PARP Inhibitors Research Articles

Abstract PO4-23-08: Estrogen therapy induces receptor-dependent DNA damage enhanced by PARP inhibition in ER+ breast cancer

Abstract Although clinical evidence indicates that treatment with estrogens elicits anti-cancer effects in ~30% of patients with advanced endocrine-resistant ER+ breast cancer, the underlying mechanism of action is unclear and this treatment remains under-utilized. ER+ breast cancer cells with acquired resistance to long-term estrogen deprivation (LTED) were used to model resistance to aromatase inhibitors (AIs) seen clinically. Genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screening and transcriptomic profiling of LTED cells highlighted DNA Damage Response as a required pathway for therapeutic response to the estrogen 17b-estradiol. Tumor specimens from 2 patients with advanced ER+ breast cancer showed increased DNA damage response upon treatment with 17b-estradiol therapy compared to baseline. LTED cells treated with 17b-estradiol exhibited replication-dependent markers of DNA damage and the DNA damage response prior to apoptosis, while parental cells did not. Such DNA damage was partially driven by the formation of DNA:RNA hybrids (R-loops), and RNase H1-mediated prevention of R-loop formation abrogated 17b-estradiol-induced DNA damage. Pharmacological suppression of the DNA damage response via poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition with olaparib enhanced 17b-estradiol-induced DNA damage. PARP inhibition synergized with 17b-estradiol to suppress growth and prevent tumor recurrence in both BRCA1/2-mutant and BRCA1/2-wild-type cell line and patient-derived xenograft models. We therefore conclude that 17b-estradiol-induced ER activity drives DNA damage and growth inhibition in endocrine-resistant breast cancer cells, and inhibition of the DNA damage response using drugs such as PARP inhibitors can exacerbate transcriptional stress and enhance therapeutic response to 17b-estradiol. This concept is being explored clinically in the PHOEBE trial testing the combination of 17b-estradiol and olaparib (NCT05900895). These findings also warrant further study of other DNA damage response inhibitors in advanced ER+ breast cancer. Moreover, these data indicate that PARP inhibitors may have applications beyond homologous recombination-deficient tumors. Citation Format: Nicole Traphagen, Gary Schwartz, Steven Tau, Alyssa Roberts, Amanda Jiang, Sarah Hosford, Jonathan Marotti, Abigail Goen, Bianca Romo, Anneka Johnson, Emily Duffy, Eugene Demidenko, Paul Heverly, Yaron Mosesson, Shannon Soucy, Fred Kolling, Todd Miller. Estrogen therapy induces receptor-dependent DNA damage enhanced by PARP inhibition in ER+ breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-23-08.

Abstract PO5-20-03: Phase I/II study of stereotactic radiosurgery with concurrent olaparib followed by adjuvant durvalumab and physician’s choice systemic therapy in subjects with breast cancer brain metastases

Abstract BACKGROUND: Despite progress in the treatment of brain metastasis for HER2+ breast cancer, outcomes for patients with HER2-negative breast cancer brain metastases remain poor. Current standard of care consists of local therapies, including surgery and radiotherapy, followed by systemic therapy. Preclinical studies show inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) are effective in combination with radiation therapy as a DNA damage response inhibitor. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has higher rates of homologous recombination deficiency compared to other breast cancer subtypes, and together with HER2-negative, BRCA-mutated breast cancer would be particularly sensitive to PARP inhibition. PARP inhibition has also demonstrated promising efficacy combined with immunotherapy in patients with germline BRCA-mutant and metastatic TNBC in clinical trials (MEDIOLA, TOPACIO). In addition, immunotherapy with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is associated with favorable intracranial control and survival in patients with brain metastases. We hypothesize that this biologically-driven combination will enhance local control of SRS-treated brain metastases through synergy with PARP inhibition, while controlling micrometastatic disease in the brain and extracranial sites via potentiation of the immune response. METHODS: We are conducting a multi-institution, Phase I/II trial of SRS plus olaparib, followed by durvalumab (with physician’s choice systemic therapy), for patients with TNBC (any BRCA status) or HER2-negative with BRCA-mutated (germline or somatic) breast cancer brain metastases [NCT04711824]. A total of 41 patients are planned for enrollment at 8 sites. The primary objectives are to evaluate safety and tolerability (Phase I) and determine intracranial disease control at 6 months (Phase II) of this treatment combination. Secondary objectives include determining clinical activity via intracranial and global progression-free survival, overall survival, and intracranial and extracranial response rate. Exploratory objectives will assess potential biomarkers of treatment response, including changes in circulating tumor cells and DNA in blood and cerebrospinal fluid, germline and tumor mutations in DNA repair pathway genes, and PD-L1 expression, as well as quality of life and patient-reported outcomes. A surgical sub-study (n=5) will evaluate olaparib concentration/distribution in resected brain metastases. As of June 2023, cohort 2 of phase I has been completed without dose-limiting toxicity. Citation Format: Colette Shen, Yara Abdou, Linda Chen, Xianming Tan, Gaorav Gupta, Mina Lobbous, Filipa Lynce, Erica Stringer-Reasor, Carey Anders. Phase I/II study of stereotactic radiosurgery with concurrent olaparib followed by adjuvant durvalumab and physician’s choice systemic therapy in subjects with breast cancer brain metastases [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-20-03.

Abstract PO2-09-03: Twenty-one gene recurrence scores in individuals with breast cancer associated with PALB2 germline pathogenic variants

Abstract Background: The 21-gene recurrence score assay (Oncotype DX, Genomic Health Inc., CA) is prognostic, quantifies predicted benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy, and informs clinical decisions for patients with early-stage, hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC). Differences in Oncotype recurrence scores (RS) in individuals with and without BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) pathogenic variants (PV) have been demonstrated, but the results of this assay in patients with BC and germline PALB2 PV have not previously been described. This is of particular relevance as PALB2 BC has demonstrated biologic features similar to BRCA1/2 BC such as poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) sensitivity. Methods: Patients with early-stage, HR+, HER2-, invasive breast cancer and a germline PALB2 PV were ascertained from academic cancer center databases and the Prospective Registry of MultiPlex Testing (PROMPT), an online research registry for individuals who have had multigene panel testing for inherited cancer susceptibility. Study participants (pts) were categorized by age < 50 and ≥50. Oncotype DX RS were retrospectively reviewed and categorized as those that would and would not warrant consideration of chemotherapy (≥16 and < 16, respectively, for pts < 50; ≥26 and < 26, respectively, for pts ≥50). Yates corrected Chi-square tests were used to compare RS distributions between carriers and a previously published genetically unselected reference population. Results: Oncotype DX reports were reviewed for 20 pts with BC and germline PALB2 PV. Median RS was 19 (range 6-41) overall. Four patients were diagnosed under the age of 50 (range 33-48); median RS for these individuals was 19 (range 12-41). Sixteen patients were diagnosed at age 50 or greater (median 59, range 50-70); median RS for these individuals was also 19 (range 6-31). Compared to the genetically unselected reference population, Oncotype DX RS in pts with PALB2-associated BC demonstrated a numerical but not statistically significant shift in distribution towards categories in which chemotherapy would be considered. Among pts under the age of 50, 75% had Oncotype DX RS for which chemotherapy would be considered and 25% had Oncotype DX RS for which endocrine therapy alone would likely be recommended (p=0.726 compared to reference). Among pts aged 50 and older, 25% had Oncotype DX RS for which chemotherapy would be considered and 75% had Oncotype DX RS for which endocrine therapy alone would likely be recommended (p=0.579 compared to reference). Conclusions: Compared to data from the published genetically unselected commercial database, BC associated with PALB2 PV may have higher Oncotype DX RS reflective of intrinsically less favorable biology and greater therapeutic sensitivity. Larger datasets are forthcoming to confirm presence of significant differences in Oncotype DX RS distributions between BC with and without PALB2 PV. Table 1. Oncotype DX RS distribution by age among pts with gPALB2 PV and genetically unselected reference *Jakubowski et al., J Surg Oncol 2020. PMID 3249731 Citation Format: Payal Shah, Siddhartha Yadav, Jamie Brower, Jada Hamilton, Erica Simmons, Judy Garber, Kenneth Offit, Mark Robson, Fergus Couch, Susan Domchek. Twenty-one gene recurrence scores in individuals with breast cancer associated with PALB2 germline pathogenic variants [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-09-03.

