Posterior Spinal Surgery Research Articles

Proximal junctional kyphosis is a compensation for post-operative negative C2-FH in ASD patients: a cross-sectional study

BackgroundRecent studies have found that C2-FH is close to 0 cm in both standing and sitting position for asymptomatic adults. We hypothesize that the thoracic spine may compensate with PJK when the immediate post-operative C2-FH was not ideally restored in adult spinal deformity (ASD).MethodsThe inclusion criteria were as follows: ASD patients over 45 years old; Cobb angle > 30°; with posterior spinal correction surgery; at least 2 years follow-up. C2-FH was defined as the distance between the femoral heads to the C2 vertical line. All participants were divided into two groups according to the occurrence of PJK at the last follow-up: PJK group and non-PJK group.Results68 ASD patients, with a minimum follow-up of 2.5 years, were included. PJK was found in 24 patients (35.3%) while the rest 44 patients remained no sagittal malalignment. Immediately post-operative C2-FH showed significant difference between PJK group and non-PJK group (p = 0.015). However, at the last follow-up, C2-FH showed no significant difference between PJK and non-PJK group and the mean value of C2-FH in both groups was approximately − 1 cm, indicating that ASD patients could develop various compensatory mechanisms to maintain sagittal global balance. The AUC was 0.84 (95%CI 0.68–0.97), indicating the well effectiveness of ROC curve and cut-off value in predicting occurrence of PJK in ASD patients. Based on the ROC curve, the optimal cut-off value of C2-FH as indicators for occurrence of PJK was − 42.3 mm.ConclusionImmediate postoperative negative global malalignment (C2-FH < − 42.3 mm) may predict proximal junctional kyphosis in ASD patients. The normal value of C2-FH, − 1 cm, may be the target of global sagittal compensation, and PJK is a compensatory mechanism.Trial registration: 2021-LCYJ-DBZ-05, 2021.07, Retrospective study.

Thirty-day Unplanned Reoperations After Posterior Surgery for Thoracic Spinal Stenosis: A Single-center Study Based on 1948 Patients.

A retrospective study. The purpose of this study is to identify the incidences, causes, and risk factors of 30-day unplanned reoperation of posterior surgery for thoracic spinal stenosis (TSS) based on 1948 patients in a single center. Unplanned reoperation is suggested to be a useful quality indicator for spine surgery. However, the incidences, causes, and risk factors of 30-day unplanned reoperation in patients who underwent posterior spinal surgery for TSS have not been well-established. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients who underwent posterior spinal surgery for TSS from January 2011 to December 2021. Statistical methods including univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the incidences, causes, and risk factors. A total of 1948 patients who underwent posterior spinal surgery for TSS in our institution were reviewed, and 77 (3.95%) required unplanned reoperations within 30 days because of epidural hematoma (1.64%), wound-related complications (1.02%), inadequate decompression (0.41%), and implant malposition or failure (0.36%), neurological deficit (0.26%), and other causes (0.26%). After univariate analysis, seven clinical factors were associated with unplanned reoperation ( P <0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that upper thoracic spine surgery ( P =0.010), thoracic kyphosis ≥45° ( P =0.039), and intraoperative dural injury ( P =0.047) were independent risk factors for 30-day unplanned reoperation of posterior surgery for TSS. The incidence of 30-day unplanned reoperations after posterior surgical treatment for TSS was 3.95%. The most common causes were epidural hematoma, wound-related complications, inadequate decompression, and implant malposition or failure. Upper thoracic spine surgery, thoracic kyphosis ≥45°, and intraoperative dural injury led to an increased risk of unplanned reoperation within 30 days after posterior spinal surgery for TSS. 4.

Long-Term Outcomes after Selective Microendoscopic Laminotomy for Multilevel Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with and without Remaining Radiographic Stenosis: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study.

