Postoperative Femoral Fractures Research Articles

Clinical experience of the use of reamer irrigator aspirator in Japanese patients: A report of the first 42 cases

BackgroundA reamer irrigator aspirator (RIA) can be used to harvest substantial amounts of autologous bone and debride the intramedullary canal. Clinical experience using reamer irrigator aspirators in Japan is very limited. The applicability of the reamer irrigator aspirator head with a minimum diameter of 12 mm for Japanese people is often questioned as the Japanese are smaller than Americans and Europeans. There are no reports of complications in Japanese patients. This study aimed to retrospectively review clinical cases and describe reamer irrigator aspirator use in Japanese patients. MethodsAll patients for whom a reamer irrigator aspirator was used during surgery at our hospital between January 2014 and September 2018 were included. The patients’ clinical and radiographic data were retrospectively reviewed. ResultsData of 40 patients (42 cases) were collected. The reamer irrigator aspirator was used for bone graft harvesting in 32 cases, intramedullary debridement and irrigation in 9 cases, and reaming for exchange nailing in 1 case. The diameter of the reamer irrigator aspirator reamer head was 12 mm in 22 cases (53.7%), 12.5 mm in 4 cases (9.8%), 13 mm in 9 cases (22.0%), 13.5 mm in 1 case (2.4%), 14.0 mm in 1 case (2.4%), 14.5 mm in 1 case (2.4%), and 15 mm in 4 cases (9.8%). Mean intraoperative bleeding volume was 1158.6 mL (range, 100–3800 mL). We experienced no difficulty inserting the reamer irrigator aspirator into the intramedullary canals and no cases of insertion-related intraoperative fracture. Five cortical perforations (11.9%) were observed on postoperative computed tomography scans, although no patient was symptomatic. One case (2.4%) of postoperative femur fracture occurred. ConclusionsReamer irrigator aspirators can be used in Japanese patients. Smaller reamer head sizes were mainly used in our experience. We should manage complications as in previous reports from Western countries.

Predictors of Perioperative Vancouver B Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Associated With the Direct Anterior Approach to Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundThere is an association between intraoperative and postoperative femoral fractures and the direct anterior approach (DAA) to total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of our study is to identify risk factors for Vancouver B fractures and to establish a predictable timeline for when these occur. MethodsWe retrospectively identified patients with Vancouver B periprosthetic femoral fractures (n = 49) after 11,509 elective primary cementless THA procedures through the DAA between 2012 and 2018 at a single institution. Fracture patients were matched to nonfracture patients (n = 267) by date of surgery and surgeon. Clinical and radiographic factors were collected for multivariable analysis to identify predictors of fracture. ResultsPeriprosthetic Vancouver B femoral fracture incidence was 0.4%. 48 (98%) fractures were postoperative. Fractures occurred at an average of 44 days after surgery (range: 1 to 653 days) with >85% of fractures occurring in the first 6 weeks postoperatively. Significant variables predictive of fracture included >3 degrees valgus and >5 degrees varus coronal stem malalignment, Dorr B and C femoral geometry, lower canal flare index (2.75 vs 3.20), advanced age, increased comorbidities, greater stem canal fill, and right-sided procedures. ConclusionDespite an overall low rate of Vancouver B perioperative periprosthetic femoral fractures, it is a devastating complication that typically presents within the first 6 weeks after DAA THA surgery. The risk is increased in patients with unfavorable proximal femoral geometry, coronal stem malalignment, advanced age, increased comorbidities, and right-sided procedures.

Effectiveness of distally slotted proximal femoral nails on prevention of femur fractures during and after intertrochanteric femur fracture surgery

