Postoperative Analgesia Research Articles

Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia and postpartum analgesia in Japan: A cross-sectional study.

This study aims to investigate the clinical practice of physicians working in obstetric setting toward postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery (CD) with neuraxial anesthesia. We conducted this online survey to all active members of the Japan Society of Obstetric Anesthesiology and Perinatology (JSOAP), where leads academic society in obstetric anesthesia in Japan. The questionnaire was developed using the Delphi method. The survey included questions about routine practices for PONV prevention, the use of neuraxial opioids, optimal practices, and perceived obstacles. The email sent three times every 2 weeks as a reminder. A total of 1046 e-mails were sent, and 307 JSOAP members responded to the survey (29.3%). More than half of responders (62.7%) used neuraxial opioids with intrathecal morphine being the most frequent. They had a higher rate of multimodal PONV prophylaxis compared with who did not use neuraxial opioids for postoperative analgesia (19.9% vs 6.7%). Metoclopramide was the commonest medication for PONV prevention, and there was a significant difference in the use of 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor antagonists (19.9% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.012). We observed that 80% of physicians reported the routine administration of prophylaxis for PONV for CD. Among these, 20% indicated the use of two or more agents. Conversely, in the cohort not administering neuraxial opioids, only 6.7% reported the use of two or more agents. The online survey showed that the physicians using neuraxial opioids for CD had a higher proportion of multimodal PONV management involving two or more agents.

Comparing subjective quality of recovery between remimazolam- and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia for surgical procedures: a meta-analysis

BackgroundRemimazolam is a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine that has been recently introduced as an alternative to propofol for general anesthesia. While both agents have been compared in terms of safety and efficacy, their relative effects on postoperative quality of recovery (QoR) remain unclear. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of remimazolam and propofol on subjective QoR in surgical patients who underwent general anesthesia.MethodsMedline, Embase, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to May 28, 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials comparing remimazolam and propofol in terms of postoperative QoR. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2) was used to assess study quality. QoR score on postoperative day (POD) 1 (primary outcome), QoR scores on PODs 2–3, QoR dimensions, time to loss of consciousness, other recovery characteristics, and rescue analgesia requirement were evaluated using random-effects meta-analyses.ResultsThis meta-analysis included 13 studies published between 2022 and 2024 involving 1,418 patients. QoR was evaluated using either the QoR-15 (10 studies) or QoR-40 (3 studies) questionnaire. The pooled results indicated no significant difference in the QoR scores on POD 1 (standardized mean difference: 0.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: − 0.20, 0.23, P = 0.88, I2 = 73%) and PODs 2–3 between remimazolam and propofol. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed in QoR dimensions, length of postanesthesia care unit (PACU) stay, and time to extubation as well as in the risks of agitation and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Patients administered remimazolam exhibited slower anesthetic induction (mean difference (MD): 32.27 s) but faster recovery of consciousness (MD: − 1.60 min) than those administered propofol. Moreover, remimazolam was associated with a lower risk of rescue analgesia requirement in the PACU (risk ratio: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.43, 0.89, P = 0.009, I2 = 0%) but not in the ward.ConclusionRemimazolam is a potential alternative to propofol for general anesthesia as it offers similar QoR to the latter and has advantages in terms of consciousness recovery and immediate postoperative analgesia requirement.

A Comparative Study Between Femoral Nerve Block and Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Post-Operative Analgesia in Femur Fracture Fixation

Introduction: Femur fractures and their surgical fixations are common. Adequate postoperative pain relief is mandatory as it facilitates rapid recovery by enhancing early ambulation and mitigating stress response. This is barely achievable with conventional pain control methods. Ultrasound-guided regional blocks like femoral nerve block and supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block are simple yet promising techniques for postoperative analgesia in femur fractures. Aims: To compare post-operative analgesia duration and satisfaction attained between the patients receiving ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block with, those receiving ultrasound-guided supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block, after femur fracture fixation. Methods: Seventy-four patients, aged 16−85 years, of either sex, ASA I−II, who underwent femur fracture surgical fixations under spinal anesthesia, were randomly divided into two equal groups: groups 1 and group 2. Postoperatively, Group 1 (n= 37) received a femoral nerve block with 15 ml 2.5% bupivacaine whereas Group 2 (n = 37) received a supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block with 30 ml 2.5% bupivacaine. Duration of analgesia, patients' level of satisfaction, visual analogue scale scores, and hemodynamic parameters at different time intervals were recorded in the first 24 hours postoperatively and compared. Results: The demographic profiles between the two groups were comparable. Group 2 had a significantly longer duration of analgesia than Group 1, with the means 795.14 vs 538.65 minutes respectively, and a P value of .002. Although group 1 patients had predominantly 3 and 4 levels of satisfaction whereas group 2 had 4 and 5, there was no statistically significant difference in patients’ level of satisfaction between the groups (P=.249). Conclusion: Supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block provides a longer duration of analgesia than femoral nerve block in femur fracture fixation. The level of satisfaction in both groups is high and comparable.

