Positive Discography Research Articles

Does the high-intensity zone of lumbar intervertebral disc at magnetic resonance imaging have diagnostic value for discogenic low back pain? A meta-analysis

ObjectiveThe correlation between high-intensity zone (HIZ) of lumbar disc magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and discogenic low back pain (DLBP) is currently controversial, this study aimed to systematically evaluate the correlation between HIZ of lumbar disc MRI and positive discography, as well as its diagnostic value for DLBP.MethodDatabases were searched to include research literature on high intensity zone (HIZ) related to discography and DLBP diagnosis. HIZ is a separate small, confined area of high signal located at the posterior border of the annulus fibrosus on MRI T2-weighted images of the lumbar spine, which is separated from the nucleus pulposus but has a higher signal than the nucleus pulposus. Studies on the correlation of HIZ with discography and DLBP diagnosis were searched in the Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, Science Direct, China Knowledge Network, Wanfang Database, and China Biomedical Literature Databases, Scopus from January 1992 to June 2024. The outcomes were diagnostic values of HIZ for DLBP. The risk assessment was performed by Deeks’ funnel methods in the Stata 17.0 software after 2 investigators independently screened the literature, extracted information and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies.ResultsA total of 25 studies including 5889 patients were included. meta-analysis showed that the sensitivity of HIZ for the diagnosis of DLBP was (0.49, 95% CI [0.37,0.61]) and specificity was (0.89, 95% CI [0.85,0.93]); the positive likelihood ratio was (4.52, 95% CI [3.28,6.25]) and the negative likelihood ratio was (0.58, 95% CI [0.46,0.71]). The diagnostic ratio was (7.87, 95% CI [5.05,12.26]).ConclusionThe available evidence suggests that HIZ has acceptable sensitivity and high specificity in the diagnosis of DLBP. Due to the limitation of the number and quality of included studies, the above conclusions need to be validated by more high-quality studies.

[Translated article] Frequency of use of discography findings for the diagnosis of low back pain of discogenic origin. Systematic review of the literature

IntroductionThere are different techniques and interpretations of discography findings to determine it positive for the diagnosis of discogenic pain. This study aims to evaluate the frequency of use of discography findings for the diagnosis of low back pain of discogenic origin. Material and methodsA systematic review of the literature of the last 17 years was performed in MEDLINE and BIREME. A total of 625 articles were identified, 555 were excluded for duplicates, title and abstract. We obtained 70 full texts of which 36 were included in the analysis after excluding 34 for not meeting the inclusion criteria. ResultsAmong the criteria in discography to determine it as positive, 8 studies used only the pain response to the procedure, 28 studies used more than one criterion during discography to consider it as positive, the evaluation of at least one adjacent intervertebral disc with a negative result was necessary in 26 studies to consider a discography as positive. Five studies formally expressed the use of the technique described by SIS/IASP to determine a discography as positive. ConclusionsPain in response to contrast medium injection, assessed with the visual analogue pain scale ≥6, was the most used criterion in the studies included in this review. Although there are already criteria to determine a discography as positive, the use of different techniques and interpretations of discography findings to determine a positive discography for low back pain of discogenic origin persists.

Frecuencia de uso de los hallazgos de la discografía para el diagnóstico del dolor lumbar de origen discogénico. Revisión sistemática de la literatura

IntroductionThere are different techniques and interpretations of discography findings to determine it positive for the diagnosis of discogenic pain. This study aims to evaluate the frequency of use of discography findings for the diagnosis of low back pain of discogenic origin. Material and methodsA systematic review of the literature of the last 17 years was performed in MEDLINE and BIREME. A total of 625 articles were identified, 555 were excluded for duplicates, title and abstract. We obtained 70 full texts of which 36 were included in the analysis after excluding 34 for not meeting the inclusion criteria. ResultsAmong the criteria in discography to determine it as positive, 8 studies used only the pain response to the procedure, 28 studies used more than one criterion during discography to consider it as positive, the evaluation of at least one adjacent intervertebral disc with a negative result was necessary in 26 studies to consider a discography as positive. Five studies formally expressed the use of the technique described by SIS/IASP to determine a discography as positive. ConclusionsPain in response to contrast medium injection, assessed with the visual analog pain scale≥6, was the most used criterion in the studies included in this review. Although there are already criteria to determine a discography as positive, the use of different techniques and interpretations of discography findings to determine a positive discography for low back pain of discogenic origin persists.

