Postoperative Radiotherapy Group Research Articles

Propensity-matched study on locally advanced esophageal cancer: surgery versus post-operative radiotherapy

BackgroundThis study aims to delineate the long-term outcomes and recurrence patterns of locally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) patients managed with or without postoperative radiotherapy (PORT).MethodsA retrospective cohort from two academic centers, encompassing patients who initially underwent esophagectomy and were pathologically staged T3-4, was analyzed. Survival outcomes were constructed using Kaplan–Meier method, with survival significance was evaluated using the log-rank test. Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to balance potential selection bias.ResultsAmong the 506 patients, 251 underwent surgery alone and 255 received radiotherapy following radical surgery. With a median follow-up of 49.1 months, PORT significantly improved 5-year overall survival (53.8% vs. 25.3%; p < 0.001) and 5-year disease-free survival rates (45.3% vs. 8.5%; p < 0.001) compared to surgery alone. These differences in survival outcomes persisted even after PSM (p < 0.001 for both). Treatment failure was significantly less frequent in the PORT group (46.7%) compared to the surgery-only group (90.0%; p < 0.001), with corresponding reductions in locoregional recurrence (9.4% vs. 54.1%; p < 0.001). This underscores the significant association between PORT and disease control.ConclusionThe absence of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy highlights the importance of PORT in improving survival and reducing recurrence in advanced T3-4 TESCC patients. This study underscores the importance of PORT as a salvage treatment for locally advanced TESCC patients without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Survival benefits of postoperative radiotherapy in patients with cT1 − 2N1M0 breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a SEER-based population study

BackgroundWhether patients with cT1 − 2N1M0 breast cancer can benefit from postoperative radiotherapy (RT) after receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been controversial. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore whether postoperative RT can benefit this group of patients in terms of survival.MethodsWe used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data to conduct a retrospective review of women with cT1 − 2N1M0 breast cancer diagnosed between 20 and 80 years of age who received NAC between 2010 and 2015. Our study compared the impact of postoperative RT on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in breast cancer patients using propensity score matching (PSM) and performed subgroup analysis.ResultsThis study finally included 1092 cT1 − 2N1M0 breast cancer patients. Regardless of the patient’s PSM status, postoperative RT was significantly associated with OS of cT1-2N1M0 breast cancer patients who received NAC. Specifically, the 10-year OS rate was 78.7% before PSM matching, compared with 71.1% in patients who did not receive postoperative RT, and the difference was more significant after PSM matching, which was 83.1% and 71.1% respectively. However, postoperative RT did not significantly benefit CSS in patients with cT1 − 2N1M0 breast cancer who received NAC. The 10-year CSS rate was 81.4% VS 76.2% (P = 0.085) before PSM matching and 85.8% VS 76.2%(P = 0.076) after matching. Due to the intersection of OS and CSS curves, this restricted mean survival time (RMST) method was chosen as a supplement. After 60 months, the OS difference in RMST between the postoperative RT group and the non-radiotherapy (noRT) group was 7.37 months (95%CI: 0.54–14.21; P = 0.034), and the CSS difference was 5.18 months (95%CI: -1.31-11.68; P = 0.118). Subgroup analysis found that in patients with right-sided breast cancer, postoperative RT improved the patient’s OS (HR = 0.45, 95%CI: 0.21–0.95, P = 0.037) and CSS (HR = 0.42, 95%CI: 0.18–0.98, P = 0.045).ConclusionsOur results showed that additional postoperative RT improved the OS of cT1 − 2N1M0 breast cancer patients who received NAC, but failed to improve their CSS. It is worth noting that in the subgroup analysis of patients with right-sided breast cancer, we observed significant improvements in OS and CSS. And further prospective studies are still needed to verify the effect of postoperative RT in different subgroups.

Obstacles to receiving postoperative radiation therapy following separation surgery for metastatic spine disease.

