The Noncompliant Substance Abuser JR is a combative, young white female who presents in the Emergency Room disoriented, with a fever, chills, and a cough productive of yellow sputum. She complains of chest pain and shortness of breath. JR is well known to the medical staff. She has had three previous admissions with endocarditis and interrupted her clinical course on two of those admissions by leaving the hospital against medical advice. On her most recept previous admission, her mitral valve was replaced with a porcine prosthesis. She also tested HIV positive (but was and remains asymptomatic for AIDS). JR's social history includes occasional prostitution, IV substance abuse (cocaine), and needle-sharing. Although JR had been referred repeatedly to the substance abuse shelter, she refused counseling. With a diagnosis of pneumonia, Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, and a mitral valve vegetation and mild insufficiency, JR is placed on appropriate IV antibiotics and hospitalized. On the third hospital day, JR is much improved. She is calmer, less combative, and seems resigned to the clinical course as outlined to her by her attending physician (four to six weeks of IV antibiotic therapy). On hospital day 10 JR has a low-grade fever but otherwise feels much improved. She begins to show signs of irritability. She quarrels with her medical resident and nurse about the necessity of remaining in the hospital. On hospital day 11 JR objects to receiving medical direction from the medical resident and demands to see her real doctor. The attending physician is called. JR tells him that she can't stand being confined to the ward. She says that she feels well enough for discharge. The attending points out that the growth on her prosthetic heart valve, while reduced in size, remains. He explains that the bacteria growing in her blood is especially dangerous and that a more extended clinical course is medically indicated. He warns JR that she risks death if she cuts off her clinical course prematurely. JR trivializes his warnings, saying, I'm under a death sentence anyhow. On day 12, JR walks out against medical advice. Two days later, JR again presents to the Emergency Room with a fever, shortness of breath, and a rapid heart rate. A repeat echocardiogram shows worsened mitral valve incompetence and heavier regurgitation. Replacement of the prosthetic valve is recommended. JR's attending physician points out the contraindications of JR's poor surgical risk status and her record for recidivism. A consultation with the hospital ethics committee is sought. After a thorough review, the committee offers the opinion that it would not be unethical to replace JR's damage heart valve. Surgery is scheduled. JR tolerates surgery better than expected. Her course of antibiotics is resumed. In hope of achieving better compliance, JR is fitted with a PRN adapter (an indwelling catheter permitting direct IV access) and given instructions for self-administering her antibiotics at home. On the fifteenth day after surgery, JR is discharged, scheduled for a follow-up clinical appointment in two days. JR misses her appointment. Four weeks after discharge, JR presents yet again in the Emergency Room, with a fever and shortness of breath. Clinical signs indicate that her second valve replacement has failed. (JR admits to using the PRN adapter for cocaine). An echocardiogram shows heavy mitral regurgitation and a perivalvular abscess. She is growing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in her blood. JR demands another valve, saying it would violate her civil rights to be refused. Would it be wrong to refuse her? COMMENTARY Patients like JR frustrate doctors and nurses no end. These patients are pejoratively referred to as dirtballs, especially by residents. Sometimes attending physicians tell their residents that the best they can hope for in caring for such a patient is to learn how to insert a subclavian line when her blood pressure drops. …