Popliteal Vein Injuries Research Articles

Impact of ligation versus repair of isolated popliteal vein injuries on Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism incidence in trauma patients: a meta-analysis.

Traumatic injuries affecting the veins in the lower extremities have been correlated with both mortality and severe complications. Venous injuries are recognized as a contributing factor to the development of venous thromboembolism, commonly treated through procedures involving either vein ligation or repair. Despite previous efforts, substantial uncertainty remains when it comes to choosing between the execution of ligation versus various reparative techniques. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term results of surgically treating traumatic venous injuries through repair compared to ligation, specifically examining the resulting impacts on trauma patients in relation to DVT and PE occurrences. A comprehensive search strategy was employed until August 10, 2023, to systematically explore Scopus and PubMed databases. Following the removal of duplicates, two researchers independently assessed the titles and abstracts of the identified studies. Only studies meeting the project's requirements and inclusion criteria, as evaluated through their full texts, were included in our investigation. Our study exclusively focused on original articles, specifically those involving human trauma patients with isolated popliteal vein injuries. Excluded from consideration were review articles, meta-analyses, cellular and molecular research, animal studies, case reports, case series, letters to the editor, posters, duplicates, and publications in languages other than English. The implementation of this systematic review and meta-analysis conformed to the standards delineated in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Conducting a thorough search, the inquiry identified 248 records. The assessment of titles and abstracts led to 51 studies that had the potential for eligibility. After reviewing the full texts of the chosen studies, 4 studies involving 1521 patients constituted the ultimate findings. We concluded that the ligation procedure had a higher incidence of pulmonary embolism compared to the repair of vein injuries, while the repair procedure had a higher incidence of deep vein thrombosis than ligation. Additional large-scale randomized controlled trials are still necessary to further support the findings of this meta-analysis.

Identifying Risk Factors for Poor Outcomes Following Popliteal Vascular Injuries

IntroductionPopliteal artery injuries may have amputation rates as high as 20%. This study focuses on identifying risk factors associated with major amputations following popliteal artery injuries in a large single-center cohort. Additionally, we assess the impact of repairing or ligating concomitant popliteal vein injuries. MethodsA retrospective chart review encompassing 2011 to 2023 was conducted at a large urban level 1 trauma center. Patients with popliteal artery injuries were included. Demographics and clinical data were analyzed, and univariate and multivariate evaluations identified significant risk factors for amputation. In patients with concomitant popliteal vein injuries, we compared outcomes between those who underwent popliteal vein repair and ligation. Results188 patients with popliteal artery injuries were identified, 10 underwent index amputation and were excluded. Univariate analysis followed by multivariate analysis revealed that obesity (p= 0.0132) and neurologic deficits on arrival (p=0.0096) were associated with amputation. In the subgroup with popliteal vein injuries (N=93), there was no significant difference in amputation rates between those who had vein repair (p=0.21) and those who underwent ligation (p=0.84) on logistic regression analysis. Likewise, popliteal vein ligation did not impact duration of fasciotomy closure (p=0.20) or skin graft area (p=0.48) based on linear regression analysis. ConclusionOur study suggests that major amputations following popliteal artery injuries are more likely in obese patients with neurologic deficits. It also suggests that venous ligation in cases of concomitant popliteal vein injuries does not significantly impact early limb salvage rate. Further research is needed to determine the optimal approach for managing concomitant popliteal vein injuries.

Rapid popliteal artery release sensu A.N. Kazantsev in acute thrombosis in patients with COVID-19

