Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears Research Articles

Surgical Management of Massive Irreparable Cuff Tears/Management of Rotator Cuff Disease: Interpositional Graft for Irreparable Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears.

Increasingly, massive irreparable rotator cuff tears present a treatment challenge due to their high re-tear rates. The reparability of such tears depends on factors like tear size, the number of involved tendons, tendon retraction extent, muscular atrophy, fatty infiltration, and the presence or absence of arthritis. There are non-surgical and several surgical treatment options described each with their specific indications, contraindications, pros, and cons. Bridging reconstruction restores the superior rotator cuff tissue and arrests humeral head superior migration. The purpose of his review is to explore the existing literature on interpositional graft mechanics, indications, surgical technique, and clinical outcomes. It aims to understand how these parameters can facilitate the incorporation of bridging reconstruction using interpositional grafts into a surgeon's practice for managing massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. Interpositional grafts for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears can either be auto-, allo-, xenografts, or synthetic material and are best suited for patients who are relatively younger, no glenohumeral arthritis, and minimal to no fatty infiltration and muscle atrophy. Short to medium term outcome studies available report good functional, clinical, and radiological improvements with bridging reconstruction utilizing acellular dermal matrix allograft. Interpositional grafts for management of irreparable posterosuperior cuff tears provides improved clinical and radiological outcomes with minimal complications and thus a viable and valuable surgical technique for a shoulder surgeon's armamentarium.

Subacromial Surgery for Irreparable Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears

The irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tear describes a tear of the supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus tendon that is massive, contracted, and immobile in both the anterior–posterior and medial–lateral directions. Patients with an intact subscapularis and preserved forward elevation are challenging to treat because there is not a consensus treatment algorithm. For low-demand, elderly patients, several subacromial surgical options are available that can provide pain relief without the risks or burden of rehabilitation posed by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty or a complex soft-tissue reconstruction (e.g., superior capsular reconstruction, tendon transfer, bridging grafts). Debridement, more specifically the “smooth-and-move” procedure, offers a reliable outcome with documented improvements in pain and function at long-term follow-up. Similarly, the biodegradable subacromial balloon spacer (InSpace; Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI) has been shown to significantly improve pain and function in patients who are not responsive to nonoperative treatment. Disease progression with these options is possible, with a small percentage of patients progressing to rotator cuff arthropathy. Biologic tuberoplasty and bursal acromial reconstruction are conceptually similar to the balloon spacer but instead use biologic grafts to prevent bone-to-bone contact between the humeral head and the acromion. Although there is no single gold standard treatment, the variety of surgical techniques allows patients and surgeons to effectively manage these challenging situations.

Ultrasound and patient-reported outcomes of rotator cuff repair with new acellular human allograft at 6 months and 1 year post surgery

PurposeDetermine the effect of a novel acellular cannulated dermal allograft, on tendon-to-bone healing, retear rates, and clinical outcomes over a 12-month period. MethodsThis was a single surgeon prospective non-randomized case series. Patients with medium sized full-thickness superior and posterosuperior rotator cuff tears, as confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), were consented. Patients were excluded if they had fatty atrophy indicative of Goutallier grade III or IV. The allograft is a cannulated rectangular prism that has a 5-year shelf life, does not require prehydration, and does not need to be trimmed to size. Outcome metrics included ultrasound (US) assessment at 1 year as well as 6 month patient reported outcomes scores. Results31 patients consented and enrolled in this consecutive cohort series. 9 patients were excluded and statistical analysis was performed on the remaining 22 patients. There were 9 females and 13 males. The average age was 59.27 ± 7.48 years old. The average supraspinatus short axis measurement in males was 0.56 ± 0.12 cm and 0.52 ± 0.09 cm in females (p=0.44). The average supraspinatus long axis measurement in males was 0.61 ± 0.18 cm and 0.55 ± 0.14 cm in females (p=0.46). The average infraspinatus short axis measurement in males was 0.48 ± 0.10 cm and 0.50 ± 0.13 in females (p=0.74). The average infraspinatus long axis measurement in males was 0.44 ± 0.12 cm and 0.43 ± 0.08 cm in females (p=0.84). Of the 19 patients who completed baseline and 6 month PRO’s, 17 achieved the MCID for ASES and PROMIS UE 7a. Retear occurred in 2 cases. The remaining 20 cases have all demonstrated healing or fully healed repairs at their most recent clinic visits with no additional cases of retears. ConclusionThis study is the first to report the results of a novel acellular dermal allograft for Rotator Cuff Repair Augmentation. Satisfactory patient-reported outcome measures and robust tendon healing at 1 year as measured by ultrasound demonstrate the utility of a cannulated human acellular dermal allograft as a viable biologic augmentation device for Rotator Cuff repair.

