post-ERCP Pancreatitis Research Articles

Comparative study between biliary covered self-expandable metal stent and conventional endoscopic bile drainage treatment in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related Stapfer type II retroperitoneal perforations.

Perforation is one of the most serious complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Conventional nonsurgical endoscopic treatments including intravenous antibiotic administration and plastic endoscopic biliary drainage are generally approved for the treatment of ERCP-related Stapfer type II perforation (perivaterian type). Biliary covered metal stent placement has recently been reported to have favorable outcomes in ERCP-related Stapfer type II perforations. We aimed to compare the outcomes of conventional endoscopic bile drainage and biliary covered self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) insertion in patients with Stapfer type II perforation. Medical records of patients who underwent ERCP at Kyungpook National University Hospital in Daegu from 2011 to 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 8,402 ERCP procedures were performed in our hospital. Sixty-six ERCP-related perforations (0.78%) were identified. Among them, 37 patients (56.1%) who had Stapfer type II perforations were enrolled. Thirteen and twenty-four patients received biliary covered SEMS insertion and conventional endoscopic bile drainage treatments, respectively. No significant differences were observed in the clinical success rate (92.3% vs. 91.7%, p = 1.000), hospital stay (9.46 ± 5.97 vs. 13.9 ± 13.2 days, p = 0.258), and post-ERCP-related fasting time (5.4 ± 3.4 vs 4.3 ± 3.0 days, p = 0.305). Complications including bleeding, post-ERCP pancreatitis, fever, and death were not significantly different between the two groups. The conventional endoscopic bile drainage group took less time for ERCP than the SEMS group (11.5 ± 5.2 vs. 18.5 ± 11.2 min, p = 0.013). Compared with the conventional endoscopic bile drainage treatment method, biliary covered SEMS did not improve patient outcomes in ERCP-related Stapfer type II perforations.

Efficacy of Endoscopic Therapy in Symptomatic Pancreatic Divisum: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Pancreas divisum (PD) is a congenital malformation of the pancreas and is implicated as a cause of pancreatitis. The role of endotherapy has been variable in symptomatic PD indicated by recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP), chronic pancreatitis (CP), or chronic pancreatic-type abdominal pain (PP). The aim of this study was to analyze the pooled data to determine the success of endoscopic intervention for pancreas divisum. We conducted a comprehensive search of several databases (inception to July 2023) to identify studies reporting on the use of endoscopic therapy in symptomatic pancreatic divisum. The random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled rates and I2% values were used to assess the heterogeneity. A total of 27 studies were retrieved that reported endoscopic intervention in pancreatic divisum. The calculated pooled rate of technical success was 92% (95% CI: 87-95; I2=63%). The calculated pooled rate of clinical success was 65% (95% CI: 60-70; I2=60%). The rate of clinical success by PD subtypes was highest in RAP at 71% (95% CI: 65-76; I2=24%). Available studies had significant heterogeneity in defining clinical success. The rate of adverse events was 71% (95% CI: 65-76; I2=24%). The role of endoscopic therapy in pancreatic divisum is variable with the highest success rate in recurrent acute pancreatitis. Endoscopic intervention is associated with a higher-than-usual rate of adverse events, including post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Initial experience with duodenoscopes with single-use end caps in pediatric ERCP: infection prevention comes at a cost

Background and AimsDuodenoscopes with single-use end caps were introduced to minimize infection risk, but are unstudied in pediatrics. MethodsWe collected clinical data and endoscopists’ evaluations of duodenoscopes with single-use end caps versus reusable duodenoscopes over 18 months. ResultsA total of 106 ERCPs were performed for patients aged 1-18 (mean 14.2) years. Forty-six involved single-use end caps, with 9 requiring crossover to reusable duodenoscopes. ERCPs involving single-use end caps resulted in more instances of mucosal trauma (10 vs 0, p<0.05) and post-ERCP pancreatitis (4 vs 1, p<0.05), and accounted for 8 of 9 ERCPs requiring advanced cannulation techniques. No post-ERCP infections occurred. Reported challenges included single-use end cap stiffness and difficulty with their alignment for cannulation. ConclusionsWe report difficulty with advancement, greater reliance on advanced cannulation techniques, and higher rates of PEP when using duodenoscopes with single-use end caps in pediatric ERCP. This area warrants further study.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs before endoscopic ultrasound guided tissue acquisition to reduce the incidence of post procedural pancreatitis.

