CYP2D6 Poor Metabolizers Research Articles

Pharmacogenomics of Cognitive Dysfunction and Neuropsychiatric Disorders in Dementia.

Symptomatic interventions for patients with dementia involve anti-dementia drugs to improve cognition, psychotropic drugs for the treatment of behavioral disorders (BDs), and different categories of drugs for concomitant disorders. Demented patients may take >6–10 drugs/day with the consequent risk for drug–drug interactions and adverse drug reactions (ADRs >80%) which accelerate cognitive decline. The pharmacoepigenetic machinery is integrated by pathogenic, mechanistic, metabolic, transporter, and pleiotropic genes redundantly and promiscuously regulated by epigenetic mechanisms. CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP3A4/5 geno-phenotypes are involved in the metabolism of over 90% of drugs currently used in patients with dementia, and only 20% of the population is an extensive metabolizer for this tetragenic cluster. ADRs associated with anti-dementia drugs, antipsychotics, antidepressants, anxiolytics, hypnotics, sedatives, and antiepileptic drugs can be minimized by means of pharmacogenetic screening prior to treatment. These drugs are substrates, inhibitors, or inducers of 58, 37, and 42 enzyme/protein gene products, respectively, and are transported by 40 different protein transporters. APOE is the reference gene in most pharmacogenetic studies. APOE-3 carriers are the best responders and APOE-4 carriers are the worst responders; likewise, CYP2D6-normal metabolizers are the best responders and CYP2D6-poor metabolizers are the worst responders. The incorporation of pharmacogenomic strategies for a personalized treatment in dementia is an effective option to optimize limited therapeutic resources and to reduce unwanted side-effects.

Tamsulosin Associated with Interstitial Lung Damage in CYP2D6 Variant Alleles Carriers.

Drugs are serious but underestimated causative agents of interstitial lung disease (ILD). Both cytotoxic and immune mechanisms may be involved in drug-induced ILD (DI-ILD). We aimed to investigate whether polymorphisms of relevant CYP enzymes involved in the metabolization of tamsulosin might explain the pathologic mechanism of the DI-ILD in the cases with suspected tamsulosin DI-ILD. We collected 22 tamsulosin-associated DI-ILD cases at two ILD Expertise Centers in the Netherlands between 2009 and 2020. CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP3A4, and CYP3A5 single nucleotide polymorphisms were genotyped and compared with a control group of 78 healthy Caucasian male volunteers. Nine cases were phenotyped as CYP2D6 poor metabolizers and 13 as CYP2D6 intermediate metabolizers. The phenotypes of the cases differed significantly from those of the healthy controls, with more poor metabolizers. After withdrawal of tamsulosin, the pulmonary condition of three cases had improved, six patients had stabilized, and one patient stabilized after reducing the tamsulosin dose. The described 22 cases suggest that an association between the presence of CYP2D6 allelic variants and tamsulosin-associated ILD is highly likely. These cases highlight the importance of both clinical and genetic risk stratification aimed to achieve a more accurate prevention of DI-ILD in the future and enhance the quality of life of patients.

CYP2D6 polymorphism and its impact on the clinical response to metoprolol: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

CYP2D6 genetic polymorphisms are associated with metoprolol pharmacokinetics. Whether the clinical response to metoprolol is also affected remains uncertain. We conducted a systematic review on the effects of CYP2D6 polymorphism on the clinical response to metoprolol. Searches were conducted using MEDLINE. Meta-analyses were performed on the impact of CYP2D6-inferred phenotypes on heart rate (HR) reduction, diastolic (DBP) and systolic (SBP) blood pressure reduction, average daily doses, all-type adverse events and bradycardia. Our qualitative assessment indicated inconsistent results in individual studies and endpoints, but CYP2D6 poor metabolizers (PM) generally presented a greater reduction in HR. The meta-analysis of 15 studies, including a total of 1146 individuals, found a reduction in HR of 3 beats/min (P = .017), and of SBP and DBP by 3 mmHg (P = .0048) for PM compared to non-PM individuals using similar metoprolol doses. Bradycardia appeared more frequent by 4-fold for PM, although significant heterogeneity was observed regarding bradycardia, which limits the scope of this finding. Patients without any CYP2D6 metabolic capacities appear to have increased reduction in DBP, HR and SBP during metoprolol treatment and may be at a higher risk of bradycardia compared to patients with active CYP2D6 phenotypes. Further prospective data are required to determine whether CYP2D6 is associated with clinical events in patients treated with metoprolol, as well as to demonstrate the clinical utility of an individualized approach of prescribing metoprolol using CYP2D6-inferred phenotypes.

Toxicokinetic Studies and Analytical Toxicology of the New Synthetic Opioids Cyclopentanoyl-Fentanyl and Tetrahydrofuranoyl-Fentanyl.