IntroductionIntra- and post-operative femoral shaft fractures related with nailing remain of concern. Although manufacturers have sought to solve the problem by providing distally slotted nails, it is not clear that these implants reduce fractures.We compare two distally slotted proximal femoral nails [trochanteric nail (TRON) and proximal femur intramedullary nail (PROFIN)]. Patients and MethodsThe medical records of 195 hips treated with TRONs (distally slotted in four places in the sagittal and coronal planes) and 583 hips treated with PROFINs (distally slotted in two places in the coronal plane) in two institutes were retrospectively evaluated. The inclusion criteria were follow-up for at least 6 months; pertrochanteric fractures and age over 55 years. ResultsIn total, 161 hips in the TRON group and 512 hips in the PROFIN group were included. The mean follow-up time was 28.5 (range: 6–84) months in whole group. The demographic characteristics of the groups were similar. Only 2 intraoperative shaft and 3 proximal lateral cortex fracture was detected in PROFIN group, there wasn’t any postoperative fracture. Four proximal lateral cortex and 2 femur shaft fractures were detected in TRON group (one during operation and one at postoperative 8th month after a fall at pedestrian way). ConclusionsDistal cephalomedullary nail slotting prevented intra- and post-operative femoral fractures. A distal slot 50 mm in length may increase nail elasticity and reduce nail tip stress to a greater extent than a 30-mm slot. Distal slotting in both the sagittal and coronal planes afforded no advantage compared to coronal slotting only. Level of evidenceLevel III retrospective study

Mortality After Periprosthetic Femur Fractures During and After Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

We determined mortality rates after intraoperative and postoperative periprosthetic femur fractures in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). The study population comprised 522 intraoperative and 480 postoperative femur fractures in 26,250 primary THA patients and 590 intraoperative and 224 postoperative femur fractures in 4,532 revision THA patients. The risk of death was examined using Cox regression models. In primary THA, intraoperative periprosthetic femur fractures were not associated with excess risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.86 to 1.22). The risk of death was slightly elevated among primary THA patients with postoperative femur fractures (hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.08 to 1.43), but the excess risk was only confined to patients with comorbid orthopaedic conditions. In revision THA, neither intraoperative nor postoperative periprosthetic femur fractures were associated with excess risk of death. Periprosthetic femur fractures are not associated with excess mortality among primary osteoarthritis patients. Level III.

Does Proximally Coated Single-Wedge Cementless Stem Work Well in Dorr Type C Femurs? Minimum 10-year Followup.

Background:Total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a proximally coated single-wedge (PSW) cementless stem had been generally considered not to be suitable for Dorr Type C femurs. This study compares the long term outcomes of PSW stem according to the type of proximal femoral geometry.Materials and Methods:307 primary THAs in 247 patients were performed with PSW cementless stem and followed up for over 10 years in this retrospective study. According to Dorr's criteria, 89 femurs were classified as Type A, 156 as Type B, and 62 as Type C. They were followed up for an average of 13.2 years (range 10.0–17.3 years). All the hips were evaluated clinically and radiologically.Results:There was no significant difference in stem survivorship and clinical outcomes including the incidence of thigh pain and the mean postoperative Harris hip score (HHS) in all three groups. No significant differences were observed in osteolysis, pedestal formation, or cortical hypertrophy among the groups. Radiolucent lines <2 mm in thickness in Gruen zone 4 and 7 (P = 0.003 and P = 0.044, respectively), spot-weld (P < 0.001), and stress shielding (P = 0.010) of proximal femur were more pronounced in Dorr C type femora than in Type A or B. Fifty-six intraoperative fractures were identified among 307 hips with PSW stems. The incidence of intraoperative or postoperative femoral fractures was not significantly different among the groups.Conclusions:From over a 10-year followup, the PSW stem provided a recommendable option with satisfactory outcomes and excellent stem survivorship regardless of the Dorr type.

Impaction allografting for femoral revision hip arthroplasty. Mid-term results after minimum five year follow-up in 46 cases.

Previously, only short-term follow-up results after femoral revision using impacted allograft and cemented stems the exchange technique have been published. We present the results of 46 femoral exchange revision procedures performed on 42 patients with five to nine years follow-up. At follow-up, five patients had died and two patients did not complete follow-up. Two patients were re-revised. One patient underwent re-revision due to early collapse of the impaction construct. In another patient, stem loosening due to acetabular revision occurred and a full re-revision of the impaction area was performed. One patient suffered late post-operative femoral fracture and three patients experienced hip dislocations. Ninety percent expressed satisfaction with the result. Harris Hip Score (HHS) improved from 36 to 82 (p < 0.001). Radiographically, one patient demonstrated stem subsidence of greater than 5mm. Eighty-six percent demonstrated signs of graft incorporation and only one patient demonstrated signs of loosening. Our results after a minimum of five years follow-up of patients surgically treated with the exchange femoral revision technique demonstrated good clinical and radiological results. With a re-revision rate of 4.3%, one case with subsidence exceeding 5 mm and one case with diaphyseal fracture, we did not observe the problems of subsidence and femoral fractures described in previous studies. (Hip International 2002; 4: 357-64).

