Postoperative Range Of Motion Research Articles

Latarjet procedure restores range of motion at 6 months postoperatively: a prospective cohort study using motion capture analysis

BackgroundThere is a common concern that range of motion (ROM) is negatively affected by the Latarjet procedure. We hypothesize that the Latarjet procedure results in full recuperation of ROM postoperatively and significantly improved patient reported outcome measures. MethodsPatient data were prospectively collected from a randomized controlled trial to analyze outcomes after open Latarjet procedure. Inclusion criteria involved a minimum follow-up of six months and unilateral shoulder instability. Study outcome was assessed by postoperative ROM at six months postoperatively and compared to the preoperative ROM of the ipsilateral shoulder as well as the ROM of the unaffected contralateral shoulder. All ROM measurements were performed utilizing a motion capture system to ensure consistent and reliable measurements. ResultsThe study included a total of 84 patients. ROM was measured in external rotation with the shoulder adducted (ER1), external rotation with the shoulder abducted 90 degrees (ER2), internal rotation with the arm abducted 90 degrees (IR2), and active forward elevation (AE). The average difference in ROM between the operated arm vs. the contralateral healthy arm at six months postoperatively was 3.4 degrees in ER1 (p=0.19), 4.2 degrees in ER2 (p=0.086), 2.2 degrees in IR2 (p=0.36), and 2.4 degrees in AE (p=0.045). Sub-analysis of patients with and without sling use revealed no significant difference in ROM between the operated shoulder and contralateral shoulder at six months in either group, with the exception of ER2 in the sling group. In this latter group, ROM was 71 degrees in the operated arm and 79 degrees in the contralateral arm (p=0.0094). Average preoperative pain score was 25.7 (21.4-30.1, 95%CI) vs. 13.0 postoperatively at six months (9.50-16.5, 95%CI) (p <0.00001). Average preoperative SANE instability was 42.9 (38.4-47.3, 95%CI) vs. 86.2 postoperatively at six months (83.6-88.7, 95%CI) (p <0.00001). Average preoperative Rowe score was 38.5 (34.3-42.7, 95%CI) vs. 84.3 at six postoperative months (81.1-87.4, 95%CI) (p<0.00001). ConclusionsLatarjet procedure performed for anterior instability utilizing a capsular repair result in complete ROM recovery in ER1, ER2, and IR2 at six months postoperatively, with only a slight discrepancy in active elevation. Sling use after the Latarjet procedure results in no benefit over postoperative recovery without the use of a sling. Sling use negatively affects the ROM in ER2, taking as reference the contralateral arm of the same patient, when compared to patients that did not use a sling postoperatively.

Shoulder arthroplasty in the upper extremity weight-bearing patient: a systematic review of clinical outcomes and complications

Patients who rely on their upper extremities for ambulation, or upper extremity ambulators (UEAs), place considerable stress on their shoulders through the use of assistive devices like walkers, crutches, canes, and wheelchairs. It has been postulated that UEAs may be at increased risk for complications following shoulder arthroplasty. This study aimed to systematically review the literature related to (1) patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs), (2) functional outcomes, and (3) complications in UEAs who undergo shoulder arthroplasty. A systematic review of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed to identify studies reporting clinical outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty in UEAs. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, patient-reported outcomes measures, radiographic outcomes, and postoperative range of motion were collected and compared to control patients (ie bipedal ambulators) from the constituent studies. A total of eight studies evaluating 248 UEA cases and 206 control cases were included for review. Ambulatory assistive devices utilized by UEAs included walkers (39%), wheelchairs (38%), canes (22%), and a crutch (<1%). Among UEA cases, 197 (79%) reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), 37 (15%) anatomic TSA, and 14 (6%) hemiarthroplasty were performed. Overall, patients exhibited significant improvements in mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, Constant-Murley scores, Simple Shoulder Test scores, and Visual Analog Scale scores postoperatively. Among 3 studies that included comparison with control groups of bipedal ambulators, no significant differences in outcomes were identified. The overall clinical complication rate was 17% for UEAs compared to 9.1% for controls. The rate of revision surgery was 7.7% for UEAs and 4.9% for bipedal ambulators. UEAs experience satisfactory pain relief, functional improvements, and good subjective outcomes following shoulder arthroplasty. However, complication and revision rates are higher compared to those for bipedal ambulators, and the majority of UEAs undergo reverse shoulder arthroplasty compared to anatomic TSA.