The growing number of new synthetic opioids (NSO) on the new psychoactive substances (NPS) market bears new challenges in toxicology. As their toxicodynamics and particularly their toxicokinetics are usually unknown, impact on human health is not yet fully understood. Detection of the 2 NSO cyclopentanoyl-fentanyl (CP-F) and tetrahydrofuranoyl-fentanyl (THF-F) was first reported in 2016. Both were involved in several fatal intoxication cases, but no detailed information about their toxicological characteristics is available so far. The main purpose of this study was therefore to investigate the in vitro toxicokinetics and in vivo analytical toxicology of CP-F and THF-F by means of liquid chromatography high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS/MS). These studies included metabolic stability, phase I and II metabolism, isozyme mapping, plasma protein binding and detectability in LC-HRMS/MS standard urine screening approaches (SUSA) using rat urine samples. In total, 12 phase I metabolites of CP-F and 13 of THF-F were identified, among them 9 metabolites described for the first time. Overall, N-dealkylations, hydroxylations and dihydroxylations were the main metabolic reactions. The cytochrome P450 (CYP) isozymes mainly involved were CYP2D6 and CYP3A4, leading to elevated drug levels and intoxications in CYP2D6 poor metabolizers. CP-F showed a high plasma protein binding of 99%, which may increase the risk of toxicity by simultaneous intake of other highly bound drugs. Detectability studies showed that neither the parent compounds nor their metabolites were detectable in rat urine using LC-HRMS/MS SUSA. However, a more sophisticated analytical strategy was successfully applied and should be used for analytical confirmation of an intake of CP-F and/or THF-F.

Effects of paroxetine, ketoconazole, and rifampin on the metabolism of eliglustat, an oral substrate reduction therapy for Gaucher disease type 1

Eliglustat is an oral glucosylceramide synthase inhibitor indicated for the long-term treatment of adults with Gaucher disease type 1 and CYP2D6 extensive, intermediate, or poor metabolizer phenotypes. Eliglustat is metabolized primarily by CYP2D6 and to a lesser extent by CYP3A4 and is a substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp). Three studies evaluated the effects of paroxetine (strong CYP2D6 inhibitor), ketoconazole (strong CYP3A4 and P-gp inhibitor), and rifampin (strong CYP3A4/P-gp inducer; OATP inhibitor) on the pharmacokinetics of orally administered eliglustat in healthy adults. An 8.9-fold increase in eliglustat exposure following co-administration of multiple-dose eliglustat and paroxetine is attributed to inhibition of CYP2D6-mediated metabolism of eliglustat by paroxetine. A 4.3-fold increase in eliglustat exposure following co-administration of multiple-dose eliglustat and ketoconazole is attributed to inhibition of CYP3A4-mediated metabolism and/or P-gp-mediated transport of eliglustat by ketoconazole. Co-administration of eliglustat with oral doses of rifampin reduced eliglustat exposure by >85% due to induction of CYP3A4/P-gp by rifampin, while a single intravenous dose of rifampin had no effect on eliglustat, confirming that eliglustat is not an OATP substrate. Depending on CYP2D6 metabolizer phenotype, co-administration of eliglustat with CYP2D6 and/or CYP3A inhibitors or CYP3A inducers may alter eliglustat exposure, warrant dosage adjustment or use with caution, or be contraindicated.

Pharmacogene Variation in Thai Plasmodium vivax Relapse Patients Treated with a Combination of Primaquine and Chloroquine.

PurposePharmacogenes have an influence on biotransformation pathway and clinical outcome of primaquine and chloroquine which are often prescribed to treat Plasmodium vivax infection. Genetic variation may impact enzyme activity and/or transporter function and thereby contribute to relapse. The aim of the study was to assess allele, genotype frequencies and the association between pharmacogenes variation and primaquine response in Thai patients infected with Plasmodium vivax.Patients and MethodsFifty-one patients were genotyped for 74 variants in 18 genes by Sequenom MassARRAY® and Taqman® SNP Real-Time PCR.ResultsSNP frequencies were not significantly different between relapse (n=4) and non-relapse (n=47) patients. However, the CYP2C19 c.681G>A, the frequency of the A-allele that defines the non-functional CYP2C19*2 haplotype was significantly higher compared to the G-allele (OR=5.14, p=0.021). Patients heterozygous for ABCG2 c.421C>A had a higher odds ratio (OR=8.75, p=0.071) and the frequency of the G-allele of UGT2B7 c.372G>A was higher compared to the A-allele (OR=3.75, p=0.081). CYP2C19, ABCG2 and UGT2B7 emerged as potential high priority genes.ConclusionDecreased activity of CYP2C19, ABCG2 and UGT2B7 in combination with CYP2D6 intermediate or poor metabolizer status may expose patients to a higher risk of Plasmodium vivax relapse. Further investigations are warranted to substantiate these findings.

CYP2D6 Genotype Predicts Tamoxifen Discontinuation and Prognosis in Patients With Breast Cancer.

