Positive FCXM Research Articles

Clinical Significance of a Positive Flow Crossmatch on the Outcomes of Cadaveric Renal Transplants

Pretransplantation crossmatching is an integral part of kidney transplantation. Flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM) is more sensitive than complement-dependent cytotoxic crossmatch (CDC-XM). However, the clinical significance of positive FCXM with negative CDC-XM is controversial. We evaluated FCXM in 455 consecutive deceased donor renal transplants. All had a negative CDC-XM. There were 341 T-cell and B-cell FCXM negative and 38 T-cell and B-cell positive. There was a higher percentage of retransplantations and HLA mismatches (26.3% vs 8.2%, P = .002 and 2.45 vs 1.99, P = .02, respectively) in the FCXM-positive group compared with the FCXM-negative group; 65.8% of the FCXM-positive patients had rejection compared with 49.3% of the FCXM-negative patients (odds ratio [OR] = 1.89, P = .06). FCXM-positive patients had a higher incidence of vascular rejection (28.9% vs 12.6%, OR = 2.68, P = .008). One- and 5-year graft survivals were 84% and 66% in the FCXM-positive group vs 90% and 75% in the FCXM-negative group. Censoring for patient death, 1- and 5-year graft survivals were 84% and 73% in the FCXM-positive group vs 94% and 82% in the FCXM-negative group. There was no difference in renal function between the 2 groups. In conclusion, a positive T-cell and B-cell FCXM transplant with a negative CDC-XM is associated with a higher incidence of rejection, twice the risk of vascular rejection, and a trend toward poorer graft survival.

Luminex donor‐specific crossmatches

In Luminex bead-based screening assays, color-coded microspheres coated with human leukocyte antigens (HLA) are used to identify both complement-binding and non-complement-binding HLA class I and II antibodies in recipient sera. Many laboratories rely on their specificity detection and use the information obtained for allocation of donor organs. A donor-specific crossmatch in the Luminex technique (LumXm) is for that reason desirable. A LumXm, in which the actual donor HLA are coated onto specific capture beads, was tested for 88 pre- and posttransplant sera of 18 recipients. The results were compared with previously published flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXm) results for the same donor-recipient combinations. All sera were also examined by Luminex single antigen (SA) tests. Class I LumXm detected 24 of 27 T-cell positive FCXm (89%) and class II 15 of 22 B-cell positive FCXm (68%). Sensitivity of LumXm for class I and II was 89% and 68% and specificity was 98% and 97%, respectively. Discrepant LumXm results were obtained in 13 sera of nine patients (15%). In general, based on SA testing, FCXm showed false-positive results for class I and LumXm gave false-negative and positive results for class II. The LumXm test was proven not to react with recipient sera containing DQ antibodies only, also DP detection was insufficient. The validity of the LumXm has been shown for class I, but its value for class II is uncertain. HLA-DR is most probably correctly identified, the validity for DQ and DP is doubtful.

No alloantibodies against mesenchymal stromal cells, but presence of anti-fetal calf serum antibodies, after transplantation in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell recipients

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) may be used in cellular therapy to treat graft-versus-host-disease and autoimmune disorders, and in regenerative medicine. Preliminary data suggest limited cellular allogeneic rejection, but less is known about humoral responses. The objective of this study was to investigate whether antibodies against MSC were present after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) including treatment with matched or mismatched allogeneic MSC. Twelve patients were evaluated using flow cytometric cross matches (FCXM) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Expression of blood group antigens, regarded as alloantigens giving rise to humoral alloimmunity, on MSC were explored using flow cytometry and immunofluorescence. Three of 12 patients exhibited late positivity in the FCXM. In absorption studies, antibodies directed against fetal calf serum (FCS), a component of the MSC culture medium, were identified. Healthy individuals expressed varying levels of anti-FCS antibodies and the same pattern was seen in immunosuppressed HSCT patients. MSC did not express blood group antigens. The patients with positive FCXM are alive and well. We have shown that immunosuppressed patients can exhibit anti-FCS antibodies, but no alloantibodies, that may bind to MSC. These antibodies seem clinically insignificant.

Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as screening method for anti-paternal allo-antibodies in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL)

Objectives Non-HLA-specific anti-paternal antibodies (APA) have been associated with immune responses against HLA-negative trophoblast. As screening for APA by using the flow cytometric cross match (FCXM) is complicated, we evaluated the One Lambda Antigen Tray Test (OLATT) an easy screening method for antibodies in organ transplant recipients. Study design We randomly selected 92 patients of our recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL)-clinic merely on the basis of having had at least two consecutive miscarriages at <20 weeks representing positive and negative FCXM results. Stored sera were thawed and tested by OLATT. Concordance (Kappa statistic) and conformance (Chi-square test to McNemar) of FCXM and OLATT results were analysed. Results Of 48 FCXM-positive patients, 38 (79.2%) were positive and 10 (20.8%) negative by OLATT. Out of 44 FCXM negative patients, 37 (84.1%) were negative and 7 (15.9%) positive by OLATT. This resulted in a positive prediction value of 84.4%, a negative prediction value of 78.7% and a highly significant concordance ( κ = 0.631 ( p < 0.0001; 81.5% versus 50%)) and conformance ( p = 0.23) between FCXM and OLATT in RPL patients. Conclusion Using the OLATT could substitute the FCXM in screening RPL patients for APA and this might help to more closely study the role of APA in human gestation.

Relevance of Posttransplant Flow Cytometric T- and B-cell Crossmatches in Tacrolimus-Treated Renal Transplant Patients

De novo development of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies after transplantation is associated with increased rejection and decreased graft survival. In this study, the effect of posttransplant HLA antibodies on clinical outcome was evaluated in patients treated with tacrolimus by means of flow cytometric crossmatches (FCXm). T- and B-cell FCXm were performed retrospectively on posttransplant sera of patients who received a graft between 1997 and 1999. Ninety-four kidney-only recipients were tested and all FCXm positive sera were investigated for the presence of HLA class I and II antibodies by Flow panel reactive antibodies. From 94 patients with a negative pretransplant complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch, seven (7%) showed a positive pretransplant FCXm. After transplantation the FCXm became positive in five patients (6%). The predictive value of a positive FCXm after transplantation, and the log-transformed relative change in fluorescence ratio between pretransplant and posttransplant serum, were not significant to rejection within six months, nor to graft survival censored for death. The presence of HLA antibodies before rejection or graft failure could only be shown in a minority of patients; most antibodies were detected after graft failure, especially after transplantectomy. Monitoring through antibody testing after transplantation on the basis of our results has no added value with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression.

Pancreas Transplantation Utilizing Thymoglobulin, Sirolimus, and Cyclosporine

This study aims to determine the impact of thymoglobulin-sirolimus-cyclosporine immunosuppression on the alloimune response of pancreas-kidney transplant recipients. Thirty-six pancreas transplant recipients received an induction protocol of thymoglobulin, sirolimus, reduced-dose cyclosporine, and corticosteroids. Ten recipients were also enrolled in a study to measure immune responsiveness. Flow PRA determined HLA antibody, donor-specific flow cytometry crossmatching (FCXM), T-cell subset, and suppressor cell assays were performed during the first posttransplant year. One-year patient, kidney, and pancreas graft survivals were 97%, 94%, and 92%, respectively. There was one death and three graft losses. There were no acute rejection episodes. Recipients in the immune-monitoring study (n=10) displayed>80% depression of CD3, CD4, and CD8 (+) cell counts up to 3 months posttransplant. At transplantation 9/10 patients displayed<10% class I and no class II HLA antibody. By 3 months, 7/10 monitored recipients showed a transient elevation in class I HLA antibodies, including 2 patients who expressed>80% Flow PRA. One patient was pretransplant FCXM positive, whereas by 3 months posttransplant 2/10 patients demonstrated a positive FCXM. There were no clinical consequences of the presence of HLA antibody or the positive FCXMs. By 6 months, 7/9 patients demonstrated immunoregulatory suppressor cells. The absence of acute rejection events was likely due to inhibition of donor-specific immunity by the immunosuppressive regimen. Seventy percent of patients demonstrated an early, non-donor-directed HLA antibody response that had no adverse effect on graft function and 78% of the monitored patients displayed immunoregulatory cells probably contributing to the successful outcomes.