Long-term clinical outcomes of microendoscopic laminotomy (MEL) for patients with multilevel radiographic lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSS) have not been widely explored. The clinical significance and natural progression of additional untreated levels (e.g., remaining radiographic (RR)-LSS not addressed by selective MEL) remain unknown. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the long-term clinical outcomes of selective MEL in LSS patients and compare outcomes between patients with and without remaining RR-LSS to determine the efficacy of this procedure. Forty-nine patients at a single center underwent posterior spinal microendoscopic decompression surgery for neurogenic claudication or radicular leg pain in moderate-to-severe spinal stenosis. The patients were categorized into the RR-LSS-positive and RR-LSS-negative cohorts based on unaddressed levels of stenosis. Pre-operative and 10-year follow-up evaluations, including the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, visual analog scale (VAS) score for low back pain and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and satisfaction, were compared between the groups. Additionally, the need for reoperation was determined. MEL significantly improved JOA scores, lumbar VAS, and ODI over the 10-year postoperative period. Pre-operative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were not significantly different between the cohorts. Overall, 18.4% (9/49) of patients required reoperation during the follow-up period. The reoperation rate in the RR-LSS-positive (13.8%; 4/29) group was similar to that in the RR-LL-negative (15.0%; 3/20) group. MEL is effective for lumbar stenosis, with improved clinical outcomes up to 10 years following surgery. Selective MEL, addressing only symptomatic levels in multilevel stenosis, with residual remaining lumbar stenosis, is similarly effective without increased reoperation rates. Surgeons may consider more limited selective decompression in patients with multilevel stenosis, avoiding the risk and invasiveness of extensive procedures. Level III.

An evidence-based general anaesthesia and prone position nursing checklist: Development and testing.

Prone positioning during general anaesthesia is one of the most difficult practices for the perioperative nurse. Patients in this position are vulnerable to many preventable complications. However, no studies have developed an evidence-based tool to improve nursing practice during general anaesthesia and prone positioning. This study aimed to develop and test a general anaesthesia and prone position nursing checklist for use by the circulating nurse. A prospective pre-post study was performed between October 2020 and March 2021. The WHO checklist development model and evidence-based methods guided the checklist development process. We prospectively observed circulating nurses that attended to prone general anaesthesia during posterior lumbar spine surgery for 3 months before and after the introduction of the general anaesthesia and prone position nursing risk checklist. The main outcomes were successful delivery of essential prone positional nursing practices during each surgery and the nurse's opinion of the checklist's efficacy and utility. A general anaesthesia and prone position nursing checklist comprised of 4 pause points and 22 necessary nursing practices was developed. Seventy-two nurses participated in this study. Use of the checklist significantly increased the average performance of essential practices during each surgery from 72.72%-95.45%. Three measures had a compliance rate of 100%. The delivery rate of 14 measures was significantly improved, 91.7% of nurses considered the checklist easy to use, and 94.4% nurses would want the checklist to be used if they underwent a prone position and general anaesthesia operation.

Self-reported pain during the initial postoperative period following open lumbar spine fusion surgery does not correlate with the number of levels fused: A prospective trial of 40 patients.

Current spine postoperative pain control protocols consider the expected pain following spine fusion surgery to correlate with surgical extent, that is, the greater the number of operated vertebrae, the greater the postoperative pain. Due to this assumption, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols are principally applied to minimally invasive and percutaneous spine surgery and less to open extensive spine fusion operations. The aim of this study was to determine whether postoperative pain does in fact correlate with the surgical extent, potentially opening the door to non-narcotic postoperative pain protocols for this patient subset. Forty consecutive patients, undergoing open posterior spine surgery, were evaluated for postoperative pain during the first 72 after surgery. All patients were then divided into two groups according to the number of spine levels fused, and the correlation between the number of fusion levels and self-reported pain was analyzed statistically. Self-reported pain levels were not found to correlate with the extent of the spine operation. As "bigger operation" does not necessarily equate with "bigger pain," adequate postoperative pain control after extensive spine fusion surgery might be achieved without the routine use of narcotic medication, as practiced after minimally invasive and percutaneous surgery. Additional prospective randomized trials are needed to further substantiate this conclusion.

Utility of the Modified 5-Items Frailty Index to Predict Complications and Mortality After Elective Cervical, Thoracic and Lumbar Posterior Spine Fusion Surgery: Multicentric Analysis From ACS-NSQIP Database.

