Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Research Articles

Cervical discectomy: A prospective analysis of three operative techniques

BACKGROUND Cervical disc herniation causing neurological compromise is a common affliction. Sophisticated surgical treatments have been developed throughout the twentieth century and are largely successful. Although each procedure has its supporters, it is still unclear if one surgical technique is superior. METHODS A prospective trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of three surgical procedures for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy caused by a unilateral acute herniated cervical disc. Patients were randomized to posterior cervical foraminotomy (FOR), and anterior cervical discectomy with (ACDF), and without (ACD) fusion. Perioperative data, office follow-up and long-term follow-up were used to compare the procedures. RESULTS All of the procedures yielded excellent relief of symptoms and signs postoperatively and during follow-up. Operative time and hospital stay were slightly shorter for ACD compared with ACDF and FOR. Reoperations occurred in all groups but there was a trend for higher recurrence at the same level with FOR and recurrence at other levels with ACDF. CONCLUSION All three of the procedures were successful for treatment of cervical radiculopathy caused by a herniated cervical disc. Although the numbers in this study were small, none of the procedures could be considered superior to the others. This study suggests that the selection of surgical procedure may reasonably be based on the preference of the surgeon and tailored to the individual patient.

Results of posterior cervical foraminotomy for treatment of cervical spondylitic radiculopathy

We evaluated the results of posterior cervical foraminotomy for spondylitic radiculopathy using a questionnaire sent to all 77 patients who had undergone surgery between 1990 and 1995 at our institution. Sixty-two patients (40 male) returned their questionnaires, one of whom had undergone two procedures (dealt with as separate events). Sixty patients complained of pre-operative arm pain; of these 42 (70%) had complete or >75% resolution of their pain, 14 (23%) had <75% improvement in their pain and four (7%) had the same or worsened pain at the time of the questionnaire. Sixteen patients (27%) reported initial improvement in symptoms with subsequent deterioration. The mean patient satisfaction score using a linear analogue scale from 0 to 10 was 7.5. Main postoperative complaints were neck pain (22%), persisting motor deficit (6%) and persisting sensory deficit (9%). One patient suffered nerve root damage at surgery. For unilateral and, in some cases, multi-level degenerative disease causing cervical radiculopathy, posterior cervical foraminotomy is a useful technique with the advantage of avoiding fusion, immobilization and the long-term risk of instability.

Endoscopic foraminotomy using MED system in cadaveric specimens.

Four cadavers had cervical foraminotomies performed at noncontiguous levels using either the standard open technique or the microendoscopic technique. To evaluate the feasibility of using a minimally invasive technique for posterior decompression of cervical disc disease. Even though the anterior approach is more commonly performed for the treatment of cervical disc disease, the posterior approach has distinct advantages in selected cases of foraminal stenosis and posterolateral disc herniation. Current technique, however, requires extensive muscle dissection, and is, therefore, subject to significant morbidity. Each of four cadavers had posterior cervical foraminotomies performed using either the MICROENDOSCOPIC (MED) technique, or the standard open technique. Three noncontiguous levels were decompressed using one technique, and the other technique was used for the adjacent contralateral decompression. Each specimen was then evaluated with postoperative myelogram/CT and open dissection. Laminotomy size, length of root decompressed, and percentage of facet removed were measured. Average vertical diameter decompression and percentage of facet removed were significantly greater for the MED technique than for the open technique. Transverse diameter of the laminotomy area and the average length of decompressed root were not significantly different between the techniques. Posterior cervical foraminotomy, using the microendoscopic technique, is technically feasible and may be applicable to the treatment of foraminal stenosis and laterally located cervical disc herniation. Studies in live animals are currently examining techniques for hemostasis.

Cervical foraminotomy: an effective treatment for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy

Between 1983 and 1994, posterior cervical foraminotomy as described by Frykholm was performed on 89 patients with exclusively radicular symptoms caused by cervical osteophytes. The main presenting feature was arm pain. Objective neurological signs were present in 50% of the patients. At mean postoperative follow-up of 8.6 months, 95.5% of patients reported excellent or good results, while 4.5% were not improved. No patient was rendered worse following the procedure. There were no deaths and the complication rate was 2.2%. Further surgery for recurrent root symptoms was required by 6.7% of patients. Our findings are in keeping with the good results and low complication rate of this procedure as described in other studies. Informal inquiries suggest that this procedure is not widely used, at any rate in the United Kingdom, and we present this series in order to emphasize the efficacy and safety of this procedure.