Abstract Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) colitis is a serious concern worsening the prognosis of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) as an independent risk factor for hospitalization and surgery. European guidelines indicate that immunohistochemistry [IHC], tissue polymerase chain reaction [PCR], or possibly both, are essential for confirming active CMV colitis in IBD and should be considered as standard tests. The aim of our study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of different tests used for diagnosis of CMV infection in comparison with the gold standard in hospitalized patients for UC flare. Methods We prospectively included consecutive UC patients hospitalized for a UC flare since March 2024. UC activity was assessed according to the Truelove&Witts score together with CMV-DNA PCR on blood, stool, tissue and IHC on colonic biopsies were all performed within 5 days from admission. Demographic data, history of medications, lab test at admission were collected for every patient. Patients were treated for UC according to guidelines; in case of CMV positivity on IHC or tissue CMV PCR > 250 cp/mg (qPCR) they received either ganciclovir or vanganciclovir if useful according to investigators. We registered clinical remission and need of surgery within 30-days from hospitalization. Results In this interim analysis we collected data on 51 patients. Of these, 70.6% were admitted with severe UC according to the Truelove&Witts score, with a median endoscopic Mayo score of 3, and 49% of the patients were steroid-refractory at hospital admission. 63% of patients achieved clinical remission 30 days after admission, whereas 37% did not show signs of response, including 4 patients who needed surgery within this time frame. In our cohort 16/51patients (31.4%) were diagnosed with CMV colitis according to IHC or qPCR > 250 cp/mg, while only 3/51 patients (5.8%) confirmed the diagnosis according to IHC criteria. Only 8 patients received antiviral treatment; in the remaining 8 cases antiviral treatment was not indicated due to lack of presumed clinical benefit. Blood positive CMV-DNA was found in 8 patients; among them 5 were confirmed with CMV colitis. Only 3 patients tested positive for stool CMV-DNA, however all of them received a subsequent confirmation of CMV colitis. Conclusion Concordance between diagnostic criteria (qPCR vs IHC criteria) was low confirming the unreliability of currently accepted diagnostic test. Preliminary data about alternative sources of CMV DNA testing looks promising and more reliable. Further data are needed to attain definite conclusions.
Read full abstract