Abstract Background Performing linear ablation such as roof line, inferior line in the posterior part of LA and posterior mitral isthmus (MI) line in addition to PVI is one of the strategies for treating persistent atrial fibrillation. However, remnant conduction or reconnection in the lines is linked with atrial arrhythmia recurrence, either AF or AT. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is often unsuccessful achieving durable linear ablation. It is not yet well known whether using pulsed field ablation (PFA) would be superior in achieving complete linear lesions. Purpose We sought to evaluate the benefit of using PFA in unsuccessful RF ablation linear lesions. Methods We studied 17 patients that underwent redo procedures due to atrial arrhythmia recurrence. All of them underwent PFA (using a pentaspline PFA catheter) ablation lines due to previous unsuccessful RF ablation, either due to remnant conduction in the line or to reconnection of the line. Lines of block were evaluated based on activation mapping and differential pacing maneuvers close to the lines. Results We conducted 16 dome-posterior lines and 6 posterolateral mitral isthmus lines using PFA after unsuccessful RF ablation linear lesions. PFA was performed after several unsuccessful procedure, 1.3±0.4 for the roof line, 1.3±0.5 for the postero-inferior line and 1.7±0.9 for the MI line. In 4 out of 6 pts with MI isthmus ablation using PFA ethanol injection within vein of Marshall (Et-VOM) was conducted in a previous procedure and in 4 out of 6 patients with MI isthmus RF ablation within coronary sinus (CS) was performed in a previous procedure. Specifically, for the dome-posterior line, 2 patients underwent PFA deliveries only at the gap region in the posterior LA and in other 14 cases, PFA deliveries were performed at 3.2±0.8 sites of the posterior wall between LPV and RPV. We used a total of 15.5±4.6 PFA deliveries to complete the dome-posterior line. Dome-posterior line bidirectional block based on activation mapping and differential pacing maneuvers was achieved in all cases (16/16, 100%) after PFA. For the MI line, we performed a total of 11.8±2.3 application deliveries at 2.5±0.5 sites in the MI region. Posterior MI line bidirectional block based on activation mapping and differential pacing maneuvers was achieved in 5 out of 6 patients (83.3%). In one case additional Et-VOM was needed to achieve MI block. There was no AT/AF recurrence in all these 17 patients. Conclusion PFA treatment seems promising to back-up RF failed linear lesions. But we cannot exclude that it is in fact the combination of the 2 energies that was successful in those resistant cases.
Read full abstract