Porous Graphene Oxide Research Articles

Oxidation of SO2 to SO3 catalyzed by graphene oxide foams

Porous graphene oxide foams were prepared by unidirectional freeze-drying technology and used to investigate the reaction between graphene oxide (GO) and SO2. The structure and composition changes of the graphene oxide were monitored by X-ray photoelectron spectrometry (XPS), Raman, X-ray diffraction (XRD), Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy (UV-vis), and the product of the reaction was analyzed by an EDTA titration. The results show that SO2 was oxidized to SO3 and the GO was reduced. GO not only acts as the oxidant in the reaction, but also as the catalyst to catalyze the reaction of SO2 and O2 to form SO3. This catalytic action is more active in the aqueous GO suspensions than in the foams. The GO foams can adsorb SO2 and convert it to SO3 which then changes to SO42− on contact with water. This offers a new effective method of converting noisome SO2 gas to SO3 at room temperature.

Porous graphene oxide frameworks: Synthesis and gas sorption properties

We report detailed synthesis of a range of porous graphene oxide frameworks (GOFs) by expansion of graphene oxide (GO) sheets with various linear boronic acid pillaring units in a solvothermal reaction. The GOF structures develop through boronate-ester formation as a result of B–O bonding between boronic acids and oxygen functional groups on the GO layers. Synthesized GOFs exhibit periodic layered structures with largely expanded interlayer spacing as characterized by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD). The boronate-ester link formation is further evidenced by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and Raman spectroscopy. Furthermore, the strong boronate-ester bonds between GO layers results in improved thermal stability over the precursor GO. The solvent-free, evacuated frameworks provide highly increased accessible surface area for nitrogen adsorption compared to GO alone, which depends on the type and length of the boronic acid, indicating the importance of pillaring unit. Both isosteric heat of adsorption (Qst) and the adsorbed hydrogen capacity per surface area are twice as large as typical porous carbon materials and comparable to metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) with open metal centers. This enhanced Qst and adsorption capacity is attributed to optimum interlayer spacing between graphene planes such that hydrogen molecules interact with both surfaces. Finally, our systematic study reveals the profound effect of both synthesis and activation temperatures to obtain porous framework structures.