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with fine needle aspiration or fine needle biopsy is the gold standard for sampling tissue to diagnose pancreatic cancer and autoimmune pancreatitis or to analyze cyst fluid. The most common reported adverse event of fine needle aspiration and/or fine needle biopsy is acute pancreatitis, which is likely induced by the same pathophysiological mechanisms as after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). According to the current European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are administered prior to ERCP as a scientifically proven treatment to reduce post-ERCP pancreatitis incidence rate. A single suppository of diclofenac or indomethacin prior to EUS guided tissue acquisition (TA) is harmless in healthy adults. Since it is associated with low costs and, most important, may prevent a dreadsome complication, we strongly recommend the administration of 100 mg diclofenac rectally prior to EUS-TA. We will explain this recommendation in more detail in this review as well as the risk and pathophysiology of post-EUS TA pancreatitis.

Noninvasive rapid urinary trypsinogen-2 dipstick test for early exclusion of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis within hours after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: Clinical diagnosis and considerations.

Few reports have explored the application of urinary trypsinogen-2 measurement in the early diagnosis of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis, and none have demonstrated the benefits of noninvasive testing. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical application of the rapid urinary trypsinogen-2 dipstick test (Nipro, Japan) compared with serum amylase and lipase levels for the early diagnosis of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). A total of 100 consecutive patients (54 men and 46 women) who were admitted and underwent ERCP at Tokyo Medical University Hospital from August 2021 to December 2021 were recruited. All patients underwent rapid urinary trypsinogen-2 measurement using the dipstick test before and after ERCP. Measurements were taken 24 h before ERCP for pre-ERCP and 1-4 h after ERCP for post-ERCP. Additionally, serum amylase and lipase levels were measured at 8:00 a.m. of the day after ERCP (at least 8 h after ERCP), and their diagnostic abilities for PEP were compared and evaluated. PEP occurred in 5/100 patients (5%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the dipstick test for diagnosing PEP were 100%, 83.2%, 23.8%, and 100%, respectively. These results were comparable to the diagnostic performance of serum amylase and lipase levels at 8:00 a.m. on the day after ERCP (at least 8 h after ERCP). However, false positives must be considered. The dipstick test may be useful in clinical practice as a noninvasive screening test for the early prediction of PEP.

Prognostic Factors for Severe-to-Fatal Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.

The prognostic factors associated with severe-to-fatal post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) remain unclear despite the extensive number of studies on PEP. In total, 3739 ERCP patients with biliary disease with an intact papilla and indicated for ERCP were prospectively enrolled at 36 centers from April 2017 to March 2018. Those with acute pancreatitis diagnosed before ERCP, altered gastrointestinal anatomy, and an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status > 4 were excluded. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed on patient-related factors, operator-related factors, procedure-related factors, and preventive measures to identify potential prognostic factors for severe-to-fatal PEP. Multivariate analyses revealed pancreatic guidewire-assisted biliary cannulation (OR 13.59, 95% CI 4.21-43.83, p < 0.001), post-ERCP non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) administration (OR 11.54, 95% CI 3.83-34.81, p < 0.001), and previous pancreatitis (OR 6.94, 95% CI 1.45-33.33, p = 0.015) as significant risk factors for severe-to-fatal PEP. Preventive measures included endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy (EST; OR 0.29, 95% CI, 0.11-0.79, p = 0.015) and prophylactic pancreatic stents (PPSs; OR 0.11, 95% CI, 0.01-0.87, p = 0.036). In biliary ERCP, pancreatic guidewire-assisted biliary cannulation, NSAID administration after ERCP, and previous pancreatitis were risk factors for severe-to-fatal PEP, whereas EST and PPS were significant preventive measures for severe-to-fatal PEP.