Using Percutaneous Endoscopic Outside-In Technique to Treat Selected Patients with Refractory Discogenic Low Back Pain

Background: Controversy is not uncommon in the diagnosis of discogenic low back pain (DLBP) and in the identification of the location of the pain source for the symptomatic disc in patients with DLBP. Various techniques, from minimally invasive procedures to fusion surgery, are used to treat chronic DLBP, but the clinical outcomes are variable. Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy by transforaminal or interlaminar approach is considered to be an effective method to treat DLBP, but the evidence is limited; the lack of clear evidence may be associated with patient selection and surgical technique. Objectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical results of percutaneous endoscopic treatment for annular tear in selected patients with DLBP by using the outside-in technique. Study Design: A prospective study and retrospective observations were performed on 24 consecutive patients with a minimum 2 years of follow-up. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Buddhist Dalin Tzu-Chi General Hospital Foundation (IRB number: 10504004) and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Setting: This research took place within an interventional pain management and spine practice. Methods: Twenty-four consecutive patients with single-level DLBP diagnosed by positive highintensity zone on magnetic resonance imaging, positive provocative discography, and block test underwent a percutaneous endoscopic procedure from January 2014 to December 2015. The transforaminal approach or interlaminar approach was selected according to the location of the annular tear. The torn lesions were visualized directly and treated by puncture and debridement of the inflammatory tissues from the outer annulus fibrosus to the inner nucleus using the outsidein technique. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score were evaluated before and after surgery. The clinical global outcomes were assessed on the basis of modified MacNab criteria. Results: These patients included 13 men and 11 women with a mean age of 43.8 years (range, 32-55 yrs). There were 15 lesion levels at L4/L5 and 9 lesion levels at L5/S1. Among them, 15 levels were accessed by transforaminal approach and 9 levels by interlaminar approach. No serious complications were observed during the follow-up periods. All except 2 patients experienced significant symptomatic and functional improvements at the 2-year follow-up with a success rate of 91.7%. Limitations: Significant limitations include nonrandom format and small sample size. Future research may focus on controlled prospective studies with larger sample sizes and long-term followup to examine the validity of this protocol. Conclusions: The percutaneous endoscopic procedure provides a safe and effective treatment for selected patients with DLBP. The outside-in technique allows the surgeons to visualize and treat the torn or inflammatory lesions directly, and the success rate is high at 2 years follow-up. Key words: Transforaminal, interlaminar, outside-in technique, endoscopic discectomy, discogenic low back pain

Is a History of Severe Episodic Low Back Pain an Indicator of a Discogenic Etiology?

To determine if a history of severe episodic low back pain (LBP) correlates with positive discography. A retrospective chart review identified patients undergoing discography from January 2012 through February 2016. The review determined if the patient's LBP began or continued with severe disabling episodes (lasting a minimum of two days). A gradual onset or initiating event with continuous symptoms was considered a nonepisodic history. Patients were excluded for unclear record, workers' compensation, litigation, prior lumbar surgery, radiologic instability, or indeterminate discography. Seventy-eight patients underwent discography. Thirty-nine patients were included, 31 of which had positive discograms. Eight had negative discograms. Nineteen patients had a history of episodic LBP, and 20 had no history of episodic LBP. Of those 19 with a history of episodic LBP, 18 had positive discography and one had negative discography. Of those with no history of episodic LBP, 13 had positive discography and seven had negative discography. Using the historical finding of severe episodic LBP as a test for discogenic source of LBP, the sensitivity is 58% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 41-75%) and the specificity is 88% (95% CI = 65-100%). The likelihood ratio is 4.7 (95% CI = 0.72-30). The positive predictive value (PPV) is 95% (95% CI = 72-100%). The PPV is based upon a prevalence of 79% (discogram positive) in our sample of patients considering fusion surgery. The diagnostic confidence odds are 18.2, with a diagnostic confidence of 95%. A positive history of severe episodic LBP may be a strong indicator for a discogenic etiology.