Aim. To analyze the outcomes of popliteal thrombectomy using the standard release technique with vascular instruments and rapid release sensu A. N. Kazantsev in patients with acute popliteal artery thrombosis (PAT) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).Material and methods. The present prospective single-center study for the period from April 1, 2020 to March 17, 2021 included 157 patients with acute PAT and COVID-19 at the Alexandrovskaya City Hospital. All patients were divided into 2 groups depending on the popliteal artery access: group 1 (n=88; 56%) — rapid release sensu A. N. Kazantsev; group 2 (n=69; 44%) — standard popliteal artery release using vascular instruments (vascular forceps and scissors) and tourniquets. Rapid popliteal artery release was distinguished by the fact that fasciotomy and hemostasis, the fatty tissue behind it and up to the artery was torn with two index fingers. First, the fingers were joined together at the lateral edges and inserted into the wound middle. Then the wound together with tissues was stretched with fingers to proximal and distal edges until the popliteal artery was visualized. Further, a Beckmann retractor was used to fix the torn fiber to the upper and lower wound walls. The tourniquets were not used.Results. Surgical access duration (group 1, 4,5±1,3 minutes; group 2, 11,41±0,9 minutes; p=0,005), as well as the total procedure duration (group 1, 47,5±2,8 minutes; group 2, 62,15±4,5 min; p=0,001) had the lowest values in the group of rapid popliteal artery release. Moreover, all intraoperative bleedings (n=11; 15,9%) was recorded in group 2 as a result of popliteal vein injuries and/or bleeding from popliteal artery. The retrombosis rate in the rapid release group was lower (group 1, 40,9%; group 2, 55,1%; p=0,03). On the first day after surgery, 18% of thrombosis developed in group 1, and 39% in group 2. The mortality rate was highest in the standard artery release group (group 1, 55,7%; group 2, 86,9%; p<0,0001; OR, 0,18; 95% CI, 0,08-0,42). In all cases, the cause of death was systemic multiple organ failure due to severe pneumonia, pulmonary edema, and cytokine storm.Conclusion. The use of rapid popliteal artery release sensu A. N. Kazantsev significantly reduces the thrombectomy duration in the context of COVID-19. This effect is achieved due to a decrease in the incidence of intraoperative bleeding, no need to use tourniquets and vascular instruments. A decrease in the ischemia duration using novel release technique reduces the retrombosis rate, as well as deaths caused by systemic multiple organ failure against the background of hyperperfusion and compartment syndrome. Reducing the operation duration with the use of rapid popliteal artery release sensu A. N. Kazantsev reduces the time of intraoperative mechanical ventilation, which in COVID-19 patients reduces the risks of pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, emphysema, and pulmonary embolism. Thus, the rapid popliteal artery release sensu A. N. Kazantsev can be recommended for popliteal thrombectomy in patients with COVID-19.

Contemporary outcomes of traumatic popliteal artery injury repair from the popliteal scoring assessment for vascular extremity injury in trauma study

ObjectiveTraumatic popliteal artery injuries are associated with the greatest risk of limb loss of all peripheral vascular injuries, with amputation rates of 10% to 15%. The purpose of the present study was to examine the outcomes of patients who had undergone operative repair for traumatic popliteal arterial injuries and identify the factors independently associated with limb loss. MethodsA multi-institutional retrospective review of all patients with traumatic popliteal artery injuries from 2007 to 2018 was performed. All the patients who had undergone operative repair of popliteal arterial injuries were included in the present analysis. The patients who had required a major lower extremity amputation (transtibial or transfemoral) were compared with those with successful limb salvage at the last follow-up. The significant predictors (P < .05) for amputation on univariate analysis were included in a multivariable analysis. ResultsA total of 302 patients from 11 institutions were included in the present analysis. The median age was 32 years (interquartile range, 21-40 years), and 79% were men. The median follow-up was 72 days (interquartile range, 20-366 days). The overall major amputation rate was 13%. Primary repair had been performed in 17% of patients, patch repair in 2%, and interposition or bypass in 81%. One patient had undergone endovascular repair with stenting. The overall 1-year primary patency was 89%. Of the patients who had lost primary patency, 46% ultimately required major amputation. Early loss (within 30 days postoperatively) of primary patency was five times more frequent for the patients who had subsequently required amputation. On multivariate regression, the significant perioperative factors independently associated with major amputation included the initial POPSAVEIT (popliteal scoring assessment for vascular extremity injury in trauma) score, loss of primary patency, absence of detectable immediate postoperative pedal Doppler signals, and lack of postoperative antiplatelet therapy. Concomitant popliteal vein injury, popliteal injury location (P1, P2, P3), injury severity score, and tibial vs popliteal distal bypass target were not independently associated with amputation. ConclusionsTraumatic popliteal artery injuries are associated with a significant rate of major amputation. The preoperative POPSAVEIT score remained independently associated with amputation after including the perioperative factors. The lack of postoperative pedal Doppler signals and loss of primary patency were highly associated with major amputation. The use of postoperative antiplatelet therapy was inversely associated with amputation, perhaps indicating a protective effect.

