Posterior Lumbar Research Articles

The drainage volume control by elevation of drainage height versus head down tilt in supine position for management of cerebrospinal fluid leakage following lumbar posterior surgery.

To compare the clinical outcomes of control of drainage volume through either elevating the drainage height or tilting the head down in a supine position for the management of cerebrospinal fluid leakage (CSFL) following posterior lumbar surgery. A retrospective analysis was conducted to review the data of patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery at a single hospital over a 4-year period from January 2020 to December 2023. Postoperative CSFL and complications were recorded. All patients with CSFL were managed with bed rest, a 20-30° head-down tilt position, or a drainage system elevated by 10cm, along with subfascial drains, for a duration of 3days. The clinical outcomes of drainage volume control were compared between the elevation of the drainage system and the head-down tilt position in the supine posture. The incidence of CSFL after lumbar surgeries was 1.2% (84 out of 7,284 cases). None of the CSFL patients experienced significant complications or required reoperation. When compared to the traditional Trendelenburg position, elevating the drainage height reduced the incidence of headache and dizziness, as well as shortened the time to ambulation, postoperative defecation time, and postoperative hospital stay, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). Postoperative drainage volume control using the Trendelenburg position or elevation of the drainage height is both safe and effective for the management of CSFL. The method involving a 10cm elevation of the drainage system appears to be an easier and more clinically acceptable approach for the nursing care of CSFL following posterior lumbar surgery.

Clinical Comparison of Endoscopic Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Open Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Treating Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.

A retrospective case-control study. To compare the clinical efficacy of endoscopic (Endo) and open posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in treating lumbar spondylolisthesis. Endo-PLIF has emerged as a new technique for treating lumbar spondylolisthesis. We propose Endo-PLIF as an alternative method. Sixty-four patients with single-segment lumbar spondylolisthesis underwent Endo-PLIF (n = 39) or open PLIF (n = 25) treatment. Demographic data, perioperative parameters, and radiographic parameters were recorded. Clinical results were evaluated by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. The fusion rate was evaluated by computed tomography at 12 months postoperatively. In addition, a case-control process was included to ensure unbiased comparisons. The average operation time was longer in the Endo-PLIF group. Endo-PLIF showed advantages in reducing blood loss, shortening hospital stay, and early ambulation, but with a longer x-ray exposure time. Both VAS and ODI scores significantly improved in both groups, but the VAS for back pain was lower in the Endo-PLIF group. The radiographic results were similar in both groups. Three patients in the Endo-PLIF group had minor complications. Two patients in the open PLIF group experienced cerebrospinal fluid leakage. Both VAS and ODI scores significantly improved in both groups compared with preoperative scores, but the Endo-PLIF group showed more significant improvement at early follow-up (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in interbody fusion rate between the two groups. Both Endo-PLIF and open PLIF are effective for treating single-segment lumbar spondylolisthesis. Endo-PLIF shows advantages in reducing blood loss, shortening hospital stays, and promoting early ambulation, with comparable fusion rates and patient satisfaction to open PLIF. Despite minor complications in the Endo-PLIF group and cerebrospinal fluid leakage in the open PLIF group, both procedures lead to significant improvements in pain and disability scores, with Endo-PLIF demonstrating more significant early improvements.

Mid-term efficacy of non-contact orthopedic robot navigation in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis

ObjectiveThis study was aimed to explore the mid-term efficacy of non-contact orthopedic robot navigation in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis.MethodsThe clinical data of young and middle-aged patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis were retrospectively analyzed and divided into an observation group and a control group according to surgical methods. The observation group was treated with minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) combined with orthopedic robot-navigated percutaneous pedicle screw fixation; while the control group underwent traditional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Perioperative indicators, waist and leg pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and complications were compared between groups.ResultsA total of 32 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis were included in this study, with the average age of 50.3 ± 2.7 years old. There were 17 patients in the observation group and 15 patients in the control group. Although the new surgical technique for the observation group may require longer operative time, it showed significant advantages in reducing intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage, and shortening hospital stay. These benefits might result in faster recovery for patients, reduced risk of complications, and improved overall quality of life. The new technology was also significantly better compared to the traditional method in terms of VAS scores and ODI at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-surgery. These results provided patients with better treatment options and potentially a faster path to recovery. One case with infectious incision in the observation group and one case with intraspinal hematoma formation in the control group were observed. However, there was no statistical difference in the complication rates between the two groups (P > 0.05).ConclusionThe non-contact orthopedic robot navigation for the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis was demonstrated to be minimally invasive, precise, and stable surgical method. It is a treatment option worth considering for suitable patients.

