Posterior Pericardiotomy Research Articles

Impact of Posterior Pericardiotomy on Prevention of Post Operative Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Coronary Bypass Surgery

Impact of Posterior Pericardiotomy on Prevention of Post Operative Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Coronary Bypass Surgery

Posterior pericardiotomy and the prevention of post-operative atrial fibrillation and cardiac tamponade in isolated coronary artery bypass grafting – A retrospective analysis

BackgroundPost-Operative Atrial Fibrillation (POAF) is the most frequent complication of cardiac surgery and is associated with reduced survival, increased rates of cognitive changes and cerebrovascular accidents, heart failure, renal dysfunction, infection, length of stay and hospital costs. Cardiac tamponade although less common, carries high morbidity and mortality. Shed mediastinal blood in the pericardial space is a major source of intrapericardial oxidative stress and inflammation that triggers POAF. The utilisation of a posterior pericardiotomy (PP) aims to shunt blood from pericardium into the pleural space and have a role in the prevention of POAF as well as cardiac tamponade.Methods2168 patients had undergone isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting at Royal Hobart Hospital from 2008 to 2022. They were divided into PP group vs. control group. Patient baseline demographics, intraoperative data and post-operative outcomes were reviewed retrospectively.ResultsTotal incidence of new POAF and cardiac tamponade was 24% and 0.74% respectively. Primary outcome of both the incidence of POAF (20.2% vs. 26.3%, p < 0.05) and Cardiac Tamponade (0% vs. 1.1%, p < 0.05) were less in the pericardiotomy group. A subgroup analysis of patients with recent myocardial infarction showed reduced incidence of POAF in the PP group (p < 0.05). Increasing age, Body Mass Index, poor left ventricular ejection fraction (EF < 30%) and return to theatre were independent predictors of developing POAF. There were similar rates of return to theatre for bleeding however, no cases of tamponade in the pericardiotomy group. There were no complications attributable to left posterior pericardiotomy and the time added to the duration of surgery was minimal.ConclusionPosterior pericardiotomy is associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of POAF and cardiac tamponade which is safe and efficient.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Cardiac Society turnkey order set for prevention and management of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: Proceedings from the American Association for Thoracic Surgery ERAS Conclave 2023

BackgroundPostoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a prevalent complication following cardiac surgery that is associated with increased adverse events. Several guidelines and expert consensus documents have been published addressing the prevention and management of POAF. We aimed to develop an order set to facilitate widespread implementation and adoption of evidence-based practices for POAF following cardiac surgery. MethodsSubject matter experts were consulted to translate existing guidelines and literature into a sample turnkey order set (TKO) for POAF. Orders derived from consistent class I or IIA or equivalent recommendations across referenced guidelines and consensus manuscripts appear in the TKO in bold type. Selected orders that were inconsistently class I or IIA, class IIB, or supported by published evidence appear in italic type. ResultsPreoperatively, the recommendation is to screen patients for paroxysmal or chronic atrial fibrillation and initiate appropriate treatment based on individual risk stratification for the development of POAF. This may include the administration of beta-blockers or amiodarone, tailored to the patient's specific risk profile. Intraoperatively, surgical interventions such as posterior pericardiotomy should be considered in selected patients. Postoperatively, it is crucial to focus on electrolyte normalization, implementation strategies for rate or rhythm control, and anticoagulation management. These comprehensive measures aim to optimize patient outcomes and reduce the occurrence of POAF following cardiac surgery. ConclusionsDespite the well-established benefits of implementing a multidisciplinary care pathway for POAF in cardiac surgery, its adoption and implementation remain inconsistent. We have developed a readily applicable order set that incorporates recommendations from existing guidelines.

The Effect of Posterior Pericardiotomy on the Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery-Extended Follow-Up study (PALACS-EF): rationale and design.

