RATIONALE: There is a concept that infants present lower cutaneous reactivity to SPT for food allergy diagnosis. The aim of this study is to describe the results of SPT to cow's milk in infants with suspicion of CMA.METHODS: It was included 39 infants (17F: 22 M) under 2 years old among 170 CMA pediatric patients. Two groups were defined: Group I: patients ≤ 6 months (n = 8) and Group II: from 6 months to 2 years (n = 31). The criteria of CMA diagnosis were: clinical history, presence of specific IgE for milk (SPT ≥ 3 mm or RAST ≥ 3.5 KU/L) and positive oral challenge test for milk (open or double blind placebo controlled). The SPT was done with milk in commercial extract (IPI ASAC) and “in natura”. Histamine was used as positive control. Anaphylatic patients were submitted to SPT after one year of follow up without anaphylaxis episodes.RESULTS: Cutaneous symptoms were present in 31 (79.4%), gastrointestinal in 22 (56.4%), respiratory in 9 (23.0%) and anaphylaxis in 14 (35.8%). SPT was positive in 7 patients (87.5%) from group I and 23 (74.1%) in group II. The wheal ≥ 6 mm was found in 1 patient from group I and 20 from Group II. The comparison between the extracts was favorable to commercial ones (25x17).CONCLUSIONS: In this series the SPT was a useful diagnostic method for IgE-mediated CMA in infants, being the commercial extract more positive than “in natura CM”. The SPT ≥ 6 mm was more frequent in children with age ≥ 6 months. RATIONALE: There is a concept that infants present lower cutaneous reactivity to SPT for food allergy diagnosis. The aim of this study is to describe the results of SPT to cow's milk in infants with suspicion of CMA. METHODS: It was included 39 infants (17F: 22 M) under 2 years old among 170 CMA pediatric patients. Two groups were defined: Group I: patients ≤ 6 months (n = 8) and Group II: from 6 months to 2 years (n = 31). The criteria of CMA diagnosis were: clinical history, presence of specific IgE for milk (SPT ≥ 3 mm or RAST ≥ 3.5 KU/L) and positive oral challenge test for milk (open or double blind placebo controlled). The SPT was done with milk in commercial extract (IPI ASAC) and “in natura”. Histamine was used as positive control. Anaphylatic patients were submitted to SPT after one year of follow up without anaphylaxis episodes. RESULTS: Cutaneous symptoms were present in 31 (79.4%), gastrointestinal in 22 (56.4%), respiratory in 9 (23.0%) and anaphylaxis in 14 (35.8%). SPT was positive in 7 patients (87.5%) from group I and 23 (74.1%) in group II. The wheal ≥ 6 mm was found in 1 patient from group I and 20 from Group II. The comparison between the extracts was favorable to commercial ones (25x17). CONCLUSIONS: In this series the SPT was a useful diagnostic method for IgE-mediated CMA in infants, being the commercial extract more positive than “in natura CM”. The SPT ≥ 6 mm was more frequent in children with age ≥ 6 months.