Abstract PS07-07: The RXR agonist, IRX4204, delays the formation of Brca1 mutant mammary tumors via modulation of the anti-tumor immune response

Abstract Background: Women with germline BRCA1 mutations are at an increased risk for developing breast cancer in their lifetime, often at a young age with more aggressive tumors. At present, prophylactic bilateral mastectomy is the most effective strategy for reducing breast cancer risk. However, this invasive procedure is irreversible and associated with potential complications. We and others have found that PARP inhibitors can delay Brca1-mutant tumor formation in mice and could be beneficial for the prevention of breast cancer. However, currently available PARP inhibitors are associated with modest toxicities that may not be acceptable to women without cancer. Thus, there remains an urgent need for the development of safe and effective therapies for the prevention of breast cancer. Here, we present data demonstrating the activity of IRX4204, a minimally toxic and highly specific agonist of the nuclear retinoid X receptor (RXR), to delay the formation of mammary tumors in a Brca1-deficient mouse model. This inhibitory effect on tumor growth is due, in part, to the role of IRX4204 in stimulating the anti-tumor immune response. Methods: We used the established MMTV-Cre, conditional Brca1 gene knockout, p53 heterozygous loss mouse model (BRCA1co/co; MMTV-Cre+/+; p53+/-) and selected for mutant female pups using PCR genotyping. At 16 weeks of age, all mice were separated into 4 treatment groups (n=10 per group): (1) sesame oil control; (2) the novel RXR agonist, IRX-4204 (10mg/kg); (3) high-dose IRX4204 (20 mg/kg); and (4) the RXR agonist, 9-cis-UAB-30 (5 mg/kg). All treatments were given by oral gavage five days per week, and mice were observed daily for tumor formation and toxicity. At the study endpoint, tumors and normal mammary glands were collected for additional analyses. Immunohistochemical staining was used to quantify CD8a, Ki-67 and cleaved caspase 3 expression in Brca1-deficient tumors. Oil Red O staining was used to measure changes in lipid accumulation in Brca1-deficient cell lines treated with IRX4204. qPCR was used to quantify the changes in gene expression of lipid metabolism-associated genes upon treatment with IRX4204 in vitro. Results: Vehicle-treated Brca1-deficient mice had a median time-to-tumor formation (TTF) of 211 days, with 100% developing tumors by 330 days. Mice treated with UAB 5 mg/kg had an improved median TTF of 261 days, whereas mice treated with IRX4204 10mg/kg or 20mg/kg had a median TTF of 347 and 304 days, respectively (p < 0.01). In addition, 60% of mice treated with IRX4204 10 mg/kg remained tumor-free at 330 days. IRX4204-treated tumors showed an increased infiltration of CD8-positive T-cells over vehicle-treated tumors (p < 0.05). Treatment of Brca1-deficient cell lines with IRX4204 in vitro resulted in a significant increase in lipid accumulation accompanied by a 2-fold increase of Srebf1 expression (a key transcription factor that regulates lipid homeostasis) within 24 hours of treatment (p < 0.05). Conclusion: These data demonstrate a novel use of the RXR agonist, IRX4204, to delay the formation of Brca1-deficient mammary tumors. We have found that IRX4204 treatment modulates the tumor immune response through increased infiltration of cytotoxic CD8-positive T-cells in Brca1-deficient mammary tumors in vivo. We have also determined that IRX4204 modulates lipid metabolism in breast cancer cell lines in vitro. It is known that lipid-derived antigens can stimulate T-cell activity. Our findings suggest that RXR agonists may alter lipid antigen production to activate an anti-tumor response. Additional immune and lipidomic studies are on-going. This work was supported by NCI-PREVENT grant (to PB and AM HHSN26100008) and CFP Foundation (Odyssey Fellowship to CM). Citation Format: Cassandra Moyer, Darian Coleman, Jamal Hill, Lana A. Vornik, Michelle Savage, Martin Sanders, Sei Shizuko, Altaf Mohammed, Powel Brown, Abhijit Mazumdar. The RXR agonist, IRX4204, delays the formation of Brca1 mutant mammary tumors via modulation of the anti-tumor immune response [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PS07-07.

Abstract PS06-04: The prognostic and predictive impact of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) dynamics in patients with metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) on olaparib based therapy: Results from Cohort E of the PlasmaMATCH trial

Abstract Background: Early changes in ctDNA levels, ctDNA dynamics, may help identify which patients are responding to therapy earlier than imaging. Few studies have assessed ctDNA dynamics during PARP inhibitor therapy. Here we report paired baseline and early on treatment ctDNA analysis from cohort E of plasmaMATCH, that recruited patients with TNBC to treatment with olaparib (PARP inhibitor) plus ceralasertib (ATR inhibitor). Methods: The plasmaMATCH trial assessed the ability of ctDNA testing to allocate patients to mutation matched treatment cohorts (A-D). Patients with TNBC, and without mutations matching cohorts B-D, were enrolled on cohort E. Samples were collected for ctDNA analysis pre-treatment at cycle 1-day1 (C1D1) and cycle 2-day 1 (C2D1). A minimum of 14 days of treatment in the first cycle was required for inclusion in this analysis. Samples were sequenced using error-corrected gene targeted panels (Guardant360, or GuardantOMNI, Guardant Health). Circulating DNA ratio (CDR) was calculated as the ratio of C2D1 ctDNA level to C1D1, pre-specified using the weighted mean of variant allele fractions (AF) of clonal mutations at C1D1, excluding variants with AF < 0.3%, and variants in genes frequently mutated in clonal haematopoesis (GNAS, JAK2, IDH1, IDH2 and ATM). The optimal cut-point for predicting progression free survival (PFS) was assessed as the cut-point with the highest Harrell’s C-index. Results: Of the 75 patients that were enrolled into cohort E, 53 patients had samples sent for paired C1D1-C2D1 ctDNA sequencing, 2 failed sequencing, and all 51 (68%) patients had detectable ctDNA at C1D1. The ctDNA analysis set was representative of the overall enrolled population. The optimal ctDNA dynamics C-index cut-point for predicting PFS was 0 (undetectable ctDNA at C2D1). Median PFS with ctDNA CDR >0 (detectable ctDNA at C2D1) was 4.3 months (95% CI 2.4-5.8), and with undetectable ctDNA was 12 months (95% CI 8-NA) (HR 4.02, 95% CI 1.22-13.23, p=0.01). Splitting patients by median CDR was not predictive (HR=0.98; 95%CI: 0.52-1.82, p=0.94). Confirmed objective response rate was 85.7% (42.1-99.6) in patients with undetectable ctDNA at C2D1, and with detectable ctDNA was 11.4% (3.8-24.6) (OR 4.02, 95% CI 1.22-13.23, p=0.01). Of the 7 patients with undetectable ctDNA at C2D1, one had a BRCA2 germline mutation, and all other patients were wildtype for BRCA1/2 mutations in tumour and germline. All patients with undetectable ctDNA and BRCA1/2 wildtype had a confirmed response.In cohorts A-D (mutation targeted therapies, in predominantly ER positive cancer), the optimal ctDNA dynamics C-index CDR cut-point was 0.165 (HR 3.44, 95%CI: 2.06-5.75, p< 0.001), with median CDR cut-point also highly predictive (HR=2.14, 95%CI:1.36-3.36, p=0.001). Undetectable ctDNA was also strongly predictive (HR=4.41; 95%CI: 1.97-9.87, p< 0.001) in cohort A-D.In cohort E, a significant association was found between baseline ctDNA and PFS, with an optimal C-index cutpoint of 6.81% (HR=3.02, 95% CI: 1.39-6.56, p=0.001). Median PFS for baseline ctDNA ≤ 6.81% was 10.2 months (95% CI 3.7-17.2), and for baseline ctDNA >6.81% was 4.4 months (95% CI 2.2-5.5). Conclusions: ‘Clearance’ of ctDNA to become undetectable at C2D1 identified sporadic TNBC patients who benefited from olaparib and ceralasertib. Although ‘clearance’ of ctDNA was associated with good outcome on olaparib plus ceralasertib, median CDR was not predictive of treatment benefit. This contrasts the results of ctDNA dynamic assessment of cohort A-D, where median CDR was highly predictive of treatment benefit. ctDNA dynamic assessment may differ between mutation targeted therapies (cohorts A-D) that induce cell-cycle arrest, and PARP inhibitors (cohort E) that inhibit DNA repair mechanisms. Implementing ctDNA dynamics into clinical trials and care may require distinct analysis for different therapies. Citation Format: Iseult Browne, Javier Pascual, Rosalind Cutts, Belinda Kingston, Sarah Hrebien, Lucy Kilburn, Alex Pearson, Laura Moretti, Andrew Wardley, Iain Macpherson, Richard Baird, Rebecca Roylance, Iris Faull, Kimberly C Banks, Isaac Garcia-Murillas, Judith Bliss, Alistair Ring, Nicholas Turner. The prognostic and predictive impact of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) dynamics in patients with metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) on olaparib based therapy: Results from Cohort E of the PlasmaMATCH trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PS06-04.

Abstract PO3-09-04: Identification of germline pathogenic variants to guide systemic therapy: Prevalence and spectrum of PVs among Mexican patients with metastatic breast cancer

