Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula Grade Research Articles

The prognostic value of Presepsin for postoperative complications following pancreatic resection: A prospective study.

BackgroundPresepsin is involved in binding lipopolysaccharides and previous studies have confirmed its value as a marker for early diagnosis and prediction of severity in sepsis. Comparable studies assessing the predictive potential regarding postoperative complications and mortality following pancreatic resection are lacking.MethodsThis prospective study included 70 patients undergoing pancreatic resection from December 2017 until May 2019. Presepsin was measured preoperatively, on postoperative day 1, 3 and 8 (POD1/3/8) and correlated with the clinical course and mortality.ResultsSevere complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3a) occurred in 28 patients (40%), postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) grade B/C occurred in 20 patients (28.6%), infectious complications in 28 (40%), and four patients (5.7%) died during hospital stay. Presepsin levels at any timepoint did not correlate with further development of postoperative complications or in-hospital mortality whereas CRP levels on postoperative day (POD) 3 were significantly associated with clinically relevant POPF (AUC 0.664, 95%CI 0.528–0.800; p = 0.033). Preoperative Presepsin levels as well as Presepsin on POD1 were significantly elevated in patients with malignant compared to benign underlying disease (299pg/ml vs. 174pg/ml and 693.5pg/ml vs. 294pg/ml; p = 0.009 and 0.013, respectively).ConclusionIn our cohort, Presepsin was not eligible to predict the postoperative course following pancreatic resection. However, Presepsin levels were significantly elevated in patients with malignant disease, this finding warrants further investigation.

Evaluation of an enhanced recovery program for outcome improvement after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A retrospective cohort study

BackgroundThe introduction of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has led to a reduction in hospital stay (LOS) without compromising surgical outcome. The primary endpoint of this study is to evaluate the adherence to postoperative targets of the ERAS protocol, and to describe short-term surgical outcomes. The secondary endpoints are 30-day readmission rate, reoperation rate and mortality. Materials and methodsThis single centre retrospective analysis reviews all data of patients who underwent a PD in our tertiary referral hospital between August 2016 and December 2019. A total of 170 patients were operated of whom 154 patients were enrolled in the ERAS protocol. As per ERAS protocol, epidural analgesia was stopped on postoperative day (POD) 2, nasogastric tube (NGT) removed on POD3, regular food tolerated by POD5. Drains were removed on POD2 and POD3, the soft drain along the pancreatic anastomosis between POD3-10. ResultsEpidural analgesia was removed on POD2 in 26 patients (17.7%), NGT removed on POD3 in 74 patients (49.0%), regular food tolerated by POD5 in 52 patients (34.9%). The lateral drain was removed in 81 patients (52.9%) on POD2, the medial drain in 39 patients (26.2%) on POD3, the soft drain in 95 patients (61.7%) between POD3 and 10. Nine patients (5.8%) had post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage (PPH), 14 (9.1%) postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B or C (POPF), 5 (3.3%) bile leakage, and 44 (28.6%) delayed gastric emptying (DGE). The 30-day readmission rate was 8.4%, reoperation rate 10.4%, and the in-hospital mortality 1.3%. ConclusionsThe adherence to targets of the ERAS protocol was found to be rather low. Biliary leakage, POPF, DGE, and PPH all led to an adapted ERAS protocol with prolonged LOS. Most complications were detected along the ERAS pathway, indicating that also patients at high risk for complications can be safely included in the ERAS protocol.

Preoperative CT anthropometric measurements and pancreatic pathology increase risk for postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a common complication following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). However, risk factors for this complication remain controversial. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 107 patients who underwent PD. POPF was diagnosed in strict accordance with the definition of the 2016 update of pancreatic fistula from the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors for POPF. A total of 19 (17.8%) subjects of pancreatic fistula occurred after PD, including 15 (14.1%) with grade B POPF and 4 (3.7%) with grade C POPF. There were 33 (30.8%) patients with biochemical leak. Risk factors for POPF (grade B and C) were larger area of visceral fat (odds ratio [OR], 1.40; p = 0.040) and pathology other than pancreatic adenocarcinoma or pancreatitis (OR, 12.45; p = 0.017) in the multivariate regression analysis. This result could assist the surgeon to identify patients at a high risk of developing POPF.

What should we trust to define, predict and assess pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy?

