Posterior Wall Fragment Research Articles

Algorithms in acetabular fracture classifications.

Acetabular fractures are still challenging fractures. Fracture classification is the basis for understanding these injuries and to gain treatment and to choose a fracture type-based treatment concept. Using a systematic step-wise concept of fracture analysis, based on specific radiographic lines on standard X-rays allow even less experienced surgeons to get a correct classification of the elementary and associated fracture types of Letournel's classification. Algorithmic analysis of the iliopectineal line, (anterior column involvement), ilioischial line (posterior column involvement), presence of a posterior wall fragment, fracture lines involving the iliac wing and inferior ramus, and the spur sign (representing associated both column fractures) allow for approximately 80-90% correct classifications using standard X-rays when integrating these lines into an algorithm. Especially, T-shaped fractures, ABC and ACPHT fractures may be difficult to classify. Thus, advanced imaging, such as CT scans with multiplanar reconstruction and 3D reconstructions is additionally recommended.

Management of Intraoperative Acetabular Fractures in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Current Concept Review.

Intraoperative acetabular fractures (IAFs), a complication seldomly encountered in total hip arthroplasty, are typically a result of the impact of insertion of a cementless press-fit cup. Factors that contribute to the risk of these types of fractures include poor bone quality, highly sclerotic bone, and the use of a press-fit cup that is excessively large. The approach to management of these fractures is dependent on when they are identified. Immediate stabilization measures should be implemented for management of fractures detected during surgery. When fractures are detected postoperatively, the decision regarding conservative treatment is dependent on the stability of the implant and the specific fracture pattern. In the majority of cases, effective treatment of an acetabular fracture detected intraoperatively can be administered using a multi-hole revision cup along with anchoring screws in the various regions of the acetabulum. Selection of plate osteosynthesis of the posterior column is recommended when there is a large posterior wall fragment or pelvic discontinuity. In cases where anatomical dimensions allow, cup-cage reconstruction may offer a promising alternative to a combined hip procedure. The number of reports addressing the management of IAFs is limited. This review focuses on outlining the strategies that are currently available for management of this seldomly encountered complication.

Posterior Wall Fragments in Acetabular Both-Column Fractures: Morphology, Type, and the Significance of its Projection.

Most both-column acetabular fractures are combined with posterior wall fragments. However, the morphology of this posterior wall is varied, and how to fix this posterior wall remains a controversial topic. To investigate the morphological characteristics of posterior wall fragments of both-column acetabular fractures and select corresponding fixation methods. Data from 352 patients with acetabular fractures admitted to the level one trauma centre in our hospital between January 2006 and December 2022 were collected. The morphology of posterior wall fragments was observed and analyzed in 83 cases of both-column acetabular fractures and classified according to the consistency of posterior wall morphology. A fracture map of the posterior wall was created on a normal template according to the three morphological types of posterior wall fragments. Finally, the high-incidence area of the posterior wall fracture was projected onto the iliac fossa and the medial side of the posterior column to guide the fixation of the posterior wall fragment using the anterior intrapelvic approach. Fractures were divided into four types: I, large posterior wall fragment which was high in the ilium bone (34 cases, 41.0%); II, posterior wall fragment in the acetabular parietal region (18 cases, 21.7%); III, posterior wall marginal fracture (10 cases, 12.0%); and IV, non-combined posterior wall fracture (21 cases, 25.3%). The most common morphologies of the posterior wall fragments of the first two types were mapped and projected onto the anterior iliac inner plate and medial side of the posterior column, where the corresponding area could be used to guide the insertion of the internal fixation. Both-column acetabular fractures combined with posterior wall fractures can be divided into four types according to the morphology of the posterior wall fragment. Understanding the corresponding three-dimensional morphology and projection position of different types of these fragments can help surgeons determine the position and orientation of internal fixation of posterior wall fractures.

Intraoperative Acetabular Fracture.