Elevated B-Cell Autoantibodies Among HIV + Transplant Candidates: Crossmatch Implications

We report our experience in assessing autoantibodies among HIV + patients considered for renal transplantation. Autoantibodies against autologous T and B cells were determined by complement-dependent cytotoxicity autocrossmatching (CDC) or flow cytometric autocrossmatching (FCXM) for 28 HIV + and 72 HIV − men. T-cell CDC was negative among HIV + and HIV − individuals (0%). In contrast, B-cell CDC was higher among HIV + than HIV − patients (71% vs 4%, P = .001). However, HIV + patients also showed unusual sensitivity to complement that potentially invalidated the B-cell CDC. Complement sensitivity was higher among those with positive versus negative HIV RNA (71% vs 25%, P < .01). Alternate use of FCXM showed equivalent T-cell FCXM between HIV + versus HIV − individuals (5% vs 1%, P = NS). However, B-cell FCXM was more prevalent among HIV + than HIV − patients (45% vs 2%, P < .01). B-cell FCXM was higher among patients with positive than negative HIV RNA (57% vs 25%, P < .05). Simulated allocrossmatching against unrelated DR-matched donors showed that two out of four HIV + patients with positive FCXM had positive allocrossmatches that were eliminated when allocrossmatching was repeated using autoabsorbed serum. We conclude that HIV + patients are more likely to produce B-cell autoantibodies than HIV − individuals, which, if not realized, could cause false-positive allocrossmatches and inappropriate transplant denial.

Equal overall rejection rate in pre-transplant flow-cytometric cross-match negative and positive adult recipients in liver transplantation

T cell IgG flow-cytometric cross-matches (FCXM) using 48 stored pre-transplant patient serum samples and 40 stored serum samples collected 3 wk after liver transplantation and frozen spleen cells of cadaveric donors in 48 consecutive liver transplantations were performed retrospectively. T cell IgG FCXM using pre-transplant serum samples was compared with 46 complement-dependent lymphocytotoxic cross-matches (CDCXM) performed at the time of transplantation. Clinical relevance of these tests was evaluated in relation to acute rejection, 1-, 3- and 5-yr graft and patient survival. The incidence of positive FCXM was 33% (16 of 48) and 13% (six of 46) by CDCXM. The median time of acute rejection was 29 d after transplantation in FCXM positive group (range 13-101 d) and 22 d in FCXM negative group (range 7-157 d, NS). Rejection rate was similar in 16 pre-transplant FCXM positive patients (eight of 16, 50%) compared with six pre-transplant CDCXM positive patients (three of six, 50%; NS). Recipients having graft rejection tended to be more often pre-transplant FCXM positive (eight of 21, 38%) than CDCXM positive (three of 21, 14%), but the difference was not significant (p > 0.1). No difference was found in the positive predictive value in relation to acute rejection between positive FCXM and CDCXM (69% vs. 50%; NS). Furthermore there was no correlation between post-transplant positive FCXM and acute rejection. No difference was found between pre-transplant T cell IgG FCXM positive and negative recipients in relation to graft or patient survival. Our findings are supportive for little risk associated with preformed donor-specific antibodies in liver transplantation.