PURPOSETo examine the association between CYP2D6 genotype, discontinuation of tamoxifen therapy, and prognosis for breast cancer.PATIENTS AND METHODSWe conducted a prospective-retrospective study linking data from a clinical breast cancer register, the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register, and self-reported questionnaires. We genotyped CYP2D6 in 1,309 patients with breast cancer who were treated with tamoxifen and were diagnosed from 2005 to 2012; they were categorized as poor, intermediate, normal, or ultrarapid CYP2D6 metabolizers. We investigated whether metabolizer status was associated with tamoxifen discontinuation and prognosis for breast cancer using Cox regression analysis.RESULTSThe 6-month discontinuation rates of tamoxifen among poor, intermediate, normal, and ultrarapid CYP2D6 metabolizers were 7.1%, 7.6%, 6.7%, and 18.8%, respectively. A U-shaped association was found between CYP2D6 metabolizer status and breast cancer–specific mortality, with adjusted hazard ratios of 2.59 (95% CI, 1.01 to 6.67) for poor, 1.48 (95% CI, 0.72 to 3.05) for intermediate, 1 (reference) for normal, and 4.52 (95% CI, 1.42 to 14.37) for ultrarapid CYP2D6 metabolizers.CONCLUSIONBoth poor and ultrarapid CYP2D6 metabolizers of tamoxifen have a worse prognosis for breast cancer compared with normal metabolizers after receiving a standard dose of tamoxifen. This U-shaped association might call for individualized tamoxifen dosage.

P.799 Quantification of antidepressant and antipsychotic exposure increase caused by CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 intermediate and poor metabolizer status by meta-analysis

This preliminary study aimed to determine whether augmented renal clearance (ARC) impacts negatively on the clinical outcome in traumatic brain-injured patients (TBI) treated for a first episode of ventilator-acquired pneumonia (VAP).During a 5-year period, all TBI patients who had developed VAP were retrospectively reviewed to assess variables associated with clinical failure in multivariate analysis. Clinical failure was defined as an impaired clinical response with a need for escalating antibiotics during treatment and/or within 15 days after the end-of-treatment. Recurrence was considered if at least one of the initial causative bacterial strains was growing at a significant concentration from a second sample. Augmented renal clearance (ARC) was defined by an enhanced creatinine clearance exceeding 130 mL/min/1.73 m2 calculated from a urinary sample during the first three days of antimicrobial therapy.During the study period, 223 TBI patients with VAP were included and 59 (26%) presented a clinical failure. Factors statistically associated with clinical failure were GSC ≤ 7 (OR = 2.2 [1.1–4.4], P = 0.03), early VAP (OR = 3.9 [1.9–7.8], P = 0.0001), bacteraemia (OR = 11 [2.2–54], P = 0.003) and antimicrobial therapy ≤ 7 days (OR = 3.7 [1.8–7.4], P = 0.0003). ARC was statistically associated with recurrent infections with an OR of 4.4 [1.2–16], P = 0.03.ARC was associated with recurrent infection after a first episode of VAP in TBI patients. The optimal administration and dosing of the antimicrobial agents in this context remain to be determined.

Clinically Significant Drug-Drug Interactions with Agents for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

This article provides an overview of the pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) for agents prescribed for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Polypharmacy in the treatment of patients with ADHD leads to high exposures to DDIs and possibly adverse safety outcomes. We performed a systematic search of DDI reports for ADHD agents in Embase and Medline. We also searched for agents in the pharmacological pipeline, which include (1) mazindol, molindone and viloxazine, which were previously prescribed for other indications; (2) centanafadine and AR-08, never before approved; and (3) two extracts (Polygala tenuifolia extract and the French maritime pine bark extracts). The identified literature included case reports, cross-sectional, cross-over and placebo-controlled studies of patient cohorts and healthy volunteers. The DDIs were classified as follows: ADHD agents acting as perpetrators, i.e., affecting the clearance of co-prescribed agents (victim drugs), or ADHD agents being the victim drugs, being affected by other agents. Ratios for changes in pharmacokinetic parameters before and after the DDI were used as a rough estimate of the extent of the DDI. Alcohol may increase plasma dextroamphetamine concentrations by presystemic effects. Until studies are done to orient clinicians regarding dosing changes, clinicians need to be aware of the potential for cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 inhibitors to increase amphetamine levels, which is equivalent to increasing dosages. Atomoxetine is a wide therapeutic window drug. The CYP2D6 poor metabolizers who do not have CYP2D6 activity had better atomoxetine response, but also an increased risk of adverse effects. CYP2D6 inhibitors have been used to increase atomoxetine response in CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers. Guanfacine is mainly metabolized by CYP3A4, which can be induced and inhibited. The package insert recommends that in guanfacine-treated patients, after adding potent CYP3A4 inducers, the guanfacine dose should be doubled; after adding potent CYP3A4 inhibitors the guanfacine dose should be halved. Based on a phenobarbital case report and our experience with CYP3A4-metabolized antipsychotics, these correction factors may be too low. According to two case reports, carbamazepine is a clinically relevant inducer of methylphenidate (MPH). A case series study suggested that MPH may be associated with important elevations in imipramine concentrations. Due to the absence of or limitations in the data, no comments for clinicians can be provided on the pharmacokinetic DDIs for clonidine, centanafadine, mazindol, molindone, AR-08, P. tenuifolia extract and the French maritime pine bark extracts. According to currently available data, clinicians should not expect that ADHD drugs modify each other's serum concentrations. A summary table for clinicians provides our current recommendations on pharmacokinetic DDIs of ADHD agents based on our literature review and the package inserts; whenever it was possible, we provide information on serum concentrations and dose correction factors. There will be a need to periodically update these recommendations and these correction factors as new knowledge becomes available.

