Posterior Subtenon Research Articles

Comparison of Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant and Posterior Subtenon Triamcinolone Injection in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema in Vitrectomized Eyes

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare posterior subtenon triamcinolone (PSTA) application and intravitreal dexamethasone phosphate (DEX) implant in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) in vitrectomized eyes. Methods: This retrospective study included 64 (48.12%) patients who received PSTA and 69 (51.88%) patients who received DEX implants in DME treatment after vitrectomy. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were analyzed before injection; at 1, 3, and 6 months after injection. The postinjection values were statistically compared with the preinjection value. Results: All postinjection CMT values in both groups were lower than the preinjection value (p < 0.05 for all). There were statistically significant increases in all postinjection BCVAs of the DEX group and postinjection 1-month BCVA of the PSTA group (p < 0.05 for all). However, there was no significant difference in BCVA values of the PSTA group at 3 and 6 months after injection (p > 0.05 for both). There was no statistically significant difference in all postinjection IOP values of the PSTA group (p > 0.05 for all). However, significant increases in IOP were observed in the DEX group at 1 and 3 months after injection (p < 0.05 and p = 0.02, respectively). The number of additional injections between the 3rd and 6th months after the initial injection was statistically higher in the PSTA group (p = 0.006). Conclusion: Both intravitreal DEX and PSTA administration are effective in the treatment of DME after vitrectomy. However, visual improvement persisted longer, and the need for additional injections was less in patients who received DEX.

Intravitrealversus Posterior Subtenon Triamcinolone Acetonide in Conjunction with Intravitreal Bevacizumab for Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema

Purpose &#x0D; Aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of combined simultaneous injection of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide and bevacizumab versus intravitreal bevacizumab and posterior subtenon triamcinolone acetonide in treatment of persistent refractory diabetic macular edema after intravitreal bevacizumab injection failure&#x0D; Methods&#x0D; 40 pseudophakic diabetic patients were enrolled in quasi experimental study conducted at ophthalmology department. All eyes were specifically diagnosed with persistent refractory diabetic macular edema with central retinal thickness of _____on OCT. Patients were divided into two groups. Group A was given simultaneous injection of intravitreal bevacizumab 1.25mg/0.05ml with posterior subtenon triamcinolone 40mg and group B was given intravitreal bevacizumab in conjunction with simultaneous intravitreal triamcinolone 2mg/0.05 ml.Patients were followed upmonthly till three months. Changes in the best corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure and central retinal thickness by optical coherence tomography were evaluated in both groups. Retreatment was given at 12 weeks interval whenever indicated by OCT.&#x0D; Results &#x0D; Group B showed a more significant decrease in the median CRT at 1month (p =0.0002)but after 3 months both groups showed a reduction in CRT which was not statistically significant between two groups _____. Both groups had significant improvement in BCVA compared to pre-injection baseline visual acuity.Between two groups BCVA changes were not statistically significant at 3 months _____.Five eyes in group B developed IOP beyond 22mmHg, which was treated with anti glaucoma medications within 2 weeks. No eye in group A developed IOP greater than 21mmHg. At 12 weeks, 7 of group A patients and 6 of group B patients developed recurrent macular edema and required repeated injections.&#x0D; Conclusion&#x0D; While treating persistent refractory diabetic macular edema, posterior subtenon triamcinolone is as effective as intravitreal triamcinolone in conjunction with intravitreal bevacizumab in reducing CRT and improving and stabilizing BCVA but in terms of IOP rise posterior subtenon injection is safer as compared to intravitreal injection. Both treatments are cost effective and combined simultaneous injections decrease the number of repeated injections.

Subtenon triamcinolone injection to treat serous choroidal detachment after glaucoma surgery: A case series.

To report the effect of subtenon triamcinolone acetonide (TA) injection in the treatment of serous choroidal detachment (SCD) after glaucoma surgery. In this prospective case series, patients with persistent, non-resolving, or progressive SCD after glaucoma surgery were enrolled. For those with non-resolving or progressive SCD despite of using systemic corticosteroids, topical atropine and topical steroids, one milliliter of TA (40mg/mL) was injected inferotemporally into the posterior subtenon space. Sixteen consecutive patients with a mean ± SD age of 70.12 ± 11.12 years were included in this study. After injection of subtenon TA, SCD was completely resolved after 1 to 4 weeks, with deepening of the anterior chamber in all cases. All cases were followed for at least 6 months after the injection with no signs of recurrence. Subtenon injection of TA is a safe and effective modality of treatment for resolving a persistent or progressive SCD after glaucoma surgeries.