Symptomological diagnosis of discogenic low back pain and its neurological anatomic principle

Objective To analyse the symptoms in discogenic low back pain and their neurological anatomic mechanism, and to explore the theoretical basis of symptomatic diagnosis of discogenic low back pain. Methods From January 2010 to December 2013, 289 patients were primarily diagnosed as discogenic discogenic low pain in our department, of which 164 patients showing only single abnormal segment on MRI were enrolled, including 99 male and 65 female patients, averaging 42 years old. All patients underwent discography. All the symptoms conform to the neurological anatomic mechanism of lumbar disc, i.e. extensive low back pain, posterior ilium pain, lateral thigh pain, groin pain, low abdomen pain, were recorded postoperatively. Then the occurrence rate of each symptom with positive discography was calculated. The positive rate (equal to sensitivity of the symptom to the diagnosis of discogenic low pain) of discography when each symptom occurred and the negative rate (equal to specificity of the diagnosis of the symptom to the discogenic low pain) of discography when each symptom did not occur were calculated respectively. Results The discographies of 129 (78.7%) in 164 patients were positive, of these patients 95 (73.6%) had the symptom of extensive low back pain, 99 (76.7%) had posterior ilium pain, 58 (45.0%) had lateral thigh pain, 29 (22.3%) had groin pain, and 24 (18.6%) had low abdomen pain. The positive rate of discography in those with the symptom of extensive low back pain, posterior ilium pain, lateral thigh pain, groin pain and low abdomen pain was 89.6%, 90.8%, 90.6%, 90.6% and 92.3% respectively, i.e. the diagnostic sensitivity to the discogenic low back pain of the symptom of extensive low back pain, posterior ilium pain, lateral thigh pain, groin pain and low abdomen pain was 89.6%, 90.8%, 90.6%, 90.6% and 92.3% respectively. Conclusion The occurrence of the above-mentioned symptoms in the discogenic low back pain is conform to the neurological anatomic mechanism of efferent nerve of lumbar disc. These symptoms have great diagnostic significance for discogenic low back pain. Key words: Intervertebral disc; Low back pain; Diagnosis; Neuroanatomy

ALIF and total disc replacement versus 2-level circumferential fusion with TLIF: a prospective, randomized, clinical and radiological trial.

Prospective, randomized trial. The treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) with two-level fusion has been associated with a reasonable rate of complications. The aim of the present study was to compare (Hybrid) stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) at L5/S1 with total disc replacement at L4/5 (TDR) as an alternative surgical strategy to (Fusion) 2-level circumferential fusion employing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with transpedicular stabilization at L4-S1. A total of 62 patients with symptomatic DDD of segments L5/S1 (Modic ≥2°) and L4/5 (Modic ≤2°; positive discography) were enrolled; 31 were treated with Hybrid and 31 with Fusion. Preoperatively, at 0, 12, and a mean follow-up of 37months, clinical (ODI, VAS) and radiological evaluations (plain/extension-flexion radiographs evaluated for implant failure, fusion, global and segmental lordosis, and ROM) were performed. In 26 of 31 Hybrid and 24 of 31 Fusion patients available at the final follow-up, we found a significant clinical improvement compared to preoperatively. Hybrid patients had significantly lower VAS scores immediately postoperatively and at follow-up compared to Fusion patients. The complication rates were low and similar between the groups. Lumbar lordosis increased in both groups. The increase was mainly located at L4-S1 in the Hybrid group and at L1-L4 in the Fusion group. Hybrid patients presented with increased ROM at L4/5 and L3/4, and Fusion patients presented with increased ROM at L3/4, with significantly greater ROM at L3/4 compared to Hybrid patients at follow-up. Hybrid surgery is a viable surgical alternative for the presented indication. Approach-related inferior trauma and the balanced restoration of lumbar lordosis resulted in superior clinical outcomes compared to two-level circumferential fusion with TLIF.