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is the most common complication of cardiac surgery and has been associated with increased postoperative morbidity and hospital costs. The Posterior left pericardiotomy for the prevention of AtriaL fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery (PALACS) trial found that posterior pericardiotomy significantly reduced the incidence of POAF (17% vs. 32%, P < 0.001). We present the protocol for The Effect of Posterior Pericardiotomy on the Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery-Extended Follow-Up study (PALACS-EF): a prospective, extended follow-up of the original PALACS trial. The aim of PALACS-EF is to gain more data regarding the effect of posterior pericardiotomy on postdischarge clinical outcomes. The primary outcome is the time to the first occurrence of the composite of all-cause mortality or hospital cardiovascular readmission. The key secondary outcome is the time to the first occurrence of the composite of all-cause mortality and all-cause hospital readmission. Hospital readmission, myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischaemic attack, heart failure, systemic embolism, or new arrhythmias with onset since 30-day follow-up will also be recorded. All 420 patients enrolled in the PALACS trial will be included; extended follow-up will be conducted via telephone by blinded research personnel utilizing a standardized script to ensure uniformity and completeness of follow-up. If an event has occurred, documentation will be obtained, and an independent adjudication committee blinded to group assignment will adjudicate outcome events. Results will be reported when a median follow-up of 5 years is achieved. PALACS-EF will provide data to answer the question of whether posterior pericardiotomy improves postdischarge outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, and it will provide information on the relationship between POAF and adverse postdischarge outcomes including mortality, hospitalization, heart failure, and stroke. PALACS: NCT02875405, PALACS-EF: NCT05903222.

Posterior pericardial window: a simple and reproducible technique in order to prevent pericardial tamponade in paediatric cardiac surgery.

Pericardial tamponade, which increases postoperative mortality and morbidity, is still not uncommon after paediatric cardiac surgery. We considered that posterior pericardiotomy may be a useful and safe technique in order to reduce the incidence of early and late pericardial tamponade. Herein, we present our experience with creation of posterior pericardial window following congenital cardiac surgical procedures. This retrospective study evaluated 229 patients who underwent paediatric cardiac surgical procedures between June 2021 and January 2023. A posterior pericardial window was created in all of the patients. In neonates and infants, pericardial window was performed at a size of 2x2 cm, whereas a 3x3 cm connection was established in elder children and young adults. A curved chest tube was placed and positioned at the posterolateral pericardiophrenic sinus. An additional straight anterior mediastinal chest tube was also inserted in every patient. Transthoracic echocardiographic evaluations were performed daily to assess postoperative pericardial effusion. A total of 229 (135 male, 94 female) patients were operated. Mean age and body weight were 24.2 ± 26.7 months and 10.2 ± 6.7 kg, respectively. Eight (3.5%) of the patients were neonates where 109 (47.6%) were infants and 112 (48.9%) were in childhood. Fifty-two (22.7%) re-do operations were performed. Six (2.6%) patients underwent postoperative surgical re-exploration due to surgical site bleeding. Any early or late pericardial tamponade was not encountered in the study group. Posterior pericardial window is an effective and safe technique in order to prevent both the early and late pericardial tamponade after congenital cardiac surgery.

Non-Atriotomy Surgical Ablation Is Associated With a Reduction of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation

BackgroundPostoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is common after cardiac operations, and effective intraoperative techniques aimed at reducing POAF focus on limiting left atrial triggers through posterior pericardiotomy or pulmonary vein isolation. Prophylactic left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is increasingly used in hopes of preventing POAF-associated strokes. We sought to compare the incidence of POAF in patients undergoing prophylactic LAAO with or without a prophylactic non-atriotomy surgical ablation (NASA). MethodsA retrospective observational cohort comparison study of patients undergoing first-time isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with LAAO only (n = 90) or NASA+LAAO (n = 42) was conducted from July 2020 through November 2022. In-hospital POAF was defined by standard Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) definitions using 24-hour continuous telemetry and daily electrograms. Standard STS outcomes were also examined. Data are represented as mean ± SD. P values <.05 are considered significant. ResultsSTS-collected patient demographics, operative characteristics, and major complications did not differ significantly between cohorts. The rate of POAF (LAAO only, 41.1%; NASA+LAAO, 4.7%; P < .0001; odds ratio, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.016-0.27) and amiodarone on discharge (LAAO only, 42.5%; NASA+LAAO, 7.3%; P < .0001; odds ratio, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.03-0.33) differed significantly between cohorts. Total hospital costs were similar. ConclusionsIn patients with isolated coronary artery bypass grafting undergoing LAAO, a NASA is associated with a reduction of in-hospital POAF and need for antiarrhythmic medications on discharge. Future randomized prospective controlled studies are needed to prove safety and effectiveness.

Baseline Intraoperative Left Ventricular Diastolic Function Is Associated with Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation after Cardiac Surgery.