Implant Insertion Procedure of the Port Delivery System With Ranibizumab: Overview and Clinical Pearls.

To describe the Port Delivery System with ranibizumab implant insertion procedure. A surgical procedure based on the clinical trial program in patients with retinal diseases. An infusion line is placed in the infero-temporal quadrant; a superotemporal quadrant corneal traction suture is recommended. The superotemporal quadrant peritomy of 6 × 6 mm is executed with gentle, purposeful tissue handling. Generous posterior and lateral sub-Tenon's capsule dissection creates laxity for the subsequent closure. Adequate scleral hemostasis is achieved with wet-field cautery to maintain a clean field. The implant is filled under magnification with a customized formulation of ranibizumab. A precise 3.5-mm-long scleral incision (4 mm posterior and parallel to the limbus) is created to ensure proper implant fit. The exposed pars plana undergoes laser ablation to reduce vitreous hemorrhage risk. A pars plana incision is made, and the implant is inserted perpendicular to the globe and seated flush against the sclera. Complete closure of both the conjunctiva and Tenon's capsule with scleral anchoring and mild tissue overhang at the anterior limbus is performed to reduce conjunctival erosion and retraction risks. The procedure is straightforward yet requires precise preoperative and intraoperative preparation and standardized surgical techniques. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2022;53:249-256.].

Choroidal Structural Changes of Posterior Subtenon Triamcinolone Acetonide Injection in Eyes with Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema.

Purpose To access the choroidal structural changes of posterior subtenon triamcinolone acetonide (PSTA) injection in eyes with refractory diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods Patients with refractory DME were enrolled and followed for 4 weeks after switching to PSTA injection. All patients underwent spectral-domain optical coherence tomography with enhanced depth imaging, and the choroidal images were binarized into the luminal area and total choroidal area. Subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) and choroidal vascularity index (CVI) were evaluated before and after switching treatments. Results After switching to PSTA treatment, the final best-corrected visual acuity and central subfield thickness in eyes with refractory DME were significantly improved compared to the baseline values (P=0.002 and P < 0.001, respectively). Both the SFCT and CVI decreased during the follow-up period, and significant decreases were observed at 4-week follow-up (P < 0.001 and P=0.012, respectively). The linear regression analysis showed a significant correlation between the baseline SFCT and the final visual outcomes (P=0.047). Conclusions The alterations of SFCT and CVI in this study suggest that the choroidal vasculature is involved in the pathogenesis of refractory DME and could be affected by PSTA treatment. SFCT rather than CVI may be a prognostic biomarker for eyes with refractory DME.

Practice patterns regarding regional corticosteroid treatment in noninfectious Uveitis: a survey study

BackgroundRegional corticosteroid therapy for noninfectious uveitis is well-established but usage patterns have not been studied extensively. This study aims to assess practice patterns of retina and uveitis specialists regarding their preferences on the use of local corticosteroid therapy.MethodsA 13-question survey was developed regarding the practice patterns of regional corticosteroid use in specific situations and populations. The survey was distributed to both the American Uveitis Society and Macula Society.ResultsResponses from 87 ophthalmologists were analyzed. The two most commonly used drugs were the dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®) and posterior sub-tenon’s triamcinolone (also known as posterior sub-Tenon’s Kenalog, or PSTK). Regional corticosteroids were used more frequently as first-line treatment in more than half of posterior uveitis cases when compared to anterior uveitis (39.1–46.0% vs 10.3%, respectively). Respondents were more willing to use regional corticosteroids in more than half of unilateral uveitis cases than in bilateral cases (54.7% vs 18.6%, respectively). A majority of respondents (67.1%) stated that they would avoid using regional corticosteroids in patients under 8 years old.ConclusionsOur results demonstrate more frequent regional corticosteroid use in posterior segment uveitis, unilateral cases, and avoidance in younger pediatric patients. Overall, the variability in these responses highlights the need for guidelines regarding regional corticosteroid use.

Intraocular Pressure Elevation After Posterior Subtenon Triamcinolone Acetonide Injection in Pediatric Non-Infectious Uveitis.