Biomechanical Comparison Between Superior Capsular Reconstruction and Lower Trapezius Tendon Transfer in Irreparable Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears

Background: Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) and lower trapezius tendon transfer (LTT) have recently been used to manage irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears (PSRCTs). There has been a paucity of comparative biomechanical considerations between the 2 procedures. Purpose: To compare the glenohumeral stability and biomechanical properties between SCR and LTT in PSRCTs involving the entire infraspinatus tendon region. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were tested at 0°, 20°, and 40° of shoulder abduction. Maximum internal, external, and total humeral range of motion (ROM), superior translation of the humeral head, and subacromial contact characteristics were compared among 4 conditions: (1) intact rotator cuff, (2) PSRCTs involving the entire infraspinatus tendon region, (3) LTT using Achilles allograft (12 N and 24 N of loading), and (4) SCR using fascia lata allograft. Results: Although a decrease in total ROM was noted in LTT with 12 N compared with the tear condition, LTT with both 12 N and 24 N as well as SCR did not restrict total rotational ROM compared with the intact condition. LTT had decreased total ROM compared with tear condition at 20° of abduction (P = .042), while no significant decrease was confirmed at all abduction angles after SCR. SCR and LTT with 24 N decreased superior translation compared with the PSRCT condition at 0° and 20° of abduction (P < .037) but not significantly at 40° of abduction, whereas LTT with a 24-N load decreased glenohumeral superior translation at all abduction angles (P < .039). Both SCR and LTT decreased subacromial contact pressure compared with the tear condition (P < .014) at all abduction angles. SCR decreased subacromial contact pressure at 0° and 40° of abduction (P = .019 and P = .048, respectively) compared with LTT with 12 N of loading, while there was no difference between SCR and LTT with 24 N of loading in all abduction angles. SCR increased the contact area compared with the PSRCT condition at all abduction angles (P < .023), whereas LTT did not increase the contact area. Conclusion: SCR and LTT decreased glenohumeral superior translation and contact pressure compared with PSRCT conditions. The LTT was superior to SCR in terms of superior translation of the humeral head at a higher shoulder abduction angle, whereas the SCR showed more advantageous subacromial contact characteristics compared with LTT. Clinical Relevance: These biomechanical findings provide insights into these 2 fundamentally different procedures for the treatment of young and active patients with PSRCTs involving the entire infraspinatus tendon region.

Does timing influence rehabilitation outcomes in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with biceps rerouting? a prospective randomized study