Retrospective review of multicentric data. The modified 5-item frailty index is a relatively new tool to assess the post-operative complication risks. It has been recently shown a good predictive value after posterior lumbar fusion. We aimed to compare the predictive value of the modified 5-item frailty index in cervical, thoracic and lumbar surgery. The American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Database 2015-2020 was used to identify patients who underwent elective posterior cervical, thoracic, or lumbar fusion surgeries for degenerative conditions. The mFI-5 score was calculated based on the presence of 5 co-morbidities: congestive heart failure within 30days prior to surgery, insulin-dependent or noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or pneumonia, partially dependent or totally dependent functional health status at time of surgery, and hypertension requiring medication. Multivariate analysis was used to assess the independent impact of increasing mFI-5 score on the postoperative morbidity while controlling for baseline clinical characteristics. 53252 patients were included with the mean age of 64.2 ± 7.2. 7946 suffered medical complications (14.9%), 1565 had surgical complications (2.9%), and 3385 were readmitted (6.3%), 363 died (.68%) within 30days postoperative (6.3%). The mFI-5 items score was significantly associated with higher rates of complications, readmission, and mortality in cervical, thoracic, and lumbar posterior fusion surgery. The modified 5-item frailty score is a reliable tool to predict complications, readmission, and mortality in patients planned for elective posterior spinal fusion surgery.

Association between Preoperative Urine Culture and Urinary Tract Infection after Spinal Surgery.

This is a retrospective study. This study assessed risk factors accounting for urinary tract infections (UTIs) to determine whether preoperative asymptomatic UTI (aUTI) could be used to predict UTIs in patients after spinal surgery. UTI is a spinal surgery complication that increases the incidence of surgical site infections. However, the risk factors for UTIs after spinal surgery remain unclear. This study included 509 (mean age, 54.5 years; 239 males and 270 females) patients who underwent posterior spine surgery at the department of the current study. First, clean catch urine was collected, after which a urine culture was performed for all patients before surgery. Preoperative detection of the aUTI (>105 colony-forming units/mL) rate was then determined. Subsequently, risk factors for postoperative UTI were evaluated using logistic regression analysis with the following as independent variables: age, sex, obesity, diabetes, spinal cord tumor, the preoperative Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, JOA-bladder function, preoperative urine culture positivity, aUTI, preoperative Escherichia coli detection, the postoperative catheter placement period, instrumentation, number of surgical levels, surgery duration, and blood loss. The preoperative aUTI and postoperative UTI incidences were 8.1% and 4.1%, respectively. Furthermore, multivariate logistic analysis showed that the risk factor for postoperative UTI was preoperative aUTI (odds ratio, 4.234; 95% confidence interval, 1.532-11.702; p=0.005). Preoperative aUTI is a risk factor for UTI in patients after spinal surgery.

P31. How positive cultures affected clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary lumbar fusion