ObjectiveThe ISGPF postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) definition using amylase drain concentration is widely used. However, the interest of lipase drain concentration, daily drain output and absolute enzyme daily production (concentration x daily drain volume) have been poorly investigated. Material and methodsThese predictive on postoperative day (POD) 1, 3, 5 and 7 were analyzed in a development cohort, and subsequently tested in an independent validation cohort. ResultsOf the 227 patients of the development cohort, 17% developed a biochemical fistula and 34% a POPF (Grade B/C). Strong correlation was found between amylase/lipase drain concentration at all postoperative days (ρ = 0.90; p = 0.001). Amylase and lipase were both significantly higher in patients with a POPF (p < 0.001) presenting an equivalent under the ROC curve area (0.85 vs 0.84; p = 0.466). Combining POD1 and POD3 threefold enzyme cut-off value increased significantly POPF prediction sensibility (97.4% vs 77.8%) and NPV (97.1% vs 86.3%). These results were also confirmed in the validation cohort of 554 patients. Finally, absolute enzyme daily production and daily drain output were significantly higher in patients with a POPF (p < 0.001) but did not add clinical value when compared to drain enzyme concentration. ConclusionLipase is as effective as amylase drain concentration to define POPF. Absolute enzyme daily production or daily drain output do not help to better predict clinically significant POPF occurrence and severity. Lipase and amylase should mainly be used for their negative predictive value to predict the absence of clinically significant POPF and could allow early drain removal and hospital discharge.

Pancreatic resections in patients who refuse blood transfusions. The application of a perioperative protocol for a true bloodless surgery

BackgroundThe refusal of blood transfusions compels surgeons to face ethical and clinical issues. A single-institution experience with a dedicated perioperative blood management protocol was reviewed to assess feasibility and short-term outcomes of true bloodless pancreatic surgery. MethodsThe institutional database was reviewed to identify patients who refused transfusion and were scheduled for elective pancreatic surgery from 2010 through 2018. A protocol to optimize the hemoglobin values by administration of drugs stimulating erythropoiesis was systematically used. ResultsPerioperative outcomes of 32 Jehovah’s Witnesses patients were included. Median age was 67 years (range, 31–77). Nineteen (59.4%) patients were treated with preoperative erythropoietin. Twenty-four (75%) patients underwent pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy, 4 (12.5%) distal pancreatectomy (DP) with splenectomy, 3 (9.4%) spleen-preserving DP, and 1 (3.1%) total pancreatectomy. Median estimated blood loss and surgical duration were 400 mL (range, 100–1000) and 470 min (range, 290–595), respectively. Median preoperative hemoglobin was 13.9 g/dL (range, 11.7–15.8) while median postoperative nadir hemoglobin was 10.5 g/dL (range, 7.1–14.1). The most common histological diagnosis (n = 15, 46.9%) was pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Clavien-Dindo grade I-II complications occurred in fourteen (43.8%) patients while one (3.1%) patient had a Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa complication wich was an abdominal collection that required percutaneous drainage. Six (18.8%) patients presented biochemical leak or postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B. Median hospital stay was 16 days (range, 8–54) with no patient requiring transfusion or re-operation and no 90-day mortality. ConclusionsA multidisciplinary approach and specific perioperative management allowed performing pancreatic resections in patients who refused transfusion with good short-term outcomes.

High risk pathogens and risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy; a retrospective case-controlled study.

Although the rates of surgical site infection are decreasing, surgical site infection after pancreatectomy remains frequent because of postoperative pancreatic fistula. Recent studies suggested a relationship between postoperative pancreatic fistula and pathogens cultured from drainage fluids after pancreatectomy. This study aimed to assess and evaluate high-risk pathogens cultured from postoperative drainage fluids for postoperative pancreatic fistulas or severe postoperative complications after pancreatectomy. We retrospectively enrolled patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy between 2012 and 2019. We assessed clinical characteristics and microbiological results of drainage cultures of pancreaticoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy patients, and we investigated the risk factors for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulas and Clavien-Dindo status using univariate and multivariate analyses. Finally, we detected high-risk pathogens from drainage cultures and analyzed the correlation between these pathogens and the severity of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula or Clavien-Dindo status. Four hundred and twenty-nine patients were enrolled: 257 underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy and 172 underwent distal pancreatectomy. Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulas and Clavien-Dindo status≥III were more frequently seen in pancreaticoduodenectomy patients than in distal pancreatectomy patients, namely grade C postoperative pancreatic fistula, which was observed in 19 pancreaticoduodenectomy patients. The most common pathogen found from drainage cultures was Enterococcus species, followed by Enterobacter species and Candida species. All pathogens were associated with clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulas; however, Candida species was a dominant microorganism of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulas grade C, Clavien-Dindo status≥IV, and hemorrhage due to pseudoaneurysm. The presence of Candida species in the drainage fluid culture after pancreaticoduodenectomy can be a predictive factor of severe infectious complications, including postoperative pancreatic fistulas; thus, we should regularly collect cultures from drainage fluids and monitor for Candida infection.