Obtaining timely postoperative radiotherapy (RT) following separation surgery is critical to avoid local recurrence of disease yet can be a challenge due to scheduling conflicts, insurance denials, and travel arrangements. In patients undergoing metastatic spine surgery for spinal cord compression, the authors sought to: 1) report the rate of postoperative RT, 2) describe reasons for patients not receiving postoperative RT, and 3) investigate factors that may predict whether a patient receives postoperative RT. A single-center retrospective case series was undertaken of all patients who underwent metastatic spine surgery for extradural disease between January 2010 and January 2021. Inclusion criteria were patients with intermediate or radioresistant tumors with evidence of spinal cord compression who underwent surgery. The primary outcome was the occurrence of RT within 3 months following surgery. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed controlling for age, BMI, race, total number of decompressed levels, tumor size, other organ metastasis, and preoperative RT or chemotherapy to predict patients receiving postoperative RT. Of 239 patients undergoing spine surgery for metastatic disease, 113 (47.3%) received postoperative RT while 126 (52.7%) did not. In the postoperative RT group, 24 (21.2%) received stereotactic body radiation therapy while 89 (78.8%) received conventional external-beam radiation therapy. The most common reasons for patients not receiving postoperative RT included death or transfer to hospice (31.0%), RT not being recommended by radiation oncology (30.2%), and loss to follow-up (23.8%). On critical review with the radiation oncology department, the authors estimated that 101 of 126 (80.2%) patients who did not receive postoperative RT were potential candidates for postoperative RT. Patients who received postoperative RT had more documented inpatient (48.7% vs 32.5%, p < 0.001) and outpatient (100.0% vs 65.1%, p < 0.001) radiation oncology consultations than those who did not. Additionally, patients who received postoperative RT had a higher rate of postoperative chemotherapy (53.1% vs 25.4%, p < 0.001), while patients who did not receive postoperative RT had a higher rate of preoperative RT (7.1% vs 31.0%, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis confirmed that patients who received preoperative RT had lower odds of undergoing postoperative RT (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.06-0.34; p < 0.001), and patients who underwent postoperative chemotherapy had higher odds of undergoing postoperative RT (OR 3.83, 95% CI 2.05-7.17; p < 0.001). In the current study reflecting real-world care of patients with metastatic spine disease after undergoing separation surgery, 47% of patients did not receive postoperative RT, and 80% of those patients were potential candidates for postoperative RT. Radiation oncology consultation and postoperative chemotherapy were significantly associated with receiving postoperative RT, whereas preoperative RT was significantly associated with not receiving postoperative RT. The lack of timely postoperative RT highlights a potential gap in metastatic spine tumor care and underscores the necessity for prompt radiation oncology consultation and effective planning.

Postoperative radiotherapy versus surgery alone in pN1 oral cavity cancer patients: A meta-analysis.

The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the potential benefits of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in patients with pN1 oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. A literature search through major databases was conducted until January 2023. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) or risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of different survival outcomes were extracted and pooled. Ten studies published between 2005 and 2022, with a pooled patient population of 2888, were included in this meta-analysis. Due to differences in study design and reported outcomes, the studies were categorized into distinct groups. In pN1 patients without extranodal extension (ENE), PORT was associated with a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) (aHR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.61-0.94). In pN1 patients without ENE and positive margins, PORT improved OS (aHR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.56-0.89) and was associated with a lower regional recurrence rate (RR 0.35, 95% CI: 0.15-0.83). However, in pN1 patients without ENE, positive margins, perineural invasion, and lymphovascular invasion, there were no significant differences observed between the PORT and observation groups in either 5-year OS (RR 0.48, 95% CI: 0.07-3.41) or 5-year disease-free survival (RR 0.37, 95% CI: 0.07-2.06). The current study demonstrated that PORT has the potential to improve OS in pN1 disease. However, the decision of whether to administer PORT still hinges on diverse clinical scenarios, and additional research is necessary to furnish a more conclusive resolution. 2.

Postoperative radiotherapy does not improve survival in patients with Masaoka-Koga stage IIB thymomas: A propensity score matching study based on the SEER database.

This study, based on a population, explored the prognostic value of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for Masaoka-Koga IIB stage thymomas. Patients diagnosed with thymoma from 2004 to 2017 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were included in the retrospective study. Through propensity score matching, the baseline characteristics of the patients were successfully matched to mitigate the selection bias of PORT. Survival rates and survival curves were compared between the PORT and non-PORT groups, with potential confounding factors addressed using a multivariate Cox regression model. In this study, 785 cases of IIB stage thymoma were included from the SEER database, and 303 patients were successfully matched between PORT and non-PORT groups through propensity score matching, with no significant differences in baseline characteristics. In the PORT and non-PORT groups, 10-year overall survival rates were 65.2% versus 59.6%, and cancer-specific survival rates were 87.0% vs. 84.4%, PORT did not yield statistically significant improvements in overall survival (P = .275) or cancer-specific survival (P = .336) for stage IIB thymomas. Based on the SEER database, the results of our study indicated that PORT does not confer a significant survival benefit for IIB stage thymomas.