Acute Arthroscopic Removal of a Bullet Embedded in the Glenoid: A Case Report

Introduction:Retained bullets in joint spaces have been shown to cause both mechanical and chemical damage to the joint surfaces, leading to the risk of arthritis if untreated.Case Report:A case of arthroscopic treatment for a gunshot to the shoulder with a retained bullet embedded in the glenoid is presented. The patient presented with multiple gunshots to his back and extremities, including gunshot to the left leg with popliteal vein injury, gunshot to the back with lumbar level laminar fractures and acute spinal cord injury, and gunshot to the left shoulder with a retained bullet in the posterior superior glenoid.Conclusion:Shoulder arthroscopy can be successfully employed to retrieve larger embedded bullet or foreign body with the help of tools such as laparoscopic graspers. Even with significant glenoid bone defect, the stability of the shoulder joint does not get compromised if the bone defects are located posterosuperiorly.

A propensity-matched analysis of contemporary outcomes of blunt popliteal artery injury

ObjectiveTraumatic popliteal artery injury is associated with an increased propensity for limb loss, morbidity, and mortality above an already elevated baseline risk to life and limb. Previous studies of outcomes in this patient group have been limited by selection bias. This study analyzed outcomes after blunt popliteal artery injury using propensity matching to reduce confounding variables associated with multiple mechanisms of traumatic vascular injury and to identify factors associated with amputation. MethodsA retrospective review was conducted of prospectively collected data from the National Trauma Data Bank. Patients were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes related to patterns of blunt injury associated with popliteal arterial injury or intervention. Using Trauma Quality Improvement Program variables as a reference, specific characteristics were collected. Variables found significant on univariate analysis were used to generate propensity-matched amputation and nonamputation cohorts. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess for risk factors associated with amputation and inpatient mortality. ResultsIn total, 3029 patients with blunt popliteal artery injury were identified; 628 (20.7%) underwent amputation. Patients who underwent amputation presented with more frequent hypotension (systolic blood pressure of 0-99 mm Hg, 22.7% vs 12.8%; P < .001) and tachycardia (heart rate >120 beats/min, 28.5% vs 14.5%; P < .001). Limb loss was also associated with concurrent popliteal vein injury (18.3% vs 8.7%; P < .001) and tibial nerve injury (5.3% vs 1.3%; P < .001) as well as with elevated Injury Severity Score (median, 13 vs 9; P < .001) and lower extremity Abbreviated Injury Scale score (3 vs 2; P < .001). Subsequently, 794 patients were divided into equal number propensity-matched amputation and nonamputation cohorts. Regression analysis revealed that patients with diabetes mellitus (odds ratio [OR], 1.763; P = .049), popliteal vein injury (OR, 1.657; P = .012), or tibial nerve injury (OR, 3.537; P = .007) were more likely to undergo amputation. Further regression analysis with patients matched for Injury Severity Score revealed that age ≥86 years (OR, 38.092; P = .009), patellar fracture (OR, 3.445; P = .036), and elevated Abbreviated Injury Scale score (OR, 1.101; P < .001) were associated with higher risk of inpatient death. ConclusionsTrauma patients who sustain blunt popliteal artery injury are at an increased risk of amputation. Propensity-matched analysis revealed that concurrent popliteal vein and tibial nerve injury but not severity of tissue injury predicted limb loss.

Outcomes and Predictors of Popliteal Artery Injury in Pediatric Trauma

Popliteal artery injury (PAI) is a rare occurrence in pediatric patients with significant consequences. Delays in diagnosis lead to severe complications such as lifelong disability and limb loss. We sought to identify outcomes and clinical predictors of PAI in the pediatric trauma population. The Pediatric Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2014-2016) was queried for patients ≤17 years old with PAI. Patient demographics and outcomes were characterized. A comparison of patients sustaining blunt versus penetrating PAI was performed. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of PAI. From 119,132 patients, 58 (<0.1%) sustained a PAI with 74.1% from blunt trauma. Most of the patients were male (75.9%) with a median age of 15 and median Injury Severity Score of 9. A majority of the patients were treated with open repair (62.1%) in comparison to endovascular repair (10.3%) and nonoperative management (36.2%). The rates of open and endovascular repair and nonoperative management were similar between blunt and penetrating PAI patients (P=not significant). Concomitant injuries included popliteal vein injury (PVI) (12.1%), posterior tibial nerve injury (3.4%), peroneal nerve injury (3.4%), and closed fracture/dislocation of the femur (22.4%), patella (25.9%), and tibia/fibula (29.3%). Overall complications included compartment syndrome (8.6%), below-knee amputation (6.9%), and above-knee amputation (3.4%). The overall mortality was 3.4%. Patients with PAI secondary to penetrating trauma had a higher rate of concomitant PVI (26.7% vs. 7%, P=0.04) and posterior tibial nerve injury (13.3% vs. 0%, P=0.02) but a lower rate of closed fracture/dislocation of the patella (0% vs. 34.9%, P=0.008) and tibia/fibula (0% vs. 39.5%, P=0.004) compared to patients with PAI from blunt trauma. Predictors for PAI included PVI (odds ratio [OR] 296.57, confidence interval [CI]=59.21-1,485.47, P<0.001), closed patella fracture/dislocation (OR 50.0, CI=24.22-103.23, P<0.001), open femur fracture/dislocation (OR 9.05, CI=3.56-22.99, P<0.001), closed tibia/fibula fracture/dislocation (OR 7.44, CI=3.81-14.55, P<0.001), and open tibia/fibula fracture/dislocation (OR 4.57, CI=1.80-11.59, P<0.001). PVI had the highest association with PAI in penetrating trauma (OR 84.62, CI=13.22-541.70, P<0.001) while closed patella fracture/dislocation had the highest association in blunt trauma (OR 52.01, CI=24.50-110.31, P<0.001). A higher index of suspicion should be present for PAI in pediatric trauma patients presenting with a closed patella fracture/dislocation after blunt trauma. PVI is most strongly associated with PAI in penetrating trauma. Prompt recognition of PAI is crucial as there is a greater than 10% amputation rate in the pediatric population.

