Post-transplant Dyslipidemia Research Articles

Dyslipidemia in Renal Transplant Recipients

Dyslipidemia is a frequent complication after kidney transplantation (KT) and is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Renal transplant recipients (RTRs) are considered at high, or very high, risk of CVD, which is a leading cause of death in this patient group. Despite many factors of post-transplant dyslipidemia, the immunosuppressive treatment has the biggest influence on a lipid profile. There are no strict dyslipidemia treatment guidelines for RTRs, but the ones proposing an individual approach regarding CVD risk seem most suitable. Proper diet and physical activity are the main general measures to manage dyslipidemia and should be introduced initially in every patient after KT. In the case of an insufficient correction of lipemia, statins are the basis for hypolipidemic treatment. Statins should be introduced with caution to avoid serious side-effects (e.g., myopathy) or drug-drug interactions, especially with immunosuppressants. To lower the incidence of adverse effects, and improve medication adherence, ezetimibe in combination with statins is recommended. Fibrates and bile sequestrants are not recommended due to their side-effects and variable efficacy. However, several new lipid-lowering drugs like Proprotein convertase subtilisin/Kexin type9 (PCSK9) inhibitors may have promising effects in RTRs, but further research assessing efficacy and safety is yet to be carried out.

Prognostic implication of early posttransplant hypercholesterolemia in liver transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

BackgroundHyperlipidemia is a common complication after liver transplantation (LT) and develops mostly in the early posttransplant period. Recently, some studies have reported a positive correlation between hyperlipidemia and favorable prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing hepatectomy. This study aimed to evaluate the possibility of predicting prognosis in HCC patients receiving LT by early posttransplant dyslipidemia. MethodsFrom January 2015 to December 2017, a total of 806 HCC patients from China Liver Transplant Registry database were retrospectively enrolled. The prognostic relevance of early posttransplant hypertriglyceridemia or hypercholesterolemia was examined using survival analysis, and subgroup analysis was implemented based on LT criteria. ResultsEarly posttransplant hypercholesterolemia (EPHC) was independently inversely associated with the risk of recurrence [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.630; P = 0.022], but was not significantly correlated with the mortality. However, early posttransplant hypertriglyceridemia was not related to prognosis. Intriguingly, with further classification, we found that borderline EPHC (B-EPHC), instead of significant EPHC, was a predictor of lower risk for both recurrence (HR = 0.504; P = 0.006) and mortality (HR = 0.511; P = 0.023). Compared with non-EPHC patients, B-EPHC patients achieved significantly superior 1-year and 3-year tumor-free survival (89.6% and 83.7% vs. 83.8% and 72.7% respectively; P = 0.023), and 1-year and 3-year overall survival (95.8% and 84.8% vs. 94.6% and 77.6% respectively; P = 0.039). In the subgroup analysis, B-EPHC remained an independent predictor of better prognosis in patients beyond Milan criteria and those within Hangzhou criteria; whereas there was no significant relationship between B-EPHC and prognosis in patients within Milan criteria and those beyond Hangzhou criteria. More interestingly, patients beyond Milan criteria but within Hangzhou criteria were identified as the crucial subpopulation who benefited from B-EPHC (recurrence HR = 0.306, P = 0.011; mortality HR = 0.325, P = 0.031). ConclusionsB-EPHC could assist transplant teams in dynamically evaluating prognosis after LT for HCC as a postoperative non-oncological biomarker, especially in patients beyond Milan criteria but within Hangzhou criteria.

Non-HDL cholesterol is an independent predictor of long-term cardiovascular events in patients with dyslipidemia after renal transplantation.

Posttransplant dyslipidemia is a common condition in renal transplantation recipients (RTR) and is related to poor cardiac outcomes. We aimed to demonstrate the value of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) in predicting long-term major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in RTR with dyslipidemia. Patients who had undergone renal transplantation between 2011 and 2019 were retrospectively analysed and were classified as normal non-HDL-C and high non-HDL-C groups based on first year levels. Development of high non-HDL-C levels was used to predict the occurrence of MACCE (a combination of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, and nonfatal stroke) and all-cause death during the long-term follow-up. Overall, 674 patients were included, of whom 470 (69.7%) were male; the mean age was 43.6±13.2years. The mean follow-up duration was 5.5±2.29years 1year after the transplant. MACCE occurred during the follow-up in 102 (61.8%) patients in the high non-HDL-C group and 13 (2.6%) patients in the normal non-HDL-C group (P<.001). High non-HDL-C was a predictor of MACCE in the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.02, P<.001). Smoking (HR: 1.92, 95% CI 1.16-3.20, P<.001), cadaver graft (HR: 2.55, 95% CI 1.52-4.26, P<.001), and left ventricular ejection fraction (HR: 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.98, P<.001) were also predictors of MACCE. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that all MACCE components and all-cause mortality were significantly higher in the high non-HDL-C group (P<.001). Non-HDL-C was closely related to long-term cardiac outcomes in RTR with dyslipidemia. Non-HDL-C should be among the primary goals in lipid-lowering treatment in post-transplant dyslipidemia.