Staged bilateral total shoulder arthroplasty: a single institutional experience with mid-term follow-up

BackgroundThe preferred surgical approach for surgical treatment of advanced glenohumeral arthritis is shoulder arthroplasty (SA). Considering the growing volume and success of SA, patients with bilateral shoulder disease are likely to undergo surgery on both shoulders. There are numerous studies evaluating the outcomes of bilateral hip and knee arthroplasty, but a paucity of information examining bilateral SA. This study intends to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing staged bilateral anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). MethodsInstitutional records were queried for patients who underwent staged bilateral aTSA or rTSA from 2009 to 2020. Patient records were retrospectively reviewed to assess preoperative and postoperative range of motion (ROM) and strength measurements, demographic information, and complications. Mean ± standard deviation was reported for all continuous variables. Mean functional measurements were compared using a 2-Sample t-Test, ordinal variables via Wilcoxon-Mann Whitney test, and categorical variables via Chi-squared test. Patients were included in the outcome analysis if they had a bilateral TSA with the same procedure (i.e. aTSA on both sides, or rTSA on both sides). Results43 patients (15 male, 28 female) were included. There was an average time of 1.8 years between surgeries. Of the 43 patients, 26 patients had staged bilateral aTSAs and 14 had staged bilateral rTSAs with three patients who had different surgeries on each shoulder. The three patients with different surgeries on each shoulder were excluded from outcome analysis. Patients who had staged aTSA operations demonstrated significant improvement in external rotation (P = .0191, P < .001), forward elevation (FE) (P = .0004, P < .001), and internal rotation (IR) (P = .0183, P = .0166) after the first and second surgeries. Staged rTSA patients showed significant improvement in FE after the first (P = .0043) and second surgeries (P = .016). Patients demonstrated significant increase in strength of external rotation (P = .0136), FE (P = .0088), and IR (P = .0206) after the first rTSA. There was no corresponding increase in strength testing after the second bilateral rTSA surgery. The average Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Contralateral Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and Simple Shoulder Test scores for all surgeries were 84 ± 10, 83 ± 13, 75 ± 20, and 9 ± 2, respectively for the first surgery and 82 ± 13, 83 ± 13, 71 ± 21, and 8 ± 3 for the second surgery. ConclusionIndividuals that undergo staged aTSA procedures gain a better ROM and IR strength after both operations. However, individuals that undergo staged rTSA procedures have an improved ROM and strength after the first surgery but limited improvement after the second.

Distalization and lateralization shoulder angles: do they have a role in predicting postoperative clinical outcomes?

BackgroundLateralization Shoulder Angle (LSA) and Distalization Shoulder Angle (DSA) have been proposed to estimate the appropriateness of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) positioning. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of DSA and LSA over clinical outcomes in a group of patients treated by the same surgeon with the same clinical and radiographic follow-up. MethodsA retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of RSAs performed between 2017 and 2021 was carried out. Inclusion criteria were primary RSA as a treatment for Cuff Tear Arthropathy, Massive Irreparable rotator cuff tear, Osteoarthritis or Rheumatoid arthritis, a true anteroposterior radiograph of the affected shoulder in neutral rotation at final follow-up, a minimum follow-up of 12 months, radiograph used to measure the angles, and clinical evaluation with the same follow-up. Outcome measures were shoulder range of motion (ROM), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and Constant-Murley score (CS). ResultsA total of 83 patients were included in the study. Patients achieved on average, 130 ± 14.14° of flexion, 97.5 ± 17.67° of abduction, 62.5 ± 3.53° and 72.5 ± 10.60° of external rotation, respectively, at 0° and 90° of abduction, and 5.13° of internal rotation. The mean VAS and CS were, respectively, 2.5 ± 3.5 mm and 69 ± 2.82 points at last follow-up. The mean DSA and LSA were 45 ± 2.72 and 92.99 ± 9.17, respectively. Neither the linear nor the quadratic regression fit for DSA or LSA revealed relevant associations with any of individual ROM measures, except for the quadratic fit correlating LSA and forward flexion (beta = 0.029, P = .027). Linear fit showed a low reverse, but significant, association between DSA and VAS (beta = −0.56, P = .036) and an association of LSA with both CS (beta = −0.344, P = .009) and VAS (beta = 0.091, P = .01). Quadratic models showed higher R squared for all associations, but correlation was significant only between VAS and LSA (beta = 0.006, P = .011) ConclusionWe present the first evaluation of the predictive value of both DSA and LSA in a group of patients treated by the same surgeon with the same clinical and radiographic follow-up. DSA and LSA play only a marginal to no role in the prediction of RSA postoperative ROM and might have a role in predicting VAS and CS.

Increased knee joint circumference after total knee arthroplasty, should we care?