Intraoperative acetabular fracture is a rare complication in total hip arthroplasty. It occurs mainly as a result of impaction of a cementless press-fit cup. Risk factors include decreased bone quality, highly sclerotic bone, and a press-fit that was relatively too large. The timing of the diagnosis determines the therapeutic approach. Fractures detected intraoperatively should be treated with appropriate stabilisation. Postoperatively, the stability of the implants as well as the fracture pattern determine whether a conservative treatment is initially feasible. Most acetabular fractures diagnosed intraoperatively are to be treated with a multi-hole cup, with additional screws anchoring in the different acetabular regions. In cases of large posterior wall fragments or pelvic discontinuity, plate osteosynthesis of the posterior column is indicated. Alternatively, cup-cage reconstruction can be utilised. Especially in elderly patients, the therapeutic goal must be rapid mobilisation through adequate primary stability, in order to minimise the risk of complications, revision, and mortality.

A retrospective study of hip posterior fracture-dislocation: closed reduction at the emergency department or in the operation theater?

BackgroundFor hip posterior fracture-dislocation, the current consensus is to perform joint reduction within 6 h to prevent sequelae. However, whether a closed reduction (CR) should be performed at the emergency department (ED) or in the operation theater (OT) remains debatable. We aimed to assess the incidence and factors predictive of CR failure at the ED in patients with hip posterior fracture-dislocation.MethodsPatients with hip posterior fracture-dislocation between 2009 and 2019 were included. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), injury severity score, new injury severity score, time from injury to first reduction attempt (TIR), presence of associated femoral head fracture, posterior wall marginal impaction, and posterior wall fragment size were compared between patients with CR success and patients with CR failure at the ED.ResultsFifty-five patients with hip posterior fracture-dislocation experienced CR attempts at the ED and were enrolled in the study. Thirty-eight (69.1%) hips were reduced successfully at the ED, and 17 (30.9%) experienced failure. No significant differences in age, sex, BMI, presence of femoral head fracture, marginal impaction, or size of the posterior wall fragment were found between the groups. TIR was significantly shorter in the successful CR group (2.24 vs. 4.11 h, p = 0.01). According to receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, 3.5 h was the cut-off time.ConclusionsFor patients with hip posterior fracture-dislocation, TIR was a critical factor for successful CR. If the time interval exceeds 3.5 h from injury, the success rate of bedside CR at the ER is likely to decrease, and the OT should be prepared in case of failed bedside CR.Level of Evidence III.

Morphological analysis of the posterior elements of associated both-column acetabular fractures.

It is still in dispute as to whether a posterior approach is applied to reduce the posterior fractures of associated both-column acetabular fractures (ABC-AFs). To analyze the morphological changes in the posterior elements including the posterior column (PC) and/or associated posterior wall (PW) fragments to provide a reference for surgical planning. The 3D computed tomography (CT) data of 100 cases of ABC-AFs were retrospectively analyzed using Mimics and 3-Matic software. The line distribution of the retroacetabular surface (RAS), the acetabular fossa, and the size of the PW fragments were analyzed. Fracture lines (n = 89) on RAS appeared in three patterns: transverse lines (n = 41) on the cephalic (65.8%) and caudal (29.3%) thirds; oblique lines (n = 34) on the mid-caudal thirds; and multifragmentary lines (n = 14). The lines of the displaced PW fragment (n = 61) were widely distributed in intra- and extra-articular regions. The mean radian of the PW fragments was >90° in 67.2% of cases and involved anteriorly to the vertex in 90.2% of cases. The average fracture span on the RAS was 0.60-1.00 in 63.9% of cases. The mean length of the spike of PW fragments was >20 mm in 80.3% of cases. For PC fractures, transverse lines on the cephalic third of RAS indicated a possibility of the anterior approach, while transverse lines on the distal third or oblique and multifragmentary lines suggest the posterior approach. A displaced PW fragment was involved more extensively both intra-and extra-articularly and may be optimally treated via a posterior approach.

Fracture Mapping of Both-Column Acetabular Fractures.