Post-transplant dyslipidemia in two cases

Post-transplant dyslipidemia in two cases

Post-transplant dyslipidemia in two cases

Post-transplant dyslipidemia in two cases

Post-transplant dyslipidemia in two cases

Post-transplant dyslipidemia in two cases

Determinants of trajectories of cardiac allograft vasculopathy after heart transplantation: a population based study

Abstract Background Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a major contributor of heart transplant recipient's mortality. Little is known about determinants of CAV trajectories at a population level. Purpose We aimed to identify the respective contribution of immune and non-immune factors in the different evolutive profiles of CAV. Methods Heart transplant recipients receiving care at 2 academic centers (2004 to 2016) were included. Patients underwent prospective, protocol-based monitoring consisting of repeated coronary angiographies together with systematic assessment of clinical, functional, histological and immunological parameters. The outcome was CAV trajectories, identified with unsupervised latent class mixed models. The independent, predictive factors of CAV trajectories were investigated with multinomial regressions (NCT04117152). Results Overall, 815 patients were included. The median follow-up post-transplant was 7.7 years (IQR=5.14) with 2,742 coronary angiographies analyzed. We identified 4 distinct profiles of CAV trajectories over 10 years that were characterized by i) Patients without CAV at baseline and non-progression (n=459, 56.3%), ii) patients without CAV at baseline and late onset CAV progression (n=62, 7.6%), iii) patients with mild baseline CAV and mild progression (n=188 23.1%), iv) patients with mild baseline CAV and accelerated CAV progression (n=106, 13.0%, discrimination 0.92). Six early independent predictors of CAV trajectories were identified: donor age (p&amp;lt;0.001), donor male gender (p&amp;lt;0.001), donor tobacco consumption (p=0.001), recipient post-transplant dyslipidemia (p=0.009), preexisting or de novo class II anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (p=0.004) and episode of acute cellular rejection ≥2R during the first year post transplantation (p=0.028). Conclusion In a large multicentric and highly phenotyped prospective cohort of heart transplant recipients, we identified 4 robust CAV trajectories and their respective immune and non-immune determinants. Our results provide the basis for a trajectory-based assessment of heart transplant patients for early patient risk stratification and patient monitoring. Factors associated CAV trajectories in multivariate analyses in the derivation cohort. This table shows the association of clinical, immunological, functional and structural parameters associated with CAV trajectories in multivariate multinomial regression analysis. The trajectory of reference was trajectory #1, including patients with no CAV at baseline and stable CAV grade over time. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Randomized trial of steroid free immunosuppression with basiliximab induction in adult live donor liver transplantation (LDLT)

BackgroundCorticosteroids are an integral part of immunosuppression following solid organ transplantation, despite their metabolic complications. We conducted a randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy of steroid-free immunosuppression following live donor liver transplantation (LDLT). MethodsWe randomized 104 patients stratified based on pre-transplant diabetic status to either a steroid-free arm (SF-arm) (Basiliximab + Tacrolimus and Azathioprine,n = 52) or Steroid arm (S-Arm) (Steroid + Tacrolimus + Azathioprine,n = 52). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of metabolic complications (new-onset diabetes after transplant (NODAT), new-onset systemic hypertension after transplant (NOSHT), post-transplant dyslipidemia) within 6 months after transplant. Secondary endpoints included biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) within six months, patient and graft survival at 6 months. ResultsThe incidence NODAT was significantly higher in S-arm at 3 months (64.5%vs. 28.1%,p-0.004) and 6 months (51.6% vs. 15.6%,p-0.006). Likewise, the incidence of NOSHT (27.8% vs. 4.8%,p-0.01) and hypertriglyceridemia (26.7% vs. 8%,p-0.03) at six months was significantly higher in S-arm. However, there were no differences in BPAR (19.2% vs. 21.2%, p-0.81), time to first rejection (58 vs. 53 days, p-0.78), patient and graft survival (610 vs. 554 days,p- 0.22). ConclusionFollowing LDLT, basiliximab induction with tacrolimus and azathioprine maintenance resulted in significantly lower metabolic complications compared to the triple-drug regimen of steroid, tacrolimus, and azathioprine.

