Post-acute Care Research Articles

Hypnotic drug use and rehabilitation outcomes in post-acute geriatric hip fracture patients: A retrospective study

IntroductionThe use of hypnotic drugs is common in the elderly and is associated with negative health outcomes. Our aim was to evaluate the prevalence of hypnotic drug usage amongst hip fracture patients undergoing a rehabilitation program and investigate any potential associations between hypnotic drug use and rehabilitation outcomes in a post-acute care setting. MethodsA retrospective analysis of 440 geriatric hip fracture patients was conducted from 1/1/2019 to 12/2021 in a geriatric rehabilitation center. The main outcome measures were the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), the motor FIM effectiveness and length of stay (LOS). ResultsTwo hundred and twenty-eight (51.7 %) patients out of the entire cohort (440)), were prescribed hypnotic drugs. These patients exhibited a significantly lower rate of diabetes (p = 0.025), a higher rate of depression (p = 0.003), and lower albumin levels (p = 0.023) upon admission to rehabilitation in comparison to untreated patients. No significant differences were observed between the two patient groups in functional rehabilitation outcomes or LOS. Moreover, no correlation was established between the hypnotic drug burden during rehabilitation and the outcome measures. Furthermore, no significant differences were found between patients treated with hypnotic drugs on admission and those who were prescribed these drugs during rehabilitation. The type of hypnotic drug did not affect these results. ConclusionThe use of hypnotic drugs by elderly individuals undergoing a rehabilitation program after a hip fracture is unlikely to have an adverse impact on their short-term rehabilitation outcomes. Consequently, there may not be an immediate necessity to discontinue these drugs upon admission. Nevertheless, the use of hypnotic drugs should be approached with caution and minimized whenever possible due to an increased fall risk and other adverse effects.

Effects on the Physical Functioning of Two Exercise Interventions in Patients with Multiple Myeloma: A Pilot Feasibility Study.

Because of the high prevalence of bone destruction in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), physical exercise is oftentimes discouraged by healthcare providers. The goal of this prospective trial was to investigate the feasibility of two six-month exercise interventions in patients with MM (N = 42): a remotely prompted home-based walking intervention or a supervised strength training intervention. Physical function and pain were assessed with the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) Basic Mobility Short Form raw score, a six-minute walk test (6 MWT), a 30-second sit-to-stand test (30 SST), a timed up-and-go (TUG) test, a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, handheld dynamometer tests, heart rate at rest, blood oxygen saturation at rest, and body mass index. No intervention-related serious adverse events were observed. Adverse events mostly affected the musculoskeletal system. In the resistance training group (n = 24), patients showed significant improvements in AM-PAC, TUG, 6 MWT, and 30 SST, with all effects but the 6 MWT sustained six months after the intervention. The walking group (n = 18) saw improvements in the AM-PAC, TUG, 6 MWT, and 30 SST, with a sustained change in the AM-PAC and TUG. This trial shows the feasibility of both exercise interventions with a sustained beneficial effect on the physical functioning of a six-month strength training intervention and, to a lesser extent, a six-month unsupervised walking intervention. A larger study building on these findings is currently underway.

Improving Patient Outcomes Using Measures to Increase Discharge Rates to Home.