Platinum-based adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma

PurposeThe objective of the study was to assess the effectiveness and toxicity of platinum-based adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (POCRT) in comparison to postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in patients with head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma (HNACC).Materials and methodsThis retrospective study analyzed patients diagnosed with HNACC at our center between January 2010 and April 2020. A 1:1 propensity score matching method was used to create a matched cohort.ResultsIn this study, 206 patients were analyzed, with 147 patients (71.4%) receiving postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) and 59 patients (28.6%) receiving POCRT. Twenty-one patients experienced local–regional failure. The 3-, 5-, and 10-yr local–regional control (LRC) rate for the cohort were 92.0%, 90.6%, and 86.9%, respectively. In both the entire cohort and the matched cohort, the POCRT group exhibited superior LRC compared to the PORT group (Gray's test, all P < 0.05*). Multivariate analysis identified adjuvant concurrent chemotherapy as an independent prognostic factor for LRC (Competing risks regression, HR = 0.144, 95% CI 0.026–0.802, P = 0.027*). In addition, the POCRT group had higher incidences of upper gastrointestinal toxicity and hematologic toxicities, including leukopenia, neutropenia, and anemia (all P < 0.05*).ConclusionIn terms of reducing locoregional failures in HNACC patients, POCRT may potentially offer a more effective therapeutic approach than using PORT alone, although it also entails an augmented burden of treatment-related toxicity.

Clinical impact of postoperative radiotherapy in pIII-N2 non-small cell lung cancer after complete resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Theoretically, postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) could reduce the risk of local recurrence and further improve survival outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of PORT on patients with pIII-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after complete resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. A systematic literature search was performed in November 2022 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compare PORT with observation in patients with pIII-N2 NSCLC using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. This meta-analysis is in accordance with the recommendations of the PRISMA statement. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local recurrence rates, which were compared using hazard ratios (HRs). Five RCTs involving 1,138 patients were included: 572 patients in the PORT group and 566 patients in the observation group. The methodological quality of the five RCTs was high. Pooled analysis revealed that PORT decreased local recurrence rate [odds ratio =0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.40-0.70]. However, PORT did not improve median DFS (HR =0.93, 95% CI: 0.80-1.08) and OS (HR =0.94, 95% CI: 0.78-1.14). Compared to adjuvant chemotherapy alone, additional PORT was significantly associated with a reduced local recurrence rate. However, neither DFS nor OS benefited from PORT in patients with pIII-N2 NSCLC who had undergone complete resection.

Skull-Base Chondrosarcoma: A Systematic Review of the Role of Postoperative Radiotherapy.

Surgery and radiotherapy are key elements to the treatment of skull-base chondrosarcomas; however, there is currently no consensus regarding whether or not adjuvant radiotherapy has to be administered. This study searched the EMBASE, Cochrane, and PubMed databases for clinical studies evaluating the long-term prognosis of surgery with or without adjuvant radiotherapy. After reviewing the search results, a total of 22 articles were selected for this review. A total of 1388 patients were included in this cohort, of which 186 received surgery only. With mean follow-up periods ranging from 39.1 to 86 months, surgical treatment provided progression-free survival (PFS) rates ranging from 83.7 to 92.9% at 3 years, 60.0 to 92.9% at 5 years, and 58.2 to 64.0% at 10 years. Postoperative radiotherapy provides PFS rates ranging between 87 and 96.2% at 3 years, 57.1 and 100% at 5 years, and 67 and 100% at 10 years. Recurrence rates varied from 5.3% to 39.0% in the surgery-only approach and between 1.5% and 42.90% for the postoperative radiotherapy group. When considering prognostic variables, higher age, brainstem/optic apparatus compression, and larger tumor volume prior to radiotherapy were found to be significant factors for local recurrence.