Impact of hepatic and renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of eliglustat therapy for Gaucher disease type 1

Eliglustat is a first-line oral therapy for adults with Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1) who have extensive (EM), intermediate (IM), or poor (PM) CYP2D6 metabolizer phenotypes. It was initially not recommended in GD1 patients with hepatic or renal impairment due to insufficient data. Two Phase 1 studies (NCT02536937/NCT02536911) evaluated the effects of hepatic and renal impairment on pharmacokinetics and tolerability following a single 84-mg dose of eliglustat. Compared to matched healthy EM subjects (n = 7 for both studies), geometric means for eliglustat maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration versus time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC) were not substantially different in EMs with mild hepatic impairment (n = 6), higher in EMs with moderate hepatic impairment (n = 7), and similar in EMs with severe renal impairment (n = 7). Higher exposures of eliglustat at steady-state were predicted using a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model in EMs with mild or moderate hepatic impairment compared with normal hepatic function after repeated 84-mg eliglustat doses. Higher exposures of eliglustat were also predicted in EMs with mild hepatic impairment after coadministration with a CYP2D6 or CYP3A inhibitor with repeated doses. Based on these results, the eliglustat drug label was revised for patients with hepatic or renal impairment.

Biomarker Response to Oral Eliglustat in Adults with Gaucher Disease Type 1: Results from 4 Completed Clinical Trials

INTRODUCTION: Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1) is caused by hereditary deficiency in activity of lysosomal acid β-glucosidase and lysosomal dysfunction due to abnormal recycling and storage of glycosphingolipids especially in tissue macrophages. Clinical manifestations can include anemia, thrombocytopenia, hepatosplenomegaly, and debilitating bone disease. Hematologists care for most patients with GD1 but may be unaware of the importance of plasma biomarkers not only as tissue response surrogates that are useful for monitoring treatment efficacy but also as pathogenic molecules that can directly contribute to disease manifestations. These biomarkers include chitotriosidase, macrophage inflammatory protein 1β (MIP-1β), glucosylceramide, glucosylsphingosine, and monosialodihexosyl ganglioside (GM3). Here we show differing changes in biomarker levels after inception of eliglustat therapy in treatment-naïve GD1 patients and in patients previously treated with enzyme replacement therapy (ERT). Eliglustat is an oral inhibitor of glucosylceramide biosynthesis approved by FDA as a first-line treatment of adults with GD1 who have extensive, intermediate, or poor CYP2D6 metabolizer phenotypes (>90% of patients). METHODS: We evaluated percent change from baseline in biomarker levels during time on eliglustat in the 4 completed clinical trials of oral eliglustat for GD1 adults (Sanofi Genzyme): Phase 2/NCT00358150 (treatment-naïve patients with moderate to severe baseline disease, N=26); Phase 3 ENGAGE/NCT00891202 (treatment-naïve patients with mild to moderate baseline disease, N=40); Phase 3 ENCORE/NCT00943111 (switch patients at prespecified therapeutic goals stabilized after a mean of 10 years of ERT], N=159); Phase 3 EDGE/NCT01074944 (mixture of treatment-naïve [N=22] and ERT-switch patients [N=148] with mild to moderate baseline disease and variable prior time on ERT). All percentages were calculated in the subset of patients with biomarkers measured at baseline and the reported timepoint. The attrition of patients with data at the longer-term time points is attributable primarily to a combination of 2-year enrollment periods, trial design, and protocol-mandated switches to commercial therapy for US patients. Most patients (81%) continued until eliglustat became commercially available or completion of their trial; 9 patients (2.3% overall) withdrew due to adverse events reported as drug-related. For Phase 2, ENGAGE, and ENCORE, chitotriosidase genotypes were obtained and values were normalized; patients homozygous for the CHIT null mutation were excluded and values for heterozygous patients were doubled. For EDGE patients, chitotriosidase genotype data were not obtained but patients with ≥4 zero values (n=12) were excluded. RESULTS: In treatment-naïve patients, all biomarkers were elevated at baseline. Median levels of glucosylceramide, GM3, and MIP-1β normalized within 1 year of starting eliglustat. Chitotriosidase and glucosylsphingosine levels markedly decreased but did not normalize. After 3-8 years on treatment, median percent reduction in chitotriosidase and glucosylsphingosine (Phase 2 and ENGAGE) was 85-92% (Table) but values did not normalize. In patients switching from ERT, median chitotriosidase was still modestly elevated at baseline. Median values for other biomarkers were normal or near normal. After 1 year of treatment, chitotriosidase decreased (Table). Median glucosylceramide, GM3, and MIP-1β remained normal or normalized. After 3-4 years, GM3 and MIP-1β remained normal. Median percent reduction in chitotriosidase from baseline was 60-63% but values did not normalize. Eliglustat was generally well-tolerated in all 4 trials; 97% of adverse events were mild/moderate and 86% considered unrelated to eliglustat by the investigator. CONCLUSIONS: Gaucher disease biomarkers decreased substantially in treatment-naïve patients after eliglustat treatment. In switch patients, including very stable patients after a mean of 10 years on ERT, chitotriosidase and MIP-1β also decreased substantively after eliglustat treatment. Future longitudinal follow-up of eliglustat-treated patients should indicate whether the biomarker and plasma glycosphingolipid responses reported here in stable patients at long-term therapeutic goals are associated with immunological and clinical improvements. Disclosures Weinreb: Shire HGT: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Cox:Sanofi Genzyme: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Reimbursement, Research Funding. Mistry:Sanofi Genzyme: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Reimbursement, Research Funding; NIH NIMS: Research Funding; Shire: Honoraria, Other: Travel Reimbursement, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Other: Travel Reimbursement; Synageva: Honoraria, Other: Travel Reimbursement. Charrow:BioMarin: Research Funding; Shire: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amicus: Research Funding. Lukina:JSC GENERIUM: Research Funding; Sanofi Genzyme: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Reimbursement, Research Funding; Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Reimbursement. Foster:Sanofi Genzyme: Employment. Peterschmitt:Sanofi Genzyme: Employment.