To characterize the location and frequency of the fracture lines and comminution zones of both-column fractures using fracture mapping. Both-column fractures were retrospectively reviewed in 4 Level 1 trauma centers. Mimics software was used to reconstruct the both-column fractures and simulate the fracture reduction. Then, the fracture lines and the intra-articular and extra-articular comminution zones were drawn on a 3-dimensional innominate bone template. The distribution of fracture lines and fracture fragments were also mapped on the two-dimensional template of the acetabulum. All the included patients were divided into low-variety group and high-variety group according to the anterior column fracture line above or below the anterior superior spine. The anatomical characteristics of the posterior wall fragment were also analyzed in these 2 groups. Seventy-eight patients with both-column fracture were included. The T type or inverted Y type main fracture lines divided the innominate bone into low-variety (n = 11) and high-variety (n = 67) both-column fractures. The extra-articular comminution zones are usually distributed between the posterior iliac fragment and anterior column fragment. High-variety type both-column fractures are usually combined with high and sharp posterior wall fragments, whereas low-variety type both-column fractures are usually accompanied by low and flat posterior wall fragments. The comminution zones in the acetabulum are mostly concentrated in the anterior and inferior parts of the acetabulum. The innominate bone is divided into 3 major parts in the both-column fracture, and the fracture center is located at the proximal of the acetabular dome. The both-column fractures are divided into low-variety and high-variety patterns. The location of the anterior column fracture determined the characteristics of the posterior wall fragment.

Is Plating Fixation Through the Kocher-Langenbeck Approach for Associated Posterior Wall Fragment Indispensable in Both-Column Acetabular Fractures?

ObjectiveThe treatment methods for posterior wall (PW) in both‐column acetabular fractures are controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare reduction quality, clinical outcomes, and complications of nonfixation for posterior wall fragment and plating via the Kocher–Langenbeck (KL) approach after anterior surgical procedures in both‐column acetabular fractures.MethodsForty‐nine patients with both‐column acetabular fractures associated with PW fixed via iliac fossa and Stoppa approaches from October 2012 to October 2017 were recruited into this study and were divided into two groups: Nonfix group (nonfixation for PW) and KL group (PW plating through the KL approach). Operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, reduction quality, fracture healing, and relevant complications of patients were reviewed. Merle d'Aubigné scores were used for assessing functional outcome.ResultsThe mean blood loss and operation durations were lower in Nonfix group than in KL group (both p < 0.05). The mean hospital stay durations were (18.54 ± 6.42) days and (21.17 ± 7.32) days in groups Nonfix and KL, respectively (p = 0.186). All fractures healed well with no significant difference in union time between the two groups (p = 0.210). The rates of satisfactory reduction were 84.62% (22/26) in Nonfix group and 86.96% (20/23) in KL group (p = 1.000). The mean Merle d'Aubigné scores were 15.62 ± 2.28 in Nonfix group and 16.17 ± 2.19 in KL group (p = 0.388). The complication rates were 7.69% (2/26) in Nonfix group and 34.78% (8/23) in KL group (p = 0.046).ConclusionsFor both‐column acetabular fractures associated with PW fragment, although fixation of PW was not performed after anterior surgical procedures, satisfactory outcomes could also be obtained. However, nonfixation was a less invasive choice with a lower complication rate.

Surgical Treatment of Marginal Impaction Injuries of The Acetabulum Associated with Posterior Wall Fractures

