post-CRT Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Research Articles

Apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis for predicting neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy response in patients with rectal cancer.

PURPOSE This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histograms in predicting chemoradiotherapy (CRT) response in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). METHODS A total of 51 patients who underwent surgery in our institution for rectal cancer following neoadjuvant CRT between November 2013 and July 2019 were enrolled. Conventional magnetic resonance (MR) and diffusion-weighted images obtained before and after CRT were evaluated retrospectively. All tumor-containing regions of interests were drawn in 3 selected axial images, and special software for histogram analysis was used to evaluate ADC distribution. ADC cutoff values from post-CRT ADC histogram were calculated from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for evaluating CRT response. RESULTS In histopathological analysis, 5 patients (9.8%) had minimal response (group 1), 31 patients (60.8%) had partial response (group 2), and 15 patients (29.4%) had complete or almost complete response (group 3). In the ADC histogram, minimum, maximum, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th percentile, mean ADC values, and skewness values of groups 2 and 3 showed significant changes before and after CRT, but no difference was found within group 1 values. The mean, 25th, 50th, 75th percent ADC values after CRT and skewness, and kurtosis values were significantly different between group 1 and group 3. Skewness value from the ADC histogram in postCRT magnetic resonance imaging had the best diagnostic performance with an area under the ROC curve of 0.851 (P =.003) for detecting group 3. The skewness cutoff calculated from the ROC analysis was 0.210 for evaluating CRT response. The sensitivity and specificity of the cut-off value were 100% and 61.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION The ADC histogram analysis seems to have potential application in predicting response to neoadjuvant CRT in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

The role of readout-segmented echo-planar imaging-based diffusion-weighted imaging in evaluating tumor response of locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Accurate assessment of tumor response in rectal cancer could help individualize treatment. To evaluate the role of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) based on readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (rs-EPI) in assessing tumor response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Sixty-three patients with LARC who received neoadjuvant CRT and surgery were enrolled retrospectively. They all underwent pre- and post-CRT magnetic resonance examinations, including DWI using rs-EPI. According to pathological results, patients were grouped as pathological complete responder (pCR, n = 16) and non-pCR (n = 47). Visual assessment of residual tumor and whole-tumor histogram analysis of pre- and post-CRT apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map was performed by two radiologists; tumor volume on ADC map was also recorded. Overall inter-observer agreement was good for histogram analysis (ICC = 0.543-0.999). Tumor volume reduction rate on ADC map showed no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.468). Post-CRT mean, quantile values, and their percentage changes were higher in the pCR group (all P < 0.001). Post-CRT mean value had a good diagnostic power in selecting pCR (AUC = 0.855), with a cut-off value of 1.345 × 10-3 mm2/s, yielding a sensitivity of 83%, specificity of 81.3%. Post-CRT 95% quantile value had the highest AUC (AUC = 0.868) among quantile values, and a higher specificity (87.5% vs. 81.3%) than mean value with comparable overall diagnostic performance (P = 0.563). Visual assessment showed a sensitivity of 85.1%, specificity of 68.8% in selecting pCR. Quantitative ADC value of rs-EPI DWI could reliably evaluate tumor response in patients with LARC. Post-CRT 95% quantile ADC value could help mean value to more accurately identify pCR.

Value of High-Resolution DWI in Combination With Texture Analysis for the Evaluation of Tumor Response After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to determine the performance of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value calculated from high-resolution DWI using readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (rs-EPI) and to assess the texture parameters of T2-weighted MR images in identifying pathologic complete response (pCR) after patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) undergo preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 76 patients with LARC who underwent preoperative CRT and subsequent surgery were enrolled in the study retrospectively. All patients underwent post-CRT MRI, which included acquisition of a DWI sequence with use of the rs-EPI technique. The histopathologic tumor regression grade was the reference standard. Patients were subdivided into pCR and non-pCR groups. Two radiologists independently drew whole-tumor ROIs on DW images and T2-weighted MR images to calculate the mean ADC value and first-order texture parameters. RESULTS. Interobserver agreement was good to excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.79-0.993) for imaging analysis. Calculated from high-resolution DWI, the mean post-CRT ADC value was significantly higher in the pCR group (p < 0.001). The pCR group also showed lower uniformity (p < 0.001) of the T2-weighted image. The mean ADC value and uniformity were significantly correlated with the tumor regression grade. The mean ADC value was a good indicator for differentiating pCR from absence of pCR (ROC AUC value, 0.912). Uniformity (ROC AUC value, 0.776) showed a moderate ability to identify pCR. Combining the mean ADC value and uniformity yielded an ROC AUC value comparable to that of the mean ADC value (p = 0.125). CONCLUSION. Mean post-CRT ADC values calculated from high-resolution DWI using rs-EPI could effectively select for patients with LARC who have a pCR after preoperative CRT. First-order texture parameters of T2-weighted MR images could also identify patients with pCR by reflecting tumor heterogeneity, even though they could not significantly improve the diagnostic performance.