Detailed understanding of the association between intraoperative left atrial and left ventricular diastolic function and postoperative atrial fibrillation is lacking. In this post hoc analysis of the Posterior Left Pericardiotomy for the Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation after Cardiac Surgery (PALACS) trial, we aimed to evaluate the association of intraoperative left atrial and left ventricular diastolic function as assessed by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) with postoperative atrial fibrillation. PALACS patients with available intraoperative TEE data (n = 402 of 420; 95.7%) were included in this cohort study. We tested the hypotheses that preoperative left atrial size and function, left ventricular diastolic function, and their intraoperative changes were associated with postoperative atrial fibrillation. Normal left ventricular diastolic function was graded as 0 and with lateral e' velocity 10 cm/s or greater. Diastolic dysfunction was defined as lateral e' less than 10 cm/s using E/e' cutoffs of grade 1, E/e' 8 or less; grade, 2 E/e' 9 to 12; and grade 3, E/e' 13 or greater, along with two criteria based on mitral inflow and pulmonary wave flow velocities. A total of 230 of 402 patients (57.2%) had intraoperative diastolic dysfunction. Posterior pericardiotomy intervention was not significantly different between the two groups. A total of 99 of 402 patients (24.6%) developed postoperative atrial fibrillation. Patients who developed postoperative atrial fibrillation more frequently had abnormal left ventricular diastolic function compared to patients who did not develop postoperative atrial fibrillation (75.0% [n = 161 of 303] vs. 57.5% [n = 69 of 99]; P = 0.004). Of the left atrial size and function parameters, only delta left atrial area, defined as presternotomy minus post-chest closure measurement, was significantly different in the no postoperative atrial fibrillation versus postoperative atrial fibrillation groups on univariate analysis (-2.1 cm2 [interquartile range, -5.1 to 1.0] vs. 0.1 [interquartile range, -4.0 to 4.8]; P = 0.028). At multivariable analysis, baseline abnormal left ventricular diastolic function (odds ratio, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.15 to 3.63; P = 0.016) and pericardiotomy intervention (odds ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.78, P = 0.004) were the only covariates independently associated with postoperative atrial fibrillation. Baseline preoperative left ventricular diastolic dysfunction on TEE, not left atrial size or function, is independently associated with postoperative atrial fibrillation. Further studies are needed to test if interventions aimed at optimizing intraoperative left ventricular diastolic function during cardiac surgery may reduce the risk of postoperative atrial fibrillation.

Posterior pericardiotomy for the prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 25 randomised controlled trials.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) associated with postoperative pericardial effusion is the most commonly reported adverse event after cardiac surgery. We aimed to determine the role of posterior pericardiotomy in preventing postoperative AF (POAF). We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Ovid, and EBSCO from inception until 30 June 2022. We included randomised clinical trials (RCTs) that compared posterior pericardiotomy (PP) versus control (no PP) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The primary endpoint was the incidence of POAF after cardiac surgery. The secondary endpoints were supraventricular arrhythmias, early/late pericardial effusion, pericardial tamponade, pleural effusion, length of hospital/intensive care unit stay, intra-aortic balloon pump use, revision surgery for bleeding, and mortality. Twenty-five RCTs comprising 4,467 patients were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The overall incidence rate of POAF was 11.7% in the PP group compared with 23.67% in the no PP or control group, with a significant decrease in the risk of POAF following PP (odds ratio [OR] 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38-0.61). Compared with the control group, the risk of supraventricular tachycardia (OR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.43-0.89), early pericardial effusion (OR 0.32, 95% CI: 0.22-0.46), late pericardial effusion (OR 0.15, 95% CI: 0.09-0.25), and pericardiac tamponade (OR 0.18, 95% CI: 0.10-0.33) were lower in the PP group. PP is an effective intervention for reducing the risk of POAF after cardiac surgery. Also, PP is economically efficient in terms of decreasing the length of hospital stay.

Postoperative pericardial effusion, pericardiotomy, and atrial fibrillation: An explanatory analysis of the PALACS trial