Pharmacogenomics: Personalizing palliative pharmacotherapy.

126 Background: Pharmacogenomics (PGx) is a developing field in individualized medicine concerned with understanding genetic polymorphisms that may explain inter-individual variation in drug efficacy and toxicity. Understanding these polymorphisms is a key tool in guiding clinician’s selection and dosing of specific medications to optimally manage patient symptoms. Common pharmacogenes that impact analgesic prescribing include: CYP2D6, OPRM1, and COMT; for mood disorders: CYP2C19. This cross-sectional study explored the activity of pharmacogenes of clinical significance in palliative medicine with either Level 1 or 2 evidence. Methods: We performed PGx testing on 50 new referrals to the palliative medicine clinic with an active malignancy. Each patient underwent PGx testing with clinical pharmacist review and interpretation prior to their initial office appointment. Results: In our cohort 54% were men and the mean age was 64.7 (24-87). The average number of medications, medication allergies, and creatinine clearance were 10.5 (1-22), 1.3 (0-13), and 78.4 (31-120), respectively. Among the pharmacogenes impacting opiate and antiemetic prescribing, 14% (7/50) of patients were poor metabolizers of CYP2D6 and 8% (4/50) were rapid or ultra-rapid metabolizers. Another 60% (30/50) showed intermediate metabolism which would impact initial dosing. Poor metabolism of COMT or OPRM1 was seen in 8% (4/50) with another 36% (18/50) demonstrating rapid metabolism. Activity for the pharmacogene CYP2C19, which impacts many psychotropics, revealed 32% (16/50) rapid or ultra-rapid metabolizers and no poor metabolizers. Overall, 66% (33/50) of patients had pharmacogene activity suggestive of significant clinical impact necessitating either drug avoidance due to toxicity risks or substantial dose adjustment to be efficacious. Conclusions: Polymorphisms impacting pharmacotherapy were common in our cohort. Patients with difficult-to-control symptoms or multiple medication toxicities can utilize PGx testing as a guide to symptom relief. As PGx technology becomes readily accessible and economical, opportunities for patients to have precision genomic information guide healthcare decisions is expected to increase.

Highly Variable Pharmacokinetics of Tyramine in Humans and Polymorphisms in OCT1, CYP2D6, and MAO-A.