Multifidus Degeneration: The Key Imaging Predictor of Adjacent Segment Disease.

Retrospective cohort study. To identify imaging predictors on pre- and perioperative imaging that are associated with a future revision surgery for adjacent segment disease (ASD) following lumbar fusion. Patients undergoing open posterior lumbar fusion between 2014-2022 were followed-up for >2-year. The initial MRI was evaluated for disc degeneration by Pfirrmann (grade 1-5); Modic changes (0-3); as well as fatty infiltration and functional cross-sectional area (fCSA) of the multifidus, erector spinae, and psoas. Spinopelvic alignment was measured pre- and postoperatively. Of 216 patients, 14.8% (n = 32) required revision surgery for ASD in the further course. There were no significant differences in Modic changes or Pfirrmann grades between the ASD group and controls. Fatty infiltration was significantly higher in the ASD group for both the erector spinae (40.5% vs 36.9%, P = 0.043) and multifidus muscles (61.0% vs 53.9%, P = 0.003). Additionally, the multifidus fCSA was smaller in patients who developed ASD (5.7cm2 vs 6.7cm2). Pre- and postoperative spinopelvic parameters were not significantly different between groups, and no other MRI measurements showed a significant difference. In a multivariable logistic regression model adjusting for age and sex, multifidus fatty infiltration emerged as the only significant predictor of ASD revision surgery (P = 0.004). Patients with more than 58% multifidus fatty infiltration had over double the risk of developing ASD (OR 2.7, 95% CI: 1.1-6.5, P = 0.032). Multifidus fatty infiltration is the key imaging predictor for the development of ASD requiring surgical revision. Disc degeneration and spinopelvic alignment appear to have less impact.

Inflammatory bowel disease is associated with greater odds of complications following posterior lumbar fusion and further amplified for patients exposed to biologics

Inflammatory bowel disease is associated with greater odds of complications following posterior lumbar fusion and further amplified for patients exposed to biologics

[Translated article] Thrombotic Event Prevention in Patients Undergoing Posterior Lumbar Arthrodesis: our experiencie. A retrospective case series study

There is no generalized consensus regarding perioperative prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE), either on using or timing it in patients undergoing spine surgery. VTE is a current concern because, even though being an uncommon event, it can cause serious complications. The aim of the present study is to propose guidelines for the prevention of thrombotic events in posterior spinal surgery, either as deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary thromboembolism. If the number of patients getting prophylaxis drugs is reduced a subsequent reduction of the incidence of epidural hematoma can be expected. A number of 235 patients who had undergone posterior spinal arthrodesis in the previous five years were studied. Mechanical thromboprophylaxis measures consisting of compression stockings were applied in all of them. Anticoagulant drugs were also applied whenever risk factors for thrombosis were observed. Early weight-bearing was resumed immediately after surgery. Demographic, clinical, and surgical variables were collected, as well as complications appearing during the follow-up period, that was scheduled at one, two, four, six and twelve months after the surgery. Thrombotic events, if present, were diagnosed by clinical and imaging tests such as ultrasound and CT angiography. From the total 235 patients of this series, one hundred and fifty-three cases met the study inclusion criteria. A total of four thrombotic events appeared, one in the form of deep vein thrombosis and other three in the form of pulmonary thromboembolism. These last patients suffering an embolism died because of it. None of the variables studied had statistical significance for the occurrence of a thrombotic event. All four patients who suffered thrombotic events were receiving anticoagulant drugs, in addition to mechanical compression stockings, because of the presence of risk factors for thrombosis. By applying the fore mentioned protocol, adequate prevention of thromboembolic events was achieved in this study population of patients undergoing posterior spinal surgery.