Prospective case-control study on pain intensity after the use of promethazine in patients undergoing videothoracoscopy.

Effective and secure pain management following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is crucial for rapid postoperative recovery. This study evaluated analgesic and sedative effects of sufentanil and promethazine in patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) post-thoracic surgery, along with potential adverse reactions. In this prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, clinical study, 60 patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists status I-III) undergoing VATS were enrolled. The patients were randomized into experimental (Group P) or control (Group C) groups. PCIA was administered post-general anesthesia using a double-blind method. Group P received sufentanil (3 μg/kg) + promethazine (1 mg/kg) + 0.9% sodium chloride solution (100 mL total), while Group C received sufentanil (3 μg/kg) + 0.9% sodium chloride solution (100 mL total). PCIA settings included a 1-mL bolus and 15-min locking time. The primary outcomes were the visual analog scale (VAS) at rest and during coughing and sedation (Ramsay) scores at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h. The secondary outcomes were rescue drug use rate, hemodynamic parameters (mean arterial pressure and heart rate), percutaneous oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, and occurrence of adverse reactions. Group P exhibited lower resting and coughing VAS scores at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h, plus decreased incidence of nausea and vomiting within 48 h post-surgery compared with Group C (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in pruritus, sedation (Ramsay) scores, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, or respiratory rate between the two groups (p > 0.05). The combination of sufentanil and promethazine for postoperative intravenous analgesia could effectively reduce adverse effects such as nausea and vomiting, contributing to postoperative pain relief.

Liposomal Bupivacaine in Managing Postoperative Pain Following Shoulder Surgery

To optimize postoperative analgesia following shoulder surgery, current literature recommends multimodal approaches, including the use of regional liposomal bupivacaine (LB), a long-acting local anesthetic. The liposomal formulation of bupivacaine affords it a longer duration of action without a substantial peak plasma concentration; this combined with 3% free bupivacaine provides patients with substantial, prolonged postoperative analgesia following shoulder surgery. The use of LB as part of a multimodal approach to postoperative pain results in diminished use of opioids, reduced pain, and decreased length of hospitalization. Current literature supports these effects following a wide variety of shoulder procedures; however, some studies describe no benefit and list drawbacks including higher costs when electing to use LB instead of comparable, more affordable treatment modalities. In the interest of reducing the number of opioid prescriptions following orthopedic procedures, it is imperative to continue investigating the efficacy of LB as an opioid-sparing pain reducer. Recent literature suggests certain patient populations may be less suitable for implementing this treatment modality; namely those with a history of opioid use, prior surgeries, substantial systemic illness, and existing cardiopulmonary compromise. Patient demographics may be an additional consideration when determining the potential utility of LB to optimize analgesia after shoulder surgery.

Postoperative epidural analgesia and outcomes following pediatric bilateral lung and heart-lung transplantation: a retrospective observational study

BackgroundThe value of epidural analgesia in pediatric patients having heart and lung transplant surgery is unknown. We aimed to characterize various quality outcomes in patients who did and did not...