The objectives of the study were to evaluate non-infectious pediatric uveitis patients developing elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) and glaucoma following posterior subtenon triamcinolone acetonide (PSTA) injection. The data of 26 pediatric (<18 years) patients with active uveitis were retrospectively evaluated. Exclusion criteria were patients with a previous IOP >21 mmHg and previous subtenon or intraocular steroid injection. The IOP values of the patients before and after the PSTA injection and the treatments administered were recorded. PSTA injection was used in a total of 40 eyes. The mean IOP was 14.0±2.3 (12-19) mmHg before PSTA. The IOP was elevated (≥21 mmHg) in 19 eyes (48%) after PSTA with a mean IOP of 32.9±11.7 mmHg (22-55). The mean interval time to IOP elevation was 3.3±1.9 weeks (1-8). The IOP was controlled in 15 eyes (79%) with topical anti-glaucomatous and these patients were considered as having transient IOP elevation. Trabeculectomy with mitomycin C was required in 4 eyes (21%) in whom the IOP could not be controlled despite the use of maximum topical medication and oral acetazolamide at a mean duration of 9.7±3.6 months (4-19). Subtenon deposit excision was performed in 2 eyes (11%). The mean IOP at the last follow-up was 16.0±2.4 mmHg (12-20). In our study, an IOP elevation rate as high as 47% was found in pediatric non-infectious uveitis patients following only a single PSTA injection. Steroid-induced IOP elevation and resistant glaucoma can develop even after the first PSTA administration in pediatric uveitis. Filtration surgery and the excision of subtenon triamcinolone deposits, when present, are important in glaucoma management. The risk/benefit ratio must be carefully considered when administering steroid injections to children with uveitis.

Postoperative Acute Bilateral Irvine-Gass Syndrome following Uncomplicated Phacoemulsification Surgery with Trifocal IOL—Two Case Reports

The case studies are about atypical bilateral, postoperative Cystoid Macular Edema (CME) in two patients who underwent bilateral uncomplicated pha- coemulsification surgery with a trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL). In postoperative follow-up, both the cases presented with complaints of bilateral blurring of vision. Irvine-Gass syndrome has been diagnosed after evaluation of the retina by fundoscopy and OCT macula. Posterior subtenon steroid injection has been prescribed and given. Regular OCT examinations indicated substantial ede- ma improvement. Subsequent improvement in visual acuity was also noted in both cases. Cystoid macular edema can happen in any case irrespective of the quality of IOL. The visual outcome is satisfactorily responsive towards steroid medication.

Novel Postoperative Dropless Protocol for Micro-Incision Vitrectomy Surgery.

To evaluate the outcomes of a novel postoperative dropless protocol for 25-gauge and 27-gauge micro-incision vitrectomy surgery (MIVS). The institutional review board approved a single-center, retrospective study. A total of 493 surgeries were identified, and 451 cases from 369 patients met eligibility criteria. Instead of pre- or postoperative drops, patients were given a novel postoperative dropless protocol consisting of subconjunctival injections of a 1:1 cefazolin:dexamethasone mix at each sclerotomy and intravitreally, and injection of posterior sub-Tenon's Kenalog. Primary outcome measure was cases of postoperative endophthalmitis. There was one presumed case of endophthalmitis. Anterior chamber paracentesis sample was negative for culture and Gram stain. For all patients, mean logMAR best-corrected visual acuity improved from 0.65 (±0.69) to 0.57 (±0.61) postoperatively (P = 0.004). Mean intraocular pressure increased from 14.5 (±4.3) to 15.5 (±4.8) postoperatively (P < 0.001). Mean follow-up was 96 days. This novel postoperative dropless protocol could potentially be a convenient alternative to topical eye drops for patients undergoing MIVS, but further study is required to establish its safety. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2021;52:587-592.].