Indications and outcomes of enucleation versus formal pancreatectomy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

BackgroundPancreatoduodenectomy (PD) or distal pancreatectomy (DP) are common procedures for patients with a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET). Nevertheless, certain patients may benefit from a pancreas-preserving resection such as enucleation (EN). The aim of this study was to define the indications and differences in long-term outcomes among patients undergoing EN and PD/DP. MethodsPatients undergoing resection of a pNET between 1992 and 2016 were identified. Indications and outcomes were evaluated, and propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to compare long-term outcomes between patients who underwent EN versus PD/DP. ResultsAmong 1034 patients, 143 (13.8%) underwent EN, 304 (29.4%) PD, and 587 (56.8%) DP. Indications for EN were small size (1.5 cm, IQR:1.0–1.9), functional tumors (58.0%) that were mainly insulinomas (51.7%). After PSM (n = 109 per group), incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) grade B/C was higher after EN (24.5%) compared with PD/DP (14.0%) (p = 0.049). Median recurrence-free survival (RFS) was comparable among patients who underwent EN (47 months, 95% CI:23–71) versus PD/DP (37 months, 95% CI: 33–47, p = 0.480). ConclusionComparable long-term outcomes were noted among patients who underwent EN versus PD/DP for pNET. The incidence of clinically significant POPF was higher after EN.

Pancreas-visceral fat CT value ratio and serrated pancreatic contour are strong predictors of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticojejunostomy

BackgroundOur aim is to elucidate the true preoperative risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), making it possible to select POPF high-risk patients preoperatively regardless of intraoperative pancreatic consistency judged by the surgeon’s hand.MethodsAmong the 298 patients who underwent PD with pancreaticojejunostomy from 2007 to 2016, 262 patients had preoperative CT configurations that could be precisely evaluated. Risk factor analyses were conducted using various perioperative factors, including preoperative CT findings, such as CT values of the pancreas, pancreas-visceral fat CT value ratio and pancreatic outer contour. Pancreatic outer contour was further divided into smooth- (smooth interlobular) and serrated-type contours (feathery, irregular interlobular) by preoperative CT.ResultsIn terms of the incidence of POPF, among the 262 patients, POPF grade B/C was found in 27 (10.3%): grade B in 23 (8.8%) and grade C in 4 (1.5%). According to multivariate analysis, a high pancreas-visceral fat CT value ratio (p = 0.002), serrated-type contour (p = 0.02) and no history of chemoradiotherapy (p = 0.019) were identified as independent risk factors for POPF grade B/C. Even in patients with soft pancreas, the incidence of POPF grade B/C was 0% (0/57) in patients with a pancreas-visceral fat CT value ratio of less than − 0.4 and smooth-type contour, whereas the incidence was markedly high (45.0%, 9/20) in patients with a pancreas-visceral fat CT value ratio of − 0.4 or greater and serrated-type contour, indicating that patients with soft pancreas should be categorized into POPF high-risk and low-risk groups according to preoperative CT scan results.ConclusionsThe pancreas-visceral fat CT value ratio and serrated-type pancreas are useful markers to preoperatively identify true POPF high-risk groups in patients undergoing PD, regardless of the pancreatic texture judged intraoperatively.

Usefulness of Drain Lipase to Predict Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula After Distal Pancreatectomy

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after distal pancreatectomy (DP) is a worrisome and life-threatening complication. The aim of this study was to clarify the risk factors and to find the early detective method of POPF after DP. From January 2010 through December 2014, 37 patients underwent DP and were enrolled in this study to examine the factors predictive of clinical POPF after DP. POPF was defined and classified according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery guideline 2016. Biochemical leakage occurred in 14 (37.8%) patients, grade B POPF in 16 (43.2%) patients, and no grade C POPF in any patient. Clinical POPF (grade B/C) occurred in 43.2% of patients. Multivariate analysis revealed pancreatic thickness ≥ 14 mm to be the independent preoperative risk factors predictive of POPF. Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that the drain lipase ≥ 800 IU/L on postoperative day 4 could distinguish clinical POPF from non-clinical POPF effectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 93.8%, 70.0%, and 80.6% respectively. Pancreatic thickness ≥ 14 mm was the independent preoperative predictive risk factors for POPF. A drain lipase level of ≥800 IU/L on POD 4 was useful to find clinical POPF after DP.