Effects of anterior quadratus lumborum block versus erector spinae plane block on postoperative acute pain in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective, observational study

BackgroundThe study aimed to compare the pain-relieving effectiveness of anterior quadratus lumborum block (QLB3) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB), both of which have been documented to provide relief during abdominal surgery.MethodsThis prospective observational study, conducted between February and July 2023, included 96 patients who had undergone percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Patients were divided into three groups: QLB3, ESPB, and control (no block) and received the corresponding nerve block in the preanesthetic room for regional block. Cumulative morphine consumption during the initial 24 h after PCNL, numerical rating scale resting/movement scores, intraoperative remifentanil usage, rescue analgesic requirements, time when the first analgesic was requested, and postoperative nausea and vomiting scores were documented and compared between the groups.ResultsTotal median morphine consumption in the first 24 h postoperatively was similar in the QLB3 and ESPB groups but higher in the control group (QLB3, 7 mg [(Q1-Q3) 7–8.5]; ESPB, 8 mg [6.5–9]; control, 12.5 [10–17]; P < 0.001). Similarly, median intraoperative remifentanil consumption did not differ between the block groups but was higher in the control group (QLB3, 1082 µg [IQR 805.5–1292.7]; ESPB, 1278 µg [940.2–1297.5]; control, 1561 µg [1315–2068]; P < 0.001). The number of patients receiving rescue analgesic medication was similar in the block groups but higher in the control group (QLB3, n = 9 [30%]; ESPB, n = 14 [46.7%]; control, n = 21 [70%]; P = 0.008).ConclusionsQLB3 and ESPB were adequate and comparable in providing postoperative analgesia as part of multimodal analgesia after PCNL.Trial registrationThe study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT05822492).

Immunological effects of post-operative epidural analgesia versus oral opioids in VATS.

Anaesthetic choices in cancer surgery, including the use of epidural analgesia, may affect immune function during the perioperative period and might play an important role in subsequent cancer spread and recurrence. This was a prospective, randomised, controlled, double-blinded, single-centre study allocating patients scheduled for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy to post-operative pain management using either thoracic epidural analgesia or oral morphine. We compared pre-, per-, and post-operative plasma levels of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, IL-12, and interferon (IFN)-γ using regression analysis, and conducted a two-year survival follow-up. A total of 66 patients were randomised. Fifty-six received the allocated treatment and were analysed. None of the investigated cytokines exhibited significant between-group differences in plasma concentrations when adjusted for the chosen covariates (p ≥ 0.204). A two-year follow-up showed no difference in survival between the two groups (p = 0.5). Our study found no differences in the impact on the innate, non-specific immune system related to epidural analgesia for pain management in VATS. The Danish Cancer Society (R150-A10139). Oberstinde Kirsten Jensa la Cours Mindelegat (JSP-25076). University of Southern Denmark, Region of Southern Denmark and Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Odense University Hospital. NCT02359175 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Postoperative Feeding in Cleft Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Postoperative feeding is crucial for the recovery of children after cleft surgery. The literature outlines diverse feeding methods with varying recommendations on the duration of non-nipple feeding postsurgery. This study aims to explore reported postoperative feeding modalities for infants undergoing primary cleft lip/palate repair, concentrating on their influence on feeding improvement and complication reduction. PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were queried for original English articles without any date restrictions. This review was conducted in accordance with the 2020 PRISMA. The MINORS criteria was used to assess quality of studies. Of 696 abstracts, 9 full-text articles were included, consisting of 459 children with cleft lip (n = 221) & cleft lip/palate (n = 238). Feeding modalities included bottle, breastfeeding, spoon, syringe, and nasogastric tube. Two studies found a significant increase in weight with breastfeeding compared to spoon or cup. Two studies found partial wound dehiscence using spoons, and two studies reported dehiscence using bottles. Post-palatoplasty, two studies showed a decrease in hospital stay in infants breastfed (2.1 & 5.8 days) vs spoon-fed (6 days). Analgesia was reduced in the breastfed group vs spoon/nasogastric tube. This review highlights the importance of postoperative feeding in the recovery of infants with cleft lip/palate. Evidence suggests that breastfeeding may offer advantages in terms of weight gain and reduced hospital stay, while potentially minimizing the need for postoperative analgesia. The limited number of studies and variability in their outcomes underscore the need for further research to establish evidence-based guidelines for postoperative feeding.

Comparative Analysis of Intrathecal Bupivacaine With Fentanyl Versus Intrathecal Bupivacaine With Midazolam in Lower Abdominal and Lower Limb Surgeries.

Many different adjuvants are added intrathecally along with local anaesthetics to prolong intraoperative and postoperative analgesia. Hence, this study aimed to compare intrathecal bupivacaine with fentanyl and bupivacaine with midazolam in lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries. Following permission from the Hospital Ethical Committee (Research Protocol No.: IESC/PGS/2022/143), the study was conducted on a sample of 60 patients, divided into two groups, Group F and Group M, with 30 patients each, representing the American Society of Anaesthesiologist's (ASA) grades I and II. The patients were between the ages of 18 and 60 and featured both males and females, scheduled to undergo elective surgical procedures on the lower abdomen and lower limbs via spinal anaesthesia. Group "F": 3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine hydrochloride with 0.5 ml (25 mcg) of fentanyl (preservative-free) intrathecally. Group "M": 3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine hydrochloride with 0.5 ml (2.5 mg) of midazolam (preservative-free) intrathecally. The primary aim was to study the onset of motor and sensory block and duration of analgesia with the addition of midazolam or fentanyl to 0.5% heavy bupivacaine in the sub-arachnoid block. A secondary aim was to evaluate the quality of anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia, determine the haemodynamic stability in the intraoperative and postoperative period in the two study groups, andobserve any adverse effects of study drugs. Group F exhibited a substantially longer duration for both sensory (211.5 vs. 154.4 min) and motor blockade (269.8 vs. 214.6 min) compared to Group M, as well as a rapid onset time for both sensory (2.6 vs. 3.3 min) and motor blockade (3.1 vs. 3.9 min). Also, Group F had a significantly longer duration of effective analgesia compared to Group M (266 ± 15.9 vs. 197.6 ± 13.7 minutes). The addition of 0.5 ml (2.5 mg) Midazolam with 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine intrathecally prolonged the duration of anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia; however, fentanyl 0.5 ml (25 mcg) has a more prolonged duration of intraoperative and postoperative analgesia.

Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block with and without Dexamethasone as Local Anaesthetics

Background: Brachial plexus block is good alternative to general anesthesia for upper limb surgery. This avoids the unwanted effect of anesthetic drugs used during general anesthesia and the stress of upper airway instrumentation. Peripheral nerve blocks can be used for anesthesia, postoperative analgesia, diagnosis and treatment of chronic pain disorders. This study was carried out to compare onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade and duration of postoperative analgesia on addition of dexamethasone to local anestheic and local anesthetic alone in supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Methods: In this prospective randomized, controlled, double blinded study which was conducted at Department of Anesthesia, 250 Beded Hospital, Lalmonirhat, Rangpur, Bangladesh from January to June 2023. We included 70 ASA I &amp; II patients who were aged between 18 years &amp; 60 years, underwent elective upper limb surgeries. They were divided into two equal groups. Group 1 (cases) who received 15 milliliter of 2% lignocaine with adrenaline and 15 milliliter of 0.5% bupivacaine + dexamethasone 8mg (2ml). Group 2 (controls) who received 15 milliliter of 2% lignocaine with adrenaline and 15 milliliter of 0.5% bupivacaine + 0.9% normal saline (2ml). We observed the Onset of sensory and motor blockade, duration of sensory and motor blockade and postoperative analgesia between the two groups. Results: In this study of patients according to their age and weight. 37.26±15.55 years were mean age in group 1 and in group 2 it was 36.56±16.86 with p value being 0.8678. 58.466± 3.9642 kg was the mean weight in group 1 and in group 2 it was 60.4±4.95 kg with p value of 0.1002. So both the groups were comparable in terms of age and weight. In this study out of 70 patients, group1 consisted of 68.6% males whereas there were 60% in group 2 and group 1consisted of 31.4% of females and 40% in group2, hence males’ outnumbered females in both the groups. The mean duration of surgery in group 1 was 50±19.95 minutes and in group 2 were 46.6±15.55 minutes with p value of 0.4646. There was no statistical difference between both the groups. The onset of sensory blockade was within 7.3 min in group 1. In group 2 the onset of sensory blockade was 13.66 minutes. The onset of motor blockade was within 3.93 min in group 1. In group 2 the onset of motor blockade was 18.66 min. The duration of intra operative analgesia was 654.33 minutes in group 1. In group 2 the duration of intra operative analgesia was 292.6 minutes. The duration of post-operative analgesia was 815±13.57 minutes in group 1. The duration of post-operative analgesia in group 2 was 393.8±42.88 minutes. There were no complications in both the groups in intra operative period and post-operative period. Conclusion: Dexamethasone, when added to 15 millilitre of 0.5% bupivacaine and 15 millilitre of 2% lignocaine plus adrenaline, very effectively enhances the onset of sensory and motor blockade. It dramatically prolongs the duration of sensory and motor blockade and duration of analgesia. There were no untoward side effects with the use of dexamethasone as an additive in the brachial plexus block.

Comparative Effectiveness of Regional Anesthesia and Nerve Block Techniques in Reducing Chronic Post-Surgical Pain in Adults Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Surgery: A Systematic Review

Background: This study to show about comparative effectiveness of regional anesthesia and nerve block techniques in reducing chronic post-surgical pain in adults undergoing inguinal hernia surgery. Methods: By the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020, this study was able to show that it met all of the requirements. Result: Eight publications were found to be directly related to our ongoing systematic examination after a rigorous three-level screening approach. Subsequently, a comprehensive analysis of the complete text was conducted, and additional scrutiny was given to these articles. Conclusion: CPSP is a multifactorial and complex condition that can significantly affect the quality of life of patients undergoing surgery. General anesthesia plus ilioinguinal nerve block is better than spinal anesthesia (SA) regarding postoperative analgesia, time to mobilization and discharge, side-effect profile and satisfaction experienced by the patients. Regional block anesthesia (RBA) is superior to conventional spinal anesthesia (CSA) for pain relief at 24 hours post-surgery.

Comparative Analysis of Oral Clonidine Versus Oral Gabapentin on Subarachnoid Block Duration and Postoperative Analgesic Needs.

Pain, an inherently subjective experience, plays a pivotal role in the body's defence mechanism by signalling tissue damage or potential harm. Thus, optimal postoperative pain management is a cornerstone of modern surgical practice, essential for improving recovery outcomes and overall patient well-being. In this study, a total of 60 patients were randomly assigned to two groups of 30 each: Group C (clonidine) and Group G (gabapentin). Group C received oral clonidine 100 mcg and Group G received oral gabapentin600 mg one hour prior to the subarachnoid block. Duration of sensory and motor block, hemodynamic parameters, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, time to rescue analgesia and any side effect of both drugs were assessed in both groups. The duration of motor and sensory blockade, as well as intraoperative hemodynamics and respiratory rates, were comparable between the two groups. Group G exhibited significantly lower VAS scores from 150 minutes postoperatively up to 12 hours (p < 0.001). Additionally, Group G experienced longer duration of postoperative analgesia (16.8±3.9 hours) compared to Group C (9.27±1.7 hours). About 26.6% of the patients in Group C and 6.7% of the patients in Group G presented with postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Oral gabapentin at a dosage of 600 mg demonstrates superior efficacy as a premedication compared to oral clonidine 100 mcg for patients undergoing lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries under spinal anesthesia. Group G demonstrated extended postoperative analgesia, lower VASscores, and a reduced incidence of PONV, indicating its superiority over clonidine as an analgesic adjunct.

Comparison of postoperative analgesia by thoracoscopic-guided thoracic paravertebral block and thoracoscopic-guided intercostal nerve block in uniportal video-asssited thoracic surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial

BackgroundThoracoscopic-guided thoracic paravertebral nerve block (TG-TPVB) and thoracoscopic-guided intercostal nerve block (TG-INB) are two postoperative analgesia technology for thoracic surgery. This study aims to compared the analgesic effect of TG-TPVB and TG-INB after uniportal video-asssited thoracic surgery (UniVATS).MethodsFifty-eight patients were randomly allocated to the TG-TPVB group and the TG-INB group. The surgical time of nerve block, the visual analog scale (VAS) scores, the consumption of sufentanil and the number of patient-controlled intravenous analgesic (PCIA) presses within 24 h after surgery, the incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe VAS scores were significantly lower during rest and coughing at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h in the TG-TPVB group than in the TG-INB group (P < 0.05). The consumption of sufentanil and the number of PCIA presses within 24 h after surgery were significantly lower in the TG-TPVB group than in the TG-INB group (P < 0.001).The surgical time of nerve block was significantly shorter in the TG-TPVB group than in the TG-INB group (P < 0.001). The incidence of bleeding at the puncture point was lower in the TG-TPVB group than that in the TG-INB group (P < 0.05).ConclusionTG-TPVB demonstrated superior acute pain relieve after uniVATS, shorter surgical time and non-inferior adverse effects than TG-INB.