BACKGROUND: Knee swelling is common after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there is limited literature on its clinical implications. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to determine whether a correlation exists between increased postoperative knee circumference, pain, functional score and range of motion. METHOD: Between November 2019 and June 2020, 114 patients were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Primary endpoints included the correlation between knee circumference change (KCC, and 1) postoperative pain 2) Oxford Knee Score, and 3) postoperative range of motion. These data were collected on day 2 and at 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean knee circumference (KC) increase on postoperative day 2 was 9.27%. No statistically significant correlation was found between KCC and pain (p = 0.853), KCC and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) consumption (p = 0.265), KCC and knee flexion (p = 0.729) and extension (p = 0.157). At 6 months postoperatively, no statistically significant correlation was found between KCC and pain (p = 0.909), and Oxford Knee score (p = 0.137). However a statistically significant correlation was observed between increased KC of more than 10% and extension deficit at 6 month postoperatively (p = 0.012), as well as between KCC on day 2- and at 6 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: After TKA the average increase in KC is around 10%. Increased postoperative knee effusion is neither an indicator for increased pain nor for unfavorable functional scores. At 6 months postoperatively, a correlation exists between increased KC and extension deficit for knees with more than 10% KCC. This study addresses common patient inquiries to physiotherapists regarding knee swelling following TKA.

Dorsal calcaneal wedge removal in zadek osteotomy: A cadaveric study

BackgroundInsertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT) is a common pathology with multiple surgical interventions available for treatment. The Zadek, dorsal closing wedge calcaneal osteotomy (ZO) has been demonstrated to be effective treatment of IAT. There have been various recommendations in the literature as to what measurement of wedge removal should be considered ideal to produce greatest postoperative range of motion (ROM), thus postoperative biomechanical potential. Accordingly, the purpose of this cadaveric study was to assess the range of motion achieved after various measurements of wedge removal by ZO. MethodsThe ZO was performed on six cadaveric specimens. A 7.5 mm and 15 mm wedge osteotomy was marked and sequentially completed on each specimen. Lateral fluoroscopic imaging was utilized to take preoperative and postoperative ROM measurements for each osteotomy. Dorsiflexion (DF) and plantarflexion (PF) ROM arcs were measured for each wedge size and compared by t-test. Effect sizes were calculated by Cohen’s d analysis. ResultsMaximal DF was 110.87 ± 12.97 deg in the pre-osteotomy state. Removal of a 7.5 mm wedge improved DF by 8 deg to a mean 102.93 ± 13.81 deg (p = 0.08). Removal of a 15 mm wedge improved DF by 16 deg to a mean 95.96 ± 11.41 deg (p = 0.003). Cohen’s d and effect size calculation demonstrated a 7.5 mm wedge to have a small effect on DF, while a 15 mm wedge had a medium effect (0.29, 0.52 respectively). Maximal PF did not change significantly amongst the pre-osteotomy, 7.5 mm wedge, or 15 mm wedge positions. ICC was 0.96. ConclusionBased on the results presented in this study, removal of a 15 mm wedge with ZO yields significant and greater improvement in ROM than a 7.5 mm wedge. We hope the current study will better inform preoperative planning for ZO. Study typeProspective Cadaver Study. Level of evidenceV.

Outcomes following revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty for infection

BackgroundIn comparison to primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) procedures, revision arthroplasty can be a longer and more complex procedure leading to an increased risk of complications. The reported rates of infection in primary RSA range from 1% to 19% and the cost impact on patients and healthcare systems is significant, leading to multiple revision surgeries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the postoperative outcomes, complications, and revision rates for revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rRSA) due to infection compared to rRSA for non-infectious causes. MethodsPatients who underwent rRSA between 2009 and 2020 by a single fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeon at a single institution were retrospectively identified through a prospectively collected database. Patients were separated into two cohorts based on revision diagnosis: (1) rRSA due to infection (rRSAi), and (2) rRSA due to non-infectious causes (rRSAn). Patient-reported outcome scores (PROs), including the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Shoulder Arthroplasty Smart score (SAS), and active range of motion (ROM) were collected preoperatively and at a minimum one year follow-up. Postoperative complications and revision rates were also collected. ResultsA total of 93 patients (n=19 rRSAi group, n=74 rRSAn group) with a mean age of 68 years were included in this analysis. All baseline demographics were comparable between groups. No significant differences were found in preoperative or postoperative PROs and ROM between the two groups. Postoperative complication rates and revision rates were comparable between the groups. ConclusionRevision reverse shoulder arthroplasty due to infection results in similar patient-reported outcome scores, range of motion, and revision rates when compared to rRSA for non-infectious causes. Our results suggest that despite the unique challenges associated with rRSA for infection, patient outcomes do not differ from cases attributed to non-infectious causes. Further efforts are warranted to further validate and contextualize these findings, considering the protentional influence of patient-specific and implant-specific factors.

Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Versus Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Primary Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis With Intact Rotator Cuffs: A Meta-Analyses.

Traditional practice favors total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) for the treatment of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (PGHO) with an intact rotator cuff; however, the indications for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have expanded to include PGHO. The purpose of this systematic review is to compare the mean differences in the range of motion and patient-reported outcomes between the TSA and RSA with an intact rotator cuff and to analyze the subgroup of the Walch type B2 glenoid. This IRB-exempt, PROSPERO-registered systematic review strictly followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. A literature search of five databases revealed 493 articles, of which 10 were included for quantitative synthesis. Level III evidence studies with the diagnosis of PGHO and ≥2 years of follow-up were included. Studies without preoperative and postoperative data were excluded. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to evaluate the methodologic quality of the included studies. Preoperative and postoperative range of motion and patient-reported outcomes were collected. The random-effects model was employed, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. There were a total of 544 and 329 studies in the TSA group and RSA group, respectively. The mean age in the TSA group and RSA groups were 65.36 ± 7.06 and 73.12 ± 2.40, respectively (p = 0.008). The percentages of males in the TSA and RSA groups were 73.2% and 51.1%, respectively (p = 0.02). The mean differences in forward elevation, external rotation in adduction, internal rotation scale, visual analog scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and Single AssessmentNumericEvaluation (SANE) scores were improved for both groups with no significant differences between the two. There were 9.6 times the revisions in the TSA group (8.8% vs. 0.91%; p = 0.014) and 1.5 times the complications in the TSA group (3.68% vs. 2.4%; p = 0.0096). Two hundred and forty-two glenoids were identified as Walch type B2 (126 in the TSA groupand 116 in the RSA group). The mean ages in the B2 subgroup were 68.20 ± 3.25 and 73.03 ± 1.49 for the TSA and RSA, respectively (p = 0.25). The percentages of males in the B2 subgroup were 74.6% and 46.5% for the TSA and RSA groups, respectively (p = 0.0003). The ASES, SANE, forward elevation, and external rotation in the adduction results were descriptively summarized for this subgroup, with average mean differences of 49.0 and 51.2, 45.7 and 66.1, 77.6° and 58.6°, and 38.6° and 34.1° for the TSA and RSA groups, respectively. In the setting of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff, the RSA has a similar range of motion and clinical outcomesbut lower complication and revision rates as compared to the TSA. This may hold true in the setting of the B2 glenoid, although a high-powered study on this subgroup is required. Anatomic shoulder arthroplasty maintains an important role in select patients. Further studies are required to better elucidate the role of glenoid bone loss and posterior humeral head subluxation with regard to implant choice.

Comparison of Alignment Accuracy and Clinical Outcomes between a CT-Based, Saw Cutting Robotic System and a CT-Free, Jig-guided Robotic System for Total Knee Arthroplasty.

The different cutting mode of robot-assisted TKAs may influence the accuracy of alignment. The purpose of this study was to compare alignment accuracy and early clinical outcomes between a CT-based, saw cutting robotic system (MAKO) and a CT-free, jig-guided robotic system (ROSA) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A total of 20 MAKO TKAs and 20 ROSA TKAs from June 2021 to June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Differences in the postoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), posterior tibial slope (PTS) and 3° outlier frequency of the HKA, LDFA, MPTA and PTS were studied at 3 months and 1 year of follow-up. The operative time and total blood loss (TBL) were compared between these two groups. Clinical outcomes at 1 year after surgery, including range of motion (ROM), Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, and Knee Society Score-2011 (KSS-2011), were also compared between these two groups. The baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable. There were no significant differences in the mean deviations of postoperative HKA, LDFA, MPTA or PTS between the two groups at 3 months or 1 year (all ps > 0.05). Moreover, there was no significant difference in the percentage of 3° outliers for HKA, LDFA, MPTA, or PTS between the two groups at 3-month or 1-year follow-up (all ps > 0.05). The mean operation time of MAKO was longer than that of ROSA (112.7 ± 12.8 min vs 94.8 ± 23.0 min, p = 0.001), but the mean TBL (1356.7 ± 648.5 mL vs 1384.5 ± 676.3 mL) and transfusion rate (15.0% vs 5.0%) were not significantly different between the two groups (all ps > 0.05). No significant differences were found in postoperative ROM, WOMAC score or KSS score at 1 year (all ps > 0.05). The MAKO and ROSA had similar accuracy and precision in TKA alignment. The clinical outcomes at 1 year after surgery were also comparable.