Graft Survival and Immune Regulation of Pancreas Allograft Recipients Induced With Thymoglobulin, Sirolimus, and Cyclosporine

Background Our objective was to determine the impact of thymoglobulin–sirolimus–cyclosporine immunosuppression on the alloimune response of pancreas–kidney transplant recipients. Methods Thirty-six pancreas transplant recipients received an induction protocol of thymoglobulin, sirolimus, reduced-dose cyclosporine, and corticosteroids. A subset of 10 recipients were also enrolled in a study to measure immune responsiveness. Flow PRA–determined HLA antibody, donor-specific flow cytometry crossmatching (FCXM), T-cell subset, and suppressor cell assays were performed at various timepoints during the first posttransplant year. Results One-year patient, kidney, and pancreas survivals were 97%, 94%, and 92%, respectively. There was 1 death due to sepsis, and 1 kidney and 2 pancreas graft losses. There were no acute rejection episodes. Recipients in the immune-monitoring study displayed depression of CD3, CD4, and CD8 counts (<80%) until 3 months posttransplant. At transplantation, 9 of 10 patients displayed <10% class I HLA antibody. By 3 months, 7 of 10 showed a transient elevation in class I HLA antibodies, with 2 patients expressing >80% flow PRA. At transplant 1 patient was FCXM-positive, whereas, by 3 months posttransplant, 2 of 10 patients demonstrated a positive FCXM. There were no clinical consequences to either the presence of HLA antibody or the positive FCXMs. By 6 months, 7 of 9 patients expressed immunoregulatory suppressor cell activity. Conclusions The absence of acute rejection events was likely due to inhibition of donor-specific immunity. Seventy percent of patients demonstrated an early non–donor-directed HLA antibody response that had no adverse effect on graft function and 78% of the patients displayed immunoregulatory suppressor cell function, probably contributing to the successful clinical outcome.

New Crossmatch Technique Eliminates Interference by Humanized and Chimeric Monoclonal Antibodies

Humanized and chimeric antilymphocyte antibodies (Ab) are used to prevent and treat rejection and for treatment of human disease. Rituximab (RIT, anti-CD20), daclizumab (DAC; anti-CD25), alemtuzumab (ALE; anti-CD52), or infliximab (IFX) may interfere with Ab detection methods such as complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM). These agents are recognized as anti-human Ab or fix complement and are not differentiated from anti-allo-Ab. A new enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay crossmatch (XM) utilizing class I and II HLA antigens from donor cells called Transplant Monitoring System (TMS; GTI, Waukesha, Wisc) potentially precludes interference by eliminating non-major histocompatability complex antigens. To test this, normal sera (nonsensitized volunteers) were supplemented with 0.1 or 10 μg/mL of RIT, DAC, IFX or ALE, and were tested using three methods: the TMS T-cell CDCXM with antihuman globulin (AHG); and B-cell CDCXM without AHG; and FCXM with mean channel shifts of 45 and 150 indicating positive T-cell and B-cell crossmatch, respectively. No reactivity occurred with normal sera using any crossmatch technique. At 0.1 and 10 μg/mL, RIT interfered with CDC B-cell, but not T-cell crossmatch. RIT at 10, but not 0.1 μg/mL interfered with B-cell FCXM. No interference occurred with RIT in T-cell FCXM or TMS. ALE interfered with B-cell and T-cell CDC and FCXM but neither class I nor II TMS. DAC did not interfere with CDC or FCXM at 0.1 μg/mL, but gave false positive B-cell FCXM and CDCXM with some samples. No interference by DAC occurred using TMS. TMS may be useful to differentiate de novo donor-specific Ab after treatment with humanized or chimeric Ab.

The impact of pre-transplant flow cytometry crossmatches on renal allograft outcome: A pilot study