In the Posterior left pericardiotomy for the prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery (PALACS) trial, posterior pericardiotomy was associated with a significant reduction in postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after cardiac surgery. We aimed to investigate the mechanisms underlying this effect. We included PALACS patients with available echocardiographic data (n=387/420, 92%). We tested the hypotheses that the reduction in POAF with the intervention was associated with 1) a reduction in postoperative pericardial effusion and/or 2) an effect on left atrial size and function. Spline and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used. Most patients (n=307, 79%) had postoperative pericardial effusions (anterior 68%, postero-lateral 51.9%). The incidence of postero-lateral effusion was significantly lower in patients undergoing pericardiotomy (37% vs 67%; P < .001). The median size of anterior effusion was comparable between patients with and without POAF (5.0 [IQR 3.0-7.0] vs 5.0 [IQR 3.0-7.5] mm; P=.42), but there was a nonsignificant trend towards larger postero-lateral effusion in the POAF group (5.0 [IQR 3.0-9.0] vs 4.0 [IQR 3.0-6.4] mm; P=.06). There was a non-linear association between postero-lateral effusion and POAF at a cut-off at 10 mm (OR 2.70; 95% CI 1.13, 6.47; P=.03) that was confirmed in multivariable analysis (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.17, 10.58; P=0.02). Left atrial dimension and function did not change significantly after posterior pericardiotomy. Reduction in postero-lateral pericardial effusion is a plausible mechanism for the effect of posterior pericardiotomy in reducing POAF. Measures to reduce postoperative pericardial effusion are a promising approach to prevent POAF.

Can Posterior Pericardial Incision Truly Improve Postoperative Complications After Cardiac Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) and pericardial effusion are important factors affecting prognosis after cardiac surgery. Recently, it has been reported that posterior pericardiotomy (PP) can effectively prevent the occurrence of POAF and pericardial effusion. To validate these conclusions and guide clinical practice, we conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis. We searched multiple databases for manuscripts published before July 2022 on the use of PP to prevent POAF and pericardial effusion and included only randomized controlled trials. The main outcome was atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting, and secondary outcomes were included. This meta-analysis included 14 randomized controlled trials with a total of 2275 patients. Meta-analysis showed that the incidence of POAF after cardiac surgery in the PP group was significantly lower than that in the control group (risk ratio=0.48; 95% confidence interval=0.33~0.69; P<0.00001). PP effectively reduced postoperative pericardial effusion (risk ratio=0.34, 95% confidence interval=0.21-0.55; P<0.00001). PP has shown good results in preventing POAF, pericardial effusion, and other complications, which indicates that PP is a safe and effective surgical method, but attention still needs to be paid to the potential risk of coagulation dysfunction caused by PP.

Benefit of Posterior Pericardiotomy in Heart Valve Surgery

Posterior pericardiotomy (PP) is helpful to prevent arrhythmia; especially atrial fibrillation (AF), and cardiac tamponade postoperative cardiac valve surgery. The incidence of postoperative AF is increased due to postoperative pericardial effusion (PE).

Characteristics of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation and the Effect of Posterior Pericardiotomy

BackgroundPostoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a frequent complication of cardiac surgery. However, only a few detailed descriptions of the arrhythmia have been reported. We aim to describe the characteristics, outcomes, and variables associated with POAF and to evaluate how posterior pericardiotomy (PP) affects POAF characteristics. MethodsIn this post hoc analysis of the Posterior left pericardiotomy for the prevention of AtriaL fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery (PALACS) trial, we describe POAF characteristics based on continuous in-hospital telemetry data. ResultsOf 420 patients, 103 (24.5%) developed POAF. Median time to onset was 50.3 hours; 70.9% of events occurred within 3 days. Hemodynamic instability and rapid ventricular response occurred in 8.7% and 51.5% of cases, respectively. Most POAF patients received antiarrhythmics (97.1%), 22.3% electrical cardioversion, and 40.8% systemic anticoagulation. Median POAF duration was 24.0 hours; 70.9% of cases resolved within 36 hours. Median POAF burden was 15.9%. All patients were in sinus rhythm at follow-up. POAF was associated with longer hospitalization (7 vs 6 days; P < .001), but not increased mortality or morbidity. PP reduced POAF incidence (17.7% vs 31.3%; P = .001), especially after postoperative day 2 (time to POAF onset 41.9 vs 57.1 hours; P = .01). Age was associated with POAF. Female sex, coronary artery bypass grafting, beta blockers, and PP were inversely associated. ConclusionsPOAF remains frequent after cardiac surgery. Hemodynamic instability is rare, although rapid ventricular response and need for electrical cardioversion are frequent. POAF burden is significant, and the arrhythmias resolve within 30 days. PP reduces POAF especially after postoperative day 2.