Intravenous Hemin, a potential heme oxygenase-1 activator, does not protect from post-ERCP acute pancreatitis in humans: Results of a randomized multicentric multinational placebo-controlled trial

ObjectiveHemin, a heme oxygenase 1 activator has shown efficacy in the prevention and treatment of acute pancreatitis in mouse models. We conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess the protective effect of Hemin administration to prevent post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) in patients at risk. MethodsIn this multicenter, multinational, placebo-controlled, double-blind RCT, we assigned patients at risk for PEP to receive a single intravenous dose of Hemin (4 mg/kg) or placebo immediately after ERCP. Patients were considered to be at risk on the basis of validated patient- and/or procedure-related risk factors. Neither rectal NSAIDs nor pancreatic stent insertion were allowed in randomized patients. The primary outcome was the incidence of PEP. Secondary outcomes included lipase elevation, mortality, safety, and length of stay. ResultsA total of 282 of the 294 randomized patients had complete follow-up. Groups were similar in terms of clinical, laboratory, and technical risk factors for PEP. PEP occurred in 16 of 142 patients (11.3%) in the Hemin group and in 20 of 140 patients (14.3%) in the placebo group (p = 0.48). Incidence of severe PEP reached 0.7% and 4.3% in the Hemin and placebo groups, respectively (p = 0.07). Significant lipase elevation after ERCP did not differ between groups. Length of hospital stay, mortality and severe adverse events rates were similar between groups. ConclusionWe failed to detect large improvements in PEP rate among participants at risk for PEP who received IV hemin immediately after the procedure compared to placebo. Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01855841).

A88 ADVERSE EVENTS ASSOCIATED WITH ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Abstract Background Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a widely utilized procedure for diagnosing and managing various biliary and pancreatic disorders. Despite its established effectiveness, ERCP is associated with a total adverse event (AE) rate exceeding 10%. However, existing literature lacks a comprehensive synthesis of incidence rates pertaining to specific or overall AEs following ERCP procedures. Aims We performed separate systematic reviews and meta-analyses of (1) data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and (2) data from observational studies to evaluate the incidence of AEs following ERCPs in adult patients. Methods Two separate systematic literature searches were conducted to identify ERCP AE rates in RCTs and observational studies published between 2000 and 2021, inclusive. Abstracts underwent independent assessment to identify studies for full-text review and subsequent data extraction. DerSimonian and Laird random effects meta-analyses were applied to determine pooled incidence rates of individual post-ERCP AEs, accompanied by 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and Risk of Bias 2 (ROB2) tool were used for quality assessment of observational studies and RCTs respectively. Results Our analysis incorporated 242 RCTs and 143 observational studies. Among RCTs, the pooled incidences of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) in patients with native and non-native papillae were 6.9% (CI 6.2% to 7.6%) and 6.1% (CI 5.3% to 7.1%), respectively. In observational studies, the pooled PEP incidences were 5.0% (CI 4.0% to 6.1%) for patients with native papillae and 4.2% (CI 3.6% to 4.8%) for patients with non-native papillae. The incidences of bleeding for patients with native papillae were 1.6% (CI 1.3% to 2.0%) and 2.2% (CI 1.2% to 3.9%) in RCTs and observational studies, respectively. The incidences of perforation for patients with native papillae were 0.3% (CI 0.2% to 0.4%) in RCTs and 0.5% (CI 0.3% to 0.7%) in observational studies. The incidence of cholangitis was 1.4% (CI 1.1% to 1.9%) in RCTs and 1.1% (CI 0.7% to 1.7%) in observational studies. Conclusions This meta-analysis offers comprehensive insights into the incidence of ERCP-associated AEs from 2000 to 2021, both in idealized study settings where procedures are performed by experts, and in ‘real world’ settings. More precise estimates of ERCP-related AEs can help facilitate patient consent, manage appropriate patient expectations, and enhance peri-procedural care. Funding Agencies None

Effect of CoQ10 Addition to Rectal Indomethacin on Clinical Pancreatitis and Related Biomarkers in Post-endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