Analysis of the Correlation Among Age, Disc Morphology, Positive Discography and Prognosis in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.

ObjectiveTo investigate the correlation among age, disc morphology, positive discography, and prognosis in patients with chronic low back pain.MethodsA total of 183 intervertebral discs in 72 patients with chronic low back pain were studied. Discography was performed using a pressure-controlled manometric technique. The pain reaction during discography at each level was recorded as follows: no pain, dissimilar pain, similar pain, or concordant pain. Discs with similar or concordant pain were classified as positive. All the examined discs were assessed morphologically using axial computed tomography imaging. The grade of general degeneration and annular disruption of the discs were assessed according to the Dallas discogram description (DDD). Intradiscal injection of steroid was tried for patients with symptomatic disc identified during provocative discography and who did not consent to surgical operation.ResultsThere was a higher correlation between general degeneration and age, as compared with annular disruption and age. Higher general degeneration and annular disruption grades had higher positive rates of discography. However, annular disruption alone was independently associated with positive discography. Age and grade of general degeneration did not affect the prognosis.ConclusionThe grade of general degeneration was associated with age, but it was not correlated with positive discography and prognosis. In addition, high grade of annular disruption correlated with positive discography.

In Vivo Discography in Degenerate Porcine Spines Revealed Pressure Transfer to Adjacent Discs

In vivo experimental porcine study. To investigate if discography induced pressure increase in adjacent degenerate discs. Despite refinements in the past 2 decades, the validity of discography is debated. Discography in healthy pigs has shown that the pressure increase during disc injection transmits to adjacent discs, a potential source for false positive responses. Degeneration in 1 lumbar disc was induced in 10 pigs by drilling a hole through the endplate. Intradiscal pressure was recorded using a 0.36-mm fiber-optic pressure transducer inserted into nucleus pulposus through a 22-gauge needle. The pressure was measured simultaneously in 2 adjacent discs during slow (0.03 mL/s) automated contrast injection into 1 of the discs up to 8 bar (116 psi). Ten adjacent discs were prefilled with contrast from previous discogram. A pressure increase 2 psi or more above baseline was defined as increased pressure in adjacent discs. Pressure was recorded until 15 minutes after injection. A total of 28 discograms were successfully performed. A pressure increase during injection was detected in 57% (16) of the 28 adjacent discs with mean 3.2 psi (1.7-8.2; standard deviation, 1.8), corresponding to a mean increase above baseline of 11%. Of those 16 adjacent discs, 4 were nondegenerate and 12 degenerate, of which 7 were prefilled. Fifteen minutes after injection, 89% of adjacent discs displayed increase in pressure of mean 14% above baseline. Discography induced pressure increase in adjacent discs in a degenerate disc model, something not reported earlier. If present, also in human spine pressure transmission, may be a potential cause for false positive discography responses.

Clinical and radiological association with positive lumbar discography in patients with chronic low back pain

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.Objectives: To find out (1) if magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings associated with positive discography in patients with lumbar discogenic pain are caused by degenerative disc disease (DDD). (2) If clinical risk factors associated with positive discography in patients with lumbar discogenic pain are caused by DDD.Methods: Thirty-three discographies were performed in 20 consecutive patients with chronic low back pain (LBP). All examinations were performed in the lumbar spine between L3 and S1. Patient assessment consisted of a clinical and radiological examination through a protocol that contained data on the history, visual analogue scale for pain (VAS), functional questionnaire (Oswestry), and MRI findings. Discography was considered positive using the Walsh's criteria. We examined the association between MRI and clinical findings with positive discography using logistic regression.Results: Fourteen discographies (42%) were positive and 19 (58%) were negative. The mean age of patients with positive discography was 40.7 years (range, 25–56 years) and negative discography 43.1 years (range, 30–55 years). Men had a positive discography rate of 43.5% and women 40%. Patients with LBP had reduced odds of a positive discography compared with those with LBP and sciatica (OR = .5; 95% CI: 0.1–2.7); however, this association was not statistically significant. Patients with more than four previous episodes of pain versus patients with one to four episodes had greater odds of a positive discography (OR = 3.8; 95% CI: 0.07–184); but this association was not statistically significant. Patients with various pathologies on MRI had greater odds of a positive discography; however, these associations were not statistically significant either.Conclusions: Patients with a chief complaint of LBP associated with sciatica, with more than four episodes of previous LBP exacerbations and the presence of a high intensity zone (HIZ) on MRI have a higher rate of positive discography. These findings are not statistically significant, probably due to a small sample size. During discography, we found the end point resistance to be more prevalent in asymptomatic discs.