Increased macrophage activation marker soluble CD163 is associated with graft dysfunction and metabolic derangements in renal transplant recipients

BackgroundRenal allograft is vulnerable to numerous insults and is associated with metabolic derangements. Macrophages are regulators of inflammation and play a role in obesity, lipid metabolism and insulin resistance (IR). The present study was designed to assess macrophage activation, reflected by serum soluble CD163 (sCD163), in renal transplant recipients (RTR) and its relation to chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD) and metabolic derangements. MethodsFifty recipients of renal transplantation (RT) [22 with stable renal function and 28 with CAD] and 20 age- and sex-matched healthy controls were enrolled in the study. Serum sCD163 and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Anthropometric measurements, renal function, lipid profile and homeostatic model assessment of IR (HOMA-IR) were estimated. Renal interstitial fibrosis (IF) was graded in renal biopsies of CAD. ResultsRTR mean age was 38.84 ± 9.28 years and 83% of them were males. Post-transplant dyslipidemia, diabetes and IR (HOMA-IR >2) were present in 42%, 24% and 86% of RTR respectively. Serum sCD163 levels were significantly higher in RTR with stable renal function and CAD than in healthy controls (814.41 ± 59.62 ng/ml and 1021.21 ± 120.82 ng/ml vs. 602.90 ± 114.98 ng/ml respectively) and in RTR with CAD than in patients with stable renal function (p < 0.001). Serum sCD163 levels were positively correlated with body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, worsening renal function, dyslipidemia, HOMA-IR and serum hsCRP in RTR and with the degree of renal IF in RTR with CAD (p < 0.05). ROC curve showed that serum sCD163 was superior to serum hsCRP in detecting CAD after RT (AUC = 0.972 vs. 0.753 respectively, p = 0.001). ConclusionMacrophage activation, reflected by increased circulating sCD163, may play a role in the development of CAD and metabolic derangements after RT. Serum sCD163 could be a potential biomarker for renal allograft dysfunction.

Management of dyslipidemia in pediatric renal transplant recipients.

Dyslipidemia after kidney transplantation is a common complication that has historically been underappreciated, especially in pediatric recipients. It is also a major modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease, a top cause of morbidity and mortality of transplant patients. While most knowledge about post-transplant dyslipidemia has been generated in adults, recommendations and treatment strategies also exist for children and are presented in this review. Awareness of these applicable guidelines and approaches is required, but not sufficient, for the reliable management of dyslipidemia in our patients, and additional needs and opportunities for comprehensive care in this area (e.g., quality improvement) are outlined.

Dyslipidemia in patients with chronic kidney disease: etiology and management.

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), including those with end-stage renal disease, treated with dialysis, or renal transplant recipients have an increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality. Dyslipidemia, often present in this patient population, is an important risk factor for CVD development. Specific quantitative and qualitative changes are seen at different stages of renal impairment and are associated with the degree of glomerular filtration rate declining. Patients with non-dialysis-dependent CKD have low high-density lipoproteins (HDL), normal or low total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, increased triglycerides as well as increased apolipoprotein B (apoB), lipoprotein(a) (Lp (a)), intermediate- and very-low-density lipoprotein (IDL, VLDL; “remnant particles”), and small dense LDL particles. In patients with nephrotic syndrome lipid profile is more atherogenic with increased TC, LDL, and triglycerides. Lipid profile in hemodialysis (HD) patients is usually similar to that in non-dialysis-dependent CKD patients. Patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) have more altered dyslipidemia compared to HD patients, which is more atherogenic in nature. These differences may be attributed to PD per se but may also be associated with the selection of dialytic modality. In renal transplant recipients, TC, LDL, VLDL, and triglycerides are elevated, whereas HDL is significantly reduced. Many factors can influence post-transplant dyslipidemia including immunosuppressive agents. This patient population is obviously at high risk; hence, prompt diagnosis and management are required to improve their clinical outcomes. Various studies have shown statins to be effective in the cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with mild-to-moderate CKD as well as in renal transplant recipients. However, according to recent clinical randomized controlled trials (4D, A Study to Evaluate the Use of Rosuvastatin in Subjects on Regular Dialysis: an Assessment of Survival and Cardiovascular Events, and Study of Heart and Renal protection), these beneficial effects are uncertain in dialyzed patients. Therefore, further research for the most suitable treatment options is needed.