Background: Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) is the most prevalent complication of ERCP. Oxidative stress has been mentioned as a cause of PEP. Objectives: As preclinical and clinical studies have shown that CoQ10 has anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects, the present study was designed to examine whether oral CoQ10 addition to rectal indomethacin decreases the rate/severity of PEP. Methods: A prospective double-blind clinical study was done on 347 patients undergoing ERCP. All participants received 100 mg rectal indomethacin just before ERCP. Also, patients were asked to consume CoQ10 (200 mg) or an identical placebo for 1 h before the procedure. The occurrence and severity of PEP were determined in the participants. The levels of amylase, lipase, and malondialdehyde (MDA) were also measured 12 h after ERCP. Results: The total rate of PEP was equal to 12.1% in intention-to-treat (ITT) and 13% in per-protocol (PP) analyses. A meaningful difference was observed in the rate and severity of PEP between the CoQ10 and placebo arms (9.8% vs 14.4% in ITT and 10.2% vs 15.1% in PP, sequentially). Secondary levels of amylase, lipase, and MDA were lower in the CoQ10 arm than in the placebo arm (P = 0.032, 0.022, and 0.036, sequentially). Conclusions: A combination of oral CoQ (200 mg) plus rectal indomethacin (100 mg) could decrease the PEP rate and severity meaningfully compared to the use of indomethacin alone.

A Novel Serum Exosomal miRNA Signature in the Early Prediction of Persistent Organ Failure in Patients with Acute Pancreatitis.

Current study aims to investigate whether serum exosomal microRNAs (miRNAs) could be potential biomarkers in predicting APs with POF at early phase. Novel biomarkers are sorely needed for early prediction of persistent organ failure (POF) in acute pancreatitis (AP) patients. In the discovery stage, exosomal miRNAs were profiled in sera from APs with or without POF (5 vs. 5) using microarrays. POF-associated miRNA signatures then were assessed in training cohort (n=227) and further validated in three independent cohorts (n=516), including one nested case-control cohort. A total of 743 APs were recruited in this large-scale biomarker identification study with a nested case-control study. Data from the discovery cohort demonstrated that 90 exosomal miRNAs were significantly dysregulated in APs with POF compared with controls. One miRNA classifier (Cmi) comprising 3 miRNAs (miR-4265, 1208, 3127-5p) was identified in the training cohort, and was further evaluated in two validation cohorts for their predictive value for POF. AUCs for Cmi ranged from 0.88 to 0.90, which was statistically superior to AUCs of APACHE-II and BISAP, and outperformed BUN and creatinine in POF prediction across all cohorts (P<.05). Higher levels of Cmi indicated increased need for ICU admission, prolonged hospitalization, and elevated mortality rate, thus poor prognosis. In the nested case-control study, Cmi could help identify prediagnostic POF in post-ERCP pancreatitis cases within "golden hours" after ERCP with high efficacy. Serum exosomal Cmi may be an early predictor for POF in AP, even within "golden hours" after AP onset. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02602808).

Post-ERCP Pancreatitis Risk Factors: Is Post-Sphincterotomy Bleeding Another Risk Factor?

Despite advancements in technology and expertise, ERCP carries risks of significant complications, such as pancreatitis, bleeding, and perforation. Post-ERCP pancreatitis is the most common and important complication following ERCP. In our study, we aimed to examine the relationship between patient and procedure-related parameters and the development of pancreatitis. Four hundred patients who underwent ERCP between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2020, at the General Surgery Clinic of the Bakirköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Health Application and Research Center of the University of Health Sciences Faculty of Medicine were retrospectively evaluated. Patient and procedure-related factors were analyzed statistically through univariate and multivariate analyses. Age, urgent indication, ERCP history, cholangitis, precut sphincterotomy, common bile duct diameter, pancreatic cannulation, pancreatic stent, and bleeding were statistically significant risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis (+). In multivariate analysis, the effects of urgent indication, ERCP history, cholangitis, precut sphincterotomy, common bile duct diameter, and pancreatic cannulation on post-ERCP pancreatitis were statistically significant risk factors ( P <0.05). This study demonstrates that emergency indication, ERCP history, cholangitis, precut sphincterotomy, and pancreatic cannulation are significant risk factors for the development of post- ERCP pancreatitis. One notable contribution of our study to the existing literature is the unique analysis of post-sphincterotomy bleeding as an independent factor.

