Postoperative Endoscopy Scores Research Articles

Impact of Sinus CT Severity Score on the Outcomes of Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in Eosinophilic CRSwNP.

Eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (eos-CRSwNP), especially those with diffuse disease as indicated by CT scans, has high recurrence rate and low control rate after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Most of them are difficult to treat. This study sought to identify if eos-CRSwNP patients were to undergo surgery earlier, while the disease is still limited on CT, they might achieve better postoperative outcomes. This study enrolled eos-CRSwNP patients with different degree of sinus involvement who underwent primary ESS and compared the surgical outcomes of the patients exhibiting mild sinus involvement with those displaying severe sinus involvement. The demographic data, preoperative disease severity, and surgery outcomes at 1 year postoperatively were collected. CRS control status was the primary endpoint to evaluate the outcomes. This study included 118 patients with at least one-year follow-up. The overall uncontrolled rate was 33.1% at 1 year postoperatively. The best cut-off value for CT Lund-Mackay (L-M) score was 13 to predict the uncontrolled status (AUC = 0.67). Then, patients were divided into the mild group (L-M < 13, n = 70) and the severe group (L-M ≥ 13, n = 48) according to L-M score. The follow-up data indicated that 24.3% of patients (17/70) in the mild group and 45.8% of patients (22/48) in the severe group were uncontrolled (p = 0.015). Postoperative endoscopic score in the mild group was significantly better than those in the severe group (p = 0.002). ESS performed on eos-CRSwNP patients with mild sinus involvement have better postoperative outcomes at 1 year than patients with severe sinus involvement. Level 3 Laryngoscope, 2024.

MicroRNA-125b Is a Potential Predictor of Surgical Outcomes in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps.

Despite advances in surgical techniques, recurrence rates after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) remain high and difficult to predict. This study aimed to evaluate the potential role of microRNA 125b (miR-125b) in predicting disease evolution following ESS. We conducted a prospective study including patients undergoing first ESS for CRSwNP in our department between January 2020 and November 2021. We determined miR-125b levels from nasal polyps and pursued a standardized follow-up for at least 18 months for each patient. A total of 86 patients were included in the study. Higher postoperative endoscopy scores were associated with more severe disease at presentation on computed tomography scan, presence of concomitant asthma, and higher values of miR-125b. Even after multivariate repeated measures analysis and adjustments for confounders, miR-125b remained statistically significant. Moreover, miR-125 was the most important factor in predicting disease evolution at 18 months. A clear, robust relation between nasal polyp control evaluated through objective measures and miR-125b values was observed. This finding indicates the potential role of miR-125b in predicting the course of the disease following ESS.

The use of different intranasal splints Doyle splints versus Reuter bivalve splints versus no splints in primary septal surgeries: A randomised clinical trial looking at morbidity.

The objective of this study is to compare the morbidity of different types of intranasal splints (Doyle splints and Reuter bivalve splints) with no intranasal splints in primary septal surgeries and concomitant submucosal reduction of the inferior turbinate. Randomised clinical trial SETTING: Single-Center trial at a tertiary care facility PARTICIPANTS: In this randomised clinical trial, 123 consecutive patients underwent primary septoplasty with bilateral submucosal reduction of the inferior turbinate, with no other concurrent procedure. Patients were randomised into three groups: Doyle splints, Reuter bivalve splints and patients with no splints placed. Following surgery, the patients were seen at three consecutive visits. During each visit, the Visual Analogue Scale score for headache, nasal obstruction, overall pain and bleeding and an endoscopic score for secretions, oedema and synechiae was filled. Patients were randomised into three groups, 42 received Doyle splints, 41 Reuter bivalve splints and 40 had no splints inserted. When comparing the three groups, the first two post-op visits were scheduled significantly earlier in patients with splints (p < .05). The scores from both groups with splints were statistically higher for headache, nasal obstruction and pain, for the first visit only (p < .05). There was no statistical difference between groups when looking at each subset of the endoscopic score, at each visit (p > .05). Increased post-operative pain, headaches and nasal obstruction scores were encountered in patients who had splints after surgery. However, endoscopic scores were statistically similar across the three groups with no difference in post-operative endoscopic scores at each visit. and no difference was seen in symptom scores and endoscopic scores between patients with different splints.