Post-transplant dyslipidemia: Mechanisms, diagnosis and management.

Post-transplant dyslipidemia is highly prevalent and presents unique management challenges to the clinician. The two major outcomes to consider with post-transplant therapies for dyslipidemia are preserving or improving allograft function, and reducing cardiovascular risk. Although there are other cardiovascular risk factors such as graft dysfunction, hypertension, and diabetes, attention to dyslipidemia is warranted because interventions for dyslipidemia have an impact on reducing cardiac events in clinical trials specific to the transplant population. Dyslipidemia is not synonymous with hyperlipidemia. Numerous mechanisms exist for the occurrence of post-transplant dyslipidemia, including those mediated by immunosuppressive drug therapy. Statin therapy has received the most attention in all solid organ transplant recipient populations, although the effect of proper dietary advice and adjuvant pharmacological and non-pharmacological agents should not be dismissed. At all stages of treatment appropriate monitoring strategies for side effects should be implemented so that the benefits from these therapies can be achieved. Clinicians have a choice when there is a conflict between various transplant society and lipid society guidelines for therapy and targets.

Prevalence and risk factors of obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia and diabetes mellitus before and after adult living donor liver transplantation.

The development of metabolic abnormalities after liver transplantation (LTx) contributes to cardiovascular events and mortality. We analyzed the prevalence and risk factors of obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia and diabetes mellitus (DM) after adult living donor liver transplantation. Fifty-four adult recipients with a minimum follow up of 6 months receiving living donor liver transplantation between 2001 and 2012 at the Tohoku University Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The prevalence of hypertension increased from 18.5% before transplantation to 35.2% post-transplantation, and new-onset hypertension after transplantation was 57.9% of post-transplant hypertension. Univariate analysis showed that risk factors of post-transplant hypertension were age (>50 years, P = 0.0023), pretransplant body mass index (BMI) of 25 or more (P = 0.0123), pretransplant hypertension (P = 0.0012) and cyclosporin A (61.5% vs tacrolimus 25.0%, P = 0.0248). The incidence of obesity, dyslipidemia and DM did not change from before to after transplantation. LTx was curative in 77.8% of cases of pretransplant dyslipidemia and 20% of cases of pretransplant DM. Primary biliary cirrhosis cases comprised 85.7% of cases of pretransplant dyslipidemia that were cured by LTx. In univariate analysis, pretransplant BMI of 25 or more was the only risk factor of post-transplant dyslipidemia (P = 0.0098). The incidence of new-onset DM after transplantation was 20%. Risk factors of post-transplant DM were male sex (P = 0.0156), pretransplant DM (P < 0.0001), alcohol abuse (P = 0.0248) and mycophenolate mofetil (P = 0.0181) by univariate analysis. The prevalence of hypertension increased after LTx and pretransplant obesity was associated with several post-transplant metabolic abnormalities.

MTOR inhibitors and dyslipidemia in transplant recipients: a cause for concern?

Post-transplant dyslipidemia is exacerbated by mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors. Early clinical trials of mTOR inhibitors used fixed dosing with no concomitant reduction in calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) exposure, leading to concerns when consistent and marked dyslipidemia was observed. With use of modern concentration-controlled mTOR inhibitor regimens within CNI-free or reduced-exposure CNI regimens, however, the dyslipidemic effect persists but is less pronounced. Typically, total cholesterol levels are at the upper end of normal, or indicate borderline risk, in kidney and liver transplant recipients, and are lower in heart transplant patients under near-universal statin therapy. Of note, it is possible that mTOR inhibitors may offer a cardioprotective effect. Experimental evidence for delayed progression of atherosclerosis is consistent with evidence from heart transplantation that coronary artery intimal thickening and the incidence of cardiac allograft vasculopathy are reduced with everolimus versus cyclosporine therapy. Preliminary data also indicate that mTOR inhibitors may improve arterial stiffness, a predictor of cardiovascular events, and may reduce ventricular remodeling and decrease left ventricular mass through an anti-fibrotic effect. Post-transplant dyslipidemia under mTOR inhibitor therapy should be monitored and managed closely, but unless unresponsive to therapy should not be regarded as a barrier to its use.