Risk factors associated with complications following total hip arthroplasty using the two-incision technique

Background:The frequency of the complications following total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the two-incision technique is well documented. However, few reports have analyzed the preoperative patient–related factors associated with the complications. The purpose of this study was to estimate the incidence of early complications following primary two-incision THA and to define the risk factors associated with perioperative complications.Materials and Methods:The subjects of this retrospective study were 1218 consecutive patients who underwent primary two-incision THA. The incidence of hip dislocation, stem subsidence, intraoperative femoral fracture, and nontraumatic postoperative femoral fracture was evaluated. The association between complications and preoperative patient–related factors, including gender, obesity, Crowe classification, age, body mass index (BMI), and morphological parameters of the proximal femoral medullary cavity, were investigated.Results:The incidences of complications were dislocation (1.1%), stem subsidence (0.9%), intraoperative femoral fracture (1.2%), and postoperative femoral fracture (0.7%). Obesity (BMI &gt; 30) influenced the occurrences of stem subsidence and postoperative femoral fractures ( p = 0.0001, p = 0.019). Crowe classification significantly correlated with intraoperative femoral fractures (Grade II: odds ratio (OR) 4.63, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.32–15.6; Grade III and IV: OR 8.96, 95% CI, 2.2–34.94). Additionally, the outer diameter of the femur 10 cm below the lesser trochanter tended to be small in patients who developed a femoral fracture.Conclusions:The early complication rate was comparable to other methods used in uncemented THA. It is necessary for patients with risk factors revealed in this study to pay careful attention or consider other surgical approaches to avoid complications. Further studies considering femur morphology are required.

大腿骨頸部骨折患者の歩行機能とその予測に関する検討

〔目的〕一般病院では対応が困難で精神科病院に転院してきた大腿骨頸部骨折術後患者の歩行自立率と歩行自立の予測について検討すること，および精神科への理学療法士配置の効果を検証することである．〔対象と方法〕7年3ヵ月間に当院で大腿骨頸部骨折の術後リハを受けた87名について年齢などの基礎情報と歩行能力について調査し重回帰分析を行った．また，予測式からの予測と，開始時FIMからの予測を組み合わせ検討した．〔結果〕受傷前歩行が可能であれば，一般病院でのリハが実施困難でも45.5％の患者が歩行再獲得した．2つの予測で基準を満たした場合，自立の正答率は87.5％であった．〔結論〕予測の正答率は比較的高く，有用であると考えられた．

Distal locking in short hip nails: Cause or prevention of peri-implant fractures?

ObjectivesThe most common cause of femoral fractures after osteosynthesis of trochanteric fractures with short nails is weakening of the femoral cortex via distal locking and stress concentrations at the tip of the nail. The aim of the study was to verify whether the incidence of peri-implant fractures is dependent upon the distal locking technique. MethodsWe prospectively analysed a group of 849 pertrochanteric fractures (AO/ASIF 31-A1+2) managed with short nails from 2009 to 2013. Unlocked nailing was performed in 70.1% and distal dynamic locking was performed in 29.9%. The mean age was 82.0 years. Peri-implant fractures were divided into 3 groups according to the height of the fracture in relation to the tip of the nail. ResultsIn total 17 fractures (2.0%) were detected. One peri-implant fracture occurred after locked nailing, whereas 16 cases occurred after unlocked nailing (p=0.037). Patients without distal locking had an 85.7% greater risk of peri-implant fracture. Fractures of the proximal femur (Type I) occurred significantly earlier than fractures at the tip of the nail (Type II) (p=0.028). ConclusionUnlocked nails do not guarantee sufficient stability. Distal locking serves to prevent postoperative femoral fractures. We recommend the routine use of distal locking when utilizing short nails.

Femoral Neck Fracture After Arthroscopic Femoroplasty of the Hip.