<h3>BACKGROUND CONTEXT</h3> Occult bacteria have been linked to deep and chronic infections in spine surgery. These organisms are commensal to dermal and deeper tissue layers, including the intervertebral disc and bone. We hypothesize that standard surgical skin preparation nor preoperative antibiotics properly access and eradicate these organisms prior to primary spine surgery. These organisms can potentially adhere to the biofilm surrounding the hardware and limit bone formation. <h3>PURPOSE</h3> To determine the colonization rate of occult bacteria in the superficial and deep tissue layers of healthy patients undergoing primary instrumented lumbar spine surgery. <h3>STUDY DESIGN/SETTING</h3> This prospective, consecutive cohort of patients undergoing primary lumbar spine surgery at a single tertiary center. All patients met the inclusion/exclusion criteria which included between the ages of 18 and 80, undergoing a posterior approach with pedicle screw instrumentation with no evidence of a prior or current fracture, trauma, tumor, or an active systemic or local infection. Patients were also excluded if they were immunosuppressed or had received prior surgery at any lumbar level with hardware. This study was approved by our institutional review board and ethics review panel. <h3>PATIENT SAMPLE</h3> Fifty-four patients. <h3>OUTCOME MEASURES</h3> Culture swabs, fusion rates, revision rates. <h3>METHODS</h3> All patients received preoperative antibiotics and skin preparation. Culture samples were subsequently obtained from the superficial skin, dermal wound-edge following incision, hypodermis and the vertebral pedicle prior to instrumentation implantation. Control culture samples were taken from scalpel, tap and suction prior to incision. The primary outcome was the rate of positive culture samples from the various layers traversed during standard surgical spine exposure. Clinical outcomes of fusion status and revision rate were collected. <h3>RESULTS</h3> A total of 525 culture samples were obtained, and samples were positive in 33.3% of patients (18/54). Culture-positive patients had on average 3.1 positive samples per case. Superficial skin samples were positive in 13.0% (n=7), dermal layer samples in 16.7% (n=9), hypodermis samples in 13.0% (n=7), and vertebral samples in 20.4% (n=11) of cases. All control samples taken were culture-negative. C. acnes was the most common organism isolated, in 83.3% of culture-positive cases. Significantly more males were culture-positive than females. Patients with positive cultures were treated with antibiotics. At one-year postoperative, patients in culture-positive group had similar fusion rates to culture-negative groups. However, delayed fusion was observed at a higher rate in the culture-positive group. <h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3> Occult bacteria was detected in one-third of patients undergoing primary instrumented posterior spine surgery. Deep culture samples of the vertebral pedicle were more often positive than dermal layer samples. The data collected supports our hypothesis that occult bacteria persist in the skin and deeper tissue layers regardless of the efforts made by preoperative skin preparation and prophylactic antibiotics. The clinical sequela for culture-positive patients, although addressed perioperatively, was a higher incidence of delayed fusion. <h3>FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS</h3> This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

Posterior Instrumented Spinal Surgery Outcomes in the Elderly: A Comparison of the 5-Item and 11-Item Modified Frailty Indices.

Retrospective Cohort. To validate the most concise risk stratification system to date, the 5-item modified frailty index (mFI-5), and compare its effectiveness with the established 11-item modified frailty index (mFI-11) in the elderly population undergoing posterior instrumented spine surgery. A single centre retrospective review of posterior instrumented spine surgeries in patients aged 65years and older was conducted. The primary outcome was rate of post-operative major complications (Clavien-Dindo Classification ≥ 4). Secondary outcome measures included rate of all complications, 6-month mortality and surgical site infection. Multi-variate analysis was performed and adjusted receiver operating characteristic curves were generated and compared by DeLong's test. The indices were correlated with Spearman's rho. 272 cases were identified. The risk of major complications was independently associated with both the mFI-5 (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.01-3.55, P = .047) and mFI-11 (OR 3.73, 95% CI 1.90-7.30, P = .000). Both the mFI-5 and mFI-11 were statistically significant predictors of risk of all complications (P = .007 and P = .003), surgical site infection (P = .011 and P = .003) and 6-month mortality (P = .031 and P = .000). Adjusted ROC curves determined statistically similar c-statistics for major complications (.68 vs .68, P = .64), all complications (.66 vs .64, P = .10), surgical site infection (.75 vs .75, P = .76) and 6-month mortality (.83 vs .81, P = .21). The 2 indices correlated very well with a Spearman's rho of .944. The mFI-5 and mFI-11 are equally effective predictors of postoperative morbidity and mortality in this population. The brevity of the mFI-5 is advantageous in facilitating its daily clinical use.

The impact of stratified hypoalbuminemia and dialysis on morbidity/mortality after posterior spinal fusion surgery: An ACS-NSQIP study.