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with biceps re-routing (ABR) has emerged as a reliable option for treating large, posterosuperior rotator cuff tears. This study aims to compare functional and structural outcomes of early versus delayed motion rehabilitation protocols following ABR. A total of 101 patients with semirigid, large, posterosuperior rotator cuff tears undergoing ABR were randomized into two groups: Group I (early motion) with 53 patients (34 females, 19 males) and Group II (delayed motion) with 48 patients (31 females, 17 males). In Group I, the mean age was 63.9 years (range, 46-79), and in Group II, it was 65.4 years (range, 43-78). The mean follow-up periods for Group I and Group II were 16.2 and 15.5 months, respectively. Preoperative and postoperative assessments were conducted at 3, 6, and 12 months, with structural integrity assessed with MRI at a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Statistical analyses were performed to compare outcomes between the two groups. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in VAS score (Group I: 4.0 to 1.6, Group II: 3.7 to 1.4, p = 0.501), UCLA shoulder score (Group I: 21.5 to 31.4, Group II: 22.4 to 30.6, p = 0.331), and acromiohumeral interval (Group I: 8.2 mm to 9.1 mm, Group II: 8.6 mm to 9.5 mm, p = 0.412), with no statistically or clinically meaningful differences. Active range of movements (ROM) were not significantly different between groups, except for active forward flexion at 3 months (Group I: 140.1º, Group II: 119.2º, p = 0.006), that was not shown to be translated clinically into differences in function or healing between the groups in this study. Notably, retear rates were similar between groups (Group I: 22.6%, Group II: 20.8%, p = 0.826). This study's findings reveal no clinically discernible differences in active range of motion at one-year follow-up between patients who underwent ABR for semirigid, large, posterosuperior rotator cuff tears and were assigned to either early or delayed motion protocols. Notably, the early motion group demonstrated a plateau in maximum ROM improvement as early as three months post-surgery. Based on these results, implementing an early motion protocol is recommended as an effective approach in the postoperative rehabilitation following ABR.

Lower Trapezius Transfer for Irreparable Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears.

Functionally irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears (FIRCT) represent a substantial source of morbidity for many patients. Several surgical options can be considered for the salvage of FICRTs. Transfer of the tendon of the lower trapezius to the greater tuberosity, originally described for surgical management of the paralytic shoulder, has emerged as an attractive option, particularly for patients with external rotation lag and those looking for strength restoration. The purpose of this publication is to review the indications, surgical technique, and reported outcomes of this procedure. Lower trapezius transfer (LTT) to the greater tuberosity in patients with irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears has been reported to be associated with satisfactory outcomes and low reoperation rates. It seems to be particularly effective in improving external rotation motion and strength, even when the teres minor is involved. In patients with a reparable infraspinatus, minimal fatty infiltration, and an intact teres minor, the outcome of LTT may be similar to that of superior capsule reconstruction (SCR), but LTT is more beneficial otherwise. The hospital cost of LTT has been reported to be less than the cost of SCR and equivalent to the cost of reverse arthroplasty. When reverse arthroplasty has been performed after a failed LTT, the outcome and complication rates do not seem to increase. LTT provides satisfactory outcomes for many patients with a posterosuperior FIRCT, particularly when they present preoperatively with an external rotation lag sign, involvement of the teres minor, or a desire to improve strength.

Subacromial Balloon Spacer for the Massive Irreparable Cuff Tear.

The purpose of the review is to provide an updated overview of a relatively novel but controversial surgical device (InSpace subacromial balloon, Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI) that can be readily incorporated into the armamentarium of the shoulder surgeon. The authors review the critical clinical and surgical decision-making aspects of InSpace. A recommended surgical technique and rehabilitation protocol are outlined. The authors present a nuanced view of the balloon spacer in the continuum of care of the irreparable rotator cuff tear. Within the last year, two Level I clinical trials have been published, and the data from these studies offer conflicting evidence regarding the utility of the subacromial balloon spacer. The current review contrasts these two recent studies and offers a framework by which the available evidence can be practically understood with respect to clinical decision-making. The literature currently supports a limited indication for use of InSpace: the elderly, low-demand patient with preserved active range of motion with an operatively irreparable, posterosuperior rotator cuff tear with an intact subscapularis. The InSpace subacromial balloon spacer is a simple device that can yield substantial improvements in clinical outcomes among a subset of patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears. InSpace is not a panacea for the complex,irreparable rotator cuff tear. Individualized decision-making is necessary in this diverse and challening patient population.