In Vivo Intervertebral Disc Characterization Using Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and T1ρ Imaging

An in vivo study of intervertebral disc degeneration by using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). To quantify water and proteoglycan (PG) content in the intervertebral disc by using in vivo MRS and to evaluate the relationship between MRS-quantified water/PG content, T1ρ, Pfirrmann score, clinical self-assessment, and discography. Previous in vitro studies have investigated the relationship between MRS-quantified water/PG content and degenerative grade by using cadaveric intervertebral discs. T1ρ has been shown to relate to Pfirrmann grade and clinical self-assessment. However, the associations between MRS-quantified water/PG content, MRI-based T1ρ, self-assessment of health status, and clinical response to discography have not been studied in vivo. MRS and MRI were performed in 26 patients (70 discs) with symptomatic intervertebral degenerative disc (IVDD) and 23 controls (41 discs). Patients underwent evaluation of intervertebral discs with provocative discography. All subjects completed the Short Form-36 Health Survey and Oswestry Disability Index questionnaires. The water/PG peak area ratio was significantly elevated in (a) patients (compared with controls) and in (b) discs with positive discography (compared with negative discography). Magnetic resonance (MR) T1ρ exhibited similar trends. A significant association was found between T1ρ and normalized PG content (R = 0.61, P < 0.05) but not between T1ρ and normalized water content (R = 0.24, P > 0.05). The water/PG peak area ratio, normalized water, normalized PG, and Pfirrmann grade were significantly associated with patient self-assessment of disability and physical composite score, while disc height was not. This study demonstrated a relationship between in vivo MRS spectroscopy (water content and PG content), imaging parameters (T1ρ and Pfirrmann grade), discography results, and clinical self-assessment, suggesting that MRS-quantified water, PG, and MR T1ρ relaxation time may potentially serve as biomarkers of symptomatic IVDD.

6-Month Results of Transdiscal Biacuplasty on Patients with Discogenic Low Back Pain: Preliminary Findings

Prospective observational study. Our aim is to investigate the efficacy and safety of TransDiscal Biacuplasty. Chronic discogenic pain is one of the leading causes of low back pain; however, the condition is not helped by most non-invasive methods. The results of major surgical operations for these patients are unsatisfactory. Recently, attention has shifted to disk heating methods for treatment. TransDiscal Biacuplasty is one of the minimally invasive treatment methods. The method was developed as an alternative to spinal surgical practices and Intradiscal Electrothermal Therapy for treatment of patients with chronic discogenic pain. The candidates for this study were patients with chronic discogenic pain that did not respond to conservative treatment. The main criteria for inclusion were: the existence of axial low back pain present for 6 months; disc degeneration or internal disc disruption at a minimum of one level, and maximum of two levels, in MR imaging; and positive discography. Physical function was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index when measuring the pain with VAS. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using a 4-grade scale. Follow-ups were made 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. 15 patients were treated at one or two levels. The mean patient age was 43.1 ± 9.2 years. We found the mean symptom duration to be 40.5 ± 45.7 months. At the sixth month, 57.1% of patients reported a 50% or more reduction in pain, while 78.6% of patients reported a reduction of at least two points in their VAS values. In the final check, 78.6% of patients reported a 10-point improvement in their Oswestry Disability scores compared to the initial values. No complications were observed in any of the patients. TransDiscal Biacuplasty is an effective and safe method.

