Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming numerous sectors, including the port industry. This article addresses how AI-based solutions can revolutionize business development in port environments, providing significant competitive advantages. The state of the art reveals that ports face increasing challenges in terms of operational efficiency, resource optimization, and competitiveness. In this context, AI emerges as a powerful tool capable of analyzing large volumes of data and making informed decisions.The content of the article is structured into several key sections. First, it explores the competitive advantages offered by AI in the port sector, such as resource optimization, strategic decision-making, improved security, environmental sustainability, and customer experience. Specific applications such as predictive analytics, process automation, and route optimization are discussed. Case studies of ports that have successfully implemented AI technologies, such as the Port of Rotterdam, the Port of Hamburg, and the Port of Singapore, are presented to illustrate the benefits obtained and the challenges overcome.The development of the research focuses on the algorithms and analysis techniques used, including machine learning, neural networks, and natural language processing. Various applications in the port sector are analyzed, from facility pre-design and space optimization to Capex and Opex estimations and business generation capacity. AI is also used to improve operational efficiency and optimize investments and costs.The conclusions emphasize that, although the adoption of AI presents challenges, such as the need for advanced technological infrastructure and continuous staff training, the potential benefits are significant. AI enables ports to improve operational efficiency, reduce costs, increase security and sustainability, and offer better services to customers. Finally, recommendations for the successful implementation of AI solutions are proposed, emphasizing the importance of detailed strategic planning, collaboration with technology partners, and adequate staff training.article is to provide an extensive comparison of some of them, showing their similarities and also their regulatory differences, as well as possible gaps and inconsistencies.
Read full abstract