Usefulness of post-operative endoscopic score for optimal treatment selection in recurrent eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis.

This study retrospectively analysed post-operative endoscopic scores to determine the optimal post-operative treatment in patients with eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery. In total, 339 adults who underwent initial bilateral functional endoscopic sinus surgery for eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis were enrolled. Patients were divided into group A, which required no additional post-operative treatment; group B, which required local/systemic steroids post-operatively; and group C, which further required dupilumab and/or revision surgery. Sixty-five per cent of patients could be treated with initial functional endoscopic sinus surgery (group A). Post-operative steroids were required in 35 per cent of patients with a post-operative endoscopic score of 30 per cent (group B). Further advanced treatments with dupilumab and/or revision functional endoscopic sinus surgery were required in 10 per cent of patients with a post-operative endoscopic score of 65 per cent (group C). The post functional endoscopic sinus surgery endoscopic score can be used as an index to determine treatment at the time of eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis recurrence.

Correlation between Preoperative Osteitis Degree with Postoperative Endoscopic Score in Chronic Rhinosinusitis

BACKGROUND: In chronic rhinosinusitis patients, there is a subgroup of patients with persistent symptoms after treatment, who often shows bone thickening and remodeling in their paranasal sinuses and described as osteitis. Osteitis can be evaluated by several methods, one of which is the Global Osteitis Score (GOS) AIM: To analyse the correlation between preoperative osteitis degree with the postoperative endoscopic scores in chronic rhinosinusitis METHOD: It was an observational study with cross-sectional design. We use GOS from CT scan before surgery and Lund Mackay’s endoscopic score 4 weeks after Functional Endoscopy Sinus Surgery (FESS). The analysis performed with Spearman correlation test. RESULT: There were 30 patients as subjects. There statistical analysis test between preoperative osteitis degree with post operative endoscopic score showed p = 0.296 with r = 0.197. The analysis result between risk factors for wound healing with the postoperative endoscopic score were allergic rhinitis (p = 1.000), polyps (p = 0.624), and smoking (p = 0.309) CONCLUSION: There is no significant correlation between preoperative osteitis degree with the postoperative endoscopic score, but there is a tendency for a positive correlation between preoperative osteitis degree with the postoperative endoscopic score. There was no significant correlation between allergic rhinitis, polyps, and smoking habits with postoperative endoscopic score

Early postoperative endoscopic score can predict the long-term endoscopic outcomes in eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (ECRS) patients

ObjectiveEosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis (ECRS) is refractory and recurrent, requiring long-term follow-up after Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (ESS). Endoscopic evaluation is common during postoperative assessment, but how the findings vary over time in postoperative ECRS patients who were treated by the recent standardized management is unclear. We assessed the long-term change in postoperative endoscopic score in ECRS patients using a novel endoscopic scoring system (Escore). MethodsThis retrospective study included 80 ECRS patients who underwent full-house ESS and were followed for longer than 1-year. Endoscopic procedures were repeated at every follow-up visit and postoperative Escores were assessed from 3-months up to 5-years (median follow-up period was 3-years). ResultsThe Escore did not significantly change from that at 3-months (3m-Escore). The Escore at the final observation point (f-Escore) among 80 patients was 9.2 ± 5.6 and there was no significant difference from the 3m-Escore (8.5 ± 4.1, p = 0.363). Twenty-one patients (21/80, 26.3%) were considered to have endoscopically uncontrolled ECRS at their final observation points and the 3m-Escore was identified as an independent predictive factor by multivariate logistic regression analysis. The 3m-Escore cut-off value that was able to predict endoscopically uncontrolled ECRS after long-term follow-up was ≥12. ConclusionWe demonstrated the long-term endoscopic outcomes after full-house ESS and continuous outpatient treatment. Early endoscopic findings (3m-Escore) were a potential predictive factor for the later endoscopic outcome, and a 3m-Escore of 12 or higher may be an indicator of the poor long-term prognosis of sinus mucosa. Level of evidence4.