Impact of ligation versus repair of isolated popliteal vein injuries on in-hospital outcomes in trauma patients

BackgroundPopliteal vascular injuries are common and frequently associated with limb loss. Although many studies have evaluated the treatment and outcomes of popliteal artery injuries (PAI), there is little available evidence regarding popliteal venous injuries (PVI). As such, substantial debate remains regarding the benefit of repair over ligation of PVI. The objectives of this study were to compare in-hospital outcomes of repair versus ligation of isolated PVI, as well as to determine nonvascular factors associated with worse outcomes. MethodsPatients in the National Trauma Databank from 2007 to 2014 with at least one PVI were evaluated. First, patients with concomitant PVI and PAI were compared with patients with isolated PVI. Second, outcomes were compared between ligation and repair of isolated PVI. To limit the impact of concomitant injuries and focus on the impact of venous injury management, we defined isolated PVI as cases without concomitant PAI and with Abbreviated Injury Scale severity score of less than 3 for all body regions other than lower extremity. Patients dead on arrival and those with less than 18 years of age were excluded. The primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, amputation, and in-hospital amputation-free survival (AFS). Secondary outcomes included lower extremity compartment syndrome, fasciotomy, acute kidney injury, pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis, and inferior vena cava filter placement. ResultsOverall, 1819 patients (0.03%) had a PVI and after exclusion 1213 met the criteria for initial analysis. Of those, 308 had isolated PVI, and 905 had combined PVI and PAI. Patients with combined PVI and PAI had higher rates of amputation (15.2% vs 6.8%; P < .001), fasciotomy (64.5% vs 30.8%; P < .001), compartment syndrome (14.8% vs 8.8%; P = .006), and a lower AFS (82.9% vs 91.8%; P < .001) than patients with isolated PVI. There was no difference in in-hospital mortality, amputation, or in-hospital AFS between ligation and repair of isolated PVI. On multivariable logistic regression of isolated PVI, ligation was not independently associated with in-hospital AFS, amputation, or mortality. ConclusionsLigation of isolated PVI was not an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality, lower extremity amputation, or in-hospital AFS. Ligation also did not result in higher rates of fasciotomy, acute kidney injury, or pulmonary embolism.

Analysis of Limb Outcomes by Management of Concomitant Vein Injury in Military Popliteal Artery Trauma