Hip arthroscopy is an increasingly common procedure, particularly for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. Various complications have been previously reported, and the authors sought to further evaluate the safety of this procedure. This study was conducted to identify the incidence of femoral neck fracture as well as treatment and outcomes after arthroscopic femoroplasty. In April 2013, a survey was administered to 28 established hip arthroscopists regarding the breadth of their experience, including the total number of hip arthroscopies and proximal femoroplasties performed and the number of postoperative femoral neck fractures. Fracture type, patient age, patient sex, time to fracture, comorbidities, treatments, and outcomes were queried. The study identified 27,200 total arthroscopies and 14,945 proximal femoroplasties performed by the surgeons, with 11 postoperative proximal femur fractures. The incidence of proximal femur fracture after arthroscopic femoroplasty was 0.07%, based on combined data of high-volume hip arthroscopists at multiple medical centers. Mean time to fracture after arthroscopic femoroplasty was 40.5 (±26.6) days postoperatively. The male-to-female ratio was approximately 1:3 for those with fracture, and mean patient age was 52 (±13) years. More than half of the fractures were caused by violation of weight-bearing precautions. All patients had improvement in symptoms after treatment. Femoral neck fracture after arthroscopic femoroplasty is a rare complication for established hip arthroscopists. It is most common in women and patients older than 50 years. Treatment is based on the severity of the fracture, and patients have improved outcomes after treatment.

Is the Anterior Approach Safe? Early Complication Rate Associated With 5090 Consecutive Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Procedures Performed Using the Anterior Approach

BackgroundFew publications have raised concern with the safety of the anterior approach (AA) to total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study is to report the early complications with AA THA in a combined, multicenter patient population from three different institutions. MethodsThe study cohort consisted of 5090 consecutive primary procedures in 4473 patients who had undergone THA utilizing the anterior approach between August 2006 and July 2013. Surgeries were performed by five surgeons at three sites that maintain prospective databases. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were recorded on all patients. Demographic data including age, gender, and BMI were queried, as well as all intraoperative and postoperative complications in the first 90 days. ResultsThe 5090 patients had a mean body mass index of 27.5, and mean age of 63.6 years. The overall 90-day complication rate was 1.9%. There were 41 intraoperative femur fractures including 29 calcar fractures, 9 greater trochanter fractures and 3 femoral shaft fractures. There were 7 postoperative femur fractures including 3 greater trochanter fractures, 2 calcar fractures, and 2 femur fractures. Other complications included 15 superficial infections, 5 deep infections, 12 dislocations, 8 hematomas, 3 cases of cellulitis, 2 sciatic nerve palsies, 1 peroneal nerve palsy, and intrapelvic bleed. The nonsurgical complication rate was 1.4%. Deep vein thrombosis occurred in 0.3% of cases. ConclusionThis large multicenter study of consecutive AA THAs demonstrates an acceptable risk profile within the first 90 days after surgery.

Early Postoperative Femur Fracture After Uncemented Collarless Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Characterization and Results of Treatment

Thirty Vancouver type B periprosthetic fractures occurred within 90 days of total hip arthroplasty were identified using two institutional databases. Twenty-eight of these fractures were of a stereotyped fracture pattern consisting of a displaced fracture of the femoral neck including the lesser trochanter and a variable amount of the proximal medial femoral cortex creating a roughly triangular fragment. Time from operation until fracture was 2–88days (mean 28). Mechanism of injury was fall from standing height in 12, no defined trauma in 11, stumble without fall in 5, and twisting motion in 2. Fracture treatment consisted of femoral revision in 24, fracture fixation in two, and nonoperative in four. Of the 24 treated with revision, 21 had healed fractures and stable revision stems.

Do Modern Femoral Stems Break?

In the 1960s and 70s hip arthroplasty was in its infancy. During that time the occurrence of post-operative prosthetic femoral stem fracture was much greater than it is today. However as stem design and materials evolved along with superior cement and cementing techniques, rates of femoral stem fracture radically decreased, at present it is considered a rarity. We present two cases of fractured prosthetic femoral stems, detail the method of failure and the risk factors all surgeons should be aware of to minimize the risk femoral stem fracture.

The Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Critical Analysis Review.

