Portal Vein Embolization Research Articles

A review of portal vein embolization prior to hepatic resection.

Primary and metastatic liver cancers are increasing in incidence, and the approaches with the longest survival are resection and transplantation. Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is the leading cause of mortality following liver resection. PHLF is largely due to liver insufficiency due to the insufficient size of the future liver remnant (FLR). In this review, we will describe portal vein embolization, which is a neoadjuvant therapy used to induce hypertrophy in the FLR before resection.

Advancements in Interventional Radiology for Managing Hepatic Encephalopathy: A Comprehensive Review.

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a complex neuropsychiatric syndrome resulting from liver dysfunction, leading to cognitive, behavioral, and motor impairments. The management of HE has traditionally relied on pharmacological treatments, dietary modifications, and liver transplantation. However, recent advancements in interventional radiology (IR) have introduced minimally invasive procedures that offer promising alternatives. This comprehensive review explores the latest IR techniques, including transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO), portal vein embolization (PVE), and Yttrium-90 (Y90) radioembolization. The efficacy, clinical outcomes, and potential complications of these techniques are examined through an analysis of current studies and trials. The review highlights the benefits of IR in reducing portal hypertension and improving hepatic blood flow, ultimately alleviating HE symptoms. Additionally, it underscores the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration, ongoing research, and the development of clear patient selection criteria to optimize the use of IR in HE management. By integrating these advancements into clinical practice, healthcare providers can enhance the quality of care and improve outcomes for patients with HE.

CIRSE Standards of Practice on Portal Vein Embolization and Double Vein Embolization/Liver Venous Deprivation

This CIRSE Standards of Practice document is aimed at interventional radiologists and provides best practices for performing liver regeneration therapies prior to major hepatectomies, including portal vein embolization, double vein embolization and liver venous deprivation. It has been developed by an expert writing group under the guidance of the CIRSE Standards of Practice Committee. It encompasses all clinical and technical details required to perform liver regeneration therapies, revising the indications, contra-indications, outcome measures assessed, technique and expected outcomes.

Hepatic infarction occurred after 125I particle stent treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: A case report

BackgroundHepatic infarction is a rare liver condition. The purpose of this study is to report a case of hepatic infarction caused by thrombus formation following portal vein stent implantation in a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumor thrombus, and to explore the underlying causes.Case reportThe patient in this study was a 52-year-old male admitted with diffuse hepatocellular carcinoma involving the right lobe and portal vein tumor thrombus. After undergoing portal vein stent implantation and 125I particle strand implantation treatment, the portal vein was patent, and the pressure decreased. However, multiple instances of hepatic artery chemoembolization combined with targeted immunotherapy resulted in gradual reduction in the diameter of the hepatic artery and affecting hepatic arterial blood flow. Two months post-stent implantation, thrombus formation within the stent was noted, and the patient’s condition did not improve with anticoagulant therapy, as evidenced by follow-up CT scans showing an increase in thrombi. Six months later, the patient suffered from gastrointestinal bleeding and, despite emergency esophagogastric variceal ligation and hemostatic treatment, developed hepatic parenchymal infarction and liver function failure.ConclusionsWe reveal the underlying cause is that (1) thrombus formation within the portal vein stent, leading to portal vein embolism and obstructed blood flow due to exacerbate portal hypertension after various treatments; and (2) the effect of hepatic artery chemoembolization, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy on tumor angiogenesis, causing reduced hepatic artery diameter and impaired arterial blood flow. These factors disrupt the liver’s dual blood supply system, ultimately contributing to hepatic infarction. To our knowledge, this is the first report of hepatic infarction as a complication following portal vein stent implantation for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus, and it holds significant reference value for guiding the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with concurrent portal vein tumor thrombus in a clinical setting.

Evaluation of two-stage hepatectomy using portal vein embolization for colorectal liver metastasis: a retrospective nationwide cohort survey in Japan.