Despite aggressive limb salvage attempts, military popliteal artery injuries are associated with high amputation rates. Combined arterial and venous injuries present a management dilemma for military surgeons in austere settings, and the impact of vein injury management strategy on limb outcomes is not clear. Military casualties sustaining combined ipsilateral popliteal artery and vein injuries from 2003 to 2016 were identified from a military vascular injury database. Limbs were grouped based on whether venous ligation or repair was initially performed. The primary outcome was secondary amputation; the secondary outcomes included limb and vascular/graft complications. Fifty-six limbs were included; of which, 27 (48%) were managed with vein ligation and 29 (52%) with repair. Veins were repaired primarily in 13 (45%) cases with the remainder being treated with interposition grafts. Median injury severity score was higher in the ligation group (19 vs 15, P=0.09), but vascular and concomitant limb injury characteristics were similar. Amputation rates did not differ by vein treatment (45% repair vs. 41% ligation, P=0.76), and this held with injuries above and below the knee considered independently. Most (71%) amputations were performed <30days from injury. Amputation was indicated more frequently for vascular repair failure in the ligated group (55% vs 15%, P=0.04). Four graft infections were all in the repair group (P=0.07 vs ligation). Arterial graft complications were more frequent with vein repair (45%) than ligation (30%), but this did not reach significance (P=0.24). Only one deep vein thrombosis was diagnosed in each group (P=0.96). Type of management of concomitant popliteal vein injury was not associated with early or late amputation in this series of military popliteal artery injuries. Vein injury management may have had implications for the development of arterial graft and limb complications, however. Surgical decision-making regarding popliteal vein treatment should balance short-term contingencies with long-term limb salvage issues.

Decreased National Rate of below the Knee Amputation in Patients with Popliteal Artery Injury

Popliteal arterial injury (PAI) is the second most common infrainguinal arterial injury after femoral artery injury with an incidence <0.2%. A 2003 analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) reported a below the knee amputation (BKA) rate of 7.1% in patients with PAI as well as higher risk in those with an associated fracture or nerve injury. Given advances in vascular surgical techniques, improved multidisciplinary care, and expeditious diagnosis with computed tomography angiography, we hypothesized that the national rate of BKA in patients with PAI has decreased and sought to identify risk factors for BKA in patients with PAI. A retrospective analysis of the NTDB was performed from 2007 to 2015. Patients ≥15years of age with PAI were included and grouped by mechanism of injury (blunt versus penetrating). Interfacility transfers were excluded. The primary outcome of interest was BKA. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify predictors of BKA in patients with PAI. From 4,385,698 patients, 5,143 were identified with PAI (<0.2%) with most involved in a blunt mechanism (56.8%). The overall limb loss rate was 5.1% (decreased from 7.1% in 2003, P=0.0037). After adjusting for covariates, a blunt mechanism (odds ratio [OR]=3.53, confidence intervals [CI]=2.49-5.01, P<0.001) and open proximal tibia/fibula fracture or dislocation (OR=2.71, CI=2.08-3.54, P<0.001) were independent risk factors for BKA in patients with PAI. A combined popliteal vein injury (PVI) did not increase the risk for BKA (P=0.64). The national rate of limb loss in trauma patients with PAI has decreased from 7.1 to 5.1%. A blunt mechanism of injury as well as proximal open tibia/fibula fracture or dislocation continue to be the independent risk factors for BKA. Confirming a previous report, we found a combined PVI not to be associated with higher risk for BKA. Future prospective research to determine other possible contributing factors such as intraoperative hemodynamics and utilization of vascular shunt and fasciotomy appears warranted.

Risk factors associated with amputation in civilian popliteal artery trauma

Popliteal artery trauma is uncommon but is associated with a high risk of limb loss depending on the scenario involving blunt or penetrating trauma as well as the severity and extent of injury that has occurred. In our setting there is a significant amount of gang and civilian warfare resulting in Vascular Trauma. There were 32 patients over a decade who sustained traumatic injury to the popliteal artery consisting of 30 males (94%) and 2 females with an age range 16–59 years with a mean of 32. There were 20 cases of penetrating trauma (63%) and 12 cases of blunt trauma (37%). Of the penetrating trauma, 18 were due to gunshot wounds (GSWs) (90%) and 2 stabs. The majority (7/12; 58%) of blunt trauma was due to falls, and 42% (5/12) secondary to motor vehicular accidents (MVAs). In terms of extent of injury, 21 of 32 patients (65%) sustained an isolated popliteal artery injury, whilst 6 (19%) had injury to both the popliteal artery and vein and another 5 (16%) had combined popliteal artery, vein and nerve injuries. There were 14 cases with associated orthopaedic injuries: 7 posterior knee dislocations, 1 fracture/dislocation of the knee, 2 femoral fractures, 2 tibial plateau fractures and 2 tibia/fibula fracture. Methods of repair included 14 reversed vein grafts, 16 polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts and 2 primary. The overall amputation rate was 28% (9 patients). Of the penetrating trauma patients 25% required amputations composed of 5 GSWs, 33% of the blunt trauma patients required amputations. It was noted that factors associated with (but not statistically significant) poor outcomes included combined artery/vein injury, artery/vein/nerve injury, concomitant fracture/dislocation and delayed transfer to a Vascular Surgery Unit. The type of graft or repair did not affect outcome. The incidence of popliteal artery trauma was calculated at 2.46 per 100,000 population per year.