Background Post-acute care (PAC) centers are facilities used for recuperation, rehabilitation, and symptom management in an effort to improve the long-term outcomes of patients. PAC centers include skilled nursing facilities, inpatient rehabilitation facilities, and long-term care hospitals. In the 1990s, Medicare payment reforms significantly increased the discharge rates to PAC centers and subsequently increased the length of stay (LOS) amongthese patient populations. Over the last several years, there have been national initiatives and multidisciplinary approaches to improve safe discharge rates to home. Multiple studies have shown that patients who are discharged to home have decreased rates of 30-day readmissions, reduced short-term mortality, and an improvement in their activities of daily living. Objectives This study aimed to investigate how multidisciplinary approaches could improve a single institution's discharge rates to home. In doing so, we aim to lower hospital readmission rates, hospital length of stay, morbidity and mortality rates, and healthcare-associated costs. Methods A retrospective single-institution cohort study was implemented at Jersey Shore University Medical Center (JSUMC). Data from January 2015 to December 2019 served as the control period, compared to the intervention period from January 2020 to January 2024. Patients were either admitted to JSUMC teaching faculty, hospitalists, or "others," which is composed of various medical and surgical subspecialists. Interventions performed to improve home discharge rates can be categorized into the following: physician education, patient education, electronic medical record (EMR) initiatives, accountability, and daily mobility initiatives. All interventions were performed equally across the three patient populations. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients discharged to home. Results There were 190,699 patients, divided into a pre-intervention group comprising 98,885 individuals and a post-intervention group comprising 91,814 patients. Within the pre-intervention group, the faculty attended to 8,495 patients, hospitalists cared for 39,145 patients, and others managed 51,245 patients. In the post-intervention period, the faculty oversaw 8,014 patients, hospitalists attended to 35,094 patients, and others were responsible for 48,706 patients. After implementing a series of multidisciplinary interventions, there was a significant increase in the proportion of patients discharged home, rising from 74.9% to 80.2% across the entire patient population. Specifically, patients under the care of the faculty experienced a more substantial improvement, with a discharge rate increasing from 73.6% to 84.4%. Similarly, the hospitalists exhibited a rise from 69.4% to 74.3%, and the others demonstrated an increase from 79.3% to 83.7%. All observed changes yielded a p-value < 0.001. Conclusions By deploying a multifaceted strategy that emphasized physician education, patient education, EMR initiatives, accountability measures, and daily mobility, there was a statistically significant increase in the rate of patient discharges to home. These initiatives proved to be cost-effective and led to a tangible reduction in healthcare-associated costsand patient length of stay. Further studies are required to look into the effect on hospital readmission rates and morbidity and mortality rates. The comprehensive approach showcased its potential to optimize patient outcomes.

“Thank You for Being a Friend” in Post-Acute and Long-Term Care

“Thank You for Being a Friend” in Post-Acute and Long-Term Care

Recommendations for Next Steps in Our Understanding of Use of Antipsychotics Among Older People in the Post-Acute Long-Term Care Environments: Article 3 of 3.

This article is the third installment of a multi-part series on the history and usage of antipsychotics in older people living in nursing and assisted living facilities. This article presents next steps and recommendations for appropriate usage of antipsychotics in the older population based on the lead author's early drafts, submitted to the editors prior to his untimely death, of this series and on his consultations with the coauthors. Dr Levenson emphasized in his focus on next steps related to antipsychotic use: that all providers should review the history of antipsychotic use and recognize clinically legitimate alternative explanations for the findings. His conclusions were that "off label" usage should not be a reason to exclude the appropriate use of antipsychotics. His overall recommendations to clinicians are to assess and diagnose the underlying cause of the problem, understand the treatment options and select the best one to address the clinical problem and/or the symptom if the problem cannot be fully resolved, and to focus on all medications, not just antipsychotics, in a patient's regimen to aid in a comprehensive understanding of the assessment and inform therapeutic recommendations.

Leadership in Action: AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine Elects New Board Members

Leadership in Action: AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine Elects New Board Members

Hip Fracture Treatment and Outcomes Among Community-Dwelling People Living With Dementia

The decision for surgical vs nonsurgical treatment for hip fracture can be complicated among community-dwelling people living with dementia. To compare outcomes of community-dwelling people living with dementia treated surgically and nonsurgically for hip fracture. This retrospective cross-sectional study undertook a population-based analysis of national Medicare fee-for-service data. Participants included community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries with dementia and an inpatient claim for hip fracture from January 1, 2017, to June 30, 2018. Analyses were conducted from November 10, 2022, to October 17, 2023. Surgical vs nonsurgical treatment for hip fracture. The primary outcome was mortality within 30, 90, and 180 days. Secondary outcomes consisted of selected post-acute care services. Of 56 209 patients identified with hip fracture (73.0% women; mean [SD] age, 86.4 [7.0] years), 33 142 (59.0%) were treated surgically and 23 067 (41.0%) were treated nonsurgically. Among patients treated surgically, 73.3% had a fracture of the femoral head and neck and 40.2% had moderate to severe dementia (MSD). Among patients with MSD and femoral head and neck fracture, 180-day mortality was 31.8% (surgical treatment) vs 45.7% (nonsurgical treatment). For patients with MSD treated surgically vs nonsurgically, the unadjusted odds ratio (OR) of 180-day mortality was 0.56 (95% CI, 0.49-0.62; P < .001) and the adjusted OR was 0.59 (95% CI, 0.53-0.66; P < .001). Among patients with mild dementia and femoral head and neck fracture, 180-day mortality was 26.5% (surgical treatment) vs 34.9% (nonsurgical treatment). For patients with mild dementia who were treated surgically vs nonsurgically for femoral head and neck fracture, the unadjusted OR of 180-day mortality was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.60-0.76; P < .001) and the adjusted OR was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.63-0.79; P < .001). For patients with femoral head and neck fracture, there was no difference in admission to a nursing home within 180 days when treated surgically vs nonsurgically. In this cohort study of community-dwelling patients with dementia and fracture of the femoral head and neck, patients with MSD and mild dementia treated surgically experienced lower odds of death compared with patients treated nonsurgically. Although avoiding nursing home admission is important to persons living with dementia, being treated surgically for hip fracture did not necessarily confer a benefit in that regard. These data can help inform discussions around values and goals with patients and caregivers when determining the optimal treatment approach.