Two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) enables patients to undergo surgery for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) which one-stage hepatectomy cannot remove. Although the outcome of TSH has been reported, there is no original report from Japan. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the outcome of TSH in Japanese patients with CRLM. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the nationwide database that included clinical information of 12,519 patients treated with CRLM between 2005 and 2017 in Japan. The primary outcome measure was overall survival. The second outcome measure was progression-free survival. Fisher's exact test, chi-squared test and Mann-Whitney U test were conducted to examine an intergroup difference. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox regression model. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Of the database, 53 patients undergoing TSH using portal vein embolization (PVE) were identified and analyzed. Their morbidity and in-hospital mortality rate at the second hepatectomy were 26.4% and 0.0%. The mean observation period was 21.8 months. The estimated 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rate were 92.5%, 70.8% and 34.7%. Multivariate analyses showed that more than 10 liver nodules significantly increased the mortality risk by 4.2-fold (95%CI 1.224-14.99, P= 0.023). Survival analysis revealed that repeat hepatectomy for disease progression after TSH was superior to chemotherapy in overall survival (mean: 49.6 vs. 18.7, months, P= 0.004). In the Japanese cohort, TSH was confirmed to be a safety procedure with acceptable survival outcome. More than 10 liver nodules may be a predictor for unfavorable outcome of patients with CRLM undergoing TSH. Furthermore, repeat hepatectomy can be a salvage treatment for resectable intrahepatic recurrence after TSH.

Laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma following conversion therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

e16272 Background: Conversion therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has emerged as a novel strategy allowing patients with previously unresectable HCC to transition to a resectable disease through a combination of therapies. Laparoscopic hepatectomy is associated with reduced blood loss and early recovery without compromising oncological results in cirrhotic patients. However, the specific benefits of laparoscopic hepatectomy in patients who have undergone conversion therapy are not clear. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central for any studies that compared laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy after the use of conversion therapy (transarterial chemoembolization, portal vein embolization, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, or liver ablation) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. The outcomes of interest were length of hospital stay, blood loss, operative time, pedicle clamping, postoperative complications, and transfusion. Statistical analysis was performed using R statistical software 4.2.1. Heterogeneity was assessed with I². Results: We included 535 patients from 4 retrospective nonrandomized studies. The mean age in the laparoscopic group was 60.33, ranging from 29 to 83. Length of hospital stay was significantly reduced in the laparoscopic group (MD -5.01; 95% CI -9.76–-0.27; p = 0.04; I² = 92%), as well as the blood loss (MD -97.26; 95% CI -200.54–6.01; p = 0.06; I² = 76%). Postoperative complications also favored the laparoscopic group (OR 0.40; 95% CI 0.17–0.94; p = 0.035; I² = 0%). The endpoints of pedicle clamping (OR 0.7; 95% CI 0.11–4.36; p = 0.70; I² = 91%), transfusion (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.36–1.33; p = 0.273; I² = 0%), and operative time (MD 34.21; 95% CI -36.68–105.10; p = 0.34; I² = 97%) did not favor any of the groups. Conclusions: In this meta-analysis, laparoscopic hepatectomy after conversion therapy was proven to be safe and feasible, without significant differences compared to open hepatectomy regarding pedicle clamping, transfusion, and operative time. Furthermore, the laparoscopic group presented less blood loss and a significantly reduced length of hospital stay. These findings suggest that laparoscopic resection could be safely used after conversion therapy and may improve surgical outcomes in these patients.

Meta-Analysis on the Therapeutic Effect of Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Combined with Portal Vein Embolization.