Meningeal Solitary Fibrous Tumor: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

Meningeal solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) are rare, malignant, mesenchymal tumors of the central nervous system. While surgical gross total resection is widely accepted as a positive prognostic factor for local control (LC), the role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) remains controversial. We sought to report our institutional experience with a particular focus on outcomes after PORT. In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, 20 patients with the primary diagnosis of histopathologically confirmed meningeal SFT were analyzed. Data on patient characteristics, imaging, treatment modalities, histopathology, and oncological outcomes were collected. LC and overall survival (OS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. The median follow-up time was 95.8 months. After surgery only, 9 out of 11 patients (81.8%) developed a local recurrence while, after surgery and PORT, 3 out of 9 patients (33.33%) showed local failure. The 5- and 10-year LC rates were 50.5% and 40.4% in the surgery-only group and 80% at both time points in the surgery with the PORT group. In the surgery-only group, 4 out of 11 patients (36.4%) died, and 4 out of 9 patients (44.4%) died in the surgery and PORT group. OS rates after 5 and 10 years were 88.9% and 66.7% in the surgery-only group and 88.9% and 76.2% in the surgery with PORT group. Our findings suggest that PORT may improve LC in patients with meningeal SFT. The low incidence of meningeal SFT impedes prospective studies and requires further international collaborative efforts to exploit retrospective datasets and molecular analysis to improve patient outcomes.

Postoperative Radiotherapy in Curatively Resected Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma With Occult Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Lymph Node Metastasis.

Surgery is the mainstream treatment for early-stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and occult recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node metastasis (RLNM) is not uncommon among those with R0 resection. The clinical value of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in patients with RLNM only is still controversial. Consecutive patients with early-stage ESCC treated with R0 resection and pathologically confirmed RLNM only from June 2012 to July 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. PORT, covering the supraclavicular and superior mediastinum area (small T-field) at a dose of 50.4Gy for 28 fractions, was performed in some patients. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the baseline characteristics between patients with or without PORT. Pattern of failure, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared. Among the 189 patients identified, 69 (35.5%) received PORT and the other 120 (63.5%) did not. After PSM, 154 patients were included in the matched cohort, including 62 in the PORT group and 92 in the non-PORT group. With a median follow-up of 48 (95% CI: 40.3-55.7) months, 69 patients developed their initial disease recurrence in the whole population and PORT significantly decreased the frequency of local recurrence (61.2% vs 21.4%) among those with recurrent disease. Additionally, in the PSM matched cohort, PORT significantly prolonged patients' DFS (HR 0.393, P = 0.002) and OS (HR 0.462, P = 0.020). Moreover, PORT remained as the independent factor associated with improved DFS (HR 0.360, P = 0.001) and OS (HR 0.451, P = 0.021) after multivariate Cox analyses. In addition, tumor location and pathological TNM stage were found to be independent prognostic factors associated with survival outcomes. PORT is associated with improved DFS and OS in ESCC patients with R0 resection and RLNM only, which warrants future validation.

The Feasibility of Omitting Postoperative Radiotherapy in Japanese Patients With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of Breast Treated With Breast-Conserving Surgery.

Background To analyze the feasibility of omitting postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in Japanese patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Materials and methods We retrospectively analyzed 88 patients with small pure DCIS (median diameter 1.1 cm, ≤ 4 cm) who underwent BCS with (n = 39) or without (n = 49) PORT.The primary and secondary endpoints were ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) and overall survival (OS), respectively, between the groups that received PORT and those that did not. Results The PORT group included a high number of margin-positive cases. The incidence of IBTR was 2.4% (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.3-15.7%) and 2.8% (95% CI, 0.4-18.2%) at five years and 5.5% (95% CI, 1.4-20.6%) and 2.8% (95% CI, 0.4-18.2%) at 10 years in patients without and with PORT, respectively (p = 0.686). In the margin-negative group, only one patient showed IBTR without RT (2.3%), whereas no patient with PORT experienced IBTR (0%). To date, there have been no regional or distant metastases; therefore, no patient has experienced breast cancer-related deaths.The OS rates were 97.7% (95% CI, 84.9-99.6%) and 100% at 10 years in patients without and with PORT, respectively (p = 0.372). Conclusion This study suggests that the omission of PORT after BCS could be a feasible option for selected Japanese patientsbut requires further investigation to identify the low-risk factor in patients who can omit PORT.

Comparison of the incidence of wound complications with preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy in patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma resection: A meta-analysis.