Abstract BACKGROUND Currently, international genetic cancer risk assessment (GCRA) guidelines recommend genetic testing for the identification of germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) to guide systemic therapy. Patients with PVs in BRCA genes are candidates to receive poly(adenosine diphosphate–ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). The prevalence of PVs in patients with HER2-negative MBC has been reported to be 10%. The proportion of MBC in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) is higher. However, access to genetic testing in LMIC is limited and contributes to the gap in genetic epidemiology knowledge. We aimed to describe the frequency of germline PVs in breast cancer associated genes and clinic-pathologic characteristics of Mexican women with MBC. METHODS This retrospective study included Mexican women from 7 centers in Mexico, who were diagnosed with MBC and had genetic testing. Pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants were reported. Demographic, histopathological characteristics, family history and access to treatment with PARPi, were obtained from chart review. RESULTS From August 2017 to May 2023, 114 Mexican women with MBC were included, median age at diagnosis was 47 years (range 24-80 y), 42% had de novo metastatic, and 58% recurrent disease. 86.8% had infiltrating ductal carcinoma, 51.3% had HR+HER2- (n=58), 4.4% HR+HER+ (n=5), 5.3% HR-HER2+ (n=6), and 38.6% triple negative tumors (n=44). Sites of metastatic disease were as follows: 61.4% non-regional nodes (n=70), 57% bone (n=65), 40.3% lung (n=46), 30.7% liver (n=35), 15.8% central nervous system (n=18) and 7% peritoneal carcinomatosis (n=8). The frequency of PVs was 22% (25/114); 84% of the PVs were heterozygous, mainly identified in BRCA genes (BRCA1 n=12, BRCA2 n=9), and in 4 patients in other genes (PALB2 n=2, PTEN n=1, MUTYH n=1). Among PARPi candidates, 40% (10/25) received Olaparib, the majority received it on the second or subsequent lines of treatment (7/10) with a median progression free survival of 6 months (3-13 m). BRCA carriers were younger at BC diagnosis (38.5 vs. 49 years, p=0.00694) and had a significant higher proportion of family history of ovarian cancer (p=0.00039), but not for breast (p=0.06), prostate (p=0.71) or pancreatic cancer (p=0.098), compared to non-carriers. CONCLUSION We found a high frequency of PVs in BRCA genes in Mexican women with MBC. Access to the genetic testing and targeted therapy should be improve in the Mexican population in order to decrease disparities in cancer care in the Mexican Population. In addition, genetic testing allows to identify other family members at risk with cascade testing and to recommend them risk reduction strategies. Citation Format: Jose Luis Rodriguez-Olivares, Maria Fernanda Esparza-Orozco, Jose Alfredo Ramirez-Gonzalez, Roberto Ivan Sanchez-Reyes, Enrique Isay Talamantes-Gamez, Gregorio Quintero-Beulo, Gilberto Lopez-Rosas, Karla Alicia Centelles-López, Brizio Moreno-Jaime, Daniela Vazquez-Juarez, Ana Maria Hernandez-Murillo, Ilana de la Puente Tawil, Jeffrey Weitzel, Cynthia Villareal Garza, Yanin Chavarri-Guerra. Identification of germline pathogenic variants to guide systemic therapy: Prevalence and spectrum of PVs among Mexican patients with metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-09-04.

Abstract PO2-17-06: Real world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes by germline BRCA (gBRCA) mutation status in patients with HER2-negative early breast cancer in the US community oncology setting: a retrospective observational chart-review study

Abstract Background: Women with early-stage breast cancer (eBC) who have inherited BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations (gBRCAm) are typically diagnosed at a younger age and often require more intensive treatment. In the randomized, double-blind OlympiA trial of HER2-negative (HER2–) gBRCAm patients, olaparib, a targeted poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi), significantly improved invasive disease free survival (IDFS), distant disease free survival (DDFS) and overall survival (OS) and was subsequently approved for adjuvant treatment of gBRCAm HER2– high-risk eBC patients. This study examined the real-world patient characteristics, treatment patterns and clinical outcomes by gBRCA status among patients with HER2– eBC in a US community oncology setting prior to olaparib US approval for treatment of eBC. Methods: This retrospective observational study used chart review data from The US Oncology Network's iKnowMed database to examine adult patients diagnosed with HER2– eBC (stage I-III) initiating systemic neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy with chemotherapy and/or endocrine therapy between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2018. Patients with valid gBRCAm test results (all gBRCAm and randomly selected BRCAwt patients) were included and followed through December 31, 2021. Patients were excluded if they had HER2+ tumors and progressed to stage IV within 6 months after initiation of neoadjuvant therapy or were diagnosed with another primary cancer. Descriptive analyses assessed patient characteristics. Kaplan Meier methods and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models (CPHM) were used to evaluate IDFS, DDFS and OS by gBRCA status and by HR+/HER2– or TNBC eBC subsets. Results: Among 298 BC patients meeting initial criteria, 42% had gBRCAm (n=124, 43% hormone receptor positive [HR+], 56% triple-negative BC [TNBC], 1% unknown), and 58% had gBRCAwt (n=174, 74% HR+, 22% TNBC). Median (interquartile) age at surgery was numerically lower in gBRCAm (45 [36,55] years) than gBRCAwt (48 [41,55] years) patients. A numerically higher proportion of gBRCAm patients received neoadjuvant therapy compared with gBRCAwt (Neoadj: gBRCAm 37.1% vs gBRCAwt 12.6%) but the reverse was true for adjuvant (Adj: gBRCAm 42.7% vs gBRCAwt 65.5%) and neoadjuvant + adjuvant use was numerically similar (Neoadj+Adj: gBRCAm 20.1% vs gBRCAwt 21.8%). The majority of TNBC patients received neoadjuvant therapy while the majority of HR+ patients received adjuvant therapy (Neoadj: TNBC 51.4% vs HR+ 6.6%, Adj: TNBC 29.0% vs HR+ 71.4%, Neoadj+Adj: TNBC 19.6% vs HR+ 22.0%). Median IDFS, DDFS, and OS in both study cohorts were not reached. Median follow-up from surgery was < 5 years (overall 59.0 months; gBRCAm 50.6 months; gBRCAwt 61.3 months). At 60 months, in gBRCAm and gBRCAwt respectively, estimated IDFS were 85.5% and 90.9%, estimated DDFS 88.1% and 92.2%, and estimated survival 91.9% and 95.2%. At 60 months, in HR+/HER2– and TNBC respectively, estimated IDFS were 92.4% and 81.2%, estimated DDFS 93.9% and 85.7%, and estimated survival 96.3% and 90.9%. CPHM results showed that risks of invasive disease (HR 1.74; 95% CI 0.83-3.64; p=0.15), distant disease (HR 1.24; 95% CI 0.50-3.07; p=0.65) and death (HR 1.79; 95% CI 0.52-6.13; p=0.353) were similar between gBRCAm and gBRCAwt patients. Between HR+/HER2– and TNBC patients, risks of invasive disease (HR=0.63; 95% CI 0.21-1.89; p=0.41), distant disease (HR=0.42; 95% CI 0.11-1.67; p=0.22) and death (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.09-2.70; p=0.41) were similar. Conclusions: This real-world chart review study of data through 2021 (before PARPi approval for eBC) with limited follow up of 5 years found that gBRCAm patients had a numerically shorter survival (IDFS, DDFS and OS) than gBRCAwt, but this difference was not statistically significantly different. Given that the follow-up period was too short to draw conclusions, further studies examining clinical outcomes over a longer follow-up period after approval of PARPi may be of interest. Citation Format: Jay Andersen, Jagadeswara Earla, Nicole Fulcher, Juliet Ndukum, Nicholas J Robert, Mark Robson, Weiyan Li, Jaime Mejia. Real world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes by germline BRCA (gBRCA) mutation status in patients with HER2-negative early breast cancer in the US community oncology setting: a retrospective observational chart-review study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-17-06.

Abstract PO1-06-09: Phase 2 Trial with Safety Run-In of Gedatolisib Plus Talazoparib in Advanced Triple Negative or BRCA1/2 Positive, HER2 Negative Breast CancersBig Ten Cancer Research Consortium BTCRC-BRE18-337

Abstract Up to 2/3 of triple negative breast cancers (TNBC) have acquired defects in homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair, yet poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) monotherapy has been largely ineffective in the absence of a germline BRCA 1/2 mutation (gBRCA1/2). Phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K)/mTOR pathway alterations are also common in breast cancers. Preclinical data suggest that PI3K/mTOR inhibition may disrupt normal function of the HR complex and increase dependency on PARP enzymes for HR DNA repair. Thus, combining a PI3K/mTOR inhibitor with a PARPi may result in a synergistic anti-neoplastic effect. The run-in portion of this study evaluated the safety of weekly IV gedatolisib (PI3K/mTORi) and continuous daily talazoparib to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). A 3+3 design for dose escalation explored two dose levels. The phase II study began once the MTD and R2PD were confirmed. Eligibility required age ≥ 18, 1-2 prior lines of therapy (protocol later amended to allow up to 3 lines), and advanced TNBC or advanced HER2-negative BC with gBRCA1/2 mutation. The sample size for the phase II study was determined based on a 1-sided binomial test under the null and alternative ORR of 5% vs 20% with a type I error rate of 0.1 and power level of 80%. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) in TNBC without known gBRCA1/2 with secondary endpoints of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients with a gBRCA1/2 mutation were not included in the primary endpoint analysis. Correlative studies are planned to evaluate HR deficiency mutations, PIK3CA mutations, and other exploratory genomics. A total of 33 patients were enrolled: 14 in the safety run-in phase of the trial and 19 in the phase II study (17 TNBC, 2 with gBRCA2 mutation). In the safety run-in, 6 patients were enrolled at dose level 1 (0.75 mg talazoparib po daily and 180 mg gedatolisib IV weekly) and 8 at dose level 2 (1 mg talazoparib po daily and 180 mg gedatolisib IV weekly). 42% of the cohort developed hyperglycemia, which was mostly grade 1. There was 1 DLT of grade 3 neutropenia at dose level 1. There were 3 patients who experienced grade 4 AEs, thrombocytopenia (2) and lymphopenia (1) which were outside of the DLT window. The MTD was 1 mg of talazoparib daily and 180 mg of gedatolisib weekly, and this was selected as the RP2D. A protocol amendment was made during the phase II portion to allow for a 3 week on/1 week off schedule for gedatolisib due to emerging data showing a more favorable safety profile and enhanced antitumor activity with this dosing schedule. In the 17 patients with TNBC and no gBRCA mutation in the phase II cohort, the ORR was 12%. Best response was partial response (PR) in 2 patients (12%), stable disease (SD) in 7 patients (41%), and progressive disease (PD) in 8 patients (47%). The clinical benefit rate (ORR+SD) at 16 weeks was 23.5%. The most common adverse events (AEs) in all 33 patients were anemia (70%), fatigue (67%), oral mucositis (64%), nausea (60%), neutropenia (45%) and anorexia (45%). Of these, most were grade 1-2 other than anemia (35% grade 3), neutropenia (20% grade 3), fatigue (18% grade 3), and oral mucositis (10% grade 3). There were no grade 4 AEs in the phase II study. Median PFS was approximately 3 months and median OS was approximately 6.4 months. Although this study did not meet its primary endpoint, there were 2 TNBC patients without a gBRCA1/2 mutation who achieved a partial response to this non-chemotherapy regimen. Future biomarker testing may help elucidate these findings and possible predictors of response. Citation Format: Sneha Phadke, Kari Wisinski, Oana Danciu, Ami Shah, Menggang Yu, Yi Chen, Kathy Miller, Mark Burkard. Phase 2 Trial with Safety Run-In of Gedatolisib Plus Talazoparib in Advanced Triple Negative or BRCA1/2 Positive, HER2 Negative Breast CancersBig Ten Cancer Research Consortium BTCRC-BRE18-337 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-06-09.