The aim of the study was to conduct a systematic review to explore the therapeutic effect of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with portal vein embolization (PVE) for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Chinese and English databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang database, and VIP database) were searched from database inception to August 15, 2023. Studies comparing TACE combined with PVE versus TACE alone for patients with HCC were included. The degree of heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics and a Q test. The effect size was represented by risk ratio and mean difference (MD), and the effect size range was estimated using a 95% confidence interval (CI). Eight eligible studies were included in the systematic review, involving 689 participants. The results showed that the future liver residual (FLR) of patients treated with TACE combined with PVE was significantly higher than that of those treated with PVE alone (MD = 3.99%; 95% CI: 1.03-6.94). Furthermore, compared with PVE alone, TACE combined with PVE had a positive effect on disease-free survival (odds ratio [OR] = 2.16; 95% CI: 1.20-3.88), recurrence rate (OR = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.07-9.42), and complications (OR = 0.53; 95% CI: 0.30-0.96). There was no statistically significant impact on mortality with TACE combined with PVE treatment. The combination of TACE with PVE can significantly reduce the FLR of patients with HCC, with higher disease-free survival, lower recurrence rate, and fewer complications.

Assessment of Segmentary Hypertrophy of Future Remnant Liver after Liver Venous Deprivation: A Single-Center Study.

Background: Liver venous deprivation (LVD) is a recent radiological technique that has shown promising results on Future Remnant Liver (FRL) hypertrophy. The aim of this retrospective study is to compare the segmentary hypertrophy of the FRL after LVD and after portal vein embolization (PVE). Methods: Patients undergoing PVE or LVD between April 2015 and April 2020 were included. The segmentary volumes (seg 4, seg2+3 and seg1) were assessed before and after the radiological procedure. Results: Forty-four patients were included: 26 undergoing PVE, 10 LVD and 8 eLVD. Volume gain of both segment 1 and segments 2+3 was significantly higher after LVD and eLVD than after PVE (segment 1: 27.33 ± 35.37 after PVE vs. 38.73% ± 13.47 after LVD and 79.13% ± 41.23 after eLVD, p = 0.0080; segments 2+3: 40.73% ± 40.53 after PVE vs. 45.02% ± 21.53 after LVD and 85.49% ± 45.51 after eLVD, p = 0.0137), while this was not true for segment 4. FRL hypertrophy was confirmed to be higher after LVD and eLVD than after PVE (33.53% ± 21.22 vs. 68.63% ± 42.03 vs. 28.11% ± 28.33, respectively, p = 0.0280). Conclusions: LVD and eLVD may induce greater hypertrophy of segment 1 and segments 2+3 when compared to PVE.

Transfemoral hepatic vein catheterization reduces procedure time in double vein embolization

BackgroundDouble vein embolization with simultaneous embolization of the portal and hepatic vein aims to grow the future liver remnant in preparation for major hepatectomy. Transvenous hepatic vein embolization is usually done via a transjugular access. The purpose of this study is to describe the transfemoral approach as an alternative option and to discuss potential advantages.ResultsTwenty-three patients undergoing hepatic vein embolization via a transjugular (n = 10) or transfemoral access (n = 13) were evaluated retrospectively. In all cases the portal vein embolization was done first. All procedures were technically successful. There were no peri-interventional complications. Only two patients were not able to proceed to surgery. Standardized future liver remnant hypertrophy was non-inferior with the transfemoral approach compared to the transjugular route. Procedure time was significantly shorter in the transfemoral access group (40 ± 13 min) compared to the transjugular group (67 ± 13 min, p < 0.001).ConclusionTransfemoral hepatic vein embolization is feasible, safe, and faster due to easier catheterization, improved stability, and simpler patient preparation. These findings will need to be validated in larger studies.