Periprosthetic fractures at the site of a total hip replacement may occur intraoperatively or postoperatively and may involve the femur, the acetabulum, or both. The present review concerns only postoperative femoral fractures, with a brief overview of the evidence supporting the treatment of these injuries. It is not feasible to present an exhaustive description of all of the relevant studies regarding this topic, but we have searched widely to determine the levels of evidence to support our treatment recommendations. As will be seen, there is a paucity of Level-I and II research regarding periprosthetic femoral fractures, and additional study is required regarding almost every aspect of their treatment. It is difficult to assess the true prevalence of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty. Most joint registries only record cases in which the fracture pattern necessitates revision surgery. The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register is designed to record all periprosthetic fractures and includes codes for internal fixation as well as revision arthroplasty. A review of Swedish registry data from 1979 to 2000 demonstrated that the cumulative prevalence of periprosthetic fracture was 0.4% after primary arthroplasty and 2.1% after revision arthroplasty1. The Vancouver classification system2 is the most widely accepted system for categorizing postoperative fractures of the femur occurring around a hip prosthesis (Fig. 1). Studies have demonstrated the reliability and validity of this system when used by both experienced surgeons and junior staff alike3-5. The Vancouver classification system takes into account three relevant surgical factors: …

Femoral revision with impaction bone grafting and a cemented polished tapered stem

Biological repair of femoral bone loss using bone impaction grafting. Reconstruction of the centre of rotation of the hip using a cemented stem, the size and offset of which are at the discretion of the surgeon. Femoral implant loosening with bone loss. Infection, neurological disorders, noncompliant patient. Extraction of the loose femoral implant, cortical reconstruction using meshes if required, impaction bone grafting with special instruments, cement fixation of a polished tapered stem. Individualized period of bed rest and limited weight bearing. Impaction bone grafting and a cemented polished stem were used to perform 33femoral reconstructions. After a mean follow-up of 15years, no femoral reconstruction had to be revised. One unrecognized intraoperative fracture healed after nonsurgical treatment, three postoperative femoral fractures healed after plate fixation with the stem left in situ. The average Harris Hip Score improved from 49prior to surgery to 85points thereafter. Kaplan-Meier analysis with femoral revision for any reason as the end point showed a survival rate of 100 %.

Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus dynamic hip screw for intertrochanteric fracture in elders: a meta-analysis

To assess the efficacies of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) versus dynamic hip screw (DHS) for intertrochanteric fracture in elders. The databases of PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, CBM, CNKI and WANFANG were searched for the relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to May 18, 2013. After quality evaluation and data extraction by two authors independently, meta-analyses were performed with the RevMan5.1 software. And the levels of evidence were evaluated by the GRADEprofile 3.6 software. A total of 17 studies (n = 1 344) were included and there were 656 patients in PFNA group and 688 in DHS respectively. Meta-analyses showed that, as compared with DHS, PFNA could significantly decrease fixation failure rate (odds ratio (OR) = 0.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [0.12, 0.57], P = 0.0008), reduce average fracture healing time (weighted mean difference (WMD) = -15.11, 95%CI = [-24.36, -5.85], P = 0.001), improve excellent and good rate for Harris score (OR = 0.29, 95%CI = [0.15, 0.56], P = 0.0002), yield a higher Harris score (WMD = 6.88, 95%CI = [0.96, 12.80], P = 0.02) and reduce the rate of coxa vara (OR = 0.40, 95%CI = [0.18,0.92], P = 0.03). However, there was no statistical significance in 1-year mortality, postoperative nonunion and delayed union, postoperative femoral head necrosis, postoperative femoral fractures or femoral head necrosis. The importance of outcomes was "critical". And the level of evidences based on the GRADE approach was from "very low" to "low". PFNA is superior to DHS. Due to the limitations of the included studies, more large-sample and high-quality RCTs are required. And subgroup analysis based on fracture types should be performed.

Are short fully coated stems adequate for "simple" femoral revisions?