Lower Trapezius Tendon Transfer With Achilles Tendon Allograft: A Technique Video

Background: While small to medium rotator cuff tears demonstrate good outcomes with primary repair, large, irreparable cuff tears pose a significant clinical challenge with high re-tear rates and lower patient satisfaction. Tendon transfers are procedures that can restore motion and strength in the shoulder in the case of irreparable rotator cuff tears. Trapezius tendon transfers are suitable for large posterosuperior cuff tears as the lower trapezius has a vector of pull similar to that of the infraspinatus. Indications: Lower trapezius tendon transfers are indicated for young and active patients with irreparable posterior and posterosuperior rotator cuff tears causing significant weakness and loss of external rotation. Contraindications to the procedure include advanced osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint, advanced age, and deficiency of the subscapularis, deltoid, or trapezius muscles. Technique Description: Using a scapular incision, the trapezius muscle body and tendon are dissected from the scapular spine and mobilized. The plane of the infraspinatus into the glenohumeral joint is tunneled using blunt dissection, and the prepared allograft is passed through under arthroscopic visualization. The allograft insertion is stabilized with 3 knotless anchors and reinforced using medial row sutures from a concomitant supraspinatus repair. The proximal graft origin is fixed to the trapezius tendon using a Pulvertaft weave morphology to reconstruct the muscle-tendon unit. Results: Outcomes data from the literature demonstrate improvement in symptoms and patient satisfaction following the procedure. In a retrospective analysis of 41 patients, Elhassan et al demonstrated that 90% of patients experienced significant improvement in visual analog scale (VAS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score at mean follow-up time of 14 months. Discussion/Conclusion: In appropriately indicated patients, the lower trapezius tendon transfer offers restoration of external rotation strength and range of motion, pain relief, low risk of complications, and reduced risk of revision compared with alternative procedures. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Augmentation of a Transosseous-Equivalent Repair in Posterosuperior Nonacute Rotator Cuff Tears With a Bioinductive Collagen Implant Decreases the Retear Rate at 1 Year: A Randomized Controlled Trial

To determine whether the addition of a bioinductive collagen implant (BCI) over a transosseous equivalent (TOE) repair of medium-to-large posterosuperior rotator cuff tears improves the healing rate determined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 12-month follow-up. A Level I randomized controlled trial was performed in 124 subjects with isolated, symptomatic, reparable, full-thickness, medium-to-large posterosuperior nonacute rotator cuff tears, with fatty infiltration ≤2. These were randomized to 2 groups in which an arthroscopic posterosuperior rotator cuff tear TOE repair was performed alone (Control group) or with BCI applied over the TOE repair (BCI group). The primary outcome was the retear rate (defined as Sugaya 4-5) determined by MRI at 12 months of follow-up. Secondary outcomes were characteristics of the tendon (Sugaya grade and thickness of the healed tendon) and clinical outcomes (pain levels, EQ-5D-5L, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and Constant-Murley scores) at 12 months of follow-up. Of the 124 randomized patients, 122 (60 in the BCI group and 62 in the Control group) were available for MRI evaluation 12.2 ± 1.02 months after the intervention. There were no relevant differences in preoperative characteristics. Adding the BCI reduced the retear rate (8.3% [5/60] in the BCI group vs 25.8% [16/62] in the Control group, P= .010; relative risk of retear of 0.32 [95% confidence interval 0.13-0.83]). Sugaya grade was also better in the BCI group (P=.030). There were no differences between groups in the percentage of subjects who reached the MCID for CMS (76.7% vs 81.7%, P= .654) or American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (75% vs 80%, P= .829), in other clinical outcomes or in complication rates at 12.4 ± 0.73 (range 11.5-17) months of follow-up. Augmentation with a BCI of a TOE repair in a medium-to-large posterosuperior rotator cuff tear reduces the retear rate at 12-month follow-up by two-thirds, yielding similar improvements in clinical outcomes and without increased complication rates. Level I, randomized controlled trial.

Subacromial Balloon Spacer: When to Use This?