Cholangiocarcinoma: The Current Status of Surgical Options including Liver Transplantation.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) poses a substantial threat as it ranks as the second most prevalent primary liver tumor. The documented annual rise in intrahepatic CCA (iCCA) incidence in the United States is concerning, indicating its growing impact. Moreover, the five-year survival rate after tumor resection is only 25%, given that tumor recurrence is the leading cause of death in 53-79% of patients. Pre-operative assessments for iCCA focus on pinpointing tumor location, biliary tract involvement, vascular encasements, and metastasis detection. Numerous studies have revealed that portal vein embolization (PVE) is linked to enhanced survival rates, improved liver synthetic functions, and decreased overall mortality. The challenge in achieving clear resection margins contributes to the notable recurrence rate of iCCA, affecting approximately two-thirds of cases within one year, and results in a median survival of less than 12 months for recurrent cases. Nearly 50% of patients initially considered eligible for surgical resection in iCCA cases are ultimately deemed ineligible during surgical exploration. Therefore, staging laparoscopy has been proposed to reduce unnecessary laparotomy. Eligibility for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) requires certain criteria to be granted. OLT offers survival advantages for early-detected unresectable iCCA; it can be combined with other treatments, such as radiofrequency ablation and transarterial chemoembolization, in specific cases. We aim to comprehensively describe the surgical strategies available for treating CCA, including the preoperative measures and interventions, alongside the current options regarding liver resection and OLT.

Preliminary Results from the International Registry on Liver Venous Deprivation (EuroLVD)

Abstract Background Liver venous deprivation (LVD) is a recently developed method to reach maximal liver hypertrophy before major hepatectomy. LVD combines simultaneous portal and ipsilateral hepatic vein embolization. An international registry was created in 2021. Aims This study aimed to describe the outcomes after LVD of patients included in the registry. Methods Since its creation, 7 international expert HPB centers participated to the registry. Preoperative characteristics, data on liver regeneration after LVD, and postoperative results after hepatectomy were collected. Future liver remnant (FLR) and standardized FLR ratios were defined as FLR/total functional liver volume and FLR/total estimated liver volume. Results A total of 191 patients were included (71 women). Median age was 63 (IQR 53-69) and body-mass index 24.8 kg/m2 (IQR 22.3-28.7). Fifty-three patients were ASA III/IV. Main surgical indication was colorectal metastases (n=116). Median FLR and standardized FLR ratios before LVD were 33% (IQR 26-47) and 32% (IQR 23-39). Median time for the LVD procedure was 122 minutes (IQR 99-164). In one patient right hepatic vein embolization failed. Complications after LVD occurred in 14 patients (7%), including 7 hemorrhages/hematomas. After LVD, median FLR and standardized FLR ratios significantly increased to 46% (IQR 39-59, p&amp;lt;0.001) and 44% (IQR 35-50, p&amp;lt;0.001), corresponding to a median kinetic growth rate of 3.2%/week (IQR 1.6-5.3). Hepatectomy was performed in 142 patients (69 extended hepatectomies), while 49 dropped out (7 for insufficient hypertrophy (4%), 27 for tumor progression (14%), and 15 for other reasons (8%)). Seventy-one patients had postoperative complications (50%), and only 2 developed postoperative liver failure (1%). Median Comprehensive Complication Index was 20.9 (IQR 0-30.8) and 10 patients were reoperated (7%). Conclusion The preliminary data of this international registry showed that LVD had a high technical success rate (190/191) with few post-procedural complications and significant kinetic growth. Major hepatectomy after LVD appeared to be safe.

Safety and effectiveness of transsplenic access for portal venous interventions: a single-center retrospective study.

To assess the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous transsplenic access (PTSA) for portal vein (PV) interventions among patients with PV disease. Adult patients with PV disease were enrolled if they required percutaneous catheterization for PV angioplasty, embolization, thrombectomy, variceal embolization, or transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement for a difficult TIPS or recanalization of a chronically occluded PV. The procedures were performed between January 2018 and January 2023. Patients were excluded if they had an active infection, had a chronically occluded splenic vein malignant infiltration of the needle tract, had undergone splenectomy, or were under age 18years. Thirty patients (15 women, 15 men) were enrolled. Catheterization of the PV through PTSA succeeded for 29 of 30 patients (96.7%). The main adverse effect recorded was flank pain in 5 of 30 cases (16.7%). No bleeding events from the spleen, splenic vein, or percutaneous access point were recorded. Two cases (6.7%) each of hepatic bleeding and rethrombosis of the PV were reported, and a change in hemoglobin levels (mean [SD], - 0.5 [1.4] g/dL) was documented in 14 cases (46.7%). PTSA as an approach to accessing the PV is secure and achievable, with minimal risk of complications. Minimal to no bleeding is possible by using tract closure methods.