Validity of Predictive Markers for Post ERCP Pancreatitis Patients: A Single Centre Study

Abstract: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a proprietary procedure, endoscopic modality, and specialized procedure used to diagnose and treat disorders of the pancreatic and biliary systems. The incidence of reported post-ERCP complications varied among several studies including post ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), duodenal perforation, and cholangitis. In this study, the author would like to show certain intra procedural factors related to PEP incidence. This was a retrospective study of secondary data of patients undergoing ERCP procedures from 2017-2022 at Prof. Dr. R. D. Kandou Hospital, Manado. Length of procedure, cannulation on pancreatic duct, pancreatogram, double wire technique, and the use of certain common bile duct (CBD) stone retrieval techniques such as endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation (EPBD) were recorded and analyzed. The results showed that based on the analyzed data, the percentage of pancreas cannulation was 8%, pancreatogram 5%, double-wire technique 3%, and EPBD procedure 10%, Incidence rate of PEP in all ERCP procedures was 19%. Increased amylase/lipase enzymes were found in 13 of 24 patients (54%) who underwent cannulation; 8 of 16 patients (50%) who underwent pancreatogram; 4 of 9 patients (44%) who underwent double wire procedure; and 10 of 30 patients (33%) who underwent EPBD. This PEP could be caused by several risk factors during ERCP including cannulation, pancreatogram, double wire, and EPBD. Number of cannulation attempt could result in trauma to the ampulla. Pancreatogram could result in hydrostatic, chemical, and allergic injury. Any manipulation of the pancreas that caused trauma could trigger the incidence of PEP. Assessment of the occurrence of PEP was based on increases in lipase and amylase enzyme values by four times the normal value and tested 6 hours after procedure. We could reduce the incidence of PEP by providing prophylactic therapy before ERCP. In conclusion, PEP is the most common complication in ERCP procedures and can be risky in patients with high risk factors. In this study, factors that affecting the incidence of PEP are cannulation, pancreatogram, double wire and EPBD. Keywords: endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; pancreatitis; complications

Double-guidewire technique for selective biliary cannulation does not increase the rate of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in patients with naïve papilla.

This study aimed to compare the safety of the double-guidewire technique (DGT) with that of the conventional single-guidewire technique (SGT) in real-world situations. A total of 240 patients with naïve papilla who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) at Daegu Catholic University Medical Center between January 2021 and December 2021 were included. The primary outcome was the rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) in the SGT and DGT groups. A total of 163 patients (67.9%) belonged to the SGT group, and 77 (32.1%) belonged to the DGT group. The rates of successful biliary cannulation were 95.7% and 83.1% in the SGT and DGT groups, respectively (p=0.002). In the study group, PEP occurred in 14 patients (5.8%). The PEP rates were not significantly different between the SGT and DGT groups (4.3% vs. 9.1%, p=0.150). In the multivariate analysis, the age of <50 years (odds ratio [OR], 9.305; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.367-63.358; p=0.023) and hyperlipidemia (OR, 7.384; 95% CI, 1.103-49.424; p=0.039) were significant risk factors for PEP in the DGT group. DGT did not increase the PEP rate in patients with naïve papilla. In addition, the age of <50years and hyperlipidemia were significant risk factors for PEP in the DGT group.

Endoscopic main duct stenting in refractory postoperative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy – a friend or a foe?

BackgroundClinically relevant (CR) postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after distal pancreatectomy (DP) are common. Endoscopic treatment (ET) has only scarcely been explored. The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for CR POPF after DP and the efficacy of ET in adjunct to standard therapy.MethodsConsecutive patients without previous pancreatic surgery who underwent DP between 2011 and 2020 were evaluated, analyzing risk factors for CR POPF. The choice and performance of ET, main pancreatic duct (MPD) stenting, was not standardized. Healing time and complications after ET were registered.Results406 patients underwent DP, CR POPF occurred in 29.6%. ET was performed in 17 patients 27 days (median) after index surgery. Risk for CR POPF was increased in ASA-PS 1–2 patients, MPD ≤ 3 mm, procedure time ≥ 3 h, and CRP ≥ 180 on postoperative day 3. POPF resolved with standard treatment after 32 days and 59 days in the ET group (p < 0.001). There was one mortality in the ET-group (not procedure related). Mild post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred in three patients.ConclusionsCR POPF is common after DP. Long operating time, a narrow MPD, low ASA score, and high postoperative CRP were risk factors for CR POPF. ET was not beneficial but proper evaluation was not possible due to few patients and non-standardized treatment. Complications after ET appeared mild.