We performed a meta-analysis to compare the effect of preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy on wound complications after resection of extremity soft tissue sarcoma (ESTS). A comprehensive computerised search of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP, and Wanfang databases was conducted from their inception to August 2023 to identify studies comparing the effect of preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy on wound complications after ESTS resection. Two investigators independently screened the literature, extracted the data, and assessed the quality of the articles. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. Nine studies with 1271 patients were included, with 631 and 640 patients in the preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy groups, respectively. The results showed that the incidence of postoperative wound complications after ESTS resection was significantly higher with preoperative radiotherapy than with postoperative radiotherapy (27.26% vs. 12.03%, odds ratio [OR]: 2.88, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.12-3.91, p < 0.001). However, the rate of local recurrence of ESTS was significantly lower with preoperative radiotherapy than with postoperative radiotherapy (8.75% vs. 14.81%, OR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.36-0.91, p = 0.02), and the 3-year overall survival was significantly higher in the preoperative radiotherapy group than in the postoperative radiotherapy group (82.24% vs. 70.04%, OR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.05-3.71, p = 0.03). This pooled analysis suggests that although preoperative radiotherapy increases the rate of wound complications in ESTS compared with postoperative radiotherapy, it significantly reduces the rate of local recurrence after ESTS resection and improves the overall survival of patients. Owing to the limitations in the number and quality of the included studies, additional prospective cohort studies or randomised controlled trials are required to confirm these findings.

Radiotherapy-induced dynamic changes in the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in patients with laryngeal cancer indicate poor prognosis.

We hypothesized that markers of inflammation correlate with response to radiotherapy in patients with non-metastatic laryngeal cancer (LC). Our aim was to assess peripheral and local markers of inflammation including lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), infiltrating CD8+ lymphocytes (TILsCD8), and programmed death 1 ligand (PD-L1) expression. We performed a retrospective single-center analysis of LC patients administered definitive (R-RT) or postoperative radiotherapy (PORT). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) in relation to peripheral and local inflammatory markers and their dynamic changes during RT. Study group included 215 patients (R-RT, n=116; PORT, n=99). The baseline (t0) NLR and LMR were significantly correlated with OS in the R-RT group. In patients with high and low NLR at t0, the five-year OS was 33% and 56% (p=0.010) and in high and low LMR at t0, the five-year OS was 56% and 27% (p=0.003), respectively. The LMR increase during R-RT predicted better prognosis: the five-year OS in high and low LMR was 57% and 31% at t2 (after 2 weeks of RT) (p=0.015), 49% and 26% at t4 (p< 0.001), and 50% and 25% at t6 (p=0.013), respectively. Multivariable analysis shows that the worse performance status (p=0.003), the presence of nodal metastases (p=0.0001), and low baseline LMR (p=0.049) in the R-RT group, and the presence of nodal metastases (p=0.035) and completion treatment on time (p=0.042) in PORT group were associated with poor prognosis. The PD-L1 expression had no significant prognostic value in any of the examined patients. The baseline LMR and its dynamic changes during R-RT and baseline NLR are independent prognostic factors in patients with nonmetastatic LC. PD-L1 expression and number of TILsCD8 have no prognostic value in R-RT and PORT group.

Survival benefit of surgery with postoperative radiotherapy in locally advanced cervical adenocarcinoma: a population-based analysis

BackgroundThe incidence of cervical adenocarcinoma (AC) has experienced a considerable increase in recent decades. Despite this, our understanding of the optimal management of locally advanced cervical AC remains limited. The present study sought to compare the clinical outcomes of radical hysterectomy with postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) and primary radiotherapy (RT) in patients with locally advanced cervical AC using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.MethodsThe data were extracted from the SEER database utilizing the SEER ∗ STAT software (version 8.4.0.1). The study included patients diagnosed with locally advanced cervical AC between 2004 and 2017 with adequate information available for analysis. Patients were assigned to either the Surgery + PORT or Primary RT group based on treatment modality, and their clinical characteristics were compared. Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics between groups. The primary endpoints of the study were overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).ResultsOf the 1363 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 302 (22.16%) underwent Surgery + PORT, while 1061 patients received Primary RT. The two groups differed significantly in terms of age, year of diagnosis, tumor size, grade, stage, T/N stage, and chemotherapy. PSM was performed to balance the baseline characteristics between the two groups, resulting in 594 patients being analyzed. After PSM, the Surgery + PORT group exhibited significantly improved survival rates. The 5-year OS rates were 69.7% (95% CI: 63.3%-76.9%) for the Surgery + PORT group and 60.9% (95% CI: 56.0%-66.3%) for the group receiving Primary RT (p = 0.002). The 5-year CSS rates for the two groups were 70.7% (95% CI: 64.3%-77.8%) and 66.2% (95% CI: 61.3%-71.5%), respectively (p = 0.049). Multivariate analysis revealed that Surgery + PORT was an independent favorable prognostic factor for OS (HR = 0.60, p = 0.001) and CSS (HR = 0.69, p = 0.022). Although the combined approach of surgery and PORT resulted in a favorable impact on OS in patients aged 65 years or older (HR = 0.57, p = 0.048), it did not result in a statistically significant improvement in CSS in the same age group (HR = 0.56, p = 0.087). Similarly, the combined treatment did not yield a statistically significant increase in either OS (HR = 0.78, p = 0.344) or CSS (HR = 0.89, p = 0.668) in patients with tumors larger than 60 mm.ConclusionThe present study demonstrated that Surgery + PORT was associated with improved OS and CSS in patients with locally advanced cervical AC when compared to Primary RT. As such, Surgery + PORT may be a preferable therapeutic option for carefully selected patients with cervical AC. These findings offer valuable insight into the management of locally advanced cervical AC and may assist in personalized treatment decisions.