Civilian popliteal artery injuries

Civilian popliteal artery injuries are associated with significant amputation rates. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with limb loss in patients with popliteal artery injuries. We performed a retrospective chart review of prospectively collected data on patients with popliteal artery injuries presenting to the Trauma Centre at Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, from 1 January 1999 to 31 December 2008. Demographic data, mechanism of injury, haemodynamic status, limb viability, special investigations, associated injuries, ischaemic time, surgical treatment and amputation rates were analysed. One hundred and thirty-six patients with popliteal artery injuries were identified. Penetrating and blunt trauma accounted for 81 (59.6%) and 55 (40.4%) injuries, respectively. Associated injuries included fractures in 66 patients (48.6%), knee dislocations in 29 (21.3%) and popliteal vein injuries in 59 (43.4%). Fifty-seven patients (41.9%) presented with a compartment syndrome. Arterial injuries were treated with reversed vein grafting in 68 patients, primary anastomosis in 33, prosthetic graft insertion in 11, and primary amputation in 7. Thirty-two patients underwent delayed amputation, giving an overall amputation rate of 37.5%. A delay of more than 7 hours of ischaemic time between injury and definitive repair (p=0.0236) and the presence of a compartment syndrome (p=0.003) were significantly associated with an increased amputation rate. The most significant factors associated with the high amputation rate of 37.5% were an ischaemic time longer than 7 hours, and the presence of a compartment syndrome.

Management of traumatic popliteal vein injuries

PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate different repair methods of popliteal vein injuries, and to assess the relationship between early patency and surgical outcome. MethodsThirty patients with popliteal vein injuries underwent surgical repair procedure at our hospital from March 2000 to April 2010. Patients who were haemodynamically unstable and those with massive bleeding from limb wounds were taken directly to the operating room. Stable patients underwent preoperative colour-flow duplex ultrasonography (CFDU). ResultsOur study group consisted of 26 males and 4 females, ranging in age from 17 to 60 years with a mean age of 25.3±5.9 years. The mechanism of trauma was penetrating in 27 patients and blunt in the remaining 3 patients. Treatment included primary venous repair in 11 cases, end-to-end anastomosis in 8, interposition vein graft in 10, and interposition polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) graft in 1. There were 26 patients with associated arterial injury, of which 4 cases had primary repair, 9 had end-to-end anastomosis, 11 had saphenous vein graft interposition, and 2 had PTFE graft interposition. Associated bone fracture was seen in 6 patients. There were no deaths. One patient required a below-knee amputation. Postoperative CFDU revealed thrombosed venous repair in 7 cases without any sequelae. ConclusionPopliteal venous injuries can be repaired with minimal downside and a good early patency rate. Additionally, transient venous patency allows for establishment of venous and lymphatic collateralisation. Alternatively, venous ligation should be considered only in unstable patients who refuse blood transfusion (Jehovah's witnesses). In these victims, adjuvant management may be required such as the use of fasciotomy and anticoagulation treatment.

Incidence and Outcome of Pulmonary Embolism following Popliteal Venous Repair in Trauma Cases

Objectives and design Popliteal vein repair and ligation are the two main approaches to the treatment of the venous component of major, complex, knee injuries with vascular involvement. We have studied the incidence of pulmonary embolism following popliteal vein repair in trauma cases using computed tomography (CT) angiography and report the outcome. Material and methods From June 2006 to December 2009, 45 patients with popliteal vein injury were operated on in our vascular unit using lateral venorrhaphy, end-to-end anastomosis, a saphenous vein interposition graft and venous patch repair. All the patients were operated on using a medial approach to the knee. On the third postoperative day, all patients underwent a colour Doppler scan of the repaired popliteal vein to study patency, and pulmonary artery CT angiography using a 64-slice multidetector CT scan unit to establish the incidence of pulmonary embolism. Results The number of patients treated by each method were: lateral venorrhaphy 20 (44%), end-to-end anastomosis 13 (29%), saphenous vein interposition graft 9 (20%) and venous patch repair three (7%). Two patients (4%) died because of sudden cardio-respiratory arrest the day after surgery with massive bilateral pulmonary artery embolism at autopsy. Popliteal colour duplex ultrasound imaging showed seven (16%) cases of complete vein thrombosis and seven (16%) cases of partial vein thrombosis. CT angiography showed pulmonary embolism in 11 (26%) patients. From seven patients with complete thrombosis three patients, and from seven patients with incomplete thrombosis five patients showed pulmonary embolism on CT angiography. Other than two cases of early mortality, five (12%) patients developed clinical manifestations of pulmonary embolism and 11 (26%) patients had pulmonary embolism detected by CT angiography. Seven (16%) of our patients had mild-to-severe pulmonary embolism and 13 patients (29%) had proven pulmonary embolism. The total mortality rate was 7%. Conclusion A surprisingly high incidence of pulmonary embolism was observed after popliteal vein repair in civil trauma patients. Additional prophylactic methods such as using higher doses of heparin and using inferior vena cava (IVC) filters might be needed to prevent this potentially fatal complication.