Interdisciplinary videoconference model for identifying potential adverse transition of care events following hospital discharge to postacute care

Discharge from hospitals to postacute care settings is a vulnerable time for many older adults, when they may be at increased risk for errors occurring in their care. We developed...

Barriers and enablers of post-COVID-19 acute care follow-up in Nigeria from service providers' perspective: a nominal group technique.

Despite modest efforts to study and document the complications that arise after acute treatment of patients with coronavirus disease, its ramifications and regional variations are yet to be clearly understood. Progress in sub-Saharan Africa, notably Nigeria, has been impeded by patient disengagement from care and insufficient or non-existent follow-up arrangements. The aim of this study was to describe the barriers and enablers for follow-up services after discharge from COVID-19 care pathway in Nigeria. Seventeen experts involved directly in the care of patients with COVID-19 participated in brainstorming using the nominal group technique during a national workshop to review the new guidelines for COVID-19 case management in Nigeria. Participants discussed the barriers and facilitators of post-acute care follow-up of patients discharged from COVID-19 pathway and ranked their recommendations to arrive at three major factors per question. Participants were mostly middle aged and predominantly clinicians. The top three barriers were patients' perception of their symptom severity, lack of organizational clarity/structure/policies on follow-up care after discharge, and financial constraints. Similarly, participants identified providers' initiated education on the reasons for follow-up at discharge, written organizational policies/structure and clarity and free follow-up services as the top three facilitators. This study has enumerated barriers to follow-up care after discharge patients with coronavirus disease and highlighted providers, institutional and governmental responses that will facilitator follow-up care after discharge of patients with COVID-19. The implication is that, there is need for clear institutional guidelines for tracking and documenting post-COVID condition. In the future, it would be necessary to assess the achievements and shortcomings of post-COVID condition tracking in Nigeria through the use of implementation science outcomes.

Preferences for Postacute Care at Home vs Facilities

Two in 5 US hospital stays result in rehabilitative postacute care, typically through skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) or home health agencies (HHAs). However, a lack of clear guidelines and understanding of patient and caregiver preferences make it challenging to promote high-value patient-centered care. To assess preferences and willingness to pay for facility-based vs home-based postacute care among patients and caregivers, considering demographic variations. In September 2022, a nationally representative survey was conducted with participants 45 years or older. Using a discrete choice experiment, participants acting as patients or caregivers chose between facility-based and home-based postacute care that best met their preferences, needs, and family conditions. Survey weights were applied to generate nationally representative estimates. Preferences and willingness to pay for various attributes of postacute care settings were assessed, examining variation based on demographic factors, socioeconomic status, job security, and previous care experiences. A total of 2077 adults were invited to participate in the survey; 1555 (74.9%) completed the survey. In the weighted sample, 52.9% of participants were women, 6.5% were Asian or Pacific Islander, 1.7% were American Indian or Alaska Native, 11.2% were Black or African American, 78.4% were White; the mean (SD) age was 62.6 (9.6) years; and there was a survey completion rate of 74.9%. Patients and caregivers showed a substantial willingness to pay for home-based and high-quality care. Patients and caregivers were willing to pay an additional $58.08 per day (95% CI, 45.32-70.83) and $45.54 per day (95% CI, 31.09-59.99) for HHA care compared with a shared SNF room, respectively. However, increased demands on caregiver time within an HHA scenario and socioeconomic challenges, such as insecure employment, shifted caregivers' preferences toward facility-based care. There was a strong aversion to below average quality. To avoid below average SNF care, patients and caregivers were willing to pay $75.21 per day (95% CI, 61.68-88.75) and $79.10 per day (95% CI, 63.29-94.91) compared with average-quality care, respectively. Additionally, prior awareness and experience with postacute care was associated with willingness to pay for home-based care. No differences in preferences among patients and caregivers based on race, educational background, urban or rural residence, general health status, or housing type were observed. The findings of this survey study underscore a prevailing preference for home-based postacute care, aligning with current policy trends. However, attention is warranted for disadvantaged groups who are potentially overlooked during the shift toward home-based care, particularly those facing caregiver constraints and socioeconomic hardships. Ensuring equitable support and improved quality measure tools are crucial for promoting patient-centric postacute care, with emphasis on addressing the needs of marginalized groups.