Abstract PO2-08-09: Prevalence of germline genetic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes among patients with metaplastic breast cancer

Abstract Background: Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (PV) in breast cancer (BC) susceptibility genes are present in approximately 5-10% of individuals with breast cancer and approximately 13-15% of those with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Identifying patients with PV in BRCA1 and BRCA2 can inform selection of appropriate candidates for poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi), which have improved progression-free and overall survival in the metastatic and adjuvant settings, respectively. Metaplastic breast cancer (MpBC) is a rare, aggressive subtype of breast cancer that is often triple-negative and refractory to chemotherapy. To date, limited data describe germline genetic findings in patients with MpBC. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review including patients with pathology results at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania from 2021 through May 2023 demonstrating MpBC. Germline genetic test results and tumor histopathologic characteristics including estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status were evaluated. Descriptive statistics as well as two-tailed t tests were used for data analysis. Results: Of 89 patients identified with MpBC, 51 had germline genetic testing results available for review. Nine patients (17.6%) had MpBC with PV in BC predisposition genes (PV-MpBC) and 42 (82.4%) had PV-negative MpBC (PVneg-MpBC). Seven patients (13.7%) had a PV in BRCA1, 1 (2.0%) in BRCA2, and 1 (2.0%) in CHEK2. Median age at diagnosis was 45 years for patients with PV-MpBC and 56.5 years for those with PVneg-MpBC (p=0.005). Among patients with PV-MpBC, 6 (66.7%) had ER and PR negative disease by ASCO-CAP guidelines and 3 (33.3%) had ER and/or PR positive disease. Among patients with PVneg-MpBC, 31 (73.8%) had ER and PR negative disease and 11 (26.2%) had ER and/or PR positive disease. All 9 patients with PV-MpBC had HER2-negative disease, one (11.1%) of whom had HER2-low disease. Among patients with PVneg-MpBC, 40 (95.2%) had HER2-negative disease, two (4.8%) of whom had HER2-low disease, and 2 (4.8%) had HER2-positive BC. Conclusions: The frequency of PV in breast cancer susceptibility genes among patients with MpBC is comparable to, and possibly higher than, the reported rates of such PV in patients with TNBC, for whom genetic testing is recommended. If confirmed in a larger dataset, germline testing should be considered for all patients with MpBC regardless of ER, PR, and HER2 status, as findings may help identify candidates for PARPi therapy and genetically-directed clinical trials. Citation Format: Kaitlin Demarest, Anupma Nayak, Payal Shah. Prevalence of germline genetic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes among patients with metaplastic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-08-09.

Abstract PS12-07: Phase II clinical trial of palbociclib and binimetinib in advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with hyperactivation of ERK and/or CDK4/6

Abstract Background: We previously demonstrated that a kinase-based taxonomy of TNBC was most parsimonious than next-generation sequencing in defining TNBC subtypes associated with prognostic categories in early disease. The most aggressive TNBC variants were driven by a heterogeneous set of genetic aberrations that converged in the increased activity of 6 kinases: KIT, PNKP, PRKCE, P70S6K, ERK and CDK6 (Nat Commun; 9:3501-18). The combined inhibition of these kinases in pairs led to potent tumor regression in preclinical models, being the most powerful combination that one directed against CDK6 and ERK. This prompted us to design a phase II trial testing the combination of palbociclib (against CDK6) and binimetinib (against the ERK upstream kinase MEK, since no ERK inhibitor was available at that moment outside phase I trials) in advanced TNBC. Hyperactivation of CDK6 and/or ERK was selected as entry criterion. Trial design: This was a single-arm, prospective, multicentric, open-label, phase II investigator-initiated trial. CDK6 and phosphor-ERK levels were measured in tumor samples by immunohistochemistry and normalized with a reference sample collection to a Z-score. Patients with scores for either kinase above the median were candidates for the trial. Key inclusion criteria included metastatic >18year-old TNBC, adequate organ function, measurable disease, and progression to 1-2 prior treatment lines (including immunotherapy, and a PARP inhibitor in case of germline BRCA1/2 mutation). Patients started continuous oral binimetinib at 45 mg/BID and palbociclib 100 mg/day from days 1 to 21, in 28-day cycles. Patients experiencing ≤ grade 1 tolerable side effects as the greatest toxicity were escalated to palbociclib to 125 in cycle 2. RECIST 1.1 and NCI CTC AE V 5.0 were used for assessing disease control (q8 weeks) and toxicity. The primary aims were to assess the efficacy and toxicity of this combination, and the secondary one to detect biomarkers of activity. At the time of trial design, in absence of available Sacituzumab for prescription, the reference PFS to beat in advanced lines for physician’s choice in TNBC was 1.7 month (NEJM; 384:1529-41, 2021). With alpha and beta errors of 0.05 and 0.2, the minimum number of patients to demonstrate a 30% improvement in PFS to 2.5 months was 25. Results: From November 2020 to April 2023, 69 patients were screened and 24 entered the trial (5 positive for phosphor-ERK; 2 for CDK6; 17 for both). Toxicity was generally mild and included grade 1-2 diarrhea (33% of the patients), grade 1-2 asthenia (50%), grade 1-3 neutropenia (75%), grade 2 retinal toxicity (8.3%) and grade 3 rash (4.2%); no grade 4/5 toxicities were observed. Median PFS was 1.83 months (range 0.3 to 11.3+). Phospho-ERK and CDK6 levels were not correlated (Pearson’s R= -0.089; P=0.68); CDK6 levels did not show association with PFS time (R = -0.120; P=0.58). Interestingly, however, phosphor-ERK levels in the baseline tumor sample showed correlation with PFS time (R = 0.428; P=0.037). Conclusion: The combination of palbociclib and binimetinib was generally safe, and PFS time showed correlation with baseline phosphorylation levels of ERK. However, the trial did not meet its primary endpoint. Citation Format: Rodrigo Sánchez-Bayona, Alfonso Cortes, Juan Miguel Cejalvo, Luis Manso, Serafin Morales, Jose A Garcia-Saenz, Jorge Silva, Juan A Guerra, Diego Malón-Giménez, Silvana Mouron, Eduardo Caleiras, Miguel Quintela-Fandino. Phase II clinical trial of palbociclib and binimetinib in advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with hyperactivation of ERK and/or CDK4/6 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PS12-07.

Abstract PO2-19-11: NOBLE – Neoadjuvant Olaparib and Durvalumab for patients with BRCA-associated TripLE Negative Breast Cancer

Abstract Background The standard of care for patients with early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. Recently, immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICI) added to neoadjuvant chemotherapy have shown efficacy. Among TNBC, BRCA mutations and other homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) signals are relatively frequent. As opposed to other types of breast cancer, TNBC show a high neoantigen load, a large number of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and a high PD-L1 expression. In BRCA/HRD breast cancer, PARP inhibitors (PARPi) exhibit a distinct anticancer activity. In addition, they show immunomodulatory effects by promoting PD-L1 expression and DNA damage, increasing neoantigen load. Chemotherapy-free regimens combining PARPi and ICI result in promising synergistic activity as shown in the metastatic setting, supporting investigation in the neoadjuvant setting. Trial design NOBLE is an EORTC phase 2, randomized, international, multicentre, open label, clinical trial. Eligible patients will undergo central screening for tumoral BRCA/HRD (Institute Curie, 455 patients), 152 patients will be randomized 1:1 between olaparib vs olaparib and durvalumab for 4 cycles (16 weeks) of neoadjuvant treatment. Thereafter, patients will undergo surgery. All patients will be followed-up to 2 years (y) after surgery. The trial will be conducted in 3 steps (screening/randomization): Step 1 – Feasibility (60/20): to assess the central testing failure rate, the turn-around time for central testing and the prevalence of tBRCA/HRD; Step 2 (193/64) – Futility; and Step 3 (202/152) – Expansion of recruitment. The primary endpoint is the rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) at the time of surgery, defined as ypT0/is ypN0. Secondary endpoints are response based on RECIST v1.1, surgery rate, 2-y event-free-survival, 2-y overall survival, safety, and quality of life. The study is expected to be activated in early autumn 2023 and the primary endpoint will be available approximately 5 years after the screening of the first patient. Main inclusion criteria Histologically confirmed primary TNBC, defined as: - ER and PgR ≤ 10% - HER2-negative per ASCO CAP guidelines Stage T1c-T2 N0-N1 M0 BRCA mutation and/or HRD based on methylation as determined by central testing ECOG status 0-1 Written informed consent Age ≥18 years No prior systemic therapy nor surgery for the current Main exclusion criteria Previous treatment with a PARPi or an immune-checkpoint inhibitor History of previous invasive breast cancer Bilateral and/or multifocal and/or multicentric BC Autoimmune or inflammatory disease Specific aims The aim of this study is to provide a safe and effective neoadjuvant treatment free of chemotherapy to a distinct subpopulation among patients with TNBC. We will evaluate the pCR after neoadjuvant treatment with olaparib alone and with olaparib in combination with durvalumab in patients with TNBC showing a BRCA1/2 mutation or HRD based on methylation. Statistical methods The sample size was calculated based on the minimax Simon two-stage design including an interim analysis for futility of the primary endpoint. Decision rules are pre-specified in the study protocol. Each treatment arm will be analyzed independently. There will be no formal comparison between the two experimental treatment arms. A minimization technique will be used for random treatment allocation stratifying for the type of HRD alteration, PD-L1 expression level and for TILs. Accrual We expect to start recruiting in September 2023. We aim to screen 455 patients to randomize 152 patients. Contact information for people with a specific interest in the trial Etienne Brain (study coordinator): etienne.brain@curie.fr Anne-Sophie Hamy-Petit (study co-coordinator): anne-sophie.hamy-petit@curie.fr Citation Format: Emanuel Buhrer, Eleni Xenophontos, Anne-Sophie Hamy-Petit, Jose Casas-Martin, Céline Callens, Thomas Meyskens, Coralie Poncet, Anastasia Lanzi, Etienne Brain. NOBLE – Neoadjuvant Olaparib and Durvalumab for patients with BRCA-associated TripLE Negative Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-19-11.