Magnetic resonance imaging in locally advanced rectal cancer: quantitative evaluation of the complete response to neoadjuvant therapy.

PurposeTo assess the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for the discrimination of complete responder (CR) from the non-complete responder (n-CR) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) undergoing chemotherapy and radiation (CRT).Material and methodsBetween December 2009 and January 2014, 32 patients (33 lesions: one patient had two synchronous lesions) were enrolled in this retrospective study. All patients underwent a pre- and post-CRT conventional MRI study completed with DWI. For both data sets (T2-weighted and DWI), the pre- and post-CRT tumour volume (VT2; VDWI) and the tumour volume reduction ratio (ΔV%) were determined as well as pre- and post-CRT apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and ADC change (ΔADC%). Histopathological findings were the standard of reference. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to compare performance of T2-weighted and DWI volumetry, as well as ADC.ResultsThe area under the ROC curve (AUC) revealed a good accuracy of pre- and post-CRT values of VT2 (0.86; 0.91) and VDWI (0.82; 1.00) as well as those of ΔVT2% (0.84) and ΔVDWI% (1.00) for the CR assessment, with no statistical difference. The AUC of pre- and post-CRT ADC (0.53; 0.54) and that of ΔADC% (0.58) were significantly lower.ConclusionsBoth post-CRT VDWI and ΔVDWI% (AUC = 1) are very accurate for the assessment of the CR, in spite of no significant differences in comparison to the conventional post-CRT VT2 (AUC = 0.91) and ΔVT2% (AUC = 0.84). On the contrary, both ADC and ΔADC% values are not reliable.

Quantitative Aspects of Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Rectal Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy.

BackgroundThe aim of the study was to evaluate the added value of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) in patients with rectal cancer who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). The use of DW-MRI for response evaluation in rectal cancer still remains a widely investigated issue, as the accurate detection of pathologic complete response (pCR) is critical in making therapeutic decisions.Patients and methodsThirty-three patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were evaluated retrospectively by MRI in addition to diffusion-weighted images (DWI) and its ADC pre- and post-neoadjuvant CRT. These patients subsequently underwent curative-intent surgery. Tumor staging by MRI and ADC value were compared with histopathological findings of the surgical specimen.ResultsMRI in addition to DWI had a sensitivity of 96.1%, specificity of 71.4%, positive predictive value of 92.5%, and negative predictive value of 83.3% in the detection of pCR. The pre-CRT ADC alone could not reliably predict the pCR group. Post-CRT ADC cutoff value of 1.49 x 10−3 mm2/s had the highest accuracy and allowed a 16.7% increase in negative predictive value and 3.9% increase in sensitivity. Patients with pCR to neoadjuvant treatment differed from the other groups in their absolute values of post-CRT ADC (p < 0.01).ConclusionsThe use of post-CRT ADC increased the diagnostic performance of MRI in addition to DWI in predicting the final pathologic staging of rectal carcinoma.

Value of diffusion-weighted MRI and apparent diffusion coefficient measurements for predicting the response of locally advanced rectal cancer to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

The aim of our study was to assess the performance value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the restaging of locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and in the identification of good vs. poor responders to neoadjuvant therapy. A total of 34 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer underwent MRI prior to and after CRT. T stage and tumor regression grade (TRG) on post-CRT MRI was compared with the pathological staging ypT and TRG. Tumor volume and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were measured using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) before and after neoadjuvant CRT; the percentage of tumor volume reduction and the change of ADC (ΔADC) was also calculated. ADC parameters and the percentage of tumor volume reduction were correlated to histopathological results. The diagnostic performance of ADC and volume reduction to assess tumor response was evaluated by calculating the area under the ROC curve and the optimal cut-off values. A significant correlation between the T stage and the TRG defined in DW-MRI after CRT and the ypT and the TRG observed on the surgical specimens was found (p=0.001; p<0.001). The mean post-CRT ADC and ΔADC in responder patients was significantly higher compared to non-responder ones (p=0.001; p=0.01). Furthermore, the mean post-CRT ADC values were significantly higher in tumors with T-downstage (p=0.01). DW-MRI may have a significant role in the restaging and in the evaluation of post-CRT response of locally advanced rectal cancer. Quantitative analysis of DWI through ADC map may result in a promising noninvasive tool to evaluate the response to therapy.