Catheter-Directed Ionic Liquid Embolic Agent for Rapid Portal Vein Embolization, Segmentectomy, and Bile Duct Ablation.

Embolic materials currently in use for portal vein embolization (PVE) do not treat the tumor, which poses a risk for tumor progression during the interval between PVE and surgical resection. Here, is developed an ionic-liquid-based embolic material (LEAD) for portal vein embolization, liver ablation, and drug delivery. LEAD is optimized and characterized for diffusivity, X-ray visibility, and cytotoxicity. In the porcine renal embolization model, LEAD delivered from the main renal artery reached vasculature down to 10 microns with uniform tissue ablation and delivery of small and large therapeutics. In non-survival and survival porcine experiments, successful PVE is achieved in minutes, leading to the expected chemical segmentectomy, and delivery of a large protein drug (i.e., Nivolumab) with LEAD. In cholangiocarcinoma mouse tumor models and in ex vivo human tumors, LEAD consistently achieved an effective ablation and wide drug distribution. Furthermore, various strains of drug-resistant patient-derived bacteria showed significant susceptibility to LEAD, suggesting that LEAD may also prevent infectious complications resulting from tissue ablation. With its capabilities to embolize, ablate, and deliver therapeutics, ease of use, and a high safety profile demonstrated in animal studies, LEAD offers a potential alternative to tumor ablation with or without PVE for FLR growth.

Safety and Effectiveness of Portal Vein Embolization after Hepatic Arterial Infusion Therapy

Portal vein embolization (PVE) is a tool potentially useful for inducing future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy in patients with advanced hepatic malignancies who are at high risk of hepatic insufficiency if treated with surgical resection. However, the safety and effectiveness of PVE in the context of patients who have undergone hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) are unknown. This retrospective, single-center study identified 9 patients who underwent PVE after HAI between January 2015 and December 2022. There were no major adverse events, including biliary injury or high-grade liver failure. Analysis showed an increase in standardized FLR from 21.1% (SEM ± 2.4) to 34.8% (SEM ± 2.1) over 9.8 weeks (SEM ± 1.2), with a mean kinetic growth rate of 1.9% (interquartile range, 0.9%–2.4%). Patients who have undergone HAI therapy should not be excluded from consideration of PVE as part of their operative clearance strategy.

Histological and radiological analysis of simultaneous dual hepatic vein embolization for right-sided major hepatectomy.

Simultaneous dual hepatic vein embolization (DHVE) has been proposed for safe right-sided hepatectomy, with good results for liver hypertrophy and function. However, the histological and radiological findings of DHVE have not been thoroughly investigated. This study included 14 patients who underwent DHVE before right-sided major hepatectomy. DHVE was performed if the future liver remnant was < 35% or borderline, but with concomitant vascular resection. The liver function was assessed using the signal intensity on Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI. A histological evaluation of the area of DHVE and portal vein embolization (PVE) were performed. The median pre- and post-functional liver remnants were 363ml and 498ml, respectively (p < 0.001). The median growth rate was 48.6%, and there was no post-hepatectomy liver failure in the patients who underwent DHVE. The signal intensity ratio in the area of DHVE was lower than that in the areas of PVE and the remnant liver (p < 0.01). The degree of congestion and necrosis was greater in the area of DHVE than in the area of PVE alone (p < 0.01 and p = 0.04, respectively). We observed good liver hypertrophy after DHVE and histological and radiological changes in the area of DHVE. Our findings provide a compelling rationale for further investigation of the mechanism of liver hypertrophy in DHVE.