Comparison between the endoscopic scores of bolgerization versus partial resection of the middle turbinate for management of the postoperative lateralization in the early follow-up period after endoscopic frontal sinusotomy: A randomized controlled study

BackgroundFrontal sinusotomy is a challenging procedure that needs meticulous handling due to its unique anatomical position. Postoperative middle turbinate lateralization is critical comorbidity for the success rate, and many techniques are adopted to prevent it. The study aimed to compare the effect of middle turbinate bolgerization and partial resection on the postoperative endoscopic scores and assess their impact on the middle meatus and the frontal recess outcome. Patient and methodsThis prospective study was conducted on forty-one patients undergoing bilateral frontal sinusotomy for chronic frontal sinusitis. Nasal cavities were randomized so that partial middle turbinate resection technique was done alternately with bolgerization approach in every patient. Each participant acted as their control. Both sides were compared using Lund Kennedy Endoscopic Score (LKES) and Perioperative Sinus Endoscopy Score (POSE) at the baseline, 1st, 3rd, and 12th-month intervals postoperatively. Also, middle turbinate status was assessed at the end of the 12th-month interval using POSE score. ResultsThe total frontal sinus patency rate was 82.9% (63/76 operated sinus). Baseline scores, LKES (3.79 ± 0.777 vs 4.05 ± 0.769, p = 0.142, for the side of resection and the side for bolgerization respectively) and POSE (1.79 ± 0.413 vs 1.82 ± 0.393, p = 0.777, for the side of resection and the side for bolgerization respectively). Regarding LKES, the differences between both operated sides were fluctuating with p values: 0.001*, 0.171, and 0.044* for the 1st, 3rd, and 12th months follow-up intervals, respectively. Regarding the POSE score of the frontal sinus, the difference between both groups was steadily increasing with p values: 0.318, 0.119, and 0.017* for the 1st, 3rd, and 12th months follow-up intervals. The middle turbinate's POSE score at the 12th month was significantly higher in the side allocated for bolgerization (p-value = 0.008*). ConclusionPartial middle turbinate resection showed favorable endoscopic outcomes than bolgerization at the 12th month follow up period in patients undergoing primary ESS for chronic frontal sinusitis.

The efficacy of hemostatic powder for chronic rhinosinusitis in endoscopic sinus surgery: a prospective, randomised, controlled and single blinded clinical trial

Objective: To study the efficacy and patient comfort of absorbable hemostatic powder after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Methods: A total of 21 (17 males, 4 females) patients with an average age of 42(ranging from 18 to 65) underwent bilateral ESS for chronic rhinosinusitis(CRS) in Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University between October 2015 and July 2019 were enrolled to compare the effect of absorbable hemostasis powder with Nasopore using an intrapatient control design. A randomized controlled trial was conducted in the left and right nasal cavities of the same patient. If hemostatic powder was applied in the experiment nasal cavity, the Nasopore was applied in the control nasal cavity. The mean preoperative sinus computed tomography (CT) score was 6.25. All patients competed for symptom diaries using a visual analog scale (VAS, score out of 10) at baseline, through 1, 7, 14 and 30 days. Outcomes including bleeding, facial pain, nasal obstruction, nasal discharges using VAS were recorded separately for both sides. Postoperative endoscopic scores were also investigated. SPSS 22 and Graphpad prism 8.0 statistical softwares were used for the analysis. Paired t-test or nonparametric test was used between the test side and the control side. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Results: The bleeding score and total nasal symptom VAS scores at postoperative days (POD) 1, 7, 14 and 30 were not significantly different(t=1.341, 0.552, 0.631, 0.158, all P>0.05;t=0.944, 1.471, 1.612, 2.251, all P>0.05). There was no significant difference between absorbable hemostasis powder and Nasopore side on POD 1, 7, 14 and 30 in terms of each nasal symptom VAS scores(all P>0.05). On POD 1, 7 and 14, the packing material degeneration scores of the absorbable hemostasis powder side were significantly lower than those of the Nasopore side [(1.33±0.21)vs(2.00±0.00),(0.38±0.18) vs (1.95±0.22), 0 vs (1.80±0.13), all P<0.01]. There were significant differences between absorbable hemostasis powder and Nasopore side on POD 1, 7, 14 and 30 in terms of endoscopic scores (edema, crusting, discharges, scar, polyps and material degeneration, t=3.07, 7.00, 6.41, 2.69, all P<0.05). Conclusions: The absorbable hemostasis powder and Nasopore has similar postoperative hemostasis effect. The absorbable hemostasis powder is rapidly cleared and without negative effects on mucosal wound healing 14 days postoperatively.