Macular dual retinitis with Herpes simplex and Cytomegalovirus following periocular corticosteroid in a patient of Pemphigus Vulgaris.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis may occur in non-HIV individuals following systemic immunosuppressive treatment or periocular corticosteroid administration. However, simultaneous multiple viral retinitis is rare in HIV-negative individuals. We report a case of dual viral retinitis in a non-HIV female on systemic immunosuppressive for pemphigus vulgaris who was administered a periocular corticosteroid injection. A 32-year-old female on double immunosuppressive therapy (prednisolone and cyclophosphamide) for pemphigus vulgaris, presented with gradual painless diminution of vision in the right eye for one month. She was initially diagnosed to have possible autoimmune neuroretinitis by the referring ophthalmologist and received a single injection of posterior subtenon triamcinolone acetonide for the same. Her vision however deteriorated further and she received an intravitreal ganciclovir injection with a revised diagnosis of CMV retinitis. Due to suboptimal response she was referred to us. Aqueous Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) revealed dual positivity for CMV and Herpes simplex virus. She was successfully managed with intravitreal ganciclovir injections, systemic acyclovir and tapering of systemic immunosuppressive drugs. The retinitis lesions resolved gradually leaving behind a pale optic disc and foveal atrophy at 12 weeks follow-up. Infective etiology must be ruled out in immunosuppressed patients before considering periocular corticosteroids. Dual viral involvement, although rare, may cause fulminant retinitis in predisposed individuals. High index of suspicion and PCR from ocular fluids should be performed at the earliest in patients with atypical or poorly responding retinitis lesions.

Efficacy of posterior sub-Tenon’s capsule injection compared to intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide for treatment of diabetic macular edema: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Diabetic macular edema (DME) is defined as a retinal thickening in one-disc diameter (DD) of the centre of the macula. It is a number of microvascular retinal changes that lead to blood–retinal barrier (BRB) disruption, causing leakage of fluid and plasma components into the inner and outer plexiform layers. Aim of the Work to conduct a systematic review and a meta-analysis estimating the efficacy and complications of posterior sub-Tenon’s capsule injection of triamcinolone acetonide (STTA) compared to intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) for management of DME. Materials and Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the databases Google scholar, PubMed, MEDS, web of science, EMBASE and Cochrane Library for published studies from 1 January 2000 to 1 September 2019.This meta-analysis included ten studies. They were randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs), and about 343 patients with DME (469 eyes) participated in these studies. Results : This study demonstrated a statistically significant change in the mean of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improvement and central macular thickness (CMT) reduction in both groups when comparing the baseline to one- and three-month follow-ups after the injection, though with no statistically significant difference in the IVTA compared to the STTA group. At a six-month follow-up, both groups showed no significant differences in the BCVA and CMT compared to the baseline. Both groups showed no statistical differences in the BCVA or CMT over the follow-up periods. Regarding intraocular pressure (IOP) changes, the present study showed that the mean IOP was elevated in both groups at one- and three-month follow-ups after the injection compared to their baseline. There was a statistically significant difference between both groups at one and three-months. The IOP was more elevated in the IVTA compared to the STTA group. At a six-month follow-up, both groups showed no significant difference in the IOP elevation compared to the baseline. IOP elevation was the most reported adverse effect in all included studies. Cataract formation is also reported in some studies, though no other complications, such as endophthalmitis, vitreous hemorrhage (VH), and/or retinal detachment (RD), are reported in any of the studies. Conclusion : STTA injection has a comparable effect to the IVTA injection and carries a lower risk of intraocular complications. It is considered an easy, safe, and valid alternative to the intravitreal injection for the treatment of DME.

Outcomes of XEN45 gel stent using posterior small incision sub-tenon ab interno insertion (Semi-open) technique.

To evaluate the 12-month outcomes of a novel posterior small incision sub-tenon ab interno technique of XEN stent insertion ('Semi-open'). Consecutive eyes underwent XEN stent insertion with theSemi-open technique by two surgeons between 1st July 2018 and 30th September 2019. All cases received subconjunctival injection of 0.1 mL of mitomycin C 0.2 mg/mL. Eyes with primary open angle glaucoma (OAG), secondary OAG or pseudophakic primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) were included. Exclusion criteria were phakicPACG, uveitic or neovascular glaucoma and postoperative follow-up <12 months. Primary outcomes were defined by World Glaucoma Association guidelines. Secondary outcomes included change in glaucoma medications, needling rates and complications. We included 37 consecutive eyes of 35 patients with primary OAG (n = 30), secondary OAG (n = 6) and pseudophakic PACG (n = 1). Thirty-one eyes (84%) received a standalone XEN implantation and 6 (16%) underwent XEN implantation combined with phacoemulsification. The IOP reduced from 19.6 ± 6.0 mmHg preoperativelyto 11.2 ± 2.6 mmHg at 12 months (P < 0.01). The number of glaucoma agents reduced from 3.49 ± 1.14 preoperatively to 1.57 ± 1.36 at 12 months. At 12 months, qualified success was 97.3% and complete success was 32%, with one case requiring trabeculectomy. Needling wasrequired in 19%of cases over the 12 month follow up. Complications included 19 cases of transient hypotony and 7 cases of transient choroidal effusion. There were no cases of exposure, bleb leakor bleb-related infection. Semi-open XEN technique achieves high surgical success rate in the medium-term with relatively low post-operative bleb needling rate.