Risk Factors for Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography Pancreatitis in Children With Chronic Pancreatitis and Its Prediction Using 4-Hour Postprocedure Serum Amylase and Lipase Levels.

Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) is seen in 3% to 16% of children undergoing therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP). We evaluated the risk factors of PEP and utility of 4-hour post-ERCP amylase and lipase for early prediction of PEP in children with chronic pancreatitis (CP). Thirty children with CP (boys 20, 14.3 [interquartile range, 9.3-16] years) who underwent 62 ERCP procedures were studied. Clinical and procedural details with outcome were noted. Serum amylase and lipase were measured before, 4 hours, and 24 hours after ERCP. Multivariate analysis was done to identify risk factors for PEP. Cutoff scores of 4-hour amylase and lipase were identified. PEP occurred in 14.5% (9/62) of ERCP procedures (mild, 8; moderate, 1) with no mortality. On univariate analysis, endoscopic sphincterotomy ( P = 0.04), difficult cannulation ( P = 0.004), and prior PEP ( P = 0.036) were risk factors, while prior ERCP ( P = 0.04) was protective. Difficult cannulation (odds ratio, 5.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.329-25.592) was the independent risk factor on multivariate analysis overall and for first ERCP session alone. Amylase >3.3 times upper limit of normal (ULN) and lipase of >5 times ULN at 4 hours had best sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of PEP. All cases with PEP were symptomatic by 6 hours and none had amylase/lipase <3 ULN at 4 hours. Amylase/lipase of <3 ULN at 4 hours could exclude PEP with good sensitivity (100%) and specificity (76% and 81%, respectively). PEP occurred in 14.5% of procedures in children with CP, with difficult cannulation being the independent risk factor. Asymptomatic patients with 4-hour amylase/lipase <3 times ULN can be safely discharged.

Indomethacin with or without prophylactic pancreatic stent placement to prevent pancreatitis after ERCP: a randomised non-inferiority trial

The combination of rectally administered indomethacin and placement of a prophylactic pancreatic stent is recommended to prevent pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in high-risk patients. Preliminary evidence suggests that the use of indomethacin might eliminate or substantially reduce the need for stent placement, a technically complex, costly, and potentially harmful intervention. In this randomised, non-inferiority trial conducted at 20 referral centres in the USA and Canada, patients (aged ≥18 years) at high risk for post-ERCP pancreatitis were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive rectal indomethacin alone or the combination of indomethacin plus a prophylactic pancreatic stent. Patients, treating clinicians, and outcomes assessors were masked to study group assignment. The primary outcome was post-ERCP pancreatitis. To declare non-inferiority, the upper bound of the two-sided 95% CI for the difference in post-ERCP pancreatitis (indomethacin alone minus indomethacin plus stent) would have to be less than 5% (non-inferiority margin) in both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02476279), and is complete. Between Sept 17, 2015, and Jan 25, 2023, a total of 1950 patients were randomly assigned. Post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred in 145 (14·9%) of 975 patients in the indomethacin alone group and in 110 (11·3%) of 975 in the indomethacin plus stent group (risk difference 3·6%; 95% CI 0·6-6·6; p=0·18 for non-inferiority). A post-hoc intention-to-treat analysis of the risk difference between groups showed that indomethacin alone was inferior to the combination of indomethacin plus prophylactic stent (p=0·011). The relative benefit of stent placement was generally consistent across study subgroups but appeared more prominent among patients at highest risk for pancreatitis. Safety outcomes (serious adverse events, intensive care unit admission, and hospital length of stay) did not differ between groups. For preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis in high-risk patients, a strategy of indomethacin alone was not as effective as a strategy of indomethacin plus prophylactic pancreatic stent placement. These results support prophylactic pancreatic stent placement in addition to rectal indomethacin administration in high-risk patients, in accordance with clinical practice guidelines. US National Institutes of Health.