Prophylactic antibiotics after endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled noninferiority clinical trial.

Surgeons commonly prescribe prophylactic antibiotics after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), yet minimal data exist to support this practice. In this study we aimed to assess the impact of post-ESS antibiotics on infection, quality of life (QOL), and endoscopic scores. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, noninferiority trial comparing amoxicillin-clavulanate vs placebo after ESS (NCT01919411, ClinicalTrials.gov). Adults (N = 77) with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) refractory to appropriate medical therapy who underwent ESS were randomized to antibiotics (N = 37) or placebo (N = 40) and followed clinically (mean ± standard deviation: 1.3 ± 0.3 and 8.8 ± 3.9 weeks postoperatively). At baseline and follow-up, QOL was measured with 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test questionnaires and Lund-Kennedy endoscopic scores were evaluated. Outcomes were analyzed with repeated-measures analysis of variance and analysis of covariance and z tests for proportions. Placebo was noninferior to antibiotic prophylaxis with regard to postoperative SNOT-22 scores (β = 0.18, 2-tailed p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the antibiotic and placebo groups in LK score trajectories over time (p = 0.63) or in postoperative infection rates (2.6% vs 2.4%, respectively; p = 0.96). The rate of diarrhea was significantly higher in the antibiotic group (24.3% vs 2.5%; relative risk = 10.8; p = 0.02). Although statistically underpowered, the results suggest placebo was noninferior to prophylactic antibiotics after ESS for CRS regarding postoperative sinonasal-specific QOL. There were no significant differences in postoperative endoscopic scores or rates of infection, but the rate of diarrhea was significantly higher in the antibiotic group. These findings add to the growing evidence that routine use of prophylactic postoperative antibiotics does not improve outcomes post-ESS and significantly increases the rate of diarrhea.

Long-term outcomes of endoscopic sinus surgery in the management of adult chronic rhinosinusitis.

There is a striking lack of long-term, prospective outcomes data for endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) using validated instruments. Our primary objective in this study was to report long-term outcomes (>10 years) after ESS for CRS obtained by prospective data collection. An observational cohort (n = 59) of adult patients with CRS electing ESS was enrolled between 2004 and 2008. Long-term, disease-specific quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes, health utility values (HUV), revision surgery rate, development of asthma, and patient expectations/satisfaction with outcomes of ESS were examined using descriptive statistics and simple fixed-effects linear modeling. Fifty-nine adult patients were followed for 10.9 years (±13.8 months), on average. Mean QOL significantly improved between baseline and 6 months and remained durable to 10 years. HUV improved to normal. A 17% revision surgery rate within the 10-year follow-up period was observed with a 25% revision rate in CRS with polyposis. New-onset asthma after ESS occurred at a rate of 0.8%/year. Patient satisfaction with ESS outcomes was generally high. Ten-year prospective outcomes of ESS for CRS demonstrate that the initial clinically significant improvements in QOL seen 6 months postoperatively are durable over the long term. Over 75% of patients reported clinically significant long-term QOL and HUV improvement. HUV returned to normal. Revision surgery rate was 17% and worse postoperative endoscopy scores within 18 months of initial ESS were associated with higher likelihood of revision surgery. Most patients would pursue ESS again and recommend the procedure to other patients considering this treatment option.