Background: Preoperative optimization in patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion is essential to limit the number and severity of postoperative complications. Here, we, additionally, evaluated the impact of hypoalbuminemia on morbidity and mortality after posterior spinal fusion surgery.Methods: This retrospective analysis was performed using data from a prospective multicentric database (ACSNSQIP:2015–2020) regarding patients undergoing posterior spinal fusions. Factors studied included; baseline demographics and 30-day postoperative complications (i.e., reoperations, readmissions, and mortality rates).Results: There were 6805 patients who met the inclusion criteria. They averaged 62 years of age and had an average BMI of 30.2. Within the 30-day postoperative period, 634 (9.3%) sustained complications; 467 (6.9%) were readmitted, 263 (3.9%) required reoperations, and 37 (0.5%) expired. Although multiple preoperative risk factors were analyzed, hypoalbuminemia, severe hypoalbuminemia, and dialysis were the strongest independent risk factors associated with complications (i.e., reoperations, readmissions, and mortality).Conclusion: Hypoalbuminemia, severe hypoalbuminemia, and dialysis were significant predictors for morbidity and mortality after posterior spinal fusion surgery.

Safety and efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy in treating deep surgical site infection after lumbar surgery.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for post-operative deep surgical site infection (SSI) after posterior instrumented spinal surgery. We retrospectively compared the clinical outcomes of NPWT with standard debridement for deep SSI after posterior instrumented spinal surgery from 2012 to 2020 in our department. The primary outcomes were peri-operative characteristics including positive organism results, duration of fever, and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores threedays after re-operation. The secondary outcomes were post-operative characteristics including implant infection recurrence, implant retention rate, duration of hospitalization, and VAS at discharge. Pearson's chi-squared analysis (categorical) and Student's t test (continuous) were used to determine the differences. Thirty-four patients were included, of which 19 underwent NPWT, and 15 underwent standard debridement. Patients in the NPWT group all significantly improved primary outcomes including duration of fever after re-operation (0.95 ± 1.13 vs 4.07 ± 5.35, P = 0.001), positive organism results (14 of 19 vs 2 of 15, P < 0.01), and VAS at 3days after re-operation (2.58 ± 0.69 vs 3.40 ± 1.06, P < 0.05). Patients in NPWT group exhibited significant decrease in implant infection recurrence (0 of 19 vs 5 of 15, P < 0.01), implant retention rate (19 of 19 vs 10 of 15, P < 0.01), duration of hospitalization (27.74 ± 10.95 vs 37.67 ± 13.67, P < 0.01). NPWT is a feasible and safe treatment option for deep SSI after posterior instrumented spinal surgery.

The Influence of High Blood Pressure on Developing Symptomatic Lumbar Epidural Hematoma after Posterior Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery: Clinical Data Warehouse Analysis.

Background: Determining the risk factors for symptomatic lumbar epidural hematoma (SLEH) is important for preventing postoperative SLEH. However, the relationship between blood pressure and SLEH is still debatable. The purpose of our study was to determine the risk factors for postoperative SLEH, to assess the influence of high blood pressure on developing SLEH after posterior lumbar spinal fusion surgery, and to evaluate the usefulness of big data analysis utilizing a clinical data warehouse (CDW). Methods: The clinical data of patients who had undergone posterior lumbar spinal fusion surgery were acquired from the CDW of Hallym University Medical Center. The acquired clinical data were compared between patients without postoperative SLEH and with postoperative SLEH. Results: Postoperative SLEH that required hematoma evacuation surgery within 72 h after posterior lumbar spinal fusion surgery occurred in 17 (1.3%) of 1313 patients. According to the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the risk factors for postoperative SLEH are platelet count difference (OR 1.28, p = 0.03), postoperative international normalized ratio (INR) difference (OR 31.4, p = 0.028), and postoperative systolic blood pressure (SBP) difference (≥10 mmHg) (OR 1.68, p = 0.048). An increase in postoperative SBP (OR 1.68, p = 0.048) had a statistically significant influence on the occurrence of postoperative SLEH. Conclusions: Big data analysis utilizing a CDW could be useful for extending our knowledge of the risk factors for postoperative SLEH and preventing postoperative SLEH after posterior lumbar spinal fusion surgery.