Intradiscal injection therapy for degenerative chronic discogenic low back pain with end plate Modic changes

Background context The effect of intradiscal steroid therapy for patients with degenerative chronic discogenic low back pain remains an issue of debate. Purpose To evaluate the effect of various intradiscal injection regimens for patients with degenerative chronic discogenic low back pain and end plate Modic changes. Study design Double-blind, randomized, controlled, prospective clinical study. Patient sample One hundred twenty patients with discogenic low back pain and end plate Modic changes on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) who received discography but were unwilling to accept surgical operation. Outcome measures Pain and function were determined by the visual analog scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) assessment. Methods Patients who received diagnostic discography for suspected degenerative discogenic low back pain were recruited. A total of 120 patients with positive discography and end plate Modic changes at a single level were enrolled in the study and allocated into Groups A and B according to the type of Modic changes on MRI. Then, the patients in Groups A and B were randomized into three subgroups, respectively. Intradiscal injection of normal saline was performed in Subgroups A1 and B1, intradiscal injection of diprospan was performed in Subgroups A2 and B2, and intradiscal injection of a mixed solution of diprospan+songmeile (cervus and cucumis polypeptide) was performed in Subgroups A3 and B3. The clinical outcome of each patient was evaluated and recorded by using the VAS and ODI at 3 and 6 months after the procedure. Results The subgroups were comparable with respect to gender, age, pain, and percentage disability. Neither VAS pain scores nor Oswestry function scores of the patients within Group A had any improvement at 3 or 6 months after saline injection, but both of them improved significantly at the two time points after diprospan and diprospan+songmeile injection, respectively. Meanwhile, the latter two injection protocols led to no significant difference in pain relief and functional recovery. Similar results were obtained in patients within Group B. Furthermore, no difference of the improvement of VAS pain scores or Oswestry function scores was found between the patients within Group A and within Group B at different time points after various interventions. Conclusion Intradiscal injection of corticosteroids could be a short-term efficient alternative for discogenic low back pain patients with end plate Modic changes on MRI who were still unwilling to accept surgical operation when conservative treatment failed.

A special type of discogenic low back pain: normal signal intensity of magnetic resonance imaging with abnormal discography

To report a group of special patients showing a normal signal intensity of MRI with a positive discography and discuss its pathogenesis and clinical significance. From August 2003 to November 2008, 288 patients with chronic low back pain were treated. Of these patients, 12 showed a normal intensity signal of MRI in lumbar intervertebral discs with a positive discography. There were 7 males and 5 females aged 20 - 44 years with an average of 29.6 years. The duration of disease was 8 months to 3 years with an average of 1.8 years. Dallas CT grading method was used for assessing the degree of annular disruption. Of these 12 patients, 33 lumbar discs underwent discography. Twelve discs in 12 patients showed annular disruption and low back pain reproduction. Among 12 painful discs, 3 showed grade 2 annular disruption and 9 showed grade 3 annular disruption. Patients who are refractory to conservative care and have normal signal intensity in lumbar disc MRI and who are suggested as discogenic origin and might need further treatment such as minimal invasive surgery or lumbar interbody fusion should still be examined by discography.

Can magnetic resonance imaging accurately predict concordant pain provocation during provocative disc injection?

To correlate magnetic resonance (MR) image findings with pain response by provocation discography in patients with discogenic low back pain, with an emphasis on the combination analysis of a high intensity zone (HIZ) and disc contour abnormalities. Sixty-two patients (aged 17-68 years) with axial low back pain that was likely to be disc related underwent lumbar discography (178 discs tested). The MR images were evaluated for disc degeneration, disc contour abnormalities, HIZ, and endplate abnormalities. Based on the combination of an HIZ and disc contour abnormalities, four classes were determined: (1) normal or bulging disc without HIZ; (2) normal or bulging disc with HIZ; (3) disc protrusion without HIZ; (4) disc protrusion with HIZ. These MR image findings and a new combined MR classification were analyzed in the base of concordant pain determined by discography. Disc protrusion with HIZ [sensitivity 45.5%; specificity 97.8%; positive predictive value (PPV), 87.0%] correlated significantly with concordant pain provocation (P < 0.01). A normal or bulging disc with HIZ was not associated with reproduction of pain. Disc degeneration (sensitivity 95.4%; specificity 38.8%; PPV 33.9%), disc protrusion (sensitivity 68.2%; specificity 80.6%; PPV 53.6%), and HIZ (sensitivity 56.8%; specificity 83.6%; PPV 53.2%) were not helpful in the identification of a disc with concordant pain. The proposed MR classification is useful to predict a disc with concordant pain. Disc protrusion with HIZ on MR imaging predicted positive discography in patients with discogenic low back pain.