Efficacy of Postoperative Radiotherapy for Patients with New N2 Descriptors of Subclassification in Completely Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Study

Patients with N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were heterogeneous groups and required further stratification. The International Society for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) added new descriptors of three sub-stages for stage N2 NSCLC: N2 at a single station without N1 involvement (N2a1), N2 at a single station with N1 involvement (N2a2), and N2 at multiple stations (N2b). This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for patients with these N2 descriptors. Patients with histologically confirmed NSCLC after complete resection and divided into PORT group and non-PORT group. The primary endpoint was DFS. The second endpoints were overall survival (OS) and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS). Propensity-score matching (PSM) of baseline characteristics between the PORT and non-PORT groups was used for validation. Totally 1832 patients were enrolled, including 308 N2a1 patients, 682 N2a2 patients, and 842 N2b patients. The median follow-up time was 50.1 months. The survival outcomes of the PORT and non-PORT groups before PSM were shown in Table 1. For patients with N2a1, PORT could not improve the DFS (median DFS of the PORT group and the non-PORT group: not reached vs. 46.8 months, P = 0.41), OS (P = 0.85), or LRFS (P = 0.32), which were consistent with the multivariate analysis and data after the PSM. For patients with N2a2, PORT significantly improved the DFS (median DFS 29.7 vs. 22.2 months, P = 0.02), OS (P = 0.03), and LRFS (P = 0.01). The multivariate analysis and data after the PSM confirmed the benefits in DFS and LRFS, but no benefit was observed in OS (multivariate analysis: HR 0.79, P = 0.18; median OS after PSM: 103.7 vs. 63.1 months, P = 0.34). For patients with N2b, PORT could not improve the DFS (median DFS 20.6 vs. 21.2 months, P = 0.39) but significantly improved the OS (P<0.001) and LRFS (P<0.001). However, the multivariate analysis showed that PORT significantly improved DFS (HR 0.81, P = 0.03), consistent with the data after the PSM (median DFS 20.6 and 17.6 months, P = 0.04). PORT significantly improved the DFS and LRFS in patients with N2a2 and significantly improved the DFS, LRFS, and OS in patients with N2b. Patients with N2a1 could not benefit from PORT.