Management of high-risk popliteal vascular blunt trauma: clinical experience with 62 cases

The purpose of this study is to report the clinical and functional outcomes of patients, treated between 2004 and 2009, with high-risk popliteal vascular injuries due to compound fractures about the knee. A retrospective analysis was conducted of prospectively collected data from Tabriz Medical Trauma Center. Our aim was to perform surgical revascularization as soon as the arterial injury was recognized. The mechanism of injury was blunt in the entire cohort of patients, and all of them had bone fractures about the knee. The treatment of arterial injury included vein graft interposition in 39 (63%), primary anastomosis in 20 (32.3%), and lateral repair in 3 (4.8%) patients. The patients were divided into 2 study groups: limb salvage group (group 1) and amputation group (group 2). Subgroup analysis consisted of univariate analysis comparing the 2 groups and multivariate analysis examining the factors associated negatively and positively with the primary endpoint, limb salvage. In the entire cohort of patients, 60 patients (97%) were male and 2 were female (3%); the mean age was 34.1 years (16-49 years). The overall amputation rate in this study was 37.1% (23 amputations). Significant (P < 0.05) independent factors associated negatively with limb salvage were combined tibia and fibula fracture, concomitant artery and vein injury, ligation of venous injury, and lack of backflow after Fogarty catheter thrombectomy, while repair of popliteal artery and vein injury, when present, was associated with improved early limb salvage. For 40 patients, we adopt a liberal attitude toward open 4-compartment fasciotomy through both medially and laterally placed incisions. Expeditious recognition of vascular injury, transport to repair, and repair of associated venous injury when possible are necessary to optimize limb salvage. The importance of a high level of suspicion and low threshold for timely amputation has been emphasized when limb salvage was deemed impossible to prevent life-threatening complication. Delays in surgery, extensive soft tissue defect, compound tibia-fibula fracture, and other factors are associated with high amputation rate following popliteal artery injury.

Persistent popliteal fossa reflux following saphenopopliteal disconnection.

This was a retrospective assessment of the technical adequacy of saphenopopliteal disconnection (SPD). Patients scheduled for SPD underwent preoperative colour-coded duplex imaging to localize the saphenopopliteal junction (SPJ). Operations were conducted with the patients under general anaesthesia in the prone position with planned full popliteal fossa exposure. Patients were reimaged 6 weeks after operation. Some 69 patients had surgery over 4 years; complete data were available for 59 (27 men and 32 women, median age 55 (range 27-78) years). There were eight staged bilateral procedures. Postoperative duplex scans identified 23 (39 per cent) with ideal results (incompetent SPJ successfully disconnected), 12 (20 per cent) with satisfactory results (incompetent SPJ disconnected successfully but persisting venous reflux in superficial veins), eight duplex failures (14 per cent) (previously identified incompetent SPJ persisted but was competent after operation) and 13 surgical failures (22 per cent) (incompetent SPJ completely missed during surgery). There were three major postoperative complications (5 per cent) (two deep vein thromboses and one popliteal vein injury) and one patient suffered a sural nerve palsy. Despite preoperative duplex localization of the SPJ, SPD proved an unreliable technique in this series.

Gunshot injuries of the popliteal artery.

Guidelines for the management of popliteal artery trauma emanate mainly from military experience. This study was undertaken to describe the management of popliteal injuries in a civilian vascular surgical unit with a large trauma workload. A retrospective review of records of patients treated between 1983 and 1997 was undertaken. Some 117 popliteal artery gunshot injuries were treated (83 low velocity, 16 high velocity, 18 shotgun). Associated fractures occurred in 44 patients and 40 had popliteal vein injuries. Treatment of the arterial injury included vein graft interposition in 71, primary reanastomosis in 19, prosthetic graft interposition in four, lateral suture in one, vein patch in one and ligation in one patient; 84 fasciotomies were performed. No perioperative deaths occurred. There were 20 primary and 14 secondary amputations. Factors associated with amputation were high-velocity injuries, delay in revascularization in excess of 7 h, arterial transection, associated fracture, and compartment syndrome or muscle infarction. Civilian popliteal gunshot injuries are attended by a high amputation rate. Prompt resuscitation and revascularization appear to be the only correctable factors that may improve limb salvage rates.