BACKgrOUND: Pre-Transplant Complement Dependent Cytotoxicity (CDC) Crossmatch is an established procedure known to influence renal allograft survival rates. The Flow Cytometry Crossmatch (FCXM) is considered more sensitive, and based on literature reports, is believed to enhance renal allograft outcome. Before utilizing this procedure, some programs are requiring center specific data. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of a positive FCXM on renal allograft outcome in a single center. METHOD: Fifty-six patients who received renal transplants at The Transplant Institute of New Orleans were investigated. The pre-transplant workup included both a CDC and FCXM. A negative CDC crossmatch against donor T Cells was required for inclusion in the study. The results of the Flow Crossmatch were not used for excluding patients for getting a transplant. The clinical outcome in terms of successful versus failed transplants was recorded over a three year period. A failed graft was defined as return to dialysis. RESULTS: Nine out of fifty-six renal allografts failed due to immunologic rejections. An additional two grafts were lost due to other reasons. Amongst those who lost the renal grafts due to rejection, thirty-three percent had a positive pre-transplant FCXM. On the other hand, the FCXM was positive in sixteen percent of those who had functioning renal grafts. CONCLUSION: Although these numbers are small, the data suggest that positive FCXMS are related to lower renal allograft survival rates at our center. Further studies will be performed on a larger patient population.

T-cell flow-cytometry crossmatch and long-term renal graft survival.

Flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) is a more sensitive technique than classical complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) for the detection of donor-directed antibody before renal transplantation. Nevertheless, the role of FCXM in predicting long-term survival of kidney grafts is still unclear. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the impact of a positive T-cell FCXM (T-FCXM) on long-term kidney allografts outcome. Of the 184 consecutive kidney transplantations performed in our center between 1 January1991 and 15 November 1996 a FCXM, performed concurrently to the pre-transplant CDCXM, was available for 170 patients. The CDCXM was negative in all recipients. Among these recipients, 12 (7.1%) had a positive T-FCXM. These patients were not different from patients with a negative T-FCXM for donor and recipient age, sex, frequency of second transplantation, number of human leukocyte antigen matches or mismatches. Frequency of immunized patients was higher in kidney recipients with a positive FCXM (58.3% vs. 24.7%; p=0.02, chi-square test). Survival analysis revealed that kidney graft outcome was better in negative T-FCXM recipients (p=0.03), while patient survival was not statistically different. Our results suggest that a positive pre-transplant T-FCXM despite a negative CDCXM is associated with an impaired long-term graft survival in renal allotransplantation.

Successful Simultaneous Pancreas Kidney Transplantation from Living-Related Donor Against Positive Cross-Match

A positive pretransplant flow cytometry cross-match (FC-XM) allows precise identification of high-risk recipients vulnerable to hyperacute or accelerated rejection after transplantation. Living donor kidney transplant recipient candidates with positive cross-match have been successfully treated with a combination of plasmapheresis (therapeutic plasma exchange, TPEX) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), achieving conversion to negative cross-match and successful transplant. We report the first successful case of simultaneous pancreas kidney transplant (SPKT) from a living donor (LD) performed against an initially positive FC-XM, converted to negative using a protocol based on TPEX and IVIG in combination with antiCD20 monoclonal antibody. This strategy of overcoming the cross-match barriers in living donation may offer a chance of successful transplantation to highly sensitized candidates for SPKT, for whom cadaveric transplant is difficult to achieve.

Conundrums with FlowPRA™ beads

In 1969, a study by Patel and Terasaki persuaded the renal transplant community that a pre-transplant cross-match should always be performed between donor and recipient to detect HLA antibodies and prevent hyperacute allograft rejection. Although the role of the cross-match among nonsensitized patients is controversial, its importance among sensitized recipients is undeniable. Over the past 30 years, more sensitive techniques, such as the flow cytometric cross-match (FCXM), were developed to identify low levels of antibodies undetectable by other approaches. The clinical relevance of a positive FCXM, however, has been hotly disputed, with some investigators maintaining that the FCXM is 'too sensitive' and rules out acceptable donor-recipient combinations. An alternative explanation is that the FCXM is non-specific, and, at least in certain situations, identifies non-HLA antibodies that are clinically irrelevant. Recently, a solid phase immunoassay utilizing purified HLA Class I or Class II molecules bound to microparticles (FlowPRA) was developed. Ideally, use of the FlowPRA for the identification of HLA antibodies in recipient sera would help ascertain whether a positive FCXM with donor cells was truly the result of an HLA-specific antibody. As shown here, this may not always be true. In this study, two unexpected serum patterns were observed. Pattern 1: FlowPRA beads were positive (with an associated HLA Class I specificity) and the FCXM with cells expressing the HLA antigen(s) to which the antibody was directed, was negative. Sequence analysis of the HLA antigens reactive with this unexpected antibody suggests that the epitope recognized resides on the floor of the groove, a site generally not expected to generate antibody activity. Pattern 2: FlowPRA beads were negative yet the FCXM was T and B cell positive. Further analysis of the FlowPRA negative/FCXM positive sera using a flow cytometric cell-based panel reactive antibody (PRA) approach revealed those sera to have specific anti-HLA Class I activity. We suspect that both types of antibodies described above have clinical relevance. Thus, a negative or positive FCXM (when the FlowPRA against donor antigens is positive or negative, respectively) is not always a straightforward interpretation.