The Value of Postoperative Radiotherapy in Thymoma with Myasthenia Gravis

For patients with thymoma combined with myasthenia gravis (MG), surgery is the first-line treatment. However, there is still debate on the effects of radiotherapy among these patients. This study is aimed to investigate the efficacy and prognosis of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) on thymoma patients with MG. This retrospective cohort study included 126 patients with MG and thymoma from 2011 to 2021. Demographic data and information that were collected included sex, age, histologic subtype, Masaoka-Koga staging, the primary tumor, lymph node, and metastasis (TNM) staging and therapy modalities. Changes in the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis Score (QMGs) within 3 months after treatment were used to evaluate the short-term MG symptom improvement after PORT. Minimal manifestation status (MMS) was the main endpoint of assessing the long-term MG symptom improvement. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were the primary endpoints for PORT in prognosis. Effects of PORT on MG symptom: there was a significant difference in QMG scores between non-PORT and PORT groups (χ2 = 6.300, p = 0.012). The median time to achieve MMS of patients in the PORT group was significantly shorter when compared with the non-PORT group (2.0 years versus 4.4 years [p = 0.031]). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that radiotherapy was associated with a shorter time to achieve MMS (HR 1.971, 95% CI:1.102-3.525, p = 0.022). Effects of PORT on DFS and OS: the 10-year OS rate of the whole cohort was 90.5%. The OS rates of the PORT group and the non-PORT group were 94.4% and 85.1% respectively. The 5-year DFS rates in the whole cohort, PORT group, and non-PORT group were 89.7%, 95.8%%, and 81.5%, respectively. PORT was associated with improved DFS (HR 0.139, 95% CI: 0.037-0.533, p = 0.004). In the high-risk histologic subgroup (type B2, B3), PORT exhibited better survival than non-PORT in OS (p = 0.015) and DFS (p = 0.0053). PORT remained associated with improved DFS (HR 0.232, 95% CI: 0.069-0.782, p = 0.018) in Masaoka-Koga staging II, III, and IV disease. The efficacy of PORT in patients with thymoma and MG is positive. Patients in the higher histologic subtype and Masaoka-Koga staging may benefit more obviously.

Preoperative Radiotherapy Does Not Change the Existing Treatment Paradigm in Stage III Breast Cancer

Introduction: Radiotherapy (RT) plays an indispensable role in postoperative breast cancer treatment. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of preoperative RT for stage III breast cancer by comparing preoperative RT with postoperative RT in terms of overall survival (OS). Methods: Based on the information in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2000 to 2018, patients with stage III breast cancer who had undergone radical surgery and RT were divided into two groups: a preoperative RT group and a postoperative RT group. OS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate independent factors associated with OS. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance stratification factors. Results: In total, 9,605 patients were enrolled, of whom 9,456 received postoperative RT and 149 received preoperative RT. After a median follow-up of 72 months, postoperative RT was found to be superior to preoperative RT in terms of OS (p < 0.000). Compared to the postoperative RT group, the preoperative RT group showed a significantly higher risk of overall mortality without PSM in univariate (OS: hazard ratio [HR] = 1.653, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.288–2.123, p < 0.000) and multivariate analyses (OS: HR = 1.409, 95% CI: 1.096–1.810, p = 0.007). After PSM, the OS of the postoperative RT group was superior to the OS in the preoperative RT group (p = 0.041). Compared with the postoperative RT group, the preoperative RT group showed a significantly higher risk of overall mortality without PSM in univariate (HR = 1.312, 95% CI: 1.010–1.704, p = 0.042) and multivariate analyses (HR = 1.466, 95% CI: 1.127–1.906, p = 0.004). Conclusion: Preoperative RT does not improve OS in patients with stage III breast cancer and has a worse prognosis. Preoperative RT has not changed the existing treatment paradigm in the current therapeutic context for patients with stage III breast cancer.

Comparison of pre-operative and post-operative radiotherapy in patients with localized myxoid liposarcoma.

Myxoid liposarcoma is more radiosensitive than other soft tissue sarcomas, and radiotherapy has been reported to reduce tumour size. This study was performed to compare the rates of local recurrence, survival and wound complications between pre- and post-operative radiotherapy for localized myxoid liposarcoma. From the Japanese Nationwide Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Registry database, 200 patients with localized myxoid liposarcoma who received pre- (range, 30-56Gy) or post-operative (range, 45-70Gy) radiotherapy and surgery were included in this retrospective study. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for background differences between patients who received pre- and post-operative radiotherapy. Local recurrence occurred in five (5.0%) and nine (9.0%) patients in the pre- and post-operative radiotherapy groups, respectively (both n=100). The median follow-up time from diagnosis was 40.5months (IQR, 26.3-74). Univariate analysis showed a similar risk of local recurrence between the pre- and post-operative radiotherapy groups (5-year local recurrence-free survival 94.9% [95% CI 87.0-98.1] vs. 89.0% [95% CI 79.6-94.3]; P=0.167). Disease-specific survival was similar between the pre- and post-operative radiotherapy groups (5-year disease-specific survival 88.1% [95% CI 75.5-94.6] vs. 88.4% [95% CI 77.3-94.5]; P=0.900). The incidence of wound complications was similar between the pre- and post-operative radiotherapy groups (7.0% vs. 12.0%; P=0.228). There was no difference in local recurrence, survival or incidence of wound complications between pre- and post-operative radiotherapy for localized myxoid liposarcoma. Therefore, pre-operative radiotherapy for myxoid liposarcoma provides clinical results equivalent to post-operative radiotherapy.

