Across academy, colleges and schools of pharmacy are scrambling to reimagine, recreate, modify, or completely overhaul their doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) degree curricula. This push to change has been termed in a variety of ways including but not limited to educational renaissance, reform, transformation, and/or reengineering. (1) Several factors have been implicated as drivers of these sometimes minor but often major changes to including influence of rapidly evolving technologic advances, changes to Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education standards for accreditation of PharmD programs, and evolutions in secondary and undergraduate education. Pharmacy is certainly not only health care profession dealing with change and curricular disruption. Many medical schools are moving to three-year accelerated programs and grappling with ever expanding bodies of medical research, integration of clinical and basic sciences, and need to ensure that graduates have not only knowledge but also practical skill set necessary for next stage of training or practice. Nursing and physical therapy programs have recently introduced clinical doctorates as either elective post-graduate options or entry-level degrees. Health care colleges across spectrum are also managing mandates to increase both quantity and quality of interprofessional education within respective curricula. In 1910 Abraham Flexner first proposed some of most widespread and pervasive changes to health care education when he argued that medicine should more strictly adhere to scientific principles and standards in both research and teaching. (2) Interestingly, Flexner was not a physician, researcher, or medical educator but rather product of a liberal arts education. He was born in Kentucky where he founded and operated a college preparatory school before he became engaged with Carnegie Foundation. Despite a lack of health care training, Flexner was able to alter course of medical education well beyond his 364-page 1910 report. Flexner's reach was not limited to medicine. In as early as 1908, he criticized common teaching practices in his book The American College. He made a profound and perhaps foretelling statement when he wrote, lectures enabled colleges to handle cheaply by wholesale a large body of students that would be otherwise unmanageable and thus give lecturer time for research. (3) At my home institution, we have been engaged in a complete overhaul of our own PharmD We are in midst of launching second semester of this reenvisioned degree program. As class of 2020 continues to move from professional year to professional year, new courses will be taught and existing courses will become obsolete. In interim our faculty members are conducting two concurrent curricula often referred to as the old curriculum and the new curriculum. At this point in our trajectory, and after some serious reflection, it seems an appropriate time to take inventory of what we (I) have and have not learned: * Change is hard. Hard for faculty, students, and staff. Despite common logic and opinion, it is even hard for those who are purposing or driving change. …