The procedure is performed with the patient under general anesthesia, placed under traction in either the prone or lateral position with use of a radiolucent flat-top fracture table and fluoroscopic guidance. The Kocher-Langenbeck approach is utilized. The big posterior wall fracture is identified and reflected in order to visualize the joint surface. Subsequently, traction is applied to facilitate visualization of the marginal impaction area(s). With use of an osteotome, the impacted fragments are disimpacted and elevated. The femoral head is utilized as a template for accurate reduction of the impacted fragments to the acetabular joint surface. The resultant subchondral void is assessed and may be grafted with use of a variety of bone graft materials. The 2-level reconstruction technique may also be considered when the surgeon desires to optimize stability of the impacted fragments and maintain anatomical reduction. The big posterior wall fragment is reduced and fixed with use of the standard posterior-wall reconstruction technique. Finally, irrigation and wound closure in layers is performed. Treatment alternatives include either delayed or acute primary total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients >70 years old. Preoperative identification of the marginal impaction is critical because articular incongruency leads to the development of early posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Achieving joint congruency is especially important in the young population in order to avoid an otherwise unnecessary early total hip arthroplasty. Expected radiographic outcomes are excellent or good in 82% of cases, as measured with use of the Matta radiographic score1-3. Expected function outcomes are good to excellent in 67.5% of patients, as measured with use of the Modified Merle d'Aubigné system1-3. Total hip arthroplasty has been reported as a secondary procedure within 2 years postoperatively in 7.6% of patients1-3. Joint irrigation is crucial in order to clarify the details of the fragmentation and facilitate removal of debris. Impacted articular cartilage fragments are often rotated and face away from the femoral head. Utilize osteotomes to elevate the impacted area, taking care to mobilize adequate subchondral bone and the accompanying cartilage in case the 2-level reconstruction technique is needed and can be successfully applied. Utilize the femoral head as a template after traction is released to facilitate anatomical reduction. A 1.6-mm Kirschner wire should be available in case it is needed to temporarily stabilize the impacted fragments. Avoid overstuffing the void with bone graft because this may subsequently hinder successful reduction of the posterior wall fragment. CT = computed tomographyAP = anteroposteriorK wire = Kirschner wirePDS = polydioxanone sutureAVN = avascular necrosis.

Fragment-specific fixation of posterior wall acetabular fractures.

Fractures of the posterior wall (PW) of the acetabulum have a wide variety of patterns; treating them as a single entity using the standard ilio-ischial plate would be inappropriate. We are presenting our experience with a fragment-specific fixation technique in which each PW fragment is reduced and fixed with separate buttress/anti-glide plate(s) in a tailored fashion, abandoning the use of the ilio-ischial plate. Fragment-specific fixation was applied to 46 patients with PW fractures (33 simple and 13 associated fracture types) with a mean follow-up of 34.9 ± 20.5months (range: 12-72). Kocher-Langenbeck approach was utilized for all patients with dissection limited to the fracture site (a limited form of the approach was used in three patients). Anatomical reduction of the fracture was achieved in 41 (89.1%) patients, imperfect reduction in four (8.7%), and poor reduction in one (2.2%) patient. Excellent to good radiological and functional results were achieved in 91.3% of cases. A single case had recurrent subluxation which was related to avascular necrosis of the highly comminuted wall fragments. Four patients developed post-traumatic arthritis and required total hip arthroplasty. None of our cases developed clinically significant heterotopic bone formation. With a versatile yet a strong-enough construct and limited soft tissue dissection, fragment-specific fixation yielded very good results with few complications.

Size and location of posterior wall fragment on CT can predict hip instability in a cadaveric model

Previous research has been unable to elucidate the exact factors that contribute to hip instability in the setting of posterior wall acetabular fractures. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of posterior wall fracture fragment size and fracture angle on the stability of the hip joint in a cadaveric model. Six fresh human cadavers (12 hips) were used. Specimens underwent pre-procedure CT evaluation and were then randomized to one of three groups: posterior wall fragment size (FS) of 15%, 20% and 25%. Osteotomies were performed starting at a fracture angle (FA) of 40°. The specimens underwent an exam under anesthesia (EUA). If the hip remained stable, the fracture angle was increased in 20° increments and re-tested until it became unstable. In the group with a FS of 15%, all hips were stable with a FA of 40°. Increasing the FA to 60° causedall hips to be unstable (subluxation or dislocation). In the group with a FS of 20% and 25%, all hips were unstable with a FA of 40°. In all specimens, aFS of 15% and FA of 40° were stable on EUA. Varying combinations of increasing FS size and increasing FA were all unstable. This study provides data for aCT-based measurement to predict hip instability in the setting of posterior wall acetabular fractures based on FS and FA. More research is required to validate this data in a clinical setting.