Effects of preoperative biliary drainage on the outcomes of surgical treatment in cholangiocarcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis

BackgroundHyperbilirubinemia is known to increase morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing liver resection for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) in patients who have no acute cholangitis or require portal vein embolization is still debatable. The goal of this study is to investigate how PBD affects the surgical results after liver resection. MethodsBetween October 2013 and December 2020, CCA patients presenting with obstructive jaundice who underwent liver resection were retrospectively reviewed. The pre-operative, peri-operative and post-operative characteristics were extracted. To compare the outcomes of the PBD and direct surgery groups, propensity score matching analysis (PSM) and multivariable risk regression analysis were used to analyze. ResultsA total of 355 patients were enrolled, with 99 of them undergoing PBD. At diagnosis, those with PBD showed significantly greater bilirubin levels than those without (20.7 vs 9.6 ​mg/dL, p ​< ​0.001). However, after drainage, the bilirubin level in the PBD group was lower than the direct surgery group (5.5 vs 9.6 ​mg/dL, p ​< ​0.001). Overall postoperative morbidity and mortality were unaffected by PBD in full patient cohort. However, after PSM, PBD was associated with decreased major post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) and 90-day mortality rate, (20.3% vs 39.24%, p ​= ​0.014 and 3.8% vs 22.8%, p ​= ​0.001, respectively). At multivariable analysis of PSM patient cohort, PBD was associated with decreased major post-operative complication (RR 0.64, 95%CI 0.419–0.986), PHLF (RR 0.40, 95%CI 0.227–0.705) and 90-day mortality (RR 0.21, 95%CI 0.086–0.629). ConclusionPBD was associated with decreased post-hepatectomy liver failure and postoperative mortality after liver resection in jaundiced CCA patients.

Current Perspectives and Progress in Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization with Stem Cell Augmentation (PVESA).

Portal vein embolization with stem cell augmentation (PVESA) is an emerging approach for enhancing the growth of the liver segment that will remain after surgery (i.e., future liver remnant, FLR) in patients with liver cancer. Conventional portal vein embolization (PVE) aims to induce preoperative FLR growth, but it has a risk of failure in patients with underlying liver dysfunction and comorbid illnesses. PVESA combines PVE with stem cell therapy to potentially improve FLR size and function more effectively and efficiently. Various types of stem cells can help improve liver growth by secreting paracrine signals for hepatocyte growth or by transforming into hepatocytes. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), unrestricted somatic stem cells, and small hepatocyte-like progenitor cells have been used to augment liver growth in preclinical animal models, while clinical studies have demonstrated the benefit of CD133 + bone marrow-derived MSCs and hematopoietic stem cells. These investigations have shown that PVESA is generally safe and enhances liver growth after PVE. However, optimizing the selection, collection, and application of stem cells remains crucial to maximize benefits and minimize risks. Additionally, advanced stem cell technologies, such as priming, genetic modification, and extracellular vesicle-based therapy, that could further enhance efficacy outcomes should be evaluated. Despite its potential, PVESA requires more investigations, particularly mechanistic studies that involve orthotopic animal models of liver cancer with concomitant liver injury as well as larger human trials.

Liver regeneration after portal and hepatic vein embolization improves overall survival compared with portal vein embolization alone: mid-term survival analysis of the multicentre DRAGON 0 cohort.

