Objective To compare the clinical value of two kinds of imunoassay method including CLIA and ELISA in the detection of related antibody of patients with HCV. Methods 60 patients with HCV were chosen as study subjects, and the related antibodies of patients were detected by CLIA and ELISA.The positive rates of anti-HCV antibody, anti-3E antibody, anti-GP210 antibody, anti-SP100 antibody, anti-PML antibody and anti-AMA-M2 antibody detected by CLIA and ELISA were compared. Results The positive rates of anti-HCV antibody detected by CLIA and ELISA were 83.33%(50/60), 98.33%(59/60), respectively.The anti-HCV antibody detected by CLIA was significantly higher than by ELISA(χ2=4.73, P=0.03). The positive rates of anti-3E antibody, anti-GP210 antibody, anti-SP100 antibody, anti-PML antibody and anti-AMA-M2 antibody detected by ELISA were 11.67%(7/60), 6.67%(4/60), 11.67%(7/60), 10.00%(6/60), 11.67%(7/60), respectively, those detected by CLIA were 73.33%(44/60), 50.00%(30/60), 38.33%(23/60), 58.33%(35/60), 80.00%(48/60), respectively.The positive rates of anti-3E antibody, anti-GP210 antibody, anti-SP100 antibody, anti-PML antibody and anti-AMA-M2 antibody detected by CLIA were significantly higher than by ELISA(χ2=18.81, 11.51, 13.23, 15.08, 13.75, all P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with ELISA, CLIA in the detection of related antibodies of patients with HCV can efficiently higher the positive rate of anti-HCV and autoantibody. Key words: Chemiluminescent measurements; Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; Hepatitis C antibodies
Read full abstract