Les fractures de la paroi postérieure de l’acétabulum associées aux fractures des deux colonnes peuvent être habilement ignorées

IntroductionPosterior wall fractures may be associated with both-column acetabular fractures. Considering the differences in the pattern of these fractures in contrast to isolated posterior wall fractures, it is currently unclear whether they can be ignored or need to be addressed surgically. HypothesisStable posterior wall fractures can be skillfully ignored in patients with both-column acetabular fractures operated by an ilio-inguinal approach. Material and methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 49 consecutive patients who were treated for both-column acetabular fractures between the years 2009 and 2018. Considering the association of posterior wall fractures, we divided the cohort into two groups: group 1 (n=29) absence of posterior wall fractures; and group 2 (n=20) presence of posterior wall fractures, subsequently treated while skillfully ignoring stable posterior wall fracture according to our criteria. Intergroup comparison of radiologic and clinical outcomes and multiple linear regression for predictors of clinical outcomes were analyzed. ResultsNo significant intergroup difference in quality of reduction, post-traumatic osteoarthritis grade, or clinical outcome was noted. Poor post-traumatic osteoarthritis grade and poor quality of reduction of both acetabular columns were significant predictors of clinical outcomes in patients with both-column acetabular fractures. Whether posterior wall fracture was associated and skillfully ignored was unrelated to clinical outcomes. DiscussionPosterior wall fractures associated with both-column acetabular fractures can be successfully ignored if the posterior wall fragment is adequately attached to the acetabulum through the labrocapsular complex of the hip joint, and the hip-joint-congruency in the presence of<2-mm step-off and 3-mm gap. Level of proofIII, prognostic.

Isolated Buttress Plating of Posterior Wall Acetabular Fractures: Is it Sufficient?

Conventional fixation methods of posterior wall acetabular fractures feature the use of plating and lag screws. However, fixation of posterior wall fractures with buttress plating alone offers potential advantages by avoiding the hardware complications related to hardware placement through the wall fragment. The purpose of this study was to examine if buttress plating alone, without screw fixation through the wall would be a viable method of treating these fractures. Our hypothesis was that this technique would not result in loss of reduction. Consecutive series of patients with isolated posterior wall acetabular fractures treated by two independent surgeons at two Level I Trauma centers without screw fixation across the fracture (Boston Medical Center/Harborview Medical Center). All 72 fractures treated without a screw through the posterior wall fragment maintained reduction at an average of 1.6 years post-operatively. For fractures fixed with buttress plating alone, 92 % were reduced within 2 mm of being anatomic compared to 94 % of fractures that had screws cross the fracture. The described buttress plating technique without screw fixation in the wall is an acceptable form of fixation for posterior wall acetabular fractures without the theoretical risk of intra-wall screw fixation.

Posterior wall fractures associated with both-column acetabular fractures can be skilfully ignored

IntroductionPosterior wall fractures may be associated with both-column acetabular fractures. Considering the differences in the pattern of these fractures in contrast to isolated posterior wall fractures, it is currently unclear whether they can be ignored or need to be addressed surgically. HypothesisStable posterior wall fractures can be skilfully ignored in patients with both-column acetabular fractures operated by an ilioinguinal approach. Material and methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 49 consecutive patients who were treated for both-column acetabular fractures between the years 2009 and 2018. Considering the association of posterior wall fractures, we divided the cohort into two groups: Group 1 (n=29): absence of posterior wall fractures; and Group 2 (n=20): presence of posterior wall fractures, subsequently treated while skilfully ignoring stable posterior wall fracture according to our criteria. Intergroup comparison of radiologic and clinical outcomes and multiple linear regression for predictors of clinical outcomes were analysed. ResultsNo significant intergroup difference in quality of reduction, post-traumatic osteoarthritis grade, or clinical outcome was noted. Poor post-traumatic osteoarthritis grade and poor quality of reduction of both acetabular columns were significant predictors of clinical outcomes in patients with both-column acetabular fractures. Whether posterior wall fracture was associated and skilfully ignored was unrelated to clinical outcomes. DiscussionPosterior wall fractures associated with both-column acetabular fractures can be successfully ignored if the posterior wall fragment is adequately attached to the acetabulum through the labrocapsular complex of the hip joint, and the hip-joint-congruency in the presence of<2-mm step-off and 3-mm gap. Level of proofIII, prognostic.