Resolution of Pseudophakic Cystoid Macular Edema: 2 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide versus 40 mg Posterior Sub-Tenon Triamcinolone Acetonide

ABSTRACT Purpose To compare 2 mg intravitreal triamcinolone (IVT) versus 40 mg posterior sub-Tenon triamcinolone acetonide (STT) for the treatment of eyes with pseudophakic cystoid macular edema. Methods A retrospective, single-center review of eyes receiving 2 mg IVT between 3/1/2012-3/1/2017 and 40 mg STT between 1/1/2015-3/1/2017. Visual acuity (VA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were recorded at baseline, 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up visits. Results Forty-five eyes were included in the IVT group and 50 eyes in the STT group. Change in VA from baseline to 1, 3, and 6 months was not significantly different between IVT and STT (6 months: 2.3 lines vs. 2.4 lines, p = .10). The IVT group achieved significantly better CMT improvement from baseline compared to STT at 1 month (255 μm vs. 187 μm; p = .03), but this difference was not present at month 3 (214 μm vs. 212 μm; p = .79) or month 6 (176 μm vs. 207 μm; p = .29). During the 6-month follow-up period, approximately 7% of eyes in the IVT group and 12% of eyes in the STT group developed ocular hypertension (p = .43), and all cases were successfully managed with topical anti-ocular hypertensive therapy or observation. Conclusions 2 mg IVT and 40 mg STT both achieved significant improvement in vision and CMT with no significant difference between interventions at 3- and 6-month follow-up.

Combined intravitreal ranibizumab and posterior subtenon triamcinolone acetonide injections for patients with diabetic macular edema refractory to intravitreal ranibizumab monotherapy.

PURPOSE:The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) alone and concurrent IVR with posterior subtenon triamcinolone acetonide (PSTA) injection for patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) refractory to IVR monotherapy.MATERIALS AND METHODS:We enrolled 43 eyes of 43 patients with DME who received at least three times of IVR, which resulted in poor anatomical responses, with central foveal thickness (CFT) reduction <10% and postinjection CFT >300 μm. All the eyes received initial 3 monthly then pro re nata (PRN) IVR 0.5-mg injections. Twenty eyes continued PRN injections and 23 eyes received combined IVR 0.5 mg and PSTA 40 mg with at least 1-year follow-up. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and CFT were recorded from 1-month to 1-year follow-up.RESULTS:Following switch to combined therapy, the mean BCVA significantly improved from 0.61 ± 0.32 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) to 0.45±0.39 logMAR at 6 month (P = 0.003), 0.43±0.35 logMAR at 9 months (P < 0.001), and 0.48±0.45 logMAR at 1 year (P = 0.03). In eyes with IVR alone, no significant VA improvement was noted throughout the year. Significantly better BCVA was noted in the combined group at 6-month, 9-month, and 1-year follow-up compared to IVR-alone group. The timing of combined therapy showed a significant association with 1-year BCVA (t = 3.25, P = 0.018).CONCLUSION:Concurrent IVR and PSTA resulted in significantly better visual outcomes in 1-year follow-up for those refractory to preceding ranibizumab monotherapy for DME. Early addition of PSTA predicted a better visual outcome.