Abstract PO3-14-11: Association between BRCA alterations detected by circulating tumor DNA and germline mutations in breast cancer patients: a retrospective mono-institutional analysis

Abstract Background: PARP inhibitors (PARPi) are a standard of care for breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) with germline BRCA (gBRCA) mutation, with benefit demonstrated also in patients with somatic (s) BRCA1/2 mutations. The use of circulating tumor (ct) DNA testing allows to detect resistant and actionable alterations in BC, but it could be associated with the incidental identification of germinal mutations. The aim of this study was to describe the incidence of both, somatic and germinal BRCA1/2 alterations, and the impact on the therapeutic outcomes in a retrospective BC cohort with clinical ctDNA testing for their BC. Materials and methods: A retrospective cohort of 245 BC pts that underwent ctDNA analysis (Guardant 360) between August 2014 and May 2023 at Weill Cornell Medical College was identified. Pts with at least a BRCA1/2 alteration, including variant of uncertain significant (VUS) and synonymous, were enrolled in the study. A descriptive analysis was performed. Results: Among 35 patients included, 34 had metastatic disease, the median age was 61 years old (IQR 40-67), and 65.7% were post-menopausal at diagnosis. 57.1% of pts had hormone receptor positive/HER2 negative (HR+/HER2-) BC, 20% had HER2 positive disease and 22.9% were triple-negative (TN) BC. Ten (28.6%) and 20 (57.1%) pts had a sBRCA1 or a sBRCA2 alteration on ctDNA, respectively; 5 pts (14.3%) had a coexisting sBRCA1/2 mutation. The median variant allele frequency (VAF) was 1.2% for BRCA1 and 2.7% for BRCA2 alterations. Furthermore, 53.3% and 6.7% of sBRCA1 and 40% and 8% of sBRCA2 mutations were identified as VUS and synonymous, respectively. The most common associated genomic alterations included TP53 (62.9%), ESR1 (20%) and PI3KCA (52%) with a median number of 4 variants (IQR 2-7). Next generation sequencing (NGS) testing on tissue was available for 3 patients: two demonstrated concordance with BRCA alterations detected by ctDNA, whereas no alteration in BRCA1/2 genes was found for the third patient despite the tissue analysis was performed at the same time of the ctDNA. Germline testing was available for 24 (69%) pts; a corresponding gBRCA1 mutation was found for 3 pts (VAF 48.6%-84.3%), and a gBRCA2 for 8 pts (VAF 26.7%-49.5%). Due to the small sample size, a univocal VAF cut-off to detect gBRCA1/2 mutations could not be calculated. Twenty-nine pts had a sBRCA1/2 mutation detected by ctDNA test before starting a new therapy; of these 55.2% had HR+/HER2- disease, while 17.2% and 27.6% were HER2 positive and TN BC, respectively. The median progression free survival (mPFS) was 10.3 (3.2-17.4) months (ms) and the 1-year and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 82.3% and 70.5%, respectively. The mPFS was 10.3 ms (0-25.0) for patients (n=16) that underwent chemotherapy, 5.6 ms (0-15.1) for those who had received endocrine therapy (n=9), and not reached for patients treated with PARPi (n=4). Conclusions: ctDNA analysis allows the detection of sBRCA1/2 mutations that could be missed by tissue-based testing. The identification of BRCA alterations on ctDNA could guide the use of germline testing even when these are present at a lower VAF than expected, with relevant impact on the therapeutic choices and family screening. Further evaluation to establish the impact of sBRCA1/2 detected by ctDNA on the therapeutic algorithm decision are needed. Citation Format: Letizia Pontolillo, Eleonora Nicolò, Laura Munoz Arcos, Carolina Reduzzi, Mara Serena Serafini, Amanda Kaylan Strickland, Nadia Bayou, Jeannine Donahue, Elisabetta Molteni, Lorenzo Gerratana, Diana Giannarelli, Eleni Andreopoulou, Emilio Bria, Massimo Cristofanilli. Association between BRCA alterations detected by circulating tumor DNA and germline mutations in breast cancer patients: a retrospective mono-institutional analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-14-11.

Abstract PS11-07: High prevalence of HER2-Low and AR expression in breast cancer brain metastases provide novel therapeutic options

Abstract Background: Although survival rates for patients with advanced breast cancer (BC) have improved overall, rates of BC brain metastases (BCBM) have increased over the past two decades, occurring in up to 15% to 30% of patients. BCBM greatly reduce quality of life and overall survival (OS) and are now the leading cause of BC patient mortality. Patients with primary HER2+ and triple negative BC (TNBC) are at highest risk for BM. Locoregional therapy with surgery and radiation are currently standard of care (SOC), but these treatments have significant morbidity and BCBM progressing despite these interventions are hard to treat. Systemic therapies to reduce cognitive impairment and increase survival are desperately needed, particularly in HER2-negative patients. Currently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and small molecules such as PARP inhibitors are among the limited systemic options that have BCBM activity in HER2-negative BC. However, the benefit of these therapies is limited to a select group of patients. For example, androgen receptor (AR) is expressed in 60-80% of all BC and, in our recently completed clinical trial (NCT03206203), patients with AR+ metastatic TNBC treated with carboplatin +/- atezolizumab received no clinical benefit from the addition of atezolizumab. Alternatives to ICIs are needed for patients with AR+ TNBC. HER2-low (H2L) BC is a newly defined subset of HER2-negative BC with a HER2 immunohistochemical (IHC) score of 1+ ( >10%) or 2+/in situ hybridization (ISH) negative phenotype. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated significant clinical benefit from novel HER2 antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in treating H2L BC. Trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-Dxd), a HER2-directing ADC (topoisomerase I inhibitor conjugated to a humanized HER2-targeted antibody) was recently FDA approved as the first targeted therapy to treat H2L BC and can penetrate the blood–brain barrier. DESTINY-Breast04 demonstrated notable PFS and OS benefit of T-DXd compared to SOC in patients with H2L metastatic BC and included 61 patients with BCBM (results anticipated shortly). The overall rates of AR and H2L expression in patients with BCBM is unknown. The goal of this study is to investigate the prevalence of AR and HER2-low expression in a large cohort of BCBM treated at our institution. Methods: We retrospectively assessed rates of H2L and AR positivity (AR+) among patients with BCBM whose treatment included surgery at our institution between 2005-2023. Results were correlated with clinical receptor status (HR+/HER2-, HER2+/HR+, HER2+/HR- and TNBC) and clinical characteristics. Results of ER, PR, and HER2 testing performed for clinical purposes on the brain metastases and primary tumors were obtained from pathology reports. We retrieved formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks of the brain metastases and performed IHC for AR (SP107) and prognostic markers for cases with missing data. Results: We identified 101 cases of BCBM. Based on clinical prognostic markers, BCBM subtypes were HR+/HER2- (22%), HR+/HER2+ (14%), HER2+/HR- (21%) and TNBC (43%). Forty-five percent of the BCBM (n=45) were AR+ ( >10%) and 24% (n=24) demonstrated > 50% AR+. Among tumors with >50% AR+, 42% (n=10) are H2L (7 HR+[30%] and 3 TNBC [13%]). Forty-two percent of BCBM were H2L. Among the HER2-negative BCBM (n= 66), 64% (n=42) were H2L, including 23 of 44 TNBC (52%) and 19 of 22 HR+ (86)%. Fifteen percent of BMBC changed clinical subtype from the primary, including conversion to TNBC and H2L. Conclusion: AR+ positive (24% > 50% expression) and HER2-Low expressing (42%) tumors represent a significant proportion of our BCBM cohort providing exciting new options for treatment. Trials re-evaluating AR antagonists in combination with SOC utilizing high AR+ thresholds may benefit patients with BCBM. At least 10% of BCBM are both H2L and demonstrate >50% AR positivity providing the rationale for the combination of ADCs such as T-DXd and AR-targeted therapies for BCBM. Citation Format: Guadalupe Garcia, Paula Gonzalez-Ericsson, Brian Lehmann, Bret Mobley, Jennifer Pietenpol, Laura Kennedy, Ben Park, Melinda Sanders. High prevalence of HER2-Low and AR expression in breast cancer brain metastases provide novel therapeutic options [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PS11-07.