Comparing the effects of intrathecal and intra-articular magnesium sulfate and fentanyl on pain after knee arthroscopy; double-blind clinical trial

Abstract Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of intrathecal and intra-articular magnesium sulfate (IA-Mg) and fentanyl on pain after knee arthroscopy (KA). Materials and Methods: This double-blind clinical trial was conducted in 2022–2023. One hundred and forty candidates for KA were randomly allocated to four groups, namely intrathecal magnesium sulfate, IA-Mg, intrathecal fentanyl (IT-F), and intra-articular fentanyl. A medical intern used a 0–10 visual analog scale to assess participants’ post-KA pain at recovery and 1, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h after KA. Participants with a pain score of more than 4 were provided with intravenous pethidine 25 mg. Data were analyzed at a significance level of &lt; 0.05 and using the SPSS software (version 22.0). Results: No significant difference was found among the groups respecting participants’ arterial oxygen saturation, heart rate, blood pressure, and KA duration (P &gt; 0.05). The mean score of pain significantly increased in all study groups (P &lt; 0.05) and the mean score of pain in the IA-Mg group was significantly less than the other groups (P = 0.001). Respecting postoperative complications, only six cases from the IT-F group experienced pruritus (P = 0.001). Conclusion: IA-Mg can significantly reduce post-KA pain and the need for postoperative analgesics. Therefore, it may be a safe and effective adjacent therapy for post-KA pain management.

The relationship between anesthesia, surgery and postoperative immune function in cancer patients: a review.

This review comprehensively examines the impact of anesthesia and surgical interventions on the immune function of cancer patients postoperatively. Recent studies have shown that surgery and its accompanying anesthesia management can significantly influence immune function in cancer patients, potentially affecting their prognosis. This review synthesizes clinical studies and basic research to summarize the specific effects of anesthesia methods, drugs, postoperative analgesia, intraoperative transfusion, surgical techniques, and trauma extent on the immune function of cancer patients post-surgery. Additionally, this review discusses optimization strategies based on current research, aiming to refine anesthesia and surgical management to maximize the preservation and enhancement of postoperative immune function in cancer patients, with the potential to improve clinical outcomes.

Analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided extraoral mandibular nerve block compared to intraoral conductive block of the inferior alveolar nerve after lower third molar alveolectomy: a clinical prospective study

BackgroundThe analgesia after lower third molar alveolectomy is based on the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) that have significant risks, and are contraindicated in the third trimester of pregnancy. Aiming to reduce NSAIDs use after this surgery, we quantified analgesic effects of ultrasound (US)-guided extraoral mandibular nerve block.MethodsThirty-six patients were equally allocated to the experimental or control group, based on their willingness to receive experimental US-guided extraoral mandibular nerve block for postoperative analgesia. The experimental block applied prior to lower third molar alveolectomy, was followed by standard intraoral inferior alveolar nerve block. In the control group, patients received only intraoral block of inferior alveolar nerve. All patients reported pain level (visual analogue scale, VAS) right after the application of blocks. The next day, patients reported duration of pain-free time and the use of analgesic.ResultsThe US-guided extraoral mandibular nerve block prolonged the pain-free time to 8 h (vs. 4 in control group, P < 0.001) and reduced NSAIDs use (12 patients needed analgesic in experimental vs. 17 patients in control group, P = 0.038). The application of experimental block was less painful (VAS = 2) than the application of intraoral inferior alveolar nerve block (VAS = 4, P = 0.011). In 8/18 patients in the experimental group US-guided extraoral mandibular nerve block solely achieved adequate surgical anesthesia.ConclusionUS-guided extraoral mandibular nerve block prolonged pain-free period and reduced the use of NSAIDs after lower third molar alveolectomy, thus proving to be successful analgesia method for this dental surgery.Clinical trial registrationhttps://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06009302, identification number: NCT06009302, date of registration: 18/08/2023.