Semaglutide utilization associated with reduced ninety-day postoperative complications following single-level posterior lumbar fusion for patients with type II diabetes

Background ContextSemaglutide (the active agent in medications such as Ozempic®) has emerged as an increasingly popular medication in the management of diabetes due to its superior clinical efficacy compared with other medications. Patients undergoing surgery, such as posterior lumbar fusion (PLF), may be on these medications for type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM). While the correlation of T2DM with inferior PLF outcomes is known, considering the potential impact of semaglutide on the odds of postoperative complications has not previously been characterized. PurposeTo investigate the potential correlation of semaglutide on 90-day postoperative adverse events following single-level PLF for those with T2DM who are or are not concurrently taking insulin. Study Design/SettingA retrospective cohort study utilizing the 2010 – Q2 2022 M161Ortho PearlDiver Mariner Patient Claims Database. Patient SampleT2DM patients (with or without concurrent insulin use) undergoing single-level PLF (with or without interbody fusion) were identified using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Exclusion criteria included: patients less than 18 years of age, those undergoing concurrent cervical, thoracic, anterior, or multi-level fusion procedures, and those with trauma, neoplasm, or infection diagnosed within three months of surgery. Outcome MeasuresIncidence of 90-day aggregated any, severe, and minor adverse events (AAE, SAE, and MAE, respectively), emergency department (ED) visits, and hospital readmissions. MethodsPatients with a prior diagnosis of T2DM not using insulin (T2DM-insulin) and T2DM concurrently using insulin (T2DM+insulin) undergoing PLF were identified. Patients within each group who utilized semaglutide in the year prior to surgery were identified and matched 1:4 with non-semaglutide T2DM-insulin and non-semaglutide T2DM+insulin patients, respectively, based on age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI), obesity, tobacco use, metformin use, and sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) use. The incidence of 90-day adverse events between groups was compared by univariate and multivariate analyses. Bonferroni correction was utilized to reduce the risk of type I error. ResultsOf all T2DM patients undergoing PLF, semaglutide use was noted for 227 (0.73%) of T2DM-insulin patients, and 244 (2.17%) of T2DM+insulin patients. Once matched, there were 191 and 148 in the semaglutide groups, respectively.For the PLF T2DM-insulin analysis, those using semaglutide were at significantly lower odds of AAE (odds ratio [OR] 0.43), MAE (OR 0.45), and ED visits (OR 0.34) (p<0.001 for all), but not of SAEs or readmissions.For the PLF T2DM+insulin analysis, those using semaglutide were at significantly lower odds of AAE (OR 0.40, p<0.001), SAE (OR 0.43, p=0.004), MAE (OR 0.34, p<0.001), and ED visits (OR 0.26, p<0.001), but not readmissions. ConclusionsThe current study found consistent reductions in aggregated 90-day adverse events, but similar odds of hospital readmission for T2DM patients undergoing PLF taking semaglutide preoperatively. These encouraging findings of reduced postoperative complications suggest further prospective analysis, as the observed findings suggest clinical benefit to semaglutide being utilized by the studied patient population.

Can abdominal aortic calcification detected on lateral lumbar radiography predict instrument-related complications in patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion?