The subacromial balloon spacer is a novel treatment option for the management of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. This device is introduced into the glenohumeral joint and acts to alleviate the acromiohumeral impingement, caused by the massive irreparable rotator cuff tear. The device also redistributes the tension around the adjacent muscles in the joint, allowing them to compensate for the torn rotator cuff tendons. By doing so, the balloon can act as a "rehabilitation accelerator", ultimately resulting in improved shoulder pain and function. Adherence to balloon indications when selecting the appropriate patient is necessary, and these include an irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tear, with preserved subscapularis function, minimal to no osteoarthritis, and the ability to forward flex to 90 degrees. Clinical studies have demonstrated promising potential regarding the benefit of the balloon, with numerous studies demonstrating great outcomes after its implantation. Nevertheless, future research remains necessary to render the evidence behind its utility unequivocal.

Comparing clinical and radiological outcomes between anterior and posterosuperior rotator cuff tears: Is there a difference?

Comparing clinical and radiological outcomes between anterior and posterosuperior rotator cuff tears: Is there a difference?

Changes in in vivo three dimensional shoulder kinematics following latissimus dorsi tendon transfer for irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears: A systematic review with meta-analysis

BackgroundLatissimus dorsi transfer is a surgical procedure that can be used for treating posterosuperior rotator cuff tears. The procedure leads to improved shoulder function via alterations in the force vector couple around the shoulder. However, there is still no consensus on the biomechanical changes resulting from latissimus dorsi transfer. MethodsWe performed a systematic review of the literature on 3D motion analysis studies evaluating the effects of latissimus dorsi transfer on shoulder kinematics. The available data on segment and joint range of motion was extracted and subject to meta-analysis when consistent across the studies. FindingsOur meta-analysis of pre- and post-operative studies revealed a significant improvement in forward flexion and abduction following latissimus dorsi transfer. When comparing the latissimus transferred shoulder with an uninjured contralateral side the meta-analysis found no significant difference in flexion range of motion, while abduction and external rotation was significantly higher in the uninjured shoulders. The overall risk of bias was moderate to high. High heterogeneity was found in the reporting of data, which limited our ability to perform a meta-analysis across the studies for all interest outcomes. InterpretationsOur findings suggest that latissimus dorsi transfer for posterosuperior rotator cuff tears effectively improves shoulder flexion and abduction. External rotation is also expected to improve but at inferior levels as compared to the unaffected side. However, the heterogeneity of the reported data on 3D motion analysis studies highlights the need for better standardization in research and reporting as to conclude the impact of different joints.

Outcomes of arthroscopic single-row repair alone vs. repair with human dermal allograft patch augmentation in patients with large to massive, posterosuperior rotator cuff tears: a retrospective comparative study

Large to massive rotator cuff tears (RCTs) affect shoulder functions profoundly with unmanageable disability without intervention. The retear rates with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) in these patients are abysmal. Patch augmentation has been credited for preventing retears, improving functions by increasing the strength, and acting as a bioconductive scaffold. This study aimed to assess the retear rates and compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between the ARCR with and without acellular human dermal allograft (HDA) augmentation. This is a retrospective comparative study among patients diagnosed with large to massive, posterosuperior RCTs, operated between January 2020 and December 2021, including 36 patients (group I) with and 131 patients (group II) without HDA augmentation, with a mean follow-up of 20 (range, 12-35) months. The average age was 64 (range, 49-80) and 66 (range, 41-81) years in groups I and II, respectively. In group I, there were 16 male and 20 female patients, whereas in group II, there were 58 male and 73 female patients. The visual analog scale score improved to 1.1±1.7 in group I and 2.1±1.7 in group II (P=.005). There was a greater improvement in the University of California, Los Angeles shoulder score to 30.1±4.2 in group I compared with 23.2±3.9 in group II (P=.046). Forward flexion (degrees) improved from a mean of 103.2 ± 18.6 to 138.9 ± 23.5 in group I and from 106.4 ± 21.3 to 127.0 ± 19.5 in group II (P=.004). The acromiohumeral interval (mm) measured in anteroposterior radiographs increased to 8.4±1.8 in group I and 8.2±2.0 in group II (P=.006). The satisfaction after the procedure was 4.4±0.6 in group I and 3.1±1.1 in group II (P=.044). The retear rate in the HDA-augmented group was 5.6% as compared with 29.1% in the nonaugmented group, which was statistically significant (P=.007). There were no complications or adverse tissue reactions against HDA seen in any patients. In patients with large to massive, posterosuperior RCTs, patch augmentation with acellular HDA significantly averted the retears after ARCR without any graft-related complications. The augmentation also resulted in improved shoulder function and greater range of motion compared with the nonaugmented group.