Morphological Characteristics of Posterior Wall Fragments Associated with Acetabular Both-column Fracture

Treatment of both-column fractures with posterior wall involvement is still a controversial topic. This type of posterior wall fracture is different from isolated acetabular posterior wall fracture (AO/OTA62-A1). The aim of this study is to compare the morphology of the posterior wall fragments of these two fracture patterns using computed tomography (CT) scans. All measured data were compared, and the differences between the groups (acetabular both-column fractures with posterior wall involvement were included in group A, and acetabular isolated posterior wall fractures were included in group B) were significant (P ≤ 0.05), including the direction angle, displacement, articular surface-posterior cortex ratio and articular surface area of the fracture fragment. The intraclass correlation coefficient of the measurements included inter-observer (ICC = 0.860) and intra-observer (ICC = 0.853). The morphology of the posterior wall fragments associated with both-column fractures is significantly different from that in isolated acetabular posterior wall fractures, and the treatment of the posterior wall fragment involved in both-column fractures of the acetabulum should be different from that of isolated acetabular posterior wall fractures.

Outcome of the surgical management of single versus comminuted fractures of the posterior wall of the acetabulum

Introduction- Posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum account for 1/3rd of all acetabulum fractures. The comminuted fractures managed surgically have poor outcomes in 30% patients even after anatomical reduction and fixation. The choice of fixation, anatomical reduction and stable fixation are important for better outcomes. Materials And Methods- A total of 27 patients with a minimum age of 18 years were included in the study and managed surgically by fixation by buttress plates and screws in all patients by the Kocher Langenback approach. They were followed up for a minimum follow up of 1 year for their clinical and radiological outcomes. The outcome was assessed at the final follow up as per the Merle de’Aubigne score. Results- The post-operative reduction was anatomical in 18 patients, good in 7 and poor in 2. The clinical outcome as per the modified Merle de’Aubigne score at the final follow up was found to be excellent in 12 (44.4%), good in 8 (29.6%), fair in 3 (11.1%) and poor in 4 (14.8%). The radiological outcome was evaluated as per Matta’s criteria and was found to be excellent in 13 (48.1%), good in 5 (18.5%), fair in 4 (14.8%) and poor in 5 (18.5%). Conclusion- Supplementing the screw fixation of the posterior wall by plates allow for early mobilization of the patients leads to more favorable results in isolated single posterior wall fragment as compared to comminuted posterior wall fragment.

Surgical Hip Dislocation for Exposure of the Posterior Column.

Surgical hip dislocation is performed for safe and efficient management of acetabular fractures predominantly involving the posterior column. The dislocation of the femoral head allows for direct visualization of the hip joint during fracture treatment. The patient is placed in the lateral decubitus position with sterile preparation and draping of the ipsilateral leg to allow for dislocation. The skin incision is straight and centered over the greater trochanter. After the skin incision, the interval between the gluteus maximus and medius muscles is developed. The sciatic nerve is identified, and special attention to the course of the medial circumflex femoral artery is given during dissection of the piriformis and triceps coxae muscles (obturator internus and superior and inferior gemelli muscles). The latter are incised 2 cm posterior to their insertion on the posterior aspect of the greater trochanter. The vastus lateralis muscle belly is elevated from the lateral femoral shaft, and a trochanteric osteotomy is performed. The trochanteric medallion is rotated 90°, and the gluteus minimus muscle is released from the capsule. After complete exposure of the hip capsule, a z-shaped capsulotomy is performed whereby any injury to the posterior capsular attachments of a posterior wall fragment is avoided. The posterior column and the greater and lesser sciatic notches are exposed, with the sciatic nerve under protection. The femoral head is dislocated either anteriorly or posteriorly to obtain direct visualization of the hip. Reduction begins at the articular surface, in cases of marginal impaction, and proceeds to the posterior wall and/or posterior column and the anterior column, when involved. For fixation, 3.5-mm cortical screws acting as positioning or lag screws and reconstruction plates are used. The capsule is sutured, the trochanteric fragment is reduced anatomically and stabilized with two 3.5-mm cortical screws, the piriformis and triceps coxae muscles are sutured, and a layered closure is performed. The Kocher-Langenbeck approach might be used instead. Surgical hip dislocation facilitates assessment of cartilage damage at the acetabulum, marginal impaction, labral tears and femoral head lesions, removal or reinsertion of free intra-articular fracture fragments, direct visualization of the accuracy of reduction, and verification of extra-articular screw placement.