Tyramine, formed by the decarboxylation of tyrosine, is a natural constituent of numerous food products. As an indirect sympathomimetic, it can have potentially dangerous hypertensive effects. In vitro data indicated that the pharmacokinetics of tyramine possibly depend on the organic cation transporter OCT1 genotype and on the CYP2D6 genotype. Since tyramine is a prototypic substrate of monoamine oxidase A (MAO-A), genetic polymorphisms in MAO-A may also be relevant. The aims of this study were to identify to what extent the interindividual variation in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tyramine is determined by genetic polymorphisms in OCT1, CYP2D6, and MAO-A. Beyond that, we wanted to evaluate tyramine as probe drug for the in vivo activity of MAO-A and OCT1. Therefore, the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics of tyramine were studied in 88 healthy volunteers after oral administration of a 400 mg dose. We observed a strong interindividual variation in systemic tyramine exposure, with a mean AUC of 3.74 min*µg/ml and a high mean CL/F ratio of 107 l/min. On average, as much as 76.8% of the dose was recovered in urine in form of the MAO-catalysed metabolite 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid (4-HPAA), confirming that oxidative deamination by MAO-A is the quantitatively most relevant metabolic pathway. Systemic exposure of 4-HPAA varied only up to 3-fold, indicating no strong heritable variation in peripheral MAO-A activity. Systolic blood pressure increased by more than 10 mmHg in 71% of the volunteers and correlated strongly with systemic tyramine concentration. In less than 10% of participants, individually variable blood pressure peaks by >40 mmHg above baseline were observed at tyramine concentrations of >60 µg/l. Unexpectedly, the functionally relevant polymorphisms in OCT1 and CYP2D6, including the CYP2D6 poor and ultra-rapid metaboliser genotypes, did not significantly affect tyramine pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics. Also, the MOA-A genotypes, which had been associated in several earlier studies with neuropsychiatric phenotypes, had no significant effects on tyramine pharmacokinetics or its metabolism to 4-HPAA. Thus, variation in tyramine pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics is not explained by obvious genomic variation, and human tyramine metabolism did not indicate the existence of ultra-low or -high MAO-A activity.

Impact of age and CYP2D6 genetics on exposure of aripiprazole and dehydroaripiprazole in patients using long-acting injectable versus oral formulation: relevance of poor and intermediate metabolizer status.

Tailoring medication dosing for the individual patient is complex, and many factors can influence drug exposure. We investigated the effect of age and CYP2D6 genotype on aripiprazole and dehydroaripiprazole exposure in patients using long-acting injectable (LAI) or oral aripiprazole. Matched data on serum concentration of aripiprazole and CYP2D6 genotype of patients using oral or LAI aripiprazole were included retrospectively from a therapeutic drug monitoring service. The patients were divided into the following CYP2D6 genotype-defined categories: poor metabolizers (PMs), intermediate metabolizers (IMs), normal metabolizers (NMs), and ultrarapid metabolizers (UMs). Linear mixed model analyses were used to evaluate the impact of CYP2D6 genotype on dose-adjusted serum concentrations of the active moiety of aripiprazole+dehydroaripiprazole in relation to age and formulation. We identified 635 patients (mean age = 40.1 years, 9.4% ≥ 65 years, 53.7% females) using LAI (n = 166) or oral formulation (n = 469). The genotype-predicted CYP2D6 phenotype subgroups were 2.4% UMs, 82.0% NMs, 8.0% IMs, and 7.2% PMs. Age did not significantly affect exposure of the active moiety of aripiprazole+dehydroaripiprazole in the LAI (p = 0.071) or oral (p = 0.14) subgroups. Compared with CYP2D6 NMs, PMs and IMs had significantly increased exposure of the active moiety of aripiprazole+dehydroaripiprazole in the LAI (1.7-fold higher, p < 0.001, and 1.5-fold higher, p < 0.001) and oral (1.7-fold higher, p < 0.001, and 1.6-fold higher, p < 0.001) subgroups. In conclusion, doses should be adjusted according to CYP2D6 genotype when initiating treatment with aripiprazole LAI or tablets, while advanced age do not affect the exposure of the active moiety of aripiprazole treatment regardless of formulation.

CYP2D6 Genotype-guided Metoprolol Therapy in Cardiac Surgery Patients: Rationale and Design of the Pharmacogenetic-guided Metoprolol Management for Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation in Cardiac Surgery (PREEMPTIVE) Pilot Study

The Preemptive Pharmacogenetic-guided Metoprolol Management for Atrial Fibrillation in Cardiac Surgery (PREEMPTIVE) pilot trial aims to use existing institutional resources to develop a process for integrating CYP2D6 pharmacogenetic test results into the patient electronic health record, to develop an evidence-based clinical decision support tool to facilitate CYP2D6 genotype-guided metoprolol administration in the cardiac surgery setting, and to determine the impact of implementing this CYP2D6 genotype-guided integrated approach on the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF), provider, and cost outcomes. One-arm Bayesian adaptive design clinical trial. Single center, university hospital. The authors will screen (including CYP2D6 genotype) up to 600 (264 ± 144 expected under the adaptive design) cardiac surgery patients, and enroll up to 200 (88 ± 48 expected) poor, intermediate, and ultrarapid CYP2D6 metabolizers over a period of 2 years at a tertiary academic center. All consented and enrolled patients will receive the intervention of CYP2D6 genotype-guided metoprolol management based on CYP2D6 phenotype classified as a poor, intermediate, extensive (normal), or ultrarapid metabolizer. The primary outcome will be the incidence of postoperative AF. Secondary outcomes relating to rates of CYP2D6 genotype-guided prescription changes, costs, lengths of stay, and implementation metrics also will be investigated. The PREEMPTIVE pilot study is the first perioperative pilot trial to provide essential information for the design of a future, large-scale trial comparing CYP2D6 genotype-guided metoprolol management with a nontailored strategy in terms of managing AF. In addition, secondary outcomes regarding implementation, clinical benefit, safety, and cost-effectiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery will be examined.

