All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.•Type of peer review: Single-blind•Conference submission management system: e-mail of workshop mhd2021@sscc.ru•Number of submissions received: 32•Number of submissions sent for review: 32•Number of submissions accepted: 30•Acceptance Rate: 93•Average number of reviews per paper: 3•Total number of reviewers involved: 40•Any additional info on review process: The process of consideration and acceptance of an article in the workshop proceedings is carried out within 50 days according to the following scheme:1. the abstract of the article in a free format is sent to the mail of the workshop before the deadline for submitting the abstracts;2. each abstract is reviewed by at least one member of the program committee within 10 days for compliance with the topic of the workshop, relevance and novelty of the results;3. based on the results of consideration of the abstracts, a decision made to include the report in the conference program and an invitation of the authors for publication in the conference proceedings or a decision to reject the report is made;4. the full text of the article in the IOP Publishing format is sent to the mail of the workshop before the deadline for submission of articles, after which the article is considered, corrected and a decision of publication of the article within 30 days according to the scheme below is made;5. the article is preliminarily reviewed by one of the editors of the workshop proceedings for compliance with technical criteria, intersection with previously published articles and preprints of the authors, novelty and relevance of the results, after which he decides to appoint a reviewer (leader in this direction), or decides to reject the article;6. the reviewer considers the article in terms of the relevance, scientific novelty, significance of the results, the quality of the presentation of the results, the review of the topic, the intersection with previously published articles and preprints of the authors, conclusions on the article are assessed;7. based on the reviewer’s opinion, a decision on the expediency of further consideration of the article for publication or a decision of the article rejection in case of a negative review is made;8.with a simultaneous positive decision of the editor and the reviewer, comments on the submitted article are sent to the authors, after which the article is corrected by them until all comments are considered;9.after eliminating all the comments, the article is recommended for publication.Thus, when preparing a publication, the work is considered by at least three reviewers: on the stage of submitting the abstract of the article, consideration of the article by the editor and reviewer. The work can be rejected at any stage. The article is recommended for publication only with a positive decision at all stages.•Contact person for queries: Name: Dr. of Sc. Kulikov IgorAffiliation: ICMMG SB RAS, Novosibirsk Email: kulikov@ssd.sscc.ru