This article critically examines legislative procedure in the Singapore Parliament. It explains how procedure can provide the time, information, and opportunities for effective legislative scrutiny by Parliament. It then considers in detail the different stages of law making which Parliament is or should be involved in—the passage of Government Bills, pre- and post-legislative scrutiny, subsidiary legislation scrutiny, and private members’ Bills. In areas where Parliament is not currently involved, the case is made for Parliamentary involvement and mechanisms are proposed to facilitate this. In areas where Parliament is involved, the article considers whether the existing procedure is fit for purpose and proposes reforms where there are deficiencies. Where appropriate, the analysis will draw on the law and practice of other Westminster legislatures. The reforms proposed include extended timelines for scrutinizing Bills, the provision of key information on both proposed and enacted legislation, the creation of portfolio committees for pre- and post-legislative scrutiny, the creation of statutory mechanisms for Parliament to intervene in subsidiary legislation, and the strengthening of the opportunities for private members’ Bills. These proposals are formulated with practical feasibility very much in mind and demonstrate that Parliament’s effectiveness can be enhanced without fundamental constitutional change.