Comparing postoperative pain relief: ketorolac and nasocalcin spray versus lidocaine and nasocalcin spray in abdominal surgery patients

Objectives: Postoperative pain management is critical for patient recovery after abdominal surgery. This study compared intravenous lidocaine and ketorolac for reducing postoperative pain and opioid use, along with Nasocalcin nasal spray. Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 58 abdominal surgery patients were allocated to receive either intravenous lidocaine plus Nasocalcin spray (n=29) or intravenous ketorolac plus Nasocalcin spray (n=29) before surgery. Pain intensity (visual analog scale) and postoperative opioid consumption were assessed at 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery. Results: Patients receiving ketorolac plus Nasocalcin spray reported significantly lower pain scores at all time points compared to lidocaine plus Nasocalcin (P&lt;0.001). Average 24-hour pain scores were 4.5 with ketorolac versus 5.1 with lidocaine. Mean opioid consumption was also lower in the ketorolac group (31.9 mg) versus the lidocaine group (43.9 mg, P&lt;0.001). Conclusion: Preoperative ketorolac plus Nasocalcin nasal spray resulted in superior pain relief and less opioid use compared to lidocaine plus Nasocalcin after abdominal surgery. Ketorolac may be a more effective analgesic option, while Nasocalcin spray is a safe adjunct. These findings can inform clinical practice for optimizing postoperative analgesia.

The effectiveness and outcomes of epidural analgesia in patients undergoing open liver resection: a propensity score matching analysis

BackgroundOpen liver resection necessitates a substantial upper abdominal inverted-L incision, resulting in severe pain and compromising patient recovery. Despite the efficacy of epidural analgesia in providing adequate postoperative analgesia, the potential epidural-related adverse effects should be carefully considered. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of continuous epidural analgesia and intravenous analgesia in open liver resection.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted, collecting data from patients who underwent open liver resection between 2007 and 2017. Propensity score matching was implemented to mitigate confounding variables, with patients being matched in a 1:1 ratio based on propensity scores. The primary outcome was the comparison of postoperative morphine consumption at 24, 48, and 72 hours between the two groups. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, postoperative outcomes, and epidural-related adverse effects.ResultsA total of 612 patients were included, and after matching, there were 204 patients in each group. Opioid consumption at 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively was statistically lower in the epidural analgesia group compared to the intravenous analgesia group (p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in pain scores (p = 0.422). Additionally, perioperative hypotension requiring treatment, as well as nausea and vomiting, were significantly higher in the epidural analgesia group compared to the intravenous analgesia group (p < 0.001).ConclusionsEpidural analgesia is superior to intravenous morphine in terms of reducing postoperative opioid consumption within the initial 72 h after open liver resection. Nevertheless, perioperative hypotension, which necessitates management, should be approached with consideration and vigilance.Trial registrationThe study was registered in the Clinical Trials Registry at www.clinicaltrials.gov/, NCT number: NCT06301932.

Assessing the Efficacy of Thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbosacral Spine Surgery: A Prospective Quasi-experimental Study.

Background and aims Optimal postoperative care and analgesia are the key factors in the management of cases of lumbosacral spine surgery. The erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a recently evolving entity and has a dynamic role in postoperative pain management. However, its role in the management of pain in lumber spinal surgeries is still not clear, and the literature remains anecdotal. Therefore, we planned to study the efficacy of ultrasound-guided preoperative ESP block at the T12 level using levobupivacaine for perioperative analgesia in lumbosacral spine surgeries. Methods A total of 60 patients scheduled for elective or emergency lumbosacral spine surgery were divided into two groups - the GA group received standard general anesthesia (GA)and the GA+ESP group received standard general anesthesia along with ultra-sound guided ESP block at the T12 level with a bilateral injection of20 ml 0.25% levobupivacaine. Perioperative analgesia was assessed by total intra-operative fentanyl dose and frequency, intra-operative hemodynamic parameters, post-operative numeric rating scale (NRS) scores, time of first systemic rescue analgesia, tramadol usage, mobilization day, and hospital stay duration. Results Intraoperative fentanyl sparing was observed in 83% of the GA+ESP group compared to 33% in the GA group. Postoperative tramadol sparing was observed in 80% of the GA+ESP group compared to 26.7% of the GA group. Twenty-four-hour postoperative NRS scores >3/10 were observed in 20% of the GA+ ESP group compared to 73.3% of the GA group. Conclusion In this study, superior perioperative analgesia, opioid-sparing effect, and decreased requirement of postoperative rescue analgesia were observed with ESP block.