T4 larinks kanseri için tedavi seçimi: kemoradyoterapi ile organ koruyucu yaklaşım mümkün mü yoksa multimodalite tedavi daha mı etkili?

Aims: Organ-preserving approach is recommended as an evidence-based treatment option for advanced laryngeal cancer (LC) with similar survival results. However, the organ-preserving approach in T4 disease is controversial, and surgical treatment is primarily preferred. Today, chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is applied to T4 LC patients who are inoperable for medical or surgical reasons and upon the request of the patient who refuses the recommended surgical treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment outcomes in patients with T4 LC who underwent CRT for these conditions and received adjuvant radiotherapy (RT)/CRT as the standard treatment regimen after surgery.&#x0D; Methods: A retrospective review of T4 LC patients treated with CRT (17 patients) and adjuvant RT/CRT (26 patients) between 2015 and 2021 was conducted. Overall survival (OS), local regional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between the groups. The organ preservation rate was determined for the CRT group.&#x0D; Results: The median follow-up time for the entire cohort was 41 months, the 5-y OS, LRRFS, and DFS were 55.9%, 51.4%, and 51.9%, respectively. Statistically significant difference was found between the treatment groups in terms of 5-y OS, LRRFS, and DFS rates, and survival was found to be decreased in the CRT group (35.3% vs. 70.2%, p=0.007; 22.1% vs. 75.1%, p= 0.001; 22.1% vs. 75.7%, p=0.001). With respect to other clinicopathological factors, age was the only significant factor in on OS in multivariate analysis, whereas tumor size, nodal stage, and ECE (in the postoperative RT group, except LRRFS) were linked with OS, LRRFS, and DFS rates. Among the patients who underwent CRT, OS was found to be better in the group applied due to the patient’s request compared to the patients referred for RT due to medical or surgical inoperability, and in multivariate analysis, the indication for RT remained an independent predictor of OS. In addition, the 3-y organ preservation rate was 81.5% in the CRT group.&#x0D; Conclusion: The surgical arm had statistically significantly superior results in terms of OS, LRRFS, DFS compared to the CRT group. However, it is also noteworthy that OS was better in cases where RT is applied at the patient’s request without inoperable disease. In addition, laryngeal protection was observed to a large extent in the CRT arm.

The high-risk features and effect of postoperative radiotherapy on survival for patients with surgically treated stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer

ObjectivesAlthough postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) could reduce the incidence of local recurrence in patients with IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the role of PORT on survival in patients with surgically treated stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC remains controversial. Therefore, this study was designed to evaluate the effect of PORT on survival for patients with surgically treated stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC.Materials and methodsThis study population was chosen from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to determine significant contributors to overall survival (OS) and cancer special survival (CSS) outcomes. To balance baseline characteristics between the non-PORT group and PORT group, propensity score matching (PSM) with 1:1 propensity nearest-neighbor match by 0.001 matching tolerance was conducted by R software. Furthermore, a Kaplan–Meier curve was used to visualize the OS and CSS between the PORT group and non-PORT group survival probability.ResultsOf all evaluated cases, 4511 with IIIA-N2 NSCLC were eligible for inclusion, of which 1920 were enrolled into the PORT group. On univariate analysis and multivariate analysis, sex, age, year of diagnosis, race, histologic type, T stage, PORT, use of chemotherapy, and positive regional nodes were significantly associated with OS and CSS in IIIA-N2 NSCLC (P < 0.05). However, PORT was not significantly associated with OS (univariate HR = 0.92, 95%CI 0.85–0.99, P = 0.02; multivariate HR = 1.01, 95%CI 0.93–1.08, P = 0.91) and CSS (univariate HR = 0.92, 95%CI 0.85–1.01, P = 0.06; multivariate HR = 1.103 95%CI 0.94–1.12, P = 0.56) in IIIA-N2 NSCLC. Meanwhile, after PSM, neither OS nor CSS did differ significantly between the non-PORT group and PORT group (OS HR = 1.08, 95%CI 0.98–1.19, P = 0.12; CSS HR = 1.10, 95%CI 0.99–1.23, P = 0.07).ConclusionPORT did not contribute to a survival benefit in patients with surgically treated stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC.