Positive Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Research Articles

Lymphadenectomy After Melanoma-A National Analysis of Recurrence Rates and Risk of Lymphedema.

Treatment for melanoma after a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy includes nodal observation or lymphadenectomy. Important considerations for management, however, involve balancing the risk of recurrence and the risk of lymphedema after lymphadenectomy. From the Merative MarketScan Research Databases, adult patients were queried from 2007 to 2021. International Classification of Disease, Ninth (ICD-9) and Tenth (ICD-10) Editions, diagnosis codes and Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify patients with melanoma diagnoses who underwent an index melanoma excision with a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Main outcomes were completion lymph node dissection (CLND) utilization after a positive SLNB, developing lymphedema with or without CLND, and nodal basin recurrence 3 months or more after index excision. Subanalyses stratified by index excision year (2007-2017 and 2018-2021) and propensity score matched were additionally conducted. Demographics and comorbidities (measured by Elixhauser index) were recorded. A total of 153,085,453 patients were identified. Of those, 359,298 had a diagnosis of melanoma, and 202,456 patients underwent an excision procedure. The study cohort comprised 3717 patients with a melanoma diagnosis who underwent an excision procedure and had a positive SLNB. The mean age of the study cohort was 49 years, 57% were male, 41% were geographically located in the South, and 24% had an Elixhauser index of 4+. Among the 350 patients who did not undergo CLND, 10% experienced recurrence and 22% developed lymphedema. A total of 3367 patients underwent CLND, of which 8% experienced recurrence and 20% developed lymphedema. Completion lymph node dissection did not significantly affect risk of recurrence [odds ratio (OR), 1.370, P = 0.090] or lymphedema (OR, 1.114, P = 0.438). After stratification and propensity score matching, odds of experiencing lymphedema (OR, 1.604, P = 0.058) and recurrence (OR, 1.825, P = 0.058) after CLND were not significantly affected. Rates of CLND had significantly decreased (P < 0.001) overtime, without change in recurrence rate (P = 0.063). Electing for nodal observation does not increase the risk of recurrence or reduce risk of lymphedema. Just as CLND does not confer survival benefit, its decreased utilization has not increased recurrence rate.

The Role of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in the Management of Merkel Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare cutaneous malignancy with high metastatic potential. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is used to assess locoregional spread, facilitate staging, and inform prognosis. Positive nodal status is associated with higher recurrence rates and reduced overall survival. A systematic search was conducted. Eligible articles included patients diagnosed with MCC, who would be candidates for or who had SLNB. The Covidence tool was used for screening and data extraction, including additional treatments, disease-free survival, overall survival, and recurrence. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottowa Scale criteria. SLNB was associated with increased likelihood of completion lymphadenectomy (223 versus 41), regional radiotherapy (2167 versus 808), and systemic chemotherapy (138 versus 31). Overall survival for patients undergoing SLNB was 81% at 2 years, 75% at 3 years, and 72% at 5 years (odds ratio: 0.79). Hazard ratio for positive SLNB versus negative was 3.36 (P < 0.001). Five-year disease recurrence was 23.3% in patients undergoing SLNB. Lymph node metastases are associated with reduced overall survival and increased recurrence of MCC. Determining nodal status early can inform prognosis, facilitate staging, and determine need for adjuvant treatment. Adjuvant treatments are associated with reduced mortality and improved overall survival; SLNB is an important influencer of their use. Early prophylactic intervention should be considered in MCC in both positive and negative nodal status to improve overall outcomes. Widespread use of SLNB will allow more accurate assessment of the role of nodal status on adjuvant treatment and long-term outcomes.

De-escalating axillary management after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: The ratio of positive sentinel lymph nodes matters

BackgroundDe-escalation of axillary surgery in breast cancer (BC) patients diminishes sequelae without compromising cancer outcomes. Surgical management of the axilla is challenging after neoadjuvant treatment. We aimed to identify the factors associated with residual axillary disease amenable to lymphadenectomy in patients with positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). MethodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study in Hospital 12 de Octubre (Spain). We included BC patients with positive SLNB who underwent axillary dissection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were performed to identify independent predictors of residual axillary disease. We estimated the ratio of positive nodes in SLNB and assessed the diagnostic validity of this ratio in relation to residual axillary disease. ResultsWe included 103 patients in the study. Residual axillary disease was identified in 54 patients (52.4%). Clinically node positive status at diagnosis (OR = 18.3, 95%CI: 4.0–83.6) and a ratio of positive nodes in SLNB ≥0.5 (OR = 6.5, 95%CI 41.7–23.7) were associated with residual axillary disease. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of a ratio of positive nodes in SLNB ≥0.5 were 87% (95%CI 75.1%–94.6%) and 75% (95%CI 55.1%–89.3%), respectively. ConclusionsIn our study, for patients with positive SLNB after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, stage N+ at diagnosis and a ratio of positive nodes in SLNB ≥0.5 were independent risk factors of positive residual axillary disease. This ratio is a feasible measure with a good diagnostic validity for residual axillary disease and could be used as a guiding factor in the surgical management of these patients.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma in the older population: A prospective analysis of outcomes.

The use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in the older population, defined as those over 70 years old, has been debated since the adoption of SLNBinto routine practice. Interestingly, there remains a paucity of evidence, especially regarding the rates of SLNB positivity, complications, and subsequent adjuvant therapy in those with node positivity. Data on patient's comorbidities, positivity rates, complication rates, and subsequent adjuvant treatments were collected prospectively from 998 patients (644 patients < 70 and 354 patients ≥ 70 years old) between 2016 and 2022. Patients aged ≥ 70 were found to have a higher prevalence of comorbidities, including hypertension, diabetes and hyperlipidaemia. The mean Breslow thickness was 2.2 and 2.5 in the under and over 70 groups respectively (p = 0.03). The mean mitotic rate was found to be 3.3 in the under 70 s and 4.1 in the over 70 s (p = 0.02). Despite these results, no significant differences were observed in the positivity rates of sentinel lymph node biopsies or in the treatment options selected for positive results. The under 70 s were more likely to experience loss of sensation (p < 0.01), but no difference was found in the total number of complications between the two groups. Although patients aged 70 and above had a greater incidence of comorbidities, the study revealed that they had lower complications rates and there was no significant variation in the SLNB positivity rate or chosen treatment options between the two age groups. This study supports the move to physiological rather than chronological age assessments in SLNB of the elderly.

Complete lymph node dissection in cutaneous melanoma patients with positive sentinel lymph node: Outcome and predictors in a retrospective cohort study over 16 years

BackgroundIn melanoma treatment, complete lymph node dissection (CLND) has been considered the therapeutic gold standard in patients with positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). This long-held approach was revised in 2017, with recent evidence questioning the therapeutic benefit of CLND in malignant melanoma (MM) therapy. In this study, we aimed to fill this knowledge gap by retrospectively analyzing the impact of CLND on MM patients’ survival. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the multi-center population-based Clinical Cancer Registry at the Tumor Center Regensburg (TUDOK) database (2004–2020) to identify patients who had been diagnosed with SLN-positive MM and underwent (non)invasive management thereof. Patient cohorts were subdivided according to the treatment received (CLND and waiving CLND). Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and cumulative recurrence rate. Results: We identified 1143 MM patients, of whom 126 (11.0%) had positive SLN status. CLND was waived in the majority of SLN-positive MM cases (n = 71; 56.3%), with 55 (43.7%) patients undergoing CLND. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression revealed no significant advantage for CLND patients compared to non-CLND patients in OS (HR=0.970, p = 0.915 and HR=1.295, p = 0.479, respectively), RFS (HR=1.050, p = 0.849 and HR=1.220, p = 0.544, respectively), and cumulative recurrence rate (HR=1.234, p = 0.441 and HR=1.220, p = 0.544), respectively). Conclusion: We found that CLND had no significant impact on patient survival and MM recurrence rate, thus corroborating the validity of current clinical guidelines.

Impact of extra-nodal extension and AJCC lymph node staging in predicting recurrence following lymphadenectomy in patients with melanoma

BackgroundRegional lymphadenectomy (RL) has traditionally been recommended in patients with melanoma found to have clinical lymphadenopathy or a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Regional control of disease is still a relevant issue for patients, even after undergoing lymphadenectomy. The goal of this study was to identify the clinicopathologic characteristics that predict locoregional recurrence in patients who have undergone either therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) or completion lymph node dissection (CLND) following SLNB. MethodsRetrospective review of population-based cohort of patients with melanoma lymph node metastasis from the years 2005–2015. Multivariate, proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to determine factors predicting nodal recurrence. Results586 patients underwent a RL, with a median follow up of 35 months. Overall, in-basin recurrence rates in the axilla, groin, and head/neck were 7.7 ​%, 8.7 ​% and 9.2 ​%, respectively. Higher unadjusted recurrence rates occurred following CLND than TLND of the groin (12.8 ​% vs 4.5 ​%) and neck (10.0 ​% vs 4.7 ​%) but not the axilla (7.5 ​% vs 8.0 ​%). Upon multivariate analysis, ENE (HR 2.77; p=<0.0001) and the AJCC lymph node stage (N3 vs N1) (HR 2.51; p ​= ​0.025) were predictive of regional recurrence. ConclusionThe AJCC nodal stage and the presence of extranodal extension were the only variables impacting regional recurrence following regional lymphadenectomy for melanoma. When considering regional disease control, they should be factored into treatment decisions, and surveillance strategies.

The Role of Sentinel Node Biopsy in the Era of Adjuvant Therapy for Melanoma.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a surgical procedure aimed to detect nodal metastases in patients with clinically occult disease. Since the advent of new systemic therapies, its role in melanoma has been extensively debated over the last years. In this article, three possible scenarios are discussed, considering the SLNB impact on the management of melanoma patients. First, pT1b and pT2a patients with negative SLNB (stages IA and IB) and those with positive SLNB (stage IIIA) would all not benefit from adjuvant treatment. Therefore, SLNB might be avoided in these categories of patients. Second, in IIB and IIC, melanoma patients are already candidates for adjuvant treatment; therefore, SLNB in patients with T3b, T4a, or T4b melanoma would not change treatment decisions. On the other end of the spectrum, patients with pT2b and pT3a melanomas (clinical stage IIA) represent the only two groups whose management would be significantly affected by the SLNB status, being adjuvant therapy only indicated for SLN-positive patients. Further studies are needed to investigate which melanoma patient deserves SLNB.

Validation of the Melanoma Institute of Australia's Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Risk Prediction Tool for Cutaneous Melanoma.

For patients with cutaneous melanoma, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is used to stage regional lymph nodes pathologically and inform prognosis, treatment, and surveillance. To reduce unnecessary surgeries, predictive tools aim to identify those at lowest risk for node-positive disease. The Melanoma Institute of Australia (MIA)'s Prediction Tool for Sentinel Node Metastasis Risk estimates risk of a positive SLNB using patient age and primary melanoma Breslow depth, histologic subtype, ulceration, mitotic rate, and lymphovascular invasion. A single-institution validation was performedof the MIA Calculator with 982 cutaneous melanoma patients that included all relevant clinicopathologic factors and SLNB pathology outcomes. The study evaluated discrimination via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration via calibration plots, and clinical utility via decision curve analysis of the MIA model in various subgroups. The data were fit to MIA model parameters via a generalized linear model to assess the odds ratio of parameters in our dataset. The Calculator demonstrated limited discrimination based on ROC curves (C-statistic, 0.709) and consistently underestimated risk of SLN positivity. It did not provide a net benefit over SLNB performed on all patients or reduce unnecessary procedures in the risk domain of 0% to 16%. Compared with the original development and validation cohorts, the current study cohort had thinner tumors and a larger proportion of acral melanomas. The Calculator generally underestimated SLN positivity risk, including assessment in patients who would be counseled to forego SLNB based on a predicted risk lower than 5%. Recognition of the tool's current limitations emphasizes the need to refine it further for use in medical decision-making.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is unreliable in predicting melanoma mortality for both younger and older patients.

Melanoma disease patterns vary with patient age. To evaluate sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in managing melanoma at differing patient ages. Online prediction tools were applied to compare SLNB positivity (SLNB+) and survival risk at patient ages 20-80. Tübingen melanoma data were used to determine variations in the hazard ratio of SLNB+ for mortality at different patient ages. Regardless of tumour thickness, predicted SLNB+ rates were markedly higher than mortality rates for 20-year-old patients. For 80-year-old patients, it is the opposite. If 1000 20-year-olds with a 0.4 mm thickness non-ulcerated melanoma underwent SLNB, 100 would likely be positive. If all 100 were to be offered adjuvant drug therapy (ADT), fewer than three more melanoma deaths in those 1000 patients would be avoided. In total, 97 patients would have received medication they may never have needed. If 1000 80-year-olds with a 3 mm thickness non-ulcerated melanoma underwent SLNB, only 40 would likely be positive. In total, 274 patients would be predicted to die of melanoma, 245 being SLNB negative and 29 SLNB+. ADT linked to SLNB+ could deny treatment to 89% of these high-risk patients. The authors relied on published risk data. SLNB has poor specificity at predicting mortality in young melanoma patients and poor sensitivity in older patients. SLNB is not indicated in managing cutaneous melanoma for patients under 40 or over 60 years of age. Many such patients could be managed with wide local excision alone in their clinician's office-based practice. For all cutaneous melanoma patients at all ages, linking ADT to BAUSSS biomarker, (an algorithm of Breslow thickness, age, ulceration, subtype, sex and Site) rather than SLNB+ is likely more appropriate. BAUSSS provides a more accurate melanoma-specific mortality risk assessment for patients without burdening them with added surgery, hospitalization, costs or morbidity risk.

Pathological characteristics predicting sentinel lymph node metastasis in early breast cancer patients.

In this study, we aimed to identify the predicting pathological factors affecting sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer. Our single institution retrospective study was conducted at the Cancer Research Center of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences from 2018 to 2021. Data were imported into and analyzed using SPSS Version 28 for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Of the 76 patients who underwent SLNB, 43 (56.6%) had negative SLNB and 33 (43.4%) had positive SLNB which led to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). The relationship between hormone receptor status (ER/PR/Her2), pathology type (IDC, ILC, DCIS, LCIS), tumor size, and Ki67 expression was assessed. According to the results, axillary lymph node involvement can be predicted based on the scores and results of the three variables: IDC tumor type, lympho vascular invasion (LVI), and Ki67 expression. The positive relationship between IDC tumor type and LVI with SLNB indicates that with positive IDC tumor type and LVI, there is a higher probability of positive axillary lymph nodes (3.88 times higher probability for IDC tumor type and 6.75 times higher probability for the LVI factor). However, when the Ki67 expression is lower, the probability of positive axillary lymph nodes is higher (3.58 times higher probability). IDC tumor type, LVI, and lower Ki67 expression are independent predictive factors of positive SLNB.

Axillary Lymph Node Dissection versus Loco-regional Radiotherapy in Management of the Axilla in Node-Negative Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Post Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

To compare the outcomes of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and loco-regional axillary radiotherapy (ART) on lymphedema and disease recurrence in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) cases that have shown a downstaging of their axillary status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Material and Methods: Sixty patients with LABC with an initial cN1-2 disease showed a downstaging of their axillary status to cN0 after NACT. They were randomized into two groups. The first group (the control group) underwent ALND, while the second group (the study group) had a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and post-operative ART. Patients with failed SLNB or positive SLNB were excluded. All patients were followed up for loco-regional recurrence and lymphedema for at least one year. Results: No Statistical significance was found between both groups regarding loco-regional recurrence. There was a higher rate of arm lymphedema in the control group. Lymphedema was found in 46.7% of patients who underwent ALND, compared to 13.4% in the study group (patients with SLNB and radiotherapy). Axillary radiation after SNLB has shown no difference regarding axillary recurrence when compared to ALND. However, our results were in favor of radiation concerning lymphedema. With all the ongoing research aiming at reducing axillary surgery, this study could be an initiative for a new strategy in LABC. With all the ongoing research aiming at reducing axillary surgery, this study could be an initiative for a new strategy in LABC for patient who have shown down-staging of their axillary status after NACT. Radiotherapy can show better results in the long term with regards lymphedema.

Axillary management of a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in the era of Abemaciclib in early Breast cancer

Axillary management of a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in the era of Abemaciclib in early Breast cancer

Intraoperative Radiation Therapy Delivered by Brachytherapy in Breast Cancer: An Interim Analysis of a Phase 2 Trial

PurposeIntraoperative breast cancer radiotherapy (IORT) offers an alternative to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). The Intraoperative brachytherapy (IOBT) trial applies high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy with a new applicator prototype as IORT after BCS. In this interim analysis of the IOBT trial, we present the oncological safety and toxicity of the method MethodsEligible patients were women, ≥ 50 years old with an unifocal nonlobular, estrogen-receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, cN0, ≤ 3 cm, treated with BCS and sentinel node biopsy (SNB). Toxicity was registered according to the LENT-SOMA scale. Cumulative incidence of local (LR) and regional recurrence (RR) were calculated through cumulative incidence function whereas overall survival (OS) was illustrated through Kaplan–Meier curve. ResultsUntil February 2023, 155 women (median age 68 years) were included in the trial. Twenty-nine women (18.7%) received supplemental EBRT, mostly due to positive SNB. Three-year cumulative incidence of LR and RR were 1.0% (CI 95 % 0.1%-2.3%) and 2.1% (CI 95% 0.8%-4.2%) respectively. Five- year cumulative incidence of LR and RR were 3.9% (CI 95% 1.8%-6.4%) and 2.1% (CI 95% 0.8%-4.2%) respectively. Five-year OS was 96.3% (CI 95% 93.6%-98.4%). Side effects were limited, low grade, and transient. ConclusionAcknowledging the short median follow-up time at interim analysis, our initial results indicate that delivering IORT through HDR brachytherapy in carefully selected breast cancer patients is feasible and oncological safe so far. A long-term follow-up is essential to confirm the initial results.

Pediatric Atypical Melanocytic Proliferations: Single-Site Retrospective Cohort Assessment of Treatment and Long-Term Follow-Up.

Atypical and malignant cutaneous tumors are understudied in the pediatric population, with limited data on long-term follow-up. This study examines pediatric (0-18 years) atypical melanocytic proliferations over a twenty-year period (January 2002-December2022) using the EPIC SlicerDicer at our institution. Over a twenty-year period, there were 55 cases of pediatric melanoma (53 patients). The median follow-up time was 8 years, 11 months. A proportion of 96% were treated with wide local excision (WLE), and 47% had a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) (35% positive rate). There were 101 atypical Spitz tumor cases (85% atypical Spitz tumors, 15% Spitz melanoma), with a median follow-up duration of 9 years. A proportion of 77% were treated with WLE (with one patient dying of metastatic disease). There were 10 cases of atypical melanocytic proliferations not otherwise specified, including 5 pigmented epithelioid melanocytomas (PEM), 4 deep-penetrating nevi, and 1 atypical cellular blue nevus. This study adds to the growing body of knowledge on pediatric atypical cutaneous melanocytic proliferations, aligning with many described characteristics such as disease location and overall survival rates, with distinct exceptions (higher melanoma positive SLNB rate, lower atypical Spitz tumor WLE rate, and a case of fatal metastatic atypical Spitz tumor).

Is sentinel lymph node biopsy needed for lentigo maligna melanoma?

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an area of debate in the management of lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM). The utility of SLNB and its prognostic value in LMM have not yet been studied with large databases. We performed a retrospective review of the National Cancer Database (2012-2020) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (2010-2019) database for patients with cutaneous nonmetastatic LMM with Breslow thickness >1.0 mm. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with SLNB performance and sentinel lymph node (SLN) positivity. Univariable and multivariable analyses assessed overall survival (OS) and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) based on SLNB performance and SLN status. Compared to other melanoma subtypes, LMM had lower rates of SLNB (66.6% vs. 80.0%-84.0%) and SLN positivity (11.3% vs. 18.6%-34.2%). Compared to patients who did not undergo SLNB, SLN status was significantly associated with improved OS in patients with SLN positive (HR = 0.64 [0.55-0.76]) and SLN negative (HR = 0.68 [0.49-0.94]), and worse MSS only in patients with positive SLN (HR = 3.93, p < 0.05). The improved OS associated with SLNB likely implies surgical selection bias. Analysis of MSS confirms appropriate patient selection and suggests important prognostic value associated with SLN status. These results support continued SLNB for LMM patients according to standard guidelines.

Risk factors for sentinel lymph node metastasis in Korean acral and non-acral melanoma patients.

Breslow thickness, ulceration, and mitotic rate are well-known prognostic factors for sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis in cutaneous melanoma. We investigated risk factors, including especially the degree of pigmentation, for SLN metastasis in Korean melanoma patients. We enrolled 158, composed of Korean 107 acral and 51 non-acral melanoma patients who underwent SLN biopsy. Clinicopathologic features such as Breslow thickness, ulceration, mitotic rate, and the degree of pigmentation were evaluated. The recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate and date of recurrence were determined. Fifty-four patients (34.2%) had a positive SLN biopsy result. In a multivariate analysis, Breslow thickness (odds ratio [OR] 1.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-3.47; p = .022) and heavy pigmentation (OR 13.14; 95% CI, 2.96-95.20, p = .002) were associated with SLN metastasis. Positive SLN patients had a higher rate of loco-regional and/or distant recurrence (hazard ratio 6.32; 95% CI, 3.39-11.79; p < .001). Heavy pigmentation was associated with poor RFS. Heavy pigmentation is an independent predictor of SLN metastasis in both acral and non-acral melanoma. Our results suggest the need for in-depth SLN evaluation of cutaneous melanoma patients with heavy pigmentation and provide clinicians with important information for determining patient prognosis.

Recurrence patterns and clinical management after a positive sentinel node biopsy in melanoma patients

Introduction Melanoma patients who become stage III after a positive sentinel node biopsy (SNB) may have several patterns of recurrence Patients and methods Retrospective analysis of melanoma patients who have undergone SNB in a single institution from 2000 to 2015. Results There were 111 recurrences (45.1%) among 246 (20.3%) SNB positive patients and median DRFS was 77.7 months. After initial treatment, further recurrences occurred in 68 (77.3%) patients, regardless the site of initial recurrence Conclusions Multimodal strategies are recommended to achieve better results when managing stage III melanoma patients after a positive SNB

Impact of anesthesia choice in cutaneous melanoma surgery.

Invasive cutaneous melanoma is the most lethal skin cancer, but fortunately, the vast majority can be surgically treated with wide local excision, and sometimes additionally with sentinel or index lymph node biopsy for prognostication. Melanomas are particularly immunogenic malignancies, and preclinical studies have demonstrated that use of volatile anesthetics and opioids, unlike local agents, can suppress the immune system during the perioperative period. Immunosuppression has implications for creating a potentially favorable microenvironment for the survival and propagation of residual melanoma cells or micro-metastases, which could lead to disease relapse, both in the local tumor bed and distally. Results from observational clinical studies are mixed, but the literature would suggest that patients are at risk of decreased melanoma-specific survival after undergoing general anesthesia compared to regional anesthesia and spinal blocks. With the safety of close observation now established rather than automatic completion or total lymph node dissection for patients with either a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy or significant clinical response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy after index node sampling, the indications for definitive surgery with local or regional anesthesia have increased tremendously in recent years. Therefore, cutaneous melanoma patients might benefit from avoidance of general anesthesia and other perioperative drugs that suppress cell-mediated immunity if the option to circumvent systemic anesthesia agents is feasible.

Concordance between Axillary Ultrasound and Sentinel Biopsy in Clinically Node-Negative Early Breast Cancer

Objective: To determine the sensitivity of axillary ultrasound in detecting axillary nodal metastasis in clinically and radiologically uninvolved axillary nodes in early carcinoma breast by comparing with sentinel node biopsy histopathology on frozen section. Study Design: Comparative cross-sectional study Place and Duration of Study: Breast Clinic, CMH, Rawalpindi Pakistan, from Aug 2020 to May 2021. Methodology: Patients included in the study presented with breast cancer lesions with clinically impalpable axillary lymph nodes aged 18-75. Patients with clinically impalpable nodes underwent an ultrasound of the axilla; if suspicious nodes were found, the patient had subsequent axillary node dissection. Sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) was performed on axillary ultrasound in all patients with no suspicious or benign-looking nodes. Histopathological reporting was taken as standard. Lymph nodal status on axillary ultrasound, SLN biopsy and axillary lymph node clearance were documented and analyzed. Results: Twenty-nine patients were included who had benign-looking lymph nodes on axillary ultrasound and underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy. The mean age of the patients was 54.03 ± 7.94. Out of 29 patients, 24(82.8%) patients had negative Sentinel lymph node biopsy, and 5(17.2%) had positive Sentinel lymph node biopsy, who then underwent axillary lymph node dissection. Conclusion: Sentinel lymph node biopsy is the gold standard to determine axillary lymph nodes involved in early carcinoma breast, which seem benign on pre-operative axillary ultrasound.

Spitz tumor with RAF1 fusion: A report of 3 cases

Spitz tumors are melanocytic neoplasms morphologically characterized by spindled and/or epithelioid cells and specific stromal and epidermal changes associated with mutually exclusive fusion kinases involving ALK, ROS1, NTRK1, NTRK2, NTRK3, MET and RET, BRAF and MAP3K8 genes or, less commonly, HRAS mutation.RAF1 fusions have been recently detected in cutaneous melanocytic neoplasms, including conventional melanoma, congenital nevus and BAP-1 inactivated tumors. We report herewith three Spitz neoplasms with a RAF1 fusion, including a previously reported CTDSPL::RAF1 fusion and two novel PPAP2B::RAF1 and ATP2B4::RAF1 fusions. Two cases were classified as Spitz nevus, while the remaining neoplasm was classified as Spitz melanoma at the time of the diagnosis, given 9p21 homozygous deletion and positive sentinel lymph node biopsy. We suggest that RAF1 fused melanocytic neoplasms can represent a novel subgroup of Spitz tumors, with a RAF1 fusion representing an oncogenic driver.