Comparison of two drug regimens upon clinical outcome among renal transplant recipients with positive flow cytometric crossmatches

Renal transplant recipients with positive flow cytometric crossmatches (FCXM) face greater risk of early rejection and graft failure. It is clear that the pharmacologic needs of this high risk group have not been identified. We retrospectively compared the impact of two drug regimens upon early rejection and 5 yr actuarial survival among 324 primary cadaveric transplant recipients with positive and negative FCXM. Patients received either Regimen I (OKT3 induction, cyclosporine and steroids) or Regimen II (mycophenolate mofetil with cyclosporine or Prograf). Recipient gender, age, disease etiology, ethnic distribution and cytotoxic panel reactive antibody (PRA) were equivalent between regimens (p=ns). With Regimen I, the incidence of rejection was greater for FCXM positive vs. FCXM negative patients (51 vs. 21%, p=0.001). In contrast, with Regimen II the incidence of rejection for FCXM positive and FCXM negative patients was equivalent (18 vs. 12%, p=ns) and lower than patients treated with Regimen I (p < 0.01). Ethnic variation was only observed with Regimen I in which African Americans with positive FCXM had more rejections than Caucasians (60 vs. 45%, p < 0.05). Five-year actuarial survival was lower for FCXM positive vs. FCXM negative patients treated with Regimen I (40 vs. 75%, p=0.0006) or Regimen 2 (60 vs. 90%, p=0.001). Allograft survival was equivalent (p=ns) among FCXM positive individuals receiving Regimen I or II. However, allograft survival among FCXM negative individuals improved with Regimen II (p < 0.05). Ethnic variation in survival was not observed with either regimen (p=ns).

The number of amino acid residues mismatches correlates with flow cytometry crossmatching results in high PRA renal patients

Highly sensitized renal transplant candidates present a group at high risk for acute and chronic rejection. The probability of finding compatible donors for these recipients is significantly lower in comparison to those who have low PRA values. As a consequence, these patients spend longer time on the waiting list and become tethered to dialysis. The results of final cross match (XM) are critical for making a decision about whether such a candidate receives an organ or not. The degree of donor and recipient HLA compatibility predicts the results of XM. The goal of this study was to expand a variety of acceptable HLA-AB mismatches (MM) for high PRA kidney recipients using the HLAMATCHMAKER algorithm. This strategy focuses on the fine structural features of HLA polymorphism comprising amino acid residues or triplets (AAT), which are located in α-helical coils of HLA molecules and are available to antibodies. We analyzed serum samples from thirty-nine highly alloimmunized recipients (PRA ⩾ 85%). The level of sensitization was detected using FlowPRA Class I Screening Test. This group of transplant candidates included thirteen recipients who demonstrated negative results of final T/B FCXM and twenty-six, who were FCXM positive. The application of the HLAMATCHMAKER algorithm based on the HLA class I donor and recipient typing allowed us to detect the total number of AATMM as well as the number of immunogenic AAT in both FCXM negative and FCXM positive groups of recipients. Significantly greater numbers of both total and highly immunogenic AATMM have been emerged in the group of FCXM positive patients. Furthermore, the results of this analysis have shown a high degree of probability of positive FCXM if the number of highly immunogenic AATMM was ⩾ 1 (χ 2 = 22.9 Yate’s correction; p = 0.000001). We did not observe overlapping between antibody specificity and permissible HLA-AB MM detected using the HLAMATCHMAKER strategy. Thus, the number of highly immunogenic AATMM can serve as a reliable predictive value for final FCXM results in highly sensitized renal transplant candidates. The HLAMATCHMAKER algorithm appears to be the proper strategy to find donors for high PRA recipients.