Effect of Low Doses of Atorvastatin on the Urinary Peptide Profile of Kidney Transplant Patients

Statins are prescribed to reduce posttransplant dyslipidemia, which is frequent among kidney graft recipients. Their efficacy to reduce cholesterol levels has been accompanied by pleiotropic effects. Proteomics is the study of the expressed complement of proteins in tissues or biological fluids. It includes the identification of changes in proteins that occur in various states, eg, after drug administration. Our study objectives were: (1) to analyze the effect of atorvastatin (10 mg/d) on lipid profile, renal function, proteinuria, and inflammation parameters, such as C-reactive protein (CRP), and (2) to use proteomics to ascertain whether this treatment modified the patients' urinary peptide profiles seeking to understand the molecular actions of the drug. Urinary peptide profiles, lipids, renal function parameters (creatinine clearance), proteinuria, and CRP were determined in 39 patients at baseline and at 12 weeks after atorvastatin treatment (10 mg/d). The peptide fraction of each sample acquired using magnetic beads was analyzed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). Our results showed that treatment with atorvastatin produced a significant reduction in lipid profile, but did not modify renal function (creatinine clearance), proteinuria, or CRP. The proteomic study showed that statin treatment did not produce significant changes in the urinary peptidome, although there was a tendency for some peptides to increase or decrease after the treatment.

Relation of C-2 Monitoring With Serum Lipid Profile in Stable Renal Transplant Patients

C-2 monitoring has been proposed as a more effective strategy than C-0 to predict the risk of acute rejection in the early stages posttransplantation. However, cyclosporine (CsA) is associated with posttransplant dyslipidemia. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the correlations of C-0 and C-2 levels with atherogenic risk factors in the first 6 months versus after 6 months posttransplantation. We evaluated the data from 127 stable renal transplant recipients (89 males, 38 females) of mean age 38.10 ± 12.79 years who received Neoral-based immunosuppression to investigate the relation of C-2 levels to serum lipid profile compared with C-0 values in the early and late posttransplantation periods. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to define a C-2 cutoff level that identified subjects with hypercholesterolemia, defined as a total cholesterol (TC) >200 mg/dL. There were significant positive correlations between both C-0 and C-2 levels and TC as well as the ratio of total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol (TC/HDL) in the late period. When the C-2 levels in the late posttransplantation period were stratified, serum TC concentrations showed statistically significant differences between the groups. Whole blood C-2 levels above 850 ng/mL were associated with increased serum TC concentrations; the C-2 cutoff level leading to hypercholesterolemia was 888 ng/mL. Maintenance immunosuppressive therapy under the proposed whole blood C-2 level of 888 ng/mL seemed to preserve graft function while preventing atherogenic risks for cardiovascular diseases in the late posttransplantation period.

Genetic factors play an important role in the pathogenesis of hyperlipidemia post-transplantation

Background: Our purpose was to identify factors associated with hyperlipidemia post-transplantation in a Hispanic population. Methods: From 1985 to 1999, a kidney graft survival longer than 3 months occurred in 293 cases at the Instituto Nacional de la Nutrición. Most of the patients living in Mexico City were included (n = 83). The evaluation included a questionnaire, blood samples, and assessment of body composition and dietary habits. As many as possible first-degree relatives were studied. Results: Women had higher values of cholesterol (236 ± 51 versus 215 ±41; P < 0.05), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (147 ± 42 versus 131 ± 34; P = 0.05), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (57.3 ± 14 versus 47.9 ± 14; P = 0.002) and high-density lipoprotein-2 cholesterol. Isolated hypercholesterolemia was the most common lipid abnormality (40.9%), followed by mixed hyperlipidemia. Lipoprotein (a) greater than 30 mg/dL was found in 13 cases. Familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCHL) in the patient's relatives was a marker for dyslipidemia (odds ratio, 7.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 59.7). These cases had a worse lipid profile. Cyclosporine-treated FCHL patients had higher lipid levels compared with the non-FCHL, cyclosporine-treated patients. The effects of cyclosporine on the lipid levels were lower, but significant, after the exclusion of the FCHL cases. Conclusion: Post-transplant dyslipidemia is determined by genetic and environmental factors. FCHL in the patient's relatives was associated with post-transplant hyperlipidemia; an additive effect with cyclosporine was found. The evaluation of the lipid profile of relatives may be useful for the assessment of the risk of post-transplant dyslipidemia. © 2002 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.