Body Mass Index, Sex, and Age Are Predictors of Discharge to a Post-acute Care Facility Following Total Ankle Arthroplasty.

The utilization of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) continues to increase. Discharge to a post-acute care (PAC) facility can increase patient morbidity and postoperative costs. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of age and body mass index (BMI) on discharge to a PAC facility and hospital length of stay (LOS) following TAA. A retrospective review of patients who underwent TAA from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was performed. Using overweight patients as the reference BMI group, sex- and age-adjusted log-binomial regression models were utilized to estimate risk ratios of BMI categories for being discharged to a PAC facility. A linear regression was utilized to estimate the effect of BMI category on hospital LOS. Obese patients had 1.36 times the risk of overweight patients (P = .040), and morbidly obese patients had 2 times risk of overweight patients (P = .001) of being discharged to a PAC facility after TAA. Men had 0.48 times the risk of women (P < .001). Compared with patients aged 18 to 44 years, patients aged ≥65 years had 4.13 times the risk (P = .012) of being discharged to a PAC facility after TAA. Relative to overweight patients, on average there was no difference in hospital LOS for underweight patients, but healthy weight patients stayed an additional 0.30 days (P=.003), obese patients stayed an additional 0.18 days (P = .011), and morbidly obese patients stayed an additional 0.33 days (P = .009). Men stayed 0.29 fewer hospital days than women (P < .001) on average. Women and patients who are obese or morbidly obese have a longer hospital LOS and an increased chance of being discharged to a PAC facility. Increasing age is also associated with an increased risk of being discharged to a PAC. These may be important factors when developing and discussing the postoperative plan with patients prior to TAA. Level III.

Perspectives on supporting Veterans’ social needs during hospital to home health transitions: findings from the Transitions Nurse Program

BackgroundVeterans who need post-acute home health care (HHC) are at risk for adverse outcomes and unmet social needs. Veterans’ social needs could be identified and met by community-based HHC clinicians due to their unique perspective from the home environment, acuity of Veterans they serve, and access to Veterans receiving community care. To understand these needs, we explored clinician, Veteran, and care partner perspectives to understand Veterans’ social needs during the transition from hospital to home with skilled HHC.MethodsQualitative data were collected through individual interviews with Veterans Health Administration (VHA) inpatient & community HHC clinicians, Veterans, and care partners who have significant roles facilitating Veterans’ hospital to home with HHC transition. To inform implementation of a care coordination quality improvement intervention, participants were asked about VHA and HHC care coordination and Veterans’ social needs during these transitions. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed inductively using thematic analysis and results were organized deductively according to relevant transitional care domains (Discharge Planning, Transition to Home, and HHC Delivery).ResultsWe conducted 35 interviews at 4 VHA Medical Centers located in Western, Midwestern, and Southern U.S. regions during March 2021 through July 2022. We organized results by the three care transition domains and related themes by VHA, HHC, or Veteran/care partner perspective. Our themes included (1) how social needs affected access to HHC, (2) the need for social needs screening during hospitalization, (3) delays in HHC for Veterans discharged from community hospitals, and (4) a need for closed-loop communication between VHA and HHC to report social needs.ConclusionsHHC is an underexplored space for Veterans social needs detection. While this research is preliminary, we recommend two steps forward from this work: (1) develop closed-loop communication and education pathways with HHC and (2) develop a partnership to integrate a social risk screener into HHC pathways.

Medicare's Post-Acute Care Reimbursement Models as of 2023: Past, Present, and Future.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services is continually working to mitigate unnecessary expenditures, particularly in post-acute care (PAC). Medicare reimburses for orthopaedic surgeon services in varied models, including fee-for-service, bundled payments, and merit-based incentive payment systems. The goal of these models is to improve the quality of care, reduce health-care costs, and encourage providers to adopt innovative and efficient health-care practices.This article delves into the implications of each payment model for the field of orthopaedic surgery, highlighting their unique features, incentives, and potential impact in the PAC setting. By considering the historical, current, and future Medicare reimbursement models, we hope to provide an understanding of the optimal payment model based on the specific needs of patients and providers in the PAC setting.

101 The Burden of Burns: An Analysis of Public Health Measures

Abstract Introduction Accurate analysis of injuries and illnesses is paramount when allocating resources for education, prevention, recovery, and research. Inconsistencies in public health reports and increased lobbying/marketing by medical nonprofits has obscured the perception of burn injury (BI) leading to inequities in healthcare access and funding of reconstruction and research. A primary example of these developments is the frequently referenced and inaccurate BI statistics. Our study aims to compare national references reporting the incidence of BI and the related sequela in the U.S. Methods The American Burn Association Burn (ABA) Injury Summary Report (BISR), ABA Fact Sheet, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting (WISQARS) database, the CDC National Center for Health Statistics’ National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), and the commercially available claims databases were queried for 2020 burn admissions and emergency department (ED) visits. Non-U.S. reports, claims, or analyses were excluded from our review. The costs of BI were reported in U.S. dollars where available. Claims analyses were conducted using ICD-10 BI codes coupled with burn DRG for admission, and CPT for surgical intervention from a commercially available database incorporating managed care, Medicare, and Medicaid payors. Results The ABA Fact Sheet reported 486,000 BI annually. The 2021 ABA BISR data represented burn admissions at approximately 100 burn centers (BC) excluding non-BC, ED, and BC not participating in BCQP. CDC’s WISQARS database reported 3,529 burn-related deaths resulting in 45,135 years of potential years of life lost, 287,926 non-fatal BI from fire/flame and contact with 76.1% of patients treated in ED only and total costs of $42.4B. Mechanisms such as scald, chemical, electrical, radiation, and inhalation injury were not included. The CDC NHAMCS reported 359,000 BI presenting to ED (23% increase from CDC WISQARS). Our analysis from claims databases demonstrated over 698,555 BI as the primary code likely underreporting self-pay/uninsured, military facilities, and endowment or community-based hospitals not submitting claims data. Conclusions Our study demonstrates a large variability in the incidence of BI. Given the increased population noted in the U.S. 2020 census, the true number of BI is likely closer to the claims database suggesting a substantial misunderstanding in the burden of burns. We additionally noted no ICD-10 codes to characterize the sequela of BI limiting our assessment of post-acute burn care challenges. Future efforts to improve CDC reporting policies and new ICD-10 codes capturing BI sequela are essential to improve advocacy and understanding of our patients and their healthcare needs. Applicability of Research to Practice This abstract will help clinicians, patients, and investigators better advocate for population health research in burn injury.

Identifying Sources of Inter-hospital Variation in Episode Spending for Sepsis Care.

To evaluate inter-hospital variation in 90-day total episode spending for sepsis, estimate the relative contributions of each component of spending, and identify drivers of spending across the distribution of episode spending on sepsis care. Medicare fee-for-service claims for beneficiaries (n=324,694) discharged from acute care hospitals for sepsis, defined by MS-DRG, between October 2014 and September 2018. Multiple linear regression with hospital-level fixed effects was used to identify average hospital differences in 90-day episode spending. Separate multiple linear regression and quantile regression models were used to evaluate drivers of spending across the episode spending distribution. The mean total episode spending among hospitals in the most expensive quartile was $30,500 compared with $23,150 for the least expensive hospitals (P<0.001). Postacute care spending among the most expensive hospitals was almost double that of least expensive hospitals ($7,045 vs. $3,742), accounting for 51% of the total difference in episode spending between the most expensive and least expensive hospitals. Female patients, patients with more comorbidities, urban hospitals, and BPCI-A-participating hospitals were associated with significantly increased episode spending, with the effect increasing at the right tail of the spending distribution. Inter-hospital variation in 90-day episode spending on sepsis care is driven primarily by differences in post-acute care spending.

Claims-Based vs Agency-Reported Patient Outcomes Among Home Health Agencies, 2013-2019

Given the growth of home health agency (HHA) care, it is important to understand whether quality reporting programs, such as star ratings, are associated with improved patient outcomes. To assess the immediate and long-term association of the introduction of HHA star ratings with patient-level quality outcomes, comparing claims-based and agency-reported measures. This cross-sectional study used Medicare HHA claims and agency-reported assessments to identify sequential patient episodes (ie, spells) among US adults with traditional Medicare who received HHA care (2013-2019). An interrupted time series (ITS) model was used to measure changes in trends and levels before and after the introduction of star ratings. Statistical analysis was performed from November 2022 to September 2023. The exposure was the introduction of HHA star ratings. The postexposure period was set as starting January 1, 2016, to account for the period when both star ratings (quality of patient care and patient satisfaction rating) were publicly reported. The main outcomes included claims-based hospitalization measures (both during the patient spell and 30 days after HHA discharge) and agency-reported functional measures, such as improvement in ambulation, bathing, and bed transferring. There was also a measure to capture timely initiation of care among post-acute care HHA users, defined as HHA care initiated within 2 days of inpatient discharge. This study identified 22 958 847 patient spells to compare annual changes over time; 9 750 689 patient spells were included during the pre-star ratings period from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2015 (6 067 113 [62.2%] female; 1 100 145 [11.3%] Black, 512 487 [5.3%] Hispanic, 7 845 197 [80.5%] White; 2 656 124 [27.2%] dual eligible; mean [SD] patient spell duration, 70.9 [124.9] days; mean [SD] age, 77.4 [12.0] years); 13 208 158 patient spells were included during the post-star ratings period from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019 (8 104 69 [61.4%] female; 1 385 180 [10.5%] Black, 675 536 [5.1%] Hispanic, 10 664 239 [80.7%] White; 3 318 113 [25.1%] dual eligible; mean [SD] patient spell duration, 65.3 [96.2] days; mean [SD] age, 77.7 [11.6] years). Results from the ITS models found that the introduction of star ratings was associated with an acceleration in the mean [SE] hospitalization rate during the spell (0.39% [0.05%] per year) alongside functional improvements in ambulation (2.40% [0.29%] per year), bed transferring (3.95% [0.48%] per year) and bathing (2.34% [0.19%] per year) (P < .001). This occurred alongside a 1.21% (0.12%) per year reduction in timely initiation of care (P < .001). This cross-sectional study found an observed improvement in agency-reported functional measures, which contrasted with slower increases in more objective measures such as hospitalization rates and declines in timely initiation of care. These findings suggest a complex picture of HHA quality of care after the introduction of star ratings.

Does post acute care reduce the mortality of octogenarian and nonagenarian patients undergoing hip fracture surgery?

With the increasing number of elderly individuals worldwide, a greater number of people aged 80years and older sustain fragility fracture due to osteopenia and osteoporosis. This retrospective study included 158 older adults, with a median age of 85 (range: 80-99) years, who sustained hip fragility fracture and who underwent surgery. The patients were divided into two groups, one including patients who joined the post-acute care (PAC) program after surgery and another comprising patients who did not. The mortality, complication, comorbidity, re-fracture, secondary fracture, and readmission rates and functional status (based on the Barthel index score, numerical rating scale score, and Harris Hip Scale score) between the two groups were compared. The patients who presented with fragility hip fracture and who joined the PAC rehabilitation program after the surgery had a lower rate of mortality, readmission rate, fracture (re-fracture and secondary fracture), and complications associated with fragility fracture, such as urinary tract infection, cerebrovascular accident, and pneumonia (acute coronary syndrome, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, or in-hospital cardiac arrest. PAC is associated with a lower rate of mortality and complications such as urinary tract infection, bed sore, and pneumonia in octogenarian and nonagenarian patients with hip fragility fracture.

Transition of care from post-acute services for the older adults in Quebec: a pilot impact evaluation