Early Diagnosis and Repair of Popliteal Artery and Vein Injuries Occurring During Arthroscopy of the Knee

Injuries to the popliteal vessels during arthroscopic procedures of the knee are rare but may lead to amputation of the extremity. Early recognition and repair of such injuries is essential to avoid this complication. Two cases of patients who sustained injuries to the popliteal artery and vein during arthroscopy and were diagnosed and definitively treated within hours of the injury are reported. Both patients underwent urgent repair of the lacerated artery and vein and had good perfusion and function of the lower limb postoperatively. When the possibility of arthroscopic injury to the popliteal vessels exists, the diagnosis and treatment are straightforward. Early repair may avoid the disastrous complication of amputation of the affected leg.

Acute Treatment of Penetrating Popliteal Artery Trauma: The Importance of Soft Tissue Injury

During a 20-year period from 1973 to 1992, 109 patients underwent early operation for acute popliteal artery trauma. Clinical variables were analyzed for their association with amputation. Gunshot wounds accounted for the majority of injuries (73%), followed by shotgun wounds (18%), stab wounds (6%), iatrogenic injuries (2%), and lacerations (1%). Fasciotomies were performed selectively in 41% of patients. Seven patients (6%) lost the injured extremity despite arterial repair. The mean time from injury to arterial repair was not significantly different for patients with or without subsequent amputation (8.6 +/- 3.6 and 9.7 +/- 7.4 hours, respectively; p = 0.69). Delay in diagnosis longer than 6 or 12 hours after the injury did not increase the risk of amputation. Other factors not associated with limb loss were preoperative ischemic neurologic deficit or compartmental hypertension, concomitant fracture, and popliteal vein injury. Severe soft tissue injury (p < 0.0001) or postoperative wound sepsis (p < 0.0001) substantially increased the risk of amputation. Delayed fasciotomies were uncommon (4%) but were associated with a significantly increased risk of amputation (p < 0.0001). Vein grafting for arterial repair (p = 0.0017) and shotgun injuries (p < 0.0001) were associated with amputation to the extent that they were related to severe soft tissue injury. The degree of soft tissue trauma and subsequent infection of devitalized tissue limits the success of popliteal arterial repair. Changes in the mechanism of trauma, liberal use of four-compartment fasciotomies, and aggressive management of soft tissue injury resulted in a significant decline in the amputation rate from 21% (4/19) in the first 5 years to 0% (0/39) in the last 5 years of the study.

MANAGEMENT OF LOWER EXTREMITY ARTERIAL TRAUMA

Extremity vascular trauma is common in most urban trauma centers and controversy remains about the optimal management of arterial injuries. We examined the records of 188 patients who had lower extremity arterial trauma from September 1987 to April 1992 to help clarify these issues. There were 142 (75.5%) gunshot wounds, 18 (9.6%) stab wounds, 5 (2.7%) shotgun wounds, and 23 (12.2%) patients with blunt trauma. There were 43 (22.9%) associated venous injuries. There were 10 repair failures in the acute postoperative period. There were no repair failures for the iliac artery. Three failures involved the superficial femoral artery (SFA), six were popliteal, and one tibial. Vein and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts were used to repair the SFA with equal success. Repair of the popliteal artery with PTFE failed in four of five cases, while vein grafts failed in only 2 of 19 cases (p < 0.01). Graft failure was associated with blunt trauma in 8 of 23 patients (35%), and always resulted in amputation. Penetrating injuries accounted for only 2 of 165 (1.2%) failures and were successfully redone with no amputations. Venous injury was present in all SFA failures. Popliteal vein injury was present in two PTFE and two vein grafts that failed. There were no infections of vein or PTFE grafts. In conclusion, PTFE and vein have equal graft patency for the repair of the iliac and femoral arteries. However, the patency of PTFE was significantly worse in the popliteal location. Vein grafts should be used for repair of this vessel. Graft failure and amputation were more common with popliteal and tibial injuries from blunt mechanisms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)