Propensity-matched study on locally advanced esophageal cancer: surgery versus post-operative radiotherapy

Abstract

BackgroundThis study aims to delineate the long-term outcomes and recurrence patterns of locally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) patients managed with or without postoperative radiotherapy (PORT).MethodsA retrospective cohort from two academic centers, encompassing patients who initially underwent esophagectomy and were pathologically staged T3-4, was analyzed. Survival outcomes were constructed using Kaplan–Meier method, with survival significance was evaluated using the log-rank test. Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to balance potential selection bias.ResultsAmong the 506 patients, 251 underwent surgery alone and 255 received radiotherapy following radical surgery. With a median follow-up of 49.1 months, PORT significantly improved 5-year overall survival (53.8% vs. 25.3%; p < 0.001) and 5-year disease-free survival rates (45.3% vs. 8.5%; p < 0.001) compared to surgery alone. These differences in survival outcomes persisted even after PSM (p < 0.001 for both). Treatment failure was significantly less frequent in the PORT group (46.7%) compared to the surgery-only group (90.0%; p < 0.001), with corresponding reductions in locoregional recurrence (9.4% vs. 54.1%; p < 0.001). This underscores the significant association between PORT and disease control.ConclusionThe absence of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy highlights the importance of PORT in improving survival and reducing recurrence in advanced T3-4 TESCC patients. This study underscores the importance of PORT as a salvage treatment for locally advanced TESCC patients without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.