Quantitative Assessment of Rectal Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Combined Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy: Comparison of Three Methods of Positioning Region of Interest for ADC Measurements at Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging.

Purpose To determine the impact of three different methods of region of interest (ROI) positioning for apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements on the assessment of complete response (CR) to neoadjuvant combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy (CRT) in patients with rectal cancer. Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained for this study; all patients gave written informed consent. ADCs were measured by two radiologists using three circular ROIs (three-ROIs), single-section (SS), and whole-tumor volume (WTV) methods in 62 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer on pre- and post-CRT images. Interobserver variability was analyzed by calculating intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Descriptive statistics and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were calculated to evaluate performance in determining CR from pre- and post-CRT ADCs and ADC change. Histopathologic tumor regression grade was the reference standard. Results SS and WTV methods yielded higher AUCs than did the three-ROIs method when determining CR from post-CRT ADC (0.874 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.778, 0.970] and 0.886 [95% CI: 0.781, 0.990] vs 0.731 [95% CI: 0.583, 0.878], respectively; P = .033 and P = .003) and numeric change (0.892 [95% CI: 0.812, 0.972] and 0.897 [95% CI: 0.801, 0.994] vs 0.740 [95% CI: 0.591, 0.890], respectively; P = .048 and P = .0021). Respective accuracies of SS, WTV, and three-ROIs methods were 79% (49 of 62), 77% (48 of 62), and 61% (38 of 62) for post-CRT, 79% (49 of 62), 86% (53 of 62), and 60% (37 of 62) for numeric ADC change, and 77% (48 of 62), 84% (52 of 62), and 57% (35 of 62) for percentage ADC change (ADC cut-offs: 1.21, 1.30, and 1.05 × 10-3 mm2/sec, 0.33, 0.45, and 0.27 × 10-3 mm2/sec increases, and 40%, 54%, and 27% increases, respectively). Post-CRT and ADC change measurements achieved negative predictive values of 96% (44 of 46) to 100% (39 of 39). Intraobserver agreement was highest for WTV-derived ADCs (ICC, 0.742 [95% CI: 0.316, 0.892] to 0.891 [95% CI: 0.615, 0.956]) and higher for all pretreatment than posttreatment measurements (ICC, 0.761 [95% CI: 0.209, 0.930] and 0.648 [95% CI: 0.164, 0.895] for three-ROIs method, 0.608 [95% CI: 0.287, 0.844] and 0.582 [95% CI: 0.176, 0.870] for SS method, 0.891 [95% CI: 0.615, 0.956] and 0.742 for WTV method [95% CI: 0.316, 0.892]). Conclusion Tumor ADCs are highly dependent on the ROI positioning method used. Larger area measurements yield greater accuracy in response assessment. Post-CRT ADCs and values of ADC changes accurately identify noncomplete responders. WTV measurement of percentage ADC change provides the best results. © RSNA, 2016 An earlier incorrect version of this article appeared online. This article was corrected on September 19, 2016.

Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Predicts Pathology Complete Response of Rectal Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the predictive value of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer.MethodsA total of 265 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma, whole Diffusion-Weighted MRI (DWI-MRI) images, clinically stage II to III (cT3-4 and/or cN+) and treated with NCRT followed by TME were screened. Fifty patients with pCR and another 50 patients without pCR with similar clinical charcacters and treatment regimens were selected for statistical analysis. All the patients’ pre-CRT and post-CRT average ADC values were calculated from the coefficient maps created by DWI-MRI and recorded independently. The difference in the ADC values between the pCR and non-pCR was analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U test. The cut-off ADC value of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve with pCR was then established.ResultsThe mean pre- and post-ADC values in all patients, and in pCR patients and non-pCR patients were 0.879±0.06 and 1.383±0.11, 0.859±0.04 and 1.440±0.10, 0.899±0.07 and 1.325±0.09 (×10-3mm2/s), respectively. The difference between the pre- and post-ADC values in all patients, pCR patients, and non-pCR patients were considered to be statistically significant. The pre-ADC value was significantly lower in the pCR patients than in the non-pCR patients (p = 0.003), whereas the post-ADC values were significantly higher in the pCR patients than in the non-pCR patients. The percentage increase of the ADC value (ΔADC%) in the pCR and non-pCR patients were 68% and 48% respectively (p<0.001). The ROC curves of the cut-off value of the pre-CRT patient ADC value was 0.866×10-3mm2/s. The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of diagnosing pCR were 0.670 (95% CI 0.563–0.777), 0.600, 0.640, 60%, 60%, and 60%, respectively. The cut-off value of ΔADC% was 58%. The corresponding AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of diagnosing pCR were 0.856 (95% CI 0.783–0.930), 0.800, 0.760, 76.9%, 79.2%, and 78%, respectively.ConclusionsDWI-MRI technology can be efficient for predicting pCR for LARC after NCRT. Although the mean pre-CRT ADC value and the ΔADC% are moderate predictors for pCR, the latter would be more accurate.