Ischemic gastropathy after distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection versus distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic body/tail cancer

BackgroundIschemic gastropathy (IG) is a major complication after distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection (DP-CAR) for locally advanced body/tail pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and its incidence is still unknown. MethodsTo evaluate the occurrence of IG, 77 and 18 consecutive patients with body/tail PDAC were analyzed in a retrospective and a prospective study, respectively. We utilized perioperative gastroendoscopy, Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) score, and quantitative assessment for gastric arterial blood flow using the HyperEye Medical System (HEMS) with indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging in the prospective arm. ResultsIn the retrospective arm, no significant difference was noted in the occurrence rate of IG between the DP-CAR (8.7%) and DP groups (5.5%). In the prospective arm, the postoperative endoscopic scores were significantly higher in the DP-CAR group (45%) than in the DP group (11%) (p < .0007) despite no difference in the GIQLI score. The ICG-HEMS imaging system demonstrated more delayed arterial flow velocity in the IG (+) group (p < .028), but showed no significant difference in arterial flow volume compared to the IG (−) group. ConclusionThis is the first demonstration assessing IG incidence after DP-CAR using multiple methods. Despite the high IG rate, gastric arterial flow volume was almost equally maintained in DP-CAR patients with or without IG compared with the DP group. We should note the fact that many of the IG patients do not present with typical symptoms, and proper treatment is required for those “silent” IG patients.

The relationship between endoscopic and radiologic findings and olfactory status of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps before and after the endoscopic sinus surgery.

This study was attempted to investigate the relationship between radiologic and endoscopic findings and pre- and post-operative olfactory scores in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. In this study, 40 patients aged 19-64years with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery were involved. The patients' olfactory status was evaluated using Smell Identification Test (Iran SIT) before and 3months after the surgery. Patients' nasal endoscopic signs were recorded using Modified Lund-Kennedy scoring system before and 3months after the surgery and radiological symptoms were recorded based on Lund-Mackay CT scoring before the surgery. Then the relationship between olfactory status and endoscopic and radiological findings was investigated. With respect to mean of olfactory score, a significant difference was observed before and after the surgery (p value = 0.001). There was a significant difference between means of pre- and post-operative endoscopy scores (p value = 0.001). Pre-operative endoscopic and CT scan scores had a negative correlation with pre- and post-operative olfactory scores (p value < 0.05). Pre-op. olfactory scores had negative correlation with post-op. endoscopy scores (p value = 0.02). Post-op. olfactory scores had negative correlation with post-op. endoscopy scores but was not statistically significant (p value = 0.22). Our results revealed that pre-operative endoscopy and radiology findings were consistent with the olfactory status of patients with CRSwNP before and after endoscopic sinus surgery.

The effect of maxillary sinus antrostomy size on the sinus microbiome.

The optimal maxillary antrostomy size to surgically treat sinusitis is not well known. In this study, we examined clinical metrics of disease severity and symptom scores, measured secreted inflammatory markers, and characterized the sinus microbiome to determine if there were significant differences in outcome between different maxillary ostial sizes. Prospective randomized, single-blinded clinical trial enrolling 12 individuals diagnosed with recurrent acute or chronic rhinosinusitis. Each patient was blinded and randomized to receive minimal maxillary ostial dilation via balloon sinuplasty on 1 side vs a mega-antrostomy on the contralateral side. Data collected included symptom scores (20-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test [SNOT-20]), endoscopy, and radiologic Lund-Mackay scores. During surgery and at their postoperative visit swabs were obtained from each maxillary sinus, and 16S DNA and inflammatory cytokine levels analyzed. The use of each patient as their own control allowed us to minimize confounding variables. There was statistically significant improvement in SNOT-20 symptom scores postoperatively in all patients. There were no significant differences between maxillary ostial size in postoperative endoscopy scores, cytokine profile, or bacterial burden. There were statistically significant differences in relative postoperative abundance of Staphylococcus, Lactococcus, and Cyanobacteria between the mega-antrostomy and mini-antrostomy. The method used in surgical maxillary antrostomies had no effect on endoscopy scores or cytokine profiles. Microbiome analysis determined significant differences between the different antrostomy sizes in postoperative Staphylococcus, Lactococcus, and Cyanobacteria abundance. The clinical significance of these changes in the sinus microbiome are not known but may be a result of increased access to postoperative sinonasal irrigations.