Optimal dilation duration of 10 mm diameter balloons after limited endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones: a randomized controlled trial

Limited endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) combined with endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) is widely used. However, the optimal duration of small balloon dilation in choledocholithiasis remains controversial. We aimed to determine the optimal duration for 10 mm diameter balloon dilation after limited EST in choledocholithiasis. In this randomized controlled clinical trial, 320 patients were randomly assigned to receive small balloon dilation (10 mm in diameter) for 1 min (n = 160) or 3 min (n = 160) after deep bile duct cannulation. No significant difference in success rate of stone extraction between the two groups was observed. The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) was higher in the 1 min group (10.6%) than in the 3 min group (4.4%) (P = 0.034). The logistic regression analysis showed that guidewire into the pancreatic duct, cannulation time > 5 min and 1 min balloon dilation were independent risk factors for PEP. There were no significant differences in other post-ERCP adverse events such as acute cholangitis, bleeding, perforation, etc. between the two groups. In conclusion, 3 min in duration was determined to be the optimal dilation condition for the removal of common bile duct stones.

Cytokine signatures in post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a pilot study

Cytokine signatures in post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a pilot study

Weekend endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography has similar outcomes as weekday procedures-a propensity score match analysis of the Hungarian ERCP Registry.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is essential for the minimally invasive management of biliary and pancreatic disorders. Under certain indications, performing ERCP without delay during the weekend can be important for improving outcomes. To compare the outcomes of ERCP performed on weekends and holidays with those of regular weekday ERCPs. Propensity score match analysis of the data from the Hungarian ERCP Registry. A total of 116 ERCPs were performed during weekends or holidays, and 3144 during weekday working hours. The analyses were performed on 1:2 propensity-matched groups (116 weekend and 232 weekday cases). Weekend ERCPs were mostly performed for acute cholangitis and acute biliary pancreatitis (70% of cases), whereas in the weekday group, only 32% of cases were performed for these indications. No significant difference was found between weekday and weekend ERCPs in terms of the rates of successful (91.38% vs 93.1%, p = 0.565) and difficult (33.62% vs 36.64%, p = 0.511) biliary cannulations. We found no significant differences in the number of adverse events (bleeding, post-ERCP pancreatitis, and 30-day mortality) in ERCPs performed during weekends or weekdays. Moreover, no significant differences in the aforementioned outcomes were detected between the propensity-matched groups. In this propensity-matched study, no significant differences were found in the outcomes of weekend and weekday ERCPs.

The impact of periampullary diverticula on cannulation and adverse events in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Periampullary diverticulum (PAD) is commonly encountered in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures. We sought to determine whether PADs are associated with a lower success rate of cannulation and an increased risk of adverse events. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using prospectively gathered nationwide registry data. Using the Swedish registry for gallstone surgery and ERCP, we analyzed a cohort of 66,974 prospectively registered ERCP procedures performed in 2006-2021. The presence of PAD was divided into two groups based on the PAD type: Boix type 1 (the papilla located inside the PAD) and Boix types 2-3 (the papilla located either at the edge of the PAD or immediately adjacent to the PAD). The primary outcomes were the success rate of cannulation and overall adverse events within 30 days. PADs were registered in 8130 (12.1%) of ERCPs included in the study population. In total, 2114 (3.9%) patients had Boix type 1 PAD, while 5035 (8.2%) patients had Boix type 2 or 3 PAD. The chance of successful cannulation was lower in patients with type 1 PAD compared to no PAD (80.1% vs 88.7%; odds ratio: 0.42, 95% confidence interval: 0.38-0.46). No differences were seen in overall adverse events or post-ERCP pancreatitis. Adverse events occurred in 14.6% of patients with PAD type 1 and 16.0% of patients with PAD type 2 or 3, compared to 16.5% of patients without a PAD. Cannulation appears less successful during ERCP when the papilla is located in the PAD (i.e., type 1). Adverse events seem not to increase with the presence of a PAD, but they could theoretically be influenced by the inability to cannulate.