Effect of Prone Position on Respiratory Dynamics During Posterior Spine Surgery

Effect of Prone Position on Respiratory Dynamics During Posterior Spine Surgery

Liposomal bupivacaine in posterior spine surgery: A piece of the puzzle for postoperative pain

BackgroundLiposomal bupivacaine (LB) is a local analgesic that may be used at the time of surgery to limit postoperative pain around the surgical site. Its efficacy in decreasing pain, decreasing narcotic consumption, decreasing length of stay, and improving mobility is an area of intense research. The purpose of this study was to determine whether LB use was associated with improved patient-reported pain scores in the first 72 h following posterior spinal surgery, decreased postoperative narcotic need, and decreased length of stay. MethodsOne hundred and five patients undergoing elective posterior cervical or lumbar surgery were included in retrospective analysis. Forty-eight patients who received LB intraoperatively were compared with a historical cohort of 56 patients who underwent similar procedures and did not receive postsurgical infiltration with local analgesia. The same pain medication protocol was utilized postoperatively. ResultsDemographics, clinical characteristics, and total morphine milligram equivalents did not differ significantly between the groups. The treatment group averaged a decreased length of stay (1.85 days treatment, 2.68 days control, p = 0.057). Treatment with LB was associated with lower pain levels at 24 h (5.2 treatment, 6.4 control, p = 0.04) and 48–72 h (4.9 treatment, 6.6 control, p = 0.007) after surgery. ConclusionsLB improved patient perception of pain in the acute postoperative time period.Intraoperative LB injection, coupled with focused early mobilization efforts and multimodal pain control, may lead to improved patient-reported outcomes, shorter length of stay, and decreased risk of perioperative complications.

Pneumothorax in the Setting of Spinal Surgery: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

The purpose of this paper is to review the occurrence and management of a tension pneumothorax, which was exacerbated status post posterior spinal surgery. A retrospective review of intraoperative reports, imaging, and pertinent medical records was conducted for a patient who underwent posterior spinal surgery with a tiny apical pneumothorax, which subsequently developed into a major pneumothorax. The clinical signs imperative to recognition and prompt treatment are discussed. Our case report demonstrates that the unrecognized disruption of the pleural cavity during posterior spinal surgery caused the exacerbation of the patient's bilateral pneumothoraces. The patient was successfully treated with finger thoracostomy and chest tube insertion. In conclusion, posterior spinal surgery is an invasive procedure with the potential for serious complications such as the exacerbation of a previous non-surgical pneumothorax. A low index of suspicion is imperative due to the potentially lethal nature of pneumothoraces. Vital signs, pulmonary exam findings, portable radiography, and sonography equipment are all invaluable to the accurate diagnosis and early intervention of patients with pneumothoraces.

Serum Procalcitonin Levels in Postoperative Monitoring of Diabetic Patients with Posterior Lumber Vertebral Stabilization Surgery: A Prospective Comparative Study

Objective:To compare the serum procalcitonin levels and other infection markers released in response to the inflammatory response that develops secondary to the operation in patients with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus who underwent spinal instrumentation.Methods:Fifty patients, who belonged to the American Society of Anesthesiologist I-II, were between 18 and 65 years of age, and who had planned for posterior spinal instrumentation surgery were grouped into 2 as group I (n = 25) type 2 diabetic patients (group DM) and group II (n = 25) non-diabetic patients (group non-DM). On the operation day, preoperatively (T0), 5 minutes after intraoperative instrument placement (T1), on postoperative 24th hour (T2), 48th hour (T3), 3rd day (T4), 5th day (T5), 7th day (T6), 10th day (T7), and 15th day (T8), serum samples were obtained from the patients for the evaluation of procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and neutrophil values.Results:Procalcitonin levels were higher in the diabetic patient group at all time points (P < .01); C-reactive protein levels were higher in T1, T2, and T5 in the diabetic patient group (P < .05). There was no difference in erythrocyte sedimentation rate or neutrophil counts between the groups (P > .05). When the alterations in procalcitonin levels were compared between diabetic and non-diabetic groups, in diabetic patients, there were significantly higher increases in the first 6 timelines (P < .05).Conclusion:In diabetic patients, the procalcitonin levels were significantly higher at all time points, predicting an augmented bacterial infection in those patients compared with the non-diabetic patients.

Efficacy of Halo-Gravity Traction in the Perioperative Treatment of Severe Scoliosis and Kyphosis: A Comparison of Adolescent and Adult Patients

The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of halo-gravity traction (HGT) with subsequent surgical treatment in adolescent and adult patients with severe scoliosis by evaluating the radiographic outcomes and clinical complications. We performed a retrospective analysis of 51 patients with severe scoliosis who underwent a posterior spinal instrumented fusion with HGT during the perioperative period between March 2010 and June 2017. The patients were divided into 2 groups: adults (age >18years) and adolescents (age 10-18years). All patients were followed with full posteroanterior and lateral spine radiographs, bending films, neurological complications, and lung function tests for a minimum of 2years. Deformity correction, pulmonary function testing, and clinical complications were compared between the 2 groups. We identified 29 adults (8 males and 21 females, mean age= 23.7±8.7years) and 22 adolescents (10 males and 12 females, mean age= 13.0±4.5years). In the adult group, the mean Cobb angle of the main curve before HGT was 141.7±18.2°, which improved to 126.4±8.6° and 67.5±10.2° after traction and operation, respectively. The kyphotic angle was corrected from 137.1±15.6° before traction to 122.5±11.3° after traction to 67.6±13.8° after operation. The mean functional vital capacity% and forced expiratory volume in one second% were 43.1% and 37.5%, which improved to 46.7% and 41.7% after traction, respectively. In the adolescent group, the mean correction of the main curve improved from 139.3±12.6° before traction to 112.1±8.3° after traction to 59±13.1° after surgical intervention. The kyphotic angle was corrected from 130.7±9.4° before traction to 101.5±12.2° after traction and then to 48.2±10.1° after surgical intervention. Overall, patients in both groups showed significant improvement in their main scoliosis and kyphosis (P < 0.05), while the correction rate of the main curve and kyphosis was significantly higher in the adolescent group than that in the adult group (P < 0.05). The functional vital capacity% increased from 44.8% to 55.0% and the forced expiratory volume in one second% increased from 44.0% to 51.0% after using HGT. In terms of surgical outcomes, the incidence of postoperative neurological complications was 27.6% and 18.2% in the 2 groups, respectively. HGT is an effective and safe method to correct spinal deformities and improve lung function, especially in adolescent patients with severe scoliosis. In addition, it can potentially reduce the risk of neurological complications and the level of osteotomy in posterior spinal instrumented fusion surgery.

Efficacy and Safety of Subfascial Epidural Drainage Protocol After Intraoperative Durotomy in Posterior Thoracic and Lumbar Spine Surgery: Reoperation Prevention and Outcomes Among Drained and Undrained Cohorts.

Persistent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) egress after durotomy in posterior thoracic or lumbar spine surgery may cause devastating complications. Persistent CSF leaks may require reoperation, which confers additional cost and morbidity. To evaluate the efficacy of our subfascial epidural drainage protocol in the setting of durotomy to prevent reoperation. A retrospective cohort study of drained and undrained cohorts was completed to identify factors associated with reoperation for persistent CSF leak-related symptoms. The efficacy and safety of this 7-day subfascial epidural drainage protocol was assessed by comparing reoperation incidence, perioperative complications, rehabilitation necessity, and readmissions. In total, 156 patients underwent subfascial epidural drainage, and 14 were not drained. Subfascial drainage for up to 7 days was associated with a significantly lower incidence of reoperation than no drainage (3.3% vs 14%, respectively; P = .03). Perioperative complication incidence was similar between cohorts (12.8% vs 21.4%, respectively; P = .37), and length of stay was unchanged regardless of drainage (median 7 days). Subfascial drainage conferred a nearly 2-fold relative risk reduction in inpatient rehabilitation requirement (RR 0.55) and 3-fold relative risk reduction in 30-day (RR 0.31) and 90-day readmission (RR 0.36). Factors associated with reoperation among drained patients included drainage longer than 7 days, tobacco use, age younger than 50 years, and longer segment operations. Revision spine surgery was associated with reoperation among undrained patients. When followed after durotomy, our subfascial epidural drainage protocol results in fewer reoperations than in an undrained cohort without prohibitive cost and no added morbidity.