The effect of the CYP2D6 genotype on the maintenance dose of metoprolol in a chronic Dutch patient population.

Metoprolol is among the most frequently prescribed β-blockers for the treatment of various cardiovascular diseases. Genetic polymorphism within CYP2D6 has been shown to affect the rate of metabolism of metoprolol. Whether metoprolol dose adjustments are indicated in CYP2D6 poor metabolizers (PMs) has thus far not well been studied. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of the CYP2D6 genotype on the metoprolol maintenance dose in a chronic Dutch patient population. Patients were included if they were treated with metoprolol and in whom CYP2D6 genotype status was known. Patient and treatment characteristics were obtained retrospectively from the electronic healthcare records. Metoprolol maintenance dose was the primary endpoint and was defined as the last known dose that the patients had been treated with. Genotype data were categorized into four phenotypes, that is, PMs, intermediate metabolizers, extensive metabolizers, and ultra-rapid metabolizers (UMs). The endpoints were analyzed as PM versus non-PM. A total of 105 patients were included. The mean ± SD maintenance dose in PMs (n = 12) was significantly lower compared with non-PMs (n = 93), that is, 48 ± 20 versus 84 ± 53 mg, respectively (P = 0.019). No association of the CYP2D6 genotype with the incidence of side effects was observed, although there was a trend for increased risk of drowsiness (P = 0.053). The results of this study show that the CYP2D6 genotype is associated with the maintenance dose of metoprolol. Patients with the CYP2D6 PM phenotype may benefit from a lower metoprolol starting dose, followed by further dose titration to provide patient-tailored therapy and thereby increase the effectiveness of treatment.

CYP2D6-guided opioid therapy improves pain control in CYP2D6 intermediate and poor metabolizers: a pragmatic clinical trial

PurposeCYP2D6 bioactivates codeine and tramadol, with intermediate and poor metabolizers (IMs and PMs) expected to have impaired analgesia. This pragmatic proof-of-concept trial tested the effects of CYP2D6-guided opioid prescribing on pain control. MethodsParticipants with chronic pain (94% on an opioid) from seven clinics were enrolled into CYP2D6-guided (n = 235) or usual care (n = 135) arms using a cluster design. CYP2D6 phenotypes were assigned based on genotype and CYP2D6 inhibitor use, with recommendations for opioid prescribing made in the CYP2D6-guided arm. Pain was assessed at baseline and 3 months using PROMIS® measures. ResultsOn stepwise multiple linear regression, the primary outcome of composite pain intensity (composite of current pain and worst and average pain in the past week) among IM/PMs initially prescribed tramadol/codeine (n = 45) had greater improvement in the CYP2D6-guided versus usual care arm (-1.01±1.59 vs. -0.40 ± 1.20; adj P = 0.016); 24% of CYP2D6-guided versus 0% of usual care participants reported ≥30% (clinically meaningful) reduction in the composite outcome. In contrast, among normal metabolizers prescribed tramadol or codeine at baseline, there was no difference in the change in composite pain intensity at 3 months between CYP2D6-guided (-0.61 ± 1.39) and usual care (-0.54 ± 1.69) groups (adj P = 0.540). ConclusionThese data support the potential benefits of CYP2D6-guided pain management.

Long-term adverse event profile from four completed trials of oral eliglustat in adults with Gaucher disease type 1

BackgroundEliglustat is a first-line oral treatment for adults with Gaucher disease type 1 who have an extensive, intermediate or poor CYP2D6 metabolizer phenotype (> 90% of patients). Whereas enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher disease has been widely used for more than two decades, eliglustat has only been in commercial use since 2014. Clinicians and patients want to better understand which adverse events are most commonly associated with eliglustat, as well as their severity, frequency, and duration.MethodsThis pooled analysis of treatment-emergent adverse events combines data from four completed eliglustat clinical trials involving 393 Gaucher disease type 1 patients. It represents 1400 patient-years of eliglustat exposure and a mean treatment duration of 3.6 years (maximum: 9.3 years).ResultsEighty-one percent of patients remained in their respective trial until commercial availability of eliglustat (US patients only) or until trial completion. Nine patients (2.3%) withdrew from their respective trial due to one or more adverse events reported as eliglustat treatment-related; all but one of these events were mild or moderate. Overall, 97% of adverse events were mild or moderate and 86% were reported by the investigator as unrelated to eliglustat treatment. The overall rate of adverse events decreased over time and did not increase with increasing eliglustat dose. We evaluated frequency, duration, and severity of 14 adverse event terms reported at least once as treatment-related in 2% or more of all patients: dyspepsia (5.9%), headache (5.3%), abdominal pain upper (5.1%), dizziness (5.1%), diarrhea (4.6%), nausea (4.6%), arthralgia (3.6%), constipation (3.3%), abdominal pain (2.8%), gastroesophageal reflux disease (2.8%), fatigue (2.8%), palpitations (2.8%), abdominal distension (2.5%), and gastritis (2.3%). For abdominal pain upper, diarrhea, nausea, abdominal pain, and headache events, median duration was less than 14 days. All 14 adverse event terms, except for arthralgia and headache, were reported only once per patient in more than 70% of patients experiencing the event.ConclusionsThis final pooled analysis of treatment-emergent adverse events reinforces the favorable safety profile of eliglustat. The majority of the most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events were mild or moderate, transient, and occurred only once per patient.