Dyslipidemia and dietary modification in Chilean renal pediatric transplantation

RENAL transplantation has significantly improved patient prognosis in chronic renal failure. However, increasing attention is drawn to the high incidence of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in renal transplant recipients. Persistent hypercholesterolemia of adults posttransplant is a risk factor for accelerated atherosclerosis and a 10% incidence of ischemic heart disease at 3-year follow up was observed. In both the European transplant and in the USRDS registry, cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of death posttransplantation. The reason may be the accumulation of risk factors such as hypertension and dyslipidemia. Hypetriglyceridemia and hypercholesterolemia posttransplant have been described widely in the adult literature and sporadically in pediatric transplant studies. Since the initiation of NAPRTCS, several changes in the practice patterns for donors have been observed. These changes have improved 1-year graft survival of transplant, so that most recent data show cadaveric donor graft survival in 1996 to be as good as living donor graft survival was in 1987. The survival for recipients of living donor organs has increased from 88% in 1987 to 93% in 1996. The estimated half-life of the allograft is approximately 10 years; therefore, it is necessary to prevent lipid alterations at an early age in renal pediatric transplant recipients to ensure a reasonable chance of long-term survival in adult life through dietetic therapy or hypolipemic agents. Contributing factors to posttransplant dyslipidemia include renal dysfunction, proteinuria, pretransplant dialysis, immunosuppressive therapy with corticosteroids, cyclosporine, beta-adrenergic antagonist, or combinations of these factors. The impact of dyslipidemia on long-term graft and patient survival in renal transplant recipients is generally accepted. The influence of immunosuppressive drugs is clearly implicated in maintaining hypetriglyceridemia and in the development of hypercholesterolemia posttransplant. Dietary intervention remains as a cornerstone in the prevention and treatment of the hyperlipidemia. The American Heart Association (AHA) and National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) have provided guidelines for the treatment of hyperlipidemic patients, including the Step II Diet. When this approach fails, pharmacologic therapy should be considered. In adult patients, diet caused modest reductions in total cholesterol and LDL-C; HMGCoA reductase inhibitors caused the greatest and most consistent reductions in cholesterol and LDL-C. The purpose of this study was to characterize the Chilean renal transplant population in respect to lipid profile. We tested whether an easily reproducible diet such as the AHA Step II Diet would be effective in lowering cholesterol levels in hyperlipidemic renal transplant recipients.

Combined Treatment with Low-Dose Pravastatin and Fish Oil in Post-Renal Transplantation Dislipidemia

Background: The most common cause of post-transplant dyslipidemia is the use of corticosteroids and cyclosporin-A (CyA). The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors have emerged as the agents of first choice in the treatment of post-transplant hyperlipidemia in combination with low fat diet. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of combined treatment with low-dose pravastatin and fish oil in post-renal transplantation dislipidemia. Patients and Methods: Twenty-four renal transplant patients, 15 men and 9 women aged from 30 to 60 years with stable renal function were included in this study. All patients were transplanted from living related donors and were given a stable triple immunosuppressive therapy, with methylprednisolone, azathioprine and CyA. All patients were also given a standard diet containing 1 g/kg BW protein, reducing the daily fat to less than 30%, and maintaining at least a 1:1 ratio of saturated to polyunsaturated (or monounsaturated) fats. A dosage of 20 mg pravastatin (pravachol) and 1 g of fish oil (prolipid) were added to the diet after dinner, according to our protocol. Blood samples were taken after each study period for total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, Apo A₁, Apo B, Lp(a), creatinine, CPK and fibrinogen determination. Results: At the end of the therapeutic protocol with pravastatin a significant reduction (p < 0.02) of total and LDL-cholesterol was observed, but no significant change in triglycerides, HDL, Lp(a), Apo A₁, Apo B and fibrinogen was shown. At the end of the therapeutic protocol with pravastatin and fish oil supplement significant changes were seen in TC (p < 0.02), TG (p < 0.03), LDL-C (p < 0.03), Apo A₁ (p < 0.04) and Apo B (p < 0.05) concentrations. There were no significant changes in HDL-C and Lp(a) concentrations. Renal function and cyclosporine levels were not changed during and after the study. CPK was increased only in one case. Conclusions: It is suggested that if the response to the diet is inadequate, the use of combined treatment with low-dose pravastatin and fish oil is a more effective strategy than the pravastatin treatment alone for changing the lipid profile after renal transplantation.