Physiological Tensioning During Lower Trapezius Transfer for Irreparable Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears May Be Important for Improvement in Shoulder Kinematics

Background: Lower trapezius transfer (LTT) has been proposed for restoring the anteroposterior muscular force couple in the setting of an irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tear (PSRCT). Adequate graft tensioning during surgery may be a factor critical for sufficient restoration of shoulder kinematics and functional improvement. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to evaluate the effect of tensioning during LTT on glenohumeral kinematics using a dynamic shoulder model. It was hypothesized that LTT, while maintaining physiological tension on the lower trapezius muscle, would improve glenohumeral kinematics more effectively than undertensioned or overtensioned LTT. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 10 fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were tested using a validated shoulder simulator. Glenohumeral abduction angle, superior migration of the humeral head, and cumulative deltoid force were compared across 5 conditions: (1) native, (2) irreparable PSRCT, (3) LTT with a 12-N load (undertensioned), (4) LTT with a 24-N load (physiologically tensioned according to the cross-sectional area ratio of the lower trapezius muscle), and (5) LTT with a 36-N load (overtensioned). Glenohumeral abduction angle and superior migration of the humeral head were measured using 3-dimensional motion tracking. Cumulative deltoid force was recorded in real time throughout dynamic abduction motion by load cells connected to actuators. Results: Physiologically tensioned (Δ13.1°), undertensioned (Δ7.3°), and overtensioned (Δ9.9°) LTT each significantly increased the glenohumeral abduction angle compared with the irreparable PSRCT (P < .001 for all). Physiologically tensioned LTT achieved a significantly greater glenohumeral abduction angle than undertensioned LTT (Δ5.9°; P < .001) or overtensioned LTT (Δ3.2°; P = .038). Superior migration of the humeral head was significantly decreased with LTT compared with the PSRCT, regardless of tensioning. Physiologically tensioned LTT resulted in significantly less superior migration of the humeral head compared with undertensioned LTT (Δ5.3 mm; P = .004). A significant decrease in cumulative deltoid force was only observed with physiologically tensioned LTT compared with the PSRCT (Δ–19.2 N; P = .044). However, compared with the native state, LTT did not completely restore glenohumeral kinematics, regardless of tensioning. Conclusion: LTT was most effective in improving glenohumeral kinematics after an irreparable PSRCT when maintaining physiological tension on the lower trapezius muscle at time zero. However, LTT did not completely restore native glenohumeral kinematics, regardless of tensioning. Clinical Relevance: Tensioning during LTT for an irreparable PSRCT may be important to sufficiently improve glenohumeral kinematics and may be an intraoperatively modifiable key variable to ensure postoperative functional success.

The clinical impact of retears after repair of posterosuperior rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Structural integrity after rotator cuff repair is frequently not achieved, but the clinical consequences of a retear remain disputed. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to analyze the relationships between postoperative cuff integrity and shoulder pain and function. We searched the literature for studies of surgical repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears published after 1999 describing rates of retear and clinical outcomes and providing sufficient data to estimate effect sizes (standardized mean differences [SMDs]). Baseline and follow-up data of healed and failed repairs were extracted, including shoulder-specific scores, pain, muscle strength, and health-related quality of life. Pooled SMDs, mean differences, and overall change from baseline to follow-up according to structuralintegrity at follow-up were calculated. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess the influence of study quality on differences. This analysis included 43 study arms with 3350 participants. The average age of the participants was 62 years (range, 52-78 years). The median number of participants per study was 65 (interquartile range, 39-108). At a median of 18 months' follow-up (interquartile range, 12-36 months), 844 repairs (25%) were described as retorn on imaging. The pooled SMD between healed repairs and retears at follow-up was 0.49 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37 to 0.61) for the Constant-Murley score, 0.49 (95% CI, 0.22 to 0.75) for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, 0.55 (95% CI, 0.31 to 0.78) for other shoulder-specific outcomes combined, 0.27 (95% CI, 0.07 to 0.48) for pain, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.26 to 1.11) for muscle strength, and -0.001 (95% CI, -0.26 to 0.26) for health-related quality of life. The pooled mean differences were 6.12 (95% CI, 4.65 to 7.59) for the Constant-Murley score, 7.13 (95% CI, 3.57 to 10.70) for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and 0.49 (95% CI, 0.12 to 0.87) for pain, all below the commonly suggested minimal clinically important differences. The differences were not significantly affected by study quality and were generally modest compared with overall improvements from baseline to follow-up for both healed and failed repairs. The negative impact of retears on pain and function was statistically significant but judged to be of minor clinical importance. The results indicate that most patients may expect satisfactory outcomes despite retears.