Objective: Abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) is well known as a useful and simple clinical indicator of the risk of fracture and cardiovascular disease. However, no studies have directly compared the postoperative implications of AAC in spinal surgery. The purpose of this study was thus to examine whether extended AAC (scores ≥5) negatively affected clinical outcomes after posterior lumbar fusion with instrumentation for degenerative lumbar stenosis or degenerative spondylolisthesis.Methods: The subjects comprised 101 consecutive patients with spinal stenosis or degenerative spondylolisthesis who underwent posterior lumbar fusion and instrumentation between January 2016 and January 2019 and were followed for over 2 years. Propensity score matching was employed to assemble patient groups with similar baseline characteristics. Postoperative complications and radiologic outcomes were compared between the groups (33 patients in each) divided by extended AAC score.Results: The incidence rates of junctional failure (6.1% vs. 30.3%, P=0.008) and screw-related complications (12.1% vs. 36.4%, P=0.019) were higher in the extended AAC group than in the mild AAC group. However, the rates of adjacent segment disease (24.2% vs. 36.4%, P=0.283) and revision (6.1% vs. 9.1%, P=0.642) were not significantly different between the 2 groups. In terms of postoperative medical complications, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases were significantly more common in the extended AAC group than in the mild AAC group (0% vs. 15.2%, P=0.020).Conclusion: Extended AAC indicates increased risk for postoperative junctional failure and screw-related complications, regardless of age, osteoporosis, and comorbidities.

Impact of an In-Hospital postoperative imaging after uncomplicated elective posterior lumbar fixation: A case series

Purpose: Following spinal fixation, postoperative imaging is routinely performed. The value of routine postoperative imaging and its impact on the surgical decision remains uncertain, especially in degenerative cases. Moreover, routine postoperative imaging is not free and is an ionizing radiation. This study investigated the value of postoperative imaging after uneventful uncomplicated elective posterior lumbar fixation. Methods: This case series retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent elective posterior lumbar fixation surgeries at our institution within two years. A series of 98 cases met our selection criteria. Their mean age was 51.2 years. We reviewed the decisions taken after performing the routine postoperative images. We searched for further diagnostic or imaging studies, revision surgery, or an extended hospital stay. Results: We found no particular decision was made after performing the postoperative imaging after uneventful uncomplicated elective posterior lumbar fixation surgeries. Moreover, there was no change in the hospital stay or the regular postoperative clinical management for all the included patients. No revision surgery was required based on the postoperative routine images. Conclusions: We found that routine postoperative imaging after posterior fixation of a degenerative lumbar spine is of limited value. A randomized, controlled study is helpful to confirm this finding.

Development and Validation of Deep Learning Preoperative Planning Software for Automatic Lumbosacral Screw Selection Using Computed Tomography

Achieving precise pedicle screw placement in posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is essential but difficult due to the intricacies of manual preoperative planning with CT scans. We analyzed CT data from 316 PLIF patients, using Mimics software for manual planning by two surgeons. A deep learning model was trained on 228 patients and validated on 88 patients, assessing planning efficiency and accuracy. Automatic planning successfully segmented and placed screws in all 316 cases, significantly outperforming manual planning in speed. The Dice coefficient for segmentation accuracy was 0.95. The difference in mean pedicle transverse angle (PTA) and pedicle sagittal angle (PSA) for automatic planning screws compared to manual planning screws was 1.63 ± 0.83° and 1.39 ± 1.03°, respectively, and these differences were either statistically comparable or not significantly different compared to the variability of manual planning screws. The average Dice coefficient of implanted screws was 0.63 ± 0.08, and the consistency between automatic screws and manual reference screws was higher than that of internal screws (Dice 0.62 ± 0.09). Compared with manual screws, automatic screws were shorter (46.58 ± 3.09 mm) and thinner (6.24 ± 0.35 mm), and the difference was statistically significant. In qualitative validation, 97.7% of the automatic planning screws were rated Gertzbein–Robbins (GR) Class A and 97.3% of the automatic planning screws were rated Badu Class 0. Deep learning software automates lumbosacral pedicle screw planning, enhancing surgical efficiency and accuracy.

A case of consecutive four-level lumbar spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis

This rare and unusual case is about a 54-year-old female, who has pars fractures involving consecutive four-level bilateral spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Due to the increasing intensity with lumbar instability, the patient had severe low back pain. For diagnosis, dynamic X-ray, magnetic resonance, 3D tomography were performed, and bilateral L2-3-4-5 pars fracture and L3-4 spondylolisthesis were observed. This case was treated surgically byspinal canal decompression at L3-4, L4-5 and L5-S1, posterior lumbar interbody fusion at L4–5 and L5–S1, and pedicle screw fixation at L2–S1. The lower back pain disappeared after the surgery.