Apparent diffusion coefficient measurement covering complete tumor area better predicts rectal cancer response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

AimTo determine the impact of two apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement techniques on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images (DW MRI) on the assessment of rectal cancer response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT).MethodsADC values were measured prospectively with two different techniques – the first, which measures ADCs in the most cellular tumor parts, and the second, which measures the entire tumor area, in 58 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer on pre-CRT and post-CRT image sets. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) and parameters of diagnostic accuracy were calculated for pre- and post-CRT ADC values and numeric and percent ADC change for each technique to determine their performance in tumor response evaluation using histopathological tumor-regression grade as the reference standard.ResultsThe second technique yielded higher AUCs (0.935 vs 0.704, P < 0.001), percent-change (0.828 vs 0.636, P < 0.001), and numeric-change (0.866 vs 0.653, P < 0.001) than the first technique for post-CRT ADC. Accuracies for post-CRT ADC assessment were 62% for the first and 88% for the second technique (cut-off values: 0.98 and 1.29 × 10−3 mm2/s, respectively) and for ADC change assessment, both numeric and percent, 59% and 74%, respectively (cut-off values: increase of 0.18 and 0.28 × 10−3 mm2/s; increase of 24% and 37%, respectively).ConclusionsThe type of measurement technique significantly affected ADC results. ADC measurements covering a larger area better predicted tumor response to therapy. Post-CRT ADCs, regardless of the measurement technique, and numeric ADC change measured in the whole tumor volume accurately identified non-complete responders. Post-CRT ADCs measured in the entire tumor area yielded the highest accuracy level in tumor response evaluation.

Locally advanced rectal cancer: post-chemoradiotherapy ADC histogram analysis for predicting a complete response.

The value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for reliable differentiation between pathologic complete response (pCR) and residual tumor is still unclear. Recently, a few studies reported that histogram analysis can be helpful to monitor the therapeutic response in various cancer research. To investigate whether post-chemoradiotherapy (CRT) apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram analysis can be helpful to predict a pCR in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Fifty patients who underwent preoperative CRT followed by surgery were enrolled in this retrospective study, non-pCR (n = 41) and pCR (n = 9), respectively. ADC histogram analysis encompassing the whole tumor was performed on two post-CRT ADC600 and ADC1000 (b factors 0, 600 vs. 0, 1000 s/mm(2)) maps. Mean, minimum, maximum, SD, mode, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th percentile ADCs, skewness, and kurtosis were derived. Diagnostic performance for predicting pCR was evaluated and compared. On both maps, 10th and 25th ADCs showed better diagnostic performance than that using mean ADC. Tenth percentile ADCs revealed the best diagnostic performance on both ADC600 (AZ 0.841, sensitivity 100%, specificity 70.7%) and ADC1000 (AZ 0.821, sensitivity 77.8%, specificity 87.8%) maps. In comparison between 10th percentile and mean ADC, the specificity was significantly improved on both ADC600 (70.7% vs. 53.7%; P = 0.031) and ADC1000 (87.8% vs. 73.2%; P = 0.039) maps. Post-CRT ADC histogram analysis is helpful for predicting pCR in LARC, especially, in improving the specificity, compared with mean ADC.

Investigation of Using Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Evaluate the Therapeutic Effect of Esophageal Carcinoma Treatment

Aim: To explore the associations of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) measurements with the therapeutic effect (TE) on and survival of esophageal carcinoma patients treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Methods: From March 2010 to December 2011, 77 patients were prospectively enrolled into a cohort study. DWI was performed at the beginning and 1-3 months after CRT. The immediate post-CRT TE was evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). The associations between the disappearance status of hyperintense expression (HE) in DWI and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of DWI with the complete response (CR) as TE and survival were analyzed. Results: 3 patients were excluded due to the absence of HE in DWI. Analysis of the remaining 74 patients indicated that their ADC values were significantly improved from 1.64 ± 0.48 to 2.65 ± 0.58 mm²/s from pre-CRT to post-CRT (p = 0.000). Both univariate and multivariate Cox model analyses showed that high post-CRT ADC values and the disappearance status of HE associated significantly with the TE (CR rate) and survival. Conclusions: DWI examination could afford useful markers to predict the treatment response as well as the survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The non-disappearance of HE in DWI and low ADC values after CRT were risk factors.