OPEN REDUCTION AND INTERNAL FIXATION WITH PLATING VERSUS EXTERNAL FIXATOR IN DISTAL END RADIUS FRACTURES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to compare the external fixation and locking plate fixation of intraarticular fractures of the distal radius in terms of functional outcome and complications. The study aims to assess the patients for fracture union, wrist range of motion (ROM), grip strength, pain, and activity among the locking plate and external fixator group. Methods: This study aimed to compare distal end radius external fixator to distal end radius plating regarding functional outcomes. This is an observational type of study where 40 patients were included in the study, among them, 20 were treated with external fixator/k wire and 20 with distal radius plate. The study was conducted in a tertiary care institute during the study period. Results: The most patients were males &gt;50 years of age, with injury caused by a fall on an outstretched hand. In the present study, we got excellent functional results according to the G and O’Brien system in 11 (55%) of patients treated with the plating group, good results in 5 (25%), fair results in 4 (20%), and poor (0%) in the plating. Conclusion: Plating provides better functional outcomes, as assessed by Green and O’Brien’s score, as compared to external fixation. It allows for an early post-operative ROM exercises compared to an external fixator and better anatomical positioning of the fracture segments.

Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: Differing Results Comparing the First and Second Knees

BackgroundPatients often prefer one knee over the other following staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty (BTKA). Our study compared patient-reported outcomes scores of each knee following BTKA and identified factors that may contribute to the identified discrepancies. MethodsAll patients who underwent staged BTKA between July 2014 and August 2022 were identified. The patient-reported outcomes were collected preoperatively and at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Each knee’s results were compared using paired t-tests and McNemar tests. Preoperative Kellgren-Lawrence Grade (KLG), postoperative range of motion (ROM), reoperation rates, and manipulations under anesthesia (MUAs) were collected. Results were stratified based on time between TKAs (< 3 months, 3 to 12 months, 1 to 2 years, and > 2 years). ResultsThere were 911 patients who underwent staged BTKA, with a mean 4.1-year follow-up. The ROM, patient satisfaction, MUAs, and reoperations were not significantly different between knees. Comparing the KLG of the first and second knees, 71% had the same KLG for both knees, 21% had a lower KLG, and 7% of the second knees had a higher KLG. The first knee had greater pain reduction (−10.6 at 2 weeks, −27.4 at 6 weeks) compared to the second (9.3 at 2 weeks, −8.1 at 6 weeks) (P < .0001) and better improvement in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR) score (8.5 at 2 weeks, 16.9 at 6 weeks) compared to the second (−5.8 at 2 weeks, 5.0 at 6 weeks) (P < .0001). The 1-year outcomes between first and second knees, or recovery curves, were not different when stratifying by time between TKAs. ConclusionsThe second knee in a staged BTKA has less delta improvement in KOOS JR and pain scores at early follow-up, likely due to higher starting KOOS JR and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scores, despite similar final patient satisfaction and clinical outcome measures. Lower KLG in the second total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may contribute to these findings. An MUA after the first TKA is highly predictive of an MUA after the second TKA.

Glenosphere Size Does Not Matter in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Objective There are few studies to date reporting on outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with cohorts stratified by glenosphere size. The purpose of this study is to investigate the role that glenosphere size has on postoperative outcomes. Methods Patients who underwent reverse TSA between 1987 with minimum of 2.0 years of follow-up were included. Patients were stratified into two cohorts based on glenosphere size of 36mm or 40mm. Patients' range of motion, patient-reported outcomes, and radiographic variables (glenoid preoperative morphology, scapular notching, humeral loosening) were evaluated. Results All measurements of range of motion measurements with the exception of internal rotation saw significant preoperative to postoperative improvements within each cohort. There were no significant differences in postoperative range of motion, ASES, or VAS pain scores across the two cohorts. Overall, forward elevation improved to 134° ± 16° in the 36mm cohort and 133° ± 14° in the 40mm cohort ( p = 0.47). External rotation improved to 37° ± 13° for 36mm patients and 35° ± 19° for 40mm patients ( p = 0.58). In the 36mm group, internal rotation increased by 1.3 vertebral levels and 2.3 vertebral levels in the 40mm cohort. At final follow-up, the 36mm cohort had a VAS score of 2 ± 2, ASES score of 66 ± 19, and SST score of 6 ± 3. Similarly, the 40mm cohort had a VAS score of 2 ± 3, ASES score of 77 ± 28, and SST score of 9 ± 3. Conclusions Reverse TSA provides sustained improvements in range of motion and shoulder function irrespective of glenosphere size. Level of Evidence III.