Structural design and biomechanical analysis of a combined titanium and polyetheretherketone cage based on PE-PLIF fusion.

In lumbar spinal fusion, the titanium cage tends to cause stress shielding due to their high elastic modulus, which can lead to degenerative lesions in adjacent spinal segments. Furthermore, polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages have certain material characteristics that do not promote bone ingrowth and fusion stability. In this study, a new cage was designed, and its biomechanical performance in percutaneous endoscopic posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PE-PLIF) was analyzed using the finite element (FE) method. A complete model of the L4-L5 lumbar spine was established, and static and harmonic vibration FE analysis models were developed based on it. The biomechanical properties of titanium, PEEK, and combined cage in PE-PLIF fusion were compared. The strain capacity of the combined fusion increased by 9.5% when compared to the titanium fusion. The surgical model under the combined fusion reduces the L5 endplate stress by 12% in the forward flexion condition and the fusion stress by 17% in the vibration condition compared to the model supported by the titanium fusion, and the differences in screw stress and mobility among the three models are not significant in multiple conditions. Consequently, the combined cage demonstrates a certain reduction in the stress-shielding effect when compared to the titanium cage; it has better fusion effect and provides theoretical support and guidance for the design of the clinical fusion cage.

Observation of the effect of single dose intravenous infusion of tranexamic acid on white blood cell, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein after double segmental posterior lumbar interbody fusion

To observe the safety and effectiveness of single dose intravenous infusion of tranexamic acid (TXA) in dual level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), and to explore the changes and trends in perioperative white blood cell (WBC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP). Between October 2020 and September 2022, 46 patients with lumbar degenerative disease were treated with dual level PLIF, including 18 males and 28 females, with an average age of (60.24±10.68) years old, from 34 to 80 years old. They were divided into observation group and control group according to different treatment methods. There were 28 patients in the observation group, including 12 males and 16 females, with an average age of (61.04 ± 9.03) years old. There were 3 cases with lumbar disc herniation (LDH), lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) 18 cases, lumbar spondylolisthesis (LS) 7 cases. TXA (1 g/100 ml) was administered intravenously 15 min before skin incision after general anesthesia. The control group consisted of 18 patients, including 6 males and 12 females, with an average age of (59.00±13.04) years old. There were 5 cases with LDH, LSS 9 cases, LS 4 cases, and TXA was not used. The operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative drainage volume, postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT), postoperative hospital stay, postoperative activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), prothrombin time (PT), thrombin time (TT), fibrinogen (FIB), platelet (PLT), red blood cell (RBC), hemoglobin (HB), hematocrit (HCT), the first day, the fourth day, the seventh day and the last tested after operation WBC, ESR and CRP were recorded. The postoperative wounds of the patients healed well and there was no DVT. 46 patients were followed up from 3 to 6 months. The intraoperative blood loss was 400.0 (300.0, 500.0) ml and the postoperative drainage was 260.0 (220.0, 450.0) ml in the observation group, which were lower than the control group[600.0(400.0, 1000.0) ml, 395.0 (300.0, 450.0) ml], P<0.05. There was no significant difference between the two groups in operation time, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative APTT, PT, TT, FIB, PLT, RBC, HB, HCT, and postoperative WBC, ESR and CRP at different times (P>0.05). Single dose intravenous infusion of TXA can reduce the blood loss of bi-segmental PLIF, and has no significant effect on WBC, ESR and CRP after operation.