Abstract PO2-13-05: Deciphering pregnancy-associated breast cancer: distinctive molecular profile and clinical implications from GEICAM/2017-07 EMBARCAM study

Abstract Background: Pregnancy-Associated Breast Cancer (PABC) is defined as BC diagnosed during pregnancy, breastfeeding, or within the first year postpartum. This challenging entity has a distinct biology and worst prognosis and presents an increased risk for metastasis and death compared to non-PABC patients. Identification of molecular pathways that define this malignancy is crucial to explain its biological characteristics and potential association with pregnancy as well as serve to identify new biomarkers with preventive and clinical implications. This study assesses the gene expression profile of a PABC cohort from the Registry Study of Pregnancy and Breast Cancer (GEICAM/2017-07 EMBARCAM study, NCT04603820) to identify distinct molecular signatures and altered pathways for this entity. Methods: This was a multicenter, observational and ambispective age-matched cohort of PABC patients (n=46) and non-PABC patients (n=49). We analyzed the expression of 776 genes involved in 23 key breast cancer pathways, using the nCounter® Breast Cancer 360™ Panel (NanoString Technologies) on BC tumor samples, including molecular subtypes by PAM50 gene signature. Associations between individual differential genes and epidemiological and clinical features of these patients were explored. Normalized differential expression values were log2-transformed for statistical analysis in nSolver Software (NanoString Technologies). P-values were adjusted within each gene/signature and on the grouping variable level difference t-test using the Benjamini and Yekutieli False Discovery Rate (FDR) adjustment. Results: PABC patients’ clinical subtypes were distributed as 43,5% HR-positive/HER2-negative, 17,4% HER2-positive and 39,1% triple negative BC. These patients reported higher family history of BC/ovarian cancer compared to non-PABC (52.17% vs 26.53%; p=0.0124). Differential gene expression showed distinct molecular profiles in PABC and non-PABC patients: significantly genes enrichment involved in cell proliferation and p53 signature for PABC patients and higher expression of apoptosis, TGF-β, and PTEN signatures for non-PABC (adj p< 0.05). Furthermore, CDK4 expression signature (adj p=0.124) and DNA damage repair signatures Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HDR) (adj p=0.083) and BRCAness (adj p=0.220) were also upregulated in PABC tumors. The most significantly upregulated genes in PABC patients (CCNA2, DEPDC1, FAM83D, CDC20, CDKN3, TRIP13, TTK, MAD2L1, KIF2C, and UBE2C) (adj p< 0.05) were involved in cell cycle regulation and DNA damage repair. PABC basal-like tumors were found to be significantly more prevalent than non-PABC, as per the PAM50 classification (45.7% vs 20.4%; p=0.020). Interestingly, basal-like PABC showed higher expression of ESR1 than basal-like non-PABC (logFC=1.486; p=0.022). In contrast, luminal A PABC tumors exhibited lower ESR1 expression vs non-PABC (logFC=-1.5; p=0.021). Additionally, HER2-enriched PABC tumors displayed lower B7-H3/CD276 expression compared to HER2-enriched non-PABC (adj p=0.031). Conclusions: Our study shows that PABC is potentially a clinical and molecular different entity with predominance of the basal-like subtype. Moreover, our results suggest the activation of oncogenic pathways related to cell proliferation, DNA damage repair and p53 mutations which may lead to a clinically more aggressive phenotype for PABC patients. Likewise, the enrichment of BRCAness and HRD signatures found in PABC patients in our study may suggest an increased genetic instability due to a breakdown in the DNA damage repair. These findings may be clinically relevant and translate to new treatment options in PABC patients, who may benefit from therapies targeting DNA repair or cell-cycle checkpoints, such as PARP inhibitors. Citation Format: Juan de la Haba-Rodríguez, Regina Peña, Marina Pollan, Yolanda Jerez Gilarranz, Jose Ponce, Antonio Fernández Aramburu, Blanca Cantos, Ana Santaballa Bertrán, Elena Galve, María Eva Pérez, Susana de la Cruz, María Helena López-Ceballos, Yolanda Fernández, Fernando Moreno, Sonia González, Manuel Ruíz - Borrego, Isabel Blancas, José L Alonso-Romero, Álvaro Jiménez-Arranz, Raúl Rincón, Silvia Guil, Alejandra Díaz-Chacón, Rosalía Caballero, Begoña Bermejo, Angel Guerrero. Deciphering pregnancy-associated breast cancer: distinctive molecular profile and clinical implications from GEICAM/2017-07 EMBARCAM study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-13-05.

Abstract GS01-05: Pembrolizumab + Olaparib vs Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy After Induction With Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy for Locally Recurrent Inoperable or Metastatic TNBC: Randomized Open-Label Phase 2 KEYLYNK-009 Study

Abstract Background: Pembrolizumab (pembro) plus chemotherapy (chemo) showed statistically significant improvements in PFS and OS vs placebo + chemo in patients (pts) with previously untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) whose tumors expressed PD-L1 with a combined positive score (CPS) ≥10 in the phase 3 KEYNOTE-355 study. Tolerable and effective maintenance regimens after induction therapy are needed to sustain clinical benefit. The PARP inhibitor olaparib is an established maintenance therapy for multiple platinum-sensitive tumor types and prior data suggest that PARP inhibitors combined with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors could provide an improved therapeutic effect. KEYLYNK-009 (NCT04191135) is a randomized open-label phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of maintenance pembro + olaparib vs pembro + chemo in pts with locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic TNBC who had clinical benefit from induction with 1L pembro + platinum-based chemo. Methods: Eligible pts with measurable, locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic TNBC that had not been previously treated with chemo in the metastatic setting received induction therapy for up to 6 cycles of pembro 200 mg + chemo (carboplatin AUC 2 + gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) every 3 wk (Q3W). Pts with complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) after 4-6 treatment cycles were randomized 1:1 to receive pembro 200 mg Q3W + olaparib 300 mg twice daily or pembro + chemo (continued induction regimen). Olaparib or chemo was continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity; pembro was continued for up to 35 cycles (including induction treatment), progression, or unacceptable toxicity. Pts were stratified by induction response (CR or PR vs SD, by RECIST v1.1), tumor PD-L1 status (CPS ≥1 vs CPS < 1), and tumor genomic status (tBRCAm vs tBRCAwt). Dual primary endpoints were PFS per RECIST v1.1 by BICR and OS from randomization in all pts. Secondary endpoints included PFS and OS from randomization in pts with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 tumors and in pts with tBRCAm, and safety. Results: Of the 460 pts who received induction therapy, 271 were randomly assigned to pembro + olaparib (n=135) or pembro + chemo (n=136). At the Dec 15, 2022 data cutoff, median follow-up was 17.2 mo. Maintenance pembro + olaparib did not significantly improve PFS or OS vs pembro + chemo after induction therapy (Table). Median PFS was longer with pembro + olaparib vs pembro + chemo in pts with tBRCAm, but not in pts with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 tumors; a similar trend was observed for OS (Table). In 268 treated pts, treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 114 of 135 pts (84.4%) for pembro + olaparib and in 128 of 133 pts (96.2%) for pembro + chemo. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 44 pts (32.6%) for pembro + olaparib (0 deaths) and in 91 pts (68.4%) for pembro + chemo (2 [1.5%] deaths), with 12 (8.9%) vs 26 (19.5%) discontinuations for TRAEs, respectively. Conclusions: The primary endpoints of PFS and OS were not met in an unselected population of pts with advanced TNBC. However, directionally favorable improvements in PFS and OS were observed in pts with tBRCAm with pembro + olaparib vs pembro + chemo, representing a potential maintenance strategy. Further data are required to confirm this effect. No new safety signals were observed, and there were fewer TRAEs in the pembro + olaparib group vs the pembro + chemo group. PFS and OS were evaluated from the time of randomization. *Based on stratified Cox regression model with Efron’s method of tie-handling with treatment as a covariate. NR = not reached. Citation Format: Hope Rugo, Mark Robson, Seock-Ah Im, Florence Dalenc, Eduardo Yañez Ruiz, Young-Hyuck Im, Sergii Kulyk, Oleksandr Dudnichenko, Néstor Llinás-Quintero, Shigehira Saji, Yasuo Miyoshi, Nadia Harbeck, Li Fan, Jaime Mejia, Vassiliki Karantza, David Cescon. Pembrolizumab + Olaparib vs Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy After Induction With Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy for Locally Recurrent Inoperable or Metastatic TNBC: Randomized Open-Label Phase 2 KEYLYNK-009 Study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr GS01-05.

Abstract PO1-20-07: Valosin-containing protein (VCP)/p97: A novel breast cancer susceptibility gene?