Role of corticosteroids in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery - a systematic review and meta-analysis

The aim of our study is to systematically review the existing evidence on the role of corticosteroids in patients undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). Systematic search of MEDLINE (1950- 2014), EMBASE (1980-2014), metaRegister, Cochrane Library and ISI conference proceedings was carried out. Eighteen randomised controlled trials with 1309 patients were included. Use of local and/or systemic corticosteroids with FESS was reported in four categories; operative, anaesthesia related, post-operative outcomes and risk of recurrence. Meta-analysis for operative outcomes demonstrated that, mean operative time (MD -10.70 minutes; 95% CI -15.86, -5.55; P <0.0001) and mean estimated blood loss (MD -28.32 mls; 95% CI -40.93, -15.72; P <0.0001) was significantly lower; and surgical field quality (MD -0.81; 95% CI -1.32, -0.30; P = 0.002) was significantly better in corticosteroid group. Meta-analysis showed that post-operative endoscopic scores (SMD -0.39; 95% CI -0.60, -0.17; P = 0.0004) were significantly better in corticosteroid group compared to no corticosteroid group. There was no increase in risk of sinusitis (RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.32, 1.30; P = 0.22) between use of corticosteroids and no corticosteroids; There was no significant difference in recurrence risk of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) in mixed population studies (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.35, 1.70; P = 0.52) between the two groups but analysis of studies reporting on chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) (RR 0.64;95% CI 0.45,0.91;P=0.01) showed significant difference in favour of the corticosteroid group. Pre-operative use of local and/or systemic corticosteroids in FESS, results in significantly reduced blood loss, shorter operative time and improved surgical field quality. Studies are limited on the intra-operative use of corticosteroids to reduce postoperative pain. Postoperative corticosteroids improve postoperative endoscopic scores in CRS and recurrence rates in cases of CRSwNP.

Effects of mobile phone WeChat services improve adherence to corticosteroid nasal spray treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a 3-month follow-up study.

The objective of the study is to investigate the impact of receiving daily WeChat services on one's cell phone on adherence to corticosteroid nasal spray treatment in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) patients after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). This study was a two-arm, randomized, follow-up investigation. Patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with/without nasal polyps following bilateral FESS were randomised to receive, or to not receive, daily WeChat service on their cell phone to take corticosteroid nasal spray treatment. A prescription of budesonide aqueous nasal spray 128µg bid was given to all the subjects. Then they returned to the clinic after 30, 60, 90days. The primary study outcome was adherence to nasal spray treatment, whereas secondary outcomes were change in endoscopic findings and SinoNasal Outcome Test-20 (SNOT-20). On the whole, there was a significant inter-group difference in the change of adherence rate (F=90.88, p=0.000). The WeChat group had much higher adherence rate than the control group during the follow-up. In terms of postoperative endoscopic scores and SNOT-20, except granulation score, no significant differences were observed between the two randomization groups. WeChat services are already after a short period of observation associated with improved adherence to corticosteroid nasal spray treatment in CRS patients after FESS.

Effects of triamcinolone-impregnated nasal dressing on subjective and objective outcomes following endoscopic sinus surgery.