Superior Capsular Reconstruction Using An Acellular Dermal Xeno- Or Allograft for the Treatment of Irreparable Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears: Clinical and Radiographic Outcome at Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up

Superior Capsular Reconstruction Using An Acellular Dermal Xeno- Or Allograft for the Treatment of Irreparable Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears: Clinical and Radiographic Outcome at Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up

Aetiopathogenesis of Rotator Cuff Tear in Patients Younger than 50 Years: Medical Conditions Play a Relevant Role.

Background and Objectives: Studies on rotator cuff tears (RCT) in patients younger than 50 years have focused on the post-operative outcomes. Little is known about cuff tear etiopathogenesis, although it is a common belief that most tears are due to trauma. We have retrospectively verified the prevalence of medical conditions, whose role in tendon degeneration development have been widely demonstrated, in a group of patients younger than 50 years with postero-superior RCT. Materials and Methods: 64 patients [44M-20F; mean age (SD): 46.90 (2.80)] were enrolled. Personal data, BMI, smoking habit, diseases (diabetes, arterial hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, thyroid diseases, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) were registered. The possible triggering cause and the affected side and tear dimensions were recorded, and statistical analysis was then performed. Results: 75% of patients had one or more diseases and/or a smoking habit for more than 10 years. In the remaining 25%, only four patients referred had had a traumatic event, while in the other eight patients, both medical condition and trauma were registered. The presence of two or more diseases did not affect RCT size. Conclusions: In our series, three quarters of patients with RCT had a smoking habit or medical conditions predisposing them to a tendon tear; therefore, the role of trauma in RCT onset in patients younger than 50 years is markedly resized. It is plausible that in the remaining 25%, RCT may be due to trauma or to genetic or acquired degeneration. Level of Evidence: IV.

Automated 3-dimensional MRI segmentation for the posterosuperior rotator cuff tear lesion using deep learning algorithm.

Rotator cuff tear (RCT) is a challenging and common musculoskeletal disease. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a commonly used diagnostic modality for RCT, but the interpretation of the results is tedious and has some reliability issues. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the accuracy and efficacy of the 3-dimensional (3D) MRI segmentation for RCT using a deep learning algorithm. A 3D U-Net convolutional neural network (CNN) was developed to detect, segment, and visualize RCT lesions in 3D, using MRI data from 303 patients with RCTs. The RCT lesions were labeled by two shoulder specialists in the entire MR image using in-house developed software. The MRI-based 3D U-Net CNN was trained after the augmentation of a training dataset and tested using randomly selected test data (training: validation: test data ratio was 6:2:2). The segmented RCT lesion was visualized in a three-dimensional reconstructed image, and the performance of the 3D U-Net CNN was evaluated using the Dice coefficient, sensitivity, specificity, precision, F1-score, and Youden index. A deep learning algorithm using a 3D U-Net CNN successfully detected, segmented, and visualized the area of RCT in 3D. The model's performance reached a 94.3% of Dice coefficient score, 97.1% of sensitivity, 95.0% of specificity, 84.9% of precision, 90.5% of F1-score, and Youden index of 91.8%. The proposed model for 3D segmentation of RCT lesions using MRI data showed overall high accuracy and successful 3D visualization. Further studies are necessary to determine the feasibility of its clinical application and whether its use could improve care and outcomes.

Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Criteria for the Preoperative Assessment of Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review

Background: Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is the most common modality for assessment of the rotator cuff before and after surgery. Several classifications have been described aiming to define main tear characteristics. However, there is still confusion when it comes to the reliability of those classifications. Purpose: (1) To identify all MR classifications available in the literature for preoperative assessment of rotator cuff tears, (2) to summarize available data on the reliability of identified classifications, and (3) to assess the methodological quality of reliability studies. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. All studies reporting MR assessment in patients with a superior or posterosuperior rotator cuff tear were included. After identification of the available MR criteria, reliability studies were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize findings. Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Appraisal of Reliability Studies checklist. Results: A total of 75 studies were included in this review. Eight categories of outcomes could be identified. Of the total, 62 studies reported interobserver reliability whereas 32 reported intraobserver reliability of some of the identified criteria. Each category reflected a variety of reliability, ranging from poor to excellent agreement. MR proved to be a reliable imaging modality to detect the structural integrity of the posterosuperior cuff, especially in cases of full-thickness tear; it was also reliable in terms of tear width and length and muscle atrophy based on a tangent sign or Thomazeau classification. All other classifications did not prove acceptable reliability. Methodological quality was high for 23 articles and moderate for 14. Conclusion: Preoperative MR is a reliable imaging modality to identify full-thickness tears, measure tear size and morphology, and identify muscle atrophy with tangent sign or Thomazeau classification. All other outcomes and classifications did not show acceptable reliability; therefore, caution is needed when using them for preoperative evaluation of a rotator cuff tear.

Superior Capsular Reconstruction Versus Latissimus Dorsi Tendon Transfer for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: Minimum 5-year Outcomes.

Arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) has been introduced as a successful alternative to latissimus dorsi tendon transfer (LDTT) for irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears. To compare minimum 5-year clinical outcomes of SCR and LDTT for the treatment of irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears in patients with minimal evidence of arthritis and intact or reparable subscapularis tears. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Patients who underwent SCR or LDTT and had undergone surgery ≥5 years earlier were included. The SCR technique used a dermal allograft customized to the defect. Surgical, demographic, and subjective data were collected prospectively and reviewed retrospectively. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores utilized were the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), the short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (QuickDASH), 12-Item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary (SF-12 PCS), and patient satisfaction. Further surgical procedures were documented, and treatment that progressed to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) or revision rotator cuff surgery was considered a failure. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed. Thirty patients (n = 20 men; n = 10 women) with a mean follow-up of 6.3 years (range, 5-10.5 years) were included. A total of 13 patients underwent SCR and 17 patients underwent LDTT. The mean age of the SCR group was 56 years (range, 41.2-63.9 years), and the mean age of the LDTT group was 49 years (range, 34.7-57 years) (P = .006). One patient in the SCR group and 2 patients in the LDTT group progressed to RTSA. Two additional (11.8%) patients in the LDTT group had further surgery-1 had arthroscopic cuff repair and 1 had hardware removal with biopsies. The SCR group demonstrated significantly better ASES (94.1 ± 6.3 vs 72.3 ± 16.4; P = .001), SANE (85.6 ± 8 vs 48.7 ± 19.4; P = .001), QuickDASH (8.8 ± 8.7 vs 24.3 ± 16.5; P = .012), and SF-12 PCS (56.1 ± 2.3 vs 46.5 ± 6; P = .001) PROs at the final follow-up. There was no significant difference between groups in median satisfaction (SCR, 9; LDTT, 8 [P = .379]). At 5 years, survivorship rates were 91.7% and 81.3% for the SCR and LDTT groups, respectively (P = .421). At the final follow-up, SCR yielded superior PROs compared with LDTT for the treatment of massive, irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears despite similar patient satisfaction and survivorship between procedures.