The purpose of this study was to compare 3-year overall survival after simultaneous portal (PVE) and hepatic vein (HVE) embolization versus PVE alone in patients undergoing liver resection for primary and secondary cancers of the liver. In this multicentre retrospective study, all DRAGON 0 centres provided 3-year follow-up data for all patients who had PVE/HVE or PVE, and were included in DRAGON 0 between 2016 and 2019. Kaplan-Meier analysis was undertaken to assess 3-year overall and recurrence/progression-free survival. Factors affecting survival were evaluated using univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses. In total, 199 patients were included from 7 centres, of whom 39 underwent PVE/HVE and 160 PVE alone. Groups differed in median age (P = 0.008). As reported previously, PVE/HVE resulted in a significantly higher resection rate than PVE alone (92 versus 68%; P = 0.007). Three-year overall survival was significantly higher in the PVE/HVE group (median survival not reached after 36 months versus 20 months after PVE; P = 0.004). Univariable and multivariable analyses identified PVE/HVE as an independent predictor of survival (univariable HR 0.46, 95% c.i. 0.27 to 0.76; P = 0.003). Overall survival after PVE/HVE is substantially longer than that after PVE alone in patients with primary and secondary liver tumours.

Long-term remnant liver volume dynamics after major hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma following portal vein embolization

BackgroundPortal vein embolization (PVE) followed by major hepatectomy is a common treatment strategy for patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC); however, the long-term dynamics of the liver remnant volume (LRV) remain unclear. Here, we report the dynamics of the LRV in patients who underwent hepatectomy following PVE. MethodsA total of 39 patients with PHCC who underwent right hemihepatectomy or left trisectionectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection between 2004 and 2021 were enrolled in this study [PVE (n = 27) and non-PVE (n = 12]). Long-term remnant liver dynamics were analyzed in propensity score-matched pairs (n = 10/group). ResultsThe LRV/future liver remnant volume (FLRV) at 1 week to 1 month after hepatectomy were smaller in the PVE group than in the non-PVE group (1.53 vs. 1.69, p = .044 and 1.52 vs 1.99, p = .003, respectively). In the non-PVE group, the LRV/FLRV ratio plateaued 1–3 months postoperatively, whereas progressive hypertrophy occurred in the PVE group, and the LRV/FLRV ratio became equal in both groups at 1 year after hepatectomy (1.96 vs. 1.97; p = .799). Multivariate analysis revealed that FLRV/total liver volume (TLV) ≤ 0.43 was the only independent predictor of LRV/FLRV ≥1.9 at 1 year after hepatectomy (odds ratio:5.345, 95% confidence interval:1.210–23.615; p = .027). ConclusionAlthough the long-term LRV was nearly equal in both groups, short-term LRV hypertrophy was lower in the PVE group than in the non-PVE group.

Is ALPPS still appropriate for large or locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in an era of targeted agents and immunotherapy?

Therapeutic options for large or locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have limited efficacy. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads trans-arterial chemo-embolization (dTACE), portal vein embolization (PVE), tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) compared to Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) for large or locally advanced HCC.Data regarding clinicopathological details, safety, and oncological outcomes were reviewed for the quadruple therapy (dTACE-PVE-TKI-ICI) and compared with ALPPS.From 2019 to 2020, 10 patients with large or locally advanced HCC underwent future remnant liver (FRL) modulation (dTACE-PVE-TKI-ICI: 5; ALPPS: 5). All five dTACE-PVE-TKI-ICI cases responded well, with patients #4 and #5 achieving complete tumor necrosis. The overall response rate (ORR) was 5/5. Patients #1-4 underwent hepatectomy, while #5 declined surgery due to complete tumor necrosis. Mean FRL volume increased by 75.3% (range 60.0%-89.4%) in 2-4months, compared to 104.6% (range 51.3%-160.8%) in 21-37days for ALPPS (P = 0.032). Major postoperative complications occurred in 1/5 ALPPS patients. Resection rates were 4/4 for quadruple therapy and 5/5 for ALPPS. 2-year progression free survival for dTACE-PVE-TKI-ICI and ALPPS were 5/5 and 3/5, respectively.Quadruple therapy is a feasible, effective strategy for enhancing resectability by downsizing tumors and inducing FRL hypertrophy, with manageable complications and improved long-term prognosis. In addition, it provokes the re-examination of the application of ALPPS in an era of molecular and immune treatments.