BackgroundEarly discharge of frail older adults from post-acute care service may result in individuals’ reduced functional ability to carry out activities of daily living, and social, emotional, and psychological distress. To address these shortcomings, the Montreal West Island Integrated University Health and Social Services Centre in Quebec, Canada piloted a post-acute home physiotherapy program (PAHP) to facilitate the transition of older adults from the hospital to their home. This study aimed to evaluate: (1) the implementation fidelity of the PAHP program; (2) its impact on the functional independence, physical and mental health outcomes and quality of life of older adults who underwent this program (3) its potential adverse events, and (4) to identify the physical, psychological, and mental health care needs of older adults following their discharge at home.MethodsA quasi-experimental uncontrolled design with repeated measures was conducted between April 1st, 2021 and December 31st, 2021. Implementation fidelity was assessed using three process indicators: delay between referral to and receipt of the PAHP program, frequency of PAHP interventions per week and program duration in weeks. A battery of functional outcome measures, including the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global-10 scale, as well as fall incidence, emergency visits, and hospitalizations were used to assess program impact and adverse events. The Patient’s Global Impression of Change (PGICS) was used to determine changes in participants’ perceptions of their level of improvement/deterioration. In addition, the Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly (CANE) questionnaire was administered to determine the met and unmet needs of older adults.ResultsTwenty-four individuals (aged 60.8 to 94 years) participated in the PAHP program. Implementation fidelity was low in regards with delay between referral and receipt of the program, intensity of interventions, and total program duration. Repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant improvement in FIM scores between admission and discharge from the PAHP program and between admission and the 3-month follow-up. Participants also reported meaningful improvements in PGICS scores. However, no significant differences were observed on the physical or mental health T-scores of the PROMIS Global-10 scale, in adverse events related to the PAHP program, or in the overall unmet needs.ConclusionFindings from an initial sample undergoing a PAHP program suggest that despite a low implementation fidelity of the program, functional independence outcomes and patients’ global impression of change have improved. Results will help develop a stakeholder-driven action plan to improve this program. A future study with a larger sample size is currently being planned to evaluate the overall impact of this program.Clinical trial registrationRetrospectively registered NCT05915156 (22/06/2023).

Association between days for concussion recovery and initial specialty clinic evaluation within 48 hours

BackgroundResearchers have highlighted the importance of early access to concussion care within one week of injury in reducing recovery times. However, a persisting question for concussion researchers is “just how early is important?” The purpose of this study was to examine differences in recovery time as predicted by the number of days elapsed since injury (DSI) to initial evaluation among patients who had access to a specialty concussion clinic within seven days. We hypothesized that DSI group membership, even within seven days, would significantly predict risk of protracted recovery (i.e., beyond 21 days).MethodsIn this archival study, retrospective data were gathered from electronic medical records between September 2020 to March 2022. Records of participants between ages 12–18, those diagnosed with a sports-related concussion based on initial clinic visit diagnosis by a medical provider and those who established care within seven days of injury at a large pediatric specialty concussion clinic were examined. Participants were divided into three DSI groups (patients seen in < 48 h: “acute”, patients seen between 49 h < and < 96 h: “sub-acute”, and patients seen between 97 < and < 168 h: “post-acute”). A general linear model was constructed to examine relationships between relevant concussion factors (e.g., Post Concussion Scale Score, neurodevelopmental history, psychiatric history, concussion history, migraine history, overall VOMS change score, cognitive testing, sex, age, race, and ethnicity) that were either significant in the preliminary analysis or in clinical judgement and recovery time. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) were derived from a binary logistic regression model, in which recovery time was normal (≤ 21 recovery days) or protracted (> 21 recovery days).ResultsA total of 856 participants were eligible. Adolescents in the acute group (M = 15.12, SD = 8.04) had shorter recovery times in days compared to those in the sub-acute (M = 17.98, SD = 10.18) and post-acute (M = 21.12, SD = 10.12; F = 26.00, p < .001) groups. Further, participants in the acute (OR = 4.16) and sub-acute (OR = 1.37) groups who accessed specialty concussion clinics within 48 h were 4 times more likely to have a normal recovery and recovered approximately 6 days faster than the post-acute care group.ConclusionsEarlier concussion care access predicted recovery times and was associated with lower risk for protracted recovery.

‘Sit down and thrash it out’: opportunities for expanding ethics consultation during conflict resolution in long-term care

Objective: To identify the frequency and nature of care conflict dilemmas that United States long-term care providers encounter, response strategies, and use of ethics resources to assist with dispute resolution. Design: An online cross-sectional survey was distributed to the Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine (AMDA). Results: Two-thirds of participants, primarily medical directors, have rejected surrogate instructions and 71% have managed family conflict. Conflict over treatment decisions and issues interpreting advance directives were frequently reported. Half of facilities lack a formal dispute mediation policy. Only five respondents have called an ethics consult for assistance. Conclusion: Ethically tense care conflicts commonly arise in long-term and post-acute care facilities. Few facility procedures incorporate ethics resources into actual practice. Recommendations are made to create actionable policy, increase access to ethics services, and support staff skill development in order to improve the end-of-life care experiences for patients, families, and care facility staff.