This paper describes a computer program which generates all possible anagrams from any five-letter solution word and which also computes a number of frequently employed predictors of problem difficulty for each anagram. The following discussion outlines these indices and their derivations. For the most part, anagram researchers utilize fiveletter problems considered to be composed of four successive bigrams that correspond to the pairs of letters found in positions 1-2, 2-3, 34, and 4-5 of the letter string. The anagram HICAR, for example, is composed of the bigrams HI, IC, CA, and AR; the respective bigrams of its solution word, CHAIR, are CH, HA, AI, and IR. The relative frequency with which any bigram occurs in English is known as its transitional probability (TP), and the TPs of all possible bigrams have been estimated in tables prepared by Mayzner and Tresselt (1965) and Underwood and Schulz (1960). The former table yields a more sensitive measure of bigram frequency since each TP value is estimated as a function both of the word length (WL) and of the letter position of the bigram (LP). As a result, the same bigram takes on different values when it appears in different-length letter strings or in different positions of a string of given length. For example, the Mayzner-Tresselt TP is 40 for CH as the first bigram in a five-letter string (e.g., CHAIR), but the TP is 126 for the same bigram when it is in the last two letter positions in a five-letter string and the TP is 7 for the same bigram in the last position of a six-letter string (e.g., CHURCH). The Underwood-Schulz values, on the other hand, make no adjustment for WL or LP, and thus the same TP value is assigned to CH in each of the three situations above. Both TP computations, however, are used in anagram research and are frequently cited in the literature. The TP index most often used to assess or control problem difficulty is obtained by adding the bigram frequencies of the four successive letter pairs (summed TP) in the anagram or in the solution word. For example, the four bigram frequencies of HICAR (5, 5, 10, 13) yield a summed TP of 33, while the summed TP of its solution word, CHAIR (40, 33, 40, 73), is 186. Two related indices that have proved useful in predicting problem difficulty (Gavurin, Note 1) are the transitional probability difference (TPD) and the transitional probability ratio (TPR). The former is obtained by subtracting the summed TP for the anagram f~om the summed TP for the solution word. The latter 1S calculated by dividing the solution word summed TP by the anagram summed TP. Using the bigram TPs presented above for HICAR, the TPD is 153 (186 33 = 153) and the TPR is 3.636 (186/33 = 3.636). Recently, Mendelsohn and O'Brien (1974) developed a TP predictor of anagram difficulty in the form o~ a bigram rank measure. This index is obtained by counting the number of bigrams, in the pool of all bigrams formed by the solution word letters, that exceed in TP value the solution word bigrams. The Mayzner-Tresselt values are used in this index. For example, a total of 20 different bigrams can be formed from the letters of the word CHAIR. Table 1 presents these bigrams and their TP values in each of the four letter positions. Using Table 1, the number of bigram TP values that exceed CH in LP 1-2 is 10. Similarly, for HA in LP 2-3, AI in LP 34, and IR in LP 4-5, the number of higher values are 11, 10, and 4, respectively. The four ranks when added together yield a value of 35, which represents the Mendelsohn-O'Brien summed rank index for the solution word CHAIR. A factor unrelated to TP that also affects anagram difficulty is letter order. Easy letter orders more closely approximate the solution word in that a minimal number of letter moves are necessary to achieve solution. Thus, if the solution word (e.g., CHAIR) letter order is considered to be 12345, an easy letter order would be 12435 (CHIAR) and a hard letter order would be 52413 (RHICA).