Implementing enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in elderly patients following multi-level posterior lumbar or thoracolumbar instrumented fusion for degenerative diseases.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is an evidence-based multimodal perioperative management strategy. The aim of the present study was to analyze the clinical efficacy of ERAS in elderly patients (> 70 years old) undergoing multi-level posterior lumbar or thoracolumbar instrumented fusion for degenerative diseases. Patients older than 70 years undergoing multi-level lumbar or thoracolumbar instrumented fusion for degenerative disk diseases or spinal stenosis from January 2017 to December 2018 (non-ERAS group) and from January 2020 to December 2021 (ERAS group) were enrolled in present study. Patient-specific and procedure-specific clinical characteristics were collected. Univariate and multivariate regression were performed to determine the risk factors related to length of stay (LOS) and complications. A total of 233 patients were enrolled in this study, 70 in non-ERAS group and 163 in ERAS group. There were comparable baseline characteristics between groups. Further there were no significant differences in 90-day readmission rates and complication rates. However, we observed a significant reduction in LOS (14.89 ± 7.78 days in non-ERAS group versus 11.67 ± 7.26 days in ERAS group, p = 0.002) and overall number of complications (38 in non-ERAS group versus 58 in ERAS group, p = 0.008). Univariate linear regression denoted that operation time (p < 0.001), intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.001), intraoperative blood transfusion (p < 0.001), fusion number ≥ 5 (p < 0.001), spinal surgery including the thoracic spine (p < 0.001), CCI > 2 (p = 0.018), ERAS (p = 0.003) and spinal surgery including lumbar (p = 0.030) were associated with LOS. Furthermore, multivariate linear regression showed that ERAS (p = 0.001), CCI > 2 (p = 0.014), and Fusion number ≥ 5 (p = 0.002) were independent risk factors for LOS. Analogously, univariate logistic regression revealed that longer operation time (p = 0.005), more intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.001), more intraoperative blood transfusion (p = 0.001), fusion number ≥ 5 (p = 0.001), ERAS (p = 0.004) and spinal surgery including thoracic spine (p = 0.002) were related to complications, while implementing ERAS was associated with less complications. Multivariate logistic regression denoted that implementation of ERAS (p = 0.003), Intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.003) and Fusion number ≥ 5 (p = 0.008) were independent risk factors for postoperative complications. In conclusion, the present study reported the first ERAS principles performed in multi-level lumbar or thoracolumbar instrumented fusion for degenerative conditions. Our outcomes shown that the implementation of ERAS in these populations is favorable for reducing LOS and decreasing overall number of complications though the comparable complication rates between two groups. Totally, our ERAS protocols were safe and feasible in these populations.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols in One- or Two-Level Posterior Lumbar Fusion: Improving Postoperative Outcomes.

Background/Objectives: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols optimize perioperative care and improve recovery. This study evaluated the effectiveness of ERAS in one- or two-level posterior lumbar fusion surgeries, focusing on perioperative medication use, pain management, and functional outcomes. Methods: Eighty-eight patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery between March 2021 and February 2022 were allocated into pre-ERAS (n = 41) and post-ERAS (n = 47) groups. Outcomes included opioid and antiemetic consumption, pain scores (numerical rating scale (NRS)), functional recovery (Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D)), and complication rates. Pain was assessed daily for the first four postoperative days and at 6 months. Linear Mixed Effects Model analysis evaluated pain trajectories. Results: The post-ERAS group showed significantly lower opioid (p = 0.005) and antiemetic (p < 0.001) use. No significant differences were observed in NRS pain scores in the first 4 postoperative days. At 6 months, the post-ERAS group reported significantly lower leg pain (p = 0.002). The time:group interaction was not significant for back (p = 0.848) or leg (p = 0.503) pain. Functional outcomes at 6 months, particularly ODI and EQ-5D scores, showed significant improvement in the post-ERAS group. Complication rates were lower in the post-ERAS group (4.3% vs. 19.5%, p = 0.024), while hospital stay and fusion rates remained similar. Conclusions: The ERAS protocol significantly reduced opioid and antiemetic use, improved long-term pain management and functional recovery, and lowered complication rates in lumbar fusion patients. These findings support the implementation of ERAS protocols in spinal surgery, emphasizing their role in enhancing postoperative care.