Proximal Row Carpectomy with and without Capitate Resurfacing: A Preliminary Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

In wrist salvage, proximal row carpectomy (PRC) has increasingly shown superior outcomes to four-corner fusion (4CF). Furthermore, PRC with resurfacing capitate pyrocarbon implants (PRC + RCPIs) provides a treatment option that may allow patients to avoid 4CF or wrist arthrodesis and help restore natural joint function and distribute loads evenly across the implant, though RCPI has yet to be evaluated on a large scale. We aimed to compare outcomes between PRC and PRC + RCPI for the treatment of scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) wrists. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane were queried for articles on PRC and PRC + RCPI performed for SLAC and SNAC wrist with minimum 12-month follow-up. Primary outcomes included wrist range of motion (ROM), grip strength, and outcome scores including Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and QuickDASH scores, Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation (PRWHE), and visual analog scale pain scores. Twenty-two studies reporting on 1,804 wrists were included (1,718 PRC alone, 86 PRC + RCPI). PRC + RCPI was associated with greater postoperative radial deviation, but poorer flexion. PRC + RCPI also had significantly lower postoperative QuickDASH (less disability and symptoms) and postoperative PRWHE (lower pain and disability) scores and an improvement in PRWHE compared with PRC. There was no significant difference in grip strength. PRC + RCPI demonstrated similar postoperative ROM to PRC alone. While PRC + RCPI was associated with more favorable outcome scores, further research is needed to confirm these findings and assess the incidence and profile of complications related to RCPIs. Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Arthroscopically Assisted Coracoclavicular (CC) Stabilization Using a Suture Button Device for Lateral Clavicle Fractures with CC Ligament Injury.

Background: Lateral clavicle fractures represent approximately 10-15% of all clavicle fractures. However, controversy exists regarding the optimal surgical treatment because of instability associated with the coracoclavicular (CC) ligament injury and a small lateral fragment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiological and clinical outcomes of arthroscopically assisted CC stabilization using a suture button device for lateral clavicle fractures accompanied by CC ligament injury. Methods: A retrospective observational study involved six patients with modified Neer type IIB fractures, which were treated with the technique and followed for 12 months. Postoperative range of motion (ROM) and X-rays were evaluated every 3 months. Shoulder functional scores (University of California Los Angeles score, Japanese Orthopedics Association score) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain (at rest, at night, and during motion) and for satisfaction were analyzed 12 months after surgery. Results: Early phase ROM recovery and excellent outcomes were achieved. All patients achieved bone union. Slight superior clavicle displacement and bone hole dilation occurred with no critical complications. Conclusions: Arthroscopically assisted CC stabilization with a suture button device for unstable lateral clavicle fractures can produce satisfactory radiological and clinical results.

Discrepancies Between Intraoperative and Postoperative Ankle Motion Measured for Anterior-Approach Total Ankle Arthroplasty.

Although intraoperative ankle motion serves as a foundational reference for anticipated motion after surgery and guides the addition of procedures to enhance ankle motion in total ankle arthroplasty (TAA), the relationship between intraoperative and postoperative ankle motion remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the discrepancy between intraoperative and postoperative ankle range of motion (ROM) following TAAs using the anterior-approach, fixed-bearing systems. This study retrospectively reviewed 67 patients (67 ankles) who underwent primary TAA at a single institution. Three different types of anterior-approach, fixed-bearing TAA systems were included. Intraoperative fluoroscopy was used to document the maximal dorsiflexion and plantar flexion at the end of the case. Standardized weightbearing maximum dorsiflexion and plantar flexion sagittal radiographs were obtained pre- and postoperatively, following a previously described method. The motion between 3 different time points (preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative [mean 11.4 months]) was compared using pairwise t tests, and their differences were quantified. The mean total tibiotalar ROM was 38.1 degrees (SD 7.8) intraoperatively, and the postoperative total tibiotalar ROM was 24.2 degrees (SD 9.7) (P < .001), indicating that a mean of 65.3% (SD 26.7) of the intraoperative motion was maintained postoperatively. Intraoperative dorsiflexion (mean 11.6 [SD 4.5] degrees) showed no evidence of difference from postoperative dorsiflexion (mean 11.4 [SD 5.8] degrees, P > .99), indicating that a median of 95.6% (interquartile range: 66.2-112) of the intraoperative maximum dorsiflexion was maintained postoperatively. However, there was a significant difference between intraoperative plantarflexion (mean 26.4 [SD 6.3]) and postoperative plantarflexion (12.8 [SD 6.9] degrees, P < .001), indicating a mean 50.6% (SD 29.6) of intraoperative motion maintained in the postoperative assessment. There was an improvement of 2.5 degrees in the total tibiotalar ROM following TAA with statistical significance (P < .043). This study revealed a significant difference between intraoperative ankle ROM and ankle ROM approximately 1 year after anterior-approach, fixed-bearing TAA, mainly due to plantarflexion motion restriction. Minimal difference in dorsiflexion suggests the importance of achieving the desired postoperative dorsiflexion motion during the surgery using the best possible adjunct procedures. Level IV, case series.