Facing the surgeon's nightmare: Incidence and management of postoperative pancreatic fistulas grade C after pancreaticoduodenectomy based on the updated definition of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery(ISGPS).

Postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) grade C represent a rare but feared complication following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). They can contribute significantly to postoperative morbidity and mortality. We performed a retrospective chart review for all patients who had undergone pancreatic head resection between 2007 and 2016 to identify those who suffered from POPF grade C according to the updated definition of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). A total of 722 patients underwent PD. Twenty-three patients (3.19%) developed a POPF grade C. Cardiovascular diseases, soft pancreatic texture and main pancreatic duct diameter were identified as risk factors (P<.05). Reoperation was necessary in all affected patients on postoperative day 12±9 on average. Mortality was significantly associated with POPF grade C (P<.05) being present in 39.1% (9/23). POPF grade C after PD remains a serious complication with a high level of morbidity and mortality. Surgical treatment is the sole curative therapy and thus the treatment of choice.

Comparison of Blumgart Anastomosis with Duct-to-Mucosa Anastomosis and Invagination Pancreaticojejunostomy After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Single-Center Propensity Score Matching Analysis

The Blumgart anastomosis is a method of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) which combines the principle of duct-to-mucosa anastomosis with an invagination technique of the pancreas. Retrospective study involving consecutive patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head cancer. Data predictive of pancreatic fistula and postoperative outcomes were collected. The patients were divided into three groups and were compared based on the type of pancreatic anastomosis performed: Blumgart anastomosis (BA), duct-to-mucosa anastomosis (DtoM), and invagination pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ). The primary endpoint was to determine the occurrence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF). The secondary endpoints were to determine whether postoperative pancreatic fistula grade C (POPF C) and/or severe complications occurred as well as to determine the reoperation rate and 30- and 90-day mortality. A propensity score matching analysis was used. Using propensity score matching (PSM), the occurrence of CR-POPF was not significantly different between the BA (21.6%) and the other pancreatic anastomoses (all 31.1%, DtoM = 27.0%; PJ = 35.1%). However, the BA significantly reduced (1) severe complications (0 versus 35.1%; P < 0.001) and 90-day mortality (0% versus 12.2%; P = 0.028) with respect to all anastomoses; (2) severe complications (0% versus 29.7%; P < 0.001), POPF grade C (0% versus 16.2%; P = 0.025), and reoperation (2.7% versus 16.2%; P = 0.056) with respect to DtoM; and (3) severe complications (0% versus 40.5%; P < 0.001) and 90-day mortality (0% versus 13.5%; P = 0.054) with respect to PJ. Applying the PSM analysis for the first time, the present study seemed to suggest that the BA succeeded in minimizing severe complications after PD.

Early outcome of whipple surgery in single center in sub-Saharan Africa

Background: No data was available about the magnitude of pancreatic cancer in Sudan and most of the patients who afford used to travel abroad seeking medical l management , our team was the first to establish a dedicated HPB surgery unit in Sudan Methods: our medical records was retrospectively reviewed and analyzed using data sheet and SPSS Results: one hundred eighty four patients were operated in the period from January 2016- January 2018. 43.8% were males , 56.2% were females .Mean age was 56+/- 11.1 (34-75) , mean duration of symptoms 4.5+/-2.6 months ,93.7% had Total bilirubin > 15 mg/dl , preoperative biliary drainage was done in 85% of the patients . locally advanced PDAC was detected in 16% of the patients by CT Scan preoperatively . Classical Whipple surgery was performed in 80% , and PPPD in 20% . Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy was used in four patients with SMA involvement . Tumor diameter 4.5+/-1.5 cm . it was T3 in 72% of the cases and N1 in 67% . Specimen pathology showed PDAC in 58% , CCa in 16.6% , Deoudenal Adenocarcinoma in 9.3% , Ampullary tumor in 4.2% , NET in 6.2% and 2.1% other pathologies. Pancreatic Anastomosis was duct to mucosa in 91% and Dunking in 9% . Postoperative pancreatic fistula Grade A developed in five patients & two patients had Grade B . Conclusion: we succeeded in establishing new service in our low income country with Results similar to international Results with acceptable complication rate and excellent outcome despite the late presentation of our patients , we implement neoadjuvant therapy in some of our locally advanced cases and even in some resectable cases because of our long waiting list , the long term Results of which is going to be studied further .