Capillary C4d deposition in kidney allografts: a specific marker of alloantibody-dependent graft injury.

Capillary deposition of the complement split product C4d has been discussed as a marker for antibody-mediated kidney allograft rejection. The relationship between C4d staining and posttransplant alloantibody detection remains to be thoroughly investigated, however. In this study, C4d staining in peritubular capillaries (PTC) and the incidence of alloantibody formation, as detected with sensitive techniques, were evaluated among a cohort of transplant recipients who had undergone biopsies and had not been selected for a specific histologic diagnosis. One hundred thirteen biopsies, obtained from 58 cadaveric kidney transplant recipients, were tested. Serum samples obtained at the time of biopsy were evaluated by flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM) testing and FlowPRA (One Lambda, Inc., Canoga Park, CA) analysis of anti-HLA panel reactivity. Most biopsies with C4d deposits in PTC (C4d(PTC)(+), n = 21 of 24) were associated with positive posttransplant FCXM results (T and/or B cell FCXM) and/or > or =5% FlowPRA (anti-HLA class I and/or II) reactivity. Approximately 50% of the C4d(PTC)(-) biopsies were observed to be associated with donor-specific alloantibodies. Accordingly, high specificity (93%) but low sensitivity (31%) were calculated for capillary C4d staining (with FCXM testing as the standard method). For clinical evaluation, three patient groups were defined, i.e., a group of recipients with positive C4d staining in at least one allograft biopsy (C4d(PTC)(+), n = 16) and two C4d(PTC)(-) groups, which were discriminated on the basis of posttransplant FCXM results as C4d(PTC)(-)/FCXM(+) (n = 22) and C4d(PTC)(-)/FCXM(-) (n = 20) groups. Univariate analyses revealed significant differences between these groups with respect to serum creatinine levels at 12 mo [median, 2.83 mg/dl (interquartile range, 1.93 to 4.2 mg/dl) versus 1.78 mg/dl (1.47 to 2.24 mg/dl) versus 1.59 mg/dl (1.2 to 1.71 mg/dl), P < 0.001]. Of the five immunologic graft losses, four occurred in the C4d(PTC)(+) group and one occurred in the C4d(PTC)(-)/FCXM(+) group. In a multivariate analysis, C4d positivity was observed to have an independent predictive value for inferior 12-mo graft function (P = 0.02), whereas the observed moderate difference between C4d(PTC)(-)/FCXM(+) and C4d(PTC)(-)/FCXM(-) recipients did not achieve significance. In conclusion, these data demonstrate that positive C4d staining, which is an independent predictor of kidney graft dysfunction, represents a reliable specific marker for antibody-dependent graft injury.

Flow cytometric crossmatching in primary renal transplant recipients with a negative anti-human globulin enhanced cytotoxicity crossmatch.