Abstract Introduction: Mutations in the valosin-containing protein (VCP, also known as p97) gene are associated with autosomal dominant inclusion-body myopathy with early-onset Paget disease and frontotemporal dementia. VCP is an ATPase that subserves a variety of cellular functions, prominently, organelle biogenesis and ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation. Recently, VCP has also been shown to physically interact with BRCA1 and is postulated to orchestrate the response to DNA double-strand breaks, a critical molecular prelude to homologous recombination DNA repair. Moreover, VCP is also involved in the removal of trapped poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase 1 (PARP1) from chromatin and may play a key role in the response of tumor cells to PARP inhibitors. Whether VCP acts as a breast cancer predisposition gene is currently unknown. These observations raise speculation as to whether pathologic variation in VCP may predispose to breast cancer. Case Description: A 45-year-old female presented with early-age, locally advanced invasive ductal carcinoma, grade 2, ER < 1%, PR 10%, HER2 IHC 3+, FISH ratio 5.4. The patient completed 6 cycles of neoadjuvant PTH and was surgically downstaged to ypT1bN1a at the time of her left mastectomy. She declined adjuvant radiation. She received 1 dose of trastuzumab emtansine which was discontinued due to intolerance and transitioned to complete 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab and pertuzumab. Her medical history is significant for inclusion body myopathy with Paget disease of bone and/or frontotemporal dementia, which was diagnosed at age 36 after presenting with proximal muscle weakness. Bone scan was consistent with Paget’s disease and neurocognitive testing did not identify any abnormalities. Diagnosis was confirmed via whole genome germline sequencing which identified a pathogenic variant in VCP [c.463C >G (p.Arg155Gly)]. Germline resequencing of 155 known cancer predisposition genes did not identify any pathogenic variants. Whole exome genomic analysis of the patient’s breast cancer revealed an elevated homologous recombination score ( > 42), consistent with molecularly important role of VCP in homologous recombination breast cancer DNA repair. The patient’s family history is significant for muscular dystrophy in multiple family members on her paternal side, each of whom was deceased prior to age 60. Her paternal half-sister has both inclusion body myopathy and breast cancer, and her paternal cousin was diagnosed with breast cancer at age 46 (unknown genetic testing for each). No history of cancer on her maternal side. Discussion: This case raises the intriguing question of whether the VCP gene represents a heretofore unrecognized breast cancer predisposition gene. Further investigation into the role of VCP in tumorigenesis is warranted, and additional population studies are necessary to confirm VCP’s role in breast cancer predisposition. Given that cancers with homologous recombination deficiencies benefit from PARP inhibitors and VCP is involved in the function of the PARP1 protein, patients with mutations in the VCP gene may benefit from PARP inhibition. Citation Format: Alexis LeVee, Duveen Sturgeon, Joanne Mortimer, Kevin McDonnell. Valosin-containing protein (VCP)/p97: A novel breast cancer susceptibility gene? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-20-07.

Abstract PO5-15-04: MammaPrint index predicts neoadjuvant chemosensitivity in patients with HR+HER2- early-stage breast cancer in the real-world evidence FLEX study

Abstract Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) yields low pathologic complete response (pCR, ypT0/is ypN0) rates in hormone receptor positive (HR+), HER2- early-stage breast cancer (ESBC). Genomic signatures may predict chemosensitivity and treatment benefit better than receptor status based clinical subtyping. The 70-gene expression signature, MammaPrint (MP), classifies patients with ESBC as having a High or Low Risk of distant recurrence. In the NBRST and ISPY2 trials, further stratification of MammaPrint High Risk into High 1 (H1) or High 2 (H2) showed significantly higher pCR rates to NCT or targeted agents in MP H2 cancers compared to MP H1 tumors. We evaluated MammaPrint H1 and H2 status as a biomarker for neoadjuvant chemosensitivity in patients with HR+HER2- ESBC enrolled in the real-world evidence FLEX study. Methods: FLEX (NCT03053193) is an ongoing prospective, observational trial that has currently enrolled 12,328 patients with ESBC who were tested with MammaPrint as standard of care, with or without molecular subtyping signature, BluePrint (BP), and consented to clinically annotated full genome data collection (data locked Feb. 2023). Patients with HR+HER2-, MP High Risk tumors who received NCT (majority received AC-T) and had pCR data available were included in this analysis (n = 214). Patients were stratified into MP H1 (index 0.000 to -0.569) and H2 (index -0.570 to -1.000) groups. BP classified MP High Risk tumors into Luminal B-, HER2-, or Basal-Type. Differences in clinical characteristics and pCR rates between H1 and H2 tumors was assessed by Chi-Squared test and two-sided proportional z-test, respectively. The association between MP H1 and H2, BP subtype, and pCR was assessed using logistic regression and was adjusted for age, race, grade, T stage, N stage, and NCT regimen. Results: MammaPrint classified 142 (66%) cancers as H1 and 72 (34%) as H2 tumors. Age, menopausal status, race, tumor stage, and lymph node status were comparable between both groups. Although most H2 tumors (78%) were Grade 3, only 59% of all Grade 3 tumors were H2. Nearly all (98%) H1 tumors were Luminal B whereas for H2 tumors, 51% were Luminal B and 49% were Basal by BP classification. pCR rate was significantly higher in H2 tumors (29.2%) compared to H1 tumors (6.3%, p < 0.01) (Table). Basal-Type, H2 tumors (n=35) exhibited the highest pCR rate of 37.1%. Among BP Luminal B tumors, those with MP H2 tumors had a significantly higher pCR rate (21.6%) vs. MP H1 tumors (5.8%, p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis revealed MP H2 (OR=4.91, p=0.003) and BP Basal-Type (OR=3.54, p=0.03) were significantly associated with likelihood of pCR, whereas clinical variables were not associated with pCR. Conclusion: These data demonstrate MammaPrint and BluePrint utility to predict the likelihood of achieving pCR after NCT in HR+HER2- ESBC. Although both MP High Risk groups exhibit chemosensitivity, High 2 tumors have higher chemosensitivity than High 1 tumors. MP High 2 status can be utilized to identify ER+ patients who are the most likely to experience pathologic downstaging and pCR after NCT. Also, patients with High 2 tumors treated with PD-L1 or PARP inhibitors in the ISPY2 trial exhibited significantly higher pCR rates than those observed for High 2 tumors treated with NCT alone. These data suggest that for patients with MP High 2 tumors, neoadjuvant use of chemotherapy is appropriate and these patients may further benefit from the addition of targeted agents to standard NCT. Table: Distribution of pCR rates among MammaPrint H1 and H2 and BluePrint molecular subgroups Data presented as # of patients with pCR/(total # patients in subgroup) and as percentage Citation Format: Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Lajos Pusztai, Cathy Graham, Pat Whitworth, Peter Beitsch, Cynthia Osborne, Rakhshanda Rahman, Andrea Menicucci, William Audeh, FLEX Investigators' Group. MammaPrint index predicts neoadjuvant chemosensitivity in patients with HR+HER2- early-stage breast cancer in the real-world evidence FLEX study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-15-04.

Abstract PO4-05-03: Cell-free tumor DNA analysis in advanced or metastatic breast cancer patients enrolled in the German registry study PRAEGNANT

Abstract Background Accurate molecular profiling is crucial for optimal treatment decisions in advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Liquid biopsies, such as circulating cell-free tumor DNA (cfDNA, cftDNA or ctDNA), provide a non-invasive approach to monitor molecular alterations in the tumor. The German PRAEGNANT registry study aims to investigate such molecular biomarkers for precision medicine and their practical integration into clinical practice. In this context, cftDNA testing was performed as part of a PRAEGNANT research subproject, with the objectives of understanding the physician's rationale for initiating cftDNA testing, identifying detected alterations, and assessing the clinical impact of the associated findings Methods Patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer were prospectively enrolled in the PRAEGNANT registry study (NCT02338167). The decision to undergo cftDNA testing was based on the physician's discretion. Blood samples were collected using Streck cfDNA BCT tubes and sent to the GUARDANT Health central laboratory for cftDNA extraction and subsequent next-generation sequencing analysis, employing the FDA-approved GUARDANT360 CDx test, a 74 gene panel including all guideline-recommended biomarkers, including single nucleotide variants (SNVs), indels, fusions and amplifications. Recruitment of patients occurred at four PRAEGNANT study centers between April 2022 and July 2023. The GUARDANT360 CDx report, along with a questionnaire regarding the testing intent and clinical impact of the results, was provided to the treating physician. Results 46 patients were eligible for analysis as per clinical characteristics. CftDNA analysis was successfully performed for all 46 cases. 38 (83%) harbored at least one somatic alteration in the analyzed genes. Fifteen patients (33%) harbored alterations in TP53, thirteen (28%) in PIK3CA. Five patients (11%) harbored mutations in ESR1. Somatic mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 were detected for five (11%) and six (13%) patients, respectively. One BRCA2 mutation was categorized as synonymous and one BRCA2 and three BRCA1 alterations as variants of uncertain significance. Eight patients (17%) harbored mutations in ATM. Most patients included were HR+HER2- (N=27, 58%). In this subgroup, eight (30%) patients had a PIK3CA alteration, five (19%) with an indication for treatment with alpelisib, eight (30%) a mutation in ATM, BRCA1 or BRCA2 and four (15%) in ESR1. Questionnaires regarding intention of testing and clinical impact were completed by 43 treating physicians (93%). Among them, 33% of patients had current indications for PARP inhibitor treatment, and 61% would consider it at the next change of therapy if a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation was detected. Additionally, 21% of patients had a current indication for alpelisib treatment if a relevant PIK3CA mutation was found, and 58% would consider it in the next line of treatment. Overall, cfDNA testing influenced the current or future treatment decisions in 35% of patients. Discussion The high prevalence of somatic alterations in TP53, PIK3CA, ESR1, and BRCA1/2 genes, identified through cftDNA testing with GUARDANT360 CDx, highlights their potential as biomarkers for targeted therapies in advanced/metastatic breast cancer. Detection of specific mutations influenced treatment decisions, such as eligibility for alpelisib or PARP inhibitors and might further facilitate treatment with elacestrant in future treatment lines after its approval in Germany. These findings demonstrate the clinical impact of cftDNA testing in guiding personalized treatment selection. Additionally, the identification of such somatic alterations within a registry study like PRAEGNANT presents a unique opportunity to consider enrolling these patients into biomarker-guided clinical trials. Citation Format: Hanna Hübner, Pauline Wimberger, Elena Laakmann, Eugen Ruckhäberle, Matthias Ruebner, Theresa Link, Erik Belleville, Iris Faull, Marcus Hausch, Diethelm Wallwiener, Andreas Schneeweiss, Hans Tesch, Sara Brucker, Peter A. Fasching, Volkmar Müller, Tanja Fehm. Cell-free tumor DNA analysis in advanced or metastatic breast cancer patients enrolled in the German registry study PRAEGNANT [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-05-03.