A Modified Arthroscopic Triple-row Repair Technique for L-shaped Delaminated Rotator Cuff Tears.

To compare the clinical outcomes of a modified arthroscopic triple-row (TR) repair technique with the suture bridge (SB) repair technique in treating L-shaped delaminated rotator cuff tears. Various surgical techniques for L-shaped delaminated rotator cuff tears have been reported, many of which aid in increasing the contact area and pressure of the rotator cuff. However, there is still debate over which technique yields superior results. From January 2017 to March 2020, 61 cases of L-shaped delaminated rotator cuff tears were included in this study. Of these, 34 cases underwent the modified arthroscopic triple-row repair technique, while 27 cases were addressed with the suture bridge repair technique. Functional assessment was conducted using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score, the Constant score (CS), and the visual analogue scale (VAS) score. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) assessments for rotator cuff healing were performed at the 24-month postoperative mark. Statistical evaluations were conducted using SPSS for Windows (Version 25.0, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA), employing the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to compare preoperative and postoperative data and ROM differences, and the Mann-Whitney U test for statistical differences in clinical outcome scores between the two groups. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Comparative analysis of the preoperative and final follow-up scores revealed a substantial enhancement in shoulder function, as indicated by the ASES, UCLA, CS, and VAS scores, with statistical significance (p < 0.001). At both the preoperative stage and final follow-up, no notable differences were observed in ASES, UCLA, CS, and VAS scores between the two groups. However, the TR repair group exhibited lower VAS scores than the SB group at 1 and 3 months postoperatively. Active range of motion (ROM) showed significant improvement in both groups. No significant differences in ROM were noted between the two groups either before the surgery or at the final follow-up. The study demonstrates that both the modified arthroscopic TR and SB techniques for L-shaped delaminated cuff tears yield satisfactory outcomes, with no significant differences in overall clinical performance. Notably, early postoperative pain management appears more effective with the modified TR technique, suggesting its potential for enhanced early recovery experiences. This technique's design, promoting securer fixation and optimal contact conditions, is implied to facilitate superior long-term healing, warranting further investigation into its long-term benefits.

Medial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With Autograft Versus Allograft: A Systematic Review

Background: Medial collateral ligament (MCL) reconstruction (MCLR) is performed after failed nonoperative treatment or high-grade MCL injury with associated valgus instability. Purpose: To evaluate clinical outcomes after MCLR with autograft versus allograft. Study Design: Systematic review, Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The authors conducted a search of the PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases to identify studies comparing outcomes of MCLR with autograft versus allograft. Studies were included if they evaluated clinical outcomes after MCLR using autograft and/or allograft. Any study that included concomitant knee ligament injury other than the anterior cruciate ligament injury was excluded. A quality assessment was performed using the modified Coleman Methodology Score. Results: The initial search identified 746 studies, 17 of which met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. The studies included 307 patients: 151 (49.2%) patients received autografts, and 156 (50.8%) received allografts. The most used autograft was the semitendinosus tendon (136 grafts; 90.1% of specified allografts), and the only allograft used was the Achilles tendon (110 grafts; 100% of specified autografts). The mean follow-up of the studies was 25.6 months. Postoperative pain (Lysholm scores) ranged from 82.9 to 94.8 in patients receiving autografts and 87.5 to 93 in patients receiving allografts. Postoperative range of motion was full in 8 of 15 (53.3%) patients receiving autografts compared with 82 of 93 (88.2%) patients receiving allografts. Five of the 151 (3.3%) patients who had MCLR with autografts had complications such as infection, instability, and prominent screws. Two of the 156 (1.3%) MCLRs with allografts developed complications of prominent screws and nonhealing incisions. Conclusion: MCLR with either autografts or allografts leads to improved patient-reported, radiographic, and clinical outcomes. Patient-reported postoperative pain was similar in patients receiving either graft type. Other outcomes were difficult to compare between graft types because of nonstandardized reporting and a lack of pre- and postoperative measurements. Therefore, there is no evidence of significantly improved outcomes in the use of either autograft or allograft with MCLR.