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of triamcinolone (TA)- and saline-soaked biodegradable nasal dressing on subjective symptoms, wound healing and improvement of olfactory dysfunction in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) after undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). The study was a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. A total of 80 patients undergoing bilateral ESS for CRSwNP were enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups. Nasal dressing was impregnated with normal saline in the control group, while patients received triamcinolone-impregnated dressing in the TA group. Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 20 (SNOT-20) and Korean Version of the Sniffin' Stick (KVSS) II test were used to assess the patients' condition preoperatively and at postoperative 1 and 3months. Lund-Kennedy (L-K) and perioperative sinus endoscopy (POSE) scores were assessed on postoperative months 1, 2, and 3. There were significant differences between the control group and the TA group in terms of postoperative L-K scores and POSE scores at 1 and 2months. The postoperative endoscopic scores were significantly decreased in the TA group compared to the control at 1month. Olfactory functions were significantly improved at postoperative 3months (p=0.0099) compared to the preoperative score in the TA group. Significant improvement in the olfactory functions among anosmic and hyposmic patients at postoperative 1month (p=0.0475) and 3months (p=0.0019) compared to their preoperative olfactory function score was observed only in the TA group. TA-impregnated dressing had a significant advantage over saline-soaked dressing with regard to postoperative wound healing and improvement of olfactory function.

Extensive versus functional endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and asthma: A 1-year study.

Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is considered to be the standard procedure for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). However, for CRSwNP that accompanies asthma, the results are not satisfying. Extensive endoscopic sinus surgery (EESS) aimed at reducing the inflammatory load has been indicated as a viable option for refractory chronic rhinosinusitis. To evaluate the clinical outcomes and safety of EESS (middle turbinate and superior turbinate resection and total ethmoidectomy) for patients with CRSwNP and with asthma. This was a prospective, single-institute cohort study conducted in a tertiary teaching hospital. Patients with CRSwNP and with asthma who were proceeding to surgery were enrolled. There were 23 patients in the EESS group and 24 patients in the FESS group. The preoperative disease severity was evaluated by the visual analog scale (VAS), Lund-Kennedy (L-K) endoscopy score, computed tomography Lund-Mackay score, asthma control test (ACT), and pulmonary function test. Clinical outcomes were comparatively evaluated between the two groups after a 1-year follow-up by using the VAS score, the postoperative endoscopic score (E score), L-K score, ACT score, and pulmonary function test. The disease severity (general VAS score, endoscopic L-K score, computed tomography score, ACT score) showed no significant differences between the two groups before surgery (p > 0.05). One year after surgery, both groups achieved significant improvement in the VAS score and endoscopic L-K score. The EESS group showed better improvement in the olfactory VAS score and E score compared with the FESS group (mean [standard deviation] change of olfactory VAS, 6.00 ± 3.67 versus 3.30 ± 3.44, p = 0.015; mean [standard deviation] E score, 0.31 ± 0.18 versus 0.66 ± 0.26, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in the change of general nasal symptom VAS score, other individual VAS scores (nasal congestion, discharge, headache and/or facial pain), L-K score, ACT score, and pulmonary function between the two groups (p > 0.05). EESS for patients with CRSwNP and with asthma may help to improve the subjective olfaction and endoscopic appearance.