Intravitreal Ranibizumab versus Intravitreal Ranibizumab Combined with Posterior Subtenon Triamcinolone Acetonide in Diabetic Macular Edema

Objectives:This is a retrospective, comparative evaluation of the short-term efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) and IVR combined with posterior subtenon triamcinolone acetonide (STA) in the treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DME).Methods:A total of 79 pseudophakic eyes of 57 patients with DME who underwent IVR injection treatment were examined retrospectively. All of the patients were treatment-naive. In the study group (STA+IVR), consisting of 30 eyes of 39 patients, the STA and IVR were administered in the first treatment session simultaneously, followed by 2 consecutive monthly IVR injections. In the control group (IVR only) comprised 40 eyes of 27 patients, 3 consecutive monthly IVR injections were administered. Patients with serous retinal detachment (SRD) according to optical coherence tomography images were identified in both groups for subgroup analyses. The primary outcome measures were changes in central macular thickness (CMT), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and the intraocular pressure (IOP) at 1, 2, and 3 months post-injection.Results:There was no statistically significant difference between the demographic characteristics of the patients’ baseline BCVA and CMT measurements (p>0.05). For the IVR group, the mean pre-treatment CMT and BCVA was 421.20±89.10 μm and 0.42±0.24 logMAR, respectively. After the third injection, the mean was 308.12±59.07 μm and 0.20±0.12 logMAR, respectively. The combined treatment group baseline measurements were 454.50±122.52 μm and 0.54±0.29 logMAR, respectively. After the third injection, the mean was 294.22±50.33 μm and 0.27±0.21 logMAR, respectively. The decrease was statistically significant for both groups (p=0.001). Comparison of the CMT within groups revealed a statistically significant difference in favor of the combined group after the second injection (p=0.017). There was no statistically significant difference in the BCVA gains between groups (p>0.05). Patients with SRD were evaluated as a subgroup, and at the first month, the mean gain in CMT was -71.63±57.98 μm in the control group and -123.61±93.46 μm in the study group (p=0.048). The required anti-glaucomatous treatment was statistically significant in the combined group (p=0.008).Conclusion:Both treatments provided improvement in BCVA and CMT and can be considered functional and anatomically effective treatment options for DME.

Efficacy of Posterior Sub-Tenon's Capsule Injection Compared to Intravitreal Injection of Triamcinolone Acetonide for Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema

Background: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is defined as a retinal thickening in one-disc diameter of the center of the macula. It is a number of microvascular retinal changes that lead to blood-retinal barrier disruption, causing leakage of fluid and plasma components into the inner and outer plexiform layers. Aim of the Work: To conduct a systematic review and a meta-analysis estimating the efficacy and complications of posterior sub-Tenon's capsule injection of triamcinolone acetonide (STTA) compared to intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) for management of DME. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the databases Google Scholar, PubMed, MEDS, web of science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library for published studies from January 01, 2000 to September 01, 2019. This meta-analysis included ten studies. They were randomized controlled clinical trials, and about 343 patients with DME (469 eyes) participated in these studies. Results: This study demonstrated a statistically significant change in the mean of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improvement and central macular thickness (CMT) reduction in both groups when comparing the baseline to 1- and 3-month follow-ups after the injection, though with no statistically significant difference in the IVTA compared to the STTA group. At a 6-month follow-up, both groups showed no significant differences in the BCVA and CMT compared to the baseline. Both groups showed no statistical differences in the BCVA or CMT over the follow-up periods. Regarding intraocular pressure (IOP) changes, the present study showed that the mean IOP was elevated in both groups at 1- and 3-month follow-ups after the injection compared to their baseline. There was a statistically significant difference between both groups at 1 and 3-months. The IOP was more elevated in the IVTA compared to the STTA group. At a 6-month follow-up, both groups showed no significant difference in the IOP elevation compared to the baseline. IOP elevation was the most reported adverse effect in all included studies. Cataract formation is also reported in some studies, though no other complications, such as endophthalmitis, vitreous hemorrhage, and/or retinal detachment, are reported in any of the studies. Conclusion: STTA injection has a comparable effect to the IVTA injection and carries a lower risk of intraocular complications. It is considered an easy, safe, and valid alternative to intravitreal injection for the treatment of DME.