Many studies suggest long femoral components should be used in revision THA. However, longer stems are more difficult to insert and reduce femoral bone stock for future revisions. We investigated (1) how frequently a short (≤ 160-mm or primary-length) fully porous-coated stem could be utilized for Paprosky Type I to IIIA femoral defects, (2) how often the tip of the old stem or cement mantle was bypassed by the revision implant, (3) Harris hip scores, radiographic signs of osseointegration, and revision frequency, and (4) complications associated with these reconstructions. Two surgeons performed 277 femoral revisions graded as Paprosky Types I to IIIA between 2004 and 2009. When femoral canal diameter was less than 18 mm, these surgeons generally used the shortest stem capable of achieving a minimum of 4 cm of scratch fit in the femoral isthmus. Patients were evaluated clinically using the Harris hip score and radiographically for component loosening and to determine whether the revision component bypassed the prior stem tip or cement mantle. A short stem was utilized in 144 of the 277 revisions (52%). In 113 (78%), the revision femoral component did not bypass the tip of the prior stem or cement mantle. The Harris hip score improved (p < 0.001) from 36 preoperatively to 76 at a mean of 4 years (range, 2-8 years). Twelve stems required repeat revision including six (4.9%) for failed ingrowth. Complications included four intraoperative fractures, three postoperative femoral fractures, one cortical perforation, and eight dislocations. Primary-length extensively coated stems provided reliable fixation for ½ of our Paprosky Type I to IIIA femoral revisions. When considering the use of such a component, the revision surgeon should take into account a small risk of failed osseointegration and technical challenges associated with this technique.

Medium-Term Follow-Up of a Modular Tapered Noncemented Titanium Stem in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Single-Surgeon Experience

We report a single-surgeon experience with a noncemented modular revision shaft (Modular Prosthesis; LINK, Hamburg, Germany) with clinical and radiographic results of 63 patients after 10 years. The Harris Hip Score improved from 51 to 84 points. Intraoperative complications included 11 fractures. Four patients had postoperative femoral fractures. Further shaft revisions were necessary: 1 subsidence, 1 late fracture, 1 late deep infection. Sixty-eight percent of cases showed revision defects as graded 3° by Mallory; 95 % did not show signs of loosening or subsidence; 38 patients showed adequate bone remodeling in the shaft and proximal femur; 21 patients showed excellent recovery of preoperative osteolytic areas, and 5 patients did not show signs of remodeling. The Modular Prosthesis stem shows adequate fixation and tendency toward satisfactory bone remodeling after 10 years.

Predictors of Femoral Neck Fracture Following Hip Resurfacing: A Cadaveric Study

We aimed to establish if radiological parameters, dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and quantitative CT (qCT) could predict the risk of sustaining a femoral neck fracture following hip resurfacing. Twenty-one unilateral fresh frozen femurs were used. Each femur had a plain digital anteroposterior radiograph, DEXA scan and qCT scan. Femurs were then prepared for a Birmingham Hip Resurfacing femoral component and loaded to failure. Results demonstrated that gender and qCT measurements showed strong correlation with failure load. QCT could be used as an individual measure to predict risk of post-operative femoral neck fracture. However, when qCT is unavailable; gender, pre-operative DEXA scan and Neck Width measurements can be used together to assess risk of post-operative femoral neck fracture in patients due to undergo hip resurfacing.

Impaction bone grafting for femoral revision hip arthroplasty with Exeter Universal stem in Japan

The purpose of the present study was to analyze the retrospective clinical and radiographic results of femoral revision arthroplasties with impaction bone grafting performed by experienced Japanese surgeons. We investigated the radiographic and clinical records more than 2 years after the surgery in 99 hips of 93 patients. The average age was 66.3 years (36-84 years) and the average follow-up period was 5.2 years (2-13 years). The Merle d'Aubigné and Postel hip score was used for clinical assessment, and peri-operative fractures were recorded. The survival curve was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. The mean Merle d'Aubigné and Postel hip score improved from 9.0 points to 15.2 points at the final follow-up. Augmentations for segmental defect of femoral cortices were undertaken in 55 hips. Metal or strut allograft plates were applied to 9 hips and 21 hips, respectively. Intra-operative fractures or perforations occurred in 20 hips. Re-operations of the femur were undertaken in nine hips including five post-operative femoral fractures. More than 5 mm of subsidence was observed in only 2 hips. The survival rates at 8 years after the operation were 94.8 % with femoral fractures as the end point, 93.1 % with any stem removal or exchange as the end point, and 99.0 % with aseptic stem loosening as the end point, respectively. The present study showed encouraging mid-term results of impaction bone grafting for femoral revision arthroplasty by experienced surgeons in Japan. Aggressive augmentation of segmental defects and attenuated femoral shafts prevents massive stem subsidence and periprosthetic fracture.