Hydrocortisone vs. pasireotide in preventing pancreatic surgery complications - prospective randomized controlled trial

Background: Pancreatic surgery has high rate of complications and most complications are due to postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Both hydrocortisone (Laaninen et al., J Ann Surg 2016) and pasireotide (Allen et al., NEJM 2014) has been showed to reduce POPF compared to placebo. This trial was set to find out whether these two drugs are equally efficient or not. Materials and Methods: In this study only the patients with high risk of POPF (soft gland texture and normal pancreatic duct in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy, all distal pancreatectomies and enucleations) were included and randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive perioperatively either hydrocortisone or pasireotide. Primary outcome was comprehensive complication index (CCI) 30 days postoperatively. Key secondary outcomes were rate of POPF and death. This was a non-inferiority trial, and difference larger than 10 CCI points was considered significant. Based on the sample size calculation 124 patients were needed to be randomized. Treating physicians, outcome assessors, data collectors, and data analysts were blinded to the assigned group. For interrim analysis, groups were assigned labels A or B, without knowing which label was which group. Results: The recruiting was stopped on 17th December 2018 after reaching the aimed sample size, and thus 30-day outcome is not yet assessable. An interrim analysis was performed in December 2017 when 64 patients were enrolled, and the 30-day follow up data was gathered. In group A, mean CCI was 23.3 and in group B 28.1 (difference -4.72 (95% CI -14.9 - -5.5)). The ratio of clinically relevant POPFs (grade B/C) were equal (19% vs. 16%). One patient died in both groups. Conclusions: Rates of complications, POPF and death were similar between the groups in interrim analysis, but non-inferiority was not yet demostrated. The final Results will be presented at the E-AHPBA Congress.

Influence of bile contamination for patients who undergo pancreaticoduodenectomy after biliary drainage.

BACKGROUNDThe influence of bile contamination on the infectious complications of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has not been thoroughly evaluated.AIMTo evaluate the effect of preoperative biliary drainage and bile contamination on the outcomes of patients who undergo PD.METHODSThe database of 4101 patients who underwent PD was reviewed. Preoperative biliary drainage was performed in 1964 patients (47.9%), and bile contamination was confirmed in 606 patients (14.8%).RESULTSThe incidence of postoperative infectious complications was 37.9% in patients with preoperative biliary drainage and 42.4% in patients with biliary contamination, respectively. Patients with extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma, ampulla of Vater carcinoma, and pancreatic carcinoma had a high frequency of preoperative biliary drainage (82.9%, 54.6%, and 50.8%) and bile contamination (34.3%, 26.2%, and 20.2%). Bile contamination was associated with postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) Grade B/C, wound infection, and catheter infection. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that biliary contamination (odds ratio 1.33, P = 0.027) was the independent risk factor for POPF Grade B/C. The three most commonly cultured microorganisms from bile (Enterococcus, Klebsiella, and Enterobacter) were identical to those isolated from organ spaces.CONCLUSIONIn patients undergoing PD, bile contamination is related to postoperative infectious complication including POPF Grade B/C. The management of biliary contamination should be standardised for patients who require preoperative biliary drainage for PD, as the main microorganisms are identical in both organ spaces and bile.

Impact of Neoadjuvant Therapy in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreatic Body or\xa0Tail on Surgical and Oncological Outcome: A Propensity-Score\xa0Matched Multicenter Study