The relationship between discography pressure and outcome of anterior lumbar interbody fusion for discogenic low back pain.

Objective To explore the relationship between discography pressure and outcome of an-terior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) for discogenic low back pain. Methods From April 2004 to June 2006, 65 patients with chronic low back pain were identified as diseogenic origin by pressure controlled discography, 22 cases of which received ALIF after failed conservative treatment for at least 6 months. The surgically treated patients aged 43.6 on the average (range, 25-67). The treated discs located: 8 in L4-5, 12 in L5S1, 2 in both L4-5 and L5S1. 22 cases received ALIF in 24 levels via retroperitoneal approach. The pressure as soon as accordant initially induced pain was recorded during discography. Low pressure (pressure ≤ 300kPa) in 10 cases and high pressure (pressure 300-500 kPa) in 12 cases. At 3 days postoperative, the patients were allowed to leave bed with a brace, and the brace should be used for 3 months. Results All the cases were followed up for average 18 months (range, 6-26 months). At the end of follow-up all the patients recov-ered normal social life and work without any symptoms. Disc height increased from 9.5 mm preoperatively to 13.5 mm postoperatively. Surgery time averaged 90 rain (70-120 rain); blood loss averaged 220 ml (100-400ml). Low pressure group and high pressure group showed no significant different in VAS, ODI, disc height,surgery time and blood loss preoperatively. At 6 months follow up, VAS and ODI improve rates of low pres-sure group account for 82.4% and 90.1% respectively; and those of high pressure group account for 71.7%and 80.6% respectively. No ileus, retrograde ejaculation nor artificial disc translation was noticed during fol-low-up. Conclusion Pressure-controlled discography can increase the diagnostic accuracy of discogenic lowback pain, and a positive discography on low pressure indicates better surgical outcome. Key words: Lumbar vertebrae; Intervertebral disk; Pain; Pressure

Analysis of the relationship between morphology of intervertebral disc and some correlated factors following discography in patients with chronic low back pain

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic effectiveness of discography in discogenic low back pain (LBP). Methods: Ninety-six cases of chronic LBP with or without referred thigh pain were enrolled in this study. All these cases received CT scan following discography once conservative treatment for at least 6 months had failed. There were 42 men and 54 women, aged from 24 to 67 years (average 46.4). Discography was performed on 218 discs. The positive discs were classified morphologically according to the Dallas Discogram Description (DDD). Results: (i) The 56 cases (58.3%) which were positive on discography were divided into two subgroups of age less or more than 50 years. Positive rates for the two subgroups were 33.3% and 66.7%, respectively; (ii) one hundred and twenty-two discs, of which 62 (50.8%) were positive on discography, showed morphologic abnormality, whereas all the discography positive discs showed morphologic abnormality. No complication related to discography was found in any case. Conclusion: (i) Compared with the younger patients, older LBP patients have a lower positive rate of discography despite the presence of more serious degenerative disc changes; (ii) outer layer disruption of the annulus fibrous correlates with positive discography; (iii) MRI intensity changes are not specific in diagnosing discogenic pain. Additional discography is needed to identify the painful disc; and (iv) the contrast volume injected into discs can be affected by a variety of factors which restrict its diagnostic value.