Flow cytometric crossmatching (FCXM) and panel reactive antibody (PRA) screening techniques are more sensitive than anti-human globulin enhanced cytotoxicity (AHG-CDC) techniques at detecting anti-HLA antibodies. The clinical significance of a positive FCXM in primary renal transplant recipients with a negative AHG-CDC crossmatch is unclear. We performed retrospective FCXM and flow cytometric panel reactive antibody (FlowPRA) determinations in primary renal transplant recipients with a negative T cell AHG-CDC crossmatch and a negative B cell CDC crossmatch pretransplant. Eighteen (13%) of 143 patients exhibited a positive retrospective T cell FCXM. Of these patients, six (33%) experienced early graft loss with explant histology, demonstrating antibody-mediated rejection in five of six cases. The 12 patients with positive T cell FCXM who maintained their grafts experienced more adverse events posttransplant, including more early, steroid-resistant, and recurrent rejection. Furthermore, in a subgroup of patients undergoing protocol biopsies, those with a positive T cell FCXM exhibited more subclinical rejection. Anti-HLA antibodies were detected by FlowPRA in all 18 patients with a positive T cell FCXM, whereas AHG-CDC PRA detected antibodies in only 8 of 18 patients. Therefore, flow cytometric techniques identify sensitized primary renal transplant recipients undetected by AHG-CDC techniques. In those patients, a positive T cell FCXM is associated with an increased risk of early graft loss due to antibody-mediated rejection and may represent a relative contraindication to transplantation. Moreover, those patients are also at increased risk of severe and recurrent rejection, which may carry implications for long-term graft outcomes.

Clinical implications of flow cytometry crossmatch with T or B cells in living donor liver transplantation.

Acute allograft rejection (AR) in solid organ transplantation is generally regarded to develop through cell-mediated immune response following activation of helper T cells. Since production of antibodies is also mediated by helper T cells, humoral immunity may play some roles in AR. Although flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) is reported as a useful method for the detection of antibodies against donor antigen, specific role of T- or B-cell FCXM and its sensitivity for AR is controversial. T- and B-cell FCXM using fresh donor peripheral lymphocytes were performed before and after blood-type compatible living donor liver transplantation in 47 patients. IgM and IgG anti-donor antibodies were analyzed in relation to clinical AR. Positive pre-transplant T-cell FCXM was associated with a high incidence of positive post-transplant T-cell FCXM (p=0.017). Four of five cases (80%) with positive pre-transplant T-cell FCXM experienced earlier AR (day 8.0+/-4.4, mean+/-SD) than 16 of 42 cases (31%) with negative pre-transplant T-cell FCXM (17.3+/-6.8; p=0.016). In addition, higher dose of steroids was given to treat AR episodes in cases with positive pre-transplant T-cell FCXM (79.9+/-10.3 mg/kg/month) than in those with negative pre-transplant T-cell FCXM (47.1+/-26.6; p=0.039). In the first month after transplantation, 13 episodes of positive post-transplant T-cell FCXM were all concomitant with or preceded clinical AR compared with seven ARs in T-cell FCXM-negative cases (p<0.0001). T-cell FCXM between positive sera and third parties revealed some crossreactions. In contrast, detection of antibodies by B-cell FCXM in pre- and post-transplant phases was scarcely associated with AR, and no correlation was found between T- and B-cell FCXM before and after transplantation. Positive T-cell FCXM is closely related with AR and that before transplantation is a predictor of early and refractory AR as well as post-transplant FCXM. In contrast, not a few detections of antibodies irrelevant to AR are observed in B-cell FCXM, suggesting its low specificity.

Anti‐Paternal Antibodies by Flow Cytometry in the Management of Alloimmunization on Recurrent Miscarriages

There is no reliable laboratory test available to diagnose immunologically mediated miscarriages. We investigated the clinical significance of maternal anti-paternal leukocyte antibodies by flow cytometry after alloimmunization. The flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) was performed in 158 patients with a history of three or more unexplained first-trimester miscarriages without live birth. After negative FCXM patients were immunized, subsequent pregnancy outcomes and FCXM results were followed. Of 112 subsequent pregnancies, 83 of 100 (83.0%) FCXM-positive patients after immunotherapy had successful pregnancy outcomes, whereas seven of 10 (70.0%) FCXM-negative patients had miscarriages (P = 0.0001). The percent live birth ratio was 2.77 (CI, 1.07-7.16; P=0.0001) for FCXM-positive patients compared to FCXM-negative patients. The calculated predictive value showed that 75.6% of FCXM-negative patients would have subsequent miscarriages. Positive FCXM is closely associated with successful pregnancy outcome following immunotherapy. We propose that FCXM might be included in the routine laboratory tests for the management of recurrent miscarriages.