Post wall fixation by lag screw only in associated both column fractures with posterior wall involvement

PurposeTo evaluate the quality of reduction, clinical outcomes and complications of associated both column acetabular fractures with posterior wall involvement that are treated through single ilioinguinal approach and fixation of posterior wall by lag screws only. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review involving ninety-nine consecutive patients with associated both column fractures of acetabulum treated through single ilioinguinal approach. Patients were divided into two groups. The first group consisted of 35 patients presented with both column fractures with posterior wall involvement that fixation performed with lag screws. This group was compared to a second group of 64 patients with both column fractures without posterior wall involvement. The quality of reduction was assessed using criteria described by Matta. The size of posterior wall fragment was measured. Functional outcome was evaluated using Modified Postel Merle D’Aubigne score. Radiographs at the latest follow up were analyzed for arthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence classification), and femoral head avascular necrosis (Ficat/Arlet classification). ResultsThe study showed no significant differences in all preoperative variables (P>0.05). While intraoperative blood loss and operative time in group 1 were increased compared to group 2, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The height, relative depth and peripheral length of posterior wall respectively were 27.8±2.5mm (range: 24–35mm), 71.5±5.4% (range: 65–88%), 23.0±2.3mm (range: 17–28mm). The mean posterior wall fracture displacement is 5.0±3.2mm (range: 0–11mm). There was no difference regarding the quality of reduction between the two groups (P>0.05). The excellent to good clinical outcome was around 71.4% in the group 1 versus 73.4% in the group 2 at the final follow-up, this difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). There was no difference in rate of complications between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionsLag screws fixation of posterior wall through single ilioinguinal approach in associated both column fractures of acetabulum is a safe and effective method. Our results shown that the presence of posterior wall fracture in cases of associated both column fractures does not compromise the clinical outcomes.

Periprosthetic Fractures of the Acetabulum During Cup Insertion: Posterior Column Stability is Crucial

Periprosthetic hip fractures around acetabular components are rare with little information available to guide surgical management of these complex injuries. A retrospective review of intraoperative isolated acetabular periprosthetic fractures from three tertiary surgical units was done. A total of 32 patients were identified with 9 initially missed. Acetabular components were stable (type 1) in 11 patients with no failures; unstable (type 2) in 12 patients and treated with supplemental fixation. Non-union and displacement were correlated with absent posterior column plating. Missed fractures (type 3) had the highest reoperation rate. Anterior patterns all healed, whereas fractures with posterior column instability had a 67% failure rate. Periprosthetic acetabular fracture can heal successfully with posterior column stability. Plating is mandatory for large posterior wall fragments to achieve osteointegration.

Indirect reduction of posterior wall fragment using a suture anchor in acetabular posterior wall fracture with posterior labral root tear

Posterior wall fractures, which are the most common type of acetabulum fracture, are frequently accompanied with an avulsion tear of the posterior labral root as well as hip dislocation due to the injury mechanism. In the treatment of these fractures with an avulsed posterior labral root attached to posterior wall fragment, the use of a suture anchor can induce indirect reduction of a posterior wall fragment as well as direct repair of a labral root tear simultaneously. We describe the simple and efficient technique using a suture anchor in posterior wall acetabular fractures and surgical outcomes of two cases treated with this technique.