Analysis of the relationship between morphology of intervertebral disc and some correlated factors following discography in patients with chronic low back pain

To evaluate the diagnostic effectiveness of discography in discogenic low back pain (LBP). Ninety-six cases of chronic LBP with or without referred thigh pain were enrolled in this study. All these cases received CT scan following discography once conservative treatment for at least 6 months had failed. There were 42 men and 54 women, aged from 24 to 67 years (average 46.4). Discography was performed on 218 discs. The positive discs were classified morphologically according to the Dallas Discogram Description (DDD). (i) The 56 cases (58.3%) which were positive on discography were divided into two subgroups of age less or more than 50 years. Positive rates for the two subgroups were 33.3% and 66.7%, respectively; (ii) one hundred and twenty-two discs, of which 62 (50.8%) were positive on discography, showed morphologic abnormality, whereas all the discography positive discs showed morphologic abnormality. No complication related to discography was found in any case. (i) Compared with the younger patients, older LBP patients have a lower positive rate of discography despite the presence of more serious degenerative disc changes; (ii) outer layer disruption of the annulus fibrous correlates with positive discography; (iii) MRI intensity changes are not specific in diagnosing discogenic pain. Additional discography is needed to identify the painful disc; and (iv) the contrast volume injected into discs can be affected by a variety of factors which restrict its diagnostic value.

Psychophysical Measurements During Lumbar Discography

Prospective clinical data analysis. To determine if heart rate (HR) response correlates with positive discography results. Lumbar discography is a controversial tool for the diagnosis of discogenic low back pain. The subjective nature of discography can make data interpretation difficult, leading to false-positive and false-negative results. HR changes have been found in numerous studies to be a reliable and valid indicator of acute pain. To date, there is no study analyzing the HR response to discography-induced pain. The HR measurements were recorded immediately preceding and after contrast injection into the each disc, and statistically correlated with the provocation of concordant pain, nonconcordant pain, and nonpainful discs. Discography was performed in 26 subjects with low back pain. Among 75 discograms, 26 discs elicited concordant pain, 9 provoked nonconcordant pain, and 40 elicited no pain response. There was no significant change in HR during disc stimulation for negative [no pain response (P=0.19) and nonconcordant (P=0.26)] discograms, whereas positive discograms [concordant pain (numerical rating scale> or =6/10)] were associated with a statistically significant increase in HR (P=0.000002). Lumbar discography induces positive HR response only in positive discograms. Although there is no immediate practical application of these results, 2 implications may deserve future research: (a) correlation of HR response with surgical and intradiscal electrotherapy treatment outcomes; (b) evaluation of HR measurement in cases of false-positive results (concordant pain on discography but no HR response).

MRI and discography in traumatic intervertebral disc lesions

In this study we evaluated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in trauma patients for assessing traumatised adjacent discs of fractured vertebrae before dorsoventral stabilisation. In a prospective study, MRI of 54 discs was performed with a 1.5-T MRI unit. The preoperative MRI with sagittal T1-W-SE and T2-W-TSE was compared to intraoperative discography, which was carried out on both intervertebral discs adjacent to the fractured vertebrae. Signal alterations, morphological changes in the adjacent discs, fractured vertebrae and associated ligament injuries were evaluated. In 47/54 (87%) of the intervertebral discs, the results of both imaging findings were concordant. The discs adjoining vertebral fractures were normal in 18 cases. Regarding the positive concordant imaging findings, MRI and discography revealed traumatised adjacent cranial and caudal discs in 22 discs. In 7 cases, only the cranial adjacent disc was affected. Moreover, 17 cases of intradiscal bleeding, 13 intraosseous herniations into the fractured vertebrae and 20 anuluar tears were visualised in MRI. Associated ligament injuries were detected in 18 cases. Findings were discordant in eight discs. In six discs, MRI was abnormal, demonstrating signal alterations suggestive of positive imaging findings, whereas discography demonstrated no disc injury. MRI failed to detect disc injury in two discs, whereas discography was positive, showing an irregular intradiscal contrast media distribution. MRI, as a non-invasive method for assessing fractures of the thoraco-lumbar spine, may detect traumatised adjacent intervertebral discs. MRI is superior to intraoperative discography. The performance of MRI of the thoraco-lumbar spine is recommended before dorsoventral stabilisation in trauma patients, as it can reveal additional preoperative information such as fractures, disc and associated ligament injuries.