Phase II study of preoperative chemoradiation with S‐1 plus oxaliplatin in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

A phase II study of preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) with S-1 plus oxaliplatin in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer was conducted. The total radiotherapy dose was 50.4 Gy. Chemotherapy consisted of oxaliplatin 50 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 22 and 29 and S-1 80 mg/m(2) per day on days 1-14 and 22-35. The tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was measured using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) before and after CRT. Total mesorectal excision was performed within 6 ± 2 weeks. The primary end-point was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. A total of 38 patients were enrolled. The pCR rate was 22.9% (8/35; 95% CI, 10.9-42.1), and 10 (28.6%) patients showed near-total tumor regression. There was no grade 4 adverse event, and grade 3 adverse events included leukopenia (5.4%), diarrhea (5.4%), anorexia (2.7%) and nausea (2.7%). The tumor ADC was calculated in 38 patients (including those who participated in the phase I study). The post-CRT ADC (P = 0.037) and the percentage change in ADC (P = 0.026) were significantly correlated with pathological response. In conclusion, preoperative CRT with S-1 plus oxaliplatin showed promising results in pathological responses and favorable toxicity profiles.

Locally advanced rectal cancer: Value of ADC mapping in prediction of tumor response to radiochemotherapy

PurposeTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements, in the assessment of the therapeutic response to chemo-radiation therapy (CRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, by analyzing post CRT values of ADC, in relation to tumor regression grade (TRG) obtained by histopathologic evaluation of the rectal specimen. MethodsThis prospective study was approved by an Institutional Review Board, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. Thirty-one patients with locally advanced rectal cancer underwent pre and post CRT MR imaging at 1.5T. ADC values were measured in regions of interest (ROIs) drawn independently by two radiologists, blinded to the pathology results, on three slices of the pre and post CRT DW-MR image sets with the corresponding T2 weighted images (T2WI) available for anatomic reference. The two readers’ measurements were compared for differences in ADC values, inter-observer variability (measured as the intraclass correlation coefficient; ICC) and the ADC distributions of responders vs non-responders. The diagnostic performance of ADC in the prediction of the response to CRT was evaluated by calculating the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and the optimal cut-off values. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were assessed. ResultsThe two readers showed an overall strong agreement in measuring ADC values. For both readers, no differences in ADC pre-treatment measurements were observed between responders and non-responders. For reader 1, the post-CRT ADC and the ΔADC presented the higher AUC (0.823 and 0.803, respectively), while Δ%ADC provided the lower AUC value (0.682). The optimal cutoff point was 1.294s/mm2 for post-CRT measures (sensitivity=86.4%, specificity=66.7%, PPV=86.4%, NPV=66.7%), 0.500 for ΔADC (sensitivity=81.8%, specificity=66.7%, PPV=85.7%, NPV=60.0%) and 59.3% for Δ%ADC (sensitivity=63.4%, specificity=66.7, PPV=82.4%, NPV=42.9%). Similar results were observed for reader 2, with better performance obtained with the ADC post-CRT (AUC of 0.833) and an optimal cut off of 1.277×10−3s/mm2. ConclusionPost-CRT ADC measurements are reliable and reproducible and may be used as a non-invasive tool to evaluate response to therapy as post-CRT ADC values and ΔADC presented good diagnostic performance to select responder patients.

Rectal Cancer: Assessment of Complete Response to Preoperative Combined Radiation Therapy with Chemotherapy—Conventional MR Volumetry versus Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging

To determine diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for assessment of complete tumor response (CR) after combined radiation therapy with chemotherapy (CRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) by means of volumetric signal intensity measurements and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements and to compare the performance of DW imaging with that of T2-weighted MR volumetry. A retrospective analysis of 50 patients with LARC, for whom clinical and imaging data were retrieved from a previous imaging study approved by the local institutional ethical committee and for which all patients provided informed consent, was conducted. Patients underwent pre- and post-CRT standard T2-weighted MR and DW MR. Two independent readers placed free-hand regions of interest (ROIs) in each tumor-containing section on both data sets to determine pre- and post-CRT tumor volumes and tumor volume reduction rates (volume). ROIs were copied to an ADC map to calculate tumor ADCs. Histopathologic findings were the standard of reference. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to compare performance of T2-weighted and DW MR volumetry and ADC. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate interobserver variability and the correlation between T2-weighted and DW MR volumetry. Areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) for identification of a CR that was based on pre-CRT volume, post-CRT volume, and volume, respectively, were 0.57, 0.70, and 0.84 for T2-weighted MR versus 0.63, 0.93, and 0.92 for DW MR volumetry (P = .15, .02, .42). Pre- and post-CRT ADC and ADC AUCs were 0.55, 0.54, and 0.51, respectively. Interobserver agreement was excellent for all pre-CRT measurements (ICC, 0.91-0.96) versus good (ICC, 0.61-0.79) for post-CRT measurements. ICC between T2-weighted and DW MR volumetry was excellent (0.97) for pre-CRT measurements versus fair (0.25) for post-CRT measurements. Post-CRT DW MR volumetry provided high diagnostic performance in assessing CR and was significantly more accurate than T2-weighted MR volumetry. Post-CRT DW MR was equally as accurate as volume measurements of both T2-weighted and DW MR. Pre-CRT volumetry and ADC were not reliable.

Preoperative chemoradiation with S-1 plus oxaliplatin in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: Results of a phase II study and the role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW MRI) for prediction of pathologic responses.

629 Background: We conducted a phase II study of preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) with S-1, a novel oral fluoropyrimidine, plus oxaliplatin in patients (pts) with locally advanced rectal cancer. Tumor ADCs were measured by DW-MRI and were evaluated as a predictive marker for pathologic responses. Methods: Radiotherapy was delivered to a total 50.4 Gy. The recommended doses were determined by a previous phase I study; oxaliplatin 50 mg/m2/week on D1, 8, 22 and 29, and S-1 80 mg/m2/day on D1-14 and D22-35. Total mesorectal excision was performed within 6 ± 2 weeks. Primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. The value of tumor ADCs by DW-MRI was measured before and after CRT, and was correlated with pathologic responses after surgery. Results: A total of 38 patients were enrolled; 22 (57.9%) were men and the median age was 54 years (range, 28-67). Of 35 patients who underwent curative surgery, 28 patients underwent sphincter-saving operations. There was no grade 4 toxicity, and grade 3 toxicities included leukopenia (2.7%), neutropenia (2.7%), anorexia (2.7%), nausea (2.7%) and diarrhea (8.8%). The pCR rate was 25.7% (8/35, 95% CI [10.9-42.1]) and additional 10 patients (28.6%) showed near total regressions of tumor. Tumor ADCs by DW-MRI were calculated in 38 patients (including phase I part). The post-CRT ADC and the ADC changes (ΔADC) were significantly correlated with pCR rate (post-CRT ADC: 1.52±0.46 vs. 1.07±0.58, p=0.037, ΔADC: 44.5% vs. -7.6%, p=0.026). Conclusions: Preoperative CRT with S-1 plus oxaliplatin showed promising results in pathologic responses and favorable toxicities profiles. Tumor ADC by DW-MRI seems to be a useful method for predicting responses. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Apparent diffusion coefficient for evaluating tumour response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer

To determine whether change in the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) would more accurately predict pathological complete response (pCR) than analysing the pre- or post-CRT ADC individually. 76 patients with LARC (≥ T3 or lymph node-positive) underwent pre- and post-CRT, 1.5-T diffusion-weighted imaging. A blinded radiologist measured the tumour ADCs. The three measures were compared with regard to CR and non-CR. To calculate accuracy for determining pCR, receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was applied to the three measures. The post-CRT ADC (1.43 ± 0.10) (× 10(-3) mm(2)/s) and the percentage change (70.0 ± 23.5%) in the CR (n = 11) were significantly higher than those in the non-CR (n = 65) (1.14 ± 0.18, 30.2 ± 21.7%, respectively)(both, P < 0.0001). The pre-CRT ADC (0.85 ± 0.10) of the pCR did not differ significantly from that of the non-pCR (0.88 ± 0.14)(P = 0.4094). The post-CRT ADC showed comparable relative accuracy for determining pCR to that of the percentage change (P = 0.788). However, overall accuracy of the former (87%) was higher than that of the latter (75%) (P = 0.049). Analyzing post-CRT ADC alone can reliably differentiate pCR from non-pCR in LARC.