Background: Surgery is the standard treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). In presence of macroscopic vascular invasion (Macrovasc), the outcome of resection is still to elucidate. Methods: A multi-institutional series of ICC patients was analysed. The 247 patients undergoing resection without operative mortality were included. Preoperative imaging and pathology data were reviewed to identify Macrovasc. Results: Of the analyzed patients, 82 (33%) had Macrovasc: 39 of a portal branch, 21 of a hepatic vein, and 22 of both. Patients with Macrovasc had larger tumors (>50 mm 65 vs. 44%, p=0.002) and more N+ (44 vs. 30%, p=0.068). Patients with Macrovasc had lower survival (3-year OS 47 vs. 61%, p=0.025). Lower OS was observed for both hepatic vein Macrovasc (3-year OS 40.1%, p=0.032) and portal Macrovasc (44.7%, p=0.010). The level of portal invasion (1st- vs. 2nd-order branches) did not modify prognosis (p=0.813). If both a hepatic vein and a portal branch had Macrovasc the prognosis further decreased (3-year OS 29.1%), but was still higher than unresected patients (0% at 24 months, p<0.001). At the multivariable analysis, hepatic vein invasion was a negative prognostic factor of OS (p=0.041, OR=1.709). Additional prognostic factors were N+ (p< 0.001), R1 resection (p=0.040), ICC size >50 mm (p=0.040) and number>1 (p<0.001). Conclusion: One-third of patients with ICC have Macrovasc. It is a negative prognostic factor, but not a contraindication to surgery because complete resection may confer a survival benefit.
Read full abstract