Abstract PO4-06-02: Frequency of presentation and outcomes of stage IV breast cancer over the past decade: a population-based study

Abstract Background: Over the past decade, there have been major advances for the treatment of patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). For pts with hormone receptor (HR) positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative MBC, newer treatments include CDK 4/6 inhibitors among other targeted therapies; for HER2+ MBC, we have seen the development of antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) and other anti-HER2 agents; and for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) options include immunotherapy, ADCs, and PARP inhibitors. The aims of this study were to evaluate time trends in clinical characteristics, frequency of presentation and outcomes of pts with stage IV breast cancer over the past decade. Methods: Using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program, we identified pts diagnosed with breast cancer between 2010-2020. Pts required to have known HR and HER2 status and known stage at diagnosis. We described the proportion of stage IV disease overall for each tumor subtype and evaluated trends in the proportion of stage IV over time. Outcomes were evaluated by breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) using Kaplan-Meier. Among stage IV pts, we conducted multivariable cox models to assess changes in BCSS over time, stratified by tumor subtype and adjusted for age at diagnosis, race and ethnicity, sex, tumor grade, histology, surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, sites of distant metastases, marital status, median household income, rurality and US region. We evaluated overall survival as a secondary endpoint. Results: We included 443,631 pts of whom 24,788 (5.59%) had stage IV disease at diagnosis. Pts with stage IV breast cancer had a median age of 61 years and a median follow up of 57 months (IQR 28 – 89 months). When compared to stage I-III, stage IV pts were more often of Black race (10.4% for stage I-III vs 15.7% for stage IV), less often married (56.7% vs 43.5%, respectively) and less often HR+/HER2- (74.1% vs 59.9%, respectively); all p < 0.001. Among pts with stage IV, the frequency of each metastatic site at initial diagnosis was: bone 66.45%, lung 30.47%, liver 25.79%, and brain 7.9%. Across all years (2010-2020), the proportion of stage IV disease varied significantly by tumor subtype: 4.6% in HR+/HER2-, 8.5% in HR+/HER2+, 11.3% in HR-/HER2+, and 7.1% in TNBC; p < 0.001. The proportion of stage IV increased modestly during 2010-2020 in HR+/HER2- tumors (4.6% in 2010 to 5.1% in 2020, p for trend = 0.01), in HR-/HER2+ (10% in 2010 to 13.7% in 2020, p for trend < 0.001), and in TNBC (6.9% in 2010 to 7.8% in 2020, p for trend = 0.001). No significant difference was observed in the proportion of stage IV over time in HR+/HER2+ (p for trend = 0.76). Rate of BCSS at 5 years was: 32.51% for HR+/HER2-, 43.92% for HR+/HER2+, 37.28% for HR-/HER2+, and 10.97% for TNBC; p < 0.001. In adjusted Cox models, BCSS improved significantly over time for each additional year in HR+/HER2- (adjusted Hazard Ratio [HzR] 0.982, p = 0.01), in HR+/HER2+ (adjusted HzR 0.945, p < 0.001), and in HR-/HER2+ (adjusted HzR 0.959, p = 0.03). The improvement in BCSS over time in TNBC was not significant (adjusted HzR 0.982, p = 0.15). Overall survival results were similar to those of BCSS both in 5-year rates as well as Cox model results. Conclusions: In this population-based study, we saw that the proportion of pts presenting with de-novo stage IV varied significantly by tumor subtype, being as low as 4.6% in HR+/HER2- and as high as 11.3% in HR-/HER2+ disease. These proportions have unfortunately increased over time in most subtypes, highlighting a need for additional research to identify the reasons behind these trends. BCSS improved significantly over time in HR+/HER2- and in both HER2+ subtypes, coinciding with a time period of important therapeutic advances. TNBC remains a highly unmet medical need and further follow up is needed to assess the impact of newer treatments. Citation Format: Jorge Avila, Julieta Leone, Nabihah Tayob, Carlos Vallejo, Michael Hassett, Nancy Lin, Sara Tolaney, Jose Leone. Frequency of presentation and outcomes of stage IV breast cancer over the past decade: a population-based study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-06-02.

Abstract PO4-02-03: Distribution of MammaPrint, BluePrint, and Response Predictive Subtypes based on ImPrint and Reprint in ER+/HER2- Invasive Lobular Carcinoma – A FLEX sub study

Abstract Background: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), the second most common histologic subtype of breast cancer, is increasingly recognized as a distinct tumor type compared to the more common invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). While ILC is known to have lower rates of pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, ILC tumors are biologically heterogenous. As such, genomic signatures might identify patients with ILC who might benefit from tailored treatment options. The gene expression signature MammaPrint (MP) classifies tumors as having a Low Risk or High Risk of distant recurrence. MP combined with BluePrint (BP), a molecular subtyping signature, categorizes tumors as Luminal A (MP Low Risk), Luminal B (MP High Risk), Basal or HER-2 type. ImPrint is a 53-gene signature that identifies HR+HER2- patients predicted to benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors. RePrint is a 60-gene DNA repair deficiency (DRD) signature that identifies HR+HER2- patients who may benefit from PARP inhibitors with platinum agents. Response Predictive Subtypes (RPS), used in the I-SPY2 trial, combine clinical subtype and these genomic signatures to personalize treatment planning and improve outcomes. In this study, we determined the distribution of 3 RPS in HR+HER2-: (1) ImPrint-/RePrint-, (2) ImPrint-/RePrint+ (3) ImPrint+, in patients ILC compared to IDC enrolled in the FLEX trial. Methods: This study includes 1078 HR+HER2-women with ILC and 6078 with IDC enrolled in FLEX registry. FLEX (NCT03053193) is a prospective, observational trial that includes stage I-III breast cancer patients who undergo MammaPrint testing (with or without BluePrint) as standard of care, and consent to full transcriptome and clinical data collection. MP High Risk tumors were further stratified into High 1 and High 2. ImPrint and Reprint results were used to determine RPS. A two-tailed proportional z-test was used to assess differences between ILC and IDC as well as between RPS. Results: ILC patients had a significantly lower percentage of MP High Risk tumors in comparison to IDC. Among MP High Risk tumors, those with ILC had significantly more MP High 1 than patients with IDC. BP subtyping in ILC tumors showed significantly lower percentage of Basal, and Luminal B, and higher percentage of Luminal A compared to IDC tumors. For RPS, a higher percentage of ILC tumors were ImPrint-/RePrint- compared to IDC, whereas lower frequencies of ImPrint-/RePrint+ and ImPrint+ were found. Within the ILC ImPrint+ subgroup (n=14), 1 (7.1%) was classified as High 2 and 10 (71.4%) as High 1 and 3 (21.4%) as Low Risk. All 14 (100%) ImPrint+ patients were BP Luminal. In contrast, within the IDC MP High Risk ImPrint+ subgroup (n=328), 233 (71.0%) were High 2, 88 (26.8%) High 1 and 7 Low Risk (2.1%). Furthermore 193 (60.7%) were classified as BP Basal, 2 HER2 (0.6%) and 123 (38.7%) Luminal within this IDC RPS. Conclusions: This is the first study to investigate the distribution of Response Predictive Subtypes in ILC, which will be beneficial to optimize the treatment selection for patients with early-stage HR+/HER2- ILC. Though the percentage of ImPrint+ is lower in ILC, this study revealed a small subset of patients in ILC with potential response to Immunotherapy. Furthermore, these results underscore the heterogeneity of ILC tumors and generate further hypotheses to investigate the immune cell abundance in ILC compared to IDC and correlate immune cell abundance to ImPrint status. Table: Genomic and Tumor Characteristics of HR+HER2- ILC and IDC tumors Citation Format: Rita Mukhtar, Christina Yau, Denise Wolf, Adam Brufsky, Hannah Linden, Natasha Hunter, Reshma Mahtani, Abirami Sivapiragasam, Trevor Feinstein, Fengting Yan, Ian Grady, Priscilla McAuliffe, Michaela Tsai, Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Blanche Mavromatis, Sasha Davis, Josien Haan, William Audeh, Lavanya Samraj, FLEX Investigators' Group. Distribution of MammaPrint, BluePrint, and Response Predictive Subtypes based on ImPrint and Reprint in ER+/HER2- Invasive Lobular Carcinoma – A FLEX sub study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-02-03.