Early Results in Total Replacement of the Distal Radioulnar Joint.

Pathology of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) including instability and arthritis presents a challenge for hand and upper extremity surgeons. Surgical options include a Darrach procedure and similar resections, soft tissue interposition arthroplasty, and a one-bone forearm. In 2005, a prosthesis for DRUJ arthroplasty was approved for use in the United States. The authors hypothesize that DRUJ arthroplasty will lead to improved pain and range of motion (ROM) with a moderate, but manageable, complication rate. A retrospective review of 46 patients who underwent DRUJ arthroplasty by a single private group of hand surgeons was performed. Demographics, complications, postoperative visual analog scale (VAS), and postoperative ROM were obtained and analyzed. The patients were followed up for a mean of 60 weeks. The implant was used both as primary surgical treatment for DRUJ pathology and as salvage for previous failed procedures. Twenty-two percent of patients experienced complications: 15% required revision surgery. No patients were converted to another type of implant, including those who underwent revision surgery. Prominent hardware was the most common indication requiring revision. Patients achieved an improvement in supination of 17° and extension of 5°. They additionally achieved a decrease in average VAS score from 7.1 to 2.3. Distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty reduces pain and improves ROM in patients with DRUJ pathology with a 22% complication rate. This cohort demonstrates improved pain, modest improvement in ROM, but a 22% complication rate for this implant. Further long-term studies are encouraged.

Effect of duration of preoperative pain on outcomes of total temporomandibular joint replacement

The purpose of the study was to determine whether the duration of preoperative pain affects outcomes of temporomandibular joint replacement (TMJR). Twenty-seven patients who underwent primary TMJR between 1 July 2020 and 31 October 2022 were retrospectively assessed for duration of preoperative pain, level of preoperative and postoperative pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS; 0, none; 10, severe), preoperative and postoperative range of motion (ROM), and net change in quality of life (much better, better, same, worse, much worse), reporting the longest available follow up for each patient. Surgical success was defined as postoperative pain of ≤4 and postoperative ROM of ≥30 mm, or net change (Δ) in ROM of ≥10 mm. Regression analyses evaluated associations between independent variables and postoperative pain and ROM. At a mean follow-up of 17.8 (SD: 6.8, range 3-32) months , pain (5.1, SD: 2.2, p < 0.001) and ROM (9.3 mm, SD: 8.0, p<0.001) significantly improved. Quality of life was much better in 16 patients, better in eight, the same in one, and worse in two. Longer duration of preoperative pain tended to be negatively associated with postoperative ROM (β = −0.27; 95% CI −0.6 to 0.0; p = 0.078) but was not associated with severity of postoperative pain. Surgical success was achieved in 23/27 patients. The successful group tended to have lower pain on VAS preoperatively (5.9, SD: 1.9) vs 7.5, SD: 1.3) and postoperatively (0.4, SD: 0.8 vs 4.8, SD: 2.6), and greater improvement in quality of life (much better: 14/23 vs 2/4). In conclusion, longer duration of preoperative pain tended to be associated with worse postoperative ROM following TMJR. Higher preoperative pain may be a predictor for unsuccessful surgery.

Kickstand Technique for Treatment of Valgus-Impacted Proximal Humerus Fractures

Purpose: Describe a new technique using a minimally invasive surgical intervention for the treatment of valgus-impacted proximal humerus fractures. The Kickstand technique is a novel approach that offers reliable fixation and union without the need for additional hardware. Materials and Methods: A retrospective case series of 3 patients with valgus-impacted proximal humerus fractures was treated with this Kickstand technique using an intramedullary fibular allograft. Postoperative x-rays and outcomes are presented. Results: The Kickstand technique was used to address valgus-impacted fractures in 3 patients. Postoperative range of motion and shoulder outcome scores were reported at 2 years for patients A and B, and at 1 year for patient C (Active range of motion external rotation: 28 degrees; Active range of motion elevation: 140 degrees; Simple Shoulder Test-12: 11; American Shoulder and Elbow Standardized Shoulder Assessment: 78). Postoperative Grashey and lateral x-rays for each patient show union of the valgus-impacted humerus. Conclusions: The Kickstand technique using intramedullary fibular allograft is an alternative fixation technique for displaced valgus proximal humerus fracture. It has the advantage of avoiding additional metallic hardware and allowing early motion but requires the use of intramedullary fibular allograft which can interfere with future use of stemmed humeral prosthesis.