Influence of Posterior Pericardiotomy on Early and Late Pericardial Effusions Post CABG

Influence of Posterior Pericardiotomy on Early and Late Pericardial Effusions Post CABG

Preventive Role of Posterior Pericardiotomy in Early Post-Cardiac Surgery Atrial Fibrillation and Pericardial Collection

Preventive Role of Posterior Pericardiotomy in Early Post-Cardiac Surgery Atrial Fibrillation and Pericardial Collection

Risk and protective factors for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery and valvular interventions: an umbrella review of meta-analyses

ObjectivePostoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common complication affecting approximately one-third of patients after cardiac surgery and valvular interventions. This umbrella review systematically appraises the epidemiological credibility of published meta-analyses...

The effect of posterior pericardiotomy after thoracic aortic surgery

BackgroundPostoperative pericardial effusion is common after cardiovascular surgery. We aimed to examine the effectiveness of posterior pericardiotomy in reducing the incidence of postoperative pericardial effusion and postoperative atrial fibrillation after thoracic aortic surgery.MethodsThis study included 201 patients who underwent thoracic aortic open surgery between January 2014 and November 2021. We compared surgical outcomes between patients who underwent posterior pericardiotomy and those who did not.ResultsThe group that did not undergo posterior pericardiotomy had significantly longer mechanical ventilation duration than the group who did, both in the overall (p = 0.005) and in the propensity-matched cohorts (p = 0.001). The lengths of intensive care unit and hospital stays were significantly longer in the group that did not undergo posterior pericardiotomy compared to the group that did, both in the overall and in the propensity-matched cohorts. The occurrence of postoperative atrial fibrillation and stroke did not differ significantly between the two groups. The amount of pericardial drainage was not significantly lower in the group that underwent posterior pericardiotomy in the overall cohorts (p = 0.09), but the difference was significant in the propensity-matched cohorts (p = 0.04). The amount of mediastinal drainage was significantly lower in the group that underwent posterior pericardiotomy, both in the overall cohorts (< 0.001) and in the propensity-matched cohort (< 0.001). Late pericardial tamponade occurred significantly more frequently in the group that did not undergo posterior pericardiotomy than in the group that did, both in the overall (p = 0.03) and in the propensity-matched cohorts (p = 0.03).ConclusionsPosterior pericardiotomy has no effect on reducing postoperative atrial fibrillation after thoracic aortic surgery. However, posterior pericardiotomy reduced the occurrence of late pericardial tamponade, length of ICU stay, length of hospital stay, and mechanical ventilation duration after surgery.

Transsternal and Transpericardial Approach to Descending Thoracic Aorta via Median Sternotomy-An Option for Extensive Aortic Surgery.

We describe a technique for approaching the distal descending thoracic aorta via median sternotomy and posterior pericardiotomy, which enabled us to perform the extensive aortic repair. While this approach shared the lesser invasiveness of the frozen elephant trunk procedure with less confinement by anatomic features, the advantage was counterbalanced by the high incidence of spinal cord ischemia. This approach can be an option in highly selected patients who require extensive aortic repair but have factors prohibiting other conventional approaches.

Posterior pericardiotomy in heart valve surgery; is it still performed or neglected?

Background: Posterior pericardiotomy (PP) is helpful to prevent arrhythmia; especially atrial fibrillation (AF), and cardiac tamponade postoperative cardiac valve surgery. The incidence of postoperative AF is increased due to postoperative pericardial effusion (PE). This study aimed to investigate the early outcome of PP after heart valve surgery. Methods: In this prospective study, 120 patients underwent elective valve heart surgery at our center from January 2020 until April 2022. Patients were followed up for AF and pericardial effusion, and reopening due to tamponade. Results: The mean age of patients was 35.26 years, 70.2% were female and 29.8% were male. Surgery was elective and all were valve surgery. The incidence of postoperative AF was 2%, and pericardial effusion was seen in 1% of patients. Tamponade was not seen in any case. Left PE needed intervention tube drainage of 2%. Conclusion: Posterior pericardiotomy is a simple and safe procedure during valve heart surgery, and it is effective in reducing the incidence of atrial fibrillation, pericardial effusion, and tamponade.

The Role of Posterior Pericardiotomy on The Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation and Pericardial Effusion after Coronary Revascularization

The Role of Posterior Pericardiotomy on The Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation and Pericardial Effusion after Coronary Revascularization

PO-654-03 POSTERIOR PERICARDIOTOMY TO PREVENT POST-OPERATIVE ATRIAL FIBRILLATION AFTER CARDIAC SURGERY

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common complication following cardiac surgery. Posterior pericardiotomy (PP) is a simple surgical method that reduces the risk of POAF because it allows drainage of pericardial fluid into the left pleural space, reducing the incidence of pericardial effusion that may trigger POAF.