Objective: To investigate the corneal topographic characteristics of the parents of patients with keratoconus (KC) and the correlation with their offspring. Methods: Case-control study. Twenty-six patients (49 eyes) with KC, who were 15 males and 11 females, and (18.83±2.74) years old, 48 parents (96 eyes) of patients with KC, who were 23 males and 25 females, and (44.14±1.70) years old, and 44 controls (88 eyes), who were 22 males and 22 females, and (42.81±4.03) years old, were enrolled in Qingdao Eye Hospital. The indexes in the Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia Display were acquired with Pentacam topography. The basic indicators were flat K/steep K/maximum K (Kmax) curvature and astigmatism, thinnest pachymetry (TP), and front/back elevation (Ef/Eb); the Belin indexes included deviation of normality of the front/back elevation (Df/Db), deviation of average pachymetry progression/normality of corneal thinnest point/normality of relational thickness (Dp/Dt/Da), overall deviation of normality (Do), minimum/maximum/average pachymetric progression indices (PPImin/PPImax/PPIave), and Ambrósio's average and maximum relational thickness indices (ARTave/ARTmax). All parameters in the groups of parents and controls were compared by Mann-Whitney U test. The ROC curve was used to analyze the differential value of each abnormal index. In addition, the ratio of abnormal indicators in the Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia Display was statistically analyzed. Partial correlation analysis was used to find the correlation between the parameters of KC patients and their parents, and binary logistics regression analysis was used to predict the prevalence in children through the parental indicators. Results: Clinical KC was diagnosed in 1 of the 48 parents (2.08%) of patients with KC. There was no statistically significant difference in anterior surface parameters such as K1, K2, Kmax, astigmatism and Ef, but differences in the thickness [522.00 (493.00, 542.75) μm versus 540.00 (523.25, 559.50) μm] and posterior surface elevation value [8.00 (4.00, 11.00) μm versus 5.00 (3.00, 8.00) μm] were statistically significant. Except for Df, the other Belin/Ambrósio indicators such as Do (Z=-4.551, P=0.000), PPImax (Z=-3.959, P=0.000) and ARTave (Z=-4.792, P=0.000) indicated significant difference. The ROC curve analyses showed ARTave had the greatest value in the identification of KC patients (AUC=0.705), PPImax had the best sensitivity (0.845), and Eb had the best specificity (0.837). The ratio of suspicious indicators between the parents' group and the control group was 1.5∶1, and the ratio of pathological indicators was 3∶1. There was a correlation in multiple parameters between KC patients and their parents (all P>0.05). Do/Eb/TP indices of mothers and Do/Kmax indices of fathers were the major influence factors for the disease in the offspring, with a diagnosis rate of 85.6%. Conclusions: The corneal topographic map of the parents of patients with KC showed that the index of the anterior surface was normal, but the thickness was thinner and the posterior surface was higher. According to Belin's analysis, all indicators except Df were abnormal. Moreover, the ratio of suspected and pathological indicators increased. These data suggested that the corneal topography of parents of patients with KC had features of subclinical KC. Compared with the traditional index, ARTave was of the highest value in the identification of subclinical KC. There was a strong correlation between parents of patients with KC and offspring. The Do and Kmax indices of paternal parents and the Do, Eb and TP indices of maternal parents were good predictors of children's disease. (Chin J Ophthalmol, 2020, 56:456-464).
Read full abstract