Comparison of intravitreal triamcinolone and posterior subtenon triamcinolone in diffuse diabetic macular edema

Aim: To assess the efficacy and complications of the intravitreal injection of Triamcinolone Acetonide (IVTA) as compared to posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone (PST) for the treatment of diabetic macular edema. Materials and Methods: Twenty four patients with type II diabetes, having diabetic retinopathy with macular edema were recruited. One eye of each patient was assigned to 4mg IVTA and the other eye was given 40 mg PST. Before and one, three and six months after treatment we measured visual acuity as well as thickness of the macula, with optical coherence tomography (OCT), and intraocular pressure (IOP). Results: In the IVTA group, a reduction in foveal thickness of 150µ was observed (p = 0.012) at 3 months compared to baseline. A reduction of around 70 microns was observed in the PST group which was not statistically significant (p = 0.290). In the IVTA group, the mean visual acuity increased from 1.048+/-0.512 at baseline to 0.707+/-0.552 at 6 months, which was statistically significant (p = 0.001). In the PST group, the mean visual acuity improved from 0.797 +/-0.425 at baseline to 0.727 +/-0.448 after 6 months with visual improvement maintained in 9 eyes (45%) throughout the study period. IOP rise in IVTA group was not statistically significant; whereas, in the PST group it became statistically significant. However, IOP rise lost its significance at 6 months (p = 0.09) owing to treatment with anti-glaucoma medications. Conclusion: Both IVTA and PST can be used as effective treatment options for diabetic macular edema. Keywords: Diabetic macular edema, Foveal thickness, Intravitreal injection, Posterior subtenon injection, Triamcinolone acetonide, Visual acuity.

Posterior Subtenon Injection of Triamcinolone (PSTT) for Macular Edema in Various Retinal Conditions

Posterior Subtenon Injection of Triamcinolone (PSTT) for Macular Edema in Various Retinal Conditions

Anterior Migration of Triamcinolone Acetonide after Posterior Subtenon Injection for Macular Edema Predisposes to Intraocular Pressure Elevation

ABSTRACT Purpose To evaluate the effect of anterior migration of triamcinolone acetonide on intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation after posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide (PSTA) for macular edema. Methods One hundred and ten eyes from 89 patients who received PSTA for macular edema were prospectively enrolled. The extent of anterior migration of triamcinolone acetonide was recorded immediately after the injection. If TA particles were visible in the subtenon space (or subconjunctival space), it was recorded as “anterior subtenon migration” (or “anterior subconjunctival migration”). The correlation between anterior migration of triamcinolone acetonide and severe IOP elevation, which was defined as an increase of 8 mm Hg or more in IOP, was evaluated. Results A total of 159 PSTAs were given to 110 eyes. After PSTA, anterior subtenon migration occurred in 70.4% and anterior subconjunctival migration occurred in 12.0% of injection. Severe IOP elevation occurred in 7.1% of those without anterior migration, in 25.9% of those with anterior subtenon migration, and in 31.6% of those with anterior subconjunctival migration after PSTA (P = .052). Compared to those without anterior migration of triamcinolone acetonide, the hazard ratio for severe IOP elevation was 3.307 in those with anterior subtenon migration (P = .12) and 5.289 in those with anterior subconjunctival migration (P = .042). Conclusions Anterior migration of triamcinolone acetonide after PSTA predisposes eyes to severe IOP elevation. Careful injection to restrict the triamcinolone particle within the subtenon space and behind the equator may lower the rate of IOP elevation after PSTA.

Orbital abscess caused by Exophiala dermatitidis following posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide: a case report and a review of literature related to Exophiala eye infections

BackgroundSubtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide (STTA) has been widely adopted in the clinical setting of ophthalmology and its infectious complications are rare. However, orbital abscess following STTA has been reported in seven cases. Furthermore, although eye infections due to Exophiala species are uncommon, there have been 19 cases to date. E. jeanselmei, E. phaeomuriformis, E. werneckii, and E. dermatitidis have been reported to cause human eye infections; however, to the best of our knowledge, orbital abscess caused by E. dermatitidis has not yet been reported. We describe the first documented case of fungal orbital abscess caused by E. dermatitidis following STTA. We also review the related literature of orbital abscess following STTA, as well as eye infections caused by the four Exophiala species.Case presentationThe patient was a 69-year-old Japanese woman with diabetic mellitus. She had a macular oedema in her right eye, which occurred secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion. An orbital abscess caused by E. dermatitidis occurred 4 months after the second STTA for the macular oedema, which was successfully treated by a surgical debridement and systemic administration of voriconazole.ConclusionsOur findings in the patient and from our literature survey caution ophthalmologists to the fact that STTA can cause fungal orbital infections, especially in diabetic patients. Furthermore, surgical treatment is one of the most important risk factors.