Role of corticosteroids in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery--a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The aim of our study is to systematically review the existing evidence on the role of corticosteroids in patients undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). Systematic search of MEDLINE (1950- 2014), EMBASE (1980-2014), metaRegister, Cochrane Library and ISI conference proceedings was carried out. Eighteen randomised controlled trials with 1309 patients were included. Use of local and/or systemic corticosteroids with FESS was reported in four categories; operative, anaesthesia related, post-operative outcomes and risk of recurrence. Meta-analysis for operative outcomes demonstrated that, mean operative time (MD -10.70 minutes; 95% CI -15.86, -5.55; P <0.0001) and mean estimated blood loss (MD -28.32 mls; 95% CI -40.93, -15.72; P <0.0001) was significantly lower; and surgical field quality (MD -0.81; 95% CI -1.32, -0.30; P = 0.002) was significantly better in corticosteroid group. Meta-analysis showed that post-operative endoscopic scores (SMD -0.39; 95% CI -0.60, -0.17; P = 0.0004) were significantly better in corticosteroid group compared to no corticosteroid group. There was no increase in risk of sinusitis (RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.32, 1.30; P = 0.22) between use of corticosteroids and no corticosteroids; There was no significant difference in recurrence risk of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) in mixed population studies (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.35, 1.70; P = 0.52) between the two groups but analysis of studies reporting on chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) (RR 0.64;95% CI 0.45,0.91;P=0.01) showed significant difference in favour of the corticosteroid group. Pre-operative use of local and/or systemic corticosteroids in FESS, results in significantly reduced blood loss, shorter operative time and improved surgical field quality. Studies are limited on the intra-operative use of corticosteroids to reduce postoperative pain. Postoperative corticosteroids improve postoperative endoscopic scores in CRS and recurrence rates in cases of CRSwNP.

Novel endoscopic scoring system after sinus surgery.

To propose a simple post-operative endoscopic scoring system for use after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), and to demonstrate the usefulness of this approach. Subjects comprised 116 patients (84 men, 32 women; mean age, 54 years) with CRS who were analyzed endoscopically and radiologically after ESS between 2006 and 2012. The study was designed as a case series with planned data collection in the setting of university medical centers. Patients were followed-up for ≥ 6 months after ESS (mean, 13.1 months). Both pre- and post-operative computed tomography (CT) findings of each sinus and olfactory cleft (OC) were scored according to the Lund-Mackay scoring system: 0, normal; 1, partially; or 2, completely occupied. CT score represents the total score expressed as a percentage of the maximum possible score (12 points per side). Post-operative endoscopic score (E score, %) was calculated as the maximum score according to physical findings on each operated sinus and OC: 0, normal; 1, partially diseased; or 2, completely closed. Post-operative course using E score was verified by comparison with the Lund-Kennedy (L-K) scoring system. E score was easily and quickly determined. Interclass correlation coefficient among 10 otolaryngologists indicated high-level inter-rater reliability (0.922). E score correlated strongly with both CT score (n=116, p<0.0001, rs=0.755) and L-K score (n=79, p<0.0001, rs=0.723). Endoscopic evaluation using E score for sinuses and OCs after ESS is a useful method, together with L-K score for the nasal cavity and radiological study.

Aspirin sensitivity does not compromise quality‐of‐life outcomes in patients with samter's triad

To demonstrate that quality-of-life outcomes after endoscopic sinus surgery are not compromised in patients with Samter's triad (asthma, nasal polyps, aspirin sensitivity) when compared to patients with eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (eCRSwP) who are not aspirin sensitive. Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Thirty-two patients with Samter's triad were identified from a prospectively collected patient database from 2003 to 2012. Preoperative and postoperative symptom and endoscopy scores were compared to those of 37 consecutive patients with eCRSwP who were not aspirin sensitive (control). Student t test and Fisher exact test were used to examine for differences between the two groups. Symptom scores were assessed using the 20-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20). Endoscopy findings were scored according to the Lund-Kennedy methodology. Samter's triad patients had significantly worse disease preoperatively when compared to the control group: SNOT-20 (31.1 vs. 22.1, P = .004), endoscopy score (10.9 vs. 7.6, P = .0005), and Lund-Mackay computed tomography score (18.9 vs. 13.9, P = .0001). Although postoperative endoscopy scores remained worse in the Samter's triad group, postoperative SNOT-20 scores were comparable to those of the control group at ≥ 3 years follow-up (22.8 vs. 17.3, P = .43). Although Samter's triad patients present with more severe disease and are more likely to undergo revision surgery, they have postoperative quality-of-life outcomes that are comparable to patients with eCRSwP who are not aspirin sensitive. This is the first study to utilize a disease-specific, validated outcomes instrument in comparing Samter's triad patients with aspirin-tolerant patients who have nasal polyposis and tissue eosinophilia.