Novel Technique for Degenerative Lumbar Spine Fusion: Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation Combined with Contralateral Interbody Cage Fusion for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Abstract Objective The common traditional surgical techniques for posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and fixation are bilateral pedicle screw fixation with or without interbody cage fusion and unilateral pedicle screw fixation with ipsilateral cage fusion. However, the novel unilateral pedicle screw fixation combined with the contralateral interbody cage fusion technique may provide the benefits and avoid the hazards of those traditional techniques. This prospective randomized comparative clinical trial aims to compare pedicle screw fixation with contralateral interbody cage fusion and unilateral pedicle screw fixation with ipsilateral cage fusion in single-level PLIF and fixation. Methods This comparative prospective study was conducted on 60 patients subjected to a single-level PLIF and unilateral pedicle screw fixation during the period from January 2022 to July 2022 to compare two different surgical modalities: group A (unilateral pedicle screw fixation with contralateral interbody cage fusion) and group B (unilateral pedicle screw fixation with ipsilateral cage fusion). Results Operative time, blood loss, operative complications, and visual analog scale improvements showed insignificant differences between the two groups, while group A showed significant improvements in the Oswestry Disability Index and wider coronal disc heights contralateral to the screw, which is the side of the cages, during postoperative follow-up. Conclusion Unilateral pedicle screw fixation with contralateral cage fusion during the PLIF and pedicle screw fixation procedure is preferred to maintain bilateral coronal disc heights and thus better clinical and mechanical results without affection of the preceding disc.

Is It Enough to Stop Distal Fusion at L3 in Mild to Moderate Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients?

There has been no definitive conclusion on the selection of the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) in Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether it is enough to stop distal fusion at L3 in mild to moderate Lenke 5C AIS patients with posterior selective lumbar fusion, Ponte osteotomies and segmental direct vertebra rotation and to analyze the risk factors for postoperative complications in patients selecting L3 as the LIV. A retrospective review was conducted on 106 Lenke 5C AIS patients who underwent corrective surgery in our institution from 2010 to 2021, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. The LIV was L3 or L4. According to the LIV, patients were initially divided into Group I (the LIV was L3) and Group II (the LIV was L4). Then, Group I was further divided into a complication group and a non-complication group. Demographics, radiological parameters, postoperative complications, and clinical outcomes were recorded. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic analysis were used to identify the risk factors for postoperative complications in patients with L3 as the LIV. There were no significant differences in the demographics, radiological parameters, postoperative complications, or clinical outcomes between Group I and Group II (p > 0.05), and the outcomes were satisfactory in both groups. The main postoperative complications were distal adding-on (11 cases), coronal imbalance (16 cases), proximal junctional kyphosis (2 cases), and internal fixation failure (4 cases). Logistic regression analysis revealed that age and postoperative C7-CSVL were independent predictors of postoperative complications when selecting L3 as the LIV. Terminating the distal fusion level at L3 was practical for mild to moderate Lenke 5C AIS patients. For patients selecting L3 as the LIV, younger patients should be cautious, and maintaining postoperative coronal balance is necessary for avoiding postoperative complications.

Exploratory Randomised Trial of Tranexamic Acid to Decrease Postoperative Delirium in Adults Undergoing Lumbar Fusion: A trial stopped early.