Comparison of Relative Value Units and 30-Day Outcomes Between Primary and Revision Pediatric Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Retrospective cohort study. The aim of this study was to compare the relative value units (RVUs) and 30-day outcomes between primary and revision pediatric spinal deformity (PSD) surgery. PSD surgery is frequently complicated by the need for reoperation. However, there is limited literature on physician reimbursement rates and short-term outcomes following primary versus revision spinal deformity surgery in the pediatric population. This study utilizes data obtained from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Pediatric database. Patients between 10 and 18 years of age who underwent posterior spinal deformity surgery between 2012 and 2018 were included. Univariate and multivariate regression were used to assess the independent impact of revision surgery on RVUs and postoperative outcomes, including 30-day readmission, reoperation, morbidity, and complications. The study cohort included a total of 15,055 patients, with 358 patients who underwent revision surgery. Patients in the revision group were more likely to be younger and male sex. Revision surgery more commonly required osteotomy (13.7% vs. 8.3%, P =0.002).Univariate analysis revealed higher total RVUs (71.09 vs. 60.51, P <0.001), RVUs per minute (0.27 vs. 0.23, P <0.001), readmission rate (6.7% vs. 4.0%, P =0.012), and reoperation rate (7.5% vs. 3.3%, P <0.001) for the revision surgery group. Morbidity rates were found to be statistically similar. In addition, deep surgical site infection, pulmonary embolism, and urinary tract infection were more common in the revision group. After controlling for baseline differences in multivariate regression, the differences in total RVUs, RVUs per minute, reoperation rate, and rate of pulmonary embolism between primary and revision surgery remained statistically significant. Revision PSD surgery was found to be assigned appropriately higher mean total RVUs and RVUs per minute corresponding to the higher operative complexity compared with primary surgery. Revision surgery was also associated with poorer 30-day outcomes, including higher frequencies of reoperation and pulmonary embolism. Level III.

The effects of combined microwave ablation and open surgery for the treatment of lung cancer-derived thoracolumbar metastases.

ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical effects of microwave ablation (MWA) in addition to open surgery for the treatment of lung cancer‐derived thoracolumbar metastases.MethodsThis was a single‐institution, retrospective, cohort study. From January 2019 to December 2020, a total of 47 patients with lung cancer‐derived thoracolumbar metastases underwent posterior spinal canal decompression and fixation surgery in our hospital. Two independent surgical teams treated these patients. One group underwent open surgery combined with MWA therapy, while the other had open surgery only (control). The pre‐ and post‐operative visual analog scale (VAS) scores and the overall survival (OS) were compared between the MWA and control groups. The Frankel Grade classification was applied for the evaluation of the post‐surgical spinal cord function. Improvement was defined as an increase of at least one rank from the pre‐operative scores. Each patient was evaluated pre‐ and post‐operatively at 48 h, 1 month, and 3‐month intervals. Data on surgical‐related complications were recorded.ResultsThirty men and 17 women were included, with an average age of 57.9 ± 11.4 years (range, 26–81 years). Twenty‐eight patients underwent MWA and were in the MWA group, and 19 patients were included in the control group. Post‐operatively all patients were followed up regularly; the median follow‐up time was 12 months (range, 3–24 months), and their median OS was 14 months. Patients in the MWA group had a lower VAS score than those in the control group at the 48‐h (1.75 ± 1.01 vs 2.47 ± 0.96, P = 0.01) and 1‐month (1.79 ± 0.92 vs 2.53 ± 1.35, P = 0.048) check‐ups. At the 3‐month evaluation, the VAS score differences between the two groups were not significant (P = 0.133). After surgery, spinal cord function improvement was not significantly different between the MWA and control groups (P = 0.515). MWA therapy combined with open surgery was not associated with increased OS compared with the control group (P = 0.492).ConclusionMWA can be an effective and safe pain‐relief method but may not extend the OS of patients with lung cancer.