Introduction: Despite the rapid advances of diabetes technologies, postprandial glucose management remains a challenge for people living with type 1 diabetes (pwT1D). We aim to assess the efficacy of single-hormone (SH) compared to dual-hormone (DH) automated insulin delivery (AID) systems in postprandial glucose management. Methods: Post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled crossover inpatient trial including three standardized meals (taken at 8am, 12 pm, and 5pm) during a 24-hour period, comparing SH-AID and DH-AID among pwT1D. Data from meals of each participant was pooled. Primary outcome was time in range % (TIR%, 70 to 180 mg/dL), calculated by continuous glucose monitoring during the 4-hour postprandial period. Paired t-test was used to compare the two groups. Results: Eighteen adult participants were included (mean age [SD] 43 [14] years, mean duration of T1D 20 [11] years, mean HbA1c 7.6% [1.0], mean daily insulin intake 26.70 [11.04] units). Postprandial TIR% was similar between SH and DH-AID (66.4% vs 70.2%, p=0.443). Less time in postprandial hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL) was observed in the DH-AID group compared to SH-AID (5.4% vs 11.9%, p=0.019). No difference was observed in postprandial time spent in hyperglycemia (>180 mg/dL), glycemic variability indices or insulin intake between the two groups. Conclusion: Compared with SH-AID, DH-AID reduces postprandial hypoglycemia, while other postprandial glucose metrics remain similar among adult pwT1D. Disclosure M. Lebbar: None. J. Molveau: None. V. Boudreau: None. R. Rabasa-lhoret: Consultant; Dexcom, Inc., Abbott, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novo Nordisk Canada Inc., Sanofi, Lilly, Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc., Insulet Corporation. Z. Wu: Other Relationship; Eli Lilly and Company.
Read full abstract