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling Suggests Limited Drug-Drug Interaction for Fesoterodine When Coadministered With Mirabegron.

5-Hydroxymethyl tolterodine (5-HMT; the active fesoterodine metabolite) is metabolized via the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 and CYP3A pathways. Mirabegron is a moderate CYP2D6 inhibitor and weak CYP3A inhibitor. Potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) following coadministration of these 2 overactive bladder treatments were estimated using physiologically based pharmacokinetic models, developed and verified by comparing predicted and observed pharmacokinetic profiles from clinical studies. Models predicted and verified mirabegron and desipramine (CYP2D6 substrate) and 5-HMT and ketoconazole (strong CYP3A inhibitor) DDIs. Mirabegron model-predicted mean steady-state AUC and Cmax were within 11% of clinical observations. The predicted versus observed geometric mean ratio (GMR) of AUCinf for CYP2D6 substrates desipramine and metoprolol coadministered with mirabegron 100 or 160mg once daily were 3.47 versus 3.41 and 2.97 versus 3.29, respectively, indicating that the mirabegron model can be used to predict clinical CYP2D6 inhibition. 5-HMT fractional clearance by CYP3A and CYP2D6 was verified from clinical DDI studies with a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor (ketoconazole) and inducer (rifampicin) in CYP2D6 extensive and poor metabolizers and with a moderate CYP3A inhibitor (fluconazole) in healthy volunteers. 5-HMT AUCinf and Cmax GMRs for fesoterodine DDIs were all predicted within 1.26-fold of clinical observation, providing verification for the fesoterodine substrate model. The predicted changes in 5-HMT AUCinf and Cmax ratios for 8 mg fesoterodine when coadministered with 50 mg mirabegron were 1.22-fold and 1.17-fold, respectively, relative to 8 mg fesoterodine given alone. This modest increase in 5-HMT exposures by approximately 20% is considered clinically insignificant and would not require fesoterodine dose adjustment when coadministered with mirabegron within approved daily-dose ranges.

Desmetramadol Has the Safety and Analgesic Profile of Tramadol Without Its Metabolic Liabilities: Consecutive Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active Comparator-Controlled Trials

Desmetramadol is an investigational analgesic consisting of (+) and (-) enantiomers of the tramadol metabolite O-desmethyltramadol (M1). Tramadol is racemic and exerts analgesia by monoaminergic effects of (-)-tramadol and (-)-M1, and by the opioid (+)-M1. Tramadol labeling indicates cytochrome P450 (CYP) isozyme 2D6 ultrarapid metabolizer can produce dangerous (+)-M1 levels, and CYP2D6 poor metabolizers insufficient (+)-M1 for analgesia. We hypothesized that desmetramadol could provide the safety and analgesia of tramadol without its metabolic liabilities. We conducted consecutive double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 3 segment cross-over trials A and B to investigate the steady-state pharmacokinetics and analgesia of 20 mg desmetramadol and 50 mg tramadol in 103 healthy participants without (n = 43) and with (n = 60) cotreatment with the CYP inhibitor paroxetine. In the absence of CYP inhibition (trial A), 20 mg desmetramadol and 50 mg tramadol dosed every 6 hours gave equivalent steady-state (+)-M1, similar adverse events, and analgesia significantly greater than placebo, but equal to each other. In trial B, CYP inhibition significantly depressed tramadol steady-state (+)-M1, reduced its adverse events, and led to insignificant analgesia comparable with placebo. In contrast, CYP inhibition in trial B had no deleterious effect on desmetramadol (+)-M1 or (-)-M1, which gave significant analgesia as in trial A and superior to tramadol (P = .003). Desmetramadol has the safety and efficacy of tramadol without its metabolic liabilities. ClinicalTrials.gov registrationsNCT02205554, NCT03312777 PerspectiveTo our knowledge, this is the first study of desmetramadol in humans and the first to show it provides the same safety and analgesia as tramadol, but without tramadol's metabolic liabilities and related drug–drug interactions. Desmetramadol could potentially offer expanded safety and usefulness to clinicians seeking an alternative to schedule II opioids.