Postoperative delirium may be mediated by perioperative systemic- and neuro-inflammation. By inhibiting the pro-inflammatory actions of plasmin, tranexamic acid (TXA) may decrease postoperative delirium. To explore this hypothesis, we modified an ongoing randomised trial of TXA, adding measures of postoperative delirium, cognitive function, systemic cytokines, and astrocyte activation. Adults undergoing elective posterior lumbar fusion randomly received intraoperative intravenous TXA (n=43: 10 mg kg -1 loading dose, 2 mg kg -1 h -1 infusion) or Placebo (n=40). Blood was collected pre- and at 24 h post-operatively (n=32) for biomarkers of systemic inflammation (cytokines) and astrocyte activation (S100B). Participants had twice daily delirium assessments using the 3-minute diagnostic interview for Confusion Assessment Method (n=65). Participants underwent 4 measures of cognitive function preoperatively and during post-discharge follow-up. Delirium incidence in the TXA group (7/32=22%) was not significantly less than in the Placebo group (11/33=33%); P =0.408, absolute difference=11%, relative difference=33%, effect size = -0.258 (95% CI -0.744 to 0.229). In the Placebo group (n=16), delirium severity was associated with the number of instrumented vertebral levels ( P =0.001) and with postoperative interleukin -8 and -10 concentrations ( P =0.00008 and P =0.005, respectively) and these associations were not significantly modified by TXA. In the Placebo group, delirium severity was associated with S100B concentration ( P =0.0009) and the strength of the association was decreased by TXA ( P =0.002). A potential 33% relative decrease in postoperative delirium incidence justifies an adequately powered clinical trial to determine if intraoperative TXA decreases delirium in adults undergoing lumbar fusion.

The geriatric nutritional risk index predicts blood transfusion risk in elderly patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective study

BackgroundMalnutrition can lead to an increased risk of blood transfusion in elderly patients. The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) is a tool used to assess nutritional status, but its predictive value for blood transfusion in elderly patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is not well established. This study aimed to investigate the association between GNRI and the risk of perioperative blood transfusion in this population.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted on elderly patients aged 60 and above who underwent PLIF at Qingdao University Affiliated Hospital. Preoperative GNRI was calculated using height, weight, and serum albumin levels. The primary outcome was perioperative blood transfusion. Logistic regression analysis was performed, adjusting for potential confounders such as demographic characteristics, comorbidities, surgical factors, and laboratory tests.ResultsA total of 1,246 elderly patients were included, with 144 (11.6%) requiring blood transfusion. After adjusting for all confounders, a lower GNRI was associated with a significantly higher risk of blood transfusion (OR = 2.4, 95% CI: 1.9–3.1, p < 0.001). Patients with a GNRI score below 92 had a significantly increased transfusion risk compared to those with normal GNRI scores (OR = 5.8, 95% CI: 3.7–9.1, p < 0.05). RCS analysis revealed a linear negative relationship between GNRI and transfusion risk.ConclusionThe GNRI is a strong predictor of perioperative blood transfusion risk in elderly patients undergoing PLIF. Preoperative nutritional assessment using GNRI may help identify high-risk patients, enabling tailored interventions to optimize outcomes.

Comparison of Hounsfield Unit, Vertebral Bone Quality, and Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry T-Score for Predicting Cage Subsidence After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Retrospective cohort study. To compare Hounsfield unit (HU), vertebral bone quality (VBQ), and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) T-score in predicting cage subsidence (CS) after posterior lumbar interbody fusion. We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing PLIF and measured L4 HU and VBQ. Baseline characteristics between CS and non-CS groups were compared. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for CS. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to explore the predictive value of variables for CS. Subgroup analysis was conducted for patients with available DEXA results. Eighty-four patients were analyzed. The subsidence group was older, with lower L4 HU (92.6 (35.4) vs 130.8 (47.8), P < 0.001) and higher VBQ (3.30 (0.64) vs 2.99 (0.63), P = 0.041) compared to the non-CS group. Low L4 HU (OR 0.979, P = 0.022) was an independent risk factor for subsidence, while VBQ was not. ROC analysis indicated that L4 HU (AUC = 0.733, P < 0.001) exhibited superior predictive performance compared to VBQ (AUC = 0.643, P = 0.032). Subgroup analysis in patients with DEXA showed that the femoral neck T-score (AUC = 0.67, P = 0.037) could differentiate CS, with L4 HU exhibiting the highest predictive ability (AUC = 0.778, P < 0.001), both outperforming VBQ (AUC = 0.645, P = 0.075). Among the three BMD parameters, only low L4 HU could be an independent risk factor for CS. Preoperative HU is mandatory in patients at risk for osteoporosis when undergoing spine surgery.