BackgroundSeveral studies have suggested a survival benefit of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in the pancreatic head. Data concerning NAT for PDAC located in pancreatic body or tail are lacking.MethodsPost hoc analysis of an international multicenter retrospective cohort of distal pancreatectomy for PDAC in 34 centers from 11 countries (2007–2015). Patients who underwent resection after NAT were matched (1:1 ratio), using propensity scores based on baseline characteristics, to patients who underwent upfront resection. Median overall survival was compared using the stratified log-rank test.ResultsAmong 1236 patients, 136 (11.0%) received NAT, most frequently FOLFIRINOX (25.7%). In total, 94 patients receiving NAT were matched to 94 patients undergoing upfront resection. NAT was associated with less postoperative major morbidity (Clavien–Dindo ≥ 3a, 10.6% vs. 23.4%, P = 0.020) and pancreatic fistula grade B/C (9.6% vs. 21.3%, P = 0.026). NAT did not improve overall survival [27 (95% CI 14–39) versus 31 months (95% CI 19–42), P = 0.277], as compared with upfront resection. In a sensitivity analysis of 251 patients with radiographic tumor involvement of splenic vessels, NAT (n = 37, 14.7%) was associated with prolonged overall survival [36 (95% CI 18–53) versus 20 months (95% CI 15–24), P = 0.049], as compared with upfront resection.ConclusionIn this international multicenter cohort study, NAT for resected PDAC in pancreatic body or tail was associated with less morbidity and pancreatic fistula but similar overall survival in comparison with upfront resection. Prospective studies should confirm a survival benefit of NAT in patients with PDAC and splenic vessel involvement.

Morphological changes of the pancreas after pancreaticoduodenectomy

The aim of this retrospective study was thus to evaluate postoperative morphological changes in the remnant pancreas after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) associated with postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Fifty-one patients subjected to PD were enrolled in the study and allocated into 2 groups according to the presence (n = 16) or absence of POPF (n = 35). A morphological evaluation of the pancreas was conducted for up to a 20 months follow-up on CT scans and compared between groups. No significant differences were observed in morphology between the groups at the different preoperative and PO intervals, regardless of the clinical relevance of the POPF or POPF grade. However, in the overall patient analysis we observed a significant reduction of the entire pancreas over time. In fact, thickness decreased 0.4 mm/month, length 1.2 mm/month and volume 1.17 cm3/month over the PO. The impact of age, POPF, type of anastomosis, surgical technique and PO follow-up (time) was evaluated in a multivariate analysis using the general linear model, but only PO follow-up had a significant influence on the final model (p < 0.001). A significant reduction on pancreatic parenchyma (thickness, length and volume) occurs after PD with no significant differences between patients with or without POPF.

Surgical approach to solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the proximal pancreas: minimally invasive vs. open

BackgroundSolid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPN) of the pancreas are rare pancreatic neoplasms where complete resection is the cornerstone in management. It has been demonstrated in previous studies that minimally invasive surgical approaches are effective management options in treating SPNs of the distal pancreas. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of minimally invasive surgery in treating SPNs of the uncinate, head, and neck of the pancreas.MethodsData from 2005 to 2017 at Severance Hospital of the Yonsei University Health systems in Seoul, South Korea, were retrospectively collected for 25 patients who were diagnosed with SPN of the uncinate, head, and neck of the pancreas and who underwent curative resection. Three groups of patients were considered, depending on the year of surgery, in order to determine trends in the surgical management of SPN. The patients were also divided into two groups corresponding to the type of operation done (minimally invasive surgery vs. open surgery). Perioperative patient data, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), tumor size, and operation done, were compared and analyzed statistically. Long-term nutritional effects were measured using the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) scoring system.ResultsThere were no statistically significant differences in age, gender, BMI, symptomatic presentation, operation type, tumor size, and tumor stage between the three time periods. In comparing between minimally invasive and open surgery, there were no statistically significant differences in age, gender, symptomatic presentation, BMI, tumor size, preoperative stage, type of operation, operation time, pancreatic duct size, post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) grade, death associated with disease, recurrence, pathological parameters, and change in CONUT score. There was a significant difference in tumor size (4.5 ± 1.8 vs. 2.6 ± 1.0 cm, p = 0.004), blood loss (664.2 ± 512.4 vs. 277.7 ± 250.8 mL, p = 0.024), need to transfuse (33% vs. 0%, p = 0.023), hospital length of stay (27.4 ± 15.3 vs. 11.5 ± 5.3 days, p = 0.002), and complication rate (75% vs. 30.8%, p = 0.027) between the two groups.ConclusionsIn appropriately selected patients with SPNs of the uncinate, head, and neck of the pancreas, a minimally invasive surgical approach offers at least equal oncologic and nutritional outcomes, while demonstrating decreased complications and decreased hospital length of stay compared with that of an open surgical approach.

