CO2 removal Demand for a better way to remove carbon dioxide (CO2) from natural gas led to the creation of a new material at Rice University in Houston that does something unprecedented on the molecular scale, and might even change gas processing. For professor James Tour, the fundamental science behind this porous carbon material created in his laboratory “is really profound.” The black powdery material developed by a Rice graduate student, Chih-Chau Hwang, absorbs nearly its weight of carbon dioxide by creating long polymer chains of carbon dioxide at a pressure level that is elevated, but easily attained, in a gas processing facility. For Tour, it is an exciting development because the carbon dioxide polymer structure, which was observed using spectroscopy, is something that he said has never been seen in nature, and only rarely in labs at extreme pressures. But the pioneering chemist recognizes that for those developing new oilfield technologies, what matters is what it can do, not how it might do so. Rice’s patents have been licensed by Apache Corp., which supported research seeking a new material for gas separation for the past 2½ years. On the plus side, it appears to be energy-efficient, can hold a large volume relative to its weight, and is highly selective at grabbing carbon dioxide without also removing some natural gas as well. The investment by the independent oil company reflects the exploration and production industry’s appetite for improved methods that are more compact, cost less to run, and occupy less space. One indication of that is the increased demand for improved membrane-based separation methods, which are far more compact and adaptable to offshore environments than liquid chemical separation methods using amines. Cameron recently began selling a new, more efficient membrane material, called PN-1 multifiber membrane element, which was developed in partnership with Petronas, the Malaysian national oil company. Better carbon dioxide removal is a pressing concern in southeast Asia, where many large gas deposits have not been developed because of carbon dioxide levels that can equal the gas in the ground. Production growth there, and in far-flung regions from Russia to Brazil, will require dealing with higher levels of carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide, which often are found together and removed using similar processes.
Read full abstract