glenoid defect and Hill-Sachs) were evaluated retrospectively with 3-dimensional computed tomography. The sports played by the athletes included rugby (n = 28 shoulders), American football (n = 24 shoulders), and other collision/contact sports (n = 17 shoulders). Glenoid defects and Hill-Sachs lesions were classified into 5 size categories and assigned scores from 0 (no defect) to 4 (very large defect). Patients were then classified according to the total score (sum of the scores for both lesions). The influence of pre- and postoperative bipolar bone defect sizes on recurrence of instability was investigated by using the total scores for bipolar bone defects. The influence of postoperative glenoid morphology (normal preoperative glenoid, preoperative glenoid erosion, bone union after arthroscopic bony Bankart repair [ABBR], or nonunion after ABBR) was also investigated, as well as changes in shoulders with a preoperative off-track Hill-Sachs lesion.Results:Of 69 shoulders, 15 (21.7%) developed recurrent instability after surgery. The postoperative recurrence rate was 0% in shoulders with a total score ≤1, while the recurrence rate was consistently higher in shoulders with a total score ≥2 at both pre- and postoperative evaluation (mean, 28.8% and 32.6%, respectively). Postoperative recurrence was uncommon when there was a normal preoperative glenoid or bone union after ABBR, while it was frequent in shoulders with preoperative glenoid erosion or shoulders with nonunion after ABBR and a total score ≥2. An off-track lesion was recognized in 9 shoulders preoperatively. It was transformed to on-track lesions in 4 of the 5 shoulders showing bone union after ABBR, and there was no recurrence in the 5 shoulders with bone union. In contrast, postoperative recurrence of instability occurred in 3 of the 4 shoulders without bone union.Conclusion:Postoperative recurrence was influenced by the pre- and postoperative size of bipolar bone defects. Recurrence was uncommon if bone union was achieved after ABBR, even if there had been an off-track lesion preoperatively.