Safety and Feasibility of Robotic Reduced-Port Distal Pancreatectomy: a Multicenter Experience of a Novel Technique

BackgroundA reduced-port approach including single-site surgery has been used for distal pancreatectomy. However, triangulation is difficult in reduced-port laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy, and instrument crowding, and collision may occur, so this approach has not been widely used. Recently, an innovative technique for distal pancreatectomy using a robotic single-site surgical system was introduced. Herein, we evaluate the safety and feasibility of this technique. MethodsTwenty-seven patients with a pancreatic tail mass underwent robotic single-site plus one-port distal pancreatectomy at six centers. We collected clinicopathologic data and evaluated the short-term perioperative outcomes of robotic single-site plus one-port distal pancreatectomy. ResultsWe evaluated 26 patients who underwent robotic single-site plus one-port distal pancreatectomy excluding one patient who needed more ports because of fatty abdomen. The mean age and body mass index were 47.3 years (range 21–74) and 22.6 kg/m2 (range 15.8–28.8), respectively. The most common pathologic diagnosis was solid papillary neoplasm followed by a neuroendocrine tumor. The mean operating time was 201 min. The mean length of hospital stay after surgery was 7 days (range 4–10). The rate of spleen preservation was 34.6% (9/26). Six patients had postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) grade A, and no patients had POPF grade B or C. Only one patient had class II morbidity. ConclusionRobotic single-site plus one-port distal pancreatectomy is safe and feasible in terms of short-term outcomes. This technique could be performed in select cases to expand the surgical boundaries of the robotic single-site platform. Further studies are needed with more cases to investigate long-term outcomes.

Clinical validation of scoring systems of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy: applicability to Eastern cohorts?

Although several prediction models for the occurrence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) exist, all were established using Western cohorts. Large-scale external validation studies in Eastern cohorts that consider demographic variables including lower body mass index (BMI) are scarce. The purpose of this study was to externally validate POPF prediction models using nationwide large-scale Korean cohorts. Nine tertiary university hospitals in the Republic of Korea participated. Patients' preoperative characteristics, intraoperative factors, and pathologic findings were evaluated. POPF grades were determined according to the 2016 International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery definition. Three POPF risk models (Callery, Roberts, and Mungroop) were selected for external validation. A total of 1,898 PD patients were enrolled. A non-pancreatic disease diagnosis [hazard ratio (HR), 1.856; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.223-2.817; P=0.004), higher preoperative BMI (HR, 1.069; 95% CI, 1.019-1.121; P=0.006), and soft pancreatic texture (HR, 1.859; 95% CI, 1.264-2.735; P=0.002) were independent risk factors for clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values were 0.61, 0.64, and 0.63 on the Callery, Roberts, and Mungroop models, respectively; all were lower than those published in each external validation study. Western POPF prediction models performed less well when applied to Korean cohorts. Thus, a large-scale Eastern-specific and externally validated POPF prediction model is needed.

The inflammatory response after laparoscopic and open pancreatoduodenectomy and the association with complications in a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BackgroundThe systemic inflammatory response seen after surgery seems to be related to postoperative complications. A reduction of the inflammatory response through minimally invasive surgery might therefore be the mechanism via which postoperative outcome could be improved. The aim of this study was to investigate if postoperative inflammatory markers differed between laparoscopic (LPD) and open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) and if there was a relationship between inflammatory markers and the occurrence of postoperative complications. MethodsA side study of the multicenter randomized controlled LEOPARD-2 trial comparing LPD to OPD was performed. Area under the curve (AUC) for plasma inflammatory markers, including interleukin (IL-) 6, IL-8 and C reactive protein (CRP) levels, were determined during the first 96 postoperative hours and compared between LPD and OPD, Clavien-Dindo ≥ III complications, and postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) grade B/C. ResultsOverall, 38 patients were included (18 LPD and 20 OPD). The median AUC of IL-6 was 627 (195–1378) after LPD vs. 338 (175–694)pg/mL after OPD, (p = 0.114). The AUC of IL-8 and CRP were comparable. IL-6 levels were higher in patients with a Clavien-Dindo ≥ III complication (634[309–1489] vs. 297 [171–680], p = 0.034) and POPF grade B/C (994 [534–3265] vs. 334 [173–704], p = 0.003). In patients with a POPF grade B/C, IL-6 levels tended to be higher after LPD, as compared to OPD (3533[IQR 1133–3533] vs. 715[IQR 39–1658], p = 0.053). ConclusionLPD, as compared to OPD, did not reduce the postoperative inflammatory response